Professional Documents
Culture Documents
New Delhi-110001
2012
To my beloved students
CONTENTS
Preface xi
Appendices
Appendix A: Conversion Factors and Fundamental Units 193
Appendix B: Gas Law Constant R 198
Appendix C: Properties of Water (Liquid) 199
Appendix D: Properties of Liquids 202
Appendix E: Properties of Gases 204
Appendix F: Properties of Solids 207
Appendix G: The Equation of Continuity 209
Appendix H: Equation of Motion for a Newtonian Fluid withConstants r and m 210
Appendix I: The Equation of Energy for Pure Newtonian Fluidswith Constants r and k 212
Appendix J: Ficks (First) Law of Binary Diffusion 213
Appendix K: The Equation of Continuity for Species a in Terms of ja 215
Index 217218
Preface
Transport Phenomena is a subject of interest to many scientists and engineers in their respective
fields of study. This subject, apart from being of prime interest to chemical engineers, is also
increasingly gaining popularity and application in the fields of agriculture, biology, biotechnology,
nanotechnology and micro-electronics.
The subject of transport phenomena covers mainly three aspects: momentum transfer (also known as
fluid dynamics), heat transfer and mass transfer. In the field of chemical engineering, the fluid
dynamics or momentum transfer occurs in industrial operations such as mixing, sedimentation, fluid
flow and filtration. Heat transfer occurs in conduction and in convection transfer of heat during
evaporation and drying, whereas mass transfer takes place in operations such as distillation,
absorption, chemical reactions, liquidliquid extraction, crystallization and adsorption.
Generally a question is asked, why do we need to study these three phenomena together? There are
reasons for it. Let us take a simple process where the raw materials are transported from the storage
vessel to the reactor. So, the fluid flow phenomenon comes into the picture. Then, if the reaction in the
reactor takes place at high temperatures (generally that happens), then the raw materials have to be
heated. After the reaction, the separation processes take place with a view to isolating the product in
pure form. The mass transfer operations such as distillation, absorption or crystallization may also
take place. In other words, all these three transport phenomena take place. So, the subject of transport
phenomena should be studied together on account of the following reasons:
1. The mechanisms of these three transport phenomena are closely related. Also, the governing
mathematical equations are similar in nature.
2. By analogies, we can understand one transport phenomenon from another. For example, we
can understand mass transfer or heat transfer from momentum transfer.
There are many books and literature available which cover these three topics separately. But there
are only a few books on the market which cover all the topics together. The subject has grown rapidly
in the recent past. It is not possible to cover all the aspects of the subject in one book of this size. So,
this book covers only the introductory part to the subject. Moreover, in many universities and
engineering colleges including Indian Institutes of Technology, this subject is taught at two levels, i.e.
introductory level and advanced level. This book caters to the needs of the introductory level.
An attempt has been made in this book to explain the phenomena of momentum transfer, heat transfer
and mass transfer by flux expressions. Another approach adopted is to write shell balances for these
transfer processes. The partial differential equations so obtained are solved using the boundary
conditions. The one-dimensional equations evolved are taken up in all the examples. The expressions
for the conservation of momentum, heat and mass are also developed.
Since it is an introductory book, care has been taken to use simple mathematical expressions and also
to provide complete solutions of the problems. Students are expected to have a good knowledge of
differential equations and methods of integration. Since there are many similarities in molecular
transport of momentum, heat or mass, analogies among these three transport processes are also
demonstrated to understand them better.
This book is an outgrowth of my interactions with the students during class work and tutorials. Simple
illustrations and mathematical tools have been adopted to explain the transport phenomena in order to
fulfil the needs of the students.
This book is divided into four sections:
Section A: Momentum Transfer
Section B: Heat Transfer
Section C: Mass Transfer
Section D: Analogies among Momentum, Head and Mass Transfer.
Section A: Momentum Transfer (Chapters 1 to 5)
In Chapter 1, the basic law of momentum transfer, namely the Newtons law of viscosity, is covered.
The mechanism of momentum transfer is explained. The shell momentum balance for momentum
transfer is also covered. Chapter 2 deals with the typical cases for shell momentum balance in order
to obtain the velocity distribution and momentum flux for laminar flow conditions. The general
equation of continuity and the equation of motion are explained in Chapter 3. Momentum transfer in
turbulent flow conditions is explained in Chapter 4. The various models like the Prandtl mixing length
are also covered in this chapter. The unsteady-state flow of Newtonian fluids is explained in Chapter
5.
Section B: Heat Transfer (Chapters 6 to 10)
The mechanism of molecular heat conduction is discussed in Chapter 6. It explains the Fouriers law
of heat conduction. In this chapter, convective energy transport and shell energy balances are also
discussed. Specific problems of heat conduction in solids are highlighted in Chapter 7. These
problems are solved by taking shell energy balances. The general energy equation is developed in
Chapter 8. The temperature distribution in turbulent flow conditions is dealt with in Chapter 9. The
unsteady-state case of heat transfer in conduction is discussed in Chapter 10.
Section C: Mass Transfer (Chapters 11 to 15)
The governing law of molecular mass transfer is explained in Chapter 11, which covers the Ficks
law of diffusion. In this chapter, convective mass transfer and shell mass balances are also covered.
Simple problems for mass transfer are discussed in Chapter 12 by taking shell mass balances for
laminar flow conditions. The general equation of diffusion is explained in Chapter 13. Mass transfer
in turbulent flow condition is discussed in Chapter 14. A specific case of diffusion for the unsteadystate condition is explained in Chapter 15.
Section D: Analogies among Momentum, Heat and Mass Transfer (Chapters 16)
The mechanism and governing equations for momentum, heat and mass transfer are discussed in
Chapter 16. Different analogies like Reynolds, Prandtl, von Krmn and ChiltonColburn are
explained in this chapter.
This introductory book on transport phenomena will go a long way to cater to the needs of the
students. Constructive suggestions from readers, teachers, students and well wishers to improve this
first edition of the book will be gratefully acknowledged.
BODH RAJ
E-mail: dr.bodhraj@yahoo.com
Section A
MOMENTUM TRANSFER
1
INTRODUCTION TOMOMENTUM
TRANSFER
The matter consists of a multitude of extremely small particles called molecules, and matter may be
divided into three different classes of substances or states, i.e. solids, liquids and gases. In gases, the
molecules have more free space between them compared to the molecules in liquids. In solids, the
molecules are arranged in a packed fashion. The behaviour or the movement of the matter can be
studied at the molecular level, i.e. microscopically or it can be studied macroscopically at the bulk
level. The scientist studies the properties of matter at the molecular level, whereas in engineering
applications we are concerned with the study of the bulk or macroscopic behaviour of solids, liquids
and gases rather than their molecular behaviour.
While studying engineering applications, we generally ask two questions. One, how does a particular
phenomenon take place? Second, why does it take place? The same is the case when we deal with
momentum transfer. When the molecule of a fluid moves, it carries some momentum with it as the
mass of the molecule moves with a certain velocity in a particular direction. Why does the molecule
move? It moves because of velocity gradient in the system. We can, therefore, write a general
statement such as
rate of transfer process =
. . . (1.1)
In momentum transfer, the driving force is the difference in velocities. Thus, molecules move because
of velocity gradient.
Now, the unit of momentum is given by
momentum = mass velocity
= kg m/s
whereas that for momentum flux is given by
momentum flux = rate of momentum per unit area
Similarly, the transfer of heat energy takes place because of temperature gradient and mass transfer
takes place because of concentration gradient. The heat and mass transfers will be discussed in detail
in subsequent chapters.
Momentum, heat and mass transfer phenomena take place by two means:
1. Molecular transfer
2. Convective transfer
Now, let us discuss these two mechanisms in detail.
As shown in Figure 1.1, suppose there is a fire to be extinguished at a particular place. Let us also
assume that there is a water pond in the vicinity. There are three different modes available to us to
extinguish the fire.
Mode I: Allow all men to stand in a queue and let the first person fill up the bucket of water and pass
it on to the next person, and so on. In this way, water will be transported to the fire place and used to
extinguish the fire. Here all men remain stationary but the bucket of water keeps moving.
Mode II: In this case, each man is allowed to fill up the bucket with water from the pond. Each man
carries the water bucket to the fire place. Here both men and buckets of water remain moving. Men
are moving carrying the buckets of water.
Mode III: We install a pump to spray water from the pond onto the fire.
Let us analyse the above mechanisms in a scientific way. In Mode I, men are stationary but the bucket
of water is moving from one man to another. A similar type of mechanism is simulated in a molecular
transfer process. In molecular transfer, the molecules remain stationary but the energy is transferred
from one molecule to another. This mechanism is called molecular transfer. It is applicable to
phenomena of momentum, heat and mass transfer.
In Mode II, each man is moving with a bucket of water. It is similar to each molecule moving with the
energy, i.e. here the molecules and the energy move together. Such a mechanism is called convective
transfer. Here again, it is applicable to momentum, heat and mass transfer. Both the mechanisms of
Modes I and II will be discussed further in subsequent sections.
In Mode III, where water is sprayed from the pond to the fire place, a medium is required to transport
energy from one place to another. Such a mechanism is called radiation. It is one of the modes used
for heat transfer but not much important for momentum and mass transfer.
In summary, the mechanism of transport is accomplished by two means:
1. Molecular transfer
2. Convective transfer
We will now discuss the phenomenon of molecular momentum transfer and subsequently that of the
convective momentum transfer.
Let F be the force r equired to maintain the motion of the lower plate and y be the distance between
the plates. It has been experimentally found that the force F can be expressed as
F A
F v
F
Combining these factors, we get
or
. . . (1.2)
where n is a proportionality constant called the viscosity of the fluid. It is a fluid property.
Now, we write F/A = xyx, which is defined as the force per unit area required perpendicular to the ydirection. It is called shear stress. Further, we can designate v/y in the differential form as dvx/dy.
The negative sign indicates that velocity decreases in the positive direction of y. We can now write
Eq. (1.2) in symbol form as
. . . (1.3)
where
xyx = shear stress
and
= velocity gradient
Equation (1.3) states that the shear stress is proportional to the negative of the velocity gradient.
Since the constant of proportionality is called viscosity, this law is called Newtons law of
viscosity.
Newton suggested that those fluids which obey the law of viscosity be called Newtonian fluids. And
those fluids, especially polymers, etc. which do not obey this law be called non-Newtonian fluids.
Let us interpret the behaviour of this concept. At the neighbourhood of a solid surface (i.e. y = 0), the
fluid adjacent to the solid acquires x-momentum in the positive direction of y. So xyx is also called xmomentum in the positive direction of y.
SI units of viscosity n can be arrived at as follows. We have
xyx = [N/m2 = Pa]
vx = [m/s]
y = [m]
. . . (1.4)
where
= o = kinematic viscosity.
Let us summarize the molecular fluxes in Cartesian coordinates as shown in Table 1.1.
Table 1.1 Molecular Fluxes in Cartesian Coordinates
x-component
Flux
y-component
z-component
xxx
xyx
xxy
xyy
xxz
xyz
xzx
xzy
xzz
Direction of Velocity
x
t vz vx
t vz vy
t vz vz
4. Apply a momentum balance over the shell and to the area perpendicular to the variable velocity
selected.
5. Formulate the differential equation for the momentum flux by considering the shell thickness
approaching zero. Thus, we will get the first differential equation for the momentum flux as
6. Integrate the differential equation formed to get the momentum flux distribution.
7. There will be a constant of integration appearing now. There are two methods to evaluate it. Either
solve the constant here itself from physical concepts or carry it forward to solve it later.
8. Apply the Newtons law of viscosity and obtain a differential equation for the velocity distribution.
9. Integrate the differential equation to get the velocity distribution. It will appear with a constant of
integration.
10. Apply the boundary conditions to evaluate the constant values. Get the velocity distribution
equation.
11. From the velocity distribution, the other parameters such as average velocity, shear stress,
maximum velocity, etc. can be easily evaluated.
1.3.1 Boundary Conditions
In order to solve the differential equations formed for velocity and momentum flux, we have to use the
boundary conditions from physical concepts. The following concepts are commonly used in
momentum transport:
1. Solidliquid interface: If the solid surface over which the liquid flows is stationary, then at the
solidliquid interface, the liquid velocity will be zero. In other cases, the velocity of the liquid will
be equal to the velocity of the solid at the interface. This situation will be analysed later while
solving flow problems in viscometer.
2. Liquidliquid interface: In such cases, there is no slip between the two liquids at the interface.
The velocities of both the liquids will be the same at the interface. Also the momentum flux will be
the same for both the liquids at the interface.
3. Gasliquid interface: Since the viscosity of the gases is low compared to that of the liquids, so the
shear stress at the gasliquid interface will be zero.
SOLVED EXAMPLES
EXAMPLE 1.1 There are two parallel plates some distance apart. Between the plates, water is used
at 24C. The lower plate is being pulled at a constant velocity 0.4 m/s faster relative to the top plate.
How far apart should the two plates be placed so that the shear stress x is 0.3 N/m2? Also calculate
the shear rate.
Solution:
The relative velocity of two plates,
vx = 0.4 m/s
Viscosity of water at 24C,
n = 0.9142 cP
= 0.9142 103 kg/m s
Let y be the distance between the two plates.
Shear stress, xyx = 0.3 N/m2
Applying the Newtons law of viscosity,
or
or
or
= 0.00122 m
= 0.122 cm
Thus, shear rate,
EXAMPLE 1.2 The distance between two parallel plates is 0.00914 m and the lower plate is being
pulled at a constant velocity 0.366 m/s faster relative to the top plate. The fluid filled between the
plates is glycerol at 293 K having a viscosity 1.069 kg/m s. Calculate the shear stress and the shear
rate.
Solution:
The relative distance between the plates,
y = 0.00914 m
The relative velocity,
vx = 0.366 m/s
The viscosity of glycerol at 293 K = 1.069 kg/m s
Applying the Newtons law of viscosity,
or
shear rate =
PROBLEMS
1. Predict the viscosity of CO2 at 200 K and 1 atm. Given:
f/k = 190 K
v = 3.996
n = 1.548
where f and n are LeonnardJones parameters and K is temperature in kelvin.
2. Two square plates with each side 60 cm are spaced 12.5 mm apart. The lower plate is stationary
and the upper plate requires a force of 100 N to keep it moving with a velocity of 2.5 m/s. The oil
film between the plates has the same viscosity as that of the oil at the surface of contact. Assuming
a linear velocity distribution, determine the dynamic viscosity of oil in poise.
3. Determine the ratio of eddy viscosity to molecular viscosity at a distance 0.6R from the wall for
water flowing at a steady rate in a long smooth round tube under the following conditions:
Tube radius, R = 7 cm
Wall shear stress = 16.2 105 kPa
2
SHELL MOMENTUM BALANCEAND
VELOCITY DISTRIBUTIONIN LAMINAR
FLOW (TYPICAL CASES
In this chapter, we will learn how to make shell momentum balances for laminar flow conditions.
These are basically force balances over the shell considered. Next, we will apply the Newtons law
of viscosity to molecular momentum flux. Then, we will obtain the velocity profile. Later, the other
parameters like maximum velocity, average velocity, will be evaluated.
The examples in this chapter are considered idealized problems. The tools to solve these problems
should be understood thoroughly. Once the simple problems are understood, then the practical
problems can be solved.
An attempt has been made to solve the viscous flow problems first. Only the one-dimensional system
flow has been selected purposely to make the treatment easy.
In Section 2.1, the problem of liquid falling film has been solved. Section 2.2 deals with the flow
through a circular tube. Here, only the gravity flow is considered. Flow in a narrow slit is discussed
in Section 2.3. The flow in an annulus (Section 2.4) and the flow of two immiscible fluids (Section
2.5) give an idea of solving the problems with different boundary conditions. In all the cases, steadystate conditions are assumed. The unsteady-state flow equations are solved separately in Chapter 5.
Let us consider that a liquid is forming a film over the flat plate. Let the density t and the viscosity of
the fluid n be constant. The thickness of the film of the liquid is d and is very small compared to the
length and width of the plate.
The assumptions made in the analysis of flow of a liquid over a vertical flat plate are as follows:
1. No end effects. The disturbances of the flow of liquid at the edges (i.e. z = 0, z = L) are
neglected.
2. Liquid properties like density t, viscosity n, etc. remain constant.
3. Unidirectional flow, i.e. liquid flow is in the z-direction only, i.e. vx = 0, vy = 0.
4. Steady-state conditions.
5. Laminar flow of the liquid.
6. d L and d W.
7. The flow of liquid is under gravity only.
8. No convective momentum is considered.
9. The fluid is Newtonian.
Let us consider the liquid film of thickness d as shown in Figure 2.2. Consider that the flow of the
liquid is in the z-direction only, so the velocity vz is considered. The z-momentum considered will be
as follows:
Molecular momentum flux = xxz i.e. xzz = 0 and xyz = 0. Velocity = vz
Let us consider a shell of the liquid at a distance x and of thickness x. Applying a momentum balance
at the shell, we obtain:
Rate of molecular momentum in across the surface at x
Rate of molecular momentum out across the surfaceat at x + x
+ Gravity force acting on the fluid in the z-direction = 0 . . . (2.1)
. . . (2.7)
Integrating both sides of Eq. (2.7), we have
xxz = t gx + C1 . . . (2.8)
where C1 is a constant of integration.
Physically we know that at x = 0, the fluid velocity is maximum and at x = d, i.e. at the solid surface
of the plate, the fluid velocity is zero. Therefore, at the gasliquid interface, x = 0 and the shear stress
is zero.
Boundary condition 1: At x = 0, xxz = 0.
C1 = 0
Equation (2.8), therefore, becomes
xxz = t g x . . . (2.9)
Applying the Newtons law of viscosity to the left side of Eq. (2.9), we obtain
. . . (2.10)
where n is the viscosity of the liquid.
