Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ISSUE-2
May 2014
BMSB
FIN-CONNECT
EDITOR Bikramaditya Ghosh, Asst. Prof.
EDITORIAL COMMITTEE- DR.Umashanker K /Ms. GAYATRI BHAT, Asst. Prof.
/Mr. B.V.RAO /Mr. Keshava Murthy
Strictly for Internal Circulation
Fin Connect
Page 1
Content
Editorial By Mr. Bikramaditya Ghosh, Asst. Prof. Manipal
University
P-3-3
USD Vs. EURO A comparative Study from INR perspective
By Tanya Singh 10A
P-4-11
P-12-21
P-22-34
P-34-43
P-44-49
Disclaimer- This magazine does not reflect any views of either BOB or Manipal Group.
This is a pure research endeavor by budding managers of tomorrow.
Fin Connect
Page 2
Editorial
Fin Connect
Page 3
Introduction
Foreign Exchange market forms a very important part of a economy.
The foreign exchange market (Forex, FX, or currency market) is a global
decentralized market for the trading of currencies. The main participants
in this market are the larger international banks. Financial centers around
the world function as anchors of trading between a wide range of
different types of buyers and sellers around the clock, with the exception
of weekends. Electronic Broking Services (EBS) and Reuters 3000 Xtra
are two main interbank FX trading platforms. The foreign exchange
market determines the relative values of different currencies.
The foreign exchange market works through financial institutions, and it
operates on several levels. Behind the scenes banks turn to a smaller
number of financial firms known as dealers, who are actively involved
in large quantities of foreign exchange trading. Most foreign exchange
Fin Connect
Page 4
Page 5
100
80
60
40
20
0
0
50
100
150
Sample Percentile
Fin Connect
Page 6
5
0
0
20
40
60
80
-5
-10
X Variable 1
Interpretation
On the basis of the above linear regression model used we can make
the several interpretations which help is making us understand
whether does a relation between US$ and Euro currency exists and if
yes than how can it affect the exchange rates etc.
the regression analysis is basically used to establish relation that
how much change in independent variable can affect our
dependent variable
the R or R square tells about the forecasting of our regression
model i.e. it tells that it can correctly predict up to 91 % of
forecasting or variation in the level of USD due to change in the
EURO rate
this calculation has been made on the basis of 622 observations
which have been taken over the period of past 3years.
T Stat along with P Value teaches us that the phenomenon did not
happened by chance.
T Stat of +- 10 means the extreme ends of the distribution curve.
There if P Value is zero, that will signify that the distribution curve
do not have a long tail in either side.
On the contrary it has zero value in both the Tails, so the
distribution is concentrated straight & long.
Fin Connect
Page 7
Page 8
Interest rates, inflation and exchange rates are all highly correlated.
By manipulating interest rates, central banks exert influence over
both inflation and exchange rates, and changing interest rates
impact inflation and currency values. Higher interest rates offer
lenders in an economy a higher return relative to other countries.
Therefore, higher interest rates attract foreign capital and cause the
exchange rate to rise. The impact of higher interest rates is
mitigated, however, if inflation in the country is much higher than
in others, or if additional factors serve to drive the currency down.
The opposite relationship exists for decreasing interest rates - that
is, lower interest rates tend to decrease exchange rates.
The current account is the balance of trade between a country and
its trading partners, reflecting all payments between countries for
goods, services, interest and dividends. A deficit in the current
account shows the country is spending more on foreign trade than
it is earning, and that it is borrowing capital from foreign sources
to make up the deficit. In other words, the country requires more
foreign currency than it receives through sales of exports, and it
supplies more of its own currency than foreigners demand for its
Fin Connect
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
References
1. http://www.xe.com/currencycharts/?from=USD&to=INR
2. http://www.xe.com/currencycharts/?from=USD&to=EUR
3. http://www.xe.com/currencycharts/?from=INR&to=EUR
4. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reuters_3000_Xtra
5. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronic_Broking_Services
6. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Currency
HSBC Scandal Case Study on Money Laundering
By Prapti Barman 9E
Page 12
Page 13
ii)
Fin Connect
Page 14
Obtaining
KYC
information
Transaction
monitoring
using risk
based
approach
Report of
suspicious
transaction
s
Maintaining
records
In 2005 Bloomberg Markets magazine accused HSBC of moneylaundering for drug dealers and state sponsors of terrorism. CEO
Stephen Green quoted This was a singular and wholly irresponsible
attack on the banks international compliance procedures, but
subsequent investigation indicated that the accusation was accurate
and proved that the bank was involved in money laundering
throughout Mexico.
