Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Homeland
Security
Strategic
Plan
Part I
Governors Vision
Rick Perry, Governor
January 30, 2004
CONTENTS
Forward
GOVERNORS LETTER
Part 1
GOVERNORS VISION
Part 2
GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
Part 3
STATE OF TEXAS EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PLAN
ii
STATE OF TEXAS
OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR
January 30, 2004
My fellow Texans:
Our great state has always prided itself on its strength and resilience. We have faced countless challenges
from natures fury to manmade disasters with a resolve and grit recognized around the world as uniquely
Texas. Our history has prepared us well to respond to any threat, including terrorism.
Immediately after the tragic attacks of September 11, 2001, my office began working to strengthen our
states ability to prevent and respond to the threat of terrorism. Texas already is home to an emergency
system that is among the nations best. From our largest cities to our smallest towns, I am confident in
our states ability to handle any crisis. But there is more we can do. Continued vigilance and planning on
the part of state and local officials will help ensure the safety of our citizens, our property and the freedom
we cherish.
On July 16, 2002, President Bush released the National Strategy for Homeland Security, a strategic plan
based on the principles of cooperation and partnership. The Presidents plan provides states with a
blueprint to develop and implement programs to enhance security and reduce the threat of terrorism.
Recognizing that state and local governments play important roles in these efforts, the national plan
challenges us to develop interconnected and complementary systems that are reinforcing rather than
duplicative.
Like its national counterpart, the Texas Homeland Security Strategic Plan, is built on partnerships among
local, state and federal agencies, volunteer organizations and the private sector. Our first goal must be to
do everything within our power to prevent a terrorist attack. That is why our effort to coordinate
communication among federal, state and local law enforcement agencies is so vital. We also recognize that
we must have an emergency management and response that is comprehensive, rapid and orderly.
The Texas Homeland Security Strategic Plan ensures the coordinated and comprehensive use of state
resources and federal funding to deter, detect and respond to terrorism, and it provides our state with clear
lines of authority and communication as we work together to accomplish these goals. I have designated a
Director of Homeland Security within my office to ensure the effective coordination of information and
resources. My Director of Homeland Security also will serve as the presiding officer of the Critical
Infrastructure Protection Council that was established by House Bill 9 in the 78th Texas Legislature.
The Texas Homeland Security Strategic Plan builds on the mandates of House Bill 9 and the Presidents
plan to outline the principles that will guide our states homeland security efforts. My office also has
iii
worked closely with the Texas Engineering Extension Service and Regional Councils of Governments to
develop the more detailed implementation steps and measurable objectives contained in Part II of the
state strategy. Part III of the strategy details operational and procedural guidance to implement the
States Emergency Management Plan.
The centerpiece of the Texas strategy is a regional network of interlocking and mutually supporting
counter-terrorism and preparedness programs. Disasters, whether manmade or natural, do not recognize
county lines or regional boundaries. For this reason, we have developed realistic plans that bring together
the many emergency response officials who would be expected to work together should a disaster occur.
The nature of terrorism is to exploit weaknesses in a security system, and terrorists will adjust their means
and methods of attack as we work to make our state and nation more secure. I expect the Texas strategy to
evolve as our state and nation adjust to the ever-changing threat of terrorism. In the battle against
terrorism, there is no time for complacency. I hope you will join me in taking every effort to ensure the
security of our great state.
Sincerely,
Rick Perry
Governor
iv
Texas
Homeland
Security
Strategic
Plan
Part I
Governors Vision
Rick Perry, Governor
January 30, 2004
Executive Summary
Table of Contents
Page 5
President Bushs National Strategy for Homeland Security calls on states and local
governments to implement compatible security strategies. For this reason, Texas
has used the national strategy as a model for developing a statewide plan.
Page 9
The first objective of the Texas Homeland Security Strategic Plan is to prevent a
terrorist attack. The best way to accomplish this is through the receipt,
analysis and dissemination of criminal intelligence.
Page 11
Page 17
The most visible element of the Texas Homeland Security Strategic Plan is the
Regional Response System. The strength of this system comes from interlocking and mutually supportive regional emergency response systems.
Border Security
Page 21
Conclusion
Page 23
The Texas Homeland Security Strategic Plan provides a solid framework for the
state to build on partnerships among local, state and federal agencies, volunteer
organizations and the private sector.
Page 25
Page 32
Page 33
3
Introduction
Information Systems
The Joint Regional Intelligence Exchange System is a digital network connection between the U.S. Department of
Homeland Security and more than 60 law
enforcement partners, who agree to share
information, respond to information requests and conduct intelligence and analysis
missions.
The National Law Enforcement
Telecommunication System (NLETS)
links more than 310,000 law enforcement
and criminal justice offices across the
country. Users are able to exchange
information and alerts in a matter of
seconds. The FBI has used NLETS to
issue alerts regarding terrorist threats to
state law enforcement agencies.
The Texas Law Enforcement
Telecommunication System provides an
electronic link among the states law
enforcement agencies similar to NLETS.
11
Governors Office
Department of Information Resources
Critical Infrastructure
Protection Council
House Bill 9 requires that the Critical
Infrastructure Protection Council include
representatives from:
Governors Office
Department of Agriculture
Office of the Attorney General
General Land Office
Public Utilities Commission
Texas Department of Health
Department of Information Resources
Bioterrorism
Biological weapons present an immense danger to our
state and nation. In the right environment, biological
weapons can multiply, and they can naturally mutate,
frustrating protective measures. Chemical weapons,
for all their horrors, become less lethal as they are
dispersed and diluted. But even the smallest quantities
of disease organisms can be lethal. For example,
botulinum toxin has been described as 3 million times
more potent than the chemical nerve agent sarin.
Texas heath care workers and citizens must be
informed and educated about the potential biological
weapons of terrorism in order to quickly recognize
and respond to an attack. The Texas Department of
Health (TDH) has developed Internet resources,
www.tdh.state.tx.us/bioterrorism, for the public,
health care workers and first responders. TDH also
has created the Health Alert Network to distribute
information statewide to local health professionals and
officials. In addition, the Health Alert Network
ultimately will have the ability to compile a contact
listing for health professionals throughout Texas in
the event that mobilization or contact becomes
necessary. And TDH has enhanced its disease detection
and response capability by establishing the Office of
State Epidemiologist, increasing regional
13
School Safety
Over the past several years, Texas has been a national
leader in school safety. The Texas School Safety Center,
originally organized in
May 1999 after the
Learn more
shooting at Columbine
High School in
Texas School
Colorado, serves as a
Safety Center:
resource to help Texas
www.txssc.swt.edu
schools develop and
im-plement policies
Advanced Law
and programs for a safe
Enforcement
learning environment.
Rapid Response
In 2001, Governor
Training Center:
Perry signed legislation
www.swt.edu/alerrt
to formally establish
the safety center,
and the Governors Criminal Justice Division has
supported the center with approximately $500,000 in
funding each year since 1999.
Agriculture Security
Texas is the nations leading cattle producer and has more
than twice the number of farms of any other state.
Protecting our agricultural interests is important both
to the states economy and the nations food supply.
Airport Security
The Aviation Transportation Act, signed by President
14
15
16
A state-of-the-art State
Operations Center is staffed
around the clock by DEM
employees and personnel from
other relevant agencies. This center, which monitors
routine and emergency events as they occur, is the
primary location from which crisis management and
coordination are accomplished in Texas.
Strategic Planning
17
Texas Task Force I aided the recovery efforts after the attack on the World Trade Center in New York.
Sher man
Han sford
Och il tr ee
Lip scom b
Har tl ey
Moor e
Hutch in son
Rob erts
Hem phill
Ol dh am
Potter
Car son
Gra y
Whe ele r
Dea f S mith
Ran da ll
Armstron g
Don le y
Parme r
Swis her
Cas tro
Brisco e
Chi ld ress
Hal l
Har dem an
Bail ey
Lam b
Fl oyd
Hal e
Motle y
Wil barg er
Cottle
Wich ita
Fo ard
Cla y
Coc hra n
Hoc kle y
Lub bo ck
Cro sby
Dic ken s
King
Baylo r
Knox
Monta gu e
Arche r
Lam ar
Gra yson
Coo ke
Red Riv er
Fa nn in
Del ta
Yoak um
Lynn
Te rry
Kent
Ga rza
Sto ne wa ll
Jack
Den ton
Wise
Colli n
Bowi e
Titu s
Hop kin s Fra nkl in
Morris
Hun t
Cam p
Roc kwa ll
Ga in es
Daw son
Bord en
Scurry
Fi she r
Jon es
Andr ews
Martin
How ard
Mitche ll
Nolan
Ta ylo r
Ta rran t
Parke r
Palo Pin to
Rains
Woo d
Dal la s
Kaufma n Van Zan dt
Hoo d
Lov ing
El Paso
Hud spe th
Win kle r
Ward
Cul be rson
Midlan d
Ector
Cok e
Erath
Bosq ue
Fre esto ne
Ham ilto n
McLe nna n
Mill s
Cra ne
Upto n
Rea ga n
Ree ves
To m Gr een
Irion
Con cho
Maso n
Sutton
Burleso n
Gill esp ie
Val Ve rde
Rea l
Brew ste r
Fa yette
Cal dw ell
Com al
Band era
Uva lde
Ora ng e
Jefferso n
Har ris
Col ora do
Ga lve ston
Lav aca
Ata sco sa
Fri o
Fo rt Be nd
Go nza les
Bexa r
Medi na
Wil son
Za vala
Lib erty
Waller
Cha mbe rs
Gu ad alu pe
Kinn ey
Austin
New ton
Jasp er
Har din
Montg ome ry
Wash in gton
Bastrop
Hays
Kend al l
Tyl er
San Ja cin to
Gri mes
Lee
Tra vis
Blan co
Kerr
Edwa rds
Polk
Wal ker
Brazo s
Willia mso n
Kimb le
Te rrel l
Presidi o
Madi son
Mila m
Burn et
Lla no
Sabi ne
Ange li naSan Au gu stine
Hou ston
Trinity
Rob ertso n
Mena rd
Cro ckett
Shelby
Nac ogd och es
Leo n
Fa lls
Pano la
Che rok ee
Lim eston e
Bell
Peco s
Ande rso n
Cor yell
McCu llo ch
Jeff D av is
Rus k
Nav arro
Hil l
Har riso n
Smith
Hen de rson
Brow n
Colema n
Gre gg
Elli s
Some rvel l
Com anc he
Run ne ls
Joh nso n
Eastla nd
Calla ha n
Cas s
Mari on
Ups hur
Wha rto n
Brazo ria
De Wi tt
Jacks on
Karn es
Matag ord a
Victori a
Mave rick
Go liad
Dim mit
McMul le n
La Sa lle
Cal ho un
Live Oa k
Bee
Refu gio
Aran sas
San Pa tricio
Duv al
Web b
Jim We lls
Nue ces
Kleb erg
Jim Ho gg
Za pa ta
Broo ks
Kene dy
Sta rr
Hid algo
Wil lac y
Cam ero n
19
20
Border Security
Texas has a dozen seaports and
more than 1,000 miles of inland
waterways responsible for more
than 17 percent of the gross state
product. Our state also is home
to 14 border crossings more
than any other state including
seven of the nations 10 busiest
southern border crossings.
Ensuring the security of our
international border and ports
while allowing the smooth and
efficient flow of commerce is an
issue of critical importance to
Texas and our nation.
21
22
Conclusion
Sept. 11 Memorial
On Sept. 11, 2003, Governor Perry unveiled
the Sept. 11 Memorial at the Texas State
Cemetery. The memorial, which features
two beams recovered from the World Trade
Center, is dedicated to the Texans killed in
the attacks and in the war on terror.
We must do more than dedicate a
monument, the Governor said. We must
dedicate our hearts and minds to the cause
that continues on the cause of freedom.
We must maintain our resolve and our
purpose to rid this world of the terrorist
element. We must not waver. We must not
retreat. We must remain strong in honor of
those who died that day and on behalf of
generations to come.
23
24
Appendix A
A 1:
Use state warning systems to communicate warning and safety information to the public.
Progress: Enhancements have been made to the states basic warning systems, and the Governors
Division of Emergency Management (DEM) has adopted the federal color-based warning system
announced by federal Homeland Security Director Tom Ridge on March 22, 2002. This color-coded
system, along with any state alerts, can be found on the states new homeland security Internet site,
www.texashomelandsecurity.com. The Commission on State Emergency Communication also is
reviewing funding requirements to implement a reverse 911 system, and the Texas Department of
Transportation is designing an advanced bridge warning system for use on selected bridges that would
alert bridge users when a bridge is out.
A 2:
Encourage public service messages and establish a web page to inform the public about what to
do in the event of a terrorist threat.
Progress: The states new Internet site, www.texashomelandsecurity.com, provides a one-stop resource
to the public for terrorist threat advisories and safety tips. The site also will help local officials by
providing updates on the statewide strategy, access to technical assistance and links to additional resources.
In addition, DEM has expanded its Internet site, www.demwmd.net, to include information about
terrorism awareness, prevention and preparedness. The Texas Department of Health (TDH) also has
developed an Internet site that addresses bioterrorism issues, incident response planning for mass
casualty and medical emergencies.
A 3:
Require cell phone companies to maintain portable towers for use in emergencies.
Progress: While this a federal issue under the authority of the Federal Communications Commission
(FCC), the state has worked with the FCC and cellular telephone companies to ensure that portable
towers will be available if the need arises.
25
A 4:
Develop emergency training for schools on actions to take in the event of a terrorist threat.
Progress: The Texas School Safety Center, located at Southwest Texas State University, has been
funded by the Governors Criminal Justice Division since 1999 to provide information and training
for emergency situations within Texas schools. In addition, the Governors Office also recently approved
a $500,000 grant to train more than 600 Texas law enforcement officers at the new Advanced Law
Enforcement Rapid Response Training Center in San Marcos. This new center will train officers to
handle and diffuse crisis situations.
A 5:
Establish a 1-800 Call Center and e-mail address to allow the public to report certain activity.
Progress: The Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS) has a telephone number to allow the public
to report activity that may be terrorist related. The number is (800) 252-5402. In addition, DPS has
posted e-mail addresses for its Counter-Terrorism Intelligence Unit at www.demwmd.net.
A 6:
Texas law enforcement agencies have access to the National Law Enforcement Telecommunications
System (NLETS), giving the state instant access to federal alerts and information. The FBI has
used NLETS to issue alerts regarding terrorist threats. The Texas Law Enforcement
Telecommunications System provides an electronic link among the states law enforcement agencies.
The Texas Department of Health has implemented the Health Alert Network. (For more
information, see progress note for recommendation C 3.)
The Texas Education Agency has established an Internet-based network that can deliver immediate
alerts to the states 1,200 school districts.
B 1:
Support funding of additional personnel and training for the Department of Public Safety for
intelligence and law enforcement efforts.
Progress: The Department of Public Safety has enhanced its intelligence and law enforcement efforts
through an internal reorganization that added resources to these important efforts.
B 2:
Request federal authorization and funding for a second Civil Support Team for Texas.
Progress: Governor Perry has requested federal authorization for a second Civil Support Team; however,
this request has not yet been approved. The Governors Office will continue to pursue this request.
B 3:
Identify an organization to set minimum standards for emergency response equipment for
specific purposes.
Progress: The Department of Justice, as do most federal and state agencies, sets minimum standards
for equipment purchased with funding obtained through that agency.
B 4:
Seek legislation to require appropriate physical documentation to be maintained for all persons
who change their legal name.
Progress: Such legislation failed to pass the 78th Texas Legislature.
26
B 5: Support funding for additional personnel for the Governors Division of Emergency Management
for field personnel to support local government efforts to plan and train for disasters.
Progress: See progress note for recommendation B 1. The Division of Emergency Management is
part of the Texas Department of Public Safety.
B 6:
Develop standards and a process for the certification of public and private Weapon of Mass
Destruction training courses.
Progress: The Texas Engineering Extension Service (TEEX) has developed a voluntary certification
process. Legislation would be necessary to require certification of training courses offered through the
private sector. First responders are encouraged to take courses that are recommended and preferred by
TEEX and DEM to ensure that training received conforms to Texas counter-terrorism strategies.
B 7:
Ensure that appropriate training resources are available for first response efforts.
Progress: The Governors Criminal Justice Division awarded a $1 million grant to DEM on October
10, 2001, for first responder terrorism and preparedness training. More than 10,000 Texans received
training under this grant and training exercises have been conducted in Texas City, Galveston, Freeport,
Hidalgo and Brazoria counties, the Port of Houston, Del Rio, Beaumont, Abilene and Conroe.
Additional exercises are planned for fiscal year 2004. In addition, a separate $230,000 grant to the
DPS Intelligence Division trained 2,808 first responders in fiscal year 2003 and will train more officers
in fiscal year 2004. Other training efforts include:
B 8:
TEEX provides first responder training for EMS, firefighters, hospitals and public works
employees through an interagency contract with the Texas Department of Health.
Texas Parks and Wildlife Department is using FBI counter-terrorism training for its personnel.
The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, formerly the Texas Natural resources
Conservation Commission, is conducting emergency response training for agencies and
localities within its areas of responsibility.
The Governors Criminal Justice Division has approved a $500,000 grant to train more
than 600 Texas law enforcement officers at the new Advanced Law Enforcement Rapid
Response Training Center in San Marcos.
The Governors Office is working with DEM to develop a Texas First Responder
Preparedness Program in anticipation of federal funding to states and communities. The
states first responder program is being developed to work within the framework of the
Texas Homeland Security Strategic Plan.
Request all health licensees to complete at least one hour of continuing education requirements
each year on reporting medical events and responding to terrorism.
Progress: House Bill 1483 requires nurses to complete continuing education in bioterrorism response.
Other state agencies are adding similiar requirements by rule.
B 9: Expand the role of the National Guard at Texas airports and deploy them at selected private and
government critical infrastructures during periods of high alert.
Progress: The Governor extended the National Guards presence at airports on March 7, 2002,
through May 2002. Almost 400 members of the Texas National Guard provided security assistance
at 26 Texas airports. In most airports, the Guard remained deployed through May 10, 2002. The
Aviation Transportation Act, signed by President Bush on November 19, 2001, now gives federal
authorities control over airport security.
TEXAS HOMELAND SECURITY STRATEGIC PLAN - PART I - GOVERNORS VISION
27
B10:
Request all Standard Metropolitan Statistical Areas develop plans for designating hazardous
material routes.
Progress: State law requires hazardous material routes for cities of greater than 750,000 in population;
however, cities with populations less than 750,000 may choose to designate routes. The Governor
encourages local and regional governments to work with TxDOT to voluntarily designate hazardous
materials routes. In addition, the Governors Trans Texas Corridor will create hazardous material
routes outside major cities.
B11: Develop expected security standards for industries that have identified critical infrastructure
assets and require such industries to submit security impact reports.
Progress: The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) has conducted risk assessments
of dams and public drinking water facilities. The Public Utility Commission surveyed security measures
taken by 24 electric industry entities since September 11, 2001, and all reported heightened security
and additional communication with employees regarding information security. In addition, TxDOT
is developing site-specific emergency response plans for critical bridges.
B12: Support local efforts to require that new large special events facilities build emergency response
rooms.
Progress: This is a local zoning issue; however, the Governors Office will be providing information
to the states 24 regional councils of government to help local officials enhance security.
B13: Support local efforts to require that new large special events facilities build enhanced security
surrounding heating-venting and air-conditioning, water and wastewater systems.
Progress: See progress note for recommendation B12.
B14: Develop a plan to expand real-time monitoring of drinking water supplies to test for chemical
and biological agents that could be used as weapons.
Progress: The Governors Controlling Our Destiny water initiative takes steps to ensure the safety
of the states water resources. The governor has directed Texas Parks and Wildlife Department law
enforcement officers to police water supply facilities and dams. In addition, TCEQ is working with
the Environmental Protection Agency to obtain grants for projects related to drinking water protection
and quality assurance.
B15: Improve the research and development associated with detecting, deterring and responding to
terrorism.
Progress: Funding for research into homeland security will come primarily from the federal level;
however, the Governors Office supports the efforts of Texas universities to pursue these funding
opportunities. In July, Texas universities signed a memorandum of understanding to develop a proposal
for becoming a research center for homeland security. This new consortium will combine the strengths
of the Texas A&M University System, the University of Texas System, Texas Tech University System
and the University of Houston System in applications for federal research funding.
B16: Determine whether certain highly toxic chemical agents can be added to the existing air quality
monitoring network.
Progress: TCEQ already monitors air quality in Texas major metropolitan areas and will work with
the federal Environmental Protection Agency to determine the feasibility of monitoring for additional
airborne chemical agents.
28
C 1: Provide the Governor with a list of local jurisdictions that did not complete the jurisdictional
assessments of threat and vulnerability.
Progress: DEM and TEEX have conducted risk assessments within Texas communities to examine
potential risks to infrastructure and citizens. DEM and TEEX also have identified those localities that
did not submit data for the risk assessments. In addition, the state has developed planning standards,
sample planning products and instruments that can be used by local officials to develop response and
prevention capabilities.
C 2:
Assess, identify and provide additional training and resources that may be needed by local
emergency response entities.
Progress: See progress note for recommendation B 7.
C 3: Support the Texas Department of Healths recent plan to improve response capabilities in the
event of an anthrax or bio-terrorism event.
Progress: Governor Perry authorized the transfer of $12.2 million in February 2002 to TDH for
these activities. TDH has created the Health Alert Network to distribute information statewide to
local health professionals and officials. The Health Alert Network also will compile a contact listing
for health professionals throughout Texas in the event that mobilization or contact becomes necessary.
In addition, TDH has enhanced its disease detection and response capability by establishing the Office
of State Epidemiologist, increasing regional epidemiology staff, developing guidelines for team
responses, purchasing lab and testing supplies, and expanding its lab capacity. TDH also has received
$51.4 million from the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for public health preparedness
and bioterrorism response.
D 1: Establish a coordinating council to develop a plan for early detection and streamlining responses
to bioterrorism.
Progress: TDH is appointing a Preparedness Coordinating Council to advise TDH and oversee the
coordinated planning and implementation of preparedness and response activities. Recommendations
for improving the surveillance of disease occurrence and the education and training of health care
professionals also are being implemented.
D 2:
D 3: Review and update plans for quarantine, hospitalization and evacuation procedures in the event
of a terrorist attack.
Progress: TDH is updating its epidemic plans that will then be coordinated with the Centers for
Disease Control (CDC) and the states medical community. CDC has indicated pharmaceutical
companies have produced and stockpiled vaccines in preparation for bioterrorism attacks. TDH also
has established a Preparedness Coordinating Council. This high-level committee will provide advice
on major preparedness issues.
D 4: Develop a statewide plan to administer a mass vaccination and chemoprophylaxis.
Progress: See progress note under recommendation D 3.
D 5: Continue funding the Health Alert Network.
Progress: See progress note under recommendation C 3.
TEXAS HOMELAND SECURITY STRATEGIC PLAN - PART I - GOVERNORS VISION
29
D 6: Request all health licensing organizations and agencies to require licensees to provide business
fax numbers and e-mail addresses.
Progress: See progress note under recommendation C 3.
D 7: Establish 10 Regional HazMat WMD Teams (Hazardous Materials Weapons of Mass Destruction
Teams).
Progress: DEM, TxDOT and the Texas Engineering Extension Service are preparing their budget
request for the next legislative session, and consideration of this issue is part of that process. However,
there may be potential to fund regional hazardous materials teams out of anticipated federal funds.
D 8: Monitor the development of communication interoperability for first responders.
Progress: The Governors Office and DPS continue to monitor an initiative of the Texas Sheriffs
Association to develop a strategy to address the ability of emergency responders to communicate
across agency lines. While the long-term solution probably will include the conversion to a 700 MHz
system, that option would require a substantial financial commitment. As an interim approach, the
Texas Sheriffs Association is investigating the use of radio switchers to integrate systems.
D 9: Establish a centralized point of contact for intelligence information involving critical infrastructure.
Progress: The DPS Counter Terrorism Intelligence Unit is the statewide centralized point of contact
for intelligence gathering and training, information sharing, threat assessment and investigative response
to terrorist threats or attacks within the state. The unit takes calls and tips at (800) 252-5402 from
local law enforcement officers as well as the public.
D10: Support efforts regarding infrastructure protection and business continuity planning to ensure
the continuation of government services.