. . . (2.11)
This equation is the differential equation for the velocity distribution. Integrating it, we will get the
velocity,
. . . (2.12)
where C2 is a constant, which is evaluated by the boundary condition. We know that at the solid
surface of the flat plate, there is no slip between the liquid and the solid, i.e. since the plate is
stationary, hence the liquid is also stationary at the surface.
Boundary condition 2: At x = d, vz = 0 . . . (2.13)
Substituting this value in Eq. (2.12), we have
. . . (2.14)
Substituting the value of C2 in Eq. (2.12), we get velocity distribution as
. . . (2.15)
This is the parabolic velocity distribution solution. It is clear that this velocity distribution is a
parabola as shown in Figure 2.2. The shear stress is given by Eq. (2.9) and is a straight line as shown
in Figure 2.2.
From the velocity distribution, the other quantities can be easily calculated as follows:
(a) Maximum velocity
At x = 0, the velocity becomes maximum. Hence
. . . (2.16)
(b) Average velocity
vz,av
vz,av
Thus, vz,av =
(c) Mass flow rate
. . . (2.17)
. . . (2.18)
(d) Film thickness
From Eqs. (2.17) and (2.18), the film thickness can be calculated as
. . . (2.19)
where
= LWdtg . . . (2.20)
= weight of the entire liquid film
For falling film, the Reynolds number is defined as
. . . (2.21)
For laminar flow, NRe < 20.
For turbulent flow, NRe > 1500.
Steady-state conditions.
Laminar flow, i.e. NRe 1800.
Incompressible fluid, i.e. density t is constant and viscosity n is constant.
Unidirectional flow, i.e. liquid flow is only in the z-direction. Hence, v(i) = 0 and v(r) = 0.
Newtonian fluid.
No slip between the liquid and the solid surface of the wall.
No end effects. The disturbances of the flow of liquid at the edges (i.e. at z = 0, z = L) are
neglected.
8. The flow of liquid is under gravity only.
Under these assumptions, the z-momentum considered will be as follows:
Molecular momentum flux = xrz.
i.e. xiz = 0; xzz = 0
Let us consider a shell at a radius r and of thickness r as shown inFigure 2.3. Applying a momentum
balance at the cylindrical shell in the z-direction, we get
. . . (2.28)
where C1 is a constant of integration.
At r = 0, centre of the tube, the liquid velocity will be maximum and at the wall of the tube, the
velocity of liquid will be zero. So physically, the molecular momentum flux, xrz, will be finite at the
centre of the tube.
Boundary condition 1: At r = 0, xrz = finite . . . (2.29)
So, C1 must be zero, otherwise the momentum flux would become infinite at the centre of the tube.
Therefore, the momentum flux would become
. . . (2.30)
Applying the Newtons law of viscosity, we get
. . . (2.31)
Substituting Eq. (2.31) into Eq. (2.30), the differential equation for the velocity is given by
. . . (2.32)
Integrating this separable differential equation, we have
. . . (2.33)
The constant C2 can be evaluated from the boundary condition.
Boundary condition 2: At r = R, vz = 0
or
. . . (2.34)
. . . (2.35)
This velocity profile is for laminar, incompressible flow of a Newtonian fluid. The velocity profile is
parabolic as shown in Figure 2.4.
The shear stress xrz is also shown in Figure 2.4 which is linear.
Figure 2.4 Momentum flux distribution and velocity distribution in a circular tube.
. . . (2.36)
(b) Average velocity
vz,av
. . . (2.38)
or
. . . (2.39)
The flow must be checked before using these equations for the velocity profile, i.e. NRe 2100.
Let us consider the coordinates to be (x, z). Select a shell at a distance x and of thickness x as shown
in Figure 2.6. The velocity here is vz. The flow of the fluid is under pressure and gravity. Here,
vy = 0, vx = 0.
p0 is the pressure at z = 0.
pL is the pressure at z = L.
. . . (2.47)
where C1 is a constant of integration.
Physically we know that the velocity at the centre, i.e. x = 0, will be maximum. The velocity of the
fluid at both the plates will be zero, i.e.
at x = B or at x = B, vz = 0
Boundary condition 1: At x = 0, xxz = 0
C1 = 0
Equation (2.47) now becomes
. . . (2.48)
Applying the Newtons law of viscosity, we get
. . . (2.49)
. . . (2.50)
Integrating this equation by the variable separable method, we have
. . . (2.51)
Boundary condition 2: At x = B, vz = 0
. . . (2.52)
This is the velocity profile solution in a slit. It is clear that this velocity distribution is a parabola as
shown in Figure 2.6. The shear stress is given by Eq. (2.48) and is a straight line as shown in Figure
2.6.
From the velocity distribution, the other quantities can be easily calculated as follows:
(a) Maximum velocity
. . . (2.54)
Comparing Eqs. (2.53) and (2.54), we get
. . . (2.55)
A very important relation can be obtained from this analysis, i.e. slit analog of the HagenPoiseuille
equation is
The assumptions made in the analysis of flow of a liquid through an annulus are as follows:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Steady-state conditions.
Incompressible fluid.
Unidirectional flow, i.e. liquid is flowing in the z-direction only. Hence vi = 0, vr = 0.
Laminar flow of the fluid.
The fluid is Newtonian.
p0 is the pressure at z = 0.
pL is the pressure at z = L.
We make the following simplification:
( P = p + tg)
For the cylindrical coordinate, the momentum flux becomes xrz.
Let us consider a cylindrical shell of radius r and thickness r as shown in Figure 2.8.
Applying a momentum balance at the cylindrical shell, we obtain
Rate of molecular momentum in across the cylindrical surface at r
Rate of molecular momentum out across the cylindrical surface at r + r
+ External forces acting on the fluid = 0 . . . (2.56)
Rate of molecular momentum in across the cylindrical surface at r
= (2p rL) xrz | r . . . (2.57)
. . . (2.62)
where C1 is a constant. At this stage, C1 cannot be determined, since we have no knowledge about
the momentum flux xrz at the solid surfaces r = kR and r = R. But we know from the concept that
wherever the velocity is maximum, the shear stress will be zero at that plane. In the space between
the annulus, there will definitely be a plane where the velocity will be maximum. Let that plane
(unknown) be at r = mR at which the shear stress will be zero. Hence,
at r = mR, xrz = 0.
Now Eq. (2.62) becomes
. . . (2.63)
. . . (2.64)
Substituting the value of C1 in Eq. (2.62), we get
. . . (2.65)
Now applying the Newtons law of viscosity, we have
. . . (2.66)
Substituting the value of xrz in Eq. (2.65), we obtain a differential equation for vz as
. . . (2.67)
Integrating this first order differential equation by the separable method, we get
. . . (2.68)
where C2 is a constant.
In Eq. (2.68), there are two unknowns C2 and m. Hence, we need two boundary conditions to obtain
their values.
Boundary condition 1: At r = kR, vz = 0 . . . (2.69)
Boundary condition 2: At r = R, vz = 0 . . . (2.70)
0 = k2 2m2 ln k + C2 . . . (2.71)
and 0 = 1 + C2 . . . (2.72)
C2 = 1
Substituting the value of C2 in Eq. (2.71), we get
Substituting the values of C2 and 2m2 in Eq. (2.68), we get the velocity profile distribution as
. . . (2.73)
Substituting the value of m2 in Eq. (2.65), we obtain the momentum flux distribution as
. . . (2.74)
The velocity profile distribution and momentum flux distribution are shown in Figure 2.8.
The other quantities here, can easily be calculated as follows:
(a) Maximum velocity
. . . (2.75)
(b) Average velocity
vz,av
or vz,av
. . . (2.76)
. . . (2.77)
. . . (2.79)
For laminar flow, NRe 2100.
Figure 2.9 Two immiscible fluids flowing between two horizontal plates.
The assumptions made in the analysis of flow of two immiscible fluids flowing between two
horizontal plates are as follows:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Laminar flow
Incompressible liquids
Steady-state conditions
Only the pressure gradient occurs
Liquids are Newtonian
The coordinates (x, z) are selected in such a manner that the interface in Figure 2.9, becomes the zaxis. The distance between the plates is 2b. The shear stress considered will be:
Molecular momentum flux = xxz
Let us consider a shell at a distance x and of thickness x as shown inFigure 2.10. Applying a
momentum balance at the shell, we obtain
Rate of molecular momentum in across the surface at x
Rate of molecular momentum out at the surface at x + x
+ External pressure force acting on the fluid = 0 . . . (2.80)
Rate of molecular momentum in across the surface at x
= (W L)xxz | x . . . (2.81)
Rate of molecular momentum out across the surface at x + x
= (W L)xxz | x+x . . . (2.82)
External force acting on the fluid = (p0 pL)Wx . . . (2.83)
Figure 2.10 Velocity distribution and shear stress distribution for two immiscible fluids flowing between two horizontal plates.
Substituting the values of Eqs. (2.81), (2.82) and (2.83) in Eq. (2.80), we obtain
. . . (2.84)
Dividing Eq. (2.84) by WLx and taking the limit x 0, we get
. . . (2.85)
Integrating this equation for two phases I and II, we have
Fluid I:
. . . (2.86)
Fluid II:
. . . (2.87)
We know that at the interface (i.e. at x = 0), the momentum flux is continous. Let us now apply the
boundary conditions.
Boundary condition 1: At x = 0,
and the constants are
Now applying the Newtons law of viscosity for both the fluids, we have
. . . (2.88)
. . . (2.89)
Fluid I:
. . . (2.90)
Fluid II:
. . . (2.91)
Integrating Eqs. (2.90) and (2.91) by the variable separable method, we get
Fluid I:
. . . (2.92)
Fluid II:
. . . (2.93)
The three constants in Eqs. (2.92) and (2.93) can be determined from the boundary conditions.
Boundary condition 2: At x = 0,
. . . (2.94)
. . . (2.95)
Boundary condition 4: At x = b,
. . . (2.96)
. . . (2.97)
or
or
. . . (2.100)
or
or
. . . (2.101)
Substituting these values of C1 and C2 in Eq. (2.92) and (2.93), we get the velocity profile
distribution for fluid I and fluid II as follows:
Fluid I:
. . . (2.102)
Fluid II:
. . . (2.103)
Substituting the value of C1 in Eq. (2.86), we get the value of shear stress as follows:
. . . (2.104)
These velocity profiles and the shear stress profile are shown in Figure 2.10.
Now, let us calculate the plane of zero shear stress. Equating Eq. (2.104) to zero, we get the plane of
zero shear stress as
Once we know the velocity profiles of both the fluids, we can easily calculate the average velocity
and maximum velocity.
PROBLEMS
1. Show that the flow of a liquid along an inclined plate is
where
d = liquid film thickness
b = angle of inclination of the plate with the vertical axis
w = mass flow rate per unit width of the plate.
2. A Newtonian fluid is in laminar flow in a narrow slit formed by two parallel walls at a distance
2B apart. It is assumed that B << W so that the edge effects are unimportant. (a) Derive an
expression for the velocity distribution. (b) What is the ratio of the average velocity to the
maximum velocity?
[Ans. (a)
, (b)
3. An oil has a kimematic viscosity of 2 104 m2/s and density of0.8 103 kg/m3. What should be
the mass flow rate of the liquid for a falling film thickness of 2.5 mm on a vertical wall per metre
of vertical plate? [Ans. 0.2 kg/s]
3
EQUATIONS OF CHANGEFOR ISOTHERMAL
SYSTEM
In Chapter 2, we learnt about the velocity distribution in simple situations of common interest. We
applied a shell momentum balance and formed the differential equation for shear stress and applied
the Newtons law of viscosity to form a differential equation for the velocity profile. We then
integrated this equation, solved it with the help of boundary conditions and derived the velocity
profile. Once the velocity profile is known, other quantities like average velocity, maximum velocity,
etc. can easily be found out. To derive all these equations we used the mass and force balance
notation.
But it is not always possible to apply the mass balance to any problem or situation. We often
encounter complicated problems in chemical engineering. In such cases, the motions of fluid are
nonlinear and it is not always easy to solve these problems by shell momentum balances. Such
problems can easily be solved by two general equations:
1. Equation of continuity (mass balance)
2. Equation of motion (momentum balance)
These equations are derived in this chapter. These equations are used as the starting point for studying
any problem involving the isothermal flow of a pure liquid. Further, these general equations are
simplified for constant density and viscosity and are called NavierStokes equations which are more
famous for tackling engineering problems.
. . . (3.3)
. . . (3.4)
Similarly, we can write the expressions for the mass entering and leaving iny- and z-directions.
Hence the mass balance from Eq. (3.1) becomes
. . . (3.5)
Dividing both sides of Eq. (3.5) by xyz and taking the limit as x 0, y 0 and z 0, we obtain
. . . (3.6)
The rate of change in fluid density described by Eq. (3.6) is known as the equation of continuity. In
vector notation, we can write
. . . (3.7)
where is the divergence of mass velocity vector tv, and t changes with respect to space and time. We
can expand the term (tvx) and rearrange Eq. (3.6) as follows:
. . . (3.8)
or
. . . (3.9)
where D/Dt on the left-hand side of Eq. (3.9) is called the substantial derivative.
Case 1: For a compressible fluid (where t is constant), Eq. (3.7) becomes
(tv) = 0
Here, we consider the momentum transfer by two mechanisms, i.e. convective and molecular. Also,
the external forces acting on the system are pressure and gravity. First, we write the momentum
balance for the x-component of momentum and external forces. Similarly, we can write such
expressions for the y-component and z-component.
Convective momentum = (tv)v
Molecular momentum also called shear stress = x
Let us write the conservation-of-momentum equation:
(Rate of convective momentum in)
(Rate of convective momentum out)
+ (Rate of molecular momentum in)
(Rate of molecular momentum out)
The net convective x-momentum flow into the element xyz is given by
. . . (3.11)
Now let us write the molecular momentum terms:
Rate of x-component of momentum entering at x by molecular transfer
. . . (3.12)
Now, let us consider the external forces, pressure and gravity. Let p |x be the pressure exerted at the
face at x and p |x+x be the pressure exerted at x + x, in the x-direction.
Net fluid pressure acting in the x-direction
. . . (3.13)
Gravitational force acting in the x-direction
= tgxxyz . . . (3.14)
There is no meaning of writing the gravitational force by the symbol gx, but to make it more clear that
we are considering the x-direction forces, we write in this fashion. Here we assign the symbol gx to
the x-component of the gravitation vector g, as a matter of convenience.
Rate of accumulation of x-momentum
. . . (3.15)
Substituting Eqs. (3.11) to (3.15) in Eq. (3.10) and dividing by xyz and taking the limits x 0, y 0, and
z 0, we obtain the x-component of the differential equation of motion as follows:
. . . (3.16)
Similarly, the y-component and z-component of the differential equation of motion can be written as
follows:
y-component:
. . . (3.17)
z-component:
. . . (3.18)
Simplifying these equations by using the equation of continuity (3.6), i.e.
. . . (3.19)
y-component:
. . . (3.20)
z-component:
. . . (3.21)
The general form of the equation of motion for pure liquids can be written as
. . . (3.22)
where
D/Dt = substantial derivative
= divergence
. . . (3.23)
y-component:
. . . (3.24)
z-component:
. . . (3.25)
By combining these three components, we arrive at the general form of the equation as
. . . (3.26)
where
.
These equations are called NavierStokes equations and are most commonly used for solving
engineering problems.
SOLVED EXAMPLES
EXAMPLE 3.1 A fluid enters a flow system as shown in Figure 3.3.
The fluid enters a pipe of area A1 at a velocity v1 and density t1. The fluid leaves a pipe of area A2 at
a velocity v2 and density t2. Find an expresion for the velocity v2 of the fluid leaving the system.
Solution:
Applying the mass balance over the flow system, we have
Rate of mass entering Rate of mass leaving = Rate of mass accumulation
At the steady-state conditions, the rate of mass accumulation is zero.
Rate of mass entering = v1t1A1
Rate of mass leaving = v2t2A2
Applying the mass balance, we obtain
v1t1A1 = v2t2A2
or
EXAMPLE 3.2 A fluid enters a nozzle 1 of 40 cm diameter at a velocity 3 m/s. Then the fluid splits
into two nozzles 2 and 3 connected in a Y shape. The diameter of nozzle 2 is 30 cm and the flow rate
is 2 m/s. The diameter of the nozzle 3 is 20 cm. Find the velocity in the nozzle 3.
Solution:
Let us consider the nozzles configuration as shown in Figure 3.4.
or v3 = 7.5 m/s
PROBLEMS
1. A 20% (wt) sucrose solution having a density of 1074 kg/m3 flows through a system as shown in
Figure 3.3. The fluid enters a pipe of diameter 52.5 mm at a flow rate of 1.892 m3/h.
(a) Calculate the velocity at which the fluid will leave the system in a pipe of diameter of 40.9
mm.
(b) Also calculate the mass velocity of the fluid.
[Ans. (a) 0.4 m/s, (b) 2032 kg/h]
2. An oil of density 892 kg/m3 flows through a pipe of diameter 52.5 mm as shown in Figure 3.3. The
total flow rate is 1.388 103 m3/s entering the pipe. If the diameter of the pipe in which the oil
leaves the system is 77.9 mm, then at what velocity will the oil leave the system?
[Ans. 0.0321 m/s]
4
MOMENTUM TRANSFERIN TURBULENT
FLOW
Laminar flow or streamline flow is easier to understand. In laminar flow, the fluid moves in a
particular fashion. Molecules of the fluid behave orderly and move in straight lines and stream-wise.