Page 15
HSBC also had business tie up with Al Rajhi Bank, biggest financial
institution of Saudi Arabia. After suspected tie of US 9/11 terrorist
attack with Al Rajhi Bank, HSBC US cut off all ties with the bank
after 2001. But when Al Rajhi began to threaten to withdraw global
ties with HSBC, HSBC US resumed business transaction with the
bank after 2006.
Fin Connect
Page 16
Fin Connect
Page 17
RANKING COMMITTEE
MEMBER - Tom Coburn R
David Bagley
David S. Cohen
Paul Thurston
Panel 1
Leigh H. Winchell
Michael Gallagher
Christopher Lok
Panel 2
Irene Dorner
Thomas J. Curry
Grace E. Dailey
Panel 3
Stuart A. Levey
Daniel P. Stipano
Panel 4
Fin Connect
Page 18
Violations:
Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) by failing to maintain an effective anti-money
laundering program and to conduct appropriate due diligence on its
foreign correspondent account holders.
International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) and the
Trading with the Enemy Act (TWEA) by illegally conducting transactions
on behalf of customers in Cuba, Iran, Libya, Sudan and Burma.
HSBC appeal:
Since 2009 it increased its investment in AML policy nine times and
also withdrew from various business transactions.
Paul Thurston, HSBC Chief of Retail and Wealth Management, said the
bank 'took wrongdoing seriously' and provided evidence for the same
Senate Report:
From 2001 to 2007, HSBC affiliates sent almost 25,000 transactions
involving Iran worth over $19billion (12billion) through HBUS and
other US accounts, while concealing any link with Iran in 85 per cent of
the transactions.
Many of HSBCs breaches related to its use of so-called bearer share
accounts, in which ownership of shares and the income they incur can be
passed from person to person in secrecy.
In 2010, one disgusted top compliance official threw up his hands and
quit after less than a year on the job, according to the report.
At the heart of HSBC's failings was the fact that it served as a hub for
smaller financial firms needing access to the global banking system, the
report said.
Fin Connect
Page 19
HSBC continued to do business with one client Sigue Corp that admitted
to U.S. law enforcement that it had failed to maintain an effective antimoney laundering system.
Outcome:
Deferred Prosecution Agreement with US Department of Justice.
Fin Connect
Page 20
Fin Connect
Page 21
REFERENCES
www.google.co.in
http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2012/12/10/hsbc-said-to-near-1-9-billionsettlement-over-money-laundering/?_r=2
http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article38132.html
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/sociopol_globalbanking
286.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HSBC
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-18880269
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/12/11/us-hsbc-probeidUSBRE8BA05M20121211
http://sevenpillarsinstitute.org/case-studies/hsbc-money-laundering-casetoo-big-to-fail-does-not-mean-too-big-to-jail
Fin Connect
Page 22
Fin Connect
Page 23
Govt Securities
Government Securities are securities issued by the Government for
raising a public loan or as notified in the official Gazette. They consist
of Government Promissory Notes, Bearer Bonds, Stocks or Bonds held
in Bond Ledger Account. They may be in the form of Treasury Bills or
Dated Government Securities.
Features of Government Securities
Issued at face value
No default risk as the securities carry sovereign guarantee.
Ample liquidity as the investor can sell the security in the
secondary market
Interest payment on a half yearly basis on face value
No tax deducted at source
Can be held in Demat form.
Rate of interest and tenor of the security is fixed at the time of
issuance and is not subject to change (unless intrinsic to the
security like FRBs - Floating Rate Bonds).
Redeemed at face value on maturity
Maturity ranges from of 2-30 years.
Fin Connect
Page 24
201011Q4
201112Q1
201112Q2
201112Q3
201112Q4
Uniform
Price
15
30
34
37
39
Page 25
6
7
8
9
201213Q1
201213Q3
201213Q4
201314Q1
48
0
0
8
Yield Based
In this type of auction, RBI announces the issue size or notified amount
and the tenor of the paper to be auctioned. The bidders submit bids in
term of the yield at which they are ready to buy the security. If the Bid is
more than the cut-off yield then its rejected otherwise it is accepted
Price Based
In this type of auction, RBI announces the issue size or notified amount
and the tenor of the paper to be auctioned, as well as the coupon rate.
