Professional Documents
Culture Documents
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
(SACRAMENTO DIVISION)
11
RANDAL NOTESTINE, ) Case No. 2:06-cv-1945 WBS DAD
12 )
Plaintiff, )
13 ) STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE
v. ) PRETRIAL DEADLINES
14 )
GUIDANT CORPORATION; GUIDANT )
15 SALES CORPORATION; CARDIAC )
PACEMAKERS, INC.; BOSTON SCIENTIFIC )
16 CORPORATION; RIDEOUT MEMORIAL )
HOSPITAL; and Does 1 through 100, inclusive, )
17 )
Defendants. )
18 )
)
19 )
)
20
21
22 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their designated counsel
23 that the deadline for Defendants to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint in this
24 action should be extended. Defendants seek to transfer this case to the Multi-District Litigation
25 proceeding established in the United States District Court, District of Minnesota (“MDL court”), and
26 Plaintiff has indicated that he will soon be filing a motion to remand this case to state court.
28
1 The deadline for Defendants to file an answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s complaint
2 shall be as follows:
3 (a) if the case is not remanded to state court, and is transferred to the MDL court, any
5 (b) if the case is not remanded and also is not transferred to the MDL court, any response
6 will be due thirty (30) days after the decision by the JPML denying transfer to the MDL court; or
7 (c) if the case is remanded, any response will be due thirty (30) days after the remand
9 The parties also stipulate that the November 20, 2006, status conference will be continued for
10 sixty (60) days until January 29, 2007 at 9:00 a.m. All other deadlines will be set pursuant to
12 IT IS SO STIPULATED.
13
1 ORDER
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28