The mathematical formulation of the differential equations is easy and straightforward. In Chapter 2,
we discussed typical cases by shell momentum balance for laminar flow conditions. Then we solved
the equations formed with the help of boundary conditions. Since the mechanism is easy, mathematical
formulation becomes an easier way to understand the laminar flow phenomenon. But as the number of
variables becomes large, the mathematics becomes difficult. Nowadays with the help of the computer,
the numerical methods of solving such problems are available.
On the other hand, the situation for turbulent flow is different. The molecules move randomly with
different velocities in all directions. The mechanism is difficult to understand. Eddy formation takes
place. Boundary-layer formation and boundary-layer separation also take place. The velocities of the
fluid changes in direction and magnitude when the fluid faces some solid obstruction. The
mathematics becomes more complex and solutions are not feasible. Scientists have taken different
approaches to understand the fluid behaviour under turbulent flow conditions. These methods are
empirical, experimental or models.
An attempt has been made to understand the flow behaviour under turbulent flow by timesmoothed
velocities, boundary-layer thickness near the solid surface and Prandtl mixing length models.
In order to understand the process, let us first consider these fluctuations in the x-direction. We can
measure the instantaneous velocity at a given point w.r.t. time with the help of a Pitot tube. These
plots of variations of the instantaneous velocity vx in the x-direction are shown in Figure 4.1.
+ vx . . . (4.1)
However, the squares of these fluctuation velocities are not zero, i.e.
(vx)2 0, (vy)2 0, (vz) 0
but have positive values.
Since the fluctuations are random, the data have been analysed by statistical techniques. The timeaveraged fluctuations of velocity vanish over a short period of time. The level of intensity of the
turbulence may be related to the square root of the mean squares of the fluctuating velocity
components.
The intensity of the turbulence, I, can be defined mathematically as in Eq. (4.3).
. . . (4.3)
The intensity of the tubulence, I, is an important parameter and is helpful in understanding heat and
mass transfer processes under turbulent conditions. Experimentally, this parameter I can be measured
by a hot-wire anemometer.
4.1.1 Time-Smoothed Equation of Change for Incompressible Fluids for Turbulent Flow
After defining the time-smoothed velocities and some of the properties of these fluctuations, we can
now discuss the equation of motion and the continuity equation. For simplicity, let us consider only
the case of incompressible fluids with constant density and viscosity. Similar equations hold good for
pressure as well. That is,
. . . (4.4)
Let us reproduce here the equation of continuity and the equation of motion, i.e. Eq. (3.6) and Eq.
(3.23).
Equation of continuity with constant density:
. . . (3.6)
Equation of motion: x-component:
. . . (3.23)
Substituting,
in the equation of continuity and the equation of motion, we get the equation of continuity as
. . . (4.5)
and the x-component of equation of motion as
. . . (4.6)
Now applying the simplification procedure
noting that the time-averaged product
. . . (4.7)
. . . (4.8)
Similar relations can be obtained for the y-component and the z-component. These equations are timesmoothed equation of continuity and equation of motion for constant density and viscosity. Comparing
these equations with Eqs. (3.6) and (3.23), we observe:
(a) The equation of continuity (4.7) is the same as the previous one except that vx is replaced by
(time-smoothed average velocity). Similar is the case for vy and vz.
(b) The equation of motion (4.8) also has the same changes in terms of time-smoothed velocity and
pressure. The only change is that a third expression on the right-hand side is added. The three
terms of this expression are described by the momentum transport associated with the turbulent
fluctuations. Let these components be defined as:
. . . (4.9)
These components are generally known as Reynolds stresses.
where the velocity reaches 99% of the main stream velocity. OL is the boundary-layer thickness line
as shown in Figure 4.2. Some simplifications of the NavierStokes equations are done to the concept
of a thin boundary layer:
can be simplified.
x-component:
. . . (4.10)
y-component:
. . . (4.11)
The continuity equation may be used to simplify the above equations, which is
. . . (4.12)
In Eq. (4.10), the term 2vx/x2 is negligible compared to the other terms in the equation. The terms
containing vy and its derivative are small. Hence,Eq. (4.10) becomes
. . . (4.13)
Further simplification can be done. Since the velocity at the entrance v is constant, dp/dx is zero,
hence Eq. (4.13) becomes
. . . (4.14)
Equation (4.14) and the equation of continuity (4.12) are solved with the following boundary
conditions.
Boundary condition 1:
vx = 0 at y = 0
vy = 0 at y = 0
Boundary condition 2: At some distance away from the flat plate.
vx = v at y
Equations (4.12) and (4.14) are nonlinear equations and hence the solutions become complex. Blasius
reduced these two equations to a single ordinary differential equation which is nonlinear and obtained
a series solution.
The results of Blasius are outlined below. The boundary-layer thickness d, where vx 0.99v , is given
approximately by
. . . (4.15)
where NRe,x =
It is clear that the boundary-layer thickness d is proportional to
Before proceeding further, one should be clear that for calculating the drag force for flow over a flat
plate, only the skin friction plays an important role. Let us calculate the shear stress at the surface at y
= 0 for any value of x.
. . . (4.16)
From the relation of vx as a function of x and y obtained from the series solution, Eq. (4.16) becomes
. . . (4.17)
Let L be the length of the plate and b be the width. The total drag force can be calculated as
. . . (4.18)
Substituting Eq. (4.17) in Eq. (4.18) and integrating, we get
. . . (4.19)
The drag coefficient is defined from the drag force as
. . . (4.20)
But A = b L
. . . (4.21)
Substituting the value of FD from Eq. (4.19) in Eq. (4.21), we obtain
. . . (4.22)
. . . (4.23)
or
where
The Fanning friction factor f for laminar flow in circular pipes, we know, is given by
. . . (4.24)
where
Now, let us compare Eq. (4.23) with Eq. (4.24). These are similar equations for different situations.
The only constraint is that CD applies to the laminar boundary layer only for NRe, L < 5 105. Also,
Eq. (4.23) has been experimentally verified.
Dividing both sides of Eq. (4.28) by L and taking the limit L 0, we get
. . . (4.29)
agree with
5
UNSTEADY-STATE FLOWOF
NEWTONIAN FLUIDS
In Chapter 2, we solved many cases of streamline flow. Those problems can easily be solved by
applying shell momentum balances. It is easy to formulate such simple problems and their solutions
are also simple. Chapter 3 deals with the general equations of motion. We can start the problems from
such general equations, and simplifications are done based upon some assumptions. Here also the
mathematical solutions are easy.
But in actual situations, one encounters unsteady-state problems. The partial differential equations
formed involve analytical methods to solve these problems. The unsteady-state behaviour creates
more than one direction. Such problems are extensively solved in fluid dynamics. These mathematical
equations formed are solved by analytical and numerical methods. With the help of computers, these
complicated practical problems can be solved by numerical methods.
In this chapter, a very simple case is taken up for unsteady state.
Flow is laminar
No gravity force
No pressure gradient
Incompressible fluid
Figure 5.1 Laminar flow of a liquid near a flat plate suddenly set in motion.
or
. . . (5.2)
where n = n/t.
In order to solve Eq. (5.2), we need the initial and boundary conditions.
Initial condition:
At t 0, vx = 0 for all y (5.3)
Boundary condition 1:
At y = 0, vx = v0 for all t > 0 (5.4)
Boundary condition 2:
At y = , vx = 0 for all t > 0 (5.5)
Equation (5.2) can be solved with the help of the above initial and boundary conditions by numerical
methods. Let us introduce the following dimensionless velocity and time parameters to solve this
equation:
= 1 erf(h)
= erfc(h) . . . (5.9)
where the error function can be defined as
1 erf(x) = erfc(x)
where erfc(x) is called the complementary error function.
Now the original variable becomes
. . . (5.10)
The complementary error function is a decreasing function which varies from 1 to 0.
One can plot the dimensionless velocity vs. dimensionless time as shown in Figure 5.2.
Figure 5.2 Velocity distribution (dimensionless velocity vs. dimensionless time) for a flow near the wall when the wall is suddenly set in
motion.
In this chapter, we have explained a simple situation of unsteady-state flow near a wall solving it
analytically. However, in practice, numerical methods too, are extensively used to solve such
problems with the help of computers.
Section B
HEAT TRANSFER
6
HEAT TRANSFER
Some solid materials conduct heat easily, whereas others do not. Metals conduct heat, whereas wood
does not conduct heat. Wood insulates heat. Heat conduction in fluids is slightly different than that in
solids. In fluids (such as liquids and gases), energy is being transferred by two mechanisms:
1. Molecular energy transfer
2. Convective energy transfer
These two modes of energy transfer have been explained well in Chapter 1 with the help of an
example. In heat transfer, there is a third mechanism, namely radiation. In radiation, energy is interdiffusing and does not require any media. Radiation energy mechanism is different and will not be
discussed in this book.
The physical property that describes the rate at which heat is conducted is called the thermal
conductivity k. Now, we shall define and explain the thermal conductivity by Fouriers law of heat
conduction.
As time passes, the temperature of the slab changes. After a small period of time, the temperature
profile is shown in Figure 6.1. At steady-state conditions, the temperature profile becomes linear. Let
or
. . . (6.1)
where k is a constant called thermal conductivity, a thermal property of the solid. Equation (6.1) is
also valid if we replace the solid slab by a fluid (liquid or gas). The only precaution to be taken is
that there is no convection or radiation of heat taking place.
Let us write Eq. (6.1) in the usual differential form when the thickness of the slab approaches zero.
The rate of heat flow per unit area is written as qy which is called heat flux in the positive direction
of y. Equation (6.1) now becomes
. . . (6.2)
This equation is called Fouriers law of heat conduction in one dimension. In other words, we can
say that the heat flux by conduction is proportional to the temperature gradient. The negative sign
indicates that heat flow decreases in the positive direction of y.
Similarly, we can write Eq. (6.2) in x- and z-directions as well.
. . . (6.3)
. . . (6.4)
In the vector notation, all these equations can be combined and we can write
. . . (6.5)
There is another way of defining thermal conductivity, known as thermal diffusivity a. It is defined as
. . . (6.6)
where
cp = specific heat capacity at constant pressure, J/kg K
a = thermal diffusivity.
Units are:
k = W/m K
a = m2/s
qy = W/m2
Here, a, the thermal diffusivity, is similar to the momentum diffusivity as discussed in Chapter 1.
Momentum and thermal diffusvity are correlated by a dimensionless number called Prendtl number. It
is dfined as
. . . (6.7)
The thermal conductivity has to be measured expeimentally because it depends upon so many
parameter. In solids, the thermal conductivity and electrical conductivity are closely related. It is
discussed in detail by Jacob1.
Figure 6.2 Energy transfr by convective mode with velocity vx across the surfae d perpendicular to the x-axis.
. . . (6.12)
SOLVED EXAMPLES
EXAMPLE 6.1 The thermal conductivity of an insulating material was measured. The temperature of
a flat slab of 25 mm of the material was measured to be 318.4 K and 303.2 K. The heat flux was
measured to be 35.1 W/m2. Calculate the thermal conductivity of the material.
Solution:
EXAMPLE 6.2 Calculate the heat loss per m2 of surface area for an insulating wall of a cold storage
room where the outside temperature is 299.9 K and the inside room temperature is 276.5 K. The wall
is made of 25.4 mm of corkboard having thermal conductivity k of 0.0433 W/m K.
Solution:
Applying Fouriers law of heat conduction,
where
k = 0.0433 W/m K
T = 299.9 276.5 = 23.4 K
x = 25.4 mm = 0.0254 m
Heat loss per m2 = 0.0433
= 39.9 W/m2
PROBLEMS
1. A plastic panel of area 0.5 m2 and thickness 0.1 m was found to conduct heat at a rate of 3 W at
steady state with temperature T0 = 24C and T1 = 26C on the two main surfaces. What is its
thermal conductivity? . . . [Ans. 0.3 W/m K]
2. Calculate the heat loss per m2 of the surface area of an insulating wall composed of 25.4 mm
thick fibre insulating board, where the inside temperature is 352.7 K and the outside
temperature is 297.1 K. The thermal conductivity of the board k is 0.048 W/m K. . . . [Ans.
105.1 W/m2]
7
SHELL ENERGY BALANCESAND
TEMPERATURE DISTRIBUTION IN HEAT
CONDUCTION IN SOLIDS (Typical Cases)
In Chapter 2, we applied momentum balance over a shell and solved for momentum flux. In this way,
we obtained the differential equation for the momentum flux. Then the Newtons law of viscosity was
applied. Thus, the differential equation was obtained. After integration, the constants evolved were
evaluated from the boundary conditions. As discussed earlier in Chapter 2, these differential
equations for momentum flux and velocity were obtained after evaluating the constants of integration
from physical concepts.
Similarly, in this chapter too, we select the shell over which heat balance is applied. The differential
equation for heat flux is obtained. One thing should be kept in mind that the area should be taken
perpendicular to the flow of heat flux. Afterwards, the Fouriers law of heat conduction is applied.
After integration of the differential equation, we obtain the temperature distribution profile. But the
constants of integrations are evaluated from the boundary conditions.
In both these chapters, the wordings used are similar and the methods to solve momentum and heat
problems are also similar. But one should be very careful while solving energy problems.
We start with a very simple heat conduction problem in Section 7.1 with an electrical heat source.
Here, we consider heat conduction in one dimension only to understand the solution very clearly.
Heat conduction in a nuclear heat source is discussed in Section 7.2 to understand the continuity of
heat flux and temperature at the interfaces.
In Sections 7.3 and 7.4, heat conduction through composite walls and cooling fins are dealt with.
These problems are of practical nature. Heat conduction from a spherical ball to a stagnant fluid is
solved in Section 7.5. Sections 7.6 and 7.7 illustrate the heat conduction problems with a viscous heat
source and chemical reactions. In these problems, we learn how to apply the boundary conditions. In
all these problems, steady-state conditions are assumed.
The heat produced per unit volume by the electrical wire is given by
(7.1)
where
Se = energy produced per unit volume, A-/cm3
I = current density, A/cm2
ke = electrical conductivity, 1 cm1
The following assumptions are made in the analysis of heat conduction with an electrical source:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
we get
. . . (7.13)
where C2 is the constant of integration, which can be solved by using the boundary condition.
Boundary condition 2:
At r = R, T = T0 (surface temperature).
C2 = T0 +
. . . (7.14)
. . . (7.15)
The temperature distribution given by Eq. (7.15) is parabolic as shown in Figure 7.1(b).
Other temperatures can now easily be calculated from this temperature distribution as follows:
(a) Maximum temperature at r = 0
(Tmax T0) =
. . . (7.16)
. . . (7.17)
Comparing Eq. (7.16) with Eq. (7.17), we get
Tav =
Tmax . . . (7.18)
Let us consider that heat is being conducted away only by conduction. There is no convection energy.
Let us also consider a shell element of radius r and thickness r through which the heat flux qrF is
passing in the fissionable material. Applying the heat balance at the shell at the steady-state condition,
we get
Rate of heat in at r Rate of heat out at r + r
+ Rate of heat produced by the nuclear fission = 0 . . . (7.22)
Rate of heat in at r by conduction = (4rr2)qrF |r . . . (7.23)
Rate of heat out at r + r by conduction = (4rr2qrF) |r+r . . . (7.24)
Rate of heat produced by the nuclear fission = Sn(4rr2r) . . . (7.25)
Substituting the values of Eqs. (7.23), (7.24) and (7.25) in Eq. (7.22), we obtain
(4rr2qrF)|r (4rr2qrF)|r+r + Sn(4rr2r) = 0 . . . (7.26)
Dividing both sides of Eq. (7.26) by 4rr and taking the limit as r 0, we have
. . . (7.27)
Substituting the value of Sn from Eq. (7.21) in Eq. (7.27), we get
. . . (7.28)
Similarly, the heat flux qrC in the aluminium cladding can be evaluated by heat conduction balance
but there is no heat source term here. Hence
. . . (7.29)
Integrating Eqs. (7.28) and (7.29), we get
. . . (7.30)
and
. . . (7.31)
where C1 and C2 are the constants. These are calculated by boundary conditions. We know that at the
interface of the fissionable material and cladding, the heat flux is the same.
Boundary condition 1:
At r = 0, qrF = finite . . . (7.32)
Boundary condition 2:
At r = R1, qrF = qrC . . . (7.33)
By boundary condition 1, C1 = 0. Hence
. . . (7.34)
By boundary condition 2, putting r = R1, we have
. . . (7.35)
and qrC becomes
. . . (7.36)
By equating Eqs. (7.35) and (7.36), we get
. . . (7.37)
Substituting this value of C2 in Eq. (7.31), we obtain
. . . (7.38)
Now applying the Fouriers law of heat conduction for both these materials of different thermal
conductivity, we have
. . . (7.39)
and
. . . (7.40)
Substituting these values of qrF and qrC in Eqs. (7.34) and (7.38) and integrating, we get
. . . (7.41)
. . . (7.42)
where C3 and C4 are constants of integration, which can be evaluated by boundary conditions.
Boundary condition 3:
At r = R1, TF = TC (temperature at the interface) . . . (7.43)
Boundary condition 4:
At r = R2, TC = T0 (ambient temperature) . . . (7.44)
By boundary condition 4, C4 can be evaluated as
. . . (7.45)
Substituting the value of C4 in Eq. (7.44), we obtain
. . . (7.46)
. . . (7.48)
Substituting the value of C4 from Eq. (7.45) in Eq. (7.48), we get
. . . (7.49)
or
. . . (7.50)
At the interface TC = TF, we get
or
. . . (7.51)
. . . (7.52)
In Figure 7.3, the three slabs are of different thicknesses and of different materials of thermal
conductivities, k1, k2, k3. The surface of the first slab comes in contact with fluid A which is at a
temperature Ta. The third slab comes in contact with fluid B which is at a temperature Tb. The
temperature Ta is higher than the temperature Tb and thus the heat will flow from fluid A towards
fluid B passing through these three slabs. The slab surfaces are at places x0, x1, x2 and x3. The
thicknesses of these slabs are (x1 x0), (x2 x1) and (x3 x2). We are interested in finding the
temperature profiles in the slabs and also the heat flux.