The bidders submit bids in terms of the price. This method of auction is
normally used in case of reissue of existing Government Securities. Bids
at price lower, then the cut off price are rejected and bids higher, then
the cut off price are accepted. Price Based auction leads to a better price
discovery then the Yield based auction.
Underwriting in Auction
One day prior to the auction, bids are received from the Primary Dealers
(PD) indicating the amount they are willing to underwrite and the fee
expected. The auction committee of RBI then examines the bid on the
basis of the market condition and takes a decision on the amount to be
underwritten and the fee to be paid. In case of devolvement, the bids put
in by the PDs are set off against the amount underwritten while
deciding the amount of devolvement and in case the auction is fully
subscribed, the PD need not subscribe to the issue unless they have bid
Fin Connect
Page 26
for it.
State Development Loans
State Development Loans (SDLs) are issued by the State Governments
and RBI coordinates the actual process of selling these securities. Each
state is allowed to issue securities up to a certain limit each year.
Generally, the coupon rates on State Development Loans are marginally
higher than those of GOI-Secs issued for the same maturity.
The State Development Loans are normally sold through the auction
process. All the auctions are multiple price auctions, through
competitive bidding, conducted by Reserve Bank of India and allotment
procedure is similar to that for GOI-Secs. Non-competitive bidding has
been introduced in the auction of SDL. State Development Loans also
qualify for SLR status. Interest payment frequency is half yearly and
other modalities are similar to GOI-Secs. They are issued in
dematerialized form. State Government Securities can be issued in the
physical form (in the form of Stock Certificate) on separate request and
are transferable. Like in the case of G-Secs no stamp duty is payable on
transfer of State Development Loans also.
State Development Loans are eligible securities for Liquidity
Adjustment Facility (LAF)-Repos. Schedule Commercial
Bank(excluding RRBs) and Primary Dealers can offer State
Development Loans as eligible securities to the RBI under LAF Repo
Treasury bills
Treasury Bills are short term (up to one year) borrowing instruments of
the Government of India which enable investors to park their short term
surplus funds while reducing their market risk.
Fin Connect
Page 27
Treasury Bills are issued in the form of SGL - entries in the books of
Reserve Bank of India to hold the securities on behalf of the holder.
The SGL holdings can be transferred by issuing a SGL transfer form
Treasury Bills are also being issued under the Market Stabilization
Scheme (MSS)
Page 28
securities and thus are issued at a discount to face value. The return to
the investor is the difference between the maturity value and issue price
Treasury Bills or T-Bills as they are known are issued by the
Government of India to meet their short-term requirement. T-Bills are
issued for 91-day, 182-day and 364-day maturities. T-Bills are issued at
a discount to their face value and redeemed at par.
364-day T-Bills forms part of the government borrowing programme.
There are three types of Treasury Bills: 91-day T-bill - maturity is in 91 days. Its auction is weekly on every
Wednesday.
Fin Connect
Page 29
Fin Connect
G-Sec
511027
SDL
7012
T-Bills
89055
774209
8136
96302
825093
13241
74675
990322
15824
87838
1155405
21143
116493
1335305
26026
162450
1175013
32694
120507
2254019
38103
150879
3655640
43834
161131
Page 30
4000000
3500000
3000000
2500000
2000000
G-Sec
1500000
SDL
1000000
T-Bills
500000
0
Share (%)
Year
201112Q1
201112Q2
201112Q3
201112Q4
201213Q1
2012Fin Connect
G-Sec
84.2
SDL
1.2
T-Bills
14.7
88.1
0.9
11.0
90.4
1.5
8.2
90.5
1.4
8.0
89.4
1.6
9.0
87.6
1.7
10.7
Page 31
13Q2
201213Q3
201213Q4
201314Q1
88.5
2.5
9.1
92.3
1.6
6.2
94.7
1.1
4.2
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
G-Sec
SDL
T-Bills
Page 32
money is in safe hands. This is because of the fact that the yield would
not deviate much in the long run.
Central
GS CG2023
Government 7.16%
Treasury
TB364D
Bills
040914
State
SG M AH23
Government 9.51%
PSU's
PT PFC18
9.81%
Bank Bonds BB IDBI21
9.45%
Corporate
DB LICH18
debentures 9.16%
Institutional ID EXIM16
Bonds
9.47%
Fin Connect
Value(Rs No of Total
mn)
trades traded
value(Rs
mn)
78532.5 182
%
share
in
traded
value
211913.32 40.81%
11000
148713.53 28.64%
2051.75 7
14363.46
2.77%
11669
64
57601.75
11.09%
1600
5076
0.98%
3000
46387.6
8.93%
35210
6.78%
4000
Page 33
6.78%
Central Government
0.98%
40.81%
11.09%
Treasury Bills
State Government
PSU's
2.77%
28.64%
Bank Bonds
Corporate debentures
Institutional Bonds
The above chart depicts the present status of debt market in India. It can
be ranked as:
Page 34
REFERENCES
www.nseindia.com
www.bseindia.com
www.investing.com
www.google.com
www.investopedia.com
www.ccilindia.com
Poverty is scarcity, dearth, or the state of one who lacks a certain amount
of material possessions or money.
