Professional Documents
Culture Documents
States
v.
LookChaw
G.R.
No.
5887,
18
Phil.
573
December
16,
1910
FACTS:
Defendant
was
found
to
have
carried,
kept,
possessed
90
kilos
of
opium
and
that
he
had
been
caught
in
the
act
of
selling
1,000
pesos
worth
of
prepared
opium
o Complaints
are
(on
separate
charges0
Unlawful
possession
of
opium
Sale
of
opium
o This
case
is
only
on
unlawful
possession
of
opium
Between
11
&
12
am,
August
19,
1909
o Messengers
Jack
and
Milliron
(chief
of
department
of
Cebu
port
and
internal
revenue
agent
of
Cebu,
respectively)
Went
aboard
English
steamship
Erroll
to
inspect
and
search
its
cargo
Found
one
sack
in
saloon,
another
in
the
hold
Hold:
under
the
defendants
control
and
possession
with
intention
of
selling
them
in
mexico
or
in
Puerto
de
vera
Cruz
Found
another
lot
of
four
cans
of
opium
In
area
where
firemen
habitually
sleep
Firemen
were
allowed
to
retain
certain
amounts
of
opium
as
long
as
its
not
taken
ashore
Found
another
can
of
opium
Defendant
admitted:
the
opium
seized
in
vessel
was
bought
by
him
in
Hongkong
at
P3/can
and
P5/sack
to
sell
it
in
Mexico
and
Puerto
de
Vera
Cruz
o Also
admitted
that
he
sold
opium
in
Cebu
for
P16/can;
and,
o Has
contract
to
sell
P500
worth
of
opium
o He
is
claiming
that
the
lower
court
has
no
jurisdiction
Lower
Court:
court
ruled
crime
was
committed
on
wharf
of
Cebu
o Sentenced
him
to
5
years
imprisonment
and
a
fine
of
P10,000
o Ordered
the
confiscation
of
exhibits
ISSUE:
WON
the
Philippine
Court
has
Jurisdiction
HELD/RATIO:
YES.
Although
mere
possession
of
thing
of
prohibited
use
aboard
a
foreign
vessel
does
not
constitute
a
crime
triable
by
courts
of
this
countrywhen
the
article
is
landed
upon
Philippine
soil
from
vessel,
it
is
already
a
violation
of
penal
law
absent
an
agreement
under
an
international
treaty
Court
reduced
imprisonment
and
fine
to
6
months
and
P1000
Note:
Erroll,
a
vessel
of
English
nationality,
was
in
transit.
(travelling
from
HK
to
Mexico
via
Cebu
port)