Professional Documents
Culture Documents
BY
NOR HAYATI BINTI ABDUL HAMID
TURAHIM ABD HAMID
ZAHRULLAILI YAHYA
APRIL 2009
AUTHORS
NOR HAYATI ABDUL HAMID
TURAHIM ABD. HAMID
ZAHRULLAILI YAHYA
EDITED BY
CHE MAZNAH MAT ISA
APRIL 2009
PREFACE
This document has been prepared mainly for students who are undertaking Final
Year Project as a partial requirement to be awarded as Bachelor of Civil Engineering
(Hons.) at Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM). As part
of this program, final year students are required to carry out their individual
research project known as the Final Year Project (FYP) throughout one final year
(two semesters). This document is designed to guide the students in various stages
especially in exploring the issue, organizing the work, conducting experimental
work and field work, thesis writing and finally writing technical paper.
This manual can also be used for postgraduate students, supervisors, panels and
management staffs in managing and conducting research work. Various criteria
such as problem statement, objective, scope, literature review, methodology,
analysis and results are addressed in assessing the FYP students for their
presentations and reports. Students and supervisors are encouraged to follow one
year project calendar in planning and conducting research activities.
In order to ensure that all the planned activities work efficiently and according to
time frame, a set of forms are attached at the back of this manual for perusal of
students, supervisors, examiners and technicians. These forms are ranging from
proposing research title or scope, booking and registering of the topic, logbook as a
mean of monitoring, booking facilities, evaluation from supervisors, panels and also
purchasing of consumable items are provided.
Hence, students, supervisors, academia and supporting staffs are advised to read
and understand this guidelines/manual before conducting any student research
project. A briefing on the procedure and implementation of Final Year Project will
be conducted at first week of every semester. Students are advised to attend the
talk.
Finally, the authors would like to thank PM Dr Khafilah Din, Siti Rashidah Mohd
Nasir, Md Rasul Mohammad Nor, Haryati Awang and Norliyati Mohd Amin on their
effort to produce a useful document for students, supervisors, lecturers and
supporting staffs in this faculty in achieving good quality of final year students
project.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PREFACE TO SECOND EDITION
TABLE OF CONTENTS
LIST OF FIGURES
LIST OF TABLES
1
2
4
5
CHAPTER ONE:
PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION
1.1
Introduction
1.2
Project Organization
1.2.1 Academic Board FKA
1.2.2 Advisory Committee
1.2.3 Project Coordinator
1.2.4 Project Supervisor
1.2.5 Panels of Presentation
1.2.6 Final Year Project Student
1.2.7 Administrative Staff
1.2.8 Laboratory Staff
7
8
8
9
9
10
11
11
11
1.3
Project Calendar
12
1.4
Credit Hours
12
1.5
Project Evaluation
14
1.6
14
1.7
17
1.8
17
19
19
1.9
Research Ethics
19
1.10
Forms
22
1.11
23
CHAPTER TWO:
25
2.1
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
26
26
26
2.2
26
26
37
38
2.3
Editorial Service
38
2.4
Progress Report
38
2.5
Oral Presentation
38
2.5
39
CHAPTER THREE:
41
3.1
41
3.2
Abstract
41
3.3
Introduction
41
3.4
Headings
41
3.4.1 Sub-heading
41
3.5
Figures
42
3.6
3.7
3.8
Tables
References Citation and Listing
Conclusion
CHAPTER FOUR: FORMAT FOR POSTER PRESENTATION
Sample of Poster
FORMS
Topic Registration -FKAUiTM / FYP/ 2006 (Bil. 1)
Booking Form - FKAUiTM / FYP/ 2006 (Bil. 2)
Registration Form-FKAUiTM / FYP/ 2006 (Bil. 3)
Lab and Computer Lab Registration Form -FKAUiTM / FYP/ 2006 (Bil. 4)
Meeting Document -FKAUiTM / FYP/ 2006 (Bil. 5)
Submission Form (ECW 511/ KJC 527)-FKAUiTM / FYP/ 2006 (Bil. 6)
Evaluation Form ECW 511/ KJC 527(Supervisor)- FKAUiTM / FYP/
42
43
43
44
45
2006 (Bil. 7)
Evaluation Form ECW 511/ KJC 527 (Panel I )- FKAUiTM / FYP/ 2006
(Bil. 8)
Evaluation Form ECW 511/ KJC 527 (Panel II)- FKAUiTM / FYP/ 2006
(Bil.9)
Evaluation Form ECW 512/ KJC 537 (Panel I )- FKAUiTM / FYP/ 2006
(Bil.13)
Evaluation Form ECW 512/ KJC 537 (Panel II)- FKAUiTM / FYP/ 2006
(Bil.14)
LIST OF FIGURES
Figures
Descriptions
Page
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
2.5
2.6
2.7
2.8
2.9
2.10
2.11
2.12
2.13
2.14
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
Figure 3.6
Figure 3.7
8
10
18
21
27
28
29
30
30
31
32
32
33
33
34
35
35
36
42
50
51
52
53
54
55
LIST OF TABLES
Table
Table 1.1
Table 1.2
Table 1.3
Table 1.4
Table 2.1
Table 3.1
Descriptions
Activities of Final Year Project Students
Project Calendar
Project Evaluation for KJC 527 (Supervisor and Panels)
Project Evaluation for KJC 537 (Supervisor and Panels)
The role of potentiometers in a multi-panel precast wall
system
HAZUS damage states and the probability of occurrences
Page
7
13
15
16
36
43
CHAPTER ONE
PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION
1.1
INTRODUCTION
The final year project (FYP) manual is designed to guide the undergraduate
students in conducting their research/project before submitting to Faculty of Civil
Engineering, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM). This report is a partial requirement
in awarding the Bachelor in Engineering (Hons.)(Civil). This manual is intended to
give students the exposure how to conduct research, technical and report writing
within the standard requirements which had been practiced by local and
international universities.
Various activities involve in FYP such as planning, executing and documentation of
their outcomes. In conjunction with these activities, the objectives of FYP as
outlined below to achieve a good quality of outcomes:
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
f)
g)
h)
The FYP is conducted in the last three semesters of the students study period i.e.
in semester 6(course code: ECW 501/KJC 517), semester 7 (course code: ECW
511/ KJC 527) and semester 8 (course code: ECW 521/ KJC 537). The students
are expected to finish their research proposal at the end semester 6. They must
frequently meet the supervisors asking about the topics and make the clarification
on problem statement, scope of research and past literature review.
In semester 7, the students must start their research work by conducting
experimental work, field works, prepare questionnaires and data collection. At the
beginning of semester 8, the students should make analysis on the data obtained
and prepare the final version of project report. On top of this, they also required to
prepare the technical paper similar to journal format. Finally, the students need to
present their output in front of two panels. This is to train the students in
expounding statements of facts and defend such statement in front of audiences. It
is a good practice for the students to pursue their career as civil engineering in the
future.
Supervisors are advised to ascertain the standard and quality of the projects
carried out by their students. Supervisors will assess the progress of project and
the two panels/examiners will be appointed by the Final Year Coordinator to
evaluate the report and presentation of the students. The activities, duration, credit
hours and mode of assessment in executing FYP courses which include ECW
501/KJC 517, ECW 511/KJC 527 and ECW 521/ KJC 537 are shown in Table 1.1.
Duration
Credit
Hours
Mode of
Assessment
Examiner
Report
Bindings
6 months
(Sem.6)
Presentation
of research
proposal
Lecturers
Spiral
binding
6 months
(Sem.7)
0.0
Presentation
on progress
report
Supervisor and
panels
Spiral
Binding
6 months
6.0
Poster
Super-
Spiral
- Data Analysis
- Interpretation of
Results
- Report Writing
- Poster Presentation
- Submission of Report
1.2
(Sem.8)
presentation
visor and
panels (2
from
Faculty
and 2
from
Industry)
Binding
PROJECT ORGANIZATION
The flow chart for the final year project organization is shown in Figure 1.1. It is
signified the communication hierarchy of various parties involved in the execution
of FYP. The people who are involved in this hierarchy are Deputy Dean of
Academic, supervisors, project coordinator, panels, laboratory staffs, administrative
staffs and students. Students are advised to communicate with their supervisors
on the topic and how to conduct the experimental work either in laboratory or on
site.