The following assumptions are made in the analysis of heat conduction through composite walls:
1.
2.
3.
4.
With the above assumptions, let qx be the heat flux flowing in the x-direction. Let us consider a shell
at x and of thickness x for applying heat balance in the region 1. There is no heat generation.
Rate of heat in at the surface x
Rate of heat out at the surface x + x = 0 . . . (7.53)
Region 1:
qx |x WH qx |x+x WH = 0 . . . (7.54)
Dividing both sides of Eq. (7.54) by WH x and taking the limit x 0, we have
. . . (7.55)
or
. . . (7.56)
. . . (7.59)
Region 2:
. . . (7.60)
Region 3:
. . . (7.61)
where k1, k2 and k3 are the respective thermal conductivities of these three slabs and are constant.
Integrating these equations over the thickness of each slab,
we get for:
Region 1:
. . . (7.62)
Region 2:
. . . (7.63)
Region 3:
. . . (7.64)
Applying the Newtons law of cooling at the surfaces x = x0 and x = x3, we will get:
At surface x = x0:
q0 = h0(Ta T0)
or
. . . (7.65)
At surface x = x3:
. . . (7.66)
where h0 and h3 are the heat transfer coefficients of the fluids A and B, respectively. Adding these
five Eqs. (7.62) to (7.66), we get
. . . (7.67)
. . . (7.68)
Equation (7.68) can be written either in heat flux (J/m2 s) form or in heat flow Q(J/s) form.
Let us now define the overall heat transfer coefficient U as
q0 = U(Ta Tb) . . . (7.69)
or Q = U(W H)(Ta Tb) . . . (7.70)
Comparing Eqs. (7.69) and (7.70), we get
. . . (7.71)
We can now generalize Eq. (7.71) for n number of slabs as
. . . (7.72)
This equation is very useful for calculating heat transfer through composite walls separating two fluid
streams. If we know the heat transfer coefficients, then the thickness of the slabs can be found out. It is
a very useful relation for designing furnaces.
The rectangular fin is attached to a hot wall at a temperature Tw which is known. We make certain
assumptions and consider Cartesian coordinates.
Assumptions:
1. Steady-state conditions prevail.
2. B << L and B << W, i.e. the thickness of the fin is very small in comparison to its length and
width.
3. Heat flows only in the z-direction, i.e. qx and qy are zero.
4. Temperature is a function of the z-direction.
5. Heat is lost by conduction in the fin.
6. No heat is lost by the edges of the fin.
7. Heat flux at the surface of the fin is given by the Newtons law of cooling, i.e.
qz = h(T Ta) . . . (7.73)
where
h = heat transfer coefficient (constant)
Ta = ambient air temperature at the surface of the fin.
8. Thermal conductivity k is constant.
With the above assumptions, we select the shell as shown in Figure 7.4. Here, the heat flux will be qz
only. Now applying, the heat balance at the shell, we have
Rate of heat in by conduction at z
Rate of heat out by conduction at z + z
Heat lost at the surface of the fin = 0 . . . (7.74)
i.e.
. . . (7.75)
Dividing both sides of Eq. (7.75) by 2BWz and taking the limit z 0, we get
. . . (7.76)
Now we apply the Fouriers law of heat conduction and get
. . . (7.77)
where k is the thermal conductivity of the material of fin which is assumed constant.
We now get by substituting Eq. (7.77) in Eq. (7.76),
. . . (7.78)
This differential equation can be solved with the help of boundary conditions.
Boundary condition 1:
At z = 0, T = Tw (wall temperature) . . . (7.79)
Boundary condition 2:
At z = L,
In order to solve the above differential equations, we introduce the following dimensionless
quantities:
, dimensionless temperature . . . (7.81)
, dimensionless distance . . . (7.82)
, dimensionless heat transfer coefficient* . . . (7.83)
**
With the introduction of the above dimensionless quantities, Eq. (7.78) and the boundary conditions
become:
. . . (7.84)
Boundary condition 1:
i |Z=0 = 1 . . . (7.85)
Boundary condition 2:
. . . (7.86)
The solution of the differential Eq. (7.84) is well known in mathematics.
or (D2 N2)i = 0
. . . (7.87)
. . . (7.93)
Substituting the values of C1 and C2 in Eq. (7.88) and simplifying, we obtain
i = cosh NZ tanh N sinh NZ . . . (7.94)
. . . (7.95)
Substituting in Eq. (7.95) the values of i and Z from Eq. (7.81) and Eq. (7.82) we get
. . . (7.96)
The effectiveness of the fin can now be calculated as
. . . (7.97)
or
. . . (7.98)
(7.99)
or
. . . (7.100)
. . . (7.101)
Let us consider that the heated sphere is suspended in a pool of fluid as shown in Figure 7.5. Let us
also consider a shell of radius r and thickness r. The surface temperature of the sphere is TR and the
temperature of the fluid far away from the sphere is TC. With the above assumptions, let us apply the
heat balance to the shell.
Heat flux = qr
Rate of heat in at the spherical surface at r Rate of heat out at the spherical surface at r + r
= 0 . . . (7.102)
i.e. (4rr2qr)|r (4rr2qr)|r+r = 0 . . . (7.103)
Dividing both sides of Eq. (7.103) by 4rr and taking the limit r 0, we have
. . . (7.104)
Integrating Eq. (7.104), we get
r2qr = C1 . . . (7.105)
where C1 is the integration constant.
Now applying the Fouriers law of heat conduction, i.e.
. . . (7.106)
we get
. . . (7.107)
. . . (7.111)
and TC = C2 . . . (7.112)
Substituting the value of C2 in Eq. (7.111), we get
C1 = (TR TC)kR . . . (7.113)
Substituting the values of C1 and C2 in Eq. (7.108), we obtain
. . . (7.114)
Now let us calculate the heat flux at the surface of the sphere. Once the temperature profile is known,
the heat flux at the surface of the sphere can be calculated.
. . . (7.115)
By differentiating Eq. (7.114) and substituting r = R, we get
. . . (7.116)
. . . (7.117)
We can write the Newtons law of cooling at the surface of the sphere as
qr |r = R = h(TR TC) . . . (7.118)
where h is the heat transfer coefficient.
Equating Eqs. (7.117) and (7.118), we get
. . . (7.119)
or
. . . (7.120)
With the above assumptions, we apply the heat balance at the shell. Here, we use the concept of
combined flux e.
WLex |x WLex |x+x = 0 . . . (7.123)
Dividing both sides of Eq. (7.123) by WLx and taking the limit x 0, we get
. . . (7.124)
Integrating Eq. (7.124), we have
ex = C1 . . . (7.125)
The combined flux e has three components, i.e.
1. Convective energy flux
2. Rate of work done by molecular transfer mechanism
or
. . . (7.132)
At x = 0,T = T0 . . . (7.135)
Boundary condition 2:
At x = b, T = Tb . . . (7.136)
Here we assume T0 Tb.
By boundary condition 1,
C2 = T0 . . . (7.137)
Applying boundary condition 2,
. . . (7.138)
Substituting the values of C1 and C2 in Eq. (7.134), we have
. . . (7.139)
On simplification, we get
or
or
. . . (7.140)
vz = vb
Rate at which the work is done by molecular momentum
. . . (7.142)
The reactants enter the reactor with a uniform velocity. The reactor is divided into three zones:
Zone I: Entrance zone, z = to z = 0.
Zone II: Reaction zone, z = 0 to z = L.
Zone III: Exit zone, z = L to z = + .
Zone I is packed with inert spherical particles which are non-catalytic. Zone II is packed with
catalyst particles where the reaction takes place. Zone III is packed with inert spherical particles
which are again non-catalytic. The reactor is insulated.
Here, the heat of reaction depends upon the operating conditions of the reactor such as pressure,
temperature, composition of the reactants and catalyst. The chemical energy is converted into heat
energy. Let Sc be the chemical energy per unit volume. It is a very complicated parameter to be
evaluated. Let us formulate the simple form in which the chemical energy is a function of temperature
only.
Sc = SC1 F(i) . . . (7.144)
where SC1 is a constant and i, the dimensionless temperature, is given by
. . . (7.145)
where T1 is the reactant temperature at which it enters.
The following assumptions are made in the analysis of heat conduction with a chemical reaction heat
source:
1. The fluid enters with uniform axial velocity in the plug flow reactor.
2. The reactor wall is insulated, i.e. the temperature is independent of the r-direction but is a
function of the z-direction only.
3. Steady-state conditions prevail.
4. Density, superficial velocity and mass flow rate of the fluid are independent of r- and z-
directions.
The superficial velocity v0 is based upon the empty reactor, i.e.
. . . (7.146)
where
w = mass flow rate, kg/s
t = density of fluid, kg/m3.
Let us consider a disk of radius R at a distance of z and of thickness z. Using the concept of combined
flux e, we can now apply heat balance in Zone II.
rR2ez |z rR2ez |z+z + (rR2z)Sc = 0 . . . (7.147)
Dividing both sides of Eq. (7.147) by rR2z and taking the limit z 0, we get
. . . (7.148)
This combined flux e has three components:
1. Convective energy flux.
2. Rate of work done by molecular momentum transfer.
3. Rate of heat flux due to conduction.
. . . (7.149)
The first term can be re-written by neglecting the pressure term which is constant in the z-direction:
i.e.
. . . (7.150)
and [x v] = 0 . . . (7.153)
The third term is of the z-component and applying the Fouriers law of heat conduction, we obtain
. . . (7.154)
Here, we consider thermal conductivity keff (effective), since the heat is being transferred from the
catalyst particle to the other particles, liquid to liquid, liquid to solid catalyst particle, so we assume
the thermal conductivity in all the three zones to be constant.
Substituting these various values in Eq. (7.148), we get
. . . (7.155)
or
. . . (7.156)
At z = 0,
Boundary condition 4:
At z = L, TII = TIII . . . (7.164)
Boundary condition 5:
At z = L,
. . . (7.165)
Boundary condition 6:
At z = , TIII = finite . . . (7.166)
The equations for all the three zones can be solved with the help of these boundary conditions. But let
us take a practical case of interest to engineers of limiting solution. In this case, the convective heat
transfer is more significant than the conductive heat transfer. So the conductive heat transfer terms can
be neglected.
Let us introduce the dimensionless terms:
. . . (7.167)
. . . (7.168)
. . . (7.169)
where N is the dimensionless thermal heat source.
. . . (7.170)
where
is a constant.
With the introduction of the above dimensionless terms, we can transfer the differential Eqs. (7.158)
to (7.160), and neglecting the conductive heat transfer terms, we get
Zone I: z < 0,
. . . (7.171)
Zone II: 0 < z < 1,
. . . (7.172)
Zone III: z > L,
. . . (7.173)
The above equations are the first-order differential equations which are solved with the separable
variable methods.
The boundary conditions become:
Boundary condition 1:
At Z = , iI = 1 . . . (7.174)
Boundary condition 2:
At Z = 0, iI = iII . . . (7.175)
Boundary condition 3:
At Z = 1, iII = iIII . . . (7.176)
With these boundary conditions, a limiting solution for the case will be discussed:
Let
F(i) = i . . . (7.177)
The solutions are:
Zone I: z < 0,
iI = 1 . . . (7.178)
Zone II: 0 < z < 1,
iII = eNZ . . . (7.179)
Zone III: z > L,
iIII = eN . . . (7.180)
Now, let us plot these dimensionless temperature vs. dimensionless distance as shown in Figure 7.8.
SOLVED EXAMPLES
EXAMPLE 7.1 A cold storage room is constructed of an inner layer of 12.7 mm of pinewood, a
middle layer of 101.6 mm of cork board and an outer layer of 76.2 mm of concrete. The wall surface
temperature is 255.4 K inside the cold room and 297.1 K at the outside surface of the concrete. The
thermal conductivities are given below. Calculate the heat loss in watts for 1 m2 and the temperature
at the interface between the pinewood and cork board.
Data: The thermal conductives of the materials used are as follows:
S.No.
Material
1.
2.
3.
Pinewood
Cork board
Concrete
0.151
0.0433
0.762
Solution:
Let us consider the cold storage room to be made up of three materials A, B and C as pinewood, cork
board and concrete, respectively.
The cold storage room temperature, T1 = 255.4 K. The outside temperature, T4 = 297.1 K. Area = 1
m2.
Pinewood, A = thermal conductivity, kA = 0.151 W/m K
Cork board, B = thermal conductivity, kB = 0.0433 W/m K
Concrete, C = thermal conductivity, kC = 0.762 W/m K
Thickness:
xA = 0.0127 m
xB = 0.1016 m
xC = 0.0762 m
Let us calculate the resistances:
The heat flows from outside to inside the cold storage room.
Let T2 be the temperature at the interface between the pinewood and the cork board. Applying the
heat balance, we have
T2 = 256.8 K
EXAMPLE 7.2 A layer of pulverized cork of 6 in. thick is used as a layer of thermal insulation in a
flat wall. The temperature on the cold side of the cork is 40F and that on the warm side is 180F.
The area of the wall is 25 ft2. The thermal conductivity of the cork is 0.021 Btu/ft h F at 32F and is
0.032 at 200F. What is the rate of heat flow through the wall in Btu/h?
Solution: The thermal conductivity k1 of the pulverised cork at 32F = 0.021 Btu/ft h F at 32F. At
200F, the thermal conductivity k2 of the pulverised cork = 0.032 Btu/FthF.
Solution:
We consider the case when the end of the fin is insulated.
Let the width of the fin be 1 cm. Here,
Tw = 300C
Ta = 50C
or m = 3.8
Substituting the values in Eq. (i), we get
Q = 300 2(0.01 0.003) 3.8(300 50) tanh (3.8 0.075)
Q = 4.746 W
or
PROBLEMS
1. Consider a heat conduction with electrical heat source from an electrical wire of radius R and
length L. At the wall, T0 is unknown but the heat flux at the wall is given by the Newtons law
of cooling, i.e. at r = R
qr |r=R = h(T Tair)
where h is the heat transfer coefficient and Tair is the ambient temperature.
Develop the temperature profile for the above system. Assume the heat transfer coefficient and
thermal conductivity to be both constant. . . .
2. Develop the overall heat transfer coefficient for the composite cylindrical pipes as
up of 0.15 m of building material. The oven operates at 870C and the outside temperature is
50C.
(a) How much heat is lost per m2 of the surface and (b) what are the temperatures at the
interfaces of the layers?
Data: The thermal conductivities of the materials of the bricks are as follows:
S.No.
Material
1.
2.
3.
Fire brick
Insulating brick
Building brick
0.5
0.225
0.60
8
THE GENERAL ENERGY EQUATION
In Chapter 7, we solved the simple, steady-state heat transfer problems by shell energy balance. It is
not always easy to solve the complex problems in such a way. So, it is necessary to develop general
energy equations and simplify them to solve particular problems.
Let us consider a fluid element of volume xyz as shown in Figure 8.1. The fluid carries different
forms of energies. It enters at the left-hand shaded portion as shown in the figure and leaves at the
right-hand shaded portion. Let us identify the different energies associated with the fluid. The transfer
of energy takes place by two modes, convection and molecular transport or conduction. Applying the
energy balance to the volume of the fluid xyz, we obtain
Rate of energy in
Rate of energy out
Rate of external work done by the system on the surrounding
= Rate of energy accumulation . . . (8.1)
In order to understand the general energy equation, let us take the x-component; similar equations can
be written for the y- and z-components.
(a) Energy associated by convection
This constitutes the internal energy and the kinetic energy. This is the energy associated with the
random movement of molecules and molecular interactions. These aspects are discussed in physics.
y-component: zx
z-component: xy
(b) Energy transport by conduction
x-component: yz
y-component: zx
z-component: xy
(c) Work done against the gravitational force
x-direction: txyz(vxgx)
y-direction: txyz(vygy)
z-direction: txyz(vzgz)
(d) Work done against the static pressure
x-direction: yz
y-direction: zx
z-direction: xy
(e) Net work done against the viscous forces
x-component:
(f) Rate of energy accumulated
It consists of an expression of kinetic energy and internal energy as follows:
Substituting the preceding values in Eq. (8.1) and dividing by xyz and taking the limits x 0, y 0, z 0,
we get
. . . (8.2)
We can write the general equation of energy in the following form:
. . . (8.3)
This general equation of energy is not easy to handle in this complicated way. So it is simplified by
using the equation of continuity and the equation of motion derived earlier in Chapter 3.
We can write the equation of energy for Newtonian fluids and constant thermal conductivity as
. . . (8.4)
where
This is called Fouriers second law of heat conduction.
engineering.
(a) Fluid at constant pressure
In Eq. (8.4),
. . . (8.5)
(b) For solids
In this case t is constant and v = 0.
. . . (8.6)
(c) Heat generation
If there is a heat produced in the fluid by chemical reaction or electrical means, then SV is added to
the energy equation. Thus,
. . . (8.7)
where SV = rate of heat generation, W/m3.
In order to solve the heat transfer problems, we can use the above general equation of energy in a
similar manner as we do for the equation of motion and the equation of continuity. The simplifications
are done with a view to discarding the terms which are not required.
General energy equations are useful tools for solving energy problems. Simplifications are done for
particular situations in the field of engineering applications.
9
TEMPERATURE DISTRIBUTIONIN
TURBULENT FLOW
In Chapter 7, we solved some of the heat conduction problems in laminar flow conditions. The
differential equations formed by shell balance have been solved by using the appropriate boundary
conditions and initial conditions.