Poverty can be of different types like absolute poverty and relative
poverty. There may be many other types- primary poverty, secondary
poverty, and many more. Whatever be the type of poverty, the basic
Fin Connect
Page 35
reason has always been lack of adequate incomes. Here comes the role
of unemployment behind poverty.
Lack of employment opportunities and the consequential income
disparity bring about mass poverty in most of the developing and under
developed economies of the world.
Poverty is usually measured as absolute poverty or relative poverty (the
latter being an index of income inequality).
ABSOLUTE POVERTY
Absolute poverty refers to a set of standard which is consistent over time
and between countries.
The world bank defines extreme poverty as living on less than US $1.25
per day, and moderate poverty as less than $2 a day (but note that a
person or family with access to subsistence resources, e.g. subsistence
farmers may have a low cash income without a correspondingly low
standard of living they are not living on their cash income but using it
as a top up). It estimates that in 2001, 1.1 billion people had
consumption levels below $1 a day and 2.7 billion lived on less than $2
a day.
RELATIVE POVERTY
Relative poverty views poverty as socially defined and dependent on
social context, hence relative poverty is a measure of income inequality.
Usually, relative poverty is measured as the percentage of population
with income less than some fixed proportion of median income. There
are several other different income inequality metrics, for example the
Gini coefficient or the Theil Index.
Fin Connect
Page 36
Fin Connect
Page 37
Page 38
less than $2 per day, as first defined in 1998 by Professors C.K. Prahalad
and Stuart L. Hart. It was subsequently expanded upon by both in their
books: The Fortune at the Bottom of the pyramid by Prahalad in 2004
and Capitalism at the crossroads by Hart in 2005.
BELOW POVERTY LINE
Below poverty line is an economic benchmark and poverty threshold
used by the government of India to indicate economic disadvantage and
to identify the individuals and households in need of government
assistance and aid. It is determined using various parameters which vary
from state to state and within states.
Criterias are different for rural and urban areas. In its Tenth Five year
plan, the degree of deprivation is measured with the help of parameters
with scores given from 0-4, with 13 parameters. Families with 17 marks
or less (formerly 15 marks or less) out of 52 marks have been classified
as BPL.
In its Tenth Five year plan(2002-2007) survey, BPL for rural areas was
based on the degree of deprivation in respect of 13 parameters, with
scores from 0-4: land holding, type of house, clothing, food security,
sanitation, consumer durables, literacy status, labor force, means of
livelihood, status of children, type of indebtedness, reasons for
migration, etc.
The Planning commission fixed an upper limit of 3.26 lakh for rural
BPL families on the basis of simple survey. Accordingly families having
less than 15 marks out of 52 marks have been classified as BPL and their
number works out to 3.18 lakh.
The poverty line was originally fixed in terms of income/food
requirement in 1978. It was stipulated that the calorie standard for a
Fin Connect
Page 39
typical individual in rural areas was 2400 calorie and was 2100 calorie
in urban areas. Then the cost of grain (about 650 grams) that fulfill this
normative standard was calculated. This cost was the poverty line. In
1978, it was Rs. 61.80 per person per month for rural areas and Rs.
71.30 for urban areas. Since then the Planning Commission calculates
the poverty line every year adjusting for inflation.
POVERTY IN INDIA
The HRD 2010 measures poverty in terms of a new parameter , namely
multidimensional poverty index (MPI), which replaced the human
poverty index (HPI) used since 1997. The MPI indicates the share of the
population that is multidimensionally poor adjusted by the intensity of
deprivation in terms of living standard, health and education.
According to this parameter, India with a poverty index of 0.296 and
poverty ratios of 41.6 percent (in terms of PPP $1.25 a day) and 28.6 per
cent (national poverty line) is not favourably placed when compared
with countries like China and Sri Lanka.
In fact, the difference in population below the poverty line (BPL) widens
substantially in case of India when this indicator is used instead of the
national poverty line indicator, while for other countries, there is less of
a difference and in some cases even a fall.