ACADEMIC BOARD
FACULTY OF CIVIL ENGINEERING
EXAMINER
SUPERVISOR
PROJECT
COORDINATOR
LABORATORY
STAFF
ADVISORY
COMMITTEE
STUDENTS
ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF
f)
g)
1.2.3
Project Coordinator
Give briefing to the final year students on the implementation of FYP at first
week of every semester.
Collect titles and scope of project from supervisors.
Display project titles for students to choose based on their area of interest.
Distribute research projects among supervisors and ensuring that the topics
are equally distributed amongst division.
Collect topic registration, project registration, submission and evaluation
forms from students and supervisors.
Update data base on FYP topics (record all completed FYP).
Prepare a schedule together with panels for student project presentation.
Manage and organize the facilities for day of presentation.
i)
j)
1.2.4
Project Supervisor
The faculty members who are going to supervise FYP student must at least
graduated with Master Degree and he/she should become a main supervisor.
Faculty members on study leave can supervise FYP students as co-supervisors with
Deans endorsement after obtaining approvals from both Deputy Dean (Academic)
and Deputy Dean (Resource) according to flow chart shown in Figure 1.2. Faculty
members without Master Degree are encouraged to supervise FYP students as cosupervisors only. The project supervisors are given the trust and duty to guide the
students upon the completion of FYP.
The role and responsibilities of project supervisors are as listed below:
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
f)
h)
i)
j)
k)
l)
m)
All final year undergraduate students are mandatory to take FYP as a partial
fulfillment in awarding Bachelor Degree in Civil Engineering. Their responsibilities
are as listed below:
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
f)
g)
h)
i)
j)
k)
l)
m)
1.2.7
Administrative Staff
1.2.8
Laboratory Staff
a)
b)
c)
1.3
PROJECT CALENDAR
Each student must follow closely the activities and date stated in Table 1.2. This
table shows duration in weeks for semester 06, 07 and 08 together with action
which should be taken by the students. Students are advised to fill-in all the forms
as stated in the Table 1.2 for documentation and data base purposes. Project
Calendar is essential to final year students upon the successful and completion of
project.
1.4
CREDIT HOURS
Semester 07
CODE
COURSE
HOURS/WEEK
CREDIT HOURS
GRADE
PREREQUISITE
PASSING MARK
* Forty percent (40%) of the marks in this code will be given by supervisor based on
students progress work, written research proposal and content of the study.
Another sixty percent (60%) marks will be assessed from report writing,
presentation and communication skills evaluated by two panels from the faculty.
(Quote: From Syllabus KJC 527 and ECW 511).
Semester 08
CODE
COURSE
HOURS/WEEK
CREDIT HOURS
GRADE
PRE-REQUISITE
**Thirty percent (30%) is accumulated from ECW 511/ KJC 527 assessment, and
another seventy percent (70%) comes from ECW 521/ KJC 537 which consists
report writing, oral presentation, contents of research, discussion (questions and
Note:
Supervisors and panels must submit the marks of ECW 511/ KJC 527 to Project
Coordinator immediately after student presentation. These marks will be recorded and
carried over into the next semester as 30% of the mark for ECW 521/ KJC 537. Two panels
from the faculty will give a total mark of 50%, supervisor will contribute 30% based on the
report while two panels from the industry will contribute a total of 20% for ECW ECW 521/
KJC 537.
Total final mark of FYP in ECW 521/ KJC 537 is calculated below:
30% from ECW 511/ KJC 527 + 70% from ECW 521/ KJC 537
SEM 6
SEMESTER 7
SEMESTER 8
18***week
17***week
16***week
week 15**
week 14
week 13
week 12
week 11
week 10
week 9
week 8
week 7*
week 6
week 5
week 4
week 3
week 2
week 1
Activities
Supervisor/Student submits topics
(FKAUiTM/FYP/2006(Bil.1))
Actions
Supervisor/Student-->Coordinator
Coordinator--> Student
Coordinator--> Student
Briefing on FYP
Due date for submission of proposal to supervisor for
evaluation
Coordinator--> Student&Supervisor
Student&Supervisor-->Lab Staff
Presentation Week
Marks for KJC 527/ECW
511(FKAUiTM/FYP/2006(Bil.7, Bil.8 & Bil.9))
Student,Supervisor&Examiners
Supervisor&Examiners -->
Coordinator
Coordinator
Amendments of topic(FKAUiTM/FYP/2006(Bil.15))
Student(Supervisor)-->Coordinator
Student&Supervisor-->Lab Staff
Presentation Week
Submission of Corrected
Report(FKAUiTM/FYP/2006(Bil.17))
Marks for KJC 537/ECW
521(FKAUiTM/FYP/2006(Bil.12, Bil.13 & Bil.14))
Student,Supervisor&Examiners
Coordinator
*Mid Term Break, **Study Leave, ***Examination Week are subjected to changes
Week 1 begins during registration week of students into UiTM and
FKA
Student(Supervisor) -->Coordinator
Supervisor& Examiners -->
Coordinator
1.5
PROJECT EVALUATION
The appraisal of final year project (ECW 511/ KJC 527 & ECW 521/KJC 537) will
be based on research proposal, progress work, presentation and report writing.
Each candidate must submit their report on thirteen week and presentation will be
performed on fourteen week. If the students did not present, they are required to
complete it next semester even though they were already submitted the report.
The breakdown marks for the evaluation of ECW 511/ KJC 527 by supervisor and
two panels are illustrated in Table 1.3. Supervisor is required to give marks on
research proposal, work progress and report writing which will give the overall
marks of 40%. While the panels should give the total overall marks on presentation
of 60% Furthermore, the two panels do not need to give marks on proposal and
progress work.
Table 1.4 illustrates the distribution marks for supervisor, two panels from the
faculty and two panels from the industry for subject ECW 521/ KJC 537. The
difference with ECW 511/ KJC 527 is that supervisor did not give mark on
research proposal. Supervisors are not required to attend their student
presentation. There will be an additional of two (2) panels selected from the
industry to assess the soft skills of the students (communication/presentation
skills). The marks will be given based on progress work and report writing, which
gives an overall mark of 30%. Subsequently, both panels from the faculty should
give marks on report writing of 50%, while the panels from the industry will give
marks on the poster presentation of another 20%
1.6
b)
c)
d)
Supervisor must provide sufficient topics for the students. The topics
must be related to Civil Engineering studies/works and the scope
should be suitable for Undergraduate Level in fulfilling the partial
requirement of Final Year Project (FYP).
Supervisor must submit five proposed topics to Project Coordinator at
beginning of the semester. Students are also encouraged to propose
their own topics/scope of research to Project Coordinator if they have
any according to the project calendar i.e. the sixth week of semester
06 or earlier. These topics will be counted as two contact hours in
supervisors timetable and yearly assessment. Supervisors who did
not submit research topics will not get any credit.
Project Coordinator should display the list of proposed topics after
mid-term break from the eight to ninth week of semester 06. This
list should not be revealed the supervisors names.