To find the temperature profiles in turbulent flow, conditions are different. Sometimes, we create
turbulence in the system to enhance the heat transfer rates. Mixing takes place in the fluid. In order to
solve the heat transfer problems, many empirical methods are available in the literature.
The thermal problems can be understood in a similar pattern as that for the flow problems in a
system. Some of the concepts discussed are: time-smoothed temperature, thermal boundary-layer
thickness, and Prandtl mixing length models.
. . . (9.2)
All the properties of the velocity fluctuation hold good for the temperature fluctuation as well, for
example
will not be zero.
The time-smoothed equation of continuity and the equation of motion for a fluid with constant density
and viscosity were given in Eqs. (4.7) and (4.8). The energy Eq. (8.4) can be written for a fluid with
constant n, t, cp, and k as follows:
. . . (9.3)
Now for turbulent flow, let us substitute the terms
the time-smoothed equation becomes:
and
. . . (9.4)
We can observe that the time-smoothed equation has the same original form of the terms, except those
indicated with dashed terms. The turbulent heat flux
components can be defined as follows:
. . . (9.5)
. . . (9.6)
. . . (9.7)
To summarize, all the three equations of motion, continuity and energy can be written as the same
equations as discussed earlier but we have to change the vx and T terms by
and .
Figure 9.2 Thermal boundary layer for a flow past a flat plate.
. . . (9.9)
where cp = heat capacity in kJ/kg mol K.
The following assumptions are made:
1. Steady-state conditions prevail, i.e. T/t = 0.
2. The fluid properties such as density, viscosity, specific heat and thermal conductivity are
constant.
3. No heat is conducted in the z-direction.
4. The heat conduction in the x-direction is negligible in comparison to the heat conducted in the
y-direction.
With the above assumptions, the energy equation becomes
. . . (9.10)
The differential Eq. (9.10) can be solved with the help of boundary conditions.
Boundary condition 1: At y = 0, T = Ts . . . (9.11)
Boundary condition 2: At y = , T = T . . . (9.12)
Boundary condition 3: At x = 0, T = T . . . (9.13)
Let us see the similarity between the above energy equation and the equation of motion earlier
derived in Chapter 4. These equations are
. . . (4.14)
and
. . . (4.12)
The similarity of Eqs. (9.10) and (4.14) is clear. Blasius assumed the Prandtl number cp n/k = 1. In
such a case, the coefficients on the R.H.S. of Eqs. (4.14) and Eq. (9.10) are the same.
Now let us see the boundary conditions when we introduce the dimensionless temperature as (T
Ts)/(T T) and the dimensionless velocity as vx /v. The boundary conditions become:
Boundary condition 1: At y = 0,
Boundary condition 2: At x = 0,
Boundary condition 3: At y = ,
. . . (9.14)
. . . (9.15)
. . . (9.16)
We conclude that these equations and boundary conditions are identical for velocity profile and
temperature profile for the Prandtl number being equal to 1. Also for any x and y point, the
dimensionless velocity vx /v and the dimensionless temperature (T Ts)/(T Ts) are equal. Hence,
the solution of the velocity profile is applicable to the temperature profile solution, i.e. replacement
of v by T is feasible.
Therefore, the momentum transfer and heat transfer are analogous in the boundary-layer thickness. It
is concluded that the thermal boundary-layer thickness dT being equal to the hydrodynamic boundarylayer thickness d is valid only for the Prandtl number being equal to 1.
The above heat transfer equations are nonlinear and hence the solution becomes complex. Blausius
discussed the solution in a similar way as done for momentum transfer.
By combining Eqs. (4.16) and (4.17), we get
. . . (4.16)
. . . (4.17)
The velocity gradient at the surface is given by
. . . (9.17)
where
As discussed above,
. . . (9.18)
By combining Eqs. (9.17) and (9.18), we get the temperature gradient at the surface as
. . . (9.19)
The convective heat transfer qy (J/s) can be written from the Fouriers law as
. . . (9.20)
where hx is the heat transfer coefficient at a point x and k is the thermal conductivity.
Combining Eqs. (9.19) and (9.13), we get
. . . (9.21)
where
= Nusselt number.
Pohlhausen gave a relationship between the hydrodynamic boundary layer and the thermal boundary
layer for fluids. This is valid only for the Prandtl number more than 0.6. Thus,
. . . (9.22)
Then, the local heat transfer coefficient becomes
. . . (9.23)
Let us calculate the mean heat transfer coefficient between x = 0 andx = L for the whole length of the
plate, b = width of the plate,
A = area = bL
Substituting the value of hx from Eq. (9.23), we get
. . . (9.24)
Integrating Eq. (9.24), we get
. . . (9.25)
where
Suppose
T = deviation of temperature from the mean
= mean temperature
T = instantaneous temperature.
We can write the fluctuation of temperature as:
T
. . . (9.26)
Dividing both sides of Eq. (9.26) by L and taking the limit L 0, where L is small, we get
T
. . . (9.27)
Let the rate of heat transferred per unit area be qy /A. Now,
= (Mass)(Heat capacity)(Temperature difference)
= (tvy)cpT . . . (9.28)
where cp = specific heat capacity in kJ/kg K. Substituting T from Eq. (9.27), we have
. . . (9.29)
We assumed
10
UNSTEADY-STATE HEAT CONDUCTION IN A
SEMI-INFINITE SLAB
Heat conduction problems for laminar flow conduction have been solved for the steady-state
conditions in Chapter 7. We used the shell energy balance to formulate the differential equations.
Then, these differential equations were solved with the help of boundary conditions. In Chapter 8, we
developed the general energy equations. These equations are useful to tackle complex problems.
Sometimes we have to handle more than one variable. Generally, one variable is space and the other
variable becomes time. Such a situation is called unsteady state. A typical problem is solved in this
section.
Let us consider a semi-infinite plate. Initially, its surface is at temperature T0 at time t = 0. Suddenly,
the surface temperature is raised to T1. Let us consider the x-y coordinate system as shown in Figure
10.1. We are interested to know the temperature profile, T(y, t).
With the above assumptions, the energy Eq. (8.5) can be used to solve this problem.
. . . (8.5)
Dividing both sides of Eq. (8.5) by tcp, we get
100(10.1)
where a is the thermal diffusivity.
This differential equation can be solved with the help of the initial and boundary conditions.
Initial condition: At t 0, T = T0 for all y . . . (10.2)
Boundary condition 1: At y = 0, T = T1 for t > 0 . . . (10.3)
Boundary condition 2: At y = , T = T0 for t > 0 . . . (10.4)
We now introduce the dimensionless temperature i, defined as
. . . (10.5)
The above differential Eq. (10.1) becomes
. . . (10.6)
The boundary and initial conditions become
Initial condition: At t 0, i = 0 for all y . . . (10.7)
Boundary condition 1: At y = 0, i = 1 for t > 0 . . . (10.8)
Boundary condition 2: At y = , i = 0 for t > 0 . . . (10.9)
Just as we solved the velocity profile in Chapter 5, we also introduce the dimensionless distance y
here as:
. . . (10.10)
The differential equation (10.6) then becomes:
. . . (10.11)
The solution obtained is:
i=
. . . (10.12)
or i = 1 erf h . . . (10.13)
or
. . . (10.14)
The erf is called the error function. These functions can be solved using any mathematics handbook.
In real situations, we generally come across unsteady-state heat transfer problems. The number of
variables becomes more and the mathematical tools to solve the unsteady-state heat transfer
problems, become complicated. A simple case of heat conduction in a semi-infinite slab is solved in
this chapter by analytical methods.
Section C
MASS TRANSFER
11
MASS TRANSFER
In this Section C of the book, we will consider the third fundamental transport process, that is, mass
transfer. Just as we have seen Newtons equation for momentum transfer and Fouriers law of heat
conduction, we will now study the Ficks law for molecular diffusion of mass.
First, the silica plate is exposed to air and then to helium gas. Helium gas penetrates into the silica
plate. The molecular transport of one substance to another is called diffusion, concen-tration
diffusion or mass diffusion. The molecular transfer of mass takes place because of the concentration
difference. Here, the mass fraction wA is defined for species A as:
At time t = 0 or t < 0, the silica plate is exposed to air and there is no helium gas, i.e. wA = 0.
Suddenly, the silica plate is exposed to helium gas. As the time passes, the concentration of helium is
built up and later the steady-state concentration of helium is achieved. This process is shown in
Figure 11.2.
Figure 11.2 Steady-state concentration profile for diffusion of helium A into fused silica B.
The concentration of A at the top of the silica slab is zero and as time passes, the concentration profile
becomes straight. The x-y coordinates are selected. Let A be the area of the silica slab and Y be the
thickness. The mass flow of helium in the y-direction, wAy, is given as
wAy A
wAy
wAy
where
or
. . . (11.2)
where
t = density of the silicahelium system
DAB = diffusivity of silicahelium system
= proportionality constant called diffusivity, when A is diffusing in B
Here wAy/A is expressed as molar mass flux when species A is diffusing in the y-direction and is
denoted by jAy. The differential form of Eq. (11.2) becomes
. . . (11.3)
Equation (11.3) is called the Ficks law of diffusion. Here, jAy is the molecular mass flux of helium in
the positive direction of y. Helium is moving slowly and its concentration is very small. Equation
(11.3) is similar to Eq. (1.2) for molecular momentum transfer and similar to Eq. (6.5) for heat
conduction.
Similarly in other directions too, we can write the Ficks law as
. . . (11.4)
and
. . . (11.5)
where = divergence =
DAB DBA
The diffusivity of a system can be estimated by a number of methods. There are many empirical
equations available in the literature for the estimation of diffusivity for gases and liquids. Some of
them are:
(a) Reduced temperature and pressure and the corresponding reduced diffusivity, obtained from
critical values.
(b) ChapmanEnskog theory is applied for the estimation of diffusivity for gases at low density.
These are similar equations used for the estimation of viscosity as discussed earlier.
(c) Hydrodynamic theory as stated by the NernstEinstein equation is used for diffusion in binary
liquids.
In this book, we will not describe the estimation of diffusivity. This is well discussed in other
chemical engineering books.
For binary gas mixtures at low pressures, DAB is inversely proportional to pressure, increases with
increasing temperature and is almost independent of the composition for a given pair of gases.
The Ficks law of diffusion can be written in mass and molar units as
Mass units: jA = tA(vA v) = tDABwA . . . (11.11)
Molar units:
where
vA v = diffusion velocity of species A with respect to the mass average velocity v.
vA v* = diffusion velocity of species A with respect to the molar average velocity v*.
Let us say that the combined flux is the sum of the fluxes due to molecular diffusion and convective
diffusion. We can summarize the gradient and Ficks law of diffusion for mass and molar terms as
shown in Table 11.1A and Table 11.1B respectively.
Table 11.1A Mass Fluxes
Mass Units
Mode
Mass flux
Gradient
Ficks law
Molecular diffusion
jA
wA
jA = tDABwA
Convective diffusion
tv
vA v
Combined diffusion
nA
wA
nA = tAv tDABwA
or
nA = wA(nA + nB) tDABwA
Molar flux
Molecular diffusion
Convective diffusion
Combined diffusion
cv
NA
Gradient
Ficks law
xA
= cDABxA
*
v v
xA
*
NA = cv cDABxA
= xA(NA + NB)
cDABxA
Steady-state momentum balances have been made in shell momentum balances in Chapter 1. Also, we
have made shell energy balances for heat conduction in Chapter 6. After formulation of the steadystate differential equations, these equations have been solved by setting boundary conditions.
Similarly, we shall see that the steady-state diffusion problems may be formulated by shell mass
balances. The steps involved are as follows:
1. Select the coordinate system of the problem.
2. Select the shell, where mass balance has to be applied.
3. Under steady-state conditions, apply the shell balance as:
Rate of mass in of A Rate of mass out of A
+ Rate of mass of A produced by chemical reaction = 0 (11.13)
4. Express the terms on the basis of mass, if mass balance is to be applied. Otherwise, express the
terms in molar form for molar balance.
5. We have selected the fluxes as molecular, convective or combined as the case may be. Generally,
we select the combined flux and simplify the other terms.
6. Formulate the differential equation in terms of fluxes.
7. Integrate the differential equation formed and either keep the constant of integration or solve its
value from the physical concepts.
8. Apply the Ficks law of diffusion and formulate the differential equation for concentration.
9. Integrate the differential equation formed to get the concentration equation.
10. Apply the boundary conditions to solve for the constants of integration.
11. Get the concentration profile and solve other important items.
Before discussing the boundary conditions, let us discuss the molar flux and mass flux produced by
chemical reactions. Let NA be the number of moles of A diffusing per unit area per unit time in a
binary system. The molar flux of A in the z-direction can be written as:
. . . (11.14)
We may come across the problem of solving for NBz. This can be solved by physical or chemical
reasoning. One may say that in a system, A is diffusing but B is not diffusing. In such a case, NBz = 0.
In other cases, NAz/NBz may be known from the physical or chemical concepts.
The reactions may take place by two mechanisms:
1. Homogeneous reactions
2. Heterogeneous reactions
In homogeneous reactions, the source term may appear in the differential equations. This is similar to
the heat source problem for energy shell balances.
For heterogeneous reactions, there is no source term in the differential equations in the shell mass
balance. These differential equations can be solved with the help of boundary conditions. Let the
reaction be taking place as:
A products
The reaction rate equations can be written for homogeneous and heterogeneous reactions.
Homogeneous reaction:
RA = kncAn . . . (11.15)
Heterogeneous reaction:
NAz |surface = kn cAn |surface . . . (11.16)
where
RA = rate of reaction, in mol/m3 s
kn = reaction rate constant
cA = concentration of A, in mole of A/cm3
n = order of reaction, for first order n = 1
NAz = combined molar flux, in mol/cm2 s
kn = reaction rate constant based on the surface area
Boundary conditions:
1. The concentration at the surface may be specified, e.g. xA =
= given
. . . (11.17)
where
= molar flux of A at the surface
= concentration of A at the surface
cAb = concentration of A in the bulk fluid stream
kc = mass transfer coefficient, similar to heat transfer coefficient
4. The rate of chemical reaction may be specified, e.g.
. . . (11.18)
where k1 = rate constant for the first-order reaction based on the surface area.
SOLVED EXAMPLES
EXAMPLE 11.1 CO2 gas is diffusing through N2 in one direction at atmospheric pressure and
temperature 15C. The mole fraction of CO2 at point A is 0.2, at point B, 3 m away in the direction of
diffusion, it is 0.0195. The concentration gradient is constant over this distance and diffusivity is
1.5 105 m2/s. The gas phase as a whole is stationary, i.e. N2 is diffusing at the same rate as the
CO2, but in the opposite direction.
(a) What is the molar flux of CO2 in kmol/m2 s?
(b) What is the net mass flux in kg/m2 s?
Solution:
Let A be the CO2 species and B be the N2 species.
DAB = 1.5 105 m2/s
or
. . . (iv)
R = 8314
Substituting the above values in Eq. (iv), we get
= 1 0.2 = 0.8
mole fraction of B,
= 1 0.0195 = 0.9805
, can be written as
. . . (v)
Substituting the values in Eq. (v), we get
PROBLEMS
1. Prove that DAB is equal to DBA for an ideal gas. Is this relation true for a diffusion in a binary
liquid system?
2. A mixture of He and N2 gases is contained in a pipe at 298 K and 1 atm total pressure which is
constant. At one end of the pipe at point A (1), the partial pressure
the other end at 0.2 m,
12
SHELL MASS BALANCES AND
CONCENTRATION DISTRIBUTION FOR
LAMINAR FLOW
In Chapter 2, we developed the shell momentum balance for viscous flow. In Chapter 7, we
formulated the shell energy balance for heat conduction. In the same manner, in this chapter, we will
develop shell mass balances for laminar flow. All these problems are solved for the steady-state
conditions. The steps involved will be the same as those previously defined for momentum and heat
balances.
Mass balance is done over the shell to formulate the first-order differential equations. This will lead
to the solution for mass flux distribution.
Next, we will introduce the relation between the mass flux and the concentration gradient. This will
result in the differential equation for concentration distribution. On integration, we get the constants.
These constants are evaluated with the help of boundary conditions. These boundary conditions are
taken from the knowledge of physical concepts of the problem.
Several mass transfer problems are solved by considering the mass flux. Let NA, the mass flux, be
defined as the number of moles of A diffusing per unit area per unit time. Normally, we can express
the combined flux of A(NAz) in the z-direction as
. . . (11.14)
where if the B component is non-diffusing, then NB = 0, or where mostly the NBz/NAz ratio is
specified.
Section 12.1 deals with the simple diffusion problem. It will enable us to understand the mass
balance easily. Sections 12.2 and 12.3 discuss the diffusion problems with heterogeneous reaction.
The reaction may be instantaneous reaction or slow reaction. Section 12.4 deals with diffusion with
homogeneous reaction. Diffusion from a spherical droplet through a stagnant gas film is discussed in
Section 12.5. All these problems are solved for steady-state conditions.
or
. . . (12.6)
C2 = ln K2 . . . (12.12)
where K1 and K2 are constants. We obtain Eq. (12.10) as:
ln (1 xA) = ln (K1z K2)
or 1 xA = K1z K2 . . . (12.13)
Boundary condition 1:
At z = z1, xA = xA1 . . . (12.14)
Boundary condition 2:
At z = z2, xA = xA2 . . . (12.15)
. . . (12.16)
. . . (12.17)
Dividing Eq. (12.17) by Eq. (12.16), we obtain
or
. . . (12.18)
or
. . . (12.19)
(12.20)
or
. . . (12.21)
For component B
xB = 1 xA . . . (12.22)
The concentration profile is shown in Figure 12.1. The slope dxA/dz is not constant. The flux can be
obtained from Eq. (12.6).