National poverty estimates (% below poverty line) (1993 2012)
Rural
Urban
Total
1993 94
50.1
31.8
45.3
2004 05
41.8
25.7
37.2
Year
Fin Connect
Page 40
2009 10
33.8
20.9
29.8
2011 12
25.7
13.7
21.9
TENDULKAR COMMITTEE
In 2005, another expert group to review methodology for poverty
estimation, chaired by Suresh Tendulkar, was constituted by the
Planning Commission to address the following three shortcomings of the
Fin Connect
Page 41
Fin Connect
Page 42
Rural
Urban
Total
28.3
25.7
27.5
Lakdawala
Committee
41.8
27.5
37.2
Tendulkar
Committee
Source: Report of the Expert Group on Estimation of Proportion and
Number of Poor, 1993, Perspective Planning Division, Planning
Commission; Report of the Expert Group to Review the Methodology for
Estimation of Poverty, 2009, Planning Commission; PRS
The Committee also recommended a new method of updating poverty
lines, adjusting for changes in prices and patterns of consumption, using
the consumption basket of people close to the poverty line. Thus, the
estimates released in 2009-10 and 2011-12 use this method instead of
using indices derived from the CPI-AL for rural areas and CPI-IW for
urban areas as was done earlier. Table 5 outlines the poverty lines
computed using the Tendulkar Committee methodology for the years
2004-05, 2009-10 and 2011-12.
National poverty lines (in Rs per capita per month) for the years
2004-05, 2009-10 and 2011-12
Year
Rural
Urban
2004-05
446.7
578.8
2009-10
672.8
859.6
2011-12
816.0
1000.0
Fin Connect
Page 43
3. Wikipedia
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Holders of Dirty Money make efforts to convert such money into White
money, but it is not a simple issue. Holders of Black Money may declare
the quantum of concealed income or wealth well before detection by the
competent authority and get away from the sin by paying the prescribed
taxes and penalty and breathe easy. Not so in the case of Dirty Money.
Just as dirty clothes are to be laundered and changed to clean clothes for
re-use, Dirty Money requires laundering and hence the term "Money
Laundering". Money laundering means disguising illegal sources of
money so that it would appear having received from legal sources. By
using the process of Money Laundering, taint attached to such money is
sought to be removed so that the money can be utilized like legal money.
Methods used for "Money Laundering" make an interesting study. There
are many methods of Money Laundering but all of them consist of three
major steps. The first step is called Structuring or Placement which
involves introducing Dirty Money into financial system by some method
or combinations of various methods explained below. The second step is
to carry out complex financial transactions in order to camouflage the
illegal sources. The third step is to retrieve the money and acquire
wealth generated from such transactions. The second and third step
involves transfer of funds to different accounts in a series of transactions
so that tracing of the source becomes almost impossible.
Some of the interesting methods adopted for Money Laundering are as
under:
Fin Connect
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
system now being used mostly for illegal transfer of funds, by defeating
provisions of various laws.
In a nutshell the nut is in the shell - if you want peace of mind have only
one type of Money. The Money or (White) Money. Earn legally, account
properly and pay your due taxes. And be Happy!
Economic Update
Crude Oil price steadily went up to 122 USD per 1 Barrel. Also, 1
USD= 66 INR, that means dual loss has made the way for the
Government. However some respite came to Government as the US
10 Year Benchmark moved in to 2.85% zone. So, the investments
That GOI made are paying them handsome dividends. Equities are
reacting sharply & Market Volume is taking a beating along with
Market width.
Non Deliverable Forwards or NDFs are speculating rather than
hedging.
NDFs are commonly quoted for time periods of one month up to one
year, and are normally quoted and settled in U.S. dollars. They have
become a popular instrument for corporations seeking to hedge
Fin Connect
Page 50
Current 1D 1W 1M 3M 1Y
1-Year 10.36 -35.7 32 59 300 212
2-Year 9.70 -47.0 8 37 236 145
5-Year 9.06 -21.1 17 23 172 83
10-Year 8.79 -20.2 18 25 142 48
15-Year 9.01 -13.8 23 36 158 58
20-Year 9.15 -11.8 31 47 167 62
30-Year 9.18 -13.4 29 43 169 53
10Y Benchmark 8.48 -26.6 -31 -25 105 24
10Y-5Y Spread* -59 -57 -6 -3 11 1
Fin Connect
Page 51
Thank You
Fin Connect
Page 52