Professional Documents
Culture Documents
To:
Subject:
Date:
Attachments:
Gray, Neil D.
Li, Hui Chang
Interested Parties
Monday, March 16, 2015 11:29:38 AM
oak052022(1).pdf
Hi Hui Chang,
Can you send this email to all interested parties today?
To whom it may concern:
You are receiving this letter because you have expressed interest in the Lake Merritt Boulevard
residential tower project at the corner of E. 12th Street and 2nd Avenue. This project will be
presented in front of the Planning Commission on March 18, 2015. The meeting starts at 6:00 PM.
Attached is the agenda and here is a link to the staff report: Lake Merritt Blvd Staff Report.
Please Neil Gray at ngray@oaklandnet.com or (510)238-3878 if you have any questions.
Neil Gray, Planner III | City of Oakland | Bureau of Planning | 250 Frank H. Ogawa, Suite 2114
|Oakland, CA 94612 | Phone: (510)238-3878 | Fax: (510) 238-4730 | Email: ngray@oaklandnet.com |
Website: www.oaklandnet.com/planning
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Hi Diane,
I see that the staff report for next Wednesdays PRAC meeting is posted online and that the images
are in black and white and not that great quality.
Do the copies that PRAC members receive look like this too or do they receive color copies?
I am asking b/c I am wondering if it would be helpful for the Developers design team to have
color copies of the landscape plan ready for distribution and/or a powerpoint ready for their
presentation to PRAC ?
What do you recommend?
Thanks,
_____________________________________________
Hui-Chang Li
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Building More Housing + More Affordable Housing
My "10k2" housing initiative will build on Oakland's
housing boom throughout the city, especially in
transportation corridors, to provide much-needed
housing for increasing demand as more people move
to Oakland. Adding more than 10K in the pipeline
relieves pressure on existing residents to move in
order to make room for new residents. I pledge to fight for 25% of this new housing to
be affordable for low-income and middle-class residents. I will continue strengthening
our coordinated efforts to prevent foreclosures, protect tenants, and increase local
home ownership.
current residents while creating new, market rate housing for those who move to our
city:
Dds
The strategies below, which are currently in progress or under consideration by City
staff and partner agencies, are based upon best practice research and Oakland
demographic data and trends. Each bullet point represents a concrete action to address
the housing needs for Oakland's growing population.
I. Prevent Displacement
Bay Area economic recovery and strong interest in
Oakland have resulted in escalating housing costs.
The below strategies address the current top
displacement challenges faced by long-time Oakland
homeowners & tenants:
Prevent foreclosures of long-time, elderly
homeowners by purchasing distressed
mortgage notes from banks, modifying loans
and controlling disposition of foreclosed properties into new affordable housing:
secured commitment of National Community Capital for Oakland operations.
Goal of purchasing 1,000 distressed mortgage notes annually.
Create sustainable rental assistance through lower-interest rate loans or grants.
Goal of serving at least 1,000 tenant households annually.
Prevent loss of over 14,000 rental housing units at-risk in major earthquake
through requiring seismic retrofits, coupled with new loan fund program.
Prevent loss of critical rental housing stock by updating condo conversion
ordinance to cover units at greatest risk for conversion while enabling
homeownership opportunities for current tenants.
Change tenant relocation policy to require standard assistance and enable City
enforcement.
^:dW
Closeup: Oakland & the World Enterprises, Inc: An Innovative Project for West
Oakland
developer dropping into West Oakland with a plan to remove what's left of the black
community. We want development -- nobody wants to live in blighted areas -- but
without displacement."
Mayor Jean Quan's newsletter is not paid for with City funds.
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
Attachments:
(Diane, as a f/u to our conversationNeil, I can fill you in later todayDiane is advising that
landscape plan go to PRAC before Planning Commission. In that case, I want to push Developer to
put more detail in plan so that you can get on PRAC agenda by 2/11. Diane says you can get her
staff report as late as 1/26)
Hi Diane,
Please see attached for project description of Lake Merritt Blvd Apts. (FYI, this is just an excerpt
that I pulled out from another study).
Summary of Project Overview (See attached for more details, including maps & figures)
Location: E12th Street & Lake Merritt Blvd.
Last paragraph on page 4 describes the proposed improvements to the City park, as has been
informed so far by Planning staff and members of the community, most notably the Measure DD
Coalition members.
Attached is a sketch of the proposed landscape plan. As part of the Citys sale transaction for the
development parcel, we are asking the Developer to make off-site improvements to the adjacent
City-owned park
The idea is for this project to go to Planning Commission on March 18th and possibly DRC on
2/25.
Staff is seeking approval from PRAC for the developers proposed landscape plan.
Gotta run now, but will check in again in afternoon
_____________________________________________
Hui-Chang Li
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
Attachments:
Hi Theresa,
I know that you are waiting to receive some comments from City staff about your Draft #2,
submitted on Oct 21st before working on incorporating those comments into your next deliverable,
the Screencheck Draft.
I also understand that you will be holding on this work until you receive outstanding payment from
UrbanCore, which I am hopeful will be coming soon.
In the meanwhile, could you please review the attached letter from the Measure DD Coalition and
let me know if you believe these items regarding the wind and shadow impacts from LMA are
already addressed in our current scope or not? (Measure DD Coalition is a community group who
is closely following the LMA project and its effects on the Measure DD funded-improvements and
on the experience of the Lake as a public asset in general.)
I discussed with Neil Gray and he think the items about the shadow study are already addressed in
our existing scope. We also think most of the wind study points that the DD Coalition is asking to
be studied are already covered as well, but perhaps not exactly. See my notes below in red below
about how the wind points in the study correspond to the points that the Coalition wants to see
studied.
Wind Study:
The Coalition desires that the Wind Study calculate wind speeds before and after (simulated)
construction of proposed Lake Merritt Tower Apartments for at least the following locations:
(a) several points on the surface of the lake - no points on surface of lake are studied
(b) the east side pedestrian pathway along the Channel at the line of the OUSD fence
corresponds with points 13 and 14
at both pathways under the center of the vehicle bridge already covered by points 38 and
39
(d) at the center of the north and south topside sidewalks of the vehicle bridge points 36
and 37 cover the south topside but not the north side.
(e) at the center of the bicycle-pedestrian bridge yes, covered by point 40
(f) at the easterly portion of the passive park area adjoining the project yes, covered by
points 16 and 17
(g) at the public sidewalk fronting the project along E 12th Street
yes, covered by points 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Please let me know
1. Is my above assessment about the wind points accurate? Which of the wind points that DD
is interested in, if any, do you think are not already covered by your study?
2. I know for CEQA review purposes, the standard for wind is that the building under design
not increase likelihood of winds exceeding 36 mph at a given point for more than one hour
during daylight hours. The DD Coalition is asking for exact wind speeds before project and
after project is this kind of information something the wind consultant can provide?
3. Do you agree the shadow study already addresses what the shadow issues the DD Coalition
wants studied.
I would like to get your response to report to the DD Coalition at their Monday night meeting (on
the 17th ). Basically, if what the Coalition is asking for are things that can be studied but are not
already adequately covered under our existing Scope and if the DD Coalition insists on these items
being studied, then I will recommend that UrbanCore increase this Scope of work to ensure the
final environmental report addresses DDs concerns.
I look forward to your response and feel free to give me a call.
Thank you,
_____________________________________________
Hui-Chang Li
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
Importance: Tidal marsh plants require full sun. The Coalition desires to be informed if the new
building's height will cast more than minimum of shadows on the Tidal Marsh. Extended lengthy
shadows would affect the Marsh's restoration effort. Success of the Tidal Marsh is a requirement of
the City's permits with the U.S. Army Corps and the State Fish & Wildlife Agency.
Naomi Schiff
Joel Peter
James E Vann
Subcommittee for Coordination on Lake Merritt Boulevard Tower Apartments Project
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Attachments:
Hi Alicia, Could you send this notice out to the LMSAP listserv?
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
Attachments:
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
Attachments:
Hi Brigitte, Could you please post this meeting notice on your weekly announcements and help get the word out? Thank
you!