Once the concentration profiles are known, then the average concentration and mass flux can be easily
calculated.
Average concentration
Let
. . . (12.23)
where Z is the dimensionless distance.
Let us write the average concentration for B:
. . . (12.24)
Boundary condition 1:
At z = z1, Z = 0 . . . (12.25)
Boundary condition 2:
At z = z2, Z = 1 . . . (12.26)
Now Eq. (12.24) becomes
. . . (12.27)
or
. . . (12.28)
. . . (12.29)
Thus, the average value of xB is the logarithmic mean, (xB)ln, of the terminal concentrations.
We again assume an idealized model for the system. Reactant A diffuses through the gas film
surrounded by the catalyst. At the catalyst surface, the reaction takes place instantaneously. After the
reaction, the product B diffuses back in the mainstream.
As the reaction takes place at the surface of the catalyst, the gas film and the surface of the catalyst are
as shown in Figure 12.3. Two moles of A are
Figure 12.3 Idealized model for a catalytic reaction, concentration profile and a shell for mass balance.
diffusing through the gas film and the reaction takes place at the surface of the catalyst. Then, the
product B formed diffuses back to the main stream. Reactant A is diffusing in the positive direction of
z, while the product B is diffusing in the negative direction of z. Although some heat is produced in
the catalytic reaction, we assume it to be very small and negligible.
The following assumptions are made:
1. Gas film surrounding the catalyst is isothermal, i.e. the temperature remains constant.
Therefore, DAB is constant.
2. Steady-state conditions prevail.
3. Diffusion of A and B takes place only in the z-direction.
Let us consider a shell at a distance z and of thickness z. NAz is the combined flux operating in the
system. Let us take, W as the width and L as the length of the shell for consideration. Now applying a
mass balance on the shell, we have
W LNAz |z W LNAz |z+z = 0 . . . (12.30)
Dividing both sides of Eq. (12.30) by WLz and taking the limit as z 0, we get
. . . (12.31)
The general Ficks law can be written as
. . . (12.32)
As discussed above, 2 moles of A penetrate the gas film and produce 1 mole of B, and B is moving in
the negative direction of z. So, the flux for B, NBz, can be written as
. . . (12.33)
Substituting this value of NBz in Eq. (12.32), we get
or
. . . (12.34)
or
. . . (12.35)
or
. . . (12.40)
. . . (12.44)
or
or
. . . (12.45)
or
. . . (12.46)
This is the concentration of A which is shown in Figure 12.3. The molar flux at the catalyst surface
can be calculated as
. . . (12.47)
Differentiating Eq. (12.46) w.r.t. z and taking the value at z = d, we obtain
. . . (12.48)
From the above, we can conclude:
1. Although chemical reaction occurs instantaneously at the surface of the catalyst, it appears as if
no reaction term appears and only diffusion takes place.
2. It is a series process. First, diffusion takes place and then the chemical reaction takes place.
3. A to B formation, we can say, is a diffusion controlled one for the case of an instantaneous
reaction.
Integrating this equation and putting proper constants of integration, we get the same relation as that of
Eq. (12.40), i.e.
Boundary condition 1:
At z = 0,
. . . (12.50)
Boundary condition 2:
At z = d, NAz = K1cxA . . . (12.51)
. . . (12.52)
At steady state, the flux NAz becomes constant. Substituting the value of boundary condition 2 in Eq.
(12.40), we get
or
. . . (12.53)
or
. . . (12.54)
From this equation, one can find out the flux at the catalyst surface. Differentiating Eq. (12.54) and
evaluating at z = d and substituting in Eq. (12.34), we get
. . . (12.55)
Let us analyse the result. We have obtained the combined effect of diffusion and chemical reaction.
The surface reaction kinetics is described by the term DAB/k1 d in Eq. (12.55). It is related to the
Damkhler number which describes the reaction kinetics as
. . . (12.56)
Two limiting cases may arise:
1. If k1 is large, the term
Let us take liquid B in a vessel and allow gas A to be absorbed in it. Here, a chemical reaction takes
place. The system is shown in Figure 12.4.
. . . (12.62)
This differential equation can be solved with the help of boundary conditions. We know the
concentration of A at the surface of the liquid, i.e.
. From the physical concept, it is understood
that no diffusion of A takes place at the bottom of the vessel, i.e. NAz = 0. Let us write the boundary
conditions:
Boundary condition 1:
At z = 0,
. . . (12.63)
Boundary condition 2:
At z = L, NAz = 0 or
. . . (12.64)
This second-order differential Eq. (12.62) can be solved with the help of definitions of the following
dimensionless numbers.
. . . (12.65)
. . . (12.66)
. . . (12.67)
where z is called Tiele modulus, which is a dimensionless number. It is the ratio of the chemical
reaction rate to the diffusion rate, i.e.
. . . (12.68)
By using the dimensionless variables, the differential Eq. (12.62) becomes
. . . (12.69)
This equation can easily be solved mathematically as
(D2 z2)b = 0 . . . (12.70)
where D2 = z2 or D = z.
b = C1eza + C2eza . . . (12.71)
where C1 and C2 are constants and can be solved with the help of boundary conditions.
Boundary conditon 1:
At a = 0, b = 1 . . . (12.72)
Boundary conditon 2:
At a = 1,
. . . (12.73)
or
. . . (12.75)
Substituting the values of a, b and z in Eq. (12.75) from the above, we get
. . . (12.76)
Figure 12.5 Diffusion through a spherical stagnant gas film surrounding a droplet of liquid A.
The radius of the liquid droplet is r1 and the radius of the stagnant gas film is r2. Let us consider a
shell of radius r and thickness r as shown in Figure 12.5. It is assumed that the diffusion takes place
only in the radial direction. Let us take the spherical coordinate system for mass balance. It is also
assumed that during diffusion, the temperature remains constant, i.e. DAB is constant.
We consider that NAr is the mass flux operating in the system.
Applying a mass balance over the shell, we get
Rate of mass in of A at r
Rate of mass out of A at r + r = 0 . . . (12.77)
4p(r2NAr)|r 4p(r2NAr)|r+r = 0 . . . (12.78)
Dividing both sides of Eq. (12.78) by 4pr and taking the limit r 0, we have
. . . (12.79)
Integrating Eq. (12.79), we get
r2NAr = C1 . . . (12.80)
where C1 is a constant.
It is also assumed that the concentration of A in the gas phase is xA1 at r = r1 and xA2 at r = r2 at the
outer edge of the film. These will be used as boundary conditions for evaluating the constants of
integration.
Boundary condition 1:
At r = r1, NAr = NAr1 . . . (12.81)
Substituting this value in Eq. (12.80), we have
. . . (12.82)
But by the Ficks law, NAr is given as
. . . (12.83)
Substituting this value in Eq. (12.79), we get
. . . (12.84)
At constant temperature, cDAB is constant. Integrating this equation, we get
. . . (12.85)
This equation gives the concentration profile.
If we integrate Eq. (12.83) between the limits at r1, xA =
and at r2, xA =
, we get
. . . (12.86)
where
SOLVED EXAMPLES
EXAMPLE 12.1 Methane gas is diffusing in a straight tube 0.1 m long containing helium at 298 K
and the total pressure is 1 atm (=1.01325 105 Pa). The partial pressure of methane is 1.4 104 Pa at
one end and 1.333 103 Pa at the other end. Helium gas is insoluble in methane and it is non-diffusing.
The diffusivity of methanehelium is 0.675 104 m2/s. Calculate the flux of methane at steady-state
conditions.
Solution:
Let methane = A and helium = B
z2 z1 = 0.1 m
Temperature, T = 298 K
Total pressure, p = 1.01325 105 Pa
Partial pressure of methane at point (1),
PROBLEMS
1. Derive an equation for the molar flux for a situation of diffusion of A in a stagnant gas B at
steady-state conditions. Specises A is assumed to be a spherical particle of radius r1.*. . . .
*
2. A sphere of naphthalene of radius 2 mm is suspended in a large volume of still air at 318 K and
1 atm pressure. The surface temperature of the naphthalene can be assumed to be at 318 K. Its
vapour pressure at 318 K is 0.555 mm Hg. The diffusivity of the naphthaleneair system at 318
K is 6.92 106 m2/s. Calculate the rate of evaporation of the naphthalene from the surface.
[Ans. 9.68 108 kg mol/s m2]
3. An ethanol (A)water (B) solution in the form of a stagnant film of 2 mm thickness at 293 K is in
surface contact with an organic solvent in which ethanol is soluble and water is insoluble. At
point 1 the concentration of ethanol is 16.8% (wt) and the solution density is 972.8 kg/m3. At
point 2, the concentration of ethanol is 6.8% and density is 988.1 kg/m3. The diffusivity of
ethanol is 0.74 109 m2/s. Calculate the steady-state flux NA. . . . [Ans. NA = 9 107
kmol/m2s]
4. Deduce an expression to find the rate of diffusion of gas A through a non-diffusing gas B. CO2 is
diffusing through N2 in one direction at atmospheric pressure at 15C. The mole fraction of
CO2 at point A is 0.2, and at point B, 3 m away in the direction of diffusion, it is 0.0195. The
concentration gradient is constant over this distance and diffusivity is 1.5 105 m2/s. The gas
phase as a whole is stationary, i.e. N2 is diffusing at the same rate as the CO2, but in the
opposite direction.
(a) What is the molar flux of CO2 in kmol/m2 s?
(b) What is the net mass flux in kg/m2 s?
(c) At what speed (m/s) would an observer have to move from one point to antoher so that the net
mass flux relative to him would be zero? . . .
[Ans. (a) 3.8 108 kg mol/m2 s, (b) 1.5 106 kg/m2 s, (c) 1.45 105 m/s]
5. Derive a concentration profile for a reaction 2A B. The reaction is not instantaneous at the
catalytic surface at z = d. Assume that the rate at which A disappears at the catalyst-coated
surface is proportional to the concentration of A in the fluid at the interface. That is,
NAz = k1CA
where k1 is the rate constant for the pseudo-first-order surface reaction.
6. Oxygen A is diffusing through carbon monoxide B under steady-state conditions, with CO nondiffusing. The total pressure is 1 105 N/m2 and the temperature is 0C. The partial pressures of
oxygen at two planes 2 mm apart are 13,000 and 6500 N/m2, respectively. The diffusivity of the
mixture is 1.87 105 m2/s. Calculate the rate of diffusion of oxygen. . . . [Ans. 2.67 105 kg
mol/m2 s]
7. The diffusivity of the pair O2CCl4 is determined by observing the steady-state evaporation of
liquid CCl4 contained in a vertical tube and in contact with O2 on top. The length of the tube
containing CCl4 is 17.1 cm above the gasliquid interface. The total pressure of the system is
755 mm Hg and the temperature is 0C. The vapour pressure of CCl4 at that temperature is 33
mm Hg. The cross-sectional area of the tube is 0.82 cm2. It is found that 0.0208 cm3 CCl4
evaporates in a 10-hour period after steady state has been attained. What is the diffusivity of the
system CCl4O2? . . . [Ans. 0.0636 cm2/s]
13
THE GENERAL EQUATIONOF DIFFUSION
In Chapter 12, we applied the mass balance on the shell and then formulated the differential equation.
Sometimes, it is not possible to formulate the problems by the shell balance. For such complicated
problems, we have to start from the general mass balance equations and simplify these general
equations with suitable assumptions. The mass flux equations are set up from these general mass
balances. Then, these diffusion equations can be used to solve any problem.
In Chapter 3, we developed the general equations of motion. In Chapter 8, the general energy
equations have been developed. Similarly, we shall develop the general diffusion equations in this
chapter.
Let us consider an element of x y z through which a fluid is flowing as shown in Figure 13.1.
. . . (13.4)
and
. . . (13.10)
or
. . . (13.12)
where
When we compare Eq. (13.12) with the heat transfer equation,
where a is the thermal diffusivity, we can note a similarity between these two equations. Equation
(13.12) is, therefore, also called the second Ficks law of diffusion.
If we include the convective mass transfer and the rate of reaction terms, then the general diffusion
Eq. (13.12) becomes
. . . (13.13)
where the second term v cA contributes towards the convective mass transfer term, and RA is the
rate of reaction.
The molar diffusion equation can be written as
. . . (13.14)
The simplification of Eq. (13.14) for the binary system results in:
(a) When tDAB is constant:
. . . (13.15)
(b) When the velocity is zero:
. . . (13.16)
In this chapter, the general equations of diffusion have been developed. The simplifications can be
done for particular situations of mass transfer.
14
CONCENTRATION DISTRIBUTION IN
TURBULENT FLOW
In Chapter 4, we discussed momentum transfer in turbulent flow. Similarly, in Chapter 9, we
discussed heat transfer for turbulent flow conditions. It is not required to repeat the physical mass
transfer phenomenon taking place in turbulent flow conditions. Instead, by analogy, we can explain the
concentration distribution in turbulent flow.
In Chapter 12, the equations of mass transfer or diffusion have been derived by considering the shell
mass balances. Then, the Ficks law of diffusion has been incorporated. By this method, one can
obtain the concentration distribution. In arriving at the concentration equation, we assumed the
laminar flow conditions, i.e. no turbulence. Also, we assumed the steady-state conditions.
In this chapter, we will understand the concentration distribution in turbulent flow conditions by timesmoothed concentration, boundary-layer thickness and Prandtl mixing length model. There are many
empirical correlations available in the literature for obtaining concentration distribution in turbulent
flow conditions.
Let
cA = molar concentration of A in the turbulent stream
cA = concentration fluctuation of A
= time-smoothed average concentration of A
Then cA =
+ cA . . . (14.1)
. . . (14.6)
where k1 is the rate constant for the first-order reaction.
Now replacing cA with
, vx with
, etc., we obtain
. . . (14.7)
When we compare this equation with the general equation of concentration, it appears to be the same,
the only difference being that cA is replaced by
which is the time-smoothed concentration.
It may also be noted that the reaction terms may differ for the higher-order reactions.
We may thus conclude that the concentration terms in the diffusion equations may be replaced by the
time-smoothed average concentration for turbulent flow conditions. We have also seen earlier that the
velocity terms are replaced by the time-smoothed velocity in the equation of continuity and equation
of motion for turbulent flow conditions. Similar is the situation for the temperature distribution
equations. So, we can write the fluxes for the turbulent flow conditions as follows:
Turbulent diffusion molar flux:
Turbulent momentum flux:
Turbulent heat flux:
a = thermal diffusivity
=
All these equations are solved with the help of boundary conditions and the equation of continuity, i.e.
. . . (14.14)
Equation (14.9) can be solved with the help of the dimensionless concentration boundary conditions,
i.e.
Boundary condition 1: At y = 0,
Boundary condition 2: At y = ,
. . . (14.15)
. . . (14.16)
For the momentum boundary-layer Eq. (14.12), the dimensionless boundary conditions are:
Boundary condition 1: At y = 0,
Boundary condition 2: At y = ,
. . . (14.17)
. . . (14.18)
Similarly, the dimensionless boundary conditions for the thermal boundary-layer Eq. (14.13) are:
At y = 0,
At y = ,
. . . (14.19)
. . . (14.20)
All the boundary-layer Eqs. (14.9), (14.12) and (14.13) for mass, momentum and heat transfer are
similar in nature. Also, when we look into the dimensionless boundary conditions for mass,
momentum and heat, the boundary-layer equations are similar in nature.
Blasius has formulated the solution for the convective mass transfer when the Schmidt number is 1.0.
The Schmidt number is defined as:
. . . (14.21)
i.e. o = DAB
The solutions for the momentum boundary-layer equations are valid for the mass boundary-layer
equations for Schmidt number 1.0. The Blasius solution for the momentum boundary-layer equation is
given as
. . . (14.22)
where
Comparing Eqs. (14.15) and (14.17), we get
. . . (14.23)
Differentiating Eq. (14.23), we have
. . . (14.24)
or
. . . (14.25)
Equation (14.29) holds good only when the Schmidt number is one.
For the Schmidt number not equal to 1.0, Pohlhausen gave a relationship between the hydrodynamic
boundary layer d and the concentration boundary-layer thickness dc as:
. . . (14.30)
where
Let cA be the deviation of concentration of A from the mean concentration and let
concentration of A. The fluctuation of concentration can be written as:
. . . (14.34)
be the mean
Dividing both sides of Eq. (14.34) by L and taking the limit when L 0, we get
. . . (14.35)
The rate of mass transferred per unit area (mass flux) is
velocity
The term
is given as:
is called eddy mass diffusivity, fm. For the molar mass diffusion, the Ficks law
. . . (14.40)
Combining Eqs. (14.39) and (14.40), we obtain the total mass flux as:
. . . (14.41)
Similar equations have been derived earlier for the momentum and heat transfer. The fluxes are given
as:
Momentum transfer:
. . . (14.42)
Heat transfer:
. . . (14.43)
where
ft = eddy momentum diffusivity
at = eddy thermal diffusivity.
In this chapter we have explained the mechanism of mass diffusion by three models: time-smoothed
concentration, boundary-layer thickness, and Prandtl mixing length.
15
UNSTEADY-STATE EVAPORATIONOF A
LIQUID
In Chapter 12, the steady-state diffusion problems have been solved. In such problems, the ordinary
differential equations have been formed by shell mass balances. These equations have been solved
with the help of boundary conditions to give the concentration profiles.
Many diffusion problems can be solved by looking into the solutions to the analogous of heat and
momentum transfer. But we come across binary or multi-component diffusion problems under
unsteady-state conditions. In this chapter, we shall try to understand how to solve simple diffusion
problems under unsteady-state conditions. As the chemical reactions take place along with diffusion,
these problems become more and more difficult. These problems can be solved with the help of
computers and analytical mathematical tools.