Student must choose and book the listed topic from the Project
Coordinator before examination of semester 06 started, i.e. from
the eight to twelve week.
e)
f)
5%
5%
5%
5%
5%
25%
5%
5%
5%
5%
20%
NA
Introduction
Problem Statement
Scope of Work
Objectives
Literature Review
Gap of Research
Theoretical Background
Methodology
Expected Outcomes
References
Sub Total
D.REPORT WRITING
Introduction
Scope of Work
Objectives
Problem Statement
Literature Review
Gap of Research
Theoretical Background
Methodology
Expected Outcomes
References
Originality/Future Research
5%
5%
5%
5%
5%
5%
5%
5%
5%
5%
5%
Panel 1
Panel 2
NA
NA
NA
NA
Notes:
1. Supervisors have to evaluate student's progress
5%
5%
5%
5%
5%
5%
5%
5%
5%
5%
5%
5%
5%
5%
5%
5%
5%
5%
70%
5%
5%
5%
5%
5%
5%
5%
5%
5%
5%
70%
NA
NA
Sub Total
TOTAL
EVALUATION FOR KJC 527
1. SUPERVISOR MARKS
Mark = (A+B+D)/100 x 40
2. PANEL 1 MARKS
Mark = (C)/70x 30
3. PANEL 2 MARKS
Mark = (C)/70 x 30
TOTAL MARKS FOR KJC
527/ECW511 ****
55%
100%
70%
70%
****Total mark for KJC 527/ECW 511 (passing mark is 50%) =(Supervisor + Panel 1 +
Panel 2)
Supervisor (40%) +
Panels (60%) = 100%
Panel 1
Panel 2
NA
NA
Industry
5%
5%
5%
5%
5%
25%
Industry
5%
5%
5%
5%
5%
25%
Faculty
5%
5%
5%
5%
5%
5%
5%
5%
5%
5%
5%
5%
60%
Faculty
5%
5%
5%
5%
5%
5%
5%
5%
5%
5%
5%
5%
60%
5%
5%
5%
5%
20%
NA
5%
5%
5%
5%
5%
5%
5%
5%
5%
5%
5%
5%
60%
Notes:
1. Supervisors have to evaluate student's report for
KJC 537/ ECW 521 using form
FKAUiTM/FYP/2003(Bil 13)
2. Examiners have to evaluate student's report for
KJC 537/ ECW 521 using form
FKAUiTM/FYP/2003(Bil 14) and
FKAUiTM/FYP/2003(Bil. 9) .
3. Main supervisor is advised to discuss with cosupervisor regarding total mark on their parts.
g)
h)
i)
j)
Project Coordinator should record all previous topics that have been
registered in data base or using spreadsheet which could be accessed
by students/lecturers/coordinator to avoid any similarity of topics.
Students are encouraged to confer with Project Coordinator or
supervisor if they have problem with the topics or scope of works.
Any changes/amendments of topics must be informed to the Project
Coordinator one month before project presentation of semester 08.
If students cannot complete the project on time, they are required to
fill-in incomplete FYP forms on eleventh week of semester 08.
Note: All the events as mentioned above should refer to FYP calendar tabulated in
Table 1.1 of this manual.
1.7
An effective time management and well planning are the key factors for the
completion and successful of the project. All the activities and time durations
involved in the project should be scheduled using Gantt chart. All students are
required to prepare this type of chart for one year duration in their research
proposal and must be endorsed by their supervisors.
In monitoring process, each student is required to keep proper logbook
documentation so that he/she can record any work done on weekly basis. The
logbook must follow the format as given in meeting document form
FKAUiTM/FYP/2006(Bil. 5). Supervisor is required to comment on the students
work progress in the logbook. Weekly meeting between student and supervisor is
very important for monitoring purposes. Students in ECW 511/ KJC 527 must
submit their research proposal at the fifth week of each semester to their
supervisor for reviewing purposes. This will give the supervisor an ample time for
justification of scope either it is sufficient, too broad or narrow.
Final year project student who have register for ECW 511/ KJC 527 followed by
ECW 521/ KJC 537 for the following semester. Both subjects are required to
submit the progress report and final report accordingly to the faculty for
assessment. They must also attached logbook together with reports on the fourteen
week of corresponding semester. The logbook will act as an evident, in case any
dispute arose between supervisor and student.
The progress report (ECW 511/ KJC 527) should contain problem statement,
objectives,
scope of work,
literature
review,
theoretical
background,
preliminary/pilot/try run data, methodology and expected outcomes. The final
report (ECW 521/ KJC 537) should contain progress report, primary data, data
analysis, discussion, conclusion and recommendation. These documents must be
submitted one week before presentation for the panels to access the report. Figure
1.3 shows the procedure in implementing final year project with specific forms to be
filled in by the students. The students are advised to follow closely the flow chart
given so that they can accomplish FYP on time without delaying it with flying
colors.
1.8
Students who wish to proceed with the research can claim from the following
budget with the approval of their supervisors.
AMENDMENT OF TOPIC
(FKAUiTM/FYP/2006/Bil.15)
3.
Faculty budget is given to students who are not funded by any sponsors e.g.
PTPTN, MARA, Yayasan Negeri and others.
Any claim to bursar must provide an original receipt as a proof of purchase
and endorsement are required from Supervisor and Deputy Dean
(Resource) or the Dean.
Consumable items can be purchased under laboratory budget; these items
can be used by final year report student and teaching staff.
b)
Student can claim directly from their supervisor under IRPA or IRDC
research project to buy any specific materials, equipment and tools.
However, approval of claim will be granted at the discretion of the respective
supervisor.
Expenses for expensive instruments and machineries can be ordered under
yearly budget plan or can be inclusive in the research grant of the respective
supervisor. Subsequently, supervisor is encouraged to plan and anticipated
in yearly budget for his/her division.
Figure 1.4 shows the procedure of purchasing new materials or equipment for
his/her division based on the availability of budget. The supervisors and lecturers
are encouraged to buy the instruments and equipment based on his/her area of
specialization.
1.9
RESEARCH ETHICS
Research ethic in final year project content is to guide the students in pursuing and
continuing their research in an acceptable manner and attitude. Following are the
meaning of ethics and research.
Ethics mean:
Research mean:
i.
ii.
iii.
iv.
v.
vi.
vii.
b).
Style Manual and Guide to Scholarly Publishing. 2nd ed, New York: MLA,
1998: 151)
When writing research paper, report, web page, or other products, resources
from others publication may be used but must be credited to the person
who had done it before. If the students did not do the citation or credited to
the original authors, it is committed plagiarism which considered unethical
and a serious infraction of the student codes of virtually to universities.
Unfortunately, many students commit plagiarism unintentionally and they
were told frequently to do citation in proper way by supervisors. It is a form
of theft and is certainly regarded as a serious offence in educational
systems.
If the author wants to reproduce the text or ideas from other sources,
he/she must obtain a written permission from the copyright holder and
probably require to affix a copyright notice from the previous author.
Plagiarism can be detected when there are insufficient references and
acknowledgement direct copying of paragraphs, sentences, ideas, pictures,
concepts and statistical tables from sources such as journals, textbooks,
magazines, internet and others.
The flow of sentences will become discontinuous and did not synchronize
with previous and later sentences.
The readers will find difficulties in understanding the texts because most of
the sentences are cut and paste of statements from other multiple sources.
Students are encourage to construct their own words and sentences based
on their understanding after reading sources such as internet, journals,
textbooks, lecture notes and others.
Being friendly
Being Responsible
i.
ii.
d).
Being meticulous
i.
ii.
iii.
iv.
v.
vi.
vii.
Semester 7
Confirmation of the availability of material
and equipment by Supervisor with each lab. staff
If available
Supervisor arrange with
Laboratory staff
If not available
Supervisor arrange the budget for the special
material and equipment following to the either of
the budget describe in section 8.1 to 8.2
Project Registration
student to collect Laboratory Registration Form
If material available
Student may proceed
Laboratory Staff is advised to use the faculty Over Time form with
additional endorsement from the respective Supervisor.
e).
i.
ii.
f).
Being fair
i.
ii.
1.10 FORMS
Project Coordinator will keep the list of research topics in data base. All supervisors
are advised to submit project title or scope of research to the Project Coordinator
using form FKAUiTM/FYP/2006 (Bil. 1) (Topic Registration Form). As mentioned
earlier, each supervisor must propose a minimum of five topics to Project
Coordinator.
Each student shall book a topic before he/she can register for that particular topic.
They can book the topic as first come first serve basis and have to submit the form
FKAUiTM/FYP/2006 (Bil. 2) to the main office. The student also has to keep their
copy for the registration purposes. For project registration the student has to
submit form FKAUiTM/FYP/2006 (Bil. 3) to Project Coordinator. Amendments of
topic can be made with the knowledge of supervisor using form
FKAUiTM/FYP/2006 (Bil. 15).
