Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Outline of Presentation
Multi-faceted activity
Remains as one of the challenging tasks
A pre-requisite for optimum extraction of an ore body
It is not, however, an automated process since each ore
body is unique
As a result, planning, development, extraction, and
scheduling of production of an underground or open pit
mine is not a relatively easy and simple process.
Modeling complex stratigraphic deposits is one of the
greatest challenges for mine planners.
Decision Complexity
Decision to develop an ore body by underground or open
pit method is an important and critical process
It defines not only the overall quantity of ore, but also the
overall rate of return.
Mine planning moves into a dynamic stage once the
mining is started
Heterogeneous ore body, ore grade is seldom uniform
Add to this, the uncertainty about metal price
Challenges or Opportunities ?
Cut-off grade is often used on underground metal mines to
determine economic limits and is based on mine-wide
average parameters
General cut-off grade is not valid as many parameters vary by
location does not show which areas deliver the greatest value
or which areas are not economical
Approach should be to split the deposit in blocks and calculate
economics for each block
What is Needed ?
What is needed ?
A mine plan that accommodates changes:
Resources
Commodity price
Costs
Cash flow
Project detail level
16
Block Model
Fault Zone
Stope Design(Vulcan)
Blast Design
Planning Functionality
Long term planning function allows creation and evaluation of unique
ore body configurations, and ever changing mine plans throughout the
life of the mine, equipment requirements, and the profitability of the
project.
Short term planning functions such as reserve calculations, blast
design, etc, integrated with optimization and production scheduling
are available on demand.
The production function facilitates daily production attributes such as
day-to-grade control, blast design, in-mine production management ,
tying back into the geological model, planning and design.
Scheduling Technologies
MineMAX Planner: Pit Optimization
MineMAX Scheduler: Strategic Schedule
Optimization with Blending, Stockpiling and
Complex Mineral Process Modelling
MineMAX iGantt: Activity-based Gantt
Chart 3D Production Scheduling
Production Scheduling
Click on a 3D object to
sequence the activity on a resource
Set a precedence with another activity
Equipment Scheduling
Schedule equipment considering:
Different mining rates for varying ground
conditions
Scheduled equipment maintenance
Operator availability.
Over-allocated Jumbo
Optimize NPV
Satisfy Blending
Requirements
Model Series and Parallel
Material Flow
Alternative Process Routes
Alternative Products with
own prices
Address Intermediate
Stockpiling
Consider Multiple Pits /
Mines
iGantt View
Stopes:
- sulphur A (grade: 20 +/- 4%)
B (6 +/- 2.7%)
- oxides C (grade 8+/- 2.1%)
D (5+/-3%)
Mine Layout
Stope C
Stope D
Stope B
Stope A
Concentrator Plant
Oxide Zone
Leaching Pad
Sulphur Zone
Passenger
loading level
(shift change)
SULPHUR
BIN
OXIDE
BIN
Mine Layout
Stope C
STK-S
Stope B
STK-O
3 +/-1 min.
Stope A
Concentrator Plant
4 +/-1.5 min.
2 min.
7 +/-4 min.
5 +/-3 min.
Oxide Zone
Leaching Pad
Sulphur Zone
Passenger
loading level
(shift change)
QBIN-S
SULPHUR
BIN
QBIN-O
OXIDE
BIN
15 +/5 min.
WHAT TO CONTROL?
Run-of-Mine Grade for Sulphur & Oxides
Number of Trucks and Scoops
Negotiating Time between ore and personnel transport
Average R-O-M production
Availability of Ore Bins
Availability of Stockpiles
Availability of Locomotive number of mine cars
Consider changes in current infrastructure, i.e. number of cars, equipment units,
skips and bin capacities for a production increase from 3,000 to 5,000 tpd
1200
1000
800
29
27
25
23
21
19
17
15
13
11
600
400
200
0
1
Tons
Suplhides
Days
Oxides
4
2
Days
29
27
25
23
21
19
17
15
13
11
0
1
Surface Mining:
Ramp, vent raises and escapeways to the active pit;
10/12/2011
.
Mine Ventilation Design Options and Economic Analysis
(Adapted from Hongliang Wang 2011)
Q1: What is the best way to design the mine?
There might be 16 different scenarios:
Cut-off grade (Oz/ton): 0.15, 0.18, 0.20, 0.22;
Stope width (ft): 15, 20, 25, 30.
North
Lantern 3 Pit: 2010~2011
Q2: How
Lanternmany reserves we can generate?
Pit Model total resource:
2010MY
800,000 ounces; average grade @ 0.25;
Decline
Dual Decline:
~10,000 ft, 16X16, $11M,
@ $950 gold price, 10% discount rate
NPV with 0.2 cutoff designs:
$45K
Exhausting or Forcing?
If the deposit
grows significantly
Main Fan
Human Dimension
Conclusion
Mining is changing because of increased liabilities, permitting,
cost of environmental, and safety compliances.
More productive and economic alternatives, larger efficient
equipment and automation are also changing the mining
industry.
New mining developments , geology through mine closure will
be entirely integrated from planning through the operating
phases of the life of the mine.
The economic success of mining company will increasingly
depend on the fully integrated mine planning and feedback
mechanism.
Conclusion
Integrating all aspects of mining from exploration through
closure, mine plans can be developed based on a strong
understanding of ore body and other parameters throughout
the mining life cycle. By evaluating multiple future scenarios,
the best mining method, sequence and operational
characteristics under a number of changing environments can
be determined. Using this information, a management team
can ensure an appropriately balanced risk profile for mining
company. When is the right time to invest on project? Under
what circumstances should the production expand or
contract?
Conclusion
Mine planners are constantly under pressure to
evaluate the changing economic times and newly
acquired data on the mine plans.
Incorporating these changes such as metal price,
fluctuating cost assumptions, and newly acquired
geological and mine production data requires a
quick turnaround for model building and planning to
keep pace with changes as they occur.
Engineers can now quickly create and adapt
geological models and mine plans based on
constantly shifting field data.
Acknowledgements
Hongliang (Henry) Wang, Newmont USA Ltd.,
SME Annual Meeting, Denver, 2011.
Jourgen Fuyschot, SRK Consulting, Minex Conference, 2009
Kantula Lahiri-Dutt, Int. Conference on Mining, Phnon Penh,
May 2011.
Will Collingwood, University of Alaska Fairbanks, 2011
Kumar Vaibhav Raj, University of Alaska Fairbanks, 2011
Maptek-Vulcan & iGantt