Let us take a case, where a liquid A (volatile) evaporates into pure B in a tube of infinite length.
Somehow, the liquid level is maintained at z = 0.
The following assumptions are made:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
. . . . (15.5)
. . . . (15.6)
Then, Eq. (15.1) will become
. . . . (15.7)
where
. . . . (15.8)
. . . . (15.9)
The initial and boundary conditions become
Initial condition: At t = 0, X = 0. . . . (15.10)
Boundary condition 1: At z = 0, X = 1. . . . (15.11)
Boundary condition 2: At z = , X = 0. . . . (15.12)
In Eq. (15.7), we can introduce
which will give the first-order differential equation as:
. . . . (15.13)
On integration, we get
. . . . (15.14)
Combining Eqs. (15.11) and (15.12), we get
. . . . (15.15)
Now, with the definition of error functions and their properties, we can write the solution as:
. . . . (15.16)
Section D
16
ANALOGIES AMONGMOMENTUM,
HEATAND MASS TRANSFER
What is an analogy? Resemblance and similarity are closely related to the term analogy. Hence an
analogy is an inference from one particular process to another where the conclusion is general.
The analogies are useful tools to understand the concept of transfer phenomena, and to the
professional as a sound means to predict the behaviour of the systems for which limited quantitative
data are available. Analogies will be used to elucidate the mechanism of transfer. Here, we are
considering the transfer of momentum, heat and mass. In all the cases, the analogy will be drawn in
terms of mechanism and mathematical expression. All the three of the molecular transport processes
momentum, heat and massare characterized by the same general type of equation as already
discussed, i.e.
In laminar flow conditions, it is easier to understand the mechanism of all these transfer processes.
Also, the mathematics involved is simple in nature. But the situation becomes complex under
turbulent flow conditions. In such cases, empirical correlations have been developed by scientists
and technologists.
First, with the development of flow meters like orifice meter and Pitot tube, the flow behaviour of
momentum transfer has been easy to understand. Mathematically too, simple equations explained the
momentum transfer under laminar and turbulent flow conditions. Correlations were developed for
friction factor and Reynolds number. Then, temperature-measuring devices were developed to
understand the mechanism of heat transfer. Analogies were developed for momentum and heat
transfer. A typical example is the Reynolds analogy and the Prandtl analogy for the case of momentum
and heat transfer. In the later period, modern instrumentation for the measurement of concentration of
species was developed. This helped understand mass transfer operations. Analogies were developed
among momentum, heat and mass transfer.
Applications of Analogies
1. Analogies help us understand the new processes in momentum, heat and mass transfer.
2. If we learn some phenomena in momentum transfer, by analogy, it can also be understood for
heat transfer and mass transfer.
3. The concept of friction factor in momentum transfer can lead us to evaluate the heat transfer
coefficient by applying the ChiltonColburn analogy. It can help us calculate the heat transfer
. . . (16.3)
For constant density and thermal conductivity:
or
. . . (16.4)
Mass transfer:
Ficks law of diffusion is:
. . . (16.5)
Now let us look at Eqs. (16.2), (16.4) and (16.5).
L.H.S.: flux
Momentum transfer: Momentum flux tyx (shear stress), force/area.
Heat transfer: Heat flux q/A, in J/s m2
Mass transfer: Mass flux J*Ax, in
R.H.S.: driving force
Momentum transfer: Momentum concentration tv, in (kg m/s)/m3
Heat transfer: Concentration of thermal energy tcpT, in J/m3
Mass transfer: Concentration of A, i.e. cA, in kg mol of A/m3
(c) Constants:
Momentum transfer: Momentum diffusivity n/t, in m2/s
Heat transfer: Thermal diffusivity k/tcp, in m2/s
Mass transfer: Molecular diffusivity of A in B, DAB, in m2/s
We conclude that all the three molecular transport processesmomentum, heat and massare
characterized by the same general type of equation, mathematically given by
. . . (16.6)
Equation (16.6) for molecular diffusion of the property momentum, heat or mass, can be written as
. . . (16.7)
where
zx = flux in the x-direction.
= gradient in the x-direction
d = constant.
Mathematically, these equations and notations are similar, but the process of momentum, heat and
mass may be different.
2. Convective Transfer
This mechanism of transport has been explained in Chapter 1. Each molecule carries the property of
momentum, heat and mass and transports it. The fluxes are given by:
Momentum transfer: vt v
where
Froud number =
Prandtl number =
Nusselt number =
=
Peclet number =
= (Reynolds number) (Prandtl number)
Mass transfer:
Schmidt number =
Lewis number =
Sherwood number =
These have been discussed in Chapters 1, 6 and 11 respectively. There are also similarities in
turbulent transport. The flux equations for momentum, heat and mass transfer in turbulent flow
conditions have been discussed in Chapters 4, 9, and 14 respectively. In turbulent flow, the fluxes are
written using the turbulent eddy momentum diffusivity ft, the turbulent eddy thermal diffusivity at, and
the turbulent eddy mass diffusivity fm. However, the similarities in turbulent flow conditions are
more difficult to correlate mathematically or physically.
All efforts have been made in the literature to develop the analogies between momentum, heat and
mass under turbulent flow conditions. Reynolds was the first to develop the similarity between heat
and momentum transfer for turbulent flow conditions. Let us first discuss the Reynolds analogy
between momentum and heat transfer and then that between momentum and mass transfer.
1. Momentum and Heat Transfer
For the molecular momentum transfer, the Newtons law can be written as
. . . (16.22)
where
= n = molecular momentum diffusivity, in m2/s
t = constant
Similarly, the momentum flux for the turbulent flow is written as
or
. . . (16.23)
where
= turbulent momentum flux
nt = eddy viscosity, property of flow conditions and not the fluid property
= time-smoothed average velocity in the x-direction
ft = momentum eddy diffusivity, in m2/s
For constant density, combining Eqs. (16.22) and (16.23), we obtain
. . . (16.24)
Similar equations can also be written for heat transfer. For molecular heat transfer, the Fouriers law
of heat conduction can be written as:
. . . (16.25)
For constant density and specific heat, we can write
. . . (16.26)
where
a = thermal diffusivity, in m2/s
=
For turbulent flow conditions:
. . . (16.27)
where
at = turbulent thermal diffusivity, in m2/s
= time-smoothed average temperature.
For constant t and cp, combining Eqs. (16.26) and (16.27), we get
. . . (16.28)
The following assumptions are made:
1. In turbulent flow, the molecular momentum and heat transfer are negligible, i.e. n/t and a are
small.
2. at = ft, i.e. momentum eddy diffusivity and thermal eddy diffusivity are equal.
Now, dividing Eq. (16.24) by Eq. (16.28) and simplifying with normal notations for temperature T
and velocity v, we get
. . . (16.29)
Let us consider a circular pipe through which the fluid is flowing.
The heat flux q/A is analogous to the momentum flux t which is considered constant in the turbulent
flow condition.
Let T = bulk temperature of the fluid
Ti = wall temperature of the pipe
or
. . . (16.31)
From the heat transfer coefficient h, the heat transfer is given by the Newtons law:
= h(T Ti) . . . (16.32)
From the fluid flow, we can evaluate the shear stress at the wall from the Fanning friction factor
concepts, i.e.
. . . (16.33)
i.e.
or
. . . (16.34)
. . . (16.35)
Substituting the value of q/A from Eq. (16.32) and that of ts from Eq. (16.35) in Eq. (16.31), we get
. . . (16.36)
. . . (16.37)
where
. . . (16.38)
The Reynolds anology assumes that Eq. (16.36) holds good only when the Prandtl number is equal to
1.0. This is the limitation of Reynolds analogy. In literature for circular tubes, the Prandtl number
varies from 0.7 to 0.9 and for other conditions, it varies from 0.5 to 1.0.
2. Momentum and Mass Transfer
For mass transfer, similar equations can be written as done above for molecular mass diffusion and
turbulent mass diffusion by using the Ficks law. As we have defined the heat transfer coefficient by
Eq. (16.32), similarly, we can write the mass transfer coefficient as
. . . (16.39)
where
cA = concentration of A, in kg mol/m3.
cAi = concentration of A at the interface, in kg mol/m3.
kc = mass transfer coefficient, in kg mol/s m2. conc. diff.
And the Ficks law is written as:
. . . (16.40)
By combining Eqs. (16.24), (16.39) and (16.40), integrating between the limits as done for heat
transfer and assuming the Schmidt number to be 1.0, i.e.
NSc = Schmidt number
=
we obtain
. . . (16.41)
Now, combining Eqs. (16.36) and (16.41), we get the Reynolds analogy between momentum, heat and
mass transfer.
. . . (16.42)
Figure 16.1 Four zones near the solid surface of the fluid for turbulent flow.Zone I: viscous sublayer; Zone II: buffer sublayer; Zone
III: inertial sublayer; Zone IV: turbulent core zone.
Let us consider the transport of momentum and heat in a circular pipe under the turbulent conditions.
There are two layers of movement of momentum and heat:
1. Laminar sublayer (near to the wall)
2. Turbulent core region (centre of the pipe)
In the laminar sublayer, all the equations and laws of momentum and heat transfer for laminar flow
conditions pervail. There is no mixing and turbulence in this sublayer.
Figure 16.2 Temperature and velocity profiles in the laminar sublayer in a circular pipe.
We can write the Newtons law of viscosity for momentum transfer and the Fouriers law of heat
conduction for heat transfer for laminar sublayer as follows:
Momentum transfer:
. . . (16.43)
. . . (16.44)
Heat transfer:
. . . (16.45)
. . . (16.46)
For turbulent flow conditions, these equations are modified to include eddy terms:
Momentum transfer:
. . . (16.47)
Heat transfer:
. . . (16.48)
where
ft = turbulent eddy momentum diffusivity, in m2/s
at = thermal eddy diffusivity, in m2/s.
Substituting the values of ft and at for the laminar sublayer, i.e. ft = 0,at = 0 in Eqs. (16.47) and
(16.48) and integrating over the limit d for r, we obtain
. . . (16.49)
. . . (16.50)
where
qw = heat flux at the wall
vd = velocity of the fluid at the edge of the laminar sublayer
Td = temperature of the fluid at the edge of the laminar sublayer
tw = momentum flux at the wall.
Eliminating d from Eqs. (16.49) and (16.50), we get
. . . (16.51)
Now consider momentum and heat transfer for the turbulent core region beyond r = d. Let R be the
radius of the pipe. Neglecting the molecular momentum and molecular heat transfer terms, Eq. (16.47)
and (16.48) become
. . . (16.52)
. . . (16.53)
Let us integrate Eqs. (16.52) and (16.53) and introduce the following concepts.
The shear stress at the wall, tw, is given by
. . . (16.54)
and the heat flux at the wall, qw, is given by the Newtons law of cooling
. . . (16.55)
where
f = Fanning friction factor
h = heat transfer coefficient
Tb = bulk fluid temperature
Also, v = vm vd . . . (16.56)
where vm = mean velocity of the fluid.
Here, the velocity gradient is (vm vd) and the temperature gradient is(Td Tb).
It is assumed that the momentum eddy diffusivity ft is equal to the thermal eddy diffusivity at, i.e.
ft = at . . . (16.57)
Substituting these terms in Eqs. (16.54) and (16.55), we get
or
. . . (16.58)
. . . (16.59)
Now, we get
. . . (16.60)
Eliminating Td from Eqs. (16.51) and (16.60), we obtain
. . . (16.61)
Now, vd can be expressed in terms of tw whereas vm can be expressed by using the universal
velocity in the laminar sublayer.
In the laminar sublayer, we define the dimensionless velocity vd+ and dimensionless distance y+ as
. . . (16.62)
which is applicable for y+ = 5.
So,
. . . (16.63)
Substituting the value of vd from Eq. (16.63) in Eq. (16.61) and using the following values
(Prandtl number)
we get
. . . (16.64)
or
. . . (16.65)
This relationship is called the Prandtl analogy. Also it gives a relationship between the Stanton
number and the Fanning friction factor as
. . . (16.66)
where
Under the turbulent flow conditions, the fluid behaviour is very different than that under the laminar
flow conditions. In the laminar flow, the situation is simple and the mechanism is easily understood.
There are many empirical expressions developed in the literature for turbulent flow conditions.
Let us analyse the flow near a flat surface as shown in Figure 16.3.
Figure 16.3 Flow regions for turbulent flow near a flat surface.
It is convenient to describe the flow of fluid near the solid surface by four zones. The zones are small
and close to the solid surface (but for clarity these are shown bigger).
Zone 1: The viscous sublayer: This zone is very close to the wall in which the viscosity of the fluid
plays an important role.
Zone 2: The buffer sublayer: This is the transition zone which occurs between the viscous and
inertial sublayers.
Zone 3: The inertial sublayer: In this zone, the turbulence just starts and viscosity plays a minor role.
Zone 4: The main turbulent stream: In this zone, the time-smoothed velocity distribution is important
and viscosity is negligible.
In the Prandtl analogy, the viscous sublayer and the turbulent bulk zone have been considered. Von
Krmn modified the Prandtl analogy by considering the buffer sublayer as well.
Von Krmn developed the analogy based upon the universal velocities for a smooth circular pipe. As
discussed above, the universal velocities are:
Zone 1: Viscous sublayer
. . . (16.67)
Zone 2: Buffer sublayer
. . . (16.68)
Zone 3: Turbulent core region
. . . (16.69)
where v+ is the dimensionless velocity and y+ the dimensionless distance.
Now,
. . . (16.70)
. . . (16.71)
or
. . . (16.72)
. . . (16.73)
where
n = kinematic viscosity, n/t
t0 = shear stress at the wall.
Equations (16.67) to (16.69) for these zones are shown in Figure 16.4.
Figure 16.4 Universal velocity profile for turbulent flow in circular pipe.
Von Krmn included buffer zone too, along with viscous sublayer and turbulent core zone. The
Nusselt number is given by the following relation, in terms of friction factor:
. . . (16.74)
where
NRe = Reynolds number
NPr = Prandtl number.
This is called von Krmn analogy. There are several other analogies given in the literature.
Apart from correlations, these charts are also drawn between the jH factor and the Reynolds number
as shown in Figure 16.5.
Here,
. . . (16.79)
Chilton and Colburn observed that there is a relationship between the heat transfer coefficient and the
friction factor. This analogy is based upon experimental data for gases and liquids for laminar flow
conditions and turbulent flow. Initially, this analogy was observed between momentum and heat
transfer. Later on, it was extended to mass transfer as well. Accordingly, for highly turbulent flow,
NRe > 10,000:
. . . (16.80)
Mass transfer and momentum transfer:
For mass transfer, the jD factor is defined as
. . . (16.81)
where
with
n = viscosity of the fluid
t = density of the fluid
kc = mass transfer coefficient
DAB = diffusivity
D = diameter of the pipe
L = length of the pipe.
The empirical correlation for the Sherwood number is given as
NSh = 0.332(NRe)1/2(NSc)1/3 . . . (16.82)
For flow past a flat plate or in a pipe, where there is no form of the drag present, the ChiltonColburn
analogy is given as:
. . . (16.83)
This analogy is valid for turbulent flow when NRe > 10,000 and 0.6 < NPr < 100 and tube L/D > 60.
Applications:
1. ChiltonColburn analogy is useful to obtain the heat transfer coefficient for an unknown
system where the hydrodynamic situation is understood.
2. It is used for the flow over a flat plate or the flow in a pipe.
3. For a situation where the drag is present (e.g. packed bed) or flow past blunt objects, f / 2 is
greater than jH or jD.
4. The mass transfer coefficient cannot be obtained from the analogous to heat transfer
coefficient correlations. For the mass transfer, different boundary conditions pervail.
SOLVED EXAMPLES
EXAMPLE 16.1 An oil is manufactured by the vapour phase catalytic reaction. The reaction gas
mixture leaving the catalytic reactor in the plant is condensed in a shell-and-tube heat exchanger. The
condensation occurs on the shell side while the cooling water flows through the tubes. The tubes are 3
m long and 25 mm outside diameter, 14 BWG (Birmingham Wire Gauge). Water flows at a rate of
0.057 m3/min per tube. Water enters at 32C. The tube wall temperature may be assumed to be
constant at 80C. Calculate the heat transfer coefficient by the Reynolds analogy.
Data:
Properties of water:
Density, t = 995 kg/m3
Viscosity, n = 7.65 104 kg/m s
Thermal conductivity, k = 0.623 W/m C
Velocity,
By the Reynolds analogy, the heat transfer coefficient h can be calculated as:
. . . (i)
. . . (ii)
f = 4.85 103
Substituting the values in Eq. (i), we get
h = 27.17 W/m2 C
EXAMPLE 16.2 Repeat Example 16.1 by using the Prandtl analogy.
Solution: By the Prandtl analogy, the heat transfer coefficient can be calculated as:
. . . (i)
We have calculated f as
f = 4.85 103
NPr = 5.12
Substituting the values in Eq. (i), we get
h = 13.45 W/m2 C
EXAMPLE 16.3 Repeat Example 16.1 using the von Krmn analogy.
Solution: By the von Krmn analogy, we can calculate the heat transfer coefficient as:
. . . (i)
f = 4.85 103
NPr = 5.12
But
f = 4.85 103
NRe = 7.44 104
NPr = 5.12
Substituting the values in Eq. (i), we get
h = 9.14 W/m2 C
PROBLEMS
1. Aniline is manufactured by the vapour phase catalytic reaction of nitrobenzene and hydrogen.
The reaction gas mixture leaving the catalytic reactor in an aniline plant is condensed in a shelland-tube heat exchanger. The condensation occurs on the shell side while the cooling water
flows through the tubes. The tubes are 3 m long and 25 mm outside diameter, 14 BWG. Water
flows at a rate of 0.057 m3/min per tube. Water enters at 32C. The tube wall temperature may
be assumed to be constant at 80C. Calculate the rise in the temperature of water as it flows
through the tube. The heat transfer coefficient may be estimated from the DittusBoelter
equation. Compare the results from different analogies.