Progress: The states Department of Information Resources has created a State Computer Security
Group that is reviewing and enhancing the states computer security. In addition, Attorney General
John Cornyns report on cyber-security is being reviewed for possible further action.
D11: Support legislation to expand the current Good Samaritan Law to protect industrial response
teams responding to emergencies at neighboring facilities.
Progress: House Bill 9 includes provisions to protect workers responding to emergencies from civil
liability.
E 1:
Review compacts with neighboring states to ensure they address resource sharing before, during
and after terrorist incidents.
Progress: DEM currently coordinates with bordering states through compacts established by the
State of Texas.
E 2:
Initiate dialogue with Mexico to develop protocols for the sharing of resources and intelligence
on matters pertaining to terrorist incidents.
Progress: The Texas Secretary of States Office and DEM have begun this process.
E 3: Request the federal Office of Homeland Security to establish standardized terrorism classification
levels and assign minimum expected levels of response by industry and government.
Progress: DEMs Internet site conforms to the federal threat level classifications, which include suggested
protective measures. Consideration is being given to requesting regional and local governments to
formally adopt the system for the sake of uniformity and clear communication.
30
E 4:
Request the federal Office of Homeland Security ensure equal spending along Texas/Mexico
border as along the U.S./Canada border.
Progress: Governor Perry announced in June, 2002, that Texas will receive $40.8 million from the
U.S. Department of Transportation to build one-stop border inspection facilities designed to house
both federal and state inspectors.
E 5:
Direct the Texas Department of Transportation to prepare an assessment of assets and needs at
Texas ports of entry to aid the Governor in seeking funding for border security.
Progress: The Texas Department of Transportation is currently performing this assessment. Texas
ports have received more than $37 million in federal funding since September 2001 to enhance security,
including $2.3 million for strategic deployment terminals at the Port of Corpus Christi and $1.8 million
for a command center and expanded security assessment at the Port of Houston.
E 6:
Request the federal Office of Homeland Security investigate initiating limited background checks
for persons employed in critical infrastructure.
Progress: Requires federal legislation. The Governors Office will work with the appropriate federal
agencies to enhance the states security measures and ensure that the states strategic plan is compatible
with President Bushs federal plan.
E 7:
Request the federal Office of Homeland Security to coordinate risk management analysis among
federal agencies and publish a tool for government and industry to evaluate their infrastructure
risks.
Progress: The Governors Office will continue to work with the appropriate federal agencies to
enhance the states security measures and will form partnerships with both the public and private
sectors to help assess the states ability to protect critical state infrastructure.
E 8:
Coordinate with the federal Office of Homeland Security to create a biological agents registry.
Progress: It is expected that a registry of biological agents will be required at the federal level. The
Governors Office will work with the Office of Homeland Security to ensure that the state fully
complies with all federal guidelines regarding such a registry.
31
Appendix B
Appendix C
33
Texas
Homeland
Security
Strategic
Plan
Part II
Goals and Objectives
Rick Perry, Governor
January 30, 2004
Table of Contents
Page 1
Vision
Page 1
Focus
Page 1
Coordination
Page 2
Description of Jurisdictions
Page 2
Assessment Process
Page 2
Page 3
Vulnerability Assessment
Page 4
Agricultural Assessment
Page 5
Page 7
Organization
Page 7
Equipment
Page 8
Training
Page 8
Exercises
Page 9
The Strategy
Strategy Organization
Page 11
Prevention Goal
Page 11
Response Goals
Page 12
Recovery Goal
Page 20
Response Goal
Page 22
Recovery Goal
Page 23
Evaluation Plan
ii
Page 25
Page 25
Reported Information
Page 25
Chapter 1
Introduction
Purpose
Vision
Prevent Terrorist Attacks Within Texas
The states first priority will be to detect and deter
potential attacks by enhancing coordination and
communication among state and local law enforcement
agencies and developing effective partnerships with
federal, public and private agencies and organizations.
Focus
To accomplish the strategic vision, the strategy is
organized around the following critical mission areas:
intelligence and warning
protecting critical infrastructure
emergency preparedness, response and recovery
border security
Response relies on the Incident Command System.
Whenever applicable, Texas will use an all hazards
approach that improves the ability to respond to
terrorism incidents as well as other disasters. For years,
Texas has had a fully-integrated Emergency
Management System (EMS) designed to prepare,
respond and recover. Please refer to Part III -State
Emergency Management Plan of the Texas Homeland
Security Strategic Plan for details on the operation of
this system. Texas Emergency Management System
recognizes that local officials are best able to make
decisions about disaster preparedness, response, and
recovery. The Texas Homeland Security Strategic Plan is
built around that premise and emphasizes the
importance of grassroots input and preparedness
Coordination
Description of Jurisdictions
The jurisdictions of Texas are the legally recognized
counties and incorporated municipalities of the state.
The additions to the basic definition for the purpose of
this strategy include the three Indian tribes located in
Texas and the Dallas Fort Worth airport. Coverage of
the entire state is a natural outgrowth of the involvement
of all 24 Regional Councils of Government together
with the jurisdiction definition.
Assessment Process
The SAA sent letters to each county judge and each
mayor of an incorporated municipality inviting them to
participate in the assessment and to designate a point of
contact. Jurisdictions began entering data in January
2003 on a Texas website that mirrored the information
that would later be available on the ODP site. TEEX
used the assessment results for the 2002, 2003 and 2003
II State Homeland Security Grant programs. The site
was reopened to allow jurisdictions that had not
previously completed the assessment to complete it for
the 2004 State Homeland Security Program.
Chapter 2
Population
Participated in Assessment
928
20,730,740
525
1,204,156
Total
1453
21,934,896
Threat Assessment
One component of the assessment process was a threat assessment that resulted in a threat rating for each jurisdiction
that ranged from low to high. Just over 14.5% of the jurisdictions that participated in the assessment received a
high threat rating.
Threats
Number of Jurisdictions in the Following Threat Rating Categories
Low
(Rating of 1)
614
Moderate
(Rating of 2-4)
179
High
(Rating of 5-10)
135
As part of the threat assessment, each jurisdiction identified the number of potential threat elements (PTEs) that had
been identified within their jurisdiction. A PTE is defined as any group or individual in which there are allegations or
information indicating a possibility of the unlawful use of force or violence, specifically the utilization of a WMD, against
persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of a
specific motivation or goal, possibly political or social in nature. The 928 participating jurisdictions in Texas identified a
total of 2,052 PTEs. It is unclear the extent to which this number may include duplicative reporting of a single PTE
by multiple jurisdictions.
Texas Homeland Security Strategic Plan - Part II - Goals and Objectives
Threats
Total Potential Threat Elements (PTEs) identified
in Texas
2,052
Identified PTEs
242
Biological
115
Radiological
71
Nuclear
Explosive
254
In addition to reporting the number of PTEs within their areas, jurisdictions were asked to assess whether any of the
PTEs in their area had WMD capabilities in any of the five categories or types of terrorism incidents Chemical,
Biological, Radiological, Nuclear and Explosive.
Threats
History of Suspected CBRNE Incidents and Criminal Incidents
Chemical
9,064
CBRNE Incidents
Determined Criminal
274
Biological
7,751
171
Radiological
53
Nuclear
Explosive
5,674
1,601
TOTAL
22,548
2,052
CBRNE Incidents
As a final component of the Threat Assessment, jurisdictions were asked to report the number of Chemical,
Biological, Radiological, Nuclear or Explosive (CBRNE) incidents that required dispatch of response assets in their
jurisdiction between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2002. Jurisdictions reported which of these incidents were
determined to have been criminal.
Vulnerability Assessment
Jurisdictions that completed the assessment conducted a vulnerability analysis. The vulnerability assessment resulted
in a vulnerability rating for each jurisdiction that ranged from low to high.
Vulnerability
Number of Jurisdictions in the Following Vulnerability
Rating Categories
Low
(Rating of 1-5)
Moderate
(Rating of 6-9)
High
(Rating of 10-12)
488
307
135
As part of the Vulnerability Assessment, jurisdictions reported on the number of legal hazardous CBRNE (Chemical,
Biological, Radiological, Nuclear and Explosive) sites within their areas.
Vulnerability
Legal Hazardous Sites
Reported by Jurisdictions
Hazard
Number of Sites
Chemical
36,477
Biological
940
Nuclear/Radiological
1,279
Explosive
2,573
Total
41,269
Agricultural Assessment
Agriculture is the second largest industry in Texas after petroleum with annual cash receipts of more than $12.6
billion dollars. In addition to the concerns for animal and plant well being, a primary impact of an agroterrorism act
is the effect it could have on trade. Given the magnitude and diversity of the Texas agricultural industry, the long
border shared with 4 states of Mexico, and 4 states of the U.S., and a traditional marketing practice for agriculture,
protecting this critical infrastructure represents a major challenge. Even though Texas probably ranks among the best
in agricultural emergency response, there are still major vulnerabilies. Texas chose to do the Agricultural assessment at
the State level, based on the fact that both animal and plant emergency responses are coordinated at the State level.
The assessment was completed by representatives of the Texas Animal Health Commission, the Texas Department of
Agriculture, the United States Department of Agriculture and the Texas A&M College of Veterinary Medicine. Texas
also recognizes that diseases intended against agriculture could also be zoonotic or could be engineered to infect
humans as well as livestock.
The State Agricultural Working Group completed the ODP developed worksheets for typical agriculture facilities in
the state. The results are shown below.
Type of Potential
Agricultural Target
Score
on Worksheet
35
12
Cotton
34
12
Poultry
31
11
Nursery/Greenhouse
30
11
Cereal Grains
29
10
Swine
29
10
Fruits/Vegetables
26
25
The planning scenario for animal incidents was a Foot and Mouth disease outbreak at a large feedlot in West Texas.
The planning scenario used for the fruit and vegetable industry was the introduction of the Mediterranean fruit fly
into the citrus region of South Texas.
The potential magnitude of an agricultural incident is seen in the planning figures. Foot and Mouth at a large West
Texas feedlot could result in 500 dead animals with up to 65,000 symptomatic, plus an additional 30,000 exposed
but not showing symptoms and up to 500,000 possibly exposed. Introduction of the Mediterranean fruit fly could
lead to 200 contaminated trees with up to 3.3 million trees possibly contaminated.
Jurisdiction Prioritization
Jurisdictions are prioritized within each Council of Governments (COG) region using the results of the jurisdiction
assessment and the COG categorization of regional capabilities of each jurisdiction in the region. The prioritization
scores are used to determine allocation of a portion of available resources. The Regional Councils of Governments
determine the allocation for the remaining portion using the assessment result plus consideration of projects and
needs for the region.
Chapter 3
Planning
Jurisdictions reported whether or not that had a current emergency Operations Plan (EOP) and a Terrorism Incident
Annex (TIA). Non participating jurisdictions were not credited with having a plan or TIA.
Planning
Jurisdictions with both an
Emergency Operations Plan (EOP) and a Terrorism Incident Annex (TIA)
Percentage of Participating Jurisdictions with EOP and TIA
52.26%
33.38%
Organization
Jurisdictions were asked to report the number of specialty response teams that are operational within their area. Each
jurisdiction also reported if these teams receive and/or provide mutual aid to other jurisdictions.
Organization
Emergency Response Teams reported in the State,
and Jurisdictions Receiving/Providing Mutual Aid
Type of Team
Number of Teams
Number Receiving
Aid
Number Providing
Aid
HazMat
308
640
192
Decontamination
Teams
487
586
171
SWAT
353
630
245
Bomb Squad
71
568
58
Technical Rescue
596
590
244
395
548
177
Heavy Rescue
219
541
127
MMRS
27
409
39
265
528
129
Number of
Personnel
per Team
100
Equipment
Jurisdictions were required to assess their equipment inventories and needs in several equipment categories: CBRNE
Logistical Support, CBRNE Rescue, Decontamination, Detection, Explosive Device Mitigation & Remediation,
Interoperable Communications, Medical Supplies Pharmaceuticals, Personal Protective and Physical Security
Enhancement. Because the Texas assessment began before the inclusion of additional items in the Authorized
Equipment List (AEL), the assessment reflects information on equipment authorized on the 2002 AEL. In each
equipment area, jurisdictions identified the number of pieces of equipment needed and the number on hand.
Equipment
Summary of Jurisdiction Equipment Shortfall:
Equipment
Category
Value of
Equipment
Required
Value of
Equipment
On-Hand
Value of
Equipment
Shortfall
% of
Value
Met
Equipment
Required
Equipment
On-Hand
Equipment
Shortfall
% Need
Met
34,601
454
34,147
1.31%
$351,825,524
$8,170,203
$343,655,321
2.32%
5,247
1,150
4,097
21.92%
$86,741,000
$16,828,000
$69,913,000
19.4%
2,143,836
32,455
2,111,381
1.51%
$112,207,512
$2,514,708
$109,692,804
2.24%
137,600
8,977
128,623
6.52%
$88,881,648
$5,205,185
$83,676,463
5.86%
Explosive Device
Mitigation &
Remediation
24,553
3,295
21,258
13.42%
$95,470,787
$7,589,290
$87,881,497
7.95%
Interoperable
Communications
227,569
78,424
149,145
34.46%
$418,018,066
$155,129,045
$262,889,021
37.11%
Medical Supplies
Pharmaceuticals
2,751,929
605,140
2,146,789
21.99%
4132,241,336
$24,299,162
$107,942,173
18.37%
Personal
Protective
931,160
119,807
811,353
12.87%
$191,156,416
$46,050112
$145,106,034
24.09%
Physical Security
Enhancement
106,895
45,556
61,339
42.62%
$1,193,012,500
$66,090,500
$1,126,922,000
5.54%
6,363,390
895,258
5,468,132
14.07%
$2,669,554,788
$331,876,205
$2,337,678,583
12.43%
CBRNE Logistical
Support
CBRNE Rescue
Decontamination
Detection
TOTAL
Training
Jurisdictions reported their training needs by response discipline in ten areas: law enforcement (LE), emergency
medical services (EMS), emergency management (EM), fire service (FS), HazMat (HZ), public works (PW),
government administrative (GA), public safety communications (PSC), health care (HC) and public health (PH).
Training
Training needs by Training Level, by Discipline Percent Requiring Training
Discipline
Awareness
LE
EMS
EM
FS
HZ
PW
GA
PSC
HC
PH
All
58.16% 40.94% 62.29% 43.24% 29.44% 87.15% 86.44% 73.69% 86.67% 66.98% 73.92%
Performance 84.63% 68.41% 67.28% 61.81% 33.77% 92.35% 88.99% 89.46% 91.67% 90.97% 80.21%
(Defensive)
Performance 88.88% 87.04% 71.76% 85.74% 55.94% 90.32% 87.18% 88.37% 86.52% 56.11% 83.62%
(Offensive)
73.34% 83.69% 74.45% 75.31% 71.23% 82.45% 90.66% 76.69% 93.97% 47.49% 80.28%
Planning/
Management
Exercises
Finally, jurisdictions reported the number of exercises needed to maintain WMD response capability. The assessment
allowed jurisdictions to indicate the scale of the exercise needed, whether tabletop, functional or full scale.
Exercises
Number/type of Exercises
Requested by Jurisdictions
Type
Number
Requested
Full Scale
220
Functional
291
Tabletop
687
10
Chapter 4
Strategy Organization
Part II of the Texas Homeland Security Strategic Plan is organized to address goals in three areas prevention,
response and recovery as prescribed by the US Department of Homeland Securitys Office for Domestic
Preparedness. One or more goals are identified within each of these three areas. For each identified goal, one or more
objectives are presented in possible solution areas that include planning, organization, equipment, training and
exercises. For each identified objective, specific implementation steps are outlined, which comprise the
implementation plan for the strategy.
Prevention Goal
1. Goal: Enhance Intelligence and Warning
1.1. Planning Objectives
1.1.1.
1.1.2.
1.1.3.
11
1.1.3.2. Implementation Step: Each COG region identifies priority locations for 911
redundancies and uses the information as a potential factor in regional funding
allocation.
1.1.4.
1.2.2.
12
Response Goals
2. Goal: Provide the resources to maintain a comprehensive state emergency management
program and support local emergency management programs.
2.1. Planning Objectives:
2.1.1.
By Oct. 1 of each year, the SAA reviews the currency and completeness of the Office for
Domestic Preparedness developed assessments of risk, capabilities and needs submitted by
jurisdictions. The SAA ensures that the assessments cover at least 90% of the states population.
2.1.1.1. Implementation Step: Update the list of Texas Jurisdictions by Feb. 1 of each year to
account for any changes due to incorporation or annexation.
2.1.1.2. Implementation Step: Provide newly-created jurisdictions the opportunity to
complete the assessment by March 1 of each year.
2.1.1.3. Implementation Step: Require newly-created jurisdictions that want to participate in
the State Homeland Security Grant Program to complete the assessment by June 1 of
each year.
2.1.2.
By October 1 of each year each COG ensures that the regional evaluation of jurisdiction
regional capabilities is complete and accurate for all jurisdictions with completed assessments in
the COGs region.
2.1.2.1. Implementation Step: Complete the regional assessment update for newly-created
jurisdictions and update regional assessments between June 1 and Step 30 of each
year.
2.1.3.
2.1.4.
2.1.5.
By October 1 of each year complete a review of the status of state and local emergency
planning, and provide planning profiles to local governments and state and federal agencies.
2.1.5.1. Implementation Step: A statewide updated report of jurisdiction planning status is
completed by Oct. 1 of each year by each COG and by the DEM.
2.1.6.
Provide emergency planning guidance and assistance to local governments and state agencies.
2.1.6.1. Implementation Step: The DEM continues to provide planning tools in the form of
samples and templates to local jurisdictions.
13
2.1.6.2. Implementation Step: Each COG works with jurisdictions in the region to assist in
plan completion, update, or enhancement.
2.1.7.
By October 1, 2004, identify any improvements needed in the system to provide hazard
information and emergency preparedness and response guidance to local officials and the
general public through multiple means of communication.
2.1.7.1. Implementation Step: The DEM identifies state-level requirements to provide
information to the local level and determines any additional resource requirements.
By October 1, 2004 the DEM, in coordination with other state agencies, will identify any
additional state emergency teams required and resources necessary to establish and maintain
state emergency teams and specialized response and recovery resources. The DEM will also
develop plans and procedures for activation, and use of those resources by October 1, 2005.
2.2.2.
By October 1 of each year, the DEM will identify resource requirements to train, equip, and
deploy liaison personnel to gather information, advise and assist local officials, and coordinate
requests for state assistance during emergencies.
2.2.2.1. The DEM identifies total requirements.
2.2.2.2. The DEM identifies and shortfalls that would impact the liaison program.
2.2.3.
By October 1 of each year, determine the funding requirements to support local emergency
management organizations in their effort to carry out emergency planning, training, and
exercise activities.
2.2.3.1. The DEM determines amounts needed, identifies jurisdictions to receive assistance,
and determines funding sources by October 1 of each year.
Complete an analysis of requirements to equip, operate, and enhance the capability of state
emergency facilities to monitor and analyze threats, issue warnings to government officials, key
industries, and the public by October 1 of each year.
2.3.1.1. Implementation step: The DEM coordinates with other state agencies to determine
the requirements for state facilities.
2.3.2.
By October 1, the DEM reviews the resource requirements to ensure the State can mobilize,
deploy, and direct state emergency response and recovery resources to support local emergency
operations.
2.3.3.
14
2.3.4.
By April 1, 2004, fully integrate the Homeland Defense Equipment Utilization Reuse (HDER)
and other programs to provide radiological monitoring instruments to local governments and
state agencies, maintain such equipment, and provide training in its use.
2.3.4.1. The SAA fully integrates the HDER program.
2.3.4.2. The DEM continues management of other available programs for radiological
equipment and training.
2.3.5.
By June 1, 2004; local jurisdictions have sample formats to assist in the loaning of equipment
between jurisdictions or to private facilities such as hospitals.
2.3.5.1. The SAA works with the State Attorney Generals Office to develop the samples.
2.3.5.2. The SAA distributes the information through the Councils of Governments to local
jurisdictions.
By October 1 of each year DEM identifies resources requirements to carry out a comprehensive
emergency management training program for local and state emergency responders and officials
and volunteers active in emergency operations. Ensure critiques are conducted of all training.
2.4.2.
By October 1, 2004 complete a plan for developing and conducting specialized training
relating to terrorism and WMD, emergency planning, incident management and EOC
operations, and emergency response and recovery operations.
2.4.2.1. Implementation step: This objective relates closely to training objectives found under
goal 3 and will require close coordination between DEM, TEEX and the Councils of
Governments.
2.4.3.
Assist local governments and state agencies in designing, conducting and evaluating exercises
and maintain a database of exercise accomplishment. Provide periodic reports of exercise
accomplishments in accordance with existing state requirements.
2.5.2.
3. Goal: Improve the capability of local governments to prepare for and respond to terrorist
and other hazardous incidents by providing suitable training for emergency responders.
3.1. Training Objectives
3.1.1.
Maintain a listing of state, local, and federal courses to include information on when they are
scheduled on an easily assessable web site by June 30, 2004.
3.1.1.1. Implementation Step: TEEX and DEM coordinate and select WEB site to use by
March 1, 2004.
15
3.1.1.2. Implementation Step: Each COG provides listing of local courses by May 30, 2004.
3.1.1.3. Implementation Step: DEM provides listing of state courses.
3.1.1.4. Implementation Step: TEEX provides listing of Federal Courses.
3.1.2.
3.1.3.
3.1.4.
By Oct. 1, 2004 develop a plan for the development of a standardized curriculum of specialized
training, pertinent to various responder groups, that could be offered on a recurring basis.
3.1.4.1. Implementation Step: TEEX and DEM, working in coordination with representatives
of emergency responder groups, identify existing ODP and other developed training
that would meet training needs.
3.1.4.2. Implementation Step: Identify additional curriculum requirements.
3.1.5.
By Oct. 1, 2004, currently available WMD courses will be evaluated for eligibility for
professional certification and continuing education credit. All courses added after Oct. 1, 2004
will be evaluated for eligibility prior to release.
3.1.6.
Awareness level training to ODP standards, for all disciplines, is available within each COG
region by February 15, 2005.
3.1.6.1. Implementation Step: Each COG identifies training academies, junior colleges, or
other training facilities that have the infrastructure and staff to present WMD
training.
3.1.6.2. Implementation Step: TEEX will provide curriculum and instructor certification for
the ODP developed courses.
16
4. Goal: Plan and conduct a systematic emergency exercise program using terrorism/WMD
scenarios to test plans and procedures and evaluate the adequacy of equipment and training
for local and state emergency responders and officials.
4.1. Exercise Objectives
4.1.1.
Publish a multi-year exercise schedule for local-state and local-state-federal emergency exercises
by October 1 of each year.
4.1.2.
4.1.3.
4.1.4.
By October 1, 2005, provide a self-contained exercise in a box package for jurisdictions that
want to conduct practice exercises or additional exercises at a level less than a functional
exercise.
4.1.5.
Beginning in June 2004, ensure that the Metropolitan Medical Response System and Public
Health Teams are incorporated into exercises.
5. Goal: Provide resources and assistance to Counties, Cities, and Tribal jurisdictions, to
establish and maintain a statewide interoperable radio communication system that is
accessible by local, regional, state, and federal responding agencies when needed.
5.1. Planning Objectives
5.1.1.
Identify current radio systems frequency, digital, analog, in each region by Oct. 1, 2004.
5.1.1.1. Implementation Step: Each COG collects the information on the jurisdictions in the
region.
5.1.2.
The DPS has a plan to ensure ability of DPS to communicate with local jurisdictions by
February 1, 2005.
5.1.2.1. Implementation Step: COG prepared listing of current systems in each region are
provided to DPS by Nov. 1, 2004.
5.1.2.2. Implementation Step: DPS identifies the best methods and equipment for
communicating with local jurisdictions and incorporates into plan.
5.1.3.
Assist regions and local jurisdictions in identifying licensing and renewal requirements by Oct.
1, 2005.
Work with the federal, state, and local responding agencies to determine the best avenue to
create a statewide interoperable communications system with a target date of February 15,
2005.
5.2.1.1. Implementation Step: Complete the I-35 corridor project and use the lessons learned.
17
By October 1 of each year, each COG completes an analysis of remaining funding requirements
necessary to assist local jurisdictions in purchasing equipment that will allow regional
communications.