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
cbwurms@gmail.com
Li, Hui Chang
Lake Merritt Boulevard
Tuesday, October 29, 2013 8:17:50 PM
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
Attachments:
Michael Johnson
Li, Hui Chang
Lane, Patrick; Hunter, Gregory
Lake Merritt Schematic Design Package - Email 1 of 2
Tuesday, July 15, 2014 3:16:26 PM
Lake Merritt Tower Schematic Design Package_7-15-14.pdf
Please see attached. We will also send the Patillo Garrett Landscape Plan for the Park on
Wednesday morning fyr. Thanks and see you tomorrow, Michael
PS - please confirm receipt
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
Michael Johnson
Li, Hui Chang
Mike Pyatok; Dan Hogman
Lake Merritt Submittal
Friday, August 01, 2014 2:25:10 PM
Hui Chang, we were thinking about submitting to you on Monday Aug 4th an
electronic set of the drawings fyr. Then how many hard copy sets do you want, and
at either 30x42 or half size prints for distribution? Let us know. Thanks, Michael
__________________________
Michael E. Johnson
President & CEO
UrbanCore Development
457 10th Street
San Francisco, CA 94103
(415) 748-2300
mjohnson@urbancorellc.com
www.urbancorellc.com
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
Attachments:
Michael Johnson
Li, Hui Chang
Lane, Patrick; Flynn, Rachel; Don MacKenzie; Kirsty Greer; Brad Flewellen
Lake Merritt Tower - E. 12th Street Remainder Parcel
Tuesday, February 17, 2015 9:35:50 AM
UrbanCore Lake Merritt_Response_2-17-15.pdf
LMT - Letter of Intent to City.pdf
Don MacKenzie Bio.pdf
Kirsty Greer_Resume_2015.pdf
LMT-Letter of Disclosure to City.pdf
UCD-UDR_Lake Merritt Tower_Model_298 Units_2-12-15v2.pdf
LakeHouse Prelim Schedule_1-27-15.xlsx
UDR FInancial Information.pdf
Hui Chang, please find attached a transmittal letter in response to Patrick's letter on December 18,
2014, along with various attachments for your review. I would like to set up a meeting with you,
Patrick and Rachel to meet the team from UDR - our new Joint Venture partner on February 24th
when they are in town. Please let me know if you all are available. Thanks and talk soon. Regards,
Michael
_______________________
Michael E. Johnson, President
UrbanCore Development, LLC
4096 Piedmont Avenue
Suite 313
Oakland, CA 94611
c: (415) 748-2300
e: mjohnson@urbancorellc.com
www.urbancorellc.com
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
Attachments:
Michael Johnson
Gerard, Jennie
Lane, Patrick; Li, Hui Chang; Ronnie Turner; Merlin Edwards; Brad Flewellen
Lake Merritt Tower Project - E. 12th Street
Monday, April 06, 2015 10:41:41 PM
UrbanCore DDA Term Sheet Amendment 4 3 15.docx
Jennie, please review this with Abel. I think this captures what we discussed. UDR is
reviewing this at the same time, so I will let you know if they have any proposed
changes. Let's finalize this asap so Abel can discuss his support for the project with the
other Council Members before the CED Committee meeting next Tuesday April 14th. Let
me know any questions. Thanks, Michael
_______________________
Michael E. Johnson, President
UrbanCore Development, LLC
4096 Piedmont Avenue
Suite 313
Oakland, CA 94611
c: (415) 748-2300
e: mjohnson@urbancorellc.com
www.urbancorellc.com
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
Attachments:
Michael Johnson
Li, Hui Chang
Lane, Patrick; Ronnie Turner; merlin edwards; Brad Flewellen
Lake Merritt Tower Submittal Requirements Per ENA
Monday, October 27, 2014 7:10:41 AM
UC-Wolff_Lake Merritt Tower_Model_298 Units_10-25-14 (1).pdf
TWC Fact Sheet 2014.1.pdf
JSCO Lake Merritt Apartments Marketing Strategy (101414).pdf
Wolff Lake Merritt LOI.pdf
Letter to CED Committee_10-26-14.doc
Hui Chang, please find attached. Let me know if you have any questions. We also
included the letter we are delivering to the CED Committee. Please circulate that letter
and these documents to yous staff associates. Thanks, Michael
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
Michael Johnson
Li, Hui Chang; Hunter, Gregory; Lane, Patrick; Gray, Neil D.; Ferracane, Christina
Brad Flewellen; Mike Pyatok; Austin, Doug; Peter Waller; Ronnie Turner; Dan Hogman
Lake Merritt Tower
Monday, August 04, 2014 4:17:33 PM
Hui Chang, we are pleased to submit the Planning Application/Design Review Schematic
Design package for the Lake Merritt Tower Apartments. We have taken into consideration
the comments and feedback we received from City Staff and the community in these
drawings. Please look for a separate Drop Box email from Brad Flewellen later today
transmitting the package to you because of the large size of the file. We will also be
working directly with Neil directly on the Planning application submittal. We look forward
to coordinating the next community meeting in late August and to your review of this
package. Regards, Michael
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Attachments:
Michael Johnson
Li, Hui Chang; Lane, Patrick; Hunter, Gregory
Landscape Concept FYR - See you soon
Wednesday, July 16, 2014 12:43:51 PM
Lake Merritt Tower Landscape Concept_7-15-14.pdf
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Attachments:
Hi Michael, here are questions that came up for me as I wrote the staff report (and that have been
posed to me that I cant quite answer) that Id want you to help explain to me.
1. Real Estate Investment Trust ownership structure requires a fee simple arrangement
when acquiring land what is the basis of that? Also, why then would a ground
lease with an upfront payment equivalent to $5.1 million not work?
2. Can you explain why 6% is the required rate of return on equity?
3. Can you show me how you calculated the property tax of $1.6 million to be generated
to the City?
4. Lease Vs. Sale
Finally, can you help me review the attached and help clean it up/beef up my arguments or
provide any clarification/ corrections/ edits? The points in Attachment D provide the
additional analysis in the format that the City Attorneys Office is seeking for why staff is
recommending a sale instead of lease and are in response to the factors raised in the
December 2014 Agenda Report that concluded that in general it is better for the City to
lease vs. sale.
Feel free to give me a call on Monday. Have a nice weekend.
_____________________________________________
Hui-Chang Li
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
Attachments:
Christine Cherdboonmuang
Pattillo, Chris; Moore, Jim; jahazielbonillaoaklandpc@gmail.com; Coleman, Michael;
jmyres.oakplanningcommission@gmail.com; nagrajplanning@gmail.com; Emily Weinstein
eastlakeunited@gmail.com; Li, Hui Chang; Gray, Neil D.; Lane, Patrick; Ranelletti, Darin
Letter to Planning Commission re. E. 12th St. Remainder Parcel, from Eastlake United for Justice
Wednesday, April 01, 2015 3:04:41 PM
Executive Summary EUJ Planning Commission 04.01.15.pdf
EUJ Letter to Planning Commissioners FINAL 04.01.15.pdf
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
Attachments:
Hi Michael,
See attached letter from Patrick Lane.
This includes an updated schedule of pre-DDA milestones. Note that due to the requirement for 2
hearings at City Council to approve a DDA for a City-owned parcel, the earliest the DDA can be
approved will be April 21st .
Let me know if you have any questions, especially about the DDA Submittal Checklist.
Thank you,
_____________________________________________
Hui-Chang Li
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
Attachments:
Gray, Neil D.
Michael Johnson
Mike Pyatok; Li, Hui Chang; Dan Hogman
LMB Apts open space maintenance/improvements
Thursday, January 08, 2015 2:53:22 PM
image001.png
image002.png
image003.png
Hi Michael,
Do you have a detailed description of how the developer will improve and maintain the open space adjacent to the
LMB apartment site? I need this description for the PRAC staff report.
Thanks,
Neil
Neil Gray, Planner III | City of Oakland | Bureau of Planning | 250 Frank H. Ogawa, Suite 2114 |Oakland, CA 94612 |
Phone: (510)238-3878 | Fax: (510) 238-4730 | Email: ngray@oaklandnet.com | Website: www.oaklandnet.com/planning
Dan, I don't understand the 14, 442 calc. Can you send a diagram outline. I think the
version that should be used is the 12, 776 sf, so please send an outline of this
version. Thanks, MJ
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 2:40 PM, Dan Hogman <dhogman@pyatok.com> wrote:
Hui Chang, Mike,
Here is the latest areas takeoff, and numbers vary, depending on how you measure.
12,776 SF measured at perimeter, or the enclosed are of the tower, per Mikes previous email, slightly updated.
12,586 SF measured at perimeter, subtracting the elevator shafts. All other shafts are included. This is the actual
built floor area.
Or, measured by multiplying length and width 12,870 SF - 196-6 x 656 where 656 is the width of the bulk of the tower, bays excluded.
14,442 SF - 196-6 x 736 where 736 is the maximum width extend. Please note that the tower steps in at bulk
Hi Dan- as per the comments below, can you double-check the area of our tower? thanks
Thanks, Mike.
The comparative information on 1200 Lakeshore is helpful.
To be clear, I calculated that the Lake Merritt Tower foot print is 13,510 SF assuming a length of 193 and width of
70. Can you confirm those two dimensions are correct?
I have copied Christina Ferracane, planning staff for the Lake Merritt Plan, to this email, so she is aware of your
concerns that these recommended tower regulations will make middle-range, market-rate rental apartments
infeasible in the Oakland market.
As I understand from Christina, longer building lengths can be allowed with a CUP
This item will be heard next at the CED Committee on 10/28 (from 2 to 4pm). The related staff report for this
agenda item is not yet public, but I can track it and let you know about it once it is. So, at this point, I recommend
your team call and write a letter with your concerns to members of the City Council, especially those on the CED
committee (Reid, McElhaney, Schaaf, Kernighan). You should also plan to attend the 10/28 CED committee and
speak on this issue. After CED, this item is scheduled to be heard at City Council twice 11/5 and 11/18.
_____________________________________________
Hui-Chang Li
Hi Hui Chang
The enclosed area of our Lakeside Tower is actually about 12,750 sf.
I would like to point out, that 1200 Lakeshores footprint is 210 long and 75 wide, with a diagonal of about 225.