Data:
Internal diameter of the tube (14 BWG) = 21.2 mm
Density of water at 32C, t = 995 kg/m3
Viscosity of water at 32C, n = 7.65 104 kg/m s
Specific heat of water at 32C, cp = 4.17 kJ/kg C
Thermal conductivity, k = 0.623 W/m C
Assume: one tube.
The Fanning friction factor,
f = 0.0014 + 0.125(Re)0.32
2. What is analogy? Discuss the analogy among momentum transfer, heat transfer and mass transfer
with respect to transport mechanism.
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A
CONVERSION FACTORSAND
FUNDAMENTAL UNITS
A.1 VOLUME AND DENSITY
1 g mol ideal gas at 0C, 760 mm Hg = 22.4140 litres = 22.414 cm3
1 lb mol ideal gas at 0C, 760 mm Hg = 359.05 ft3
1 kg mol ideal gas at 0C, 760 mm Hg = 22.414 m3
Density of dry air at 0C, 760 mm Hg = 1.2929 g/litre = 0.080711 lbm/ft3
Molecular weight of air = 28.97 lbm/lb mol = 28.97 g/g mol
1 g/cm3 = 62.43 lbm/ft3 = 1000 kg/m3
1 g/cm3 = 8.345 lbm/U.S. gal
1 lbm/ft3 = 16.0185 kg/m3
A.2 LENGTH
1 in. = 2.540 cm
100 cm = 1 m (metre)
1 micron = 106 m = 104 cm = 103 mm = 1 m (micrometre)
1 (angstrom) = 1010 m = 104 m
1 mile = 5280 ft
1 m = 3.2808 ft = 39.37 in.
A.3 MASS
1 lbm = 453.59 g = 0.45359 kg
1 lbm = 16 oz = 7000 grains
1 kg = 1000 g = 2.2046 lbm
1 ton (short) = 2000 lbm
1 ton (long) = 2240 lbm
1 ton (metric) = 1000 kg
g = 9.80665 m/s2
g = 980.665 cm/s2
g = 32.174 ft/s2
gc (gravitational conversion factor) = 32.1740 lbm ft/lbf s2
= 980.665 gm cm/gf s2
A.5 VOLUME
1 L (litre) = 1000 cm3
1 in.3 = 16.387 cm3
1 m3 = 1000 L (litre)
1 U.S. gal = 4 qt
A.6 FORCE
1 g cm/s2 (dyne) = 105 kg m/s2 = 105 N (newton)
1 g cm/s2 = 7.2330 105 lbm ft/s2 (poundal)
1 kg m/s2 = 1 N (newton)
1 lbf = 4.4482 N
1 g cm/s2 = 2.2481 106 lbf
1 dyne = 2.2481 106 lbf
A.7 PRESSURE
1 bar = 1 105 Pa (pascal) = 1 105 N/m2
1 psia = 1 lbf/in.2
1 psia = 2.0360 in. Hg at 0C
1 psia = 2.311 ft H2O at 70F
1 psia = 51.715 mm Hg at 0C (tHg = 13.5955 g/cm3)
1 atm = 14.696 psia = 1.01325 105 N/m2 = 1.01325 bar
1 atm = 760 mm Hg at 0C = 1.01325 105 Pa = 1.01325 102 kPa
1 atm = 29.921 in. Hg at 0C
1 atm = 33.90 ft H2O at 4C
1 psia = 6.89476 104 g/cm s2
A.8 POWER
1 hp = 0.74570 kW
1 hp = 550 ft lbf/s
1 hp = 0.7068 btu/s
1 J/s (joule/s) = 1 W
A.12 VISCOSITY
A.13 DIFFUSIVITY
1 cm2/s = 3.875 ft2/h
1 cm2/s = 104 m2/s
A.18 TEMPERATURE
0C = 32F (freezing point of water)
1.0 K = 1.0C = 1.8F = 1.8R (Rankine) (as per scale)
F = 32 + 1.8 (C)
C = (1/1.8)(F 32)
R = F + 459.67
K = C + 273.15
100C = 212F = 373.15 K = 671.67R
0C = 32F = 273.15 K = 491.67R
273.15C = 459.67F = 0 K = 0R (absolute zero)
APPENDIX B
Units
1.9872
g cal / g mol K
1.9872
btu / lb mol R
82.057
3
cm atm / g mol K
8314.34
J / kg mol K
3
82.057 10
3
m atm / kg mol K
8314.34
2 2
kg m /s kg mol K
10.731
3
2
ft lb f / in. lb mol R
0.7302
3
ft atm / lb mol R
1545.3
ft lb f / lb mol R
8314.34
3
m Pa / kg mol K
APPENDIX C
Density
3
g/m
3
kg/m
273.15
0.99987
999.87
277.15
1.00000
1000.00
283.15
10
0.99973
999.73
293.15
20
0.99823
998.23
298.15
25
0.99708
997.08
303.15
30
0.99568
995.68
313.15
40
0.99225
992.25
323.15
50
0.98807
988.07
333.15
60
0.98324
983.24
343.15
70
0.97781
977.81
353.15
80
0.97183
971.83
363.15
90
0.96534
965.34
373.15
100
0.95838
958.38
Viscosity
3
3
[(Pa s)10 , (kg/m s)10 , or cP]
273.15
1.7921
275.15
1.6728
277.15
1.5674
279.15
1.4728
281.15
1.3860
283.15
10
1.3077
285.15
12
1.2363
287.15
14
1.1709
289.15
16
1.1111
291.15
18
1.0559
293.15
20
1.0050
293.35
20.2
1.0000
295.15
22
0.9579
297.15
24
0.9142
298.15
25
0.8937
299.15
26
0.8737
301.15
28
0.8360
303.15
30
0.8007
305.15
32
0.7679
307.15
34
0.7371
309.15
36
0.7085
311.15
38
0.6814
313.15
40
0.6560
315.15
42
0.6321
317.15
44
0.6097
319.15
46
0.5883
321.15
48
0.5683
323.15
50
0.5494
325.15
52
0.5315
327.15
54
0.5146
329.15
56
0.4985
331.15
58
0.4832
333.15
60
0.4688
335.15
62
0.4550
337.15
64
0.4418
339.15
66
0.4293
341.15
68
0.4174
343.15
70
0.4061
345.15
72
0.3952
347.15
74
0.3849
349.15
76
0.3750
351.15
78
0.3655
353.15
80
0.3565
355.15
82
0.3478
357.15
84
0.3395
359.15
86
0.3315
361.15
88
0.3239
363.15
90
0.3165
365.15
92
0.3095
367.15
94
0.3027
369.15
96
0.2962
371.15
98
0.2899
373.15
100
0.2838
Heat Capacity, cp
cal / g C
kJ / kg K
273.15
1.0080
4.220
10
283.15
1.0019
4.195
20
293.15
0.9995
4.185
25
298.15
0.9989
4.182
30
303.15
0.9987
4.181
40
313.15
0.9987
4.181
50
323.15
0.9992
4.183
60
333.15
1.0001
4.187
70
343.15
1.0013
4.192
80
353.15
1.0029
4.199
90
363.15
1.0050
4.208
100
373.15
1.0076
4.219
Thermal Conductivity
btu / h ft F
W/m K
32
273.15
0.329
0.569
37.8
100
311.0
0.363
0.628
93.3
200
366.5
0.393
0.680
148.9
300
422.1
0.395
0.684
215.6
420
588.8
0.376
0.651
326.7
620
599.9
0.275
0.476
cP
3
n 10
(lb m / ft s)
k
(btu / h ft F)
NPr
4
b 10
(1/R)
2 2
(gbt /n )
6
10
3
(1/R ft )
T
(F)
3
(lb m / ft )
(btu / lb m F)
32
62.4
1.01
1.20
0.329
13.3
0.350
60
62.3
1.00
0.760
0.340
8.07
0.800
17.2
80
62.2
0.999
0.578
0.353
5.89
1.30
48.3
100
62.1
0.999
0.458
0.363
4.51
1.80
107
150
61.3
1.00
0.290
0.383
2.72
2.80
403
200
60.1
1.01
0.206
0.393
1.91
3.70
1010
250
58.9
1.02
0.160
0.395
1.49
4.70
2045
300
57.3
1.03
0.130
0.395
1.22
5.60
3510
400
53.6
1.08
0.0930
0.382
0.950
7.80
8350
500
49.0
1.19
0.0700
0.349
0.859
11.0
17350
600
42.4
1.51
0.0579
0.293
1.07
17.5
30300
APPENDIX D
PROPERTIES OF LIQUIDS
Table D.1 Heat Capacities of Liquids (cp = kJ/kg K)
K
cp
Acetic acid
273
311
1.959
2.240
Acetone
273
293
2.119
2.210
Aniline
273
323
2.001
2.181
Benzene
293
333
1.700
1.859
Butane
273
2.300
i-Butyl alcohol
303
2.525
Ethyl alcohol
273
298
2.240
2.433
Formic acid
273
289
1.825
2.131
Glycerol
288
305
2.324
2.412
273
293
2.43
2.474
Mercury
293
0.01390
Methyl alcohol
293
313
2.512
2.583
Nitrobenzene
283
303
363
1.499
1.419
1.436
293
330
3.39
3.43
293
1.403
Toluene
273
323
1.616
1.763
o-Xylene
303
1.721
Liquid
100%
293
0.171
50%
293
0.346
Ammonia
243258
0.502
n-Amyl alcohol
303
0.163
373
0.154
303
0.159
Liquid
Acetic acid
Benzene
333
0.151
273
0.185
341
0.163
303
0.147
333
0.144
293
0.175
100%
293
0.182
60%
293
0.305
20%
293
0.486
100%
323
0.151
Ethylene glycol
273
0.265
Glycerol, 100%
293
0.284
n-Hexane
303
0.138
333
0.135
293
0.149
348
0.140
100%
293
0.215
60%
293
0.329
20%
293
0.492
100%
323
0.197
n-Octane
303
0.144
333
0.140
25%
303
0.571
12.5%
303
0.589
90%
303
0.364
60%
303
0.433
Vaseline
332
0.183
Carbon tetrachloride
n-Decane
Ethyl acetate
Ethyl alcohol
Kerosene
Methyl alcohol
NaCl brine
Sulfuric acid
APPENDIX E
Properties of Gases
Table E.3 Thermal Conductivities of Gases and Vapours at 101.325 kPa(1 Atm Abs); k = W/m K
K
Acetone
273
319
373
457
0.0099
0.0130
0.0171
0.0254
Ammonia
273
373
473
0.0218
0.0332
0.0484
Butane
273
373
0.0135
0.0234
Carbon monoxide
173
273
373
0.0152
0.0232
0.0305
Chlorine
273
0.00744
Ethane
239
273
373
0.0149
0.0183
0.0303
Ethyl alcohol
293
373
0.0154
0.0215
Ethyl ether
273
319
373
0.0133
0.0171
0.0227
Ethylene
273
323
373
0.0175
0.0227
0.0279
n-Hexane
273
293
0.0125
0.0138
Sulfur dioxide
273
373
0.0087
0.0119
Gas or Vapour
Table E.4 Viscosity of Gases at 101.325 kPa (1 Atm Abs) [Viscosity in (Pa s)103, (kg/m s)103, or cP]
Temperature
K
H2
O2
N2
CO
CO2
255.4
17.8
0.00800
0.0181
0.0158
0.0156
0.0128
273.2
32
0.00840
0.0192
0.0166
0.0165
0.0137
283.2
50
10.0
0.00862
0.0197
0.0171
0.0169
0.0141
311.0
100
37.8
0.00915
0.0213
0.0183
0.0183
0.0154
338.8
150
65.6
0.00960
0.0228
0.0196
0.0195
0.0167
366.5
200
93.3
0.0101
0.0241
0.0208
0.0208
0.0179
394.3
250
121.1
0.0106
0.0256
0.0220
0.0220
0.0191
422.1
300
148.9
0.0111
0.0267
0.0230
0.0231
0.0203
449.9
350
176.7
0.0115
0.0282
0.0240
0.0242
0.0215
477.6
400
204.4
0.0119
0.0293
0.0250
0.0251
0.0225
505.4
450
232.2
0.0124
0.0307
0.0260
0.0264
0.0236
533.2
500
260.0
0.0128
0.0315
0.0273
0.0276
0.0247
APPENDIX F
Properties of Solids
Table F.1 Heat Capacities of Solids (cp = kJ/kg K)
K
cp
373
0.84
1773
1.147
Solid
Aluminia
Asbestos
1.05
Asphalt
0.92
Brick, fireclay
373
0.829
1773
1.248
Cement, portland
0.779
Clay
0.938
Concrete
0.63
Corkboard
303
0.167
Glass
0.84
Magnesia
373
0.980
1773
0.787
Oak
2.39
Pine, yellow
Porcelain
298
2.81
293373
0.775
Rubber, vulcanized
2.01
Steel
0.50
Wool
1.361
Benzoic acid
293
1.243
Camphene
308
1.591
Caprylic acid
271
2.629
Dextrin
273
1.218
Formic acid
273
1.800
Glycerol
273
1.382
Lactose
293
1.202
Oxalic acid
323
1.612
Tartaric acid
309
1.202
Urea
293
1.340
3
t (kg/m )
Asbestos
577
Asbestos sheets
889
Brick, building
Brick, fireclay
*
t (C)
k (W/m K)
0.151 (0C)
51
0.166
20
0.69
1.00 (200C)
0.168 (37.8C)
0.190 (93.3C)
1.47 (600C)
1.64 (1000C)
1666
4.5
0.57
0.762
Corkboard
160.2
Cotton
80.1
30
0.0433
Felt, wool
330
30
0.052
237
21
0.048
0.055 (0C)
Glass, window
0.068 (93.3C)
0.0414 (37.8C)
0.0549 (93.3C)
0.071 (93.3C)
0.062 (93.3C)
0.080 (204.4C)
0.066 (148.9C)
0.0391 (37.8C)
0.0395 (37.8C)
0.0486 (93.3C)
0.0518 (93.3C)
0.521.06
Glass fibre
64.1
30
0.0310 (6.7C)
Ice
921
2.25
Magnesia, 85%
271
208
825
15
0.208
545
15
0.151
0.068 (37.8C)
0.059 (37.8C)
Paper
Polystyrene board
0.061 (37.8C)
0.130
16
0.040
2440
0.0230.026
Rock wool
192
128
0.0317 (6.7C)
0.0296 (6.7C)
Rubber, hard
1198
0.151
4% H2O
1826
4.5
1.51
10% H2O
1922
4.5
2.16
Sandstone
2243
40
1.83
Snow
559
0.47
Polyurethane
sprayed foam
Sand soil
APPENDIX G
APPENDIX H
APPENDIX I
This form of the energy equation is also valid under the less stringent assumptions k = constant and ( ln t/ ln T)p Dp/Dt = 0. The
assumption t = constant is given in the table heading because it is the assumption more often made.
The term nv is usually negligible, except in systems with large velocity gradients.
APPENDIX J
APPENDIX K
INDEX
Analogy, 165
among momentum, heat and mass transfer, 166
ChiltonColburn, 184
Prandtl, 177
Reynolds, 173
Von Krmn, 182
Boundary conditions
eat transfer, 66
mass transfer, 123
momentum transfer, 9
Boundary-layer thickness
heat transfer, 105
mass transfer, 152
momentum transfer, 50
ChiltonColburn analogy, 184
Circular tube, 18
Concentration distribution, 128
Convective energy, 63
Convective mass flux, 121
Convective momentum flux, 8
Convective transport
heat, 63
mass, 120
momentum, 7
Convective molar flux, 121
Cooling fin, 79
Diffusion
equation, 147
through a spherical stagnant gas film, 141
through a stagnant gas film, 129
with a heterogeneous chemical reaction, 133
with a heterogeneous chemical reaction (slow reaction), 136
with a homogeneous chemical reaction, 138
Energy equation, 99
Equation
of change for isothermal system, 36
of continuity, 36
of motion, 38
Falling film, 13
Ficks law, 117
Flow
of a liquid falling film, 13
of two immiscible fluids, 30
through a circular tube, 18
through an annulus, 26
Fouriers law of heat conduction, 61
Heat conduction
from a sphere to a stagnant fluid, 82
in a cooling fin, 79
with a chemical reaction heat source, 88
with a viscous heat source, 85
with electrical heat source, 69
with nuclear heat source, 72
through composite walls, 76
Isothermal system, 36
Laminar flow, 13
in a narrow slit, 22
Lewis number, 172
Mass fluxes, 121
Mechanism of momentum transfer, 4
Molecular energy transfer, 61
Molecular fluxes, 7
Molecular transfer
heat, 61
mass, 117
momentum, 5
Momentum transfer, 3
in turbulent flow, 46
NavierStokes equations, 38, 42
Newtons law of viscosity, 5
Nusselt number, 172
Prandtl analogy, 177
Prandtl mixing length
heat transfer, 109
mass transfer, 156
momentum transfer, 53
Prandtl number, 172
Reynolds analogy, 173
Reynolds number, 172
Schmidt number, 172
Shear stress, 6
Shell balances
heat, 65
mass, 122
momentum, 8
Sherwood number, 156
Temperature distribution, 68
Time-smoothed concentration, 150
Time-smoothed equation of change for turbulent flow, 47
Turbulent
heat transfer, 103
mass transfer, 150
momentum transfer, 46
Unsteady-state condition