5.3.1.1. Implementation Step: TEEX provides regular reports on equipment purchased with
grant funding to each COG.
5.3.1.2. Implementation Step: Each COG evaluates remaining requirements and uses the
information when making recommendations on distribution of regional funding.
All Texas WMD exercises will include interpretability communications by the Oct. 1, 2004
date.
5.5.1.1. Implementation Step: DEM and TEEX include interoperable communications in
exercise design.
6. Goal: Enhance local emergency response capabilities by encouraging the adoption of interlocal (mutual aid) agreements for emergency response .
6.1. Planning Objectives
6.1.1.
Provide assistance to local jurisdictions in the form of updated Mutual Aid templates,
resolution of insurance and liability issues. and resolution of workmans compensation issues
with updates provided by September 30 of each year.
6.1.1.1. Implementation Step: The State Homeland Security Coordinator requests that the
Texas Attorney General review inter-jurisdictional Mutual Aid Assistance templates by
September 30 of each year to ensure compliance with current legislation. This review
should include templates between jurisdictions within Texas, agreements between a
Texas jurisdiction and a jurisdiction in another state, and potential agreements
between a Texas jurisdiction and a jurisdiction in Mexico. Updated templates can
then be distributed to local jurisdictions through the COGs.
6.1.1.2. Implementation Step. The State Homeland Security Coordinator requests the Texas
Department of Insurance conduct an annual review of Mutual Aid Agreement
insurance issues. Products of the review should include guidance for local jurisdictions
to be distributed through the COGs and, when appropriate, proposals for the
legislature. This review should be completed by September 30 of each year.
18
6.1.2.
Within each COG region, adequate inter-local (mutual aid) agreements are in place to create
regional coverage for emergency services essential for response to a potential terrorist incident
by February 1, 2006.
6.1.2.1. Implementation step: Each COG maintains information on the status of Mutual Aid
Agreements in the region for multiple emergency response disciplines and functions
to include public health.
6.1.2.2. Resources requirements necessary for mutual aid creation and monitoring in each
region for the next two years are available by Oct. 1 of each year.
Major regional responders have the necessary equipment to meet regional requirements by Oct.
1, 2008.
6.2.1.1. Implementation Step: Continue to use the prioritization system that emphasizes
regional response.
6.2.1.2. Each COG monitors progress toward regional capability when recommending
regional funding distribution.
6.2.2.
By October 1, 2004, exercises conducted using State Homeland Security Grant Program
funding will exercise Mutual Aid Agreements.
6.3.1.1. TEEX and DEM include Mutual Aid Agreements in exercise design.
19
7. Goal: Improve the capability of state agencies to assist local governments in responding to
all hazards, including terrorist incidents.
7.1. Planning Objectives
7.1.1.
By October 1 of each year, state agencies identify projects and resource requirements that
improve their ability to assist local governments in responding to terrorist incidents or other
disasters.
7.1.1.1. Implementation Step: Agencies submit their requirements by October 1 of each year
to the SAA for consolidation.
7.1.1.2. Implementation Step: The SAA prepares recommendations on use of potential grant
funding and provides recommendations to the State Director of Homeland Security.
7.1.1.3. Implementation Step: The State Director of Homeland Security presents
recommendations to the Governor on use of funds available for state level use.
7.2.Equipment Objectives
7.1.2.
By October 1 of each year, equipment requirements for state agencies identified when
completing the planning objective are provided to the SAA.
7.1.2.1. Implementation Step: Agencies submit their requirements by Oct. 1 to the SAA for
consolidation.
7.1.2.2. Implementation Step: The SAA prepares recommendations on use of potential grant
funding and provides recommendations to the State Director of Homeland Security.
7.1.2.3. Implementation Step: The State Director of Homeland Security presents
recommendations to the Governor on use of funds available for state level use.
By September 30 of each year develop a plan for forming additional Citizen Corps Councils
during the next fiscal year.
20
Provide resources to allow training of Community Emergency Response Teams (CERT) and
Citizen Corps Councils by developing a plan for resource allocation by February 15, 2004 and
by January 15 of each year thereafter.
Recovery Goal
9. Goal: Minimize recover y time.
9.1. Planning Objectives
9.1.1.
By Oct. 1, 2005, each COG region develops a plan for assisting local jurisdictions in
establishing private and public sector alliances.
By October 1 of each year, identify resources to provide training for damage assessment team
members.
9.2.1.1. Implementation Step: Identify any training opportunities for potential assessment
team members on a regional level.
The TEEX coordinates efforts of the Texas Animal Health Commission, the Texas Department
of Agriculture, and other assets as needed to establish a statewide training program to train first
responders, stakeholders, veterinarians and health workers to recognize pests and disease
symptoms related to current agroterrorism threats by July 1, 2005.
10.1.1.1.Implementation Step: Determine resources requirements and desired delivery
methods.
10.1.1.2. Implementation Step: Identify locations for pilot program.
10.1.1.3.Implementation Step: Identify agencies for curriculum development.
10.1.1.4. Implementation Step: Identify instructors.
10.1.1.5.Implementation Step: Present pilot courses and obtain feedback for curriculum.
Improve detection and monitoring to provide early recognition and reporting of a pest or
disease outbreak or act of terrorism in high risk areas by July 1, 2005.
10.2.1.1.Implementation Step: Identify high risk areas.
10.2.1.2. Implementation Step: Determine current detection and monitoring capabilities in
high risk areas.
21
10.2.1.3.Implementation Step: Develop a plan to meet the strategic goal for each high risk
area.
10.3. Equipment Objectives
10.3.1.
Increase capability of global information systems (GIS) spatial analysis and remote sensing to
analyze the scope of a pest or disease outbreak or attack, trace its origins and manage
intervention in Texas by July 1, 2005.
10.3.1.1.Implementation Step: Provide and inventory and analysis of current GIS capability by
Jan. 15, 2005.
10.3.1.2. Implementation Step: Integrate efforts with other state agencies using GIS.
10.3.1.3.Implementation Step: Identify needed equipment and software upgrades by June 15,
2005.
10.3.1.4. Implementation Step: Enhance system as resources become available.
10.3.2.
Improve response capabilities by enhancing epidemiological models, risk analysis tools, and
computerized decision support systems for analysis within high risk areas by Feb. 1, 2006.
10.3.2.1.Implementation Step: Provide an inventory and analysis of current tools by Jan. 15,
2005.
10.3.2.2. Implementation Step: Recommend improvements by June 15, 2005.
10.3.2.3.Implementation Step: Begin acquisition of tools as resources allow.
10.3.3.
Increase public information outreach to support all prevention activities focusing on areas of
high risk by February 1, 2006.
10.3.3.1.Implementation Step: Evaluate existing public outreach programs.
10.3.3.2.Implementation Step: Solicit industry support.
10.3.3.3.Implementation Step: Identify areas and programs for resourcing.
10.3.4.
Develop a system to maintain up to date information on efforts to improve the immune and/or
resistance status of animals and plants that are important to Texas agriculture and provide input
to research organizations on desired improvements by February 1, 2006.
10.3.4.1.Implementation Step: Work with Texas A&M University to obtain information on
efforts to improve animal and plant resistance at A&M and other institutions
nationwide.
10.3.4.2.Implementation Step: Identify means to input recommendations on research efforts.
22
Evaluate current agricultural response plans by February 1, 2005 and modify as needed.
11.1.2.
By September 30 of each year evaluate the need for new agricultural plans and establish a
timeline for development of new plans during the next fiscal year.
11.1.3.
Develop an effective After Action Review process to evaluate and enhance response operations
and improve countermeasures by Feb. 1, 2005.
Establish a training implementation plan for training responders to effectively implement the
agricultural response plans by February 1, 2005.
Develop an exercise plan for conducting agricultural exercises to test the response plans,
epidemiological modes, and decision support systems by February 1, 2005.
Identify and obtain an enhanced communications capability in conjunction with overall state
interoperable communications efforts with an objective of basic capability by February 1, 2006.
11.4.1.1. Implementation Step: Identify specific communication requirements for the
agricultural response.
11.4.1.2.Implementation Step: Follow the objectives and implementation steps found in Goal
5.
11.4.2.
11.4.3.
Increase public information outreach to support all response activities in areas of high risk by
February 1, 2006.
11.4.3.1.Implementation Step: Evaluate existing public outreach programs.
11.4.3.2.Implementation Step: Solicit industry support.
23
Develop a system to evaluate the economic and social impact of the incident as related to
stakeholders, responders, and other affected entities by Feb. 1, 2005.
12.1.2.
Develop a state system to quickly identify sources and/or develop mechanisms for rapid
compensation of affected parties by February 1, 2005.
12.1.3.
Incorporate plans for dealing with stress-related issues for responders and stakeholders to
include potential resources into statewide agriculture response plans by February 1, 2006.
12.1.4.
12.1.5.
Incorporate plans for evaluating and remediating any adverse environmental consequences as a
result of the incident into agricultural response plans by July 1, 2006.
12.1.6.
Increase public information outreach to support all recovery activities in areas of high risk by
February 1, 2006.
12.1.6.1.Implementation Step: Evaluate existing public outreach programs.
12.1.6.2.Implementation Step: Solicit industry support.
12.1.6.3.Implementation Step: Identify areas and programs for resourcing.
24
Chapter 5
Evaluation Plan
Review & Analysis
The Office for Domestic Preparedness is providing evaluation tools in the form of the Biannual Strategy
Implementation Reports. These will be the principal means of evaluating strategy progress. Additional methods
include input from the Regional Councils of Governments on regional progress and review of progress with the State
Homeland Security Director. The Councils of Governments (COG) will fulfill a key role in gathering information on
implementation progress. The State Administrative Agency will conduct weekly conference calls with the 24 COGs
to evaluate strategy implementation progress in the areas of Planning, Organization, Equipping, Training and
Exercising. Each exercise will include an written After Action Report (AAR) that is provided to the participating
jurisdiction, the Division of Emergency Management, and the State Administrative Agency.
Reported Information
Reports will focus on project accomplishment and relate the projects to goals and objectives of the State Homeland
Security Strategic Plan Part II.
25
26
Annex A
List of Jurisdictions
Notes:
County populations have been adjusted to reflect only the population that resides outside of incorporated
municipalities.
Jurisdiction
FIPS
Population
Assessment
48901
2,000
Yes
Anderson County
48001
34,427
Yes
Andrews County
48003
3,375
Yes
Angelina County
48005
35,450
Yes
Aransas County
48007
12,218
Yes
Archer County
48009
3,325
Yes
Armstrong County
48011
832
Yes
Atascosa County
48013
20,433
Yes
Austin County
48015
12,195
Yes
Bailey County
48017
2,039
Yes
Bandera County
48019
18,066
Yes
Bastrop County
48021
47,188
Yes
Baylor County
48023
1,144
Yes
Bee County
48025
19,315
Yes
Bell County
48027
51,327
Yes
Bexar County
48029
146,858
Yes
Blanco County
48031
5,907
Yes
Borden County
48033
701
Yes
A-1
Jurisdiction
FIPS
Population
Assessment
Bosque County
48035
9,321
Yes
Bowie County
48037
34,598
Yes
Brazoria County
48039
94,747
Yes
Brazos County
48041
18,312
Yes
Brewster County
48043
3,075
Yes
Briscoe County
48045
563
Yes
Brooks County
48047
2,632
Yes
Brown County
48049
14,144
Yes
Burleson County
48051
10,933
Yes
Burnet County
48053
20,425
Yes
Caldwell County
48055
15,002
Yes
Calhoun County
48057
6,513
Yes
Callahan County
48059
6,699
Yes
Cameron County
48061
82,870
Yes
Camp County
48063
7,219
No
Carson County
48065
1,700
Yes
Cashion Community
13198
342
Yes
Cass County
48067
17,674
Yes
Castro County
48069
2,311
Yes
Chambers County
48071
15,713
Yes
Cherokee County
48073
24,384
Yes
Childress County
48075
921
Yes
City of Abbott
100
311
No
City of Abernathy
160
2,771
Yes
City of Abilene
1000
115,225
Yes
City of Ackerly
1108
240
No
City of Adrian
1324
157
No
1396
737
No
A-2
Jurisdiction
FIPS
Population
Assessment
City of Alamo
1576
15,518
Yes
1600
7,262
Yes
City of Alba
1636
446
Yes
City of Albany
1648
1,937
Yes
City of Aledo
1744
2,074
No
City of Alice
1852
19,104
Yes
City of Allen
1924
57,216
Yes
City of Alma
2044
311
No
City of Alpine
2104
5,934
No
City of Alto
2188
1,127
No
City of Alton
2212
4,856
Yes
City of Alvarado
2260
3,671
Yes
City of Alvin
2272
22,025
Yes
City of Alvord
2284
1,138
No
City of Amarillo
3000
177,010
Yes
City of Ames
3072
1,140
No
City of Amherst
3084
783
No
City of Anahuac
3144
2,176
No
City of Anderson
3192
271
No
City of Andrews
3216
9,576
Yes
City of Angleton
3264
18,538
Yes
City of Angus
3288
354
No
City of Anna
3300
1,277
No
3340
488
No
City of Annona
3360
273
No
City of Anson
3372
2,451
Yes
City of Anton
3540
1,178
Yes
City of Appleby
3564
439
No
A-3
Jurisdiction
FIPS
Population
Assessment
City of Aquilla
3588
141
No
3600
8,276
No
3696
1,857
Yes
City of Arcola
3708
1,137
No
City of Argyle
3768
2,596
No
City of Arlington
4000
349,944
Yes
City of Arp
4156
911
No
City of Asherton
4300
1,322
Yes
City of Aspermont
4408
908
Yes
City of Athens
4504
11,716
Yes
City of Atlanta
4516
5,640
Yes
City of Aubrey
4600
1,731
No
City of Aurora
4672
934
No
City of Austin
5000
671,873
Yes
City of Austwell
5036
190
No
City of Avery
5072
451
No
City of Avinger
5084
455
No
City of Azle
5168
9,968
Yes
City of Bailey
5264
215
No
5288
709
No
City of Baird
5336
1,587
Yes
5372
19,480
No
5384
3,015
Yes
City of Ballinger
5456
4,085
Yes
City of Balmorhea
5468
503
Yes
City of Bandera
5528
1,087
Yes
City of Bangs
5552
1,633
Yes
City of Bardwell
5612
603
Yes
A-4
Jurisdiction
FIPS
Population
Assessment
City of Barry
5708
215
No
City of Barstow
5720
390
Yes
City of Bartlett
5732
1,682
Yes
City of Bastrop
5864
6,233
Yes
5984
18,450
No
6060
1,653
Yes
City of Baytown
6128
67,360
Yes
6200
1,750
Yes
City of Beasley
6272
628
No
City of Beaumont
7000
112,871
Yes
City of Beckville
7108
752
No
City of Bedford
7132
48,378
Yes
City of Beeville
7192
12,962
Yes
City of Bellaire
7300
16,739
Yes
City of Bellevue
7396
399
Yes
City of Bellmead
7408
9,480
Yes
City of Bells
7420
1,222
Yes
City of Bellville
7432
4,133
Yes
City of Belton
7492
14,621
Yes
City of Benavides
7528
1,635
No
City of Benbrook
7552
20,652
No
City of Benjamin
7636
254
Yes
City of Berryville
7852
910
No
City of Bertram
7864
1,208
No
8104
2,099
No
8128
1,309
Yes
8212
2,760
Yes
8224
1,310
No
A-5
Jurisdiction
FIPS
Population
Assessment
8236
24,798
Yes
8260
716
Yes
City of Bishop
8392
3,255
Yes
8398
212
No
City of Blackwell
8488
349
Yes
City of Blanco
8536
1,595
No
City of Blanket
8596
400
Yes
City of Bloomburg
8752
372
Yes
8788
860
No
City of Blossom
8812
1,449
Yes
8860
2,412
No
8872
763
Yes
City of Blum
9004
420
No
City of Boerne
9160
6,566
Yes
City of Bogata
9172
1,361
Yes
City of Bonham
9328
10,045
Yes
City of Booker
9448
1,340
No
City of Borger
9556
13,709
Yes
City of Bovina
9628
1,849
Yes
City of Bowie
9640
5,231
Yes
City of Boyd
9748
1,182
No
City of Brackettville
9868
1,912
Yes
City of Brady
9916
5,289
Yes
City of Brazoria
10072
2,851
Yes
City of Breckenridge
10132
5,690
Yes
City of Bremond
10144
868
Yes
City of Brenham
10156
13,568
Yes
City of Briaroaks
10216
514
No
A-6
Jurisdiction
FIPS
Population
Assessment
10252
8,629
Yes
City of Bridgeport
10264
4,606
No
City of Bronte
10528
1,061
Yes
City of Brookshire
10636
3,495
Yes
10648
2,020
No
City of Browndell
10708
222
Yes
City of Brownfield
10720
9,438
Yes
City of Brownsboro
10756
818
No
City of Brownsville
10768
150,425
Yes
City of Brownwood
10780
19,093
Yes
City of Bruceville-Eddy
10828
1,528
No
City of Bryan
10912
66,669
Yes
City of Bryson
10960
535
Yes
City of Buda
11080
3,627
Yes
City of Buffalo
11116
1,867
Yes
City of Bullard
11212
1,263
Yes
City of Bulverde
11224
4,228
Yes
11300
3,754
Yes
City of Burkburnett
11368
10,778
Yes
City of Burke
11380
316
No
City of Burleson
11428
23,825
Yes
City of Burnet
11464
4,935
Yes
City of Burton
11536
357
Yes
City of Byers
11644
534
Yes
City of Bynum
11656
234
No
City of Cactus
11692
2,647
No
11716
1,170
No
City of Caldwell
11836
3,623
No
A-7
Jurisdiction
FIPS
Population
Assessment
City of Callisburg
11968
383
No
City of Calvert
11992
1,403
Yes
City of Cameron
12040
5,757
Yes
12388
789
Yes
City of Campbell
12112
759
No
City of Canadian
12412
2,213
Yes
12472
244
No
City of Canton
12496
3,382
Yes
City of Canyon
12532
12,980
Yes
City of Carbon
12736
223
No
12895
143
No
City of Carmine
12916
230
Yes
12988
5,584
Yes
City of Carrollton
13024
115,107
Yes
City of Carthage
13108
6,544
No
13276
4,194
Yes
City of Castroville
13312
2,798
Yes
13492
37,269
Yes
13552
37,764
Yes
City of Celeste
13672
828
No
City of Celina
13684
2,140
Yes
City of Center
13732
5,635
Yes
City of Centerville
13900
932
Yes
City of Chandler
14224
2,169
No
City of Channing
14260
350
No
City of Charlotte
14404
1,727
No
City of Chester
14584
263
Yes
City of Chico
14620
1,005
No
A-8
Jurisdiction
FIPS
Population
Assessment
City of Childress
14668
6,650
Yes
City of Chillicothe
14680
759
Yes
City of China
14704
1,089
Yes
14716
1,272
No
City of Christine
14860
467
No
City of Cibolo
14920
3,712
No
City of Cisco
15004
3,785
Yes
City of Clarendon
15112
1,985
Yes
City of Clarksville
15160
3,748
Yes
15172
818
No
City of Claude
15196
1,313
Yes
15328
1,214
Yes
City of Cleburne
15364
27,492
Yes
City of Cleveland
15436
7,830
Yes
City of Clifton
15472
3,617
Yes
City of Clute
15652
10,698
No
City of Clyde
15676
3,351
Yes
City of Coahoma
15700
933
Yes
15796
4,398
No
15820
196
No
City of Coldspring
15892
714
Yes
City of Coleman
15916
5,010
Yes
15976
70,550
Yes
City of Colleyville
15988
21,085
Yes
City of Collinsville
16036
1,324
Yes
City of Colmesneil
16048
635
Yes
16120
4,037
Yes
City of Columbus
16168
3,869
Yes
A-9
Jurisdiction
FIPS
Population
Assessment
City of Comanche
16192
4,296
Yes
City of Combine
16216
1,933
No
City of Commerce
16240
8,243
No
City of Como
16252
629
No
City of Conroe
16432
39,065
No
City of Converse
16468
11,939
Yes
City of Cool
16540
172
No
City of Coolidge
16552
857
No
City of Cooper
16564
2,128
No
City of Coppell
16612
39,460
Yes
16624
29,599
Yes
City of Corinth
16696
14,925
No
17000
278,520
Yes
17024
125
No
City of Corrigan
17036
1,855
Yes
City of Corsicana
17060
25,187
Yes
City of Cottonwood
17200
191
No
17208
933
No
City of Cotulla
17216
3,609
Yes
City of Cove
17336
323
Yes
City of Covington
17372
291
No
City of Crandall
17504
2,984
No
City of Crane
17516
3,087
Yes
17540
339
No
City of Crawford
17564
751
Yes
City of Creedmoor
17612
194
Yes
City of Crockett
17744
7,084
Yes
City of Crosbyton
17768
1,814
Yes
A-10
Jurisdiction
FIPS
Population
Assessment
17816
1,040
Yes
City of Crowell
17948
1,085
Yes
City of Crowley
17960
8,174
Yes
18020
7,114
Yes
City of Cuero
18092
6,654
Yes
City of Cumby
18128
621
No
City of Cuney
18152
147
No
City of Cushing
18224
642
No
City of Daingerfield
18464
2,523
Yes
City of Daisetta
18476
1,082
No
City of Dalhart
18524
7,164
Yes
City of Dallas
19000
1,211,467
Yes
19084
2,305
Yes
City of Danbury
19120
1,649
No
City of Dawson
19420
875
No
City of Dayton
19432
6,038
Yes
19435
104
No
City of De Leon
19672
2,352
Yes
City of Dean
19456
356
Yes
City of Decatur
19528
5,584
Yes
19624
28,992
Yes
City of DeKalb
19648
1,802
Yes
19792
34,611
Yes
19708
415
No
City of Denison
19900
23,169
Yes
City of Denton
19972
90,349
Yes
19984
3,965
Yes
City of Deport
20020
727
Yes
A-11
Jurisdiction
FIPS
Population
Assessment