While it has about 13,000 sf of enclosed space, it has wrap-around balconies on all 4 sides, so its footprint is more
like 15,750 sf
I dont know where the Planning Commission is coming from on this issue, but I believe their recommendations will
produce infeasible projects for Oakland, or at best, they will work only for luxury condos, with only about 8 units per
floor at most. This wont work for middle-range, market-rate rental apartments which need at least 12 or more units
per floor to pay for all the structure, elevators, fire stairs and fire-fighting systems. This is the problem with studies
that refer to towers in places like San Francisco and Vancouver. Both are very high-end marketsthey simply dont
apply to Oaklands real estate conditions. The reality is that while the construction costs for such a building are the
same whether in Oakland or San Francisco, the rents or sales prices are lower in Oakland. Hence the need for a
different building type. Also, the staff recommendation of a maximum length of 150 will produce only about 10
units per floor.
Hi again Mike,
This is what I calculated based on the latest drawings you submitted. Could you help me confirm that this is
correct? Feel free to give me a call. Thank you!
Staff
Planning
Commission
recommended
October 8,
Lake Merrit
Blvd Apts @
12th St
Remainder
Parcel
size
% of site
recommendation
10,000 SF or 65%75% of site area
150'
180'
50'
2014
6,500 to 8,500
SF
90' to 100'
125'
115'
Parcel
13510
193.2
205
n/a
(acre)
area
40075.2
34%
Hi Mike,
If City Council decides to go with Planning Commission recommendations, then, yes the Lake Merritt Blvd Apts
would be subjected to these new rules. This agenda item (i.e. approval of Lake Merritt Station Area Plan and
associated FEIR and related zoning changes) goes to the CED Committee on 10/28. Staff is finalizing that staff
report today. Staff will have to show in the report to Council how these tower regulations would apply to the Lake
Merritt Blvd Apts.
So, can you do me a favor and fill in what the measurements are for Lake Merrit Blvd Apts in table below?
Staff is also considering including data on the last 3 towers that were built downtown Essex Ellington, and 100
Grand to show how those tower dimensions compare to the tower regulations that PC recommended.
Staff
recommendation
10,000 SF or
65%to 75% of site
area
150'
180'
50'
Planning
Commission
recommended
October 8, 2014
Lake Merritt
Blvd Apts @
12th St
Remainder
Parcel
6,500 to 8,500
SF
90' to 100'
125'
115'
_____________________________________________
Hui-Chang Li
These changes basically kill the financial feasibility of any towers for anywhere in Oakland. I am surprised
Hui-Chang Li
Below are the revised tower standards that were recommended by PC as a last-minute change last
night:
<image001.png>
I am conferring with Darin and Rachel, but I think that staff will clarify that we do not support the PCs
recommended changes. It would also be advisable for you to contact Urban Core, so they can express
their opinion about this to PC.
Christina Ferracane, Planner II | City of Oakland | Bureau of Planning | 250 Frank H. Ogawa, Suite
3315|Oakland, CA 94612 | Phone: (510)238-3903 | Fax: (510) 238-6538| Email:
cferracane@oaklandnet.com | Website: www.oaklandnet.com/planning
From: Chris Pattillo [mailto:pattillo@pgadesign.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2014 9:36 AM
To: Ferracane, Christina
Cc: Merkamp, Robert; Flynn, Rachel
Subject: Re: Lake Merritt BART Station Area Plan - Chinatown Coalition and OHA comments
Christina,
First I want to thank you for the pace of your presentation. I presume you were going through
things at a slow, even pace so that the translators could follow your presentation but I also
appreciated it. I was able to follow everything you said whereas frequently the staff presentations
are delivered with such speed it strains the brain to keep up. I also thought the content was right
on, clear and just the right amount of detail. Perfectly presented. Thank you.
With regard to the Tower Design Standards I was referring to the October 5, 2014
communication from OHA which had an attachment dated June 11, 2012 written by the
Coalition. The table with comparison data from Vancouver and San Francisco was in the
Coalition letter and the recommended heights I read into the record were actually in the OHA
President
PGAdesign
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS
444 17th Street
Oakland, CA 94612
Direct | 510.550.8855
Main | 510.465.1284
PGAdesign.com
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
Attachments:
Gray, Neil D.
Ronnie Turner
Li, Hui Chang; Michael Johnson
LMB Tower Draft Conditions of Approval
Wednesday, February 25, 2015 5:05:24 PM
Conditions of Approval.pdf
See Attached.
Neil Gray, Planner III | City of Oakland | Bureau of Planning | 250 Frank H. Ogawa, Suite 2114
|Oakland, CA 94612 | Phone: (510)238-3878 | Fax: (510) 238-4730 | Email: ngray@oaklandnet.com |
Website: www.oaklandnet.com/planning
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Attachments:
Michael Johnson
Michael Johnson
Mary Helen Rogers Senior Center - Grand Opening Celebration - October 28th
Thursday, October 17, 2013 8:56:08 PM
MHRSC invitationFinal.pdf
Please see the attached announcement, and join us if you can! See RSVP Contact.
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
jamesevann@aol.com
Li, Hui Chang
Meas DD Coalition -- re Meeting of Mon, Nov 17.
Friday, November 07, 2014 11:57:32 AM
Hello Hui,
Michael is framing the agenda for Nov 17 meeting.
I am hoping the response on the "remainder parcel" issue will be reported on either by you or me
(hopefully, the letter addressed to the Meas DD Subcommittee will be received and can be presented).
Do you plan to attend the meeting ?
If so, do you desire to be listed on the agenda ?
Are there updates you desire to report ?
Thanks,
James Vann, 763-0142
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
Attachments:
Naomi Schiff
Li, Hui Chang; Lane, Patrick; Estes, Lesley; Flynn, Rachel
Measure DD Community Coalition; JamesEVann@aol.com Vann
Measure DD Coalition,Regarding 12th Street Remainder Parcel
Wednesday, May 21, 2014 12:19:25 PM
DD COALITION-12th St Parcel-4-21-2014.pdf
ATT718308.txt
Hello!
Attached please find a letter from the Measure DD Community Coalition, expressing some concerns
about the 12th Street remainder parcel. Thank you!
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Nov 7, 2014
Dewey Academy in danger of displacement: Gentrification and the Oakland Unified School
District (Community Voices)
http://oaklandlocal.com/2014/06/dewey-academy-in-danger-of-displacement-gentrification-and-theoakland-unified-school-district-community-voices/
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
Attachments:
Hi Michael,
The report out to the Measure DD Coalition meeting Monday night went well. Here is link a to
meeting minutes, FYI, and also attached is written report from the subcommittee of our 7/17
meeting. While there were no additional comments on the design, do take note of the community
benefit asks on the last page from Meas DD group. In addition, a letter from the Oakland Tenant
Union has come to my attention (also attached).
In summary, OTU is asking the City to prohibit accruing "condominium conversion credits" on this
project (that a Developer would normally be allowed under the Citys condo conversion ordinance
if project is condo-mapped and rented out for the first 7 years) and a requirement that all tenants
be notified at the beginning of tenancy that the units are subject to being sold at any time at the
owner's discretion. (The latter point is not reflected in the attached letter but Mr. Vann elaborated
on this in subsequent emails to me).
Just to be clear, I am simply forwarding these letters to you right now as an FYI so you are kept in
the loop. I am not asking for a response from you at this point or stating a City position. I will
need to first coordinate the relevant City staff to meet internally to consider and discuss the issues
raised.
In terms of next steps, per ENA:
1. Updated project designs and applicable zoning applications due to Planning next week,
7/31 (I will remind relevant City staff to send any comments on the 7/15 drawings before
then).
2. We need to start planning the next Community Meeting, setting time, place and outreach,
which I will f/u on in a separate email
Thank you,
Hui-Chang Li
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Attachments:
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Attachments:
Michael,
I talked to Neil and he is telling me the level of drawing and detail is not enough for him to take
to PRAC (the attached drawing is what we have from July 2014).
I recall when your team met with staff and subcommittee of Measure DD to get additional
feedback in July, we provided the following comments:
I assumed by now you would have updated and refined drawings that reflect those comments.
So there are two options we see:
OPTION 1 provide more details to the attached drawing/park plan, as requested by Neil by 1/20,
so he can make the 1/23 staff deadline to be on PRAC agenda for 2/11
OPTION 2 Postpone going to PRAC for park approval until after Planning Commission approval
(i.e. April 8th). In this case, you would have to pay $2,906.13 for a separate minor CUP for the
park space.
Please let us know what you decide.
_____________________________________________
Hui-Chang Li
Hi Michael,
Can you provide plans that are somewhat conceptual? For instance, the types of plantings instead
of the exact species could be identified. We need something real for the PRAC to advise the
Planning Commission regarding the CUP. Another option may be to approve the project with a
condition that you return later and apply for the CUP for the park improvements. In this case, you
would have to pay $2,906.13 for a separate minor CUP for the park space. I am concerned that the
community would want to see the landscape plans prior to approval of the tower.
--Neil
Neil Gray, Planner III | City of Oakland | Bureau of Planning | 250 Frank H. Ogawa, Suite 2114
|Oakland, CA 94612 | Phone: (510)238-3878 | Fax: (510) 238-4730 | Email: ngray@oaklandnet.com |
Website: www.oaklandnet.com/planning
Neil, the folks at Pyatok informed me that you are requesting more
detailed Landscape Plans for the proposed park adjacent to our project. I
would like to ask if we can avoid this additional design work at this time.
