Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Professor Farshid
4) How do you resolve this seemingly paradoxical result that the most productive domestic
firm may lose out to some of the least productive firms in a low wage country.
A local firm might be the most productive firm in a certain industry (say a US firm in apparel
industry) but the industry is not amongst the more productive industries in the country. That is the
productivity advantages of other firms are even higher than the firm in question (compared to
other countries). If the firm is located in a country that average productivity is high wages are
also high so the productivity advantage of the firm might not be strong enough to outweigh its
wage disadvantage.
British interest around the globe including opening and monopolizing new markets for
British products.
6) Proximity: How can proximity explain part of international trade?
Countries that are close to each other, particularly if they share a common boarder are
observed to trade more heavily with each other. One reason for this is lower
transportation cost. Cultural similarities help human interactions and trade between two
countries. This is more likely to be the case with countries that share common boarders.
7) In a purely exchange economy with only two people and two goods show that trade is mutually
advantages to all partied.
8) In a purely exchange economy show that with more than two people show that international
trade is not necessarily advantages to everyone.
Malaysia
Indonesia
ULR
Shirts
Cameras _ labor force
20
10
200
20
40
400
1) Which country has absolute advantage in shirt production and why? What about camera
production?
Malaysia has absolute advantage in Camera because it can produce Cameras
with fewer resources (labor) compared to Indonesia. No country has absolute
advantage in the production of shirts.
2) Which country has comparative advantage in Shirts and why?
Malaysia
Indonesia
OC of Shirts (in terms of Cameras) 20/10 = 2
20/40 =0.5
Indonesia has comparative advantage Shirt because opportunity cost of shirt production is
lower in that country.
3) What is relative price of Shirts in Malaysia before trade? What about Indonesia?
Relative price of Shirts before trade is equal to the opportunity cost of shirt production.
Autarky PS/PC in Malaysia = 2 and Autarky PS/PC in Indonesia = 0.5
4) Draw a graph showing production possibility frontier of Malaysia and Indonesia. Have
Shirt production of the horizontal axis and Camera on the Vertical axis.
QC
QC
Malaysia
LM /aLC =
200/10= 20
aLS/aLC = 2
10
10
QS
Indonesia
bLS/bLC = 0.5
LI /bLS = 400/20= 20
QS
5) If world price of shirts to cameras were 1 what would be the world production of Camera
and Shirts? Which country would produce each?
Indonesia produces 400/20 = 20 units of shirts and exports its excess supply.
Malaysia produces 200/10 = 20 and exports its excess supply.
6) Use a hypothetical indifference curve in a graph showing gains from trade for each country
(when international PS/PC =1).
QC
QC
Malaysia
20
Indonesia
PC/PS= 1
Consn
after trade
10
Consn
before trade
PC/PS= 1
QS
10
20
QS
W
fall
rise
rise
RK
rise
fall
fall
RT
rise
fall
fall
Since prices are constant, real returns change in the same direction as nominal returns.
b) Suppose that under free trade Home would be exporting Food. Of the three factors of
production which one would benefit from trade and which one would lose out.
If Home exports Food that means relative price of food rises with trade. That would
increase return to Land RT and a reduction in return to capital RK. In this case, capital
owners are interested in pushing for autarky. Land owners, obviously, are interested in
free trade.
c) In 1986, the price of oil on world markets dropped sharply. Since the United States is
an oil-importing country, this was widely regarded as good for the U.S. economy. Yet in
Texas and Louisiana in 1986 was a year of economic decline. Why? What will your
prediction be about the current state of economy of these states taking into account the
new price developments in the world? (Hint: Texas and Louisiana are both major oil
producing states in the US)
Since oil related industries in these states are competing with imports a decrease in the
price of imported oil, reduces the incomes of factors specific to the oil and gas industries
leading to an overall economic decline in these states.
The prediction about the current situation should be just the opposite, since currently the
world oil prices are very high and would cause an increase in the incomes of the factors
specific to the oil industry. And since oil-related industries are dominant in the two states
we would expect their overall economic performance to be very good.
IV-Factor Movement [15 points]
Make an argument showing that
a) there is a tendency for labor to migrate from the rest of the world to US
b) migration improves US GDP but it can lower the GDP of the ROW
c) migration is beneficial for the migrants and workers in the foreign country but it
hurts workers in the host country
d) owners of land/capital in the host country (U.S.) are better off as a result of labor
migration
e) the world as a whole is better as a result of migration
a)
Wage
Wage
B
W
C
W*
MPL
MPL*
O
O*
There are two factors of production: Land (T) and Labor (L), two countries and one good.
Both countries have the same technology but different overall land-labor ratios. Home is
the land-abundant country and Foreign is the labor-abundant country.
Foreign workers would like to move to Home until the marginal product of labor is the
same in the two countries. Increase Home labor force & thus the real wage falls in Home.
Decrease the Foreign labor force & increase the real wage in Foreign.
The redistribution of the worlds labor force = >Increases the worlds output as a whole
Leaves some groups worse off. Leads to a convergence of real wage rates
Assuming that the immigrant labor becomes the citizen of Home country