City of DeSoto
20092
39,440
Yes
City of Detroit
20128
758
No
City of Devers
20140
433
No
City of Devine
20152
4,282
No
City of Diboll
20308
5,439
Yes
City of Dickens
20332
326
Yes
City of Dickinson
20344
17,668
Yes
City of Dilley
20428
4,166
Yes
City of Dimmitt
20464
4,236
Yes
20680
426
No
City of Dodson
20716
112
No
City of Domino
20848
52
No
City of Donna
20884
15,478
Yes
City of Dorchester
20932
113
No
City of Douglassville
21112
172
No
21424
1,625
Yes
City of Driscoll
21436
825
No
City of Dublin
21484
3,694
Yes
City of Dumas
21556
13,808
Yes
City of Duncanville
21628
36,203
No
21844
3,671
Yes
21892
23,506
Yes
City of Early
21904
2,687
Yes
City of Earth
21928
1,099
No
22168
599
No
22276
857
No
City of Eastland
22132
3,775
Yes
City of Easton
22192
546
No
A-12
Jurisdiction
FIPS
Population
Assessment
City of Ector
22516
610
No
City of Edcouch
22528
3,901
No
City of Eden
22552
2,514
Yes
City of Edgewood
22612
1,391
No
City of Edinburg
22660
52,764
Yes
City of Edmonson
22708
121
Yes
City of Edna
22720
5,871
Yes
City of Edom
22744
334
No
City of El Campo
22864
10,889
Yes
City of El Cenizo
22905
3,609
Yes
City of El Lago
23164
3,085
No
City of El Paso
24000
577,415
Yes
City of Eldorado
22960
1,955
Yes
City of Electra
22984
3,089
Yes
City of Elgin
23044
6,313
Yes
City of Elkhart
23140
1,233
No
City of Elmendorf
23272
702
No
City of Elsa
24036
5,934
No
City of Emhouse
24168
167
No
City of Emory
24216
1,138
No
City of Encinal
24240
637
Yes
City of Ennis
24348
17,883
Yes
City of Estelline
24636
163
No
City of Euless
24768
48,464
Yes
City of Eureka
24816
358
No
City of Eustace
24828
812
No
City of Evant
24864
388
Yes
City of Everman
24912
5,880
No
A-13
Jurisdiction
FIPS
Population
Assessment
25168
5,186
Yes
City of Fairfield
25104
3,338
Yes
City of Falfurrias
25368
5,134
Yes
25392
590
Yes
25452
27,454
Yes
City of Farmersville
25488
3,221
No
City of Farwell
25548
1,335
No
City of Fate
25572
1,043
No
City of Fayetteville
25644
264
Yes
City of Ferris
25752
2,224
No
City of Flatonia
26028
1,420
Yes
City of Florence
26136
1,100
No
City of Floresville
26160
6,329
Yes
City of Floydada
26268
3,435
Yes
City of Follett
26328
416
No
26544
13,223
Yes
City of Forney
26604
6,378
No
City of Forsan
26640
225
Yes
26808
7,588
Yes
27000
567,516
Yes
City of Franklin
27288
1,468
Yes
City of Frankston
27300
1,194
No
City of Fredericksburg
27348
9,346
Yes
City of Freeport
27420
12,802
Yes
City of Freer
27432
3,180
No
City of Friendswood
27648
31,497
Yes
City of Friona
27660
3,807
Yes
City of Frisco
27684
47,652
Yes
A-14
Jurisdiction
FIPS
Population
Assessment
City of Fritch
27696
2,162
Yes
City of Frost
27768
673
No
City of Fruitvale
27804
433
No
City of Fulshear
27876
870
No
City of Gainesville
27984
15,930
Yes
27996
10,588
Yes
City of Gallatin
28008
388
No
City of Galveston
28068
56,685
Yes
City of Ganado
28080
1,898
No
28248
2,033
Yes
City of Garland
29000
219,646
Yes
City of Garrett
29036
459
No
City of Garrison
29060
840
No
29108
303
No
City of Gatesville
29168
15,195
Yes
29348
2,443
Yes
City of Georgetown
29336
33,246
Yes
City of Gholson
29408
942
No
City of Giddings
29432
5,269
Yes
City of Gilmer
29564
4,975
No
City of Gladewater
29660
6,161
Yes
29876
2,322
No
29840
7,946
No
City of Godley
29972
923
No
City of Goldsmith
30044
256
No
City of Goldthwaite
30056
1,794
Yes
City of Goliad
30080
2,008
Yes
City of Golinda
30092
419
No
A-15
Jurisdiction
FIPS
Population
Assessment
City of Gonzales
30116
7,244
Yes
City of Goodlow
30188
276
No
City of Goodrich
30224
264
Yes
City of Gordon
30272
455
No
City of Goree
30296
307
Yes
City of Gorman
30308
1,236
Yes
City of Graford
30380
595
No
City of Graham
30392
8,581
Yes
City of Granbury
30416
6,162
Yes
30464
135,303
Yes
30476
3,095
No
City of Grandfalls
30440
376
Yes
City of Grandview
30512
1,464
No
City of Granger
30548
1,271
Yes
30584
2,120
Yes
City of Granjeno
30608
313
No
City of Grapeland
30632
1,439
Yes
City of Grapevine
30644
45,830
Yes
30752
318
No
City of Greenville
30920
24,504
Yes
City of Gregory
31064
2,282
No
31100
432
No
City of Groesbeck
31280
4,311
Yes
City of Groom
31292
590
Yes
City of Groves
31328
15,414
Yes
City of Groveton
31340
1,122
Yes
City of Gruver
31412
1,141
Yes
31592
5,411
No
A-16
Jurisdiction
FIPS
Population
Assessment
City of Gunter
31616
1,415
Yes
City of Gustine
31628
439
No
31820
2,184
Yes
City of Hallettsville
31868
2,291
Yes
City of Hallsburg
31880
530
No
City of Hallsville
31904
2,783
No
31928
39,889
Yes
City of Hamilton
31952
2,971
Yes
City of Hamlin
31964
2,136
Yes
City of Happy
32156
632
Yes
City of Hardin
32240
795
No
32312
18,055
Yes
City of Harlingen
32372
59,384
Yes
City of Hart
32576
1,175
Yes
City of Haskell
32696
3,002
Yes
City of Haslet
32720
1,294
No
80732
478
No
City of Hawkins
32816
1,377
Yes
City of Hawley
32840
630
Yes
City of Hays
32906
242
Yes
City of Hearne
32972
4,711
Yes
City of Heath
32984
5,455
Yes
City of Hebron
33020
155
No
City of Hedley
33044
385
Yes
33068
2,356
Yes
City of Helotes
33146
4,989
Yes
City of Hemphill
33188
1,083
Yes
City of Hempstead
33200
5,692
Yes
A-17
Jurisdiction
FIPS
Population
Assessment
City of Henderson
33212
11,150
Yes
City of Henrietta
33284
3,381
Yes
City of Hereford
33320
14,423
Yes
City of Hewitt
33428
11,944
Yes
City of Hico
33548
1,322
Yes
City of Hidalgo
33560
8,599
Yes
City of Higgins
33608
435
No
33794
472
No
33848
13,527
Yes
33968
1,058
Yes
33980
731
No
City of Hillsboro
34088
8,590
Yes
34148
742
Yes
City of Hitchcock
34220
7,107
Yes
34502
1,131
No
City of Holland
34508
1,112
Yes
City of Holliday
34532
1,671
Yes
City of Hondo
34676
8,117
Yes
34700
1,760
Yes
City of Hooks
34736
2,961
Yes
City of Houston
35000
2,009,834
Yes
City of Howardwick
35072
452
Yes
City of Howe
35084
2,610
Yes
City of Hubbard
35180
1,627
Yes
City of Hudson
35228
3,886
Yes
35254
1,724
Yes
35300
1,851
Yes
City of Humble
35348
14,847
Yes
A-18
Jurisdiction
FIPS
Population
Assessment
35480
4,515
Yes
City of Huntington
35492
2,091
Yes
City of Huntsville
35528
35,730
Yes
City of Hurst
35576
36,809
Yes
City of Hutchins
35612
2,850
Yes
City of Hutto
35624
2,971
Yes
City of Huxley
35636
305
No
City of Idalou
35732
2,137
Yes
City of Impact
35816
38
No
City of Industry
35984
317
No
City of Ingleside
36008
8,796
No
36020
649
No
City of Ingram
36032
1,794
No
36092
866
No
36104
6,323
Yes
City of Iraan
36128
1,215
Yes
City of Iredell
36140
362
Yes
City of Irving
37000
196,119
Yes
City of Italy
37072
2,028
No
City of Itasca
37084
1,558
No
37156
10,382
Yes
City of Jacksboro
37168
4,586
Yes
City of Jacksonville
37216
14,034
Yes
City of Jarrell
37396
1,384
Yes
City of Jasper
37420
7,634
Yes
City of Jayton
37468
484
No
City of Jefferson
37528
2,003
No
37612
7,181
No
A-19
Jurisdiction
FIPS
Population
Assessment
City of Jewett
37648
897
No
City of Joaquin
37684
917
No
37780
1,248
Yes
City of Jolly
37924
194
Yes
City of Jonestown
38020
1,751
Yes
City of Josephine
38068
675
No
City of Joshua
38080
5,004
Yes
City of Jourdanton
38116
3,956
No
City of Junction
38248
2,631
Yes
City of Justin
38332
2,153
No
38452
3,439
Yes
City of Katy
38476
12,430
Yes
City of Kaufman
38488
7,204
No
City of Keene
38548
5,396
No
City of Keller
38632
32,921
Yes
City of Kemah
38776
2,325
Yes
City of Kemp
38788
1,189
No
City of Kempner
38800
1,084
Yes
City of Kendleton
38848
495
No
City of Kenedy
38860
3,431
Yes
City of Kenefick
38872
710
No
City of Kennard
38884
317
Yes
City of Kennedale
38896
6,320
Yes
City of Kerens
38992
1,720
No
City of Kermit
39004
5,466
Yes
City of Kerrville
39040
21,090
Yes
City of Kilgore
39124
11,477
Yes
City of Killeen
39148
92,707
Yes
A-20
Jurisdiction
FIPS
Population
Assessment
City of Kingsville
39352
25,175
Yes
City of Kirby
39448
8,707
Yes
City of Kirbyville
39460
2,061
Yes
City of Kirvin
39520
126
No
City of Knollwood
39680
406
No
39700
1,163
Yes
City of Kosse
39844
503
No
City of Kountze
39868
2,114
Yes
City of Kress
39904
805
No
City of Krugerville
39916
1,046
No
City of Krum
39928
2,321
No
City of Kyle
39952
8,540
No
City of La Coste
40108
1,319
Yes
City of La Feria
40204
6,361
No
City of La Grange
40276
4,577
Yes
City of La Grulla
40288
1,277
Yes
City of La Joya
40384
4,136
No
City of La Marque
41116
13,729
Yes
City of La Porte
41440
33,214
Yes
City of La Vernia
41764
970
Yes
City of La Villa
41788
1,377
No
City of La Ward
41848
201
No
40168
5,778
Yes
City of Ladonia
40180
671
No
40264
4,981
Yes
40450
396
No
40472
528
No
40516
6,647
No
A-21
Jurisdiction
FIPS
Population
Assessment
40588
26,954
No
41056
4,668
No
City of Lakeport
40696
889
No
City of Lakeside
40738
332
No
40756
1,008
Yes
City of Lakeview
40888
148
Yes
City of Lakeway
40984
8,236
Yes
41050
354
No
City of Lamesa
41164
9,657
Yes
City of Lampasas
41188
7,207
Yes
City of Lancaster
41212
27,082
Yes
City of Laredo
41464
191,538
Yes
City of Latexo
41644
275
Yes
City of Lavon
41800
399
No
City of Lawn
41872
348
No
41980
51,397
Yes
City of Leakey
42004
385
Yes
City of Leander
42016
11,661
Yes
City of Leary
42028
563
Yes
City of Lefors
42148
548
No
42388
9,338
Yes
City of Leona
42340
189
No
City of Leonard
42352
1,905
No
City of Leroy
42400
329
No
City of Levelland
42448
12,932
Yes
City of Lewisville
42508
83,960
Yes
City of Lexington
42532
1,238
Yes
City of Liberty
42568
8,263
Yes
A-22
Jurisdiction
FIPS
Population
Assessment
42664
1,471
No
42808
566
No
City of Lindale
42820
3,370
Yes
City of Linden
42844
2,223
No
City of Lipan
42940
451
No
43066
1,637
Yes
City of Littlefield
43024
6,456
Yes
43096
9,567
Yes
City of Liverpool
43120
415
No
City of Livingston
43132
6,172
Yes
City of Llano
43144
3,459
Yes
City of Lockhart
43240
12,769
Yes
City of Lockney
43252
1,966
Yes
43354
774
No
City of Lometa
43516
818
Yes
43636
538
No
43684
1,638
Yes
City of Longview
43888
74,330
Yes
City of Loraine
43996
623
No
City of Lorena
44020
1,489
Yes
City of Lorenzo
44032
1,327
No
44116
4,803
No
44128
1,157
No
44170
31
No
City of Lott
44176
696
Yes
City of Lovelady
44260
611
Yes
44308
1,470
Yes
City of Lubbock
45000
203,715
Yes
A-23
Jurisdiction
FIPS
Population
Assessment
City of Lucas
45012
3,174
No
City of Lueders
45048
287
Yes
City of Lufkin
45072
32,748
Yes
City of Luling
45096
5,281
Yes
City of Lumberton
45120
8,905
Yes
City of Lyford
45228
1,953
No
City of Lytle
45288
2,524
No
City of Mabank
45324
2,315
No
City of Madisonville
45996
4,189
Yes
City of Magnolia
46056
1,173
No
City of Malakoff
46224
2,290
No
City of Malone
46260
285
No
City of Manor
46440
1,187
Yes
City of Mansfield
46452
31,630
Yes
City of Manvel
46500
3,201
Yes
46584
5,276
Yes
City of Marfa
46620
2,105
No
City of Marietta
46668
110
No
City of Marion
46692
1,122
Yes
City of Marlin
46740
6,428
Yes
City of Marquez
46752
225
No
City of Marshall
46776
23,977
Yes
City of Mart
46824
2,247
No
City of Martindale
46848
997
Yes
City of Mason
46968
2,163
Yes
City of Matador
47004
695
Yes
City of Mathis
47040
5,198
No
City of Maud
47088
1,018
Yes
A-24
Jurisdiction
FIPS
Population
Assessment
City of Maypearl
47268
787
No
City of McAllen
45384
113,877
Yes
City of McCamey
45432
1,731
Yes
City of McGregor
45672
4,756
Yes
City of McKinney
45744
73,081
Yes
City of McLean
45780
810
Yes
City of McLendon-Chisholm
45804
937
No
City of Meadow
47316
652
No
City of Meadowlakes
47330
1,520
No
47335
5,176
Yes
City of Megargel
47460
250
Yes
City of Melissa
47496
1,686
No
City of Melvin
47568
148
Yes
City of Memphis
47616
2,395
Yes
City of Menard
47628
1,632
Yes
City of Mercedes
47700
14,150
Yes
City of Meridian
47760
1,491
Yes
City of Merkel
47796
2,597
Yes
City of Mertens
47820
150
No
City of Mertzon
47832
834
Yes
City of Mesquite
47892
128,776
Yes
City of Mexia
47916
6,583
No
City of Miami
47988
569
No
City of Midland
48072
95,829
Yes
City of Midlothian
48096
9,815
Yes
City of Midway
48180
297
No
City of Milano
48336
414
Yes
City of Mildred
48372
424
No
A-25
Jurisdiction
FIPS
Population
Assessment
City of Miles
48396
834
Yes
City of Milford
48408
693
No
48478
125
No
City of Millsap
48564
368
No
City of Mineola
48648
4,680
Yes
48684
16,968
Yes
City of Mingus
48720
248
No
City of Mission
48768
51,432
Yes
48804
59,186
Yes
City of Mobeetie
48852
104
Yes
48858
210
No
City of Monahans
48936
6,541
Yes
49068
2,447
No
City of Montgomery
49128
523
No
City of Moody
49200
1,401
No
49272
187
No
City of Moran
49320
234
Yes
City of Morgan
49356
500
Yes
49380
342
No
49392
3,357
Yes
City of Morton
49464
2,089
Yes
City of Moulton
49560
931
Yes
49692
322
No
49728
526
No
49800
14,174
Yes
49860
2,325
Yes
49600
698
No
City of Muenster
49932
1,625
Yes
A-26
Jurisdiction
FIPS
Population
Assessment
City of Muleshoe
49968
4,441
Yes
City of Mullin
49992
176
Yes
City of Munday
50040
1,461
Yes
City of Murchison
50076
606
No
City of Murphy
50100
6,675
No
City of Mustang
50184
51
No
50200
893
Yes
City of Nacogdoches
50256
30,289
Yes
City of Naples
50316
1,435
Yes
City of Nash
50352
2,169
Yes
50376
4,186
Yes
City of Natalia
50400
1,739
Yes
City of Navarro
50448
197
No
City of Navasota
50472
7,154
Yes
City of Nazareth
50496
353
Yes
City of Nederland
50580
17,035
Yes
City of Needville
50628
2,851
Yes
City of Nesbitt
50724
308
No
City of Nevada
50760
592
No
50796
483
No
50808
4,667
Yes
50820
41,239
Yes
50876
570
No
50916
732
No
80734
886
No
51012
314
No
51168
998
Yes
51336
1,035
No
A-27
Jurisdiction
FIPS
Population
Assessment
51396
944
No
City of Newark
50772
1,011
No
City of Newcastle
50868
567
Yes
City of Newton
51372
2,447
Yes
City of Neylandville
51444
58
No
City of Niederwald
51492
632
Yes
City of Nixon
51588
2,204
No
City of Nocona
51648
3,213
Yes
City of Nolanville
51708
2,171
Yes
City of Nome
51720
510
Yes
City of Noonday
51756
534
No
City of Nordheim
51792
322
No
City of Normangee
51840
744
No
51984
278
No
52356
59,186
Yes
City of Novice
52668
137
Yes
52902
777
No
53115
1,253
Yes
53130
2,107
No
53154
254
Yes
53190
3,086
No
City of Oakhurst
52992
241
No
City of Oakwood
53232
485
No
City of O'Brien
53304
130
Yes
City of Odem
53376
2,463
No
City of Odessa
53388
90,961
Yes
City of O'Donnell
53436
983
Yes
City of Oglesby
53520
456
Yes
A-28
Jurisdiction
FIPS
Population
Assessment
53824
1,850
No
53988
2,317
Yes
City of Olney
54000
3,319
Yes
City of Olton
54012
2,301
No
City of Omaha
54024
999
No
City of Onalaska
54048
1,271
Yes
54075
195
No
City of Orange
54132
18,198
Yes
54168
1,318
Yes
City of Orchard
54192
441
No
54216
1,138
No
City of Overton
54432
2,334
No
City of Ovilla
54444
3,585
Yes
54528
1,231
No
City of Paducah
54600
1,409
Yes
54636
308
Yes
City of Palacios
54684
5,238
No
City of Palestine
54708
17,731
No
City of Palisades
54726
364
No
City of Palmer
54744
1,910
No
City of Palmhurst
54780
4,960
No
City of Palmview
54804
4,293
No
City of Pampa
54912
17,312
Yes
City of Panhandle
54960
2,601
Yes
55008
2,125
Yes
City of Paradise
55056
492
No
City of Paris
55080
26,212
Yes
City of Parker
55152
1,672
No
A-29
Jurisdiction
FIPS
Population
Assessment
City of Pasadena
56000
145,034
Yes
City of Pattison
56108
452
Yes
56156
1,481
No
56276
700
No
City of Pearland
56348
44,540
Yes
City of Pearsall
56384
7,105
Yes
56468
217
Yes
56485
697
No
56640
1,605
No
City of Penelope
56672
219
Yes
City of Penitas
56696
1,175
No
City of Perryton
56912
7,827
Yes
City of Petersburg
56996
1,231
Yes
City of Petrolia
57044
814
Yes
City of Petronila
57056
82
No
City of Pflugerville
57176
23,072
Yes
City of Pharr
57200
51,278
Yes
57476
3,818
No
57524
630
Yes
57615
853
Yes
City of Pinehurst
57608
2,245
Yes
City of Pineland
57644
926
No
57800
3,464
Yes
City of Pittsburg
57908
4,328
Yes
City of Plains
57968
1,440
Yes
City of Plainview
57980
21,916
Yes
City of Plano
58016
238,091
Yes
City of Pleasanton
58280
8,732
Yes
A-30
Jurisdiction
FIPS
Population
Assessment
58448
982
No
City of Point
58532
890
No
58556
575
Yes
58568
767
Yes
58808
3,505
Yes
58820
56,885
Yes
58892
5,174
No
58916
11,939
Yes
58940
13,338
Yes
City of Portland
58904
15,422
Yes
City of Post
59012
3,796
No
59066
426
No
City of Poteet
59084
3,464
No
City of Poth
59096
1,959
Yes
City of Pottsboro
59132
1,619
Yes
City of Powell
59168
108
No
City of Poynor
59192
322
No
59336
4,486
Yes
City of Premont
59384
2,795
No
City of Presidio
59396
4,555
No
City of Primera
59540
2,954
No
City of Princeton
59576
3,728
No
City of Progreso
59636
5,053
No
59642
242
No
City of Putnam
59984
85
No
City of Pyote
59996
128
No
City of Quanah
60044
2,860
Yes
60080
1,593
No
A-31
Jurisdiction
FIPS
Population
Assessment
City of Quinlan
60140
1,422
No
City of Quitaque
60176
413
Yes
City of Quitman
60188
2,065
Yes
City of Ralls
60356
2,184
Yes
City of Ranger
60632
2,542
Yes
City of Rangerville
60644
204
No
City of Rankin
60668
777
Yes
City of Ravenna
60752
222
No
City of Raymondville
60836
9,630
No
61172
852
No
61196
5,458
Yes
City of Redwater
61340
884
Yes
City of Reklaw
61508
328
No
City of Reno
61604
2,595
No
City of Reno
61592
2,823
No
City of Retreat
61616
352
No
City of Rhome
61700
682
No
City of Rice
61736
860
No
City of Richardson
61796
96,956
Yes
City of Richland
61820
304
No
61844
8,204
Yes
61880
342
Yes
City of Richmond
61892
11,863
Yes
City of Richwood
61904
3,123
No
City of Riesel
62108
986
No
62138
5,657
No
62168
12,603
Yes
62180
2,019
No
A-32
Jurisdiction
FIPS
Population
Assessment
62240
686
No
62252
829
Yes
62384
7,049
Yes
City of Riverside
62408
425
No
City of Roanoke
62504
3,339
Yes
62528
247
No
62564
1,157
Yes
City of Robinson
62588
8,220
Yes
City of Robstown
62600
12,608
Yes
City of Roby
62612
659
Yes
City of Rochester
62636
368
Yes
City of Rockdale
62672
5,439
Yes
City of Rockport
62804
8,192
Yes
City of Rocksprings
62816
1,243
Yes
City of Rockwall
62828
22,334
Yes
62870
96
No
City of Rogers
62924
1,097
Yes
City of Rollingwood
63008
1,382
Yes
City of Roma
63020
10,135
Yes
63044
1,975
No
City of Ropesville
63140
519
Yes
City of Roscoe
63176
1,316
Yes
63200
519
Yes
63272
483
Yes
City of Rosebud
63188
1,443
Yes
City of Rosenberg
63284
27,136
Yes
City of Ross
63380
233
No
City of Rotan
63464
1,561
Yes
A-33
Jurisdiction
FIPS
Population
Assessment
63500
73,858
Yes
City of Rowlett
63572
49,908
Yes
City of Roxton
63584
698
Yes
63668
3,579
No
City of Rule
63752
674
Yes
63782
1,199
Yes
City of Runge
63788
1,084
No
City of Rusk
63848
5,228
No
City of Sabinal
64004
1,627
Yes
City of Sachse
64064
13,015
No
City of Sadler
64088
419
No
City of Saginaw
64112
15,389
Yes
64172
1,968
No
64472
87,423
Yes
65000
1,194,222
Yes
65024
2,480
Yes
65036
24,068
No
65180
4,671
Yes
65516
28,182
Yes
65600
41,602
Yes
65612
318
No
65636
678
No
65648
2,680
Yes
City of Sanctuary
65066
273
No
City of Sanford
65384
199
No
City of Sanger
65408
5,006
No
65660
4,216
No
65672
1,042
Yes
A-34
Jurisdiction
FIPS
Population
Assessment
65690
924
No
City of Santa Fe
65726
10,019
Yes
65768
2,863
No
City of Savoy
66008
861
Yes
City of Schertz
66128
20,762
Yes
City of Schulenburg
66188
2,747
Yes
City of Scotland
66284
449
Yes
City of Scottsville
66332
268
No
City of Seabrook
66392
10,177
Yes
City of Seadrift
66416
1,376
No
City of Seagoville
66428
11,094
Yes
City of Seagraves
66440
2,282
Yes
City of Sealy
66464
5,563
Yes
City of Seguin
66644
22,741
Yes
City of Selma
66704
1,159
No
City of Seminole
66764
5,803
Yes
66884
142
Yes
66908
1,211
No
City of Seymour
66968
2,785
Yes
City of Shallowater
67136
2,153
Yes
City of Shamrock
67160
1,914
Yes
67268
1,939
Yes
City of Shenandoah
67400
1,541
No
City of Shepherd
67424
2,138
Yes
City of Sherman
67496
35,788
Yes
City of Shiner
67640
2,032
Yes
City of Shoreacres
67688
1,554
No
City of Silsbee
67832
6,451
Yes
A-35
Jurisdiction
FIPS
Population
Assessment
City of Silverton
67904
740
No
City of Simonton
67964
788
No
City of Sinton
68036
5,590
No
City of Slaton
68180
6,047
Yes
City of Smiley
68300
465
No
City of Smithville
68456
4,242
Yes
City of Smyer
68504
483
Yes
City of Snook
68576
582
No
City of Snyder
68624
10,415
Yes
City of Socorro
68636
27,964
No
City of Somerset
68708
1,669
No
City of Somerville
68720
1,736
No
City of Sonora
68756
2,959
Yes
68828
1,679
Yes
69020
16,142
No
69120
411
Yes
City of Southlake
69032
23,767
Yes
City of Southmayd
69104
1,052
No
69272
1,605
Yes
City of Spearman
69476
2,972
Yes
City of Splendora
69548
1,374
No
City of Spofford
69560
75
Yes
69812
3,669
Yes
City of Springtown
69800
2,299
No
City of Spur
69848
1,057
Yes
City of Stafford
69908
17,935
Yes
City of Stagecoach
69932
480
No
City of Stamford
69980
3,447
Yes
A-36
Jurisdiction
FIPS
Population
Assessment
City of Stanton
70040
2,485
Yes
70076
422
No
City of Stephenville
70208
14,894
Yes
70232
1,048
Yes
City of Stinnett
70340
1,889
Yes
City of Stockdale
70376
1,468
Yes
City of Stratford
70544
2,072
No
City of Strawn
70580
744
No
City of Streetman
70604
207
No
City of Sudan
70772
1,040
No
70808
68,599
Yes
70868
4,137
No
70904
14,612
Yes
71356
53
Yes
City of Sundown
71060
1,530
Yes
City of Sunray
71180
1,961
No
71228
741
Yes
City of Sunset
71264
345
Yes
71324
468
Yes
City of Sweeny
71492
3,684
No
City of Sweetwater
71540
10,937
Yes
City of Taft
71684
