Professional Documents
Culture Documents
BY
IN RE: REQ
Now on t e 22nd day of June, 2015, the above referenced is considered by the
undersigned Sen or Judge, assigned, The Court Clerk of Crawford County Kansas has received,
purportedly for 'ling, two "pleadings." One is entitled "Objection to Order Denying Grand Jury
and Request for
and
Request for Exte sion of Time." On their face it is incontrovertible these documents are
presented for fili g by the individuals who filed the original petition for grand jury with the
district court.
In the Order denying the petition for a grand jury this court, relying on both
controlling aut orities and persuasive authorities, determined under the laws of the State of
Kansas, once a grand jury petition is presented by the public the public's involvement with
the proceeding
eases. Specifically this court held: "Once a petition for a grand jury is filed
the involvem
t of the persons
Court quoted
e Kansas
Supreme
ceases." This
ruled: "However,
upon
the submissio
of the petition,
in the grand
(emphasis
in an unpublished
lack
analysis foun
Jury Filed by
These
tanding
to appeal
an order denying
a grand jury
jury
process
supplied).
opinion
presenting
as the
the
and in a separate
See In re Grand
2011).
mbers of the citizenry are thus not parties or participants at any level or any
action. Further, even if they had the standing to present these "pleadings" there is no statutory
authority to gr nt any of the various requests presented. As was arguably thoroughly and
sufficiently ex lained in the previous order, grand juries are, in Kansas, a creature of statute.
Thus any proc eding conducted in conjunction therewith must be authorized by statute. The
grand jury stat tes do not provide for "extensions" to obtain additional signatures, procedures
for "reconside
legal
The pIe
ings filed after the Order Denying Grand Jury, are thus a nullity. The persons
presenting the
etition should be afforded the right to appeal this court's orders to a higher
this court here y instructs the Clerk to refuse any other filings in this matter. If any pleading
is refused as n t pertinent to any such appeal (if such appeal is available) these persons will
be afforded the right and opportunity to request that the same be reviewed by a district judge.
That request
fashion that it
in this Order
Restricting Fi ngs will be construed to in any way alter the general statues and rules
regarding juris ietion of a ease once appropriately docketed and jurisdiction
the appellate e urts.
IT IS S ORDERED
is assumed by
t5/;2)/I~
'~I~I~
1111111
II
;5:00
0 N
;=~ ...
uNlreo
~.so,>-
rn ..-u { .:,
1",I'IIIIII'IIiIJlI,III,II"
Noah Day
~;I~~~
IIII#~~
11111,11111111'1'111111"111'11'11,1
~o~
~~O!
~~:::!II~I
POBox 224
Pittsburg KS 66762
III
(J) CJ'I
NCO 0
~ ~CO~
(J)
&'E7-E~2::(:::;~::~2:::~
Ei()()~3
CJ'I
I Ii I
en
(I!
(II