The progress report (ECW 511/ KJC 527) and final report (ECW 512/ KJC 537)
have to be submitted together with the submission form, FKAUiTM/FYP/2006
(Bil. 6) and FKAUiTM/FYP/2006 (Bil. 11), respectively.
ECW 521/KJC 537s student is required to submit the corrected final report
together with form FKAUiTM/FYP/2006 (Bil. 17).
It is important to remind that the students are required to use the original forms.
The photocopy form is invalid to use, subsequently disqualify the students to
register, present and submit their final year project reports.
CO1:
CO2:
CO3:
CO4:
The course outcomes for Final Year Project II (ECW 521/KJC 537) are as follows:
CO1: Implement the research design/methodology of a given topic.
CO2: Systematically collect, analyzed and select suitable method of presenting the
data.
CO3: Interpret, discuss and draw conclusion from the analyzed data.
CO4: Write, present and defend the final research report.
The learning outcomes for final year project students are as follows:
1. The ability of student to formulate problem statement, research objectives
and research design.
2. The ability of student in enhancing her/his critical thinking.
3. The ability of student to present and defend research findings.
4. The ability of student to write final report, technical paper and presentation.
The program outcomes which addresses the course outcomes of ECW 511/KJC
527 and ECW 521/KJC 537 are PO2, PO3, PO7, PO8 and PO10. The CO-PO matrix
is developed based on the course outcomes and program outcomes for these
subjects. From CO-PO matrix, performance criteria are assessed according to the
students abilities to achieve the standard which categorized using the domain as
specified in bloom taxonomy. The direct instrument such as report writing,
research proposal, technical paper and meeting documents are used to evaluate the
students performance. Finally, the grades of students are given into five ranges
which are bad, poor, mediocre, good and outstanding.
Students are required to meet with supervisor every week and meeting documents
must be signed by supervisor to indicate that they already fulfill attendance sheets
and progress work. Students are also advised to record the work in log book and
schedule properly the activities using Gantt Chart. The comparison can be made
between the actual work done and the planned activities so that students will know
whether they are ahead of schedule or behind schedule.
The overall assessment of final year project can be conducted based on research
proposal, final report, technical paper and presentation. At the end of each course,
students are required to present their work in front of two panels. Prior to final
submission, students are required to submit their report to the supervisors to
check for contents, flow of sentences, organization and presentation of final thesis.
Panels will assess the students report and presentation based on contents,
communication skills, presentation skills, discussion (Question and Answer),
objectives, scope of work, problem statement, literature review, methodology, data
CHAPTER TWO
REPORT WRITING FORMAT
2.1
0
2.1.2 Typing and Printing Use word processors for typing and
print using letter quality preferably on a laser printer.
2.1.3 Typeface, Typing Quality and Font Size The entire text
Top edge:
2.0cm
Right Side:
2.0cm
Left Side:
2.5cm
Bottom edge:
2.0cm
All information such as text heading, illustration, footnotes and page
numbers must be within the text area.
2.1.7 Pagination throughout the report, the text, reference and appendix
pages should be numbered consecutively in Arabic Numerals (1, 2, 3,
4, 5, ..) including pages for tables, figures and appendices.
2.1.8 Tables and Figures Tables and figures must be centred within the
2.1.9 Paper and Duplication Use quality plain white simile paper (80
gm) of A4 size for all copies of the report. Print text or illustrations
only on one side of each sheet. Only the original copy is acceptable.
2.2
The report must comprise of three divisions which are preliminary, text or
main body (chapters, sections and parts) and references. The details
description of this division will be explained implicitly in what follows:
2.2.1 The Preliminary The format for preliminary section should follow
the arrangement as listed below. The samples together with the
margin of each page are shown in the following figures.
0
Cover of report (see Figure 2.1)
1
Title page (see Figure 2.2)
2
Declaration (see Figure 2.3)
3
Acknowledgement (see Figure 2.4)
4
Abstract (see Figure 2.5)
5
List of Content (see Figure 2.6)
6
List of Figures (see Figure 2.7)
7
List of Tables (see Figure 2.8)
8
Abbreviations / Symbols (see Figure 2.9)
9
Main text/body (Chapters) (see Figure 2.10 & 2.11)
10
References (see Figure 2.11)
11
Appendices (see Figure 2.12)
25 mm
25 mm
B. Eng (Hons)
MARINE EFFECT ON
CONCRETE STRUCTURES
(capital and centred)
April 2004
25 mm
Cover
Spine
MARINE EFFECTS ON
CONCRETE STRUCTURES
By
1 space
2 spaces
15 mm
Title Page
a) Title of Report should describe the content of the report and omitting
words such as An Investigation, An Analysis, A Study of.
b) Full Name of Author
c) The degree for which the report is submitted
d) Universiti Teknologi Mara
e) The month and year in which the report is submitted for examination
5 spaces
I (write down the candidates name, UiTM no.) confirm that the work in this
report is my own work and the appropriate credit has been given where
references have been made to the work of other researchers.
2 spaces
:_____________
:_____________
:_____________
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
..
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
ABSTRACT
Concrete structures deteriorate for various reasons and upgrading has been
achieved for over 20 years by bonding steel plates using epoxy resins.
Disadvantages of this method include transporting, handling and installing
heavy plates and corrosion of the plates. The rehabilitation.. (12-point
font)
ABSTRACT
a) An abstract must be stated. The abstract is a digest of the entire report
and should be given careful attention as the main text.
b) The abstract should give a brief exposition of the research problems,
purposes of the study, scope of study, research approach and limitation.
A summary of the finding in the context of the whole study is also
required.
c) The abstract should be placed immediately before the first chapter of the
report.
d) It should be typed single spacing on one single sheet only (not more than
300 words)
e) Paragraph when necessary.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
i
ii
iii
vii
viii
xii
ABSTRACT
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
LIST OF TABLES
LIST OF FIGURES
LIST OF SYMBOLS
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1
2
6
7
9
10
Introduction
Design Concepts of Precast Wall Panels
Theoretical Response of A Single Rocking Precast Hollow Core
Wall
11
14
16
List of Contents
a)
The titles of parts, sections or chapters and their principal, and their
principal subdivisions should be listed in the Table of Contents and
must be worded exactly as they appear in the body of the report.
c) Major headings and sub-headings are typed flushed with the left
margin.
d)
LIST OF FIGURES
Descriptions
Page
Figure 1.1
53
Figure 1.2
54
Figure 1.3
55
Figure 1.4
56
Figure 1.5
57
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1.1
Descriptions
Modification of the damping factor, B used in the
current codes
Page
48
49
Table 1.3
50
Table 1.4
51
Table 1.5
49
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
wall width
Cc
Cd
CcDBE
CcMCE
DBE
DS
Damage State
ep
CHAPTER 3
3.1
3.2
Experimental Setup and Results (this is another main heading, bold and
left-aligned)
Two specimens were tested on shaking table under dynamic response. Figure
3.1 shows the experimental setup together with instrumentation used in
measuring strain of energy dissipator and lateral displacement of wall.
3.2.1 Visual observation on Specimen 1(this is the sub-heading, bold, leftaligned, there should be a minimum of two-subheading to justify having subheadings)
1
M / EI g I re e
e
e
(2-1)
The written equations shall be centred with one blank line above and below
to separate them from text. If possible, equations shall be written by
equation generator or MS WORD program with 11 point letters. They should
be numbered with chapter number follow by consecutively with number
right justified, and the equation is referred by these numbers.
Writing References
1.
2.
Axially
3.
4.