3,458
No
City of Tahoka
71708
2,794
Yes
City of Talco
71732
571
No
City of Tatum
71924
1,181
No
City of Taylor
71948
14,062
Yes
71960
3,695
No
City of Teague
72020
4,652
No
A-37
Jurisdiction
FIPS
Population
Assessment
City of Tehuacana
72080
311
No
City of Temple
72176
54,447
Yes
City of Tenaha
72188
1,061
No
City of Terrell
72284
15,147
No
72296
5,044
Yes
City of Texarkana
72368
35,205
Yes
72392
43,063
Yes
City of Texhoma
72464
377
No
City of Texline
72476
511
Yes
72530
32,257
Yes
City of Thorndale
72776
1,304
Yes
City of Thornton
72788
531
No
City of Thrall
72824
790
Yes
72872
1,805
Yes
City of Throckmorton
72896
834
Yes
City of Timpson
73076
1,100
Yes
City of Tioga
73112
819
Yes
City of Tira
73124
249
No
City of Toco
73196
89
No
73224
156
No
City of Tolar
73268
535
No
73328
967
Yes
City of Tomball
73316
9,725
Yes
City of Tool
73352
2,307
No
City of Toyah
73496
95
Yes
City of Trent
73580
312
No
City of Trenton
73592
665
Yes
City of Trinidad
73652
1,104
No
A-38
Jurisdiction
FIPS
Population
Assessment
City of Trinity
73664
2,739
Yes
City of Troup
73724
1,997
Yes
City of Troy
73748
1,369
Yes
City of Tulia
73868
4,918
Yes
City of Turkey
73964
482
Yes
City of Tuscola
74048
725
Yes
City of Tye
74132
1,163
No
City of Tyler
74144
87,030
Yes
City of Uhland
74216
408
Yes
City of Uncertain
74240
149
No
74312
358
No
74408
15,073
Yes
74492
23,817
Yes
City of Uvalde
74588
15,179
Yes
City of Valentine
74648
185
No
74732
1,132
No
City of Van
74912
2,446
No
74924
2,579
Yes
City of Vega
75188
919
No
City of Venus
75236
2,069
No
City of Vernon
75308
11,044
Yes
City of Victoria
75428
61,031
Yes
City of Vidor
75476
11,302
Yes
City of Waco
76000
115,749
Yes
City of Waelder
76024
969
Yes
76096
5,175
Yes
City of Waller
76228
2,072
Yes
City of Wallis
76240
1,210
No
A-39
Jurisdiction
FIPS
Population
Assessment
76348
776
Yes
76576
344
No
City of Waskom
76636
2,092
No
City of Watauga
76672
23,376
Yes
City of Waxahachie
76816
23,059
Yes
City of Weatherford
76864
20,619
Yes
City of Webster
76948
9,158
Yes
City of Weimar
77020
1,960
Yes
City of Weinert
77044
172
No
City of Weir
77056
628
Yes
City of Wellington
77152
2,189
No
City of Wellman
77164
204
No
City of Wells
77176
791
No
City of Weslaco
77272
29,094
Yes
City of West
77332
2,694
Yes
77416
4,308
No
77632
3,065
Yes
77752
4,045
Yes
77896
1,579
No
77956
14,908
Yes
City of Westbrook
77380
195
No
City of Westminster
77680
410
No
City of Weston
77740
663
No
78064
2,122
No
City of Wharton
78136
9,386
Yes
City of Wheeler
78208
1,307
Yes
78316
1,071
Yes
78436
5,786
Yes
A-40
Jurisdiction
FIPS
Population
Assessment
78544
15,154
No
City of Whiteface
78328
436
No
City of Whitehouse
78388
6,235
Yes
City of Whitesboro
78532
3,919
Yes
City of Whitewright
78628
1,759
Yes
City of Whitney
78664
1,931
Yes
79000
102,926
Yes
City of Wickett
79036
436
Yes
City of Willis
79408
4,169
No
79492
3,069
No
79564
3,611
Yes
City of Wilmer
79576
3,651
Yes
City of Wilson
79612
512
No
City of Windcrest
79672
5,110
Yes
City of Windthorst
79696
444
Yes
City of Winfield
79720
515
No
City of Wink
79768
893
Yes
City of Winnsboro
79816
3,667
Yes
City of Winona
79828
595
Yes
City of Winters
79876
2,800
Yes
79919
232
No
79948
1,606
Yes
City of Wolfforth
79972
2,655
Yes
80044
1,356
No
City of Woodcreek
80058
1,367
Yes
City of Woodloch
80144
253
No
City of Woodson
80188
276
Yes
City of Woodville
80212
2,355
Yes
A-41
Jurisdiction
FIPS
Population
Assessment
City of Woodway
80224
8,721
Yes
City of Wortham
80296
1,098
No
City of Wylie
80356
18,380
Yes
City of Yantis
80440
336
Yes
City of Yoakum
80560
5,715
Yes
City of Yorktown
80584
2,242
Yes
City of Zavalla
80728
652
Yes
Clay County
48077
5,710
Yes
Cochran County
48079
957
Yes
Coke County
48081
1,620
Yes
Coleman County
48083
2,717
Yes
Collin County
48085
33,801
Yes
Collingsworth County
48087
802
No
Colorado County
48089
10,884
Yes
Comal County
48091
39,089
Yes
Comanche County
48093
6,478
Yes
Concho County
48095
1,032
Yes
Cooke County
48097
17,814
Yes
Coryell County
48099
28,766
Yes
Cottle County
48101
388
Yes
Crane County
48103
787
Yes
Crockett County
48105
3,807
Yes
Crosby County
48107
1,540
Yes
Culberson County
48109
502
Yes
Dallam County
48111
1,051
No
Dallas County
48113
8,231
Yes
Dawson County
48115
4,754
Yes
48117
3,973
Yes
A-42
Jurisdiction
FIPS
Population
Assessment
Delta County
48119
3,025
Yes
Denton County
48121
37,650
Yes
DeWitt County
48123
8,733
Yes
DFW Airport
19004
160,000
Yes
Dickens County
48125
1,319
Yes
Dimmit County
48127
2,578
Yes
Donley County
48129
1,065
Yes
Duval County
48131
4,176
Yes
Eastland County
48133
5,820
Yes
Ector County
48135
32,189
Yes
Edwards County
48137
838
Yes
El Paso County
48141
47,056
Yes
Ellis County
48139
78,539
Yes
Erath County
48143
14,489
No
Falls County
48145
9,193
Yes
Fannin County
48147
14,023
Yes
Fayette County
48149
12,988
Yes
Fisher County
48151
2,026
Yes
Floyd County
48153
2,054
Yes
Foard County
48155
460
Yes
48157
168,915
Yes
Franklin County
48159
6,634
Yes
Freestone County
48161
9,165
Yes
Frio County
48163
4,978
Yes
Gaines County
48165
6,226
Yes
Galveston County
48167
31,388
Yes
Garza County
48169
1,180
Yes
Gillespie County
48171
12,261
Yes
A-43
Jurisdiction
FIPS
Population
Assessment
Glasscock County
48173
1,369
Yes
Goliad County
48175
5,067
Yes
Gonzales County
48177
8,002
Yes
Gray County
48179
3,418
Yes
Grayson County
48181
34,696
Yes
Gregg County
48183
19,668
Yes
Grimes County
48185
17,159
Yes
Guadalupe County
48187
44,025
Yes
Hale County
48189
8,382
Yes
Hall County
48191
474
Yes
Hamilton County
48193
3,657
Yes
Hansford County
48195
1,175
No
Hardeman County
48197
871
Yes
Hardin County
48199
29,356
Yes
Harris County
48201
1,131,952
Yes
Harrison County
48203
31,348
No
Hartley County
48205
2,572
Yes
Haskell County
48207
1,520
Yes
Hays County
48209
48,333
Yes
Hemphill County
48211
1,119
Yes
Henderson County
48213
42,891
Yes
Hidalgo County
48215
193,725
Yes
Hill County
48217
17,479
Yes
Hockley County
48219
6,001
Yes
Hood County
48221
34,012
Yes
Hopkins County
48223
16,188
Yes
Houston County
48225
13,499
Yes
Howard County
48227
7,259
Yes
A-44
Jurisdiction
FIPS
Population
Assessment
Hudspeth County
48229
2,926
Yes
Hunt County
48231
37,671
Yes
Hutchinson County
48233
5,111
Yes
Irion County
48235
923
Yes
Jack County
48237
3,844
Yes
Jackson County
48239
6,394
Yes
Jasper County
48241
25,859
Yes
48243
2,026
Yes
Jefferson County
48245
30,461
Yes
48247
5,173
Yes
48249
15,803
Yes
Johnson County
48251
67,757
Yes
Jones County
48253
5,810
Yes
Karnes County
48255
6,867
Yes
Kaufman County
48257
36,858
Yes
Kendall County
48259
18,052
Yes
Kenedy County
48261
419
No
Kent County
48263
323
Yes
Kerr County
48265
21,973
Yes
48902
893
Yes
Kimble County
48267
1,871
Yes
King County
48269
333
Yes
Kinney County
48271
1,460
Yes
Kleberg County
48273
5,950
Yes
Knox County
48275
876
Yes
La Salle County
48281
2,844
Yes
Lamar County
48283
9,554
Yes
Lamb County
48277
1,630
Yes
A-45
Jurisdiction
FIPS
Population
Assessment
Lampasas County
48279
17,080
Yes
Lavaca County
48285
10,082
Yes
Lee County
48287
9,822
Yes
Leon County
48289
10,601
Yes
Liberty County
48291
45,992
Yes
Limestone County
48293
9,166
Yes
Lipscomb County
48295
616
No
48297
7,578
Yes
Llano County
48299
13,558
Yes
Loving County
48301
64
Yes
Lubbock County
48303
27,881
Yes
Lynn County
48305
1,831
Yes
Madison County
48313
1,608
Yes
Marion County
48315
14,266
No
Martin County
48317
25,145
Yes
Mason County
48319
2,448
Yes
Matagorda County
48321
37,748
Yes
Maverick County
48323
856
Yes
McCulloch County
48307
8,574
Yes
McLennan County
48309
9,078
Yes
McMullen County
48311
2,054
Yes
Medina County
48325
22,330
Yes
Menard County
48327
697
Yes
Midland County
48329
20,801
Yes
Milam County
48331
11,567
Yes
Mills County
48333
3,163
Yes
Mitchell County
48335
4,493
Yes
Montague County
48337
9,484
Yes
A-46
Jurisdiction
FIPS
Population
Assessment
Montgomery County
48339
268,051
Yes
Moore County
48341
1,925
Yes
Morris County
48343
6,636
Yes
Motley County
48345
394
Yes
Nacogdoches County
48347
26,905
Yes
Navarro County
48349
13,388
Yes
Newton County
48351
12,499
Yes
Nolan County
48353
2,576
Yes
Nueces County
48355
15,051
Yes
Ochiltree County
48357
1,212
Yes
Oldham County
48359
1,080
Yes
Orange County
48361
38,774
Yes
48363
10,481
Yes
Panola County
48365
14,920
Yes
Parker County
48367
55,348
Yes
Parmer County
48369
2,886
Yes
Pecos County
48371
7,618
Yes
Polk County
48373
34,745
Yes
Potter County
48375
14,293
Yes
Presidio County
48377
1,021
Yes
Rains County
48379
7,351
Yes
Randall County
48381
16,742
Yes
Reagan County
48383
422
Yes
Real County
48385
1,825
Yes
48387
7,298
Yes
Reeves County
48389
2,935
Yes
Refugio County
48391
2,660
Yes
Roberts County
48393
288
Yes
A-47
Jurisdiction
FIPS
Population
Assessment
Robertson County
48395
7,594
Yes
Rockwall County
48397
9,356
Yes
Runnels County
48399
3,404
Yes
Rusk County
48401
28,960
Yes
Sabine County
48403
8,361
Yes
48405
6,256
No
48407
19,579
Yes
48409
15,225
Yes
48411
3,126
Yes
Schleicher County
48413
989
Yes
Scurry County
48415
5,462
Yes
Shackelford County
48417
1,167
Yes
Shelby County
48419
16,421
Yes
Sherman County
48421
836
No
Smith County
48423
76,223
Yes
Somervell County
48425
4,902
No
Starr County
48427
32,671
Yes
Stephens County
48429
3,763
Yes
Sterling County
48431
298
Yes
Stonewall County
48433
585
Yes
Sutton County
48435
1,158
Yes
Swisher County
48437
1,763
Yes
Tarrant County
48439
33,218
Yes
Taylor County
48441
10,356
Yes
Terrell County
48443
998
Yes
Terry County
48445
2,429
Yes
Throckmorton County
48447
601
Yes
48903
1,288
Yes
A-48
Jurisdiction
FIPS
Population
Assessment
Titus County
48449
13,020
Yes
48451
15,595
Yes
Town of Addison
1240
14,117
Yes
Town of Annetta
3336
1,157
No
3342
579
No
Town of Anthony
3432
3,980
No
Town of Bartonville
5768
1,252
No
Town of Bayside
6104
351
No
Town of Bayview
6140
358
No
Town of Broaddus
10384
186
No
Town of Buckholts
11020
400
Yes
11128
449
Yes
Town of Chireno
14776
399
No
Town of Clint
15544
985
No
Town of Combes
16204
2,830
Yes
16636
1,254
No
17852
626
No
17917
292
No
18260
1,222
No
Town of Darrouzett
19288
305
No
21028
2,481
No
22588
2,575
Yes
24228
374
No
Town of Fairview
25224
3,405
Yes
26232
58,642
Yes
Town of Fulton
27888
1,606
No
Town of Hackberry
31715
467
No
33476
2,437
No
A-49
Jurisdiction
FIPS
Population
Assessment
33824
8,920
No
34628
3,035
Yes
34832
6,707
No
35918
571
No
Town of Lakeside
40744
1,118
No
Town of Lindsay
42868
851
No
43012
9,147
No
46782
470
No
51036
692
No
Town of Northlake
52212
995
No
53160
521
No
53217
422
No
54798
1,292
No
Town of Pantego
55020
2,357
Yes
Town of Pecos
56516
8,945
Yes
58400
395
Yes
Town of Ponder
58664
660
No
Town of Prosper
59696
2,612
Yes
Town of Quintana
60164
39
No
60544
1,762
No
60672
1,054
Yes
Town of Refugio
61436
2,860
No
63476
116
No
63524
78
Yes
Town of Saint Jo
64184
964
Yes
64220
709
No
65372
902
No
67100
1,712
No
A-50
Jurisdiction
FIPS
Population
Assessment
Town of Skellytown
68120
620
Yes
69140
2,442
Yes
Town of Springlake
69764
139
No
Town of Sunnyvale
71156
3,498
No
Town of Talty
80736
1,113
No
Town of Thompsons
72740
256
No
Town of Thorntonville
72800
428
No
73710
7,027
Yes
74756
777
No
75032
2,337
No
Town of Westlake
77620
209
Yes
77788
680
Yes
Town of Windom
79684
246
No
Town of Woodsboro
80176
1,663
No
Travis County
48453
140,768
Yes
Trinity County
48455
10,227
Yes
Tyler County
48457
17,490
Yes
Upshur County
48459
25,596
No
Upton County
48461
779
Yes
Uvalde County
48463
9,702
Yes
48465
11,292
Yes
48467
35,432
Yes
Victoria County
48469
23,901
Yes
6242
371
No
7156
778
No
Village of Bonney
9388
409
No
Village of Briarcliff
10197
860
No
11155
495
No
A-51
Jurisdiction
FIPS
Population
Assessment
Village of Fairchilds
25068
739
No
37252
1,073
Yes
37984
2,173
No
40336
2,024
No
40804
833
No
56840
262
No
Village of Pleak
58088
1,024
Yes
Village of Rosser
63404
409
No
Village of Salado
64268
1,951
Yes
65552
390
No
71384
775
Yes
72578
1,871
No
72989
1,105
Yes
73030
445
No
Village of Vinton
75668
1,972
No
Village of Wimberley
79624
2,685
Yes
Walker County
48471
25,289
Yes
Waller County
48473
16,515
Yes
Ward County
48475
2,210
Yes
Washington County
48477
16,701
Yes
Webb County
48479
6,807
Yes
Wharton County
48481
21,054
Yes
Wheeler County
48483
1,697
Yes
Wichita County
48485
6,111
Yes
Wilbarger County
48487
2,983
Yes
Willacy County
48489
7,729
No
Williamson County
48491
98,285
Yes
Wilson County
48493
23,822
Yes
A-52
Jurisdiction
FIPS
Population
Assessment
Winkler County
48495
531
Yes
Wise County
48497
32,834
No
Wood County
48499
26,222
Yes
Yoakum County
48501
1,901
Yes
Young County
48503
5,258
Yes
Zapata County
48505
12,788
No
Zavala County
48507
4,442
Yes
A-53
A-54
Texas Homeland Security Strategic Plan - Part II- Goals and Objectives
Link to Domestic Preparedness Assessment Handbook
Texas
Homeland
Security
Strategic
Plan
Part III
State of Texas Emergency Management Plan
Rick Perry, Governor
January 30, 2004
This plan applies to all State agencies, boards, commissions, and departments assigned
emergency responsibilities in this plan, and to others as designated by the Governor or Director
of the Governors Division of Emergency Management as well as local governments in Texas.
The Director, Governors Division of Emergency Management, will provide guidance and
direction to the State Coordinator, Governors Division of Emergency Management, in the
conduct of emergency response and disaster recovery activities.
This plan is hereby approved for implementation and supersedes all previous editions.
Pursuant to The Texas Disaster Act of 1975, Government Code 418.042, 418.043(13), and
418.173(a), failure to comply with this plan or a rule, order, or ordinance adopted under this plan
is an offense punishable, for each transaction, by penalty of a fine up to $1,000.00 or
confinement in jail for a term not exceeding 180 days.
Date
______________________________________
Governor
______________________________________
Director
Governors Division of Emergency Management
______________________________________
State Coordinator
Governors Division of Emergency Management
Texas Homeland Security Strategic Plan - Part III - State of Texas Emergency Management Plan (Rev 5)
i
RECORD OF CHANGES
STATE OF TEXAS EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PLAN
CHANGE NUMBER
DATE OF CHANGE
Texas Homeland Security Strategic Plan - Part III - State of Texas Emergency Management Plan (Rev 5)
ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
AUTHORITY ......................................................................................................... 1
I.
A. STATE
.................................................................................................................... 1
B. FEDERAL .................................................................................................................... 1
C. MUTUAL AID AGREEMENTS AND CONTINGENCY PLANS ....................................... 2
II.
PURPOSE
......................................................................................................... 2
III.
IV.
V.
Texas Homeland Security Strategic Plan - Part III - State of Texas Emergency Management Plan (Rev 5)
iii
2. ORGANIZATIONS ........................................................................................................... 26
3. FACILITIES ................................................................................................................... 36
VI.
VII.
VIII.
IX.
GENERAL .................................................................................................................... 42
LINES OF SUCCESSION ............................................................................................... 43
PRE-DELEGATION OF EMERGENCY AUTHORITIES................................................. 43
EMERGENCY ACTION STEPS...................................................................................... 44
ALTERNATE OPERATING FACILITIES ......................................................................... 44
PROTECTION OF GOVERNMENT RESOURCES ........................................................ 44
PROTECTION OF VITAL RECORDS ............................................................................ 44
X.
SUPPORT .................................................................................................................... 45
AGREEMENTS AND UNDERSTANDINGS.................................................................... 45
REPORTS AND RECORDS ........................................................................................... 45
EXPENDITURES AND RECORD KEEPING .................................................................. 45
CRITIQUES .................................................................................................................... 46
ATTACHMENTS
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Texas Homeland Security Strategic Plan - Part III - State of Texas Emergency Management Plan (Rev 5)
iv
EXPLANATION OF TERMS
A. ACRONYMS
AGD
ARC
BPC
CAP
CERT
CIPC
COG
COOP
CPA
DADS
DARS
DDC
DFO
DPFS
DHS
DIR
DPS
DRC
DSHS
EAS
EMAC
EMC
EOC
ERN
ERT-A
ESC
ESF
FCO
FEMA
FRP
FRERP
GAR
GDEM
GLO
HCA
HSAS
Texas Homeland Security Strategic Plan- Part III - State of Texas Emergency Management Plan (Rev 5)
ICP
JIC
JOC
JRIES
MHMR
NAWS
NCP
NLETS
NRP
OAG
ORCA
PUC
ROC
RRC
RRP
RSA
SAO
SAC
SCO
SEMC
SERC
SERT
SOC
TAHC
TCEQ
TCFP
TDA
TDCJ
TDH
TDI
TEA
TEEX
TFS
TEWAS
TIPCC
TLETS
TPWD
TRC
TSA
TSAAC
TSMPS
TWC
Texas Homeland Security Strategic Plan - Part III - State of Texas Emergency Management Plan (Rev 5)
vi
TXDOT
Department of Transportation
US DHS
US EPA
US NRC
B. DEFINITIONS
Critical Infrastructure: Public or private assets, systems, and functions vital to the security,
governance, public health and safety, economy, or morale of the state or the nation.
Emergency: The occurrence or imminent threat of a condition, situation, or event that
requires immediate response actions to save lives; prevent injuries; protect property, public
health, the environment, and public safety; or to lessen or avert the threat of a disaster. An
emergency is a situation larger in scope and more severe in terms of actual or potential
effects than an incident. The local Emergency Operations Center (EOC) is typically activated
to mobilize local resources, coordinate external resource support, conduct mid- and long-term
planning, and disseminate emergency public information. Some technical assistance or
resources may be requested from the State; the local Disaster District EOC and the State
Operations Center (SOC) are typically activated to monitor and respond to the situation.
Emergency situations: This term is used in this Plan when the intent is to describe a full
range of crisis situations from incidents at the low end of the crisis spectrum to disasters
at the high end of spectrum.
Disaster: The occurrence or imminent threat of widespread or severe damage, injury, loss of
life or property that is beyond the capability of the governments within the affected area to
resolve with their resources. Local EOCs are activated to carry out the functions described
above. State and/or federal response assistance will be needed to resolve the situation and
carry out recovery activities. One or more Disaster District EOCs and the State Operations
Center (SOC) will be fully activated to respond to the disaster.
Homeland Security Activity: Any activity related to the prevention or discovery of, response
to, or recovery from a terrorist attack, natural or manmade disaster, hostile or paramilitary
action, or extraordinary law enforcement emergency.
Incident: An emergency situation that is limited in scope and potential effects on lives and
property and is typically handled by one or two local response agencies acting under an
incident commander. An incident may require limited external assistance from other local
response forces. The local EOC is usually not activated.
Texas Homeland Security Strategic Plan - Part III - State of Texas Emergency Management Plan (Rev 5)
vii
Texas Homeland Security Strategic Plan - Part III - State of Texas Emergency Management Plan (Rev 5)
viii
STATE OF TEXAS
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PLAN
I.
AUTHORITY
This plan applies to emergency management operations in the State of Texas and supersedes all
previous editions. Strategic planning guidance and authorities governing its enactment and
implementation include:
A. STATE
1. Constitution of the State of Texas.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Chapter 778 (Emergency Management Assistance Compact), Health and Safety Code.
8.
9.
Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, Public Law 93-288, as
amended.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Texas Homeland Security Strategic Plan - Part III - State of Texas Emergency Management Plan (Rev 5)
1
8.
2.
3.
4.
5.