This will require more investment by our team in advance of getting the
entitlements approved by the Planning Commission for the project, and
getting a DDA approved by the Council. I believe there is sufficient time
to have a detailed plan prepared with the City's and Commmunity input
after these two items are approved. The design concept currently can be
explained sufficiently by our landscape architects to the Parks & Rec
Committee, and we can ask them not for final approval, but just review
of the concept, and come back to them for a formal approval later.
Please consider this approach. Thanks for your consideration. We look
forward to hearing from you. Regards, Michael
_______________________
Michael E. Johnson, President
UrbanCore Development, LLC
4096 Piedmont Avenue
Suite 313
Oakland, CA 94611
c: (415) 748-2300
e: mjohnson@urbancorellc.com
www.urbancorellc.com
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
Karen Kunze
Pattillo, Chris; Moore, Jim; jahazielbonillaoaklandpc@gmail.com; Coleman, Michael;
jmyres.oakplanningcommission@gmail.com; nagrajplanning@gmail.com; EW.Oakland@gmail.com
Merkamp, Robert; Gray, Neil D.; Li, Hui Chang
PLN14266 Lake Merritt Blvd, 12th Street, 2nd Avenue,Lake Merritt Channel City Owned Parcel
Sunday, March 29, 2015 7:37:53 PM
I am writing to ask that the above development project be stopped. Here are my
concerns.
1. Three developers were given an opportunity to bid on the RFP for the proposed
development of this lot. No one has been able to explain how these three
developers were qualified and why they were the only three to be given an
opportunity. One of the three (who did not respond) are the owners of 1200
Lakeshore Blvd. There have been multiple attempts behind the scenes for the
owners of 1200 Lakeshore to get special privileges to convert the building to
condominium. Was including them in the special group of three who received the
RFP another opportunity? The process seems to be driven by the Citys need for
money and definitely not the best environmental design and construction needs of
the community. This is an abuse of the state laws granting cities the privilege of
landuse planning and zone. The RFP was issued before the Lake Merritt Station
Area Plan was even approved. This process has been flawed from the beginning.
2. Staff is categorizing this 24 story, 400,000 sq. ft. building with inadequate
parking as an infill project that is exempt from CEQA. There is nothing in this
proposal to justify granting an exception to the height and parking requirements.
Where in the City of Oakland do you have 293 residential units sitting on one acre of
land with inadequate parking? That alone is reason enough to reconsider the staff
recommendation you approve this project.
3. Staff has not required the developer to submit a Transportation Demand
Management (TDM) plan as part of the project, despite our request to see this
information. Withholding this type of information and/or delaying it until after
project approval goes against the intent of the CEQA legislation.
4. No one has been able to demonstrate that adequate soils studies have been
done to support the size and scale of the project. The report prepared by LSA
Associates assessing the environmental impacts acknowledges the general area is
very risky because of soil conditions and seismic issues. They state there have been
no soils problems on nearby lots to justify ordering a soils report at this point. You
merely have to look at the construction problems and developer bankruptcies
associated with the unanticipated problem of underestimating where bedrock was for
the pile driving portion of the construction. 1200 Lakeshore is less than 500 feet
from the proposed site. This alone needs to be fully understood prior to granting an
exemption to the CEQA standards.
5. The residents of 1200 Lakeshore have not received individual notice of this
project simply because they are renters. Staff acknowledges that if 1200 Lakeshore
was condominium, notices would have been provided. The owners of the building
have refused to use their email list to share information with the residents about the
project.
6. The first planning commission meeting on this project was cancelled at the last
minute due to the lack of a quorum. Three planning commissioners have a conflict
and cannot vote on the project. The rescheduled meeting has been set to be the
last item on the April 1st planning commission meeting, a meeting that was already
described by staff as a very full agenda. The proposed time as last on the agenda
was for the convenience of the three planning commissioners who have to recuse
themselves; not the public who have serious concerns.
7. We have asked the developer to have a meeting with residents (and neighbors)
of 1200 Lakeshore at the Methodist Church adjacent to our building to more fully air
concerns and get a better understanding of the project. The developers have
chosen not to respond to this request.
8. Residents of 1200 Lakeshore have already petitioned the City about our parking
problems and requested a neighborhood parking plan? What is happening with that
request? Additionally what is being done to mitigate for parking problems in the area
that will be significantly impacted by the size of this proposed development? The
nearly 300 units will have guests where will they park?
9. Sadly, the only logical reason the City is moving this project through with such
haste, is for the $4 million it anticipates receiving for the price of this city owned
parcel. It even appears that the height and parking exceptions being granted are all
tied to the City's budget problems. This is a terrible precedent and needs to be
stopped now.
Thank you
Karen Kunze
1200 Lakeshore Ave #10E
510-271-8355
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
Attachments:
All,
Please help to circulate announcement of this upcoming meeting at PRAC:
Ronnie to your email lists, including Oct 2013 community meeting and Jan 2015 community meeting (see contact
list attached here from Jan 20 2015 meeting)
Jennie to your District 2 listserv
Alicia to the LMSAP listserv
James to the Measure DD listserv.
Let me know if you have any questions.
Thank you, Hui-Chang
7RYLHZWKHDJHQGD UHODWHGVWDIIUHSRUWYLVLWKWWSZZZRDNODQGQHWFRP*RYHUQPHQWRRSUDSUDFLQGH[KWP
From:
To:
Bcc:
Subject:
Date:
7RYLHZWKH35$&DJHQGD UHODWHGVWDIIUHSRUW (Item 9A)YLVLW
KWWSZZZRDNODQGQHWFRP*RYHUQPHQWRRSUDSUDFLQGH[KWP
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
Hi Ronnie,
If I am understanding your email message correctly, I gather that, for this first upcoming meeting,
you will only be utilizing the stakeholder data provided by District 2 Council Office -- is that
correct?
Just to summarize, the City has provided your team the key contacts from 5 sources:
1) District 2 Office (refer to Jennies original email)
2) District 3 Office (Cleveland Heights list-serve: stevemawoodys@gmail.com and D3 listserve: bcook@oaklandnet.com)
3) Lake Merritt Station Area Plan contacts both email and snail mail addresses provided
4) Schilling Gardens contacts both email and snail mail addresses provided (for people who
were either interested in the Schilling Garden project or commented on the EIR)
5) Property owners within 1 mile and within 300 feet around the site -- snail mail addresses
only
This Oct 28th meeting is now less than two weeks away. If your team would rather not at this stage
of the project extend your outreach to those within a 300 feet radius of the site, I recommend you
at least email the meeting notice to all the above email addresses I have provided to you.
I will go ahead and get your notice to the District 3 list-serve. Will you be able to get the notice
out to all other email addresses by close of business today? (Please let me now if you need me
to resend you any of the contacts.)
Thanks,
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Hui-Chang Li
Urban Economic Analyst
the 1 mile and 300 foot radius per zoning; as potential addresses for outreach. Theres no email
addresses, but snail mail addresses, and the planning phase of programming for the project
technically has not started just yet until after our initial outreach effort. What we want as a team is
to present our concept and get feedback from stakeholders that reside on the east side of the lake
as a development team. We would like to proceed as efficiently and effectively in getting the word
out for our October 28 community meeting. With that being said, using the established work over
the past few years surrounding the Lake Merritt Area planning process, it is our understanding that
the interested stakeholders have been identified.
We are while aware of the outreach that councilperson Kernighan has done during the Lake Merritt
Area Plan process. We want to piggy-back on that outreach and utilize the electronic data to
communicate with stakeholders already identified from this work, and this has been provided by
Mandalyn from the councilpersons office. We want to engage those who have exhibited interest for
the development of the 12 th Street site. Utilizing the stakeholder data provided by District 2 Council
Office, this will better fulfill what will begin a well conceived outreach campaign for this initial
community meeting. So, what we are looking for is a consensus on moving forward with the best
tools to help achieve the results we all want to achieve in informing those most affected by the 12th
Street development. By having the continuity of this information from the previous efforts we wont
leave out the pertinent stakeholders to interact with throughout the planning entitlement process.
We will be able to best do that by using the list provided by the District 2, which I am sure will
overlap with the planning department legal radius list. And once we are fully engaged into the
planning process, the radius list will be fully utilized along with the clearly identified stakeholders
from our outreach efforts.
Best,
Michael,
Attached are two lists of property owners surrounding the site: one is a 1 mile radius, the
second is a 300 ft radius (the Citys standard noticing radius for Planning cases). This is just
property owners, and does not include individual addresses for units unless they are condos.
Did you decide on a date/plan for public meeting # 1 at your Thursday meeting?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Hui-Chang Li
Urban Economic Analyst
Hui Chang, thanks for all the info. I will review it all with our team at our
Thursday mtg. We will contact the various groups as appropriate. Then we will
get back to you with a proposed approach. Thx, Michael
Michael E. Johnson
President
UrbanCore-Integral, LLC
457 10th Street
San Francisco, CA 94103
(415) 748-2300 - Cell
(415) 553-4022 - Office
On Aug 20, 2013, at 5:19 PM, "Li, Hui Chang" <HLi@oaklandnet.com> wrote:
Michael,
[This is the 3rd email I am sending you containing contact info for
outreach of the first public meeting for the 12th St Parcel].