For more than 2 authors, e.g. Talib, S.A and Baharom, B.B, Din,K.B, and
Hamzah, S.H., (2003) should be cited in the text as; Talib et al., (2003)
LIST OF APPENDICES
Page
Appendix A
A-1
A.1
Specimen Modeling
A.2
A.3
Appendix B
A-1
A-2
A-4
B-1
B.1
Strut-and-Tie Modeling
B-1
B.2
B-3
B.3
B-6
Appendix C
C-1
C.1
C-1
C.2
C-4
C.3
C-6
Sample of Figure
Sample of Table
Type of
potentiometers
Linear
Functions
To measure the sliding or horizontal
movement
P31,P33, P5
Linear
P2,P3,P4,P21,P24,P25
Rotary
P32,P27,P8,P6
Linear
To measure
seismic wall
P17,P30, P9,P7
Linear
Linear
the
uplift
bottom
2.2.2
2.2.3
Reference Materials
a) Bibliography (or List of References) any citations which make
use of other peoples work, either in direct quotation or reference,
must contain a bibliography listing together with the sources.
b) Illustrations can be in the form of pictures, photographs,
diagrams, graphs, maps, charts and templates. Photographs are
normally listed as PLATES, while the rest are called FIGURES.
Illustrations must be of good quality either colour or blank and white.
They should conform to margin requirements and the page number
typed in the standard position.
c)
Appendices this part contains supplementary illustrative
materials, original data, and quotations too long for inclusion in the
text or not immediately essential to an understanding of the subject
or may break the flow of the writing. This section should be divided
into several sections like Appendix A, Appendix B etc. Each appendix
with its title, if it has one, should be listed separately in the Table of
Contents. Refer to Figure 2.13 for the sample of list of Appendices.
2.3
EDITORIAL SERVICES
It is the responsibility of the candidates to ensure that the report is free from
typo and grammatical error. Consequently, they are suggested to use/employ
professional editors from Language Center. Supervisors are responsible to
check the reports in terms of facts and contents but they also encourage
2.4
PROGRESS REPORT
The candidates are required to plan their activities together with durations
before commencing their research work. It is recommended that the students
must prepare their scheduling in terms of Gantt Chart. Under the code of
ECW 511/KJC 527, the report must contain the Problem Statement,
Objectives of Research, Scope of Work, Significance of Study, Literature
Review together with critical comments and gaps, Research Methodology,
Result of Pilot Study, Expected Outcomes and Work Planning for the
following semester (ECW 521/KJC 537). Supervisor is advised to guide and
monitor the work done by their students. Finally, the candidates are advised
to submit a progress report during semester 7 and final report at the end of
semester according to the project calendar.
2.5
ORAL PRESENTATION
The purpose of oral presentation is to allow the students to present their
work, show their understanding in depth of the subject matter as well as
communication skills. Therefore, each student must attend and present
his/her work in front of two panels which have been appointed by advisory
committee members at the end of the semester. The lists of panels,
supervisors, date, time and venue will be displayed on notice board before
oral presentation. Students must take note the date of submission and
presentation so that they are really well-prepared before presentation. They
must wear proper dress code during presentation. They also are encouraged
to use visual aids such as power point, laser pointer and slides in their
presentation. At the end of presentation, the two panels will ask the question
on any aspect of the project and the students must elaborate or defend
issues arising from their work.
2.6
Q:
A:
The project topics that have been proposed by supervisors between week 13
and 15 of semester 6 according to the academic calendar can be booked by
filling the booking form contains in this manual.
Q:
A:
Yes, they are encouraged to do so but they must discuss and get an approval
from their supervisors before commencing their work.
Q:
A:
The lecturers in the relevant field of expertise will supervise the student
based on the chosen topic.
Q:
A:
Q:
A:
The lecturers must have at least a Master Degree and are not on study leave.
Lecturers on study leave are only allowed to become a co-supervisor.
Q:
A:
Q:
A:
Q:
A:
The students must register the subject ECW 521/KJC 537 directly after they
had completed ECW 511/ KJC 527. This is because subjects ECW 511/ KJC
527 and ECW 521/KJC 537 are a one-year sequence course with two
different codes.
Q:
Can I drop the subject ECW 511/ KJC 527 after I registered?
A:
Yes you can, but must be during the time frame as specified in academic
calendar.
Q:
A:
You are not allowed to do this but you can apply for TL (Tidak Lengkap)
status.
Q:
What should I do if I did not complete ECW 521/ KJC 537 report
due to delay in laboratory work?
A:
Q:
A:
Q:
A:
Q:
A:
4 copies of FYP reports which consist of two soft copies in CD form and 2
hard binding copies must be submitted to faculty after oral presentation. In
the CD, students must include the final year report, power point of the
presentation and technical paper. Each student must write the title of
project, supervisors name, students name and academic year on the cover
of CD.
CHAPTER 3
FORMAT FOR TECHNICAL PAPER
3.1 TITLE OF THE TECHNICAL PAPER
The title must be located at the top page and centered. It should be bolded with font size 16 pt. The
authors names together with affiliations should be formatted as follows:
PAPER TITLE
(16 PT, TIMES NEW ROMAN, BOLD STYLE)
First authors name1, Second authors name2, Third authors name3
(Family name, initials:Hamid, N.H.A) (11pt, Times New Roman, Italic)
1
3.2 ABSTRACT
The abstract should be in Capitalized Bold Times New Roman font, size 11 pt. The abstract text must
be single-lined in font size 11 pt, Times New Roman. It should contain an overview of your research
work together with the outcomes and must be summarized not more than 200 words.
Keywords: Five keywords are to be listed here which is contained in the abstract. The keywords
should be arranged in alphabetical order and use the same format as in the Abstract section above.
3.3 INTRODUCTION
All the technical papers must comply with the following requirement as explained in the
sequence sub-topic to ensure the students followed the standard format, produce a good paper
and upon the completion of the seminar. Non-compliance format will results in reduction of
marks and rejected. Final year project students (ECW 512/ KJC 537) are required to read
through the following instructions before submitting their final manuscript. Articles
submitted for publication in this seminar must be original, unpublished elsewhere and
addressed the interest to the engineering community. The technical content should be
presented in a readable and accessible style.
Articles should be single-spaced, type in Times New Roman font and with size 12 pt. An
article, including tables and figures should be no longer than 12 pages.
The author may be requested to modify the article or to clarify certain points in the article.
Accepted document format is the Microsoft Word 2004 DOC format. Your documents should
have meaningful and unambiguous names.. Submissions of article (soft copy) using CDROM are mandatory for each of the student. The students are required to submit hardcopy
and soft-copy to Faculty of Civil Engineering before presentation.
3.4 HEADINGS
Headings should be in Capitalized Bold Times New Roman font, size 12, numbered using
Arabic numeration.
3.4.1
Sub-Heading
First level Sub-Headings should be in Bold Times New Roman, size 11 and must also be
numbered in Arabic numeration
3.5
FIGURES
All photographs should be of high quality, ready for typesetting. Images should be in
JPG/JPEG format and of a high resolution (300 DPI or better).
Drawn illustrations must be of high quality, as they will be used as is. All figures, tables,
graphs and photographs must be properly captions must be aligned center and presented as
shown in the example below.
WALL 5
WALL 6
T1
T2
WALL 4
WALL 3
WALL 2
WALL 1
T1
ep
ep
ep
Vs Vs
Vs
Vs
Vs
Vs
Vs
Vs
T2
ep
Vs Vs
BW/2
BW/2
BW
BW
V1
BW
V2
C1
BW
V3
C2
BW
BW
V4
C3
V6
C4
C5
3.6 TABLES
C6
Insert a table directly after the paragraph where it is first referred to. Insert table caption
before the table using Times New Roman font, size 11 pt. All tables and their captions must
be aligned center similar to the figure captions mentioned above. Table 3.1 shows an example
of table which will be included in the text. A brief description must be explained in the text.