This plan has been prepared by the Governors Division of Emergency Management
(GDEM) pursuant to 418.042 of the Government Code, which requires that GDEM
prepare and keep current a comprehensive emergency management plan, and Chapter
421 (Homeland Security) of the Government Code. A comprehensive emergency
management plan describes how the State will mitigate against, prepare for, respond to,
and recover from the impact of hazards to public health and safety, including natural
disasters, technological accidents, homeland security threats, and other emergency
situations.
2.
This plan establishes operational concepts and identifies tasks and responsibilities
required to carry out a comprehensive emergency management program. It describes
the States emergency management organization and a statewide system of direction
and control. It indicates who is expected to do what, when, where, and how to prevent
and manage emergency situations. It defines the specific duties and responsibilities of
departments, agencies, and organizations represented on the Emergency Management
Council and provides for coordination of appropriate preparedness, mitigation, response,
and recovery actions with both the federal government and with local governments.
3.
This plan addresses the steps necessary to ensure continuity of our representative form
of government in the event of a major disaster as well as the continuity of the operation of
State government and local governments to provide protection and essential services to
the citizens of the State.
4.
Texas Homeland Security Strategic Plan - Part III - State of Texas Emergency Management Plan (Rev 5)
2
national strategy established by the President in the National Strategy for Homeland
Security. The Texas Homeland Security Strategic Plan sets three general objectives:
a.
b.
c.
This plan provides for the employment of state resources in partnership with local
governments, industry, volunteer groups, and the federal government to carry out
operational strategies to achieve homeland security and emergency management
objectives and should be considered as Part III of the Texas Homeland Security Strategic
Plan.
2.
3.
4.
Relationship to Federal Contingency Plans. This plan provides for integration of state
response operations with the federal agencies responding to emergency situations in
Texas at the request of the Governor pursuant to the Federal Response Plan (FRP), the
Federal Radiological Emergency Preparedness Plan (FRERP), the National Contingency
Plan (NCP) and other federal contingency plans. These three federal response plans are
in the process of being incorporated into a new National Response Plan.
5.
Texas Homeland Security Strategic Plan - Part III - State of Texas Emergency Management Plan (Rev 5)
3
The State of Texas Hazard Analysis, published by the GDEM, provides detailed
information concerning the occurrences and impact of hazards in Texas. The types of
hazards threatening this state include:
a.
b.
c.
Homeland Security threats, including attacks by foreign military forces and terrorists
with conventional, chemical, biological, nuclear, and radiological weapons; and
d.
Other threats, including civil unrest, strikes affecting production and distribution of
critical goods and services, and energy shortages.
2.
The federal government recognizes that an attack on the United States is possible by
foreign military forces, although that is presently considered highly unlikely; attacks by
terrorists are considered more likely. A large-scale military attack would likely be
preceded by a period of international tension that may provide strategic warning.
However, acts of terrorism can occur any place and at any time with little or no
warning.
3.
It is possible for emergency situations to occur at any time and at any place in the State
and all levels of government must be prepared to respond with little or no warning. For
emergency situations that develop slowly, such as riverine flooding, dissemination of
timely warning and implementation of preventive measures may be possible to reduce
the threat to lives and property. Similarly, dissemination of specific credible intelligence
on terrorist threats may aid local and state officials in preventing terrorist acts.
4.
The State of Texas has periodically experienced disasters that were so widespread or
severe that local and state and local resources were insufficient to meet response and
recovery needs. In these circumstances, the State has sought and received assistance
from the federal government and some other states. However, most large disaster
recovery programs are federal programs, and not all disasters that occur in Texas will
qualify for federal disaster assistance. In these cases, the State and volunteer groups
may be able to provide limited recovery assistance.
5.
Many of the threats facing the State have the potential to cause catastrophic damage,
mass casualties, and mass fatalities. The occurrence of a catastrophic disaster could
quickly overwhelm affected local governments and rapidly deplete state resources. It is
essential that all levels of government be prepared to continue to operate effectively
during crises and continue to ensure public safety, provide essential services, and
maintain uninterrupted direction and control capabilities.
6.
The Constitution of the State of Texas, as well as other state laws, requires the State and
Texas Homeland Security Strategic Plan - Part III - State of Texas Emergency Management Plan (Rev 5)
4
Effective pre-disaster mitigation, thorough preparedness, timely warning, and welltrained and equipped response forces can reduce the number of deaths and injuries
caused by a hazard. Effective pre-disaster mitigation can also reduce the amount of
damage to private and public property and facilities that results from a disaster.
8.
The ability of the State and local governments to respond to and provide for the safety
and welfare of the public during an emergency or disaster is directly influenced by the
effectiveness of preparedness, response, and continuity of government operations.
The ability of the State and local governments to recover and resume normal operations
following a disaster is directly influenced by the effectiveness of continuity of government,
continuity of operations, and recovery planning.
9.
The availability of critical emergency response and recovery capabilities and resources
can be expanded through employment of intrastate and interstate mutual aid. Local
governments are encouraged to enter into local and regional mutual aid agreements to
supplement their capabilities.
10. Although the State and local governments have a wide variety of emergency response
assets, both the State and many local governments also contract with industry for certain
specialized emergency response equipment, supplies, and services to supplement their
organic resources.
11. Elected officials in Texas do not have the authority to issue mandatory evacuation orders.
However, the Governor, mayors, and county judges may recommend evacuation of the
population and control ingress and egress to and from a disaster area.
B. ASSUMPTIONS
1.
The State and its political subdivisions will continue to experience emergency situations
and disasters that may cause death, injury, and damage, or may necessitate evacuation
and sheltering of the public at risk.
2.
3.
In the event of an enemy attack involving nuclear, chemical, or biological weapons, large
areas of the State could suffer catastrophic levels of deaths, casualties, physical
damages, and long-term contamination. To save lives, the Governor, at the request of
the President, may request that residents of possible target areas relocate to areas of
lower risk.
4.
Texas Homeland Security Strategic Plan - Part III - State of Texas Emergency Management Plan (Rev 5)
5
Local emergency operations, including mutual aid, will be directed by officials of the
local government, except in those situations where state law requires that a state
agency exercise lead responsibility or where local government personnel require
special expertise to cope with the problem(s) at hand.
6.
State resources may be committed when local resources, including mutual aid resources,
are inadequate to cope with an emergency situation or threat and a valid request for
supplemental state assistance is made by a mayor, county judge or their designee. To
insure that the most readily available sources of emergency assistance are fully
considered, cities must request assistance from their county before requesting
assistance from the State. If a state assistance team is operating to cope with a unique
emergency situation such as a hazardous material (hazmat) spill or radiological incident,
then the local chief elected official or his designee will be kept informed of progress in
responding to and rectifying the situation.
7.
A number of hazards that threaten Texas are capable of causing a catastrophic disaster.
The most probable is a Category 4 or greater hurricane, with sustained winds in excess
of 130 miles per hour, impacting heavily populated areas of the Texas Coast.
8.
The occurrence of a catastrophic event could cause such widespread damage to the
infrastructure that existing emergency response capabilities of state and local
governments are curtailed or are otherwise inadequate to the needs of the situation.
Such an event could result in governments being victims of the disaster and therefore
unable to adequately provide for the safety and welfare of the general public.
9.
10. Federal level response and recovery assistance will be necessary to provide for the
public safety before, during, and after a catastrophic event in Texas. It is expected that
federal assistance provided to Texas will be based upon specific requests and priorities
provided by the State.
11. Although this plan outlines procedures for coordinating the provision of supplemental
emergency assistance, it is essential for all levels of government to be prepared to carry
out emergency response and short-term recovery actions on an independent basis.
12. Actions should be taken to maintain a representative form of government in the State.
Emergency situations may cause the death of or injury to key elected and appointed
officials. Should this occur, emergency response operations will be more effective if lines
of succession have been pre-established that clearly identify who is in charge and what
emergency powers they are authorized to use.
13. Government offices, including emergency facilities, may be destroyed or become
inoperable during a major disaster. Emergency response operations will be more
effective if emergency facilities are protected and alternate sites for essential government
operations pre-selected. Having mobile emergency operations centers or command
posts available may also preserve operational capabilities.
Texas Homeland Security Strategic Plan - Part III - State of Texas Emergency Management Plan (Rev 5)
6
b.
3) Response: Response includes those actions that must be carried out when an
emergency exists or is imminent. It includes notifying key officials and warning
the public of emergency situations; activating emergency facilities; mobilizing,
deploying, and employing personnel, equipment, and supplies to resolve the
emergency situation; and providing emergency assistance to the affected local
population.
Texas Homeland Security Strategic Plan - Part III - State of Texas Emergency Management Plan (Rev 5)
8
Comprehensive resource planning should include public sector resources and those
private sector resources that can be reasonably expected to be made available,
either on a voluntary or paid basis, including resources of industry and volunteer
organizations, quasi-public resources, and donations. Similarly both intrastate and
interstate mutual aid resources and federal resource assistance should be
considered, where appropriate. All emergency organizations should have an
inventory of their major emergency resources or provisions for representatives of the
departments, agencies, and organizations that develop its plans and staff its
emergency operations facilities to provide current resource information.
b.
The emergency planning process provides for the development of the information
and intelligence needed both to develop realistic plans and to conduct effective
emergency operations. This effort should include:
b.
The State shall take the measures necessary to obtain and share intelligence and
operational information essential to conducting effective emergency management
operations with both the Federal government and with local governments. In the
case of homeland security threats, much of that intelligence is sensitive and must be
protected through effective safeguards. Effective information sharing provides
decision makers at all levels of government with a sound basis for making decisions
to posture and commit resources and implement plans and procedures.
C. OPERATIONAL GUIDANCE
1. Threat Monitoring
a.
The SOC will monitor the impact of natural and technological threat information,
including weather warnings, disseminated by federal authorities and other agencies
Texas Homeland Security Strategic Plan - Part III - State of Texas Emergency Management Plan (Rev 5)
9
as well as monitor the status of incidents that are reported by and being handled by
local officials that may require state assistance. The SOC also assesses the
potential impact of potential threats.
b.
State agencies are expected to monitor security threats reported by the industries
they regulate, and provide information on those threats to the Department of Public
Safety (DPS).
c.
The Texas Security Alert and Analysis Center (TSAAC) will analyze suspicious
incidents relating to homeland security reported by law enforcement agencies, share
information developed by the state with local governments, other states, and the US
Department of Homeland Security through the Joint Regional Intelligence
Exploitation System (JRIES) and respond to queries relating to such incidents.
The two general warning systems used by the State include the Texas Warning
System (TEWAS) and the Texas Law Enforcement Telecommunications System
(TLETS). The Emergency Response Network (ERN) is a specialized alerting system
for designated state and local officials. The Emergency Alert System (EAS) is the
primary warning system that can be used to provide short warning or information
messages directly to the public. Specialized agency communications systems that
may be used for certain types of warning include the Department of Healths Health
Alert Network, which reaches health professionals, and the Texas Education
Agencys Statewide Education Notification System, which reaches school officials.
b.
State Operations Center (SOC). The SOC operates 24 hours a day, 7 days a
week, but the level of staffing varies with the Emergency Readiness and Response
Level.
1) During Normal Conditions (Level 4), the permanent SOC staff operates the
facility.
Texas Homeland Security Strategic Plan - Part III - State of Texas Emergency Management Plan (Rev 5)
10
2) At Increased Readiness (Level 3), other member of the GDEM staff may
augment the SOC staff.
3) At Escalated Response (Level 2), GDEM SOC teams are activated to conduct
operations and the Emergency Management Council will be partially or fully
activated, and selected liaison personnel may be summoned.
4) At Emergency Conditions (Level 1), GDEM SOC teams operate the facility,
the full Council is typically convened, and liaison personnel are present.
GDEM SOPs for certain hazards provide specific guidance for activation of the
SOC for those hazards.
c.
d.
Incident Command Posts (ICPs). For most incidents and emergencies, local
governments will establish an incident command post at which state agencies and
organizations providing assistance will be represented. State incident command
posts may be established as needed for incidents for which the State has primary
responsibility, typically incidents that occur on state property.
e.
Local EOCs. Local EOCs are activated and deactivated as deemed necessary by
local officials.
f.
g.
h.
Disaster Recovery Centers (DRCs). Federal and state personnel at the DFO
coordinate on the locations for and opening and closing of DRCs.
Where the impact point of an impending threat is known with reasonable certainty
and precautionary deployment of personnel and equipment and prepositioning of
supplies can facilitate a rapid response, the State may preposition resources. The
State Coordinator will coordinate with the Governors Office regarding the
prepositioning of state resources. The Governor must approve the activation and
deployment of National Guard and State Guard assets.
Texas Homeland Security Strategic Plan - Part III - State of Texas Emergency Management Plan (Rev 5)
11
b.
In instances where a state agency wishes to pre-stage assets, the agency should
coordinate with the appropriate Disaster District chair and the SOC
c.
5. Interagency Coordination
a.
Coordination
1) The State will coordinate regularly with local governments, federal agencies,
volunteer groups, and industry during impending threats, response operations,
and recovery activities to coordinate actions, provide information, and resolve
issues.
2) The SOC and DDC EOCs are equipped to conduct telephone conference and
video teleconferences.
General coordination conferences are normally
conducted several times a day during emergency situations.
Separate
conference calls or video teleconferences may be conducted on specific
issues.
3) The DFO staff conducts periodic conference on disaster recovery and postdisaster mitigation issues.
b.
Situation Reporting
1) Local emergency plans provide that local EOCs will provide Situation Reports
(SITREPs) to their Disaster District during major emergencies and disasters.
2) Disaster Districts are required to provide SITREPs to the SOC during major
emergencies and disasters.
3) The SOC uses the SITREPs submitted by Disaster Districts and other
information to prepare state SITREPs, which are disseminated to the
Governors Office, legislators, state agencies, federal agencies, and volunteer
groups active in disasters.
c.
Liaison Personnel
b)
c)
d)
e)
f)
g)
h)
b.
c.
The DDC Chair is expected to validate the request for assistance and identify and
task resources available with the District to meet the need. Use of the National or
State Guard requires advance approval by the Governor, which will be coordinated
by the SOC. If a particular state agency is required by law to render assistance in a
certain type of emergency (e.g., oil spill, hazmat, animal disease outbreak,
radiological event, etc.), then direct communications between local government
officials and that state agency is appropriate; however, the DDC Chair must be kept
informed of the operational situation. If state assistance is authorized by the DDC
Chair or directed by statute, state agencies will provide response and recovery
assistance within their capabilities in accordance with state statutes and regulations
and this plan.
d.
Texas Homeland Security Strategic Plan - Part III - State of Texas Emergency Management Plan (Rev 5)
13
e.
f.
When state resources are insufficient to deal with an emergency situation, the SOC
senior staff will coordinate with the Governors Office to request specific assistance
from other states or the federal government.
2)
The SEMC consists of both state agencies and volunteer organizations named to
the Council by the Governor in the Executive Order Relating to Emergency
Management. (See Attachment 1 for SEMC membership.)
b.
1) Primary agencies coordinate the activities of their ESFs to develop and maintain
appropriate annexes to this plan, and related materials and procedures. (See
Attachment 8 for annex assignments.) Primary agencies are also responsible
for coordinating emergency response and recovery activities through the
established state emergency direction and control system as outlined in this
plan, and for providing inputs for operational reports and other documentation in
accordance with this plan and current procedures.
2) State "support" agencies in each ESF are responsible for assisting designated
primary agencies in accomplishing appropriate functional responsibilities and
tasks in accordance with this plan and current procedures. Additionally, they
are responsible for providing information and appropriate documentation as
requested by designated primary agencies.
Texas Homeland Security Strategic Plan - Part III - State of Texas Emergency Management Plan (Rev 5)
14
c.
This approach requires no radical organizational changes because, for the most
part, the state departments or agencies that are responsible for certain functions on
a daily basis retain those responsibilities during emergency response and disaster
recovery operations. (See Attachment 9 for general agency responsibilities.) To the
extent possible, the same personnel and material resources are employed. There
are some exceptions, however, since some emergency management functions, such
as managing donations, may not be performed by the state on a regular; in an
emergency these functions must be coordinated by the most appropriate ESF of the
SEMC and at the appropriate DDC.
d.
While ESFs of the SEMC are replicated to the fullest extent possible at the DDC
level, some state agencies do not have regional offices and therefore cannot operate
as ESF members except at the DDC. In these instances, the DDC Chairperson will
select the most appropriate ESF member agency to act as the "primary" agency for
that ESF.
e.
Requests for information relating to the emergency situation or requests for state
resource assistance will be assigned to the most appropriate ESF at the DDC or
SEMC for resolution. Most requests for assistance can be readily categorized and
assigned to an identifiable ESF for resolution. However, some specific support
requirements cannot not be easily categorized, such as emergency testing of
privately owned water wells, emergency construction of levees, or conducting
structural safety inspections in a disaster area. Such requests must be assigned to
the most appropriate ESF(s). If the assistance is not available from state
government, the ESF member agencies will use their working relationships with
industry, associations, and other groups to determine how best the request for
assistance might be satisfied.
f.
The response to requests for assistance or information addressed to the DDC or the
SEMC will be coordinated by the most appropriate ESF. The agencies composing
an ESF are expected to work together to satisfy emergency needs. They are
expected to ensure they have a clear understanding of the assistance required,
explore the full range of possible solutions, and recommend a preferred solution to
the SOC Controller or DDC Chair. These recommended actions could include: (1)
providing assistance through resources of an agency/organization in the ESF; (2)
providing assistance through resources of a public or private non-state organization
associated with an agency within the ESF; (3) providing assistance through a
mission tasking to the Military Support ESF; (4) determining that the needed
assistance is not available from any organization at the state government level and
should be passed to the federal government for resolution; or (5) providing
assistance through employment of intra or inter-state mutual aid resources. Based
on the recommendations provided, mission assignments will then be issued by the
appropriate direction and control authority and implemented by tasked
agencies/organizations.
g.
Annexes to this plan detail the organization, responsibilities, actions, and operational
procedures of each ESF. Functional responsibilities and tasks are multi-disciplined.
incidents. ESF responsibilities contained in the State Plan do not negate or alter these
existing these mandates or procedures. Lead agencies designated with specific incident
oversight responsibilities are as follows:
9.
a.
General Land Office - incidents involving state-owned lands, coastal oil spills, and
onshore/offshore petroleum storage facilities.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
Local Governments
a.
By Executive Order, the Governor has designated the mayor of each municipal
corporation and the county judge of each county as emergency management
directors for these political subdivisions. In that same Executive Order, the Governor
further authorized those elected officials to exercise the powers granted the
Governor by Chapter 418 of the Government Code an appropriate local scale during
disasters.
b.
Mayors and county judges are responsible for emergency management planning
within the jurisdiction and for providing guidance and direction for emergency
response and recovery operations should emergency situations threaten or occur.
Mayors and County Judges may appoint an emergency management coordinator
(EMC), who shall serve as an assistant to the chief elected official to manage the
emergency management program.
c.
d.
In the event that an emergency situation occurs, local officials are expected to:
1) Activate an incident command operation and, if needed, the local EOC and
other emergency facilities, and commit and direct appropriate local resources,
including mutual aid resources and organized volunteer groups such as CERTs,
to resolve the emergency situation.
Texas Homeland Security Strategic Plan - Part III - State of Texas Emergency Management Plan (Rev 5)
16
2) Take measures to protect public health and safety and public and private
property from damage or destruction.
f.
4)
5)
If local resources are insufficient to deal with the emergency situation, request
assistance from the State and facilitate delivery and employment of those
resources.
6)
State Assistance
1)
2)
During emergency operations, state and local emergency responders will remain, to
the extent possible, under the established management and supervisory control of
their parent organizations.
b.
Key officials have been vested, either by state law, executive order, or this plan, with
the responsibility for executing direction and control of multi-agency state response
and recovery operations in a defined area of responsibility within Texas.
c.
These key officials are identified and discussed in Section VI of this plan. They are
responsible for deciding response and/or recovery priorities of need. They have
been provided the authority to commit state resources necessary and reasonable to
satisfy those prioritized needs and likewise provided the authority to escalate the
assistance request to a higher response support level. These key officials have the
authority to issue mission assignments that involve the commitment of state
personnel and/or material resources, and the expenditures of state funds to resolve
emergency and/or disaster requirements.
Texas Homeland Security Strategic Plan - Part III - State of Texas Emergency Management Plan (Rev 5)
17
d.
This direction and control system provides a means for agencies/ organizations to
pursue existing mission requirements and for their emergency workers to continue to
operate under their existing supervisory chain of command. This system also
provides a means to focus the efforts and actions of multiple agencies/organizations
to resolve the most important problems facing the entire impacted area through the
prioritized commitment of efforts and deployment of resources.
b.
c.
b.
c.
d.
The Governor must be provided with accurate and timely risk and threat assessment
information prior to occurrence of a catastrophic event. If adequate warning time is
available, it is expected that the State Coordinator will request that the Governor
declare a State of Disaster based upon imminent threat. The commencement of
immediate response operations, however, is not dependent upon such a declaration.
Texas Homeland Security Strategic Plan - Part III - State of Texas Emergency Management Plan (Rev 5)
18
As a means to secure federal assistance and funds to reimburse the State and local
governments for authorized response and recovery-related expenditures, the
Governor will request federal assistance from the President through the FEMA
Region VI Director in accordance with the Stafford Act. The Governor may request a
Presidential Emergency Declaration prior to occurrence of the potentially
catastrophic event (i.e., massive wildfires) and a Presidential Major Disaster
Declaration soon after the actual occurrence of such an event.
e.
f.
The Federal Response Plan (FRP) and the associated Region VI Regional
Response Plan (RRP) provide for federal response and recovery assistance through
the coordinated actions of federal agencies. Federal agencies are also organized
ESFs consisting of a primary agency and support agencies tasked to address
functional-related needs, requirements, and capabilities. (See Attachment 7 for
federal ESF information.)
g.
When requested by a DDC Chair or directed by the State Coordinator, the SERT will
be activated and deploy into the disaster area. The SERT will provide immediate,
additional state presence in the disaster area, assess impact, identify immediate
lifesaving and hazard-abatement needs, and provide an on-scene capability for
enhanced emergency response operations.
h.
As soon as safe and practical, state response and recovery operations will begin
in the disaster area. The goal of these operations is to save lives, reduce human
suffering, and assist local governments. State and federal-level response and
recovery operations in the disaster area are based on demonstrated need. Initial
state and federal response assistance is expected to be limited immediately
following the occurrence of a catastrophic event because of frequent difficulty in
getting resources to the affected area. Affected local governments and state
agencies should be prepared to provide for their own needs until the full response
capability of state government, interstate mutual aid providers, and the federal
government is deployed and operational. This amount of time will be influenced by
the levels of preparedness achieved prior to occurrence of a catastrophic event.
i.
j.
The SOC will continue operations for as long as needed to facilitate emergency
response and initial recovery activities and until the DFO is staffed and operationally
capable of coordinating recovery efforts. Once the DFO is operational, and where
practical, the State Coordinator may transfer direction and control of certain state
Texas Homeland Security Strategic Plan - Part III - State of Texas Emergency Management Plan (Rev 5)
19
response operations from the SOC to the DFO. This action will not change the
role/responsibility of the DDC Chair(s), who will retain responsibility for operations
within the Disaster District(s).
k.
l.
Once conditions in the disaster area stabilize somewhat, recovery programs will
begin and response operations will be reduced accordingly. Both response and
recovery operations may be conducted concurrently for a limited time. Once
response operations are terminated, recovery operations will continue for as long as
required by conditions in the disaster area.
A wide range of technological hazards threaten the State. Emergency response and
disaster recovery operations for technological hazards parallel actions taken in
response to natural and man-made hazard events, but differ in regards to
procedures for accessing federal assistance.
b.
Texas Homeland Security Strategic Plan - Part III - State of Texas Emergency Management Plan (Rev 5)
20
c.
2.
The Governor has by executive order appointed the Director of the Governors Office of
Homeland Security as the Director of the Governor's Division of Emergency Management
(GDEM) and the Chair of the State Emergency Management Council (SEMC).
3.
The SEMC includes representatives of each state agency, board, or commission whose
functions or capabilities relate to important phases of emergency management. The
Governor also has appointed representatives of organized volunteer groups to the
Council. (See Attachment 1.)
4.