Attached is the e/mailing information for all the people who were
either interested in the Schilling Gardens project or commented on
the EIR.
(Background: Schilling Gardens is the project adjacent to Snow
Park. Opponents/historic preservation types/anti-high rise types of
this project were asking for the City to swap this site for the 12th St
Parcel in order to save the gardens/ prevent development on the
gardens.
http://oaklandwiki.org/Schilling_Gardens
Note: some on the attached mailing list might be ones who would be
opposed to development on the 12th St parcel too).
Heather Klein, (Planner for the Schlling Gardens site) recommends
that at a minimum that the following folks be notified:
<mime-attachment>
<ER06-0009-300' list 10-4-11.doc>
<Mailing Labels.doc>
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
Theresa Wallace
Li, Hui Chang
Gray, Neil D.; mjohnson@urbancorellc.com
RE: Lake Merritt Apartments Admin CE-2
Monday, November 17, 2014 5:41:22 PM
Hi Hui
I am sorry that I wasnt able to get back to you until earlier. Please see my responses below in green
From: Li, Hui Chang [mailto:HLi@oaklandnet.com]
Sent: Friday, November 14, 2014 3:57 PM
To: Theresa Wallace
Cc: NGray@oaklandnet.com; mjohnson@urbancorellc.com
Subject: Lake Merritt Apartments Admin CE-2
Hi Theresa,
I know that you are waiting to receive some comments from City staff about your Draft #2,
submitted on Oct 21st before working on incorporating those comments into your next deliverable,
the Screencheck Draft.
I also understand that you will be holding on this work until you receive outstanding payment from
UrbanCore, which I am hopeful will be coming soon.
In the meanwhile, could you please review the attached letter from the Measure DD Coalition and
let me know if you believe these items regarding the wind and shadow impacts from LMA are
already addressed in our current scope or not? (Measure DD Coalition is a community group who
is closely following the LMA project and its effects on the Measure DD funded-improvements and
on the experience of the Lake as a public asset in general.)
I discussed with Neil Gray and he think the items about the shadow study are already addressed in
our existing scope. We also think most of the wind study points that the DD Coalition is asking to
be studied are already covered as well, but perhaps not exactly. See my notes below in red below
about how the wind points in the study correspond to the points that the Coalition wants to see
studied.
Wind Study:
The Coalition desires that the Wind Study calculate wind speeds before and after (simulated)
construction of proposed Lake Merritt Tower Apartments for at least the following locations:
(a) several points on the surface of the lake - no points on surface of lake are studied.
Correct; however, I am not sure that there would be an impact on points within the lake since
there are no impacts aside from those immediately adjacent to the building. I will check with
the wind consultant on their opinion.
(b) the east side pedestrian pathway along the Channel at the line of the OUSD fence
corresponds with points 13 and 14
at both pathways under the center of the vehicle bridge already covered by points 38 and
39
(d) at the center of the north and south topside sidewalks of the vehicle bridge points 36
and 37 cover the south topside but not the north side. Again, same thoughts as with (a)
Hui-Chang Li
Wind Study:
The Coalition desires that the Wind Study calculate wind speeds before and after (simulated)
construction of proposed Lake Merritt Tower Apartments for at least the following locations:
(a) several points on the surface of the lake
(b) the east side pedestrian pathway along the Channel at the line of the OUSD fence
(c) at both pathways under the center of the vehicle bridge
(d) at the center of the north and south topside sidewalks of the vehicle bridge
(e) at the center of the bicycle-pedestrian bridge
(f) at the easterly portion of the 'passive park' area adjoining the project
(g) at the public sidewalk fronting the project along E 12th Street
Shadow Study:
The Coalition desires that the study provide Drawings to depict maximum shadows cast by the
proposed building during:
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
Importance: Tidal marsh plants require full sun. The Coalition desires to be informed if the new
building's height will cast more than minimum of shadows on the Tidal Marsh. Extended lengthy
shadows would affect the Marsh's restoration effort. Success of the Tidal Marsh is a requirement of
the City's permits with the U.S. Army Corps and the State Fish & Wildlife Agency.
Naomi Schiff
Joel Peter
James E Vann
Subcommittee for Coordination on Lake Merritt Boulevard Tower Apartments Project
Tel: 510.238.6239
Fax: 510.238.3691
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
Ferracane, Christina
Gray, Neil D.; Li, Hui Chang
Lane, Patrick; Manasse, Edward
RE: Lake Merritt Blvd Apartments
Monday, December 02, 2013 10:00:31 AM
Hi Neil and Hui Chang I received the below email from Ronnie Turner. Im hoping one of you can respond to him, since it
makes sense for one person to be the main point of contact. Im not sure which one of you that
should be. On the phone with him, I encouraged him to submit a pre-application and to get an
environmental consultant on board.
Regarding his question, we have not yet finalized all the details for the proposed zoning regulations,
so we cant answer his questions, and of course the proposals wont be final until theyre adopted
by Council. He was also asking what environmental analysis might be required for the Lake Merritt
Blvd apartments. That is also a question that we dont have a straightforward answer to, because of
course it depends on the project, some initial studies they would have to do, and any potential
changes in the environment.
Let me know if you have any thoughts or questions.
Christina Ferracane, Strategic Planning Division
City of Oakland | Planning, Building and Neighborhood Preservation
250 Frank H Ogawa Plaza, Ste 3315 | Oakland, CA 94612
T: (510) 238-3903 | Fax: (510) 238-6538 | cferracane@oaklandnet.com
www.oaklandnet.com/planning
From: Ronnie Turner [mailto:rtdevelops@comcast.net]
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 11:03 AM
To: Ferracane, Christina
Subject: Landmarks Preservation Advisory Board Mtg.
Hi Christina,
Per our conversation, architect Mike Pyatok responded to some of the zoning setbacks as outlined
from what was gathered from the LPAB meeting of November 18. If you can comment and provide
some direction as to what zoning will stay and what possibly will change that would be helpful. Youll
find Mikes comments within the thread of emails in Red.
Best,
Oakland, CA 94619
510.395.2766 Direct
510.250.0853 Fax
www.TurnerDevelopmentRG.com
From: Mike Pyatok [mailto:mpyatok@pyatok.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2013 11:11 AM
To: Ronnie Turner; 'Michael Johnson'; 'Faye Paulson'; 'Crystal Beverly'; 'Merlin Edwards'; Peter Waller;
'Doug Austin'
Subject: RE: Landmarks Preservation Advisory Board Mtg.
I noted some questions below in red where we will need some clarification.
-Michael Pyatok, FAIA
Principal
Pyatok Architects
510-465-7010 x118
mpyatok@pyatok.com
www.pyatok.com
From: Ronnie Turner [mailto:rtdevelops@comcast.net]
Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2013 10:30 AM
To: 'Michael Johnson'; 'Faye Paulson'; 'Crystal Beverly'; 'Merlin Edwards'; Mike Pyatok; Peter Waller;
'Doug Austin'
Subject: Landmarks Preservation Advisory Board Mtg.
Min. setback from Lake Merritt Estuary Channel is 100 ft (we dont have to be concerned
with the park acting as a buffer, but the OUSD property would be effected.) is 100
measured from the center of the estuary, or from the waterline (which varies with tidal
changes), or the top of the slope at the edge of the estuary?
Design Regulations
Ground floor commercial faade transparency is 65%.
Min. height of a ground floor that contains non-residential facilities is 15 ft.
Min. separation between the grade and ground floor living space is 2.5 ft.
Based within the DEIR are the number of residential units, 4,900, that are anticipated with the
opportunity sites identified within the LMSPA, and 700 of those are within the OUSD property. The
copy of the DEIR that is under comment through December is the version of November 13, 2013.
Not much has change from the December 2012 DEIR with some exceptions of amendments adopted
during 2013 and those are listed in the citys website for the DEIR. The transportation improvements
doesnt appear to impact our project with all that has already done with the creation of Lake Merritt
Boulevard and the improvements to East 12 th Street. The final plan and EIR will be completed for
the summer of 2014 and this was confirmed in another meeting with the city administrator and
assistant city administrator Fred Blackwell last week that the timeframe for the plan & EIR to be
voted on before the 2014 council recess.
The two opportunity sites that caught our attention were the Kaiser Auditorium and the OUSD
properties. The comments for both sites by the LPA were how the two sites will be perceived in
what is being considered adaptive re-use of the sites in the DEIR. An adaptive re-use of the Kaiser
Auditorium is understandable, but staff did let the LPA know that they may be overreaching for the
same distinction for the OUSD site that has been destine for demolition. I am not sure, but the final
comment seemed to be to have the OUSD sites studied at the time a project for the OUSD
properties came before the LPA for development.