Table 3.1: HAZUS damage states and the probability of occurrences
Damage HAZUS*
State
Damage
Physical
State
Operational
Condition
Earthquake
1
2
None
Slight
Pre-yield
Tolerable
3
4
Moderate
Heavy
Fully Operational
Immediate
Occupancy
Life Safety
Collapse
Prevention
Collapse
Repairable
Irreparabl
e
5
Complete Global
Instability
*Refer to HAZUS99-SR2 (2004)
3.7
Annual
Probability
100% in 50yrs
50% in 50yrs
Return
Period(yrs
)
63
150
10% in 50yrs
2% in 50yrs
475
2450
0.002
0.0004
0.016
0.007
Include references at the end of the paper in the same format that appears in the
REFERENCES section. List your references accordingly in alphabetical order. The citation
order should appear in the text are as follows (Ariffin et al.(2004); Nakato, T. (1990)).
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION
The HEADERS of the conclusion, acknowledgement and references sections SHOULD NOT
be numbered. Proof read your manuscript before submitting the final version.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Kindly acknowledge the support, help, contribution of individuals, agencies, etc. that you
received and utilized towards completing this work.
REFERENCES
Fintel, M. (1995). "Perfomance of Buildings with Shear Walls in Earthquake in the Last
Thirty Years." PCI Journal, 40(3), 62-80.
Holden, T. J., Restrepo, J., and Mander, J. B. (2003). "Seismic Performance of Precast
Reinforced and Prestressed Concrete Walls." Journal of Structural Engineering,
ASCE(March 2003), pp 286-296.
Kurama, Y. (2001). "Simplified Seismic Design Approach for Friction-Damped Unbonded
Post-Tensioned Precast Concrete Walls." Technical Paper, ACI Structural Journal,
Vol. 98, No.5(September-October 2001), pp705-715.
Liyanage, L. U. (2004). "Biaxial Lateral Loading Behaviour of Thin Concrete Walls," Master
Thesis, University of Canterbury, Cnristchurch.
Lecturer, Faculty of Civil Engineering, UiTM, 40450, Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia
Professor, Civil Engineering Department, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, NZ
ABSTRACT
Two geometrically identical full scales of precast hollow core wall panels are constructed together
with their foundations beam. These walls are tested under bi-lateral loading using various biaxial
displacement controlled such as 2-leaf clover, 4-leaf clover and double 4-leaf clover pattern.
They are designed in accordance to Damage Avoidance Design philosophy to carry wind, roof and
seismic loading. The walls are detailed with steel-armouring at their wall-foundation interface to
provide some damage protection against seismic attack. Moreover, longitudinal prestress strands
wires together with unbonded post-tensioned tendons will allow the walls to rock forward and
backward due to discontinuity between wall and foundation beam. Mechanical energy dissipator,
unbonded fuse-bars and bonded fuse-bars are added to these walls so that the rocking system can
dissipate more energy during ground motion. A shaking table is used in slow motion to perform the
bi-lateral quasi-static experiments for both walls. Wall 1, with a fixed location of bonded fuse-bars
and unbonded tendons, is tested under various biaxial load paths including 4-leaf clover patterns.
Wall 2 is tested with different configurations by utilizing unbonded post-tensioned tendons, unbonded
fuse-bars and mechanical energy dissipator under double 4-leaf clover pattern. Experimental results
show that due to the damage avoidance design details both walls perform very well under biaxial load
paths without any discernable structural damage up to 2.0% drift. Visual observation also proved that
precast hollow core wall does not experience any cracks or spalling of concrete as compared to fixedbase monolithic wall panels and slender walls. Thus, precast hollow core wall panels are
recommended to use in the construction of warehouse/industrial buildings especially in prone seismic
regions.
Keyword: displacement compatibility, earthquake excitation, shaking table, strut-and-tie model,
shear-buckling.
1.0
INTRODUCTION
In seismic regions, wall panels are expected to resist in-plane seismic forces where lateral
resisting load is provided by wall panels in both directions. These walls often perform a dual
function in providing the exterior cladding as well as resisting loads. The loads may arise
from the combination of roof (gravity), in-plane and out-of-plane wind and/or seismic
loadings. These lateral loads must be resisted by special wall known as seismic wall. Figure
1(a) presents the conceptual design of a prototype building where it is envisaged precast
hollow core wall units as the principal structural and cladding elements. Plan view of the
conceptual prototype structure used in this study is shown in Figure 1(b). The seismic walls
carry gravity, seismic and wind loads from the roof where rafters are seated on top of these
structural elements. The non-seismic walls are principally designed to act as cladding. The
infill wall units are only required to sustain their self_weight and wind face_loads. Resistance
of lateral wind and seismic forces is via a longitudinal wind truss system that acts through a
roof diaphragm. Figure 1(c) shows front elevation of 1200mm wide wall units that are held in
position by an inverted channel which also as edge chord of the wind truss. This continuous
steel channel is also used to seat the rafters and anchor the vertical post-tensioned prestress
and unbonded fuse-bars.
Thus, this research seeks to design, construct and test a subassembly seismic wall under
bi-lateral loading. The seismic wall is designed and detailed according to Damage
Avoidance Design (DAD) principles as proposed by Mander and Cheng (1997) where the
bottom of the wall is protected with steel-armouring. A couple of unbonded post-tensioned
tendons in each wall are used to provide a self-centring for rocking system without forming
any residual displacement. In addition, mechanical energy disspator, bonded and unbonded
fuse-bars are also fully-utilized in this design to achieve the maximum efficiency of energy
dissipation.
2.0
From past earthquake such as the 1964 Alaska earthquake (Berg and Stratta,1964), the
Armenia earthquake (Wyllie and Filson, 1989), the1994 Northridge earthquake (Iverson and
Hawkins, 1994), the 1999 Koceali (Turkey) earthquake (Youd et al., 2000) and the 2001 Bhuj
(India) earthquake (Ghosh, 2001) showed that precast concrete wall buildings did not
perform very wellparticularly at connections and junctions with other structural
components. Although many buildings did perform sufficiently well so that life-safety was
preserved, substantial damage to the walls in many buildings lead to loss of amenity
including major business interruption.
A lot of research had been conducted dealing with precast wall panels under reverse quasistatic cyclic loading. For example, McMenamin (1999) tested five precast walls with 4/10scale under in-plane seismic loading. Results revealed that these walls failed by shearbuckling and fracture of reinforcement bars leading to cracking and spalling of concrete.
Further investigation was carry out by Chiewanichakorn (1999) to solve this problem by
using four precast walls with variation of axial loading and length of lap-splices. He also
demonstrated that these walls could perform better with starter bars clustered at edges of the
wall as compare to those walls with uniform spacing of the longitudinal reinforcement
through the entire length of the wall. In order to validate the experimental work performed by
McMenamin (1999) and Chiewanichakorn (1999), a global computational model which can
predict the possible failure mechanism of reinforced concrete wall was further investigated by
Lander (2001). He modelled these failure mechanism using displacement compatibility and
force-equilibrium in the form of strut-and-tie model. The analytical modelling developed by
Lander (2001) showed a good agreement with McMenamins and Chiewanichakorns
experimental results.
On-line with this research matter, Holden et. al, (2003) studied the seismic performance of
two half-scaled precast concrete walls tested under reversed quasi-static static regime. The
first wall is designed according to requirements of the New Zealand Concrete Structures
Standard (NZS 3101) as fixed-based monolithic emulation precast concrete wall, while the
second wall designed as a rocking-base connection using Damage Avoidance Design (DAD).
This design philosophy was proposed by Mander and Cheng (1997) where a steel-steel
rocking interface protects (or armour) point forces to prevent any local damage propagating
into the concrete structures. Both walls had a height to thickness ratio of 30:1 and
reinforcement ratios of 0.84% and 0.25% in the longitudinal and transverse direction,
respectively. The first wall performed as a ductile cast-in-place unit with a degradation of
strength was observed when it reached 2.5% drift. But second wall performed better than the
first wall without any structural damage. Hence, this research extends the DAD work of
Holden et al.(2003) who demonstrated that good seismic performance of precast wall
systems can be achieved by avoiding the formation of a plastic hinge at the bottom of the
wall through disconnecting the wall-foundation interface and clamping the precast wall unit
to the foundation using post-tensioned unbonded tendons.