The SEMC has been authorized to issue such directives as may be necessary to
effectuate the purpose of the Texas Disaster Act (Chapter 418, Government Code).
5.
The SEMC has been organized into Emergency Support Functions composed of
personnel and resources of SEMC agencies and organization. Coordination for each
group is directed by a primary agency, which has been selected on the basis of its
authority or capability in that particular functional area. The other agencies and
organizations within the group are designated as support agencies and organizations
based on their ability to provide equipment, personnel, and expertise in support of
specific functional requirements. (See Attachment 2.)
a.
ESFs identified in this plan are similar to, but not exactly the same as, the
counterpart federal-level ESFs contained in the FRP and RRP. This is to facilitate
better coordination between the State and its local governments while enhancing
coordinated response and recovery operations jointly conducted by state and federal
agencies in Texas. A matrix that identifies counterpart state and federal primary
agencies for each federal ESF is provided in this plan. (See Attachment 7.)
b.
The ESF organization doesn't negate legislated mandates for lead agencies in
certain types of emergencies (i.e., oil spills, hazmat, radiological incidents). In those
cases, the lead agency, by law, will always be the lead state responder regardless of
its placement (either primary or support agency) in the ESF organization.
6.
A state Critical Infrastructure Protection Council (CIPS) has been established to advise
the Governor on development and coordination of the statewide critical infrastructure
protection strategy and implementation of that strategy.
7.
State Disaster Districts have been established to divide the State into a number of
manageable emergency response/operations areas. These districts parallel the Highway
Patrol districts and subdistricts of the Texas Department of Public Safety. (See
Attachment 2.)
8.
9.
DDC Chairs shall report to the Director of the Office of Homeland Security on matters
relating to disasters and emergencies and shall keep the Director of the Department of
Public Safety appraised on all matters as requested by the Director of that Department.
Texas Homeland Security Strategic Plan - Part III - State of Texas Emergency Management Plan (Rev 5)
21
10. Regional Liaison Officers (RLOs) of the Governor's Division of Emergency Management
are assigned to each of the Department of Public Safety districts and assist the DDC
Chairperson within their assigned areas.
11. Typical state-local emergency management organizational arrangements in the response
phase are depicted in Figure 1. The typical recovery phase organization is depicted in
Figure 2.
B. RESPONSIBILITIES
1.
Key Officials
a.
The Governor
1) The Governor has ultimate responsibility for meeting the dangers to the people
of Texas. The Governor may issue executive orders, proclamations, and
regulations and amend or rescind them. Such actions by the Governor have the
force and effect of law.
Texas Homeland Security Strategic Plan - Part III - State of Texas Emergency Management Plan (Rev 5)
22
Figure 1
State-Local Emergency Management Organization
(Response Phase)
Governor
FEMA
ROC
JOC
State Coordinator
STATE OPERATIONS CENTER
TIPCC & TSAAC
State Emergency Management Council
Incident Commander
INCIDENT COMMAND POST
Texas Homeland Security Strategic Plan - Part III - State of Texas Emergency Management Plan (Rev 5)
23
Figure 2
State-Local Emergency Management Organization
(Recovery Phase)
US
DHS
Governors
Office
FEMA
Region VI
GDEM
DISASTER
FIELD OFFICE
FCO
SCO
ERT
(Federal
staff)
State
staff
Mission Assignments
Mission Assignments
Joint
Info.
Center
Federal
Agencies
State
Agencies
Disaster Recovery
Centers
Texas Homeland Security Strategic Plan - Part III - State of Texas Emergency Management Plan (Rev 5)
24
g) control ingress and egress of a disaster area and the movement of persons
and the occupancy of premises in an area;
h) enter into purchase, lease, or other arrangements with an agency of the
United States for temporary housing units to be occupied by disaster
victims, and may make units available to any political subdivision; and
i)
b.
1) By executive order, the Governor has designated the Director of the Governors
Office of Homeland Security as the Director of the Governors Division of
Emergency Management (GDEM).
2) By executive order, The Director serves as the Chair of the state Emergency
Management Council.
3) The Director shall advise the Governor, Lieutenant Governor, and Speaker of
the House of Representatives on critical matters relating to homeland security
and man-made or natural disasters.
3) 16.055 of the Water Code provides that the State Coordinator shall serve as
the State Drought Manager and is responsible for managing and coordinating
the drought response component of the state water plan. The State Coordinator
chairs the Drought Preparedness Council.
d.
area. See Attachment 3 for a map of Disaster Districts. The DDC Chair, the
Highway Patrol captain or command lieutenant for that Highway Patrol district or
subdistrict, is responsible for monitoring and reporting on emergency situations.
The DDC Chair also receives and validates requests for state emergency
assistance from local governments, works with the DDC members to identify
resources which can satisfy the request, coordinates arrangements for getting
those resources to the place where they are needed, and monitors the use of
those resources.
2) The DDC Chairs may activate their EOCs to monitor emergency situations and
execute direction and control of state resources during emergency response
and recovery operations within disaster district boundaries.
2.
County judges and mayors are responsible for directing, controlling, and
coordinating emergency operations within their jurisdictions.
2)
Organizations
a.
2) The Director of the Governors Office of Homeland Security, who is also Director
of the Governors Division of Emergency Management, chairs the SEMC. The
Director or the State Coordinator may convene the full SEMC or portions of it
when emergency situations occur and request that SEMC members report to
the SOC.
3) General Responsibilities. All SEMC agencies and organization will ensure that
capabilities exist for their organizations to execute statewide emergency
management responsibilities. Each SEMC member will:
Texas Homeland Security Strategic Plan - Part III - State of Texas Emergency Management Plan (Rev 5)
26
a) Ensure that qualified personnel are available to staff and operate state and
joint direction and control and support facilities that may be activated during
emergency response and recovery operations. These facilities include the
SOC, Disaster District EOCs, a Joint Operations Center, on-scene
command posts, the Disaster Field Office, a Joint Information Center (JIC),
Disaster Recovery Centers (DRCs), and Resource Staging Areas (RSAs).
State agency representative to the SEMC and DDCs must be
knowledgeable of the type, quantity, and location of agency resources and
the capabilities and limitations of those resources; they should have in place
procedures to mobilize and deploy those resources in a timely manner to
accomplish emergency response and recovery tasks.
b) Designate an individual to serve as the first call for their agency and serve
the primary point-of-contact and notification point for emergency
management activities as well as at least two additional contact persons.
Designations should be in writing and sent to the State Coordinator and
include office address, office telephone number and fax number, pager
number, and a home telephone number (or the number of a cellular phone
which is available during non-duty hours) for each individual. The
designation shall include the priority of notification first call, second call,
and third call.
c) Ensure that designated points of contact notify the agency or organization
senior staff of emergency situation and arrange to notify employees who
may have to participate in emergency operations.
d) Ensure qualified personnel are available to conduct extended field
operations as a member of the SERT if the agency has been tasked to
participate in the SERT.
e) Develop and maintain detailed plans and operating procedures for
accomplishment of agency and functional responsibilities.
f)
b.
1) Warning ESF
a) Responsible For: Coordinating plans and emergency actions to use
available warning networks to disseminate warning of emergency situations
of state, local, and federal officials and to alert the public of emergency
situations and provide information and instructions. Maintains Annex A to
the State Plan.
b) Primary Council Agency: Department of Public Safety
c) Applicable Federal ESF#: none
d) Council Support Agency: Governor's Division of Emergency Management
2) Communications ESF
Texas Homeland Security Strategic Plan - Part III - State of Texas Emergency Management Plan (Rev 5)
27
5)
Evacuation ESF
a)
6) Firefighting ESF
a) Responsible For: Coordinating plans and emergency actions to detect and
suppress fires on state and private lands, coordinate firefighting operations
for large wildland fires encompassing several governmental jurisdictions,
and assist in large industrial/structural fires. Maintains Annex F to the State
Plan.
b) Primary Council Agency:
Texas Forest Service
c) Applicable Federal ESF#:
4
d) Council Support Agencies:
1. Adjutant Generals Department
2. Governors Division of Emergency Management
3. Texas Commission on Fire Protection
4. Department of Criminal Justice
5. Department of Insurance
6. Department of Public Safety
7. Department of Transportation
8. Texas Engineering Extension Service
e) Other Support Agencies: Civil Air Patrol
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Texas Homeland Security Strategic Plan - Part III - State of Texas Emergency Management Plan (Rev 5)
35
District. DDC Chairs activate DDCs and maintain a current call list for their DDC.
3.
Facilities
a.
1) The TIPCC is the states primary entity for planning, coordination, and
integration of government communications capabilities to implement the
Governors homeland security strategy and ensure an effective response to
homeland security emergencies.
Texas Homeland Security Strategic Plan - Part III - State of Texas Emergency Management Plan (Rev 5)
36
1)
The Texas Security Alert and Analysis Center (TSAAC), staffed by DPS Special
Crimes personnel, will analyze suspicious incidents relating to homeland
security reported by law enforcement agencies, share information developed by
the state with and respond to queries from local governments, other states, and
the US Department of Homeland Security through the Joint Regional
Intelligence Exploitation System (JRIES).
2)
Under the Texas Disaster Act of 1975, as amended, the Governor is granted broad
powers to deal with disasters. Under this Act, the Governor may issue executive
orders, proclamations, and regulations and amend or rescind them. Executive
orders, proclamations, and regulations have the force and effect of law.
b.
Additional authority to issue directives calculated to protect life and property, and to
control and terminate an emergency, is granted the Governor in instances when a
State of Emergency is proclaimed under provisions of Chapter 433 of the Texas
Government Code.
2. Under the auspices of the Governor, the State Emergency Management Director and
State Coordinator exercise overall direction and control of state emergency response and
recovery operations, usually from the State Operations Center (SOC) in Austin.
3.
a.
b.
The Assistant State Coordinator for Operations is responsible for managing the state
response. He will provide guidance to the SOC Controllers and special staff and is
the single point of contact for SOC Controllers to resolve any issue that the SOC
Controller cannot resolve. He will ensure that there is a continually coordinated
response to achieve the objectives set by the State Coordinator.
c.
The SOC coordinates with state agencies to identify, activate, and deploy state
resources to perform specific missions need to deal with emergency situation.
Once deployed, such resources are directed and controlled by the DDC Chair.
Disaster District Committee (DDC) Chairs exercise direction and control of State
response operations within the boundaries of a Disaster District.
a.
The DDC Chairperson issues mission assignments to state agencies and exercises
operational control of National Guard, State Guard, and mutual aid emergency
Texas Homeland Security Strategic Plan - Part III - State of Texas Emergency Management Plan (Rev 5)
37
4.
b.
Texas National Guard and State Guard personnel ordered to state active duty status
by the Governor will at all times remain under command and control of military
authorities in accordance with the military chain-of-command established by the
Adjutant General of Texas. Upon direction of the Governor, the Adjutant General will
designate a Task Force Commander to execute command and control of National
Guard personnel and their associated resources supporting emergency response
and recovery operations in a Disaster District or deployed out of the State under
provisions of EMAC. Within the State, the DDC Chairperson will provide mission
assignments to the designated National Guard Task Force Commander.
c.
1) Mayors and County Judges are expected to provide direction and control of city
and county emergency response operations, typically from the local EOC. Local
response forces normally establish an incident command post at the scene of
an emergency situation, which may operate for some time before state
resources are requested and deployed.
The local incident commander
normally carries out the Incident Command System (ICS) function of command
making operational decisions to manage the incident from that command
post.
2) Responding local mutual resources and state and federal resources will
normally be integrated into the ongoing incident command structure and accept
tactical direction from the incident commander.
5.
State Command Posts. State field command posts may be established for
emergency situations for which the state has primary responsibility, primarily those
involving state property. The lead state agency or DDC Chair shall designate a state
incident commander to provide direction and control of state personnel involved in
site-specific response activity. The State Incident Commander shall keep the DDC
Chair informed of the emergency situation and the progress of response operations.
State Area Command (SAC) A SAC may be established in the event that an emergency
or disaster area is widespread and encompasses more than one disaster district. A SAC
is an organization formed to manage multiple incidents that are each being handled by
Texas Homeland Security Strategic Plan - Part III - State of Texas Emergency Management Plan (Rev 5)
38
an incident management team, or very large incidents that have multiple incident
management teams. Among the types of emergencies for which a SAC may be
established are extensive wildfires or an ice storm that affects a large area.
a.
b.
The State Coordinator, in conjunction with the designated lead agency and affected
DDC Chairs, will determine the need to establish a SAC, and will develop and
distribute an Operational Control Plan that specifies the organization, direction and
control, resource allocation, and operational procedures for the incident.
2. The GAR, assisted by the SCOs, will exercise overall direction and control of State
response/recovery operations, to include management and administration of programs
authorized by the Stafford Act. The GAR will delegate mission assignment and federal
and mutual aid resource commitment authority as needed, to insure the uninterrupted
ability to conduct response and recovery operations throughout the State.
C. EFFECT OF A FEDERAL EMERGENCY OR DISASTER DECLARATION
1.
2.
When activated, the DFO is a joint federal operation, with federal agencies supervised by
the FCO and state staff supervised by the SCO. Once a DFO has been activated, state
response operations will gradually be shifted to that facility and the SOC will reduce its
operational level. Recovery operations will be conducted from the DFO until such time as
the State and FEMA agree that a dedicated facility for response coordination is no longer
required in the affected area.
1) Planning, training, drills and exercises, and other preparedness activities are
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
b.
conducted.
Emergency equipment and facilities are maintained.
Warning and communications systems are tested.
Current natural, technological, and homeland security threats are monitored.
Criminal intelligence is collected, analyzed, and, where appropriate, reported.
Local responders generally resolve emergency incidents that occur. Additional
assistance, if needed, is requested from adjacent jurisdictions or responder
organizations in accordance with established mutual aid agreements. Normal
operations of local government have not been affected.
Certain types of incidents reported to the SOC or the TSAAC by local
governments, state agencies, other organizations, industry, or the public may be
monitored until investigated or resolved.
Texas Homeland Security Strategic Plan - Part III - State of Texas Emergency Management Plan (Rev 5)
40
2)
3)
4)
5)
5)
6)
d.
The scope of the emergency situation has expanded beyond that which can be
handled by normal responder agencies, and additional emergency support
functions such as shelter and mass care and evacuation may have to be
implemented.
Staffing of emergency facilities is increased, and hours of operation are
expanded, and coordination is intensified.
Response units are deployed and employed.
Requests for emergency assistance may be initiated between various
governments, and mutual aid resources may be summoned.
Appropriate officials and agency representatives are briefed on the current
situation and anticipated impacts.
Emergency public information activities should be expanded.
There may be some impairment of normal state and local government
operations.
1) The scope of the emergency has expanded to the point that all appropriate
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
B.
emergency response and recovery assets within some jurisdictions have been
committed to the emergency situation or disaster.
The SOC and appropriate Disaster District EOCs are fully staffed by
representatives from appropriate/required agencies and organizations and
remains operational on a continuing basis for as long as needed.
Interagency coordination and situation reporting are increased to meet demands
for information on the current situation.
The State receives requests for emergency assistance from local governments
and coordinates resource assistance.
Intrastate mutual aid may be sought and federal aid may be requested.
State and local government operations in impact areas may be impaired by the
evacuation of personnel or damage to facilities and equipment
Texas Homeland Security Strategic Plan - Part III - State of Texas Emergency Management Plan (Rev 5)
41
Low = Green. This condition is declared when there is a low risk of terrorist attacks.
General preventive and protective measures should be developed and
implemented.
b.
Guarded = Blue. This condition is declared when there is a general risk of terrorist
attacks. General protective measures should be implemented.
c.
d.
High = Orange. This condition is declared when there is a high risk of terrorist
attack. Increased security should be implemented and precautions taken at planned
public events; access to key facilities and critical infrastructure may be restricted.
e.
Severe = Red. This condition reflects a severe risk of terrorist act. During this
condition, staffing for emergency response and equipment readiness should be
increased, and special response teams mobilized; the operation of transportation
systems may be curtailed, and some public and government facilities may be closed.
C. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN STATE EMERGENCY READINESS & RESPONSE LEVELS AND HSAS
1.
State Readiness & Response Level 4/Normal Conditions is generally appropriate for
HSAS threat condition Green/Low
2.
State Readiness & Response Level 3/Increased Readiness is generally appropriate for
HSAS threat conditions Blue/Guarded and Yellow/Elevated.
3.
State Readiness and Response level 2/Escalated Response is generally appropriate for
HSAS threat condition Orange/High.
4.
State Readiness & Response Level 1/Emergency Conditions is generally appropriate for
HSAS threat condition Red/Severe.
B. LINES OF SUCCESSION
1.
General
Article III, Section 62 of the State Constitution provides for the prompt and temporary
succession to the powers and duties of public offices, whether by election or
appointment. At any time the incumbents of those offices become unavailable for
carrying on the duties of such offices, the Legislature may appoint successors.
2.
Executive
The lines of succession to the Governor are specified in the State Constitution (Article IV,
Section 3a) and the Emergency Interim Executive Succession Act (Title 4, Chapter
401.021 - 401.023). The succession order includes the Lieutenant Governor, President
Pro-Tempore of the Senate, Speaker of the House of Representatives, the Attorney
General, and then the Chief Justice of each of the Courts of Appeals in the numerical
order of the Supreme Judicial Districts in which they serve.
3.
Legislative
The lines of succession for the State Legislature are detailed in the Emergency Interim
Legislative Succession Act (Title 3, Chapters 304.001 -304.011) and extend seven deep
for each Legislative position.
4.
Judiciary
There is no automatic succession for members of the Judiciary. Vacancies of state
judges or justices are temporarily filled by the Governor until the next general election
occurs. (Article V, Sections 2 and 28 of the State Constitution detail this process.)
5. State Agencies
Lines of succession for state agencies are detailed in the Emergency Interim Public
Office Succession Act (Title 110A, Article 6252-10a of the Government Code) and
require a minimum of three and a maximum of seven successors for key positions.
Council members are tasked to develop and maintain appropriate lines of succession for
key positions and procedures for the orderly succession of responsibilities.
6. Local Governments
Lines of succession for local governments are detailed in appropriate state and local
laws, regulations, and local government emergency management plans.
C. PRE-DELEGATION OF EMERGENCY AUTHORITIES
The Governor's Executive Order Relating to Emergency Management, and the Texas
Disaster Act of 1975, Government Code Chapter 418, outline legal authorities available to the
Governor during a major emergency or disaster situation affecting the State. The State
Constitution, Article III, Section 62, outlines when and how the Governor can relocate the
"seat of government" if required by a disaster situation. Council members are tasked to
identify emergency legal authorities and their limits affecting their agencies and under what
circumstances and by whom they may be exercised. This includes those actions that can be
Texas Homeland Security Strategic Plan - Part III - State of Texas Emergency Management Plan (Rev 5)
43
carried out by that agency during a declared emergency, which couldn't be accomplished on a
normal everyday basis (e.g., changing priorities, limiting/excluding the bidding process, etc.)
D. EMERGENCY ACTION STEPS
Procedures to be followed during emergencies and/or disasters affecting the State are found
in this plan or associated documents. Each Council agency member is tasked to develop
operating procedures that include actions to be accomplished during emergencies and/or
disaster situations to include emergency assignments, responsibilities, duty stations and
notification/alerting of staff members. Action Guides are included in each Annex of this plan
that identify actions to be taken by each agency and the circumstances that trigger these
actions.
E.
F.
2.
State agencies need to develop and maintain procedures for identifying and recalling key
personnel, deciding which mission functions must continue at what level of
performance/output, relocating existing work areas including computer operations to preselected alternate work areas and/or dispersal sites, establishing applicable security
protection measures both en route and at new locations, and clearly identifying those
responsible for accomplishment of these tasks. The Department of Information
Resources will provide assistance and guidance to state agencies concerning computer
operations, specifically security and protection of computer data records.
of essential records and identify those responsible for accomplishment of these tasks.
In most situations, requests for federal assistance will be made through the SOC to the
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Exceptions to this are detailed in
federal, hazard-specific contingency plans and procedures and in Annexes D, F, N, and
Q to this plan.
2.
The process for requesting and providing interstate mutual aid is addressed in Annexes
D, F, and N to this plan.
2.
3.
Upon determination of need, the State Director, the State Coordinator, or the GAR may
authorize and impose additional emergency recording and reporting requirements
applicable to local governments and state agencies.
It is the intent of the Legislature, and the policy of the State, that funds to meet disaster
emergencies always be available, and that the first recourse be to the funds regularly
appropriated to state and local agencies.
2.
3.
Under the provisions of EMAC, Texas is responsible for the reimbursement of expenses
incurred by responding states during the delivery of mutual aid or for the out-of-state
Texas Homeland Security Strategic Plan - Part III - State of Texas Emergency Management Plan (Rev 5)
45
E.
In accordance with established procedures, state agencies may seek financial assistance
for unreasonably great emergency operations costs from the Disaster Contingency
Fund pursuant to section 418.073 (b) of the Disaster Act.
CRITIQUES
1.
Primary and lead state agencies are responsible for conducting critiques following the
conclusion of a significant emergency event/incident or exercise.
2.
The critique conducted will entail both written and verbal input from all appropriate
participants, including field personnel.
3.
In consultation with appropriate support agencies, the state agency having primary
and/or lead responsibility shall develop a written critique report, which will be provided
to the State Coordinator.
The Governor's Division of Emergency Management has the overall responsibility for
emergency planning and coordination of state resources in the conduct of emergency
operations.
2.
Each member agency of the State Emergency Management Council is responsible for
the development and maintenance of appropriate planning documents that address
responsibilities assigned in this plan, to include standard operating procedures.
3.
B. MAINTENANCE
1.
2.
The State Coordinator will maintain and update this plan, as required. Council member
representatives may recommend changes and will provide information concerning
capability changes that impact their emergency management responsibilities.
3.
State Emergency Management Council agencies are responsible for participating in the
annual review of the plan. The State Coordinator will coordinate all review and revision
efforts, and ensure that the plan is updated as necessary, based on lessons learned
during actual occurrence events and exercises, and other changes in organization,
technology and/or capabilities.
Texas Homeland Security Strategic Plan - Part III - State of Texas Emergency Management Plan (Rev 5)
46
4.
Council members have the responsibility for maintaining annexes, appendices, standard
operating procedures, notification lists, and resource data to ensure prompt and effective
response to emergencies. Agency resource data must be accessible to agency
representatives at the SOC and at each affected Disaster District EOC to facilitate the
capability of agency to support its emergency management responsibilities. Council
member agencies are also required to conduct and/or participate in training activities
designed to enhance their ability to accomplish their responsibilities as assigned by this
plan.
5.
This plan shall be exercised at least annually in the form of a simulated emergency in
order to provide practical, controlled, operational experience to those who have SOC
responsibilities. This requirement is applicable to the SOC and each Disaster District
EOC.
6.
Attachments
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Texas Homeland Security Strategic Plan - Part III - State of Texas Emergency Management Plan (Rev 5)
47
Attachment 1
Indicates departments and agencies which are members of the State Emergency
Response Commission (SERC)
** Non-governmental organizations
Texas Homeland Security Strategic Plan - Part III - State of Texas Emergency Management Plan (Rev 5)
1-1
Attachment 1
Texas Homeland Security Strategic Plan - Part III - State of Texas Emergency Management Plan (Rev 5)
1-2
Attachment 2
Texas Homeland Security Strategic Plan - Part III - State of Texas Emergency Management Plan (Rev 5)
2-1
AGD
ARC
CPA
GDEM
DIR
DPS
GLO
TBPC
MHMR
OAG
ORCA
PUC
RRC
SAO
TAHC
TCFP
TDA
TDCJ
S
P
S
P
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
P
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
P
S
S
S
S
S
2-2
P
S
S
S
S
P
S
S
S
S
S
S
P
S
S
S
P
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
Texas Homeland Security Strategic Plan - Part III - State of Texas Emergency Management Plan (Rev 5)
O RESERVED/FUTURE USE
W - MILITARY SUPPORT
T - DONATIONS MGMT.