Another interesting comment was to have larger projects finance the streetscape improvements for
smaller project areas by using impact fees. And in the staff report Project Alternatives in Chapter 4
of the DEIR it list five alternatives and the one that is most impactful for our project would be the
Enhanced Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Alternative. It calls for in this policy to
consider to reduce future trip generation, such as eliminating minimum parking requirements and
adding maximum parking requirements. It will be important to hear the feedback from the
upcoming Planning Commission meeting on the DEIR Nov. 20 on this matter and other planning
potential policies. Also, theres a public hearing meeting by the Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory
Committee Thursday, November 21, but we werent ask to attend this meeting by city staff.
I am looking forward to hearing how the Measure DD presentation and comments went last night?
510.395.2766 Direct
510.250.0853 Fax
www.TurnerDevelopmentRG.com
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
PS I forgot to say that I am looking for translation of the flyer into Chinese.
From: Li, Hui Chang
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2015 2:03 PM
To: Tam, May
Subject: FW: Lake Merritt Boulevard Apartments Project-Community Meeting January 20, 2015 6:30-8:00 p.m.
Hi May,
You presented at the Economic & Workforce Development staff meeting last month.
Can your office translate the attached flyer for me?
I need a pretty quick turnaround as we are looking to send notices out today.
Let me know what you can do.
Thank you!
_____________________________________________
Hui-Chang Li
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Attachments:
Importance:
Tam, May
Li, Hui Chang
RE: Lake Merritt Boulevard Apartments Project-Community Meeting January 20, 2015 6:30-8:00 p.m.
Tuesday, January 06, 2015 3:02:22 PM
EWD201501a CH Community Mtg.pdf
High
Hui Chang,
Without the source file, this is the best I can do. Please see attached.
May Tam
X2368
Human Resources . Equal Access
From: Tam, May
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2015 2:21 PM
To: Li, Hui Chang
Subject: RE: Lake Merritt Boulevard Apartments Project-Community Meeting January 20, 2015 6:30-8:00 p.m.
Importance: High
I will see what we can do, and try to get this back to you by the end of today.
Please keep in mind for future projects allow 2 weeks turn around time.
We are in the middle of a big translation project for HSD.
May Tam
X2368
Human Resources . Equal Access
From: Li, Hui Chang
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2015 2:03 PM
To: Tam, May
Subject: FW: Lake Merritt Boulevard Apartments Project-Community Meeting January 20, 2015 6:30-8:00 p.m.
Hi May,
You presented at the Economic & Workforce Development staff meeting last month.
Can your office translate the attached flyer for me?
I need a pretty quick turnaround as we are looking to send notices out today.
Let me know what you can do.
Thank you!
_____________________________________________
Hui-Chang Li
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
Estes, Lesley
Li, Hui Chang; Avery, Treva
Lau, David W; Lane, Patrick
RE: : 12th St Wedge Parcel Map sht 2&3
Wednesday, August 14, 2013 5:36:55 PM
Hi all,
Update: I just talked to Treva and we decided she will go ahead and process the current outstanding
bill from ARC for $53.14 to be paid from DD money but that I will provide the funding block for the
next bill, also related to the printing of mylars for the 12 th St Remainder Parcel (expected to be at
about $100). (Note: I expect to receive $25k from the prospective Developer of site but otherwise
do not have a budget/funds. If that doesnt work, perhaps we can figure out how Real Estate can
pay for the next ARC bill).
Thanks,
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Hui-Chang Li
Urban Economic Analyst
I have contacted Hui Chang regarding funding for this. She is working on it. I
believe in the meantime we can spend a bit of DD money on this as the parcel
was created as a result of the DD project.
Lesley Estes
Watershed and Stormwater Management
Department of Engineering
City of Oakland | Public Works Agency | APWA Accredited Agency
250 Frank Ogawa Plaza Suite 4314 | Oakland, CA 94612
(510) 238-7431 | (510) 238-7227 Fax
lestes@oaklandnet.com
Report A Problem | Public Works Agency Call Center | (510) 615-5566
www.oaklandpw.com | pwacallcenter@oaklandnet.com | Mobile app: SeeClickFix
FYI
From: Hayes, Gil
Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2013 12:41 PM
To: Avery, Treva
Subject: Re: 12th St Wedge Parcel Map sht 2&3
This is not an expense that survey or PE should pay. The successor agency is responsible for these
costs
Sent
Hi Lesley:
I need a little bit of help. It is my understanding that Anthony is waiting on a funding
code to charge, to have the final PDFs printed on mylar for the Wedge Parcel Map. I
cannot process the map until it goes to mylar. We had the cover sheet processed last
week because I wanted to get Mike Nearys signature before he went on vacation, but I
still need pages 2 and 3 printed on mylar. ARC provided the cover sheet last week.
Under normal circumstances, we have a roll of mylar tucked away that we can mount
and print ourselves but we are out the stock. If you could give Anthony the funding
code we can at least get the mylar printed and keep City Council happy that we are
moving on this map. I will be in the field today, but may be reached on my cell phone
if you wish. Thank you in advance for your help.
BR,
Ray
Raymond R. Hbert, LS
Chief of Party
Department of Engineering and Construction, Project Delivery Division
City of Oakland | Public Works Agency | APWA Accredited Agency
Cell (510) 715-7097
250 Frank Ogawa Plaza, 4th Floor | Oakland, CA 94612
(510) 238-7269 | (510) 238-6633 Fax
rhebert@oaklandnet.com
Anthony,
Please have ARC provide 2 copiers of each pdf. sheet 2 and sheet 3, ploted on 18"X26"
mylar. ASAP
Thank you
Kenen K. Pierce L.S.I.T.
Sr. Survey Tech.
City of Oakland Project Delivery Division
250 Frank H. Ogawa Plaza 4th Floor
Oakland, CA 94612
Ph (510)238-3343, Fx (510)238-6633
kpierce@oaklandnet.com
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
Hi James,
Could you please follow up with Gil Hayes about the reimbursement of $5,000 to the
survey group for a portion of the work over the last two years via the escrow process for the
sale of the wedge. (It may be that when the source of funding is identified, Dorothy
Reynoso will have to coordinate with Nila Wong to make this transfer happen).
It was my understanding from our meeting about this topic 3 weeks ago that you will take
the lead from here to hire the Title Company and pay for the $5K from Real Estate budget
(as well as pay for the outstanding bill on the mylars, which I believe has since been taken
care of).
Thank you,
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Hui-Chang Li
Urban Economic Analyst
Patrick:
Just a follow up to our meeting yesterday in which I gave you the original, yet-to-berecorded, and completed (now signed almost by all necessary parties) map for the
Wedge. This map, once recorded, will legally create the parcel which can, in turn, be
sold or conveyed as necessary. To complete this process you will need to have your
title company assist. As part of their process they will need to:
Pick up the map from your offices
Prepare copies and tax waiver certificates as required by the County of
Alameda. With these completed the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors will sign
and seal the map.
Record the map with the County Recorder. Note that there are TWO original
copies of the map. The Clerk of the Recorders office will pick either copy for
County processing and will prepare the other map as a Conforming Copy.
This Conforming copy is to be returned to my office for our records.
In addition to this, the Title company should provide an electronic (.PDF) copy
of the recorded document to yourself and to my office. From this PDF we can
run as many copies as may be required for your subsequent sale or transfer.
Once recorded, please note that the LEGAL description of the wedge will be: Parcel
Two of Parcel Map 10111, as recorded in the office of the Recorder for the County
of Alameda, (followed by the recording data of date , book, and page). A metes
and bounds description should not be used to insure that the easement information on
the map is conveyed to buyers
In addition, I have asked that $5,000 be reimbursed to the survey group for a portion
of the work over the last two years via the escrow process of the sale. This should be
coordinated thru Nila Wong so that it gets deposited (however) into the correct
account.
Hopefully (from my end) it is
finally
done.
GILBERT E. HAYES, PS
- City Surveyor
Confidentiality Notice: This electronic mail transmission may contain privileged information and/or confidential
information only for use by the intended recipients. Any usage, distribution, copying or disclosure by any other
person other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited and may be subject to civil action and/or criminal
penalties. If you have received this e-mail transmission in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail or by
telephone and delete the transmission
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
Attachments:
Golde, James
Li, Hui Chang
Lane, Patrick
RE: "The Wedge"
Friday, August 16, 2013 2:51:56 PM
AlaTaxQ The Wedge PM 10111 1117013448.docx
JamesGolde
Thanks
I met with James Golde and gave him the maps. I will work with him to have them recorded.
Patrick Lane [mailto:pslane@oaklandnet.com]
Redevelopment Manager, City Of Oakland
Office of Neighborhood Investment
250 Frank H. Ogawa Plaza, Suite 5313
Oakland CA 94612
tel (510) 238-7362
fax (510) 238-3691
From: Hayes, Gil
Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2013 10:01 AM
To: Lane, Patrick
Cc: Li, Hui Chang; Estes, Lesley; Hbert, Raymond; Lau, David W; Golde, James; Neary, Mike
Subject: "The Wedge"
Patrick:
Just a follow up to our meeting yesterday in which I gave you the original, yet-to-berecorded, and completed (now signed almost by all necessary parties) map for the
Wedge. This map, once recorded, will legally create the parcel which can, in turn, be
sold or conveyed as necessary. To complete this process you will need to have your
title company assist. As part of their process they will need to:
Pick up the map from your offices
Prepare copies and tax waiver certificates as required by the County of
Alameda. With these completed the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors will sign
and seal the map.