3.0
Two specimens consisted of precast hollow core wall and foundation beam were designed
according to Damage Avoidance Design Philosophy and constructed in the laboratory. Figure
2 presents cross-section of two specimens including reinforcement bars, location of energy
dissipators and unbonded tendons. Also shown is the mix of prestress unbonded tendons,
mechanical dissipating devices, bonded and unbonded fuse-bars investigated. Wall 1 was
designed with a pair of bonded fuse-bars (Type A) and Wall 2 was designed with two
replaceable energy dissipators which are unbonded fuse-bars (Type B) and mechanical energy
dissipator (Type C). Steel channel was inserted into bottom of wall panels as damage
protection against earthquake impact. Steel plate placed at top of foundation beam to allow
rocking mechanism under earthquake excitation. A concrete block weighed 34kN was
constructed separately to simulate the gravity loads which comes from roof loading. Figure
2(a) shows details of reinforcement bars in the foundation beam and the cross-section of each
wall together with unbonded tendons (RB25). Figure 2(b) exhibits a special fitting for
installation of mechanical energy dissipators (Type C) made from steel block with a hole at
the center. Figure 2 (c) shows the location of bonded fuse-bars (Type A) at the two-middle
void sections together with unbonded tendons of Wall 1. Figure 2(d) presents Wall 2 with two
combinations of two types of energy dissipators with unbonded tendons. The first
combinations is unbonded fuse-bars (Type B) and unbonded tendons whilst second
combination is mechanical energy dissipators (Type C) and unbonded tendons. After the
construction of these specimens, both of the walls were placed on shaking table and
instrumentation took place before testing.
4.0
5.0
Figure 4 presents the overall experimental and theoretical results of seismic bi-lateral
performance of Wall 1 at 1.5% drift amplitude under the 4-leaf clover displacement
controlled pattern. The location of unbonded tendons (RB25), 16mm diameter and 260mm
length of bonded fuse-bars (Type A), foundation beam and top concrete block of Wall 1 are
presented herein. Figure 4(a) presents the experimental 4-leaf clover displacement
controlled pattern used to provide bi-lateral loading. This pattern was chosen to examine the
extreme seismic behaviour when the out-of-plane loading reached maximum drift while zero
drift at in-plane directions or vice-versa. Figure 4(b) presents the in-plane force-displacement
response to the applied displacements, while Figure 4(c) presents the theoretical behaviour
assuming rigid body kinematics. Although the experimental and theoretical force capacities
are in good agreement at large displacements (> 25mm), it is evident that the initial
stiffnesses do not compare well. Figure 4(d) presents the experimental and theoretical results
for out-of-plane behaviour.
The theoretical results show that an elastic response is expected for out-of-plane direction,
but considerable non-linear is evident. It should be noted, however, that the out-of-plane
forces are only some 10% of the in-plane forces, and the energy absorbed is attributed to
friction in the fittings of the experimental apparatus. Figure 4(e) and (f) show a similar
pattern as the predicted with flat plateau when bonded fuse-bars exceeding yielding strength.
Similar results were also obtained in-plane and out-of-plane load path except that in-plane
load path remains constant at +1.5% drift even though further increment of in-plane
displacement took place. This is because the bonded fuse-bars had already yield of at 1.0%
drift and then reached a maximum plateau at 1.5% drift. It was observed that Wall 1 did not
experience cracking and damage through the entire experiment. Both of unbonded fuse-bars
were yielded and leaving a gap of 3mm between wall-foundation interface.
6.0
Figure 5 presents the experimental and theoretical results of Wall 2 which had a pair of
unbonded tendons together with a pair of unbonded fuse-bars. The specimen was tested at
four drift levels (0.1%, 0.5%, 1.0% and 1.5%) using the double 4-leaf clover
displacement controlled pattern as shown in Figure 5(a). The unbonded fuse-bars were
prestressed to 50% of their yield capacity. For the lower drift amplitude (0.1%, 0.5% and
1.0%) the wall remained mostly elastic, whereas a nonlinear flag-shape behaviour
occurred at 1.5% drift amplitudes when the main tendons yielded. For the latter, the
unbonded tendon remained in elastic region but the fuse-bars yielded and dissipated most of
their energy as shown in Figure 5(b). Figure 5(c) shows the theoretical in-plane behaviour
where the flag-shape is slightly bigger than experimental results due to higher stiffness in
unbonded tendons and unbonded fuse-bar.
Under biaxial loading testing, some of the lateral loading lost due to friction in the actuator
and connections. Out-of-plane, the wall behaved in a mostly elastic fashion. However, from
Figure 5(d) shows some hysteretic behaviour is evident. This is attributed to changes in the
level of prestress during the concurrent in-plane behaviour as well as some friction present in
the connections of the experimental apparatus. The overall force response to the applied
displacement pattern is shown in Figure 5(e). A slight degree of asymmetry in response is
evident, this is attributed to eccentric placement of the tendons at the top of the wall. No
damage to the precast concrete unit was observed during this experiment on Wall 2. The
theoretical force capacity arising from the bi-lateral push-over analysis for the double 4-leaf
clover loading pattern is shown in Figure 5(f). The combination of 50% prestressing of
fuse-bars gave the optimum solution in this design.
6.2
Figure 6 presents the overall experimental performance of Wall 2 which comprises a couple
of unbounded tendons prestressed to 50% of their yield capacity plus four external
mechanical energy dissipators. The external energy dissiptors were first prefabricated, and
then welded to a steel angle at the foundation and attached to the wall through bolts that were
grouted in place across the center of the first and sixth of section void (refer to Figure 6(g)).
Wall 2 was tested using double 4-leaf clover pattern up to 1.5% drift as given Figure 6(a).
The in-plane force response to the applied displacement pattern is shown in Figure 5 (b)
where a modest amount of hysteresis is evident. Results show that Wall 2 still maintain a
self-centering capability with only a small value of residual displacement recorded during
unloading.
It should be noted that buckling of the mechanical energy dissipators devices caused minor
residual displacement. It can be seen in Figure 6(c) where the theoretical result shows that
during unloading path, the wall went back to it original position without any residual
displacement. Figure 6(d) shows experimental and theoretical for out-of-plane response.
Figure 6(e) illustrates the experimental bi-lateral loading path behaviour while Figure 6(f)
shows the theoretical bi-lateral loading path response. At +1.0% drift under in-plane loading,
the threaded bars, which were holding the mechanical energy dissipators, bent and the
through-bolts became loose. When the drift increased up to 1.5%, the concrete immediately
surrounding the threaded through-bolts started to crush and crack lines propagated around
the bolts. This slight degree of damage is evident in the photographs of Figure 6(g) and (h).
During the 1.5% drift amplitude, the mechanical energy dissipators buckled outward from the
wall due to compression force during unloading cycle. This type of energy dissipator is not
suitable to use because it is located outside the wall and for aesthetic reason.
2)
3)
4)
Bonded fuse-bars is not suitable to use in precast wall panel because it is difficult
to replace, yielded after strong earthquake and cannot replace due to the location
inside the foundation beam.
Mechanical energy devices had problem of buckling during unloading cycle and
some cracks were formed around high yield threaded rods. In addition these rods
also buckling during uplifting of the wall.
The success of the rocking hollowcore walls is attributed to the Damage
Avoidance Design (DAD) approach that requires carefully detailed armouring at
the base of the wall to enable high point load stresses to be dispersed up the wall
and also into the foundation.
REFERENCES
Berg, G.V., and Stratta, J.L. (1964)."Anchorage and the Alaska Earthquake on March 27,
1964." American Iron and Steel Institute, 63pp.
Chiewanichakorn, M. (1999). Stability of Thin Precast Concret Wall Panels Subejected to
Gravity and Seismic Forces, M.E. Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering,
University of Canterbury.
Ghosh, S.K. (2001)."Observations from the Bhuj Earthquake of January 16, 2001." PCI
Journal, Vol.46, No.2 ( March-April 2001), pp 34-42.