S - TRANSPORTATION
U - TERRORIST INCIDENT
RESPONSE
V - FOOD AND WATER
S
S
S
S
P
S
S
S
P S
S
S
S
P
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S S
P - HAZARD MITIGATION
J - RECOVERY
I PUBLIC INFORMATION
G - LAW ENFORCEMENT
F - FIRE FIGHTING
E - EVACUATION
D - RADIOLOGICAL EMER
B - COMMUNICATIONS
A - WARNING
Attachment 2
Part 1 of 2
TXED
TDH
DSHS
TDADS
DARS
DFPS
TDHCA
DHS
TDI
TEA
TEEX
TFS
TCEQ
TPWD
TRC
TSA
TWC
TXDOT
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
P
S S
P
P
S
S
S
P S
S S
S S S
S S
S
S S
2-3
S
P S
P S
S
S
S
S
S
S S
S
S
S
S
S
P
S
S
S
S
S
S S
S
S
S
S
S S
S
S
S
S
S S
S S P
S
S
S P
S S S
U - TERRORIST INCIDENT
RESPONSE
V - FOOD AND WATER
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S S
P
S
S
Texas Homeland Security Strategic Plan - Part III - State of Texas Emergency Management Plan (Rev 5)
O RESERVED/FUTURE USE
W - MILITARY SUPPORT
T - DONATIONS MGMT.
S
S
S - TRANSPORTATION
P - HAZARD MITIGATION
M - RESOURCE SUPPORT
J - RECOVERY
I PUBLIC INFORMATION
G - LAW ENFORCEMENT
F - FIRE FIGHTING
E - EVACUATION
D - RADIOLOGICAL EMER
B - COMMUNICATIONS
A - WARNING
Attachment 2
Part 2 of 2
Attachment 2
Texas Homeland Security Strategic Plan - Part III - State of Texas Emergency Management Plan (Rev 5)
2-4
Attachment 3
Texas Homeland Security Strategic Plan - Part III - State of Texas Emergency Management Plan (Rev 5)
3-1
Attachment 3
Texas Homeland Security Strategic Plan - Part III - State of Texas Emergency Management Plan (Rev 5)
3-2
Attachment 4
Sector
Lead Agency
Air Quality
Agriculture
Department of Agriculture
Criminal Intelligence
Electricity
Emergency Services
Food Safety
Department of Health
Government
Governors Office
Information Service
Military
Public Health
Department of Health
Telecommunications
Transportation
Department of Transportation
Water
Texas Homeland Security Strategic Plan - Part III - State of Texas Emergency Management Plan (Rev 5)
4-1
Attachment 4
Texas Homeland Security Strategic Plan - Part III - State of Texas Emergency Management Plan (Rev 5)
4-2
Attachment 5
Dallam
Hartley
Moore
Oldham
Potter
Roberts Hemphill
Hutchinson
Gray
Carson
5B
Wheeler
Deaf
Smith
Hall
Childress
Hardeman
Bailey
Lamb
Hale
Floyd
Motley Cottle
Foard
Wilbarger
Wichita
Clay
Yoakum Terry
5A
Lynn
CrosbyDickens
Garza
King
Knox
Archer
Baylor
Young
Kent Stonewall Haskell
Throckmorton
Montague
Sub
5A
Jack
Cooke
Wise
Grayson Fannin
Sub
1A
Denton
Collin
1A
Gaines
Andrews
Dawson Borden
4A
Loving Winkler
El
Paso
Hudspeth
Ward
Culberson
Scurry
4B
Upton
Hood Johnson
Erath Somervell
Pecos
Jeff
Davis
Terrell
Brewster
Titus M
or
Camp ris
Bowie
Wood Upshur
1B
Cass
Marion
Dallas
Kaufman Van
Harrison
Zandt
Gregg
Smith
Ellis
Henderson
Panola
Rusk
Navarro
Coleman
6A
Runnels
6C
6B
Presidio
Rains
kli
Sub
2B
Sub
4B
Reeves
Sub
4A
an
Hill
Comanche
Bosque
Cherokee
Anderson
Brown
Shelby
Freestone
Hamilton
Nacogdoches
McLennan
San
Augustine
Limestone
Mills
Tom
Reagan
Coryell
Houston
Concho
Green
Leon
Angelina
Sabine
Irion
Falls
McCulloch San
Lampasas
Trinity
Bell
Saba
Jasper
Robertson Madison
Newton
Schleicher Menard
Polk
Burnet
Milam
Tyler
Walker
Mason
Crockett
Williamson
Llano
Brazos
San
Grimes
Jacinto
Sutton
Burleson
Kimble
Hardin
Blanco
Montgomery
Travis
Lee
Gillespie
Washington
Orange
Liberty
Bastrop
Hays
Kerr
Waller
Edwards
Val
Kendall
Austin
Jefferson
Harris
Fayette
Real
Caldwell
Comal
Verde
Chambers
Bandera
Colorado
Guadalupe
Fort Bend
Gonzales
Bexar
Galveston
Lavaca
Medina
Kinney Uvalde
Wilson
Brazoria
Wharton
DeWitt
Jackson Matagorda
Karnes
Frio Atascosa
Zavala
Maverick
Victoria
Goliad
Calhoun
Dimmit La Salle
Bee Refugio
McMullen Live
Aransas
Oak
San
Patricio
Jim
Webb
Nueces
Duval Wells
Glasscock
Coke
Ector Midland
Sterling
Crane
Palo
Shackelford
Jones
Stephens Pinto
Fisher
Red
River
Fr
Hunt Hopkins
Rockwall
Parker Tarrant
Lamar
Delta
2C
2B
Sub
8A
Sub
2C
3B
2A
3A
Sub
8A
Zapata
Kleberg
Jim
Hogg
Starr
Brooks
8A
Kenedy
Willacy
Hidalgo
Cameron
Texas Homeland Security Strategic Plan - Part III - State of Texas Emergency Management Plan (Rev 5)
5-1
Attachment 5
Texas Homeland Security Strategic Plan - Part III - State of Texas Emergency Management Plan (Rev 5)
5-2
Attachment 6
US DHS/
FEMA
GOVERNOR
Other
States
TSAAC
DISASTER DISTRICT
CHAIR
Disaster District Committee
Regional
Response
Teams
Other
Local
Governments
Business
&
Industry
LOCAL
GOVERNMENTS
Volunteer
Groups
Texas Homeland Security Strategic Plan - Part III - State of Texas Emergency Management Plan (Rev 5)
6-1
Attachment 6
Texas Homeland Security Strategic Plan - Part III - State of Texas Emergency Management Plan (Rev 5)
6-2
Attachment 7
FEDERAL
ESF #
FUNCTION
PRIMARY
FEDERAL AGENCY
PRIMARY
STATE AGENCY
TRANSPORTATION
Department of
Transportation
Department of Criminal
Justice
COMMUNICATIONS
Department of Information
Resources
Department of
Transportation
FIREFIGHTING
Department of
Agriculture
Federal Emergency
Management Agency
Governor's Division of
Emergency Management
MASS CARE
RESOURCE SUPPORT
General Services
Administration
Department of Health
and Human Services
Department of Health
Federal Emergency
Management Agency
Texas Engineering
Extension Service
10
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Environmental
Protection Agency
Texas Commission on
Environmental Quality
11
FOOD
Department of
Agriculture
Department of Human
Services
12
ENERGY
Department of Energy
The FEDERAL RESPONSE PLAN assigns emergency support function (ESF) responsibilities to specific federal
agencies. This chart identifies federal primary agencies for each numbered federal ESF and their
counterpart state agency.
Texas Homeland Security Strategic Plan - Part III - State of Texas Emergency Management Plan (Rev 5)
7-1
Attachment 7
Texas Homeland Security Strategic Plan - Part III - State of Texas Emergency Management Plan (Rev 5)
7-2
Attachment 8
PRIMARY STATE
AGENCY
FEDERAL ESF #
Annex A
Warning
DPS
Annex B
Communications
DIR
Annex C
TSA
Annex D
TDH
Annex E
Evacuation
DPS
Annex F
Firefighting
TFS
Annex G
Law Enforcement
DPS
Annex H
TDH
Annex I
Public Information
GDEM
Annex J
Recovery
GDEM
Annex K
TxDOT
Annex L
PUC
12
Annex M
Resource Support
TBPC
Annex N
GDEM
Annex O
Annex P
Hazard Mitigation
GDEM
Annex Q
TCEQ
10
Annex R
TEEX
Annex S
Transportation
TDCJ
Annex T
Donations Management
GDEM
Annex U
DPS
Annex V
DHS
Annex W
Military Support
AGD
11
Texas Homeland Security Strategic Plan - Part III - State of Texas Emergency Management Plan (Rev 5)
8-1
Attachment 8
Texas Homeland Security Strategic Plan - Part III - State of Texas Emergency Management Plan (Rev 5)
8-2
Attachment 9
Texas Homeland Security Strategic Plan - Part III - State of Texas Emergency Management Plan (Rev 5)
9-1
Attachment 9
SUMMARY OF
AGENCY EMERGENCY RESPONSIBILITIES
AGENCY/ORGANIZATION:
MISSION:
The Texas National Guard (TNG), to include the Texas Army and Air National
Guard, will:
Under command of the Governor of Texas, provide trained and equipped
units to assist civil authorities in the protection of life and property and the
preservation of peace, order, and public safety in the State of Texas.
Support also involves assisting local authorities in civil and natural
emergencies as well as community service activities.
When ordered or called into active federal service by the President of the
United States, provide trained and equipped units for war or national
emergencies, or at such other times as national security may require,
provide augmentation of the United States Armed Forces. This includes
supporting Department of Defense airlift requirements worldwide as well as
24-hour alert air defense missions on the Texas Gulf Coast and along the
United States' southern border.
The Texas State Guard, as a state reserve force, will, when activated by the
Governor, provide trained and equipped individuals to supplement the Texas
National Guard and to replace the TNG when that force is called into federal
service.
ENABLING LEGISLATION:
Public Information
Direction and Control
Food and Water
Firefighting
Terrorist Incident Response
Communications
MEMBER OF CIPC
Texas Homeland Security Strategic Plan - Part III - State of Texas Emergency Management Plan (Rev 5)
9-2
Attachment 9
SUMMARY OF
AGENCY EMERGENCY RESPONSIBILITIES
AGENCY/ORGANIZATION:
MISSION:
ENABLING LEGISLATION:
(None)
Texas Homeland Security Strategic Plan - Part III - State of Texas Emergency Management Plan (Rev 5)
9-3
Attachment 9
SUMMARY OF
AGENCY EMERGENCY RESPONSIBILITIES
AGENCY/ORGANIZATION:
MISSION:
DIR provides the State of Texas with an innovative use of information resources to
support better service delivery, cost-effective use of resources, and increased
accountability. DIR also conducts information technology research for the State.
Specifically, DIR coordinates and directs the use of information resources
technologies by state agencies that provide the most cost-effective and useful
retrieval and exchange of information both within and among the various agencies
and branches of government to the people of Texas and their elected
representatives. DIR additionally operates a disaster recovery site to prevent loss
of information.
ENABLING LEGISLATION:
MEMBER OF CIPC
Texas Homeland Security Strategic Plan - Part III - State of Texas Emergency Management Plan (Rev 5)
9-4
Attachment 9
SUMMARY OF
AGENCY EMERGENCY RESPONSIBILITIES
AGENCY/ORGANIZATION:
MISSION:
GLO is responsible for the management of over 20 million acres of state land and
the mineral rights therein. This includes 13 million acres dedicated to the
Permanent School Fund and state-owned "submerged" lands from the mean high
tide line out to 10.3 miles into the Gulf of Mexico. The GLO also manages
programs which offer qualified Texas veterans low-interest loans to purchase land,
homes, and make home improvements; is responsible for inventorying and
evaluating more than 2 million acres of property owned by state agencies to ensure
highest and best use; and plays an active role in environmental and economic
issues to include cleaning-up spills in state coastal waters, operating a recycling
education and market development program, mobilizing thousands of volunteers to
clean Texas beaches twice a year, and running an alternative fuels program that
emphasizes the use of clean natural gas as a fleet vehicle fuel.
ENABLING LEGISLATION:
Communications
Public Information
Direction and Control
Hazard Mitigation
Hazardous Materials and Oil Spill Response
Transportation
MEMBER OF CIPC
Texas Homeland Security Strategic Plan - Part III - State of Texas Emergency Management Plan (Rev 5)
9-5
Attachment 9
SUMMARY OF
AGENCY EMERGENCY RESPONSIBILITIES
AGENCY/ORGANIZATION:
MISSION:
TBPC provides its state customers with a cost-effective central source for the
timely delivery of goods, services, and facilities. This includes centralized
purchasing for all state agencies and operating the state's business program;
centralized services to state agencies including travel, mail and messenger, vehicle
fleet management, alternative fuels, office machine repair, and the central store;
providing staff support to the Council on Competitive Government; operating the
state and federal surplus property programs; conducting inspections of construction
projects and providing minor construction services to state agencies; managing the
state's leasing program for rental of office space; overseeing asbestos abatement
in the Capitol Complex; providing custodial services and building and grounds
maintenance for state-owned buildings; operating the Capitol Complex recycling
program; and planning, designing, managing, and operating the statewide TEX-AN
communications network and the Capitol Complex Centralized Telephone System.
ENABLING LEGISLATION:
Communications
Recovery
Public Works and Engineering
Direction and Control
Transportation
Donations Management
Terrorist Incident Response
Texas Homeland Security Strategic Plan - Part III - State of Texas Emergency Management Plan (Rev 5)
9-6
Attachment 9
SUMMARY OF
AGENCY EMERGENCY RESPONSIBILITIES
AGENCY/ORGANIZATION:
MISSION:
ENABLING LEGISLATION:
Public Information
Recovery
Direction and Control
Hazard Mitigation
Donations Management
Warning
Communications
Radiological Emergency Management
Evacuation
Firefighting
Search and Rescue
Terrorist Incident Response
MEMBER OF CIPC
Texas Homeland Security Strategic Plan - Part III - State of Texas Emergency Management Plan (Rev 5)
9-7
Attachment 9
SUMMARY OF
AGENCY EMERGENCY RESPONSIBILITIES
AGENCY/ORGANIZATION:
MISSION:
The Texas Attorney General is charged to defend the laws and the Constitution of
the State of Texas, represent the State in litigation, and approve public bond
issues. The Attorney General also serves as legal counsel to over 300 boards and
agencies of the state government. The OAG additionally serves and protects the
rights of all citizens of Texas through many of its activities, including consumer and
environmental protection, criminal law enforcement, financial litigation, and health
and safety enforcements, to name only a few. The OAG further collects unpaid
debts owed to the State as well as interpreting and defending state laws. The OAG
represents the State in civil matters and in criminal cases in the federal appellate
courts and may assist local prosecutors at their invitation. Civil matters include
antitrust activities, sales, deceptive trade practices, and other tax collection; bond
approval; insurance, banking, and securities activities; labor, agriculture, and
housing activities; environmental protection and energy law; representation of the
State's agencies and officials; investigation of crime victim's requests for
assistance; administration of the state workers' compensation system; and
investigation of Medicaid fraud. The OAG also is responsible for enforcing child
support to assist the families of non-supporting parents by locating the parents,
establishing paternity and court-ordered support obligations, and by enforcing
collection of established obligations. The OAG additionally administers the Crime
Victims' Compensation Program as well as the Court-Appointed Volunteer
Advocate program, which provides volunteer guardian assistance to juveniles.
ENABLING LEGISLATION:
None
Law Enforcement
Public Information
Recovery
Direction and Control
MEMBER OF CIPC
Texas Homeland Security Strategic Plan - Part III - State of Texas Emergency Management Plan (Rev 5)
9-8
Attachment 9
SUMMARY OF
AGENCY EMERGENCY RESPONSIBILITIES
AGENCY/ORGANIZATION:
MISSION:
ORCA was created in 2001 during the 77th legislative session (House Bill 7) to
serve as a focal agency for the states health, economic development, and
community development programs targeting rural Texas communities.
The agencys goal is to assure a continuing focus on rural issues, monitor
governmental actions affecting rural Texas, research problems and recommend
solutions, and coordinate rural programs among state agencies.
The Office administers programs supporting rural health care, the federal
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) non-entitlement program, and
programs designed to improve the leadership capacity of rural community
leaders. The Office also coordinates and monitors the states effort to improve
the results and cost-effectiveness of programs affecting rural communities, as
well as provide an annual evaluation of the condition of rural Texas Communities.
House Bill 7 created ORCA by merging three existing programs administered by
the state: the Center for Rural Health Initiatives (CRHI), previously associated
with the Department of Health, the Texas Community Development Program
(TCDP) and Local Government Services (LGS), both from the Department of
Housing and Community Affairs.
ENABLING LEGISLATION:
None
Recovery
Direction and Control
Hazard Mitigation
Texas Homeland Security Strategic Plan - Part III - State of Texas Emergency Management Plan (Rev 5)
9-9
Attachment 9
SUMMARY OF
AGENCY EMERGENCY RESPONSIBILITIES
AGENCY/ORGANIZATION:
MISSION:
The mission of the PUC is to assure the availability of safe, reliable, high quality
services that meet the needs of all Texans at just and reasonable rates. To
accomplish this mission, the PUC shall regulate electric and telecommunications
utilities as required while facilitating competition, operation of the free market, and
customer choice.
ENABLING LEGISLATION:
Communications
Direction and Control
MEMBER OF CIPC
Texas Homeland Security Strategic Plan - Part III - State of Texas Emergency Management Plan (Rev 5)
9-10
Attachment 9
SUMMARY OF
AGENCY EMERGENCY RESPONSIBILITIES
AGENCY/ORGANIZATION:
MISSION:
The RRC has regulatory responsibility over oil and gas exploration, development,
and production operations; gas utilities; pipeline and rail safety; the liquefied
petroleum gas industry; and the surface mining of coal, uranium, and iron ore
gravel. In particular, the agency administers regulations to protect public health
and safety and the environment from activities associated with oil and gas
exploration, development and production operations, which include pipeline
transportation of crude oil and natural gas, underground storage of hydrocarbons,
and management of oil and gas waste. The RRC administers an industry-funded
program to plug abandoned wells and clean-up abandoned, contaminated surface
sites, and manages crude oil and natural gas conservation programs. The RRC
also ensures a continuous, safe supply of natural gas is available to Texas
consumers at a reasonable price; administers a federally funded program to ensure
the safe operation of natural gas and hazardous liquids pipeline systems; and
regulates propane, compressed natural gas, and liquefied natural gas to protect
public safety. The agency additionally inspects railroad operations and equipment,
hazardous materials handling on railroads, signal operation, and railroad tracks
within Texas. Another responsibility of the RRC is to regulate surface mining of
coal, uranium, and iron ore gravel as well as to administer a program for reclaiming
abandoned mine lands. Finally the Commission conducts research and educates
the public about propane and other environmentally beneficial fuels and develops
marketing, advertising, and information programs to increase public awareness
about the fuel.
ENABLING LEGISLATION:
None
Communications
Public Information
Energy and Utilities
Direction and Control
Hazard Mitigation
Hazardous Materials and Oil Spill Response
Transportation
MEMBER OF CIPC
Texas Homeland Security Strategic Plan - Part III - State of Texas Emergency Management Plan (Rev 5)
9-11
Attachment 9
SUMMARY OF
AGENCY EMERGENCY RESPONSIBILITIES
AGENCY/ORGANIZATION:
MISSION:
SAO is a legislative agency that functions as the independent auditor of the entities
comprising state government in Texas. The Office reviews state agencies,
universities, and programs for management and fiscal controls, effectiveness,
efficiency, performance measures, and legal compliance. The State Auditor serves
under the general guidance of, and is responsible to, the Legislative Audit
Committee, a permanent standing joint committee of the State Legislature. The
Office also provides other services, such as responding to legislative requests,
advising state agencies, designing and developing technical training for internal
auditors, and managing the state employee position classification system.
ENABLING LEGISLATION:
None
Texas Homeland Security Strategic Plan - Part III - State of Texas Emergency Management Plan (Rev 5)
9-12
Attachment 9
SUMMARY OF
AGENCY EMERGENCY RESPONSIBILITIES
AGENCY/ORGANIZATION:
MISSION:
The State Comptroller serves as the chief fiscal and revenue forecasting officer for
the State of Texas. The State Comptroller administers and enforces revenueproducing tax laws; collects, processes, and deposits state revenue collections in
the State Treasury; monitors and approves expenditures of appropriated state
funds; provides accounting services to state agencies; and estimates state revenue
for the purpose of certifying legislative appropriations. The State Comptroller also
administers certain state energy programs and the oil overcharge fund. The
primary functions of the Comptroller's Office are tax administration, funds
management, and central administration.
ENABLING LEGISLATION:
None
Recovery
Energy and Utilities
Direction and Control
Donations Management
Texas Homeland Security Strategic Plan - Part III - State of Texas Emergency Management Plan (Rev 5)
9-13
Attachment 9
SUMMARY OF
AGENCY EMERGENCY RESPONSIBILITIES
AGENCY/ORGANIZATION:
MISSION:
TCFP regulates and provides technical and financial assistance to paid fire
protection personnel and fire departments of municipalities, counties, specialpurpose districts, and other political subdivisions of the State. It adopts regulations
for certification of marine and aircraft crash and rescue fire protection personnel.
The Commission establishes minimum educational, training, physical, and mental
standards for fire protection personnel and may establish standards for advanced
or specialized fire-protection personnel.
The Commission inspects municipalities to assess the public firefighting services
and capabilities and reviews the key rate schedule of the Department of Insurance
and makes recommendations for revisions, which may affect fire insurance rates.
ENABLING LEGISLATION:
None
Firefighting
Public Information
Direction and Control
Hazardous Materials and Oil Spill Response
Texas Homeland Security Strategic Plan - Part III - State of Texas Emergency Management Plan (Rev 5)
9-14
Attachment 9
SUMMARY OF
AGENCY EMERGENCY RESPONSIBILITIES
AGENCY/ORGANIZATION:
MISSION:
To be published
ENABLING LEGISLATION:
To be published
Texas Homeland Security Strategic Plan - Part III - State of Texas Emergency Management Plan (Rev 5)
9-15
Attachment 9
SUMMARY OF
AGENCY EMERGENCY RESPONSIBILITIES
AGENCY/ORGANIZATION:
MISSION:
ENABLING LEGISLATION:
None
MEMBER OF CIPC
Texas Homeland Security Strategic Plan - Part III - State of Texas Emergency Management Plan (Rev 5)
9-16
Attachment 9
SUMMARY OF
AGENCY EMERGENCY RESPONSIBILITIES
AGENCY/ORGANIZATION:
MISSION:
To be published
ENABLING LEGISLATION:
To be published
None
Texas Homeland Security Strategic Plan - Part III - State of Texas Emergency Management Plan (Rev 5)
9-17
Attachment 9
SUMMARY OF
AGENCY EMERGENCY RESPONSIBILITIES
AGENCY/ORGANIZATION:
MISSION:
TXED is the primary economic development and tourism agency in the State. The
Department works in partnership with economic development organizations,
businesses, communities, government entities, and elected officials by creating
opportunities for growth among Texas companies and exhibits Texas' relative
economic strengths to companies planning to relocate. TXED also provides
business, economic analysis, and financial assistance to Texas communities and
to businesses seeking to expand or locate in Texas; promotes Texas as an ideal
international business location; and provides assistance to Texas companies
seeking to export goods or services. The Department additionally promotes the
State of Texas as a key travel destination through an extensive national and
international media campaign which includes providing information to the travel
industry to assist in selling Texas more aggressively and knowledgeably;
conducting familiarization tours for travel writers, tour operators, and travel
counselors; and participating in travel missions in key national and international
markets.
ENABLING LEGISLATION:
None
Public Information
Direction and Control
Texas Homeland Security Strategic Plan - Part III - State of Texas Emergency Management Plan (Rev 5)
9-18
Attachment 9
SUMMARY OF
AGENCY EMERGENCY RESPONSIBILITIES
AGENCY/ORGANIZATION:
MISSION:
ENABLING LEGISLATION:
Transportation
Communications
Firefighting
Law Enforcement
Health and Medical Services
Public Works and Engineering
Resource Support
Direction and Control
Search and Rescue
Food and Water
Texas Homeland Security Strategic Plan - Part III - State of Texas Emergency Management Plan (Rev 5)
9-19
Attachment 9
SUMMARY OF
AGENCY EMERGENCY RESPONSIBILITIES
AGENCY/ORGANIZATION:
MISSION:
The mission of DFPS is to protect the unprotected children, elderly, and people
with disabilities from abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
DFPS provides adult protective services for elderly people and those with
disabilities and child protective services for children in their own homes and in
foster care. The agency also licenses child care