Record the map with the County Recorder. Note that there are TWO original
copies of the map. The Clerk of the Recorders office will pick either copy for
County processing and will prepare the other map as a Conforming Copy.
This Conforming copy is to be returned to my office for our records.
In addition to this, the Title company should provide an electronic (.PDF) copy
of the recorded document to yourself and to my office. From this PDF we can
run as many copies as may be required for your subsequent sale or transfer.
Once recorded, please note that the LEGAL description of the wedge will be: Parcel
Two of Parcel Map 10111, as recorded in the office of the Recorder for the County
of Alameda, (followed by the recording data of date , book, and page). A metes
and bounds description should not be used to insure that the easement information on
the map is conveyed to buyers
In addition, I have asked that $5,000 be reimbursed to the survey group for a portion
of the work over the last two years via the escrow process of the sale. This should be
coordinated thru Nila Wong so that it gets deposited (however) into the correct
account.
Hopefully (from my end) it is
finally
done.
GILBERT E. HAYES, PS
- City Surveyor
Confidentiality Notice: This electronic mail transmission may contain privileged information and/or confidential
information only for use by the intended recipients. Any usage, distribution, copying or disclosure by any other
person other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited and may be subject to civil action and/or criminal
penalties. If you have received this e-mail transmission in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail or by
telephone and delete the transmission
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Note to self:
Met with Patrick and James and James Real Estate dept will take care of all this hire the
Title Company and pay for the $5K from Real Estate budget as well as pay for outstanding bill
on the mylars.
Patrick,
Can we talk about what is my role, if any, in this? Do you want me to correspond with the
title company or you got that? (will you copy me on emails to title company Neils? so that
I can learn about the process).
Also, how will the $5K that Gil is asking for be paid?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Hui-Chang Li
Urban Economic Analyst
Patrick:
Just a follow up to our meeting yesterday in which I gave you the original, yet-to-berecorded, and completed (now signed almost by all necessary parties) map for the
Wedge. This map, once recorded, will legally create the parcel which can, in turn, be
sold or conveyed as necessary. To complete this process you will need to have your
title company assist. As part of their process they will need to:
Pick up the map from your offices
Prepare copies and tax waiver certificates as required by the County of
Alameda. With these completed the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors will sign
and seal the map.
Record the map with the County Recorder. Note that there are TWO original
copies of the map. The Clerk of the Recorders office will pick either copy for
County processing and will prepare the other map as a Conforming Copy.
This Conforming copy is to be returned to my office for our records.
In addition to this, the Title company should provide an electronic (.PDF) copy
of the recorded document to yourself and to my office. From this PDF we can
run as many copies as may be required for your subsequent sale or transfer.
Once recorded, please note that the LEGAL description of the wedge will be: Parcel
Two of Parcel Map 10111, as recorded in the office of the Recorder for the County
of Alameda, (followed by the recording data of date , book, and page). A metes
and bounds description should not be used to insure that the easement information on
the map is conveyed to buyers
In addition, I have asked that $5,000 be reimbursed to the survey group for a portion
of the work over the last two years via the escrow process of the sale. This should be
coordinated thru Nila Wong so that it gets deposited (however) into the correct
account.
Hopefully (from my end) it is
finally
done.
GILBERT E. HAYES, PS
- City Surveyor
Confidentiality Notice: This electronic mail transmission may contain privileged information and/or confidential
information only for use by the intended recipients. Any usage, distribution, copying or disclosure by any other
person other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited and may be subject to civil action and/or criminal
penalties. If you have received this e-mail transmission in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail or by
telephone and delete the transmission
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
Golde, James
Li, Hui Chang
Lane, Patrick; Hayes, Gil; Estes, Lesley; Wong, Nila; Reynoso, Dorothy
RE: "The Wedge"
Tuesday, September 03, 2013 4:20:38 PM
JamesGolde
Hi James,
Could you please follow up with Gil Hayes about the reimbursement of $5,000 to the
survey group for a portion of the work over the last two years via the escrow process for the
sale of the wedge. (It may be that when the source of funding is identified, Dorothy
Reynoso will have to coordinate with Nila Wong to make this transfer happen).
It was my understanding from our meeting about this topic 3 weeks ago that you will take
the lead from here to hire the Title Company and pay for the $5K from Real Estate budget
(as well as pay for the outstanding bill on the mylars, which I believe has since been taken
care of).
Thank you,
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Hui-Chang Li
Urban Economic Analyst
Patrick:
Just a follow up to our meeting yesterday in which I gave you the original, yet-to-be-
recorded, and completed (now signed almost by all necessary parties) map for the
Wedge. This map, once recorded, will legally create the parcel which can, in turn, be
sold or conveyed as necessary. To complete this process you will need to have your
title company assist. As part of their process they will need to:
Pick up the map from your offices
Prepare copies and tax waiver certificates as required by the County of
Alameda. With these completed the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors will sign
and seal the map.
Record the map with the County Recorder. Note that there are TWO original
copies of the map. The Clerk of the Recorders office will pick either copy for
County processing and will prepare the other map as a Conforming Copy.
This Conforming copy is to be returned to my office for our records.
In addition to this, the Title company should provide an electronic (.PDF) copy
of the recorded document to yourself and to my office. From this PDF we can
run as many copies as may be required for your subsequent sale or transfer.
Once recorded, please note that the LEGAL description of the wedge will be: Parcel
Two of Parcel Map 10111, as recorded in the office of the Recorder for the County
of Alameda, (followed by the recording data of date , book, and page). A metes
and bounds description should not be used to insure that the easement information on
the map is conveyed to buyers
In addition, I have asked that $5,000 be reimbursed to the survey group for a portion
of the work over the last two years via the escrow process of the sale. This should be
coordinated thru Nila Wong so that it gets deposited (however) into the correct
account.
Hopefully (from my end) it is
finally
done.
GILBERT E. HAYES, PS
- City Surveyor
Confidentiality Notice: This electronic mail transmission may contain privileged information and/or confidential
information only for use by the intended recipients. Any usage, distribution, copying or disclosure by any other
person other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited and may be subject to civil action and/or criminal
penalties. If you have received this e-mail transmission in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail or by
telephone and delete the transmission
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Gray, Neil D.
Li, Hui Chang
RE: 3-18-15 PC Staff report LMB.doc
Tuesday, March 03, 2015 4:55:34 PM
I clarified that the two story podium does not include the underground garage.
Sorry for not mentioning it.
Neil Gray, Planner III | City of Oakland | Bureau of Planning | 250 Frank H. Ogawa, Suite 2114
|Oakland, CA 94612 | Phone: (510)238-3878 | Fax: (510) 238-4730 | Email: ngray@oaklandnet.com |
Website: www.oaklandnet.com/planning
Thanks!
Neil Gray, Planner III | City of Oakland | Bureau of Planning | 250 Frank H. Ogawa, Suite 2114
|Oakland, CA 94612 | Phone: (510)238-3878 | Fax: (510) 238-4730 | Email: ngray@oaklandnet.com |
Website: www.oaklandnet.com/planning
received from that meeting and followed up with a presentation at the November 18,
2013 meeting of the Measure DD Coalition, a regular and broadly publicized meeting that
is open to the public. Most recently, the developer hosted a meeting on January 20, 2015 to
present the latest version of their projects description and design.
3. On Pg 10, under the Community Benefits section, I noticed two sentences missing the
words highlighted below:
without taking into account the inclusion of affordable housing
and, according to the Redevelopment Successor Agency, the only property
held
(Actually, I think you should delete reference to ORSA b/c I worry it might confuse
the issue of the history of this propertys ownership which there is no mention of in
this staff report).
_____________________________________________
Hui-Chang Li
Attached is a draft of the staff report per your request. This is a draft version that is subject to
change.
--Neil
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Importance:
Todd, Amber
Li, Hui Chang
RE: 12th St DDA - supplemental report for 4/21
Wednesday, April 08, 2015 10:28:58 AM
High
Get me what you can by Monday April 13 th as we would go to print by Thursday the 16 th . Work
with you attorney to see if they require a short reason for Supplemental report to explain what was
changed.
Thank you,
Amber Todd
City Administrator Analyst
Office of the City Administrator
City of Oakland
(510) 238-6369
atodd@oakalndnet.com
Hi Amber,
Based on ongoing negotiations, I expect that I will need to do a supplemental report for the 12th St
DDA that will reflect changes I expect will be recommended by CED on 4/14. These changes will
be to the Ordinance title and content and Exhibit A DDA term sheet.
Please remind me - what are the various items I will need to get to you and what are the
deadlines, if the goal is a supplemental report by the 4/21 City Council date to reflect changes
introduced on 4/14 CED?
Thanks,
_____________________________________________
Hui-Chang Li
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
Farmer, Casey
Li, Hui Chang
Wald, Zachary
RE: 12th St Parcel - OUTREACH LIST
Wednesday, August 21, 2013 5:36:10 PM
Yes please send the info to Brigitte for our Downtown/Lake Yahoo group, which goes out each
Friday.
I am not sure that Adams Point residents will take an interest in this but they have a facebook
group you can send it through.