Holden, T. J., Restrepo, J., and Mander, J.B. (2003). "Seismic Performance of Precast
Reinforced and Prestressed Concrete Walls," Journal of Structural
Engineering,Vol.129, No.3, ASCE, March 2003, pp 286-296.
Iverson, J.K., and Hawkins, N.M.(1994)." Performance of Precast/Prestressing Building
Structures During Northridge Earthquake." PCI Journal, Vol.36, No.2 (March-April,
1994), pp38-55.
Lander, M. R. E. (2001). Analytical Modelling of Reinforced Concrete Wall Behaviour
Under Seismic Loading, ME Report, Department of Civil Engineering, University
of Canterbury.
Mander, J.B., and Cheng, C.-T.(1997). "Seismic Resistance of Piers Based on Damage
Avoidance Design," Technical Report NCEER-97-0014, State University of New
York at Buffalo, Department of Civil, Structural and Environmental Engineering,
Buffalo, New York, U.S.A.
McMenanin, A. P. (1999) The Performance of Slender Precast reinforced Cantilever
Walls with Roof Level Lateral Displacement Restrain under Simulated In-Plane
Seismic Loading, M.E. Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, University of
Canterbury.
Wyllie Jr, L. A., and Filson, J. R. (1989). "Armenia Earthquake Reconnaissance Report."
Earthquake Spectra, Special Supplement (August 1989).
Youd, T.L., Bardet, J.P., Bray, J.D. (2000). " Kocaeli, Turkey, Earthquake of August 17,1999
Reconnaissance Report." Earthquake Spectra, Supplement A to Volume 6, (December
2000).
LONGITUDINAL
LOADS
TRANSVERSE
LOADS
(a)
)
b
(
Rafters
supported
on
PHCW's
Seismic
Wall
Door
Wind
Trusses
Non-Seismic
Wall
(b)
RAFTER
RB25N
STEEL CHANNEL
UNBONDED TENDON
SEISMIC
WALL
NON-SEISMIC
WALL
( C)
SEALANT
NON-SEISMIC
WALL
STEEL CHANNEL
RUBBER PAD
SPREAD FOOTING
(c)
Figure 3.2: The prototype of warehouse Type III building; (a) 3D isometric view of the warehouse;
(b)layout plan showing the schematic arrangement of seismic and non-seismic walls together with
wind trusses; and (c)side elevation showing the locations of unbonded tendons inside the seismic
wall are screwed to the couplers inside the foundation beam.
Y
PHCW
THREADED BAR
DIAMETER 20mm
RB25
STEEL BLOCK
WITH 25MM HOLE
MECHANICAL
ENERGY DEVICES
RB25N
UNBONDED
TENDONS (RB25)
PHCW REFILL
WITH CONCRETE
fcu=67MPa
STEEL
ANGLE
THREADED ROD
WITH 12MM DIAMETER
BONDED
FUSE-BARS
(Diameter-16mm)
RB25C (COUPLERS)
STEEL CHANNEL
(254x89x35.74kg/m)
FOUNDATION BEAM
RB25N (NUTS)
STEEL
STIFFENER
(300x215x10)
PINTEL
FOUNDATION BEAM
Fuse length
=150mm
(b)
(a)
34kN MASS
CONCRETE
BLOCK
STEEL ANGLE
UNBONDED
FUSE-BARS
UNBONDED
TENDONS (RB25)
SELF-WEIGHT
PHCW=3.45kN/M
EXTERNAL
MECHANICAL
ENERGY
DISSIPATOR
STEEL CHANNEL
BONDED
FUSE-BARS
PRECAST
FOUNDATION
BEAM
WALL 1
(c)
WALL 2
(d)
Figure 3.3: Test specimens used in the experimental investigation; (a) PHCW in-filled with concrete
together with connection interface between PHCW and foundation beam; (b) connection detailing for
mechanical energy dissipators; (c) location energy dissipators inside Wall 1-P+A; (d) combination of
unbonded tendons and energy dissipators on Wall 2.
OUT-OF-PLANE ACUATOR
IN-PLANE RESISTANCE
ACUATOR
3330
PHCW
UNBONDED
TENDON
FOUNDATION BEAM
SHAKING TABLE
(a)
NORTH ELEVATION
P27
P21
P26
P19
P20
P17
P18
P15
P16
P25
P13
P14
P24
P4 P5 P6 P7
P8
P1
P2
P3
P22
(b) INSTRUMENTATION
(c)
Figure 3.4: Experimental set-up and instrumentation: (a)schematic loading frame for Wall 1-P+A and
Wall 2 on shaking table; (b) instrumentation arrangement for Wall 1-P+A and Wall 2 on shaking
table; and (c) photograph looking south-east of the wall specimen ready for testing.
CONCRETE
BLOCK=34KN
P.S=166kN
Fy =260kN
Bonded
Fuse-bar
Dia=16mm
Fy=260kN
WALL 1- P + A
Figure 3.5: Theoretical and experimental results for Wall 1 with 64% prestressing of unbonded tendon
tested on shaking table: (a) 4-leaf clover displacement controlled pattern; (b) experimental in-plane
behaviour; (c) theoretical in-plane behaviour; (d) experimental and theoretical out-of-plane behaviour;
(e) experimental biaxial loading path; and (f) theoretical biaxial loading path.
CONCRETE
BLOCK=34kN
P.S=84kN
Fy=166kN
P.S= 0kN
Fy= 260kN
WALL 2- P+B
Figure 3.6: The experimental and theoretical results of Wall 2-P+B : Performance snug tight
unbonded tendons and 50% prestressing unbonded fuse-bars; (a) double 4-leaf clover displacement
controlled pattern at different level of drift; (b) experimental in-plane behaviour; (c) theoretical inplane behaviour; (d) experimental and theoretical out-of-plane behaviour ; (e) experimental bi-lateral
loading path; (f) theoretical loading path.
CONCRETE
BLOCK=34kN
Fy=260kN
P.S=130kN
EXTERNAL
MECHANICAL
ENERGY
DISSIPATOR
WALL 2-P + C
(g)
(h)
Figure 3.7: Wall 2-P+C: Performance with 50% prestressing unbonded tendons and external
mechanical energy dissipators; (a) double 4-leaf clover displacement controlled pattern; (b) in-plane
behaviour; (c) theoretical in-plane behaviour; (d) theoretical and experimental out-of-plane behaviour;
(e) experimental biaxial load path; (f) theoretical biaxial load path; (g) buckling of energy dissipators;
and (h) location of energy dissipators at front view.
CHAPTER 4
FORMAT FOR POSTER PRESENTATION
4.1 TITLE OF THE POSTER PRESENTATION
The title must be located at the top page and centered. It should be bolded with font size 12 pt
(Microsoft Power Point). The authors names together with affiliations should be formatted as
follows:
PAPER TITLE
(12 PT, ARIAL, BOLD STYLE)
First authors name, Second authors name and Third authors name
Faculty of Civil Engineering, UiTM
(8pt, Arial, Bold)
Example:
PM Ir. Dr. Sooi Took Kowng, En. Yong Chua Bon, Prof. Wan Mahmood Wan Abd Majid and Ir. Hj. Shan Bin Suleiman.
Faculty of Civil Engineering, UiTM
4.2 ABSTRACT
The abstract should be in Bold Arial font, size 8 pt. The abstract text must be single-lined in font size
8 pt, Bold Arial. It should contain an overview of your research work together with the outcomes and
must be summarized not more than 350 words.
PROBLEM STATEMENT
OBJECTIVES
BRIEF LITERATURE REVIEW
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
RESULTS, ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION
CONCLUSION
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
Kindly acknowledge the support, help, contribution of individuals, agencies, etc. that you
received and utilized towards completing this work
4.11
FIGURES
All photographs should be of high quality, ready for typesetting. Images should be in
JPG/JPEG format and of a high resolution (300 DPI or better).
Background colour
Blue (WRES Division)
Green (StruC Division)
Yellow (CEPM Division)
Maroon (IsES Division)
Poster size (3 X 4)
Example Poster