From: Li, Hui Chang
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2013 5:31 PM
To: Farmer, Casey
Cc: Wald, Zachary
Subject: RE: 12th St Parcel - OUTREACH LIST
Thanks, Casey.
Jennie Girard covered the various groups in D2. Just to be clear, I am asking you about the key
groups near the Lake in D3, e.g. Gold Cost or Adams Point (not near the subject site/Cleveland
heights, which is in D2).
I will keep you in the loop about the outreach plan and at a minimum will probably be asking you
to include the announcement for the public meeting on your D3 email blasts when that date is set.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Hui-Chang Li
Urban Economic Analyst
Hi all,
I think Jennie Girard or Mandalynn Mendoza from the D2 staff may have more contacts in this area.
Sometimes large buildings, like 1200 Lakeshore, have list-servs or the property managers send
information so you might call or visit them.
This is a tricky area since its between a few official neighborhoods like Eastlake, Laney,
Chinatown, Lakeshore, etc. There is a Cleveland Heights list-serve which you could contact Steve
about: stevemawoodys@gmail.com (I dont know if there is interest from this neighborhood, as its
slightly removed, but its worth a shot).
I think that door-to-door outreach would be more effective here as many of the local buildings are
of non-English speakers or senior residences. Its not our district, so I dont have contacts for any of
these neighboring buildings.
Best,
Casey
From: Wald, Zachary
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2013 10:15 AM
To: Li, Hui Chang
Cc: Michael Johnson (mjohnson@urbancorellc.com); Farmer, Casey
Subject: RE: 12th St Parcel - OUTREACH LIST
Hui Chang
Thats good to know. Casey Farmer will be able to supply our contacts for the area.
Zac
From: Li, Hui Chang
Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2013 5:06 PM
To: Wald, Zachary
Cc: Michael Johnson (mjohnson@urbancorellc.com)
Subject: 12th St Parcel - OUTREACH LIST
Hi Zac,
UrbanCore-Integral or UCI, the Developer holding an ENA with the City on the 12th St
Remainder Parcel located in District 2, is getting ready to host its first public community meeting
to present their proposal, design, program. They are thinking about scheduling this for mid/late
September, after the market feasibility study (currently underway) is complete (expected early
September). [I have copied Michael Johnson, principal of Urban Core, to this email].
I am helping to coordinate the outreach for this first public meeting. I reached out to Christina
Ferracane (Planner for the Lake Merritt Station Area Plan) and Heather Klein (Planner for the
Schilling Gardens Site in District 3) as well as District 2 Office to provide key contacts for this
outreach.
Both Christina and Heather passed on e/mail distribution lists and key stakeholder contacts for
their respective projects and the D2 office forwarded key contacts as well. In addition, a list of
property owners and mailing addresses within a ~ 1 mile buffer around the site will be provided to
UCI. I think that should about cover it, but thought I should also check in with you about any
group/one we must NOT miss. Although this site is in D2, I am thinking there may be interested
people/groups in D3 located around/near the Lake that should be included as well.
The goal is to make sure there is broad outreach and adequate/advance notice for this first public
meeting.
Are there key contacts that you could pass on to be included this outreach?
Thanks in advance!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Hui-Chang Li
Urban Economic Analyst
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
Farmer, Casey
Wald, Zachary; Li, Hui Chang
"Michael Johnson (mjohnson@urbancorellc.com)"
RE: 12th St Parcel - OUTREACH LIST
Wednesday, August 21, 2013 12:39:39 PM
Hi all,
I think Jennie Girard or Mandalynn Mendoza from the D2 staff may have more contacts in this area.
Sometimes large buildings, like 1200 Lakeshore, have list-servs or the property managers send
information so you might call or visit them.
This is a tricky area since its between a few official neighborhoods like Eastlake, Laney,
Chinatown, Lakeshore, etc. There is a Cleveland Heights list-serve which you could contact Steve
about: stevemawoodys@gmail.com (I dont know if there is interest from this neighborhood, as its
slightly removed, but its worth a shot).
I think that door-to-door outreach would be more effective here as many of the local buildings are
of non-English speakers or senior residences. Its not our district, so I dont have contacts for any of
these neighboring buildings.
Best,
Casey
From: Wald, Zachary
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2013 10:15 AM
To: Li, Hui Chang
Cc: Michael Johnson (mjohnson@urbancorellc.com); Farmer, Casey
Subject: RE: 12th St Parcel - OUTREACH LIST
Hui Chang
Thats good to know. Casey Farmer will be able to supply our contacts for the area.
Zac
From: Li, Hui Chang
Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2013 5:06 PM
To: Wald, Zachary
Cc: Michael Johnson (mjohnson@urbancorellc.com)
Subject: 12th St Parcel - OUTREACH LIST
Hi Zac,
UrbanCore-Integral or UCI, the Developer holding an ENA with the City on the 12th St
Remainder Parcel located in District 2, is getting ready to host its first public community meeting
to present their proposal, design, program. They are thinking about scheduling this for mid/late
September, after the market feasibility study (currently underway) is complete (expected early
September). [I have copied Michael Johnson, principal of Urban Core, to this email].
I am helping to coordinate the outreach for this first public meeting. I reached out to Christina
Ferracane (Planner for the Lake Merritt Station Area Plan) and Heather Klein (Planner for the
Schilling Gardens Site in District 3) as well as District 2 Office to provide key contacts for this
outreach.
Both Christina and Heather passed on e/mail distribution lists and key stakeholder contacts for
their respective projects and the D2 office forwarded key contacts as well. In addition, a list of
property owners and mailing addresses within a ~ 1 mile buffer around the site will be provided to
UCI. I think that should about cover it, but thought I should also check in with you about any
group/one we must NOT miss. Although this site is in D2, I am thinking there may be interested
people/groups in D3 located around/near the Lake that should be included as well.
The goal is to make sure there is broad outreach and adequate/advance notice for this first public
meeting.
Are there key contacts that you could pass on to be included this outreach?
Thanks in advance!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Hui-Chang Li
Urban Economic Analyst
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Klein, Heather
Li, Hui Chang
RE: 12th St Parcel - OUTREACH LIST
Tuesday, August 20, 2013 3:11:30 PM
I can give you my e-mail and mailing distribution lists if you want them but there are a LOT of people
on those. Let me know if you want those; however, you might want to limit the distribution to the
following which constitute just groups.
Oakland Heritage Alliance info@oaklandheritagealliance.org 446 17 th Street, Suite 301, Oakland
CA 94612
Coalition of Advocates for Lake Merritt c/o 251 Wayne Ave, Oakland CA 94612
Golden Gate Audubon Society 2530 San Pablo Ave, Suite G, Berkeley, CA 94702
Heather Klein, CGBP, LEED AP
Planner III
City of Oakland
250 Frank H Ogawa Plaza, Suite 3315
Oakland, CA 94612
ph: (510)238-3659
fax: (510)238-6538
email: hklein@oaklandnet.com
Hi Heather,
The Developer of the 12th St Parcel (UrbanCore-Integral or UCI) is getting ready to host its first
public community meeting to present their proposal, design, program. They are thinking about
scheduling this for mid/late September, after their market feasibility study (currently underway) is
complete (expected early September).
I am helping to coordinate the outreach for this first public meeting. I reached out to Christina
Ferracane and both the D2 and D3 offices to provide key contacts for this outreach.
Christina passed on the email distribution lists and key stakeholder contacts for the LMSAP and
the D2 office forwarded some key contacts as well. In addition, a list of property owners (and
mailing addresses) within a certain buffer around the site will be provided to the Developer. I think
that should about cover it, but then I remembered I should check in with you about anyone we
must NOT miss. I have in mind the various key people following/anti- the Schilling Gardens
development.
The goal is to make sure there is broad outreach and adequate/advance notice for this first public
meeting.
Are there key contacts that you could pass on to be included this outreach?
Thanks in advance!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Hui-Chang Li
Urban Economic Analyst
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
Michael Johnson
Li, Hui Chang
Merlin Edwards; Ronnie Turner; Michael Pyatok; Peter Waller
Re: 12th St Parcel - OUTREACH LIST
Monday, August 26, 2013 12:06:22 PM
Thanks for the info. We met last week to discuss the meeting. We are trying to figure
out a date and location this week, and will let you know asap. Thanks, MJ
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Li, Hui Chang <HLi@oaklandnet.com> wrote:
Michael,
Attached are two lists of property owners surrounding the site: one is a 1 mile radius, the
second is a 300 ft radius (the Citys standard noticing radius for Planning cases). This is
just property owners, and does not include individual addresses for units unless they are
condos.
Did you decide on a date/plan for public meeting # 1 at your Thursday meeting?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Hui-Chang Li
Urban Economic Analyst
Tel 510-238-6239
Merlin
Hui Chang, thanks for all the info. I will review it all with our team at
our Thursday mtg. We will contact the various groups as appropriate.
Then we will get back to you with a proposed approach. Thx, Michael
Michael E. Johnson
President
UrbanCore-Integral, LLC
457 10th Street
San Francisco, CA 94103
(415) 748-2300 - Cell
(415) 553-4022 - Office
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Hui-Chang Li
Urban Economic Analyst
<mime-attachment>
<ER06-0009-300' list 10-4-11.doc>
<Mailing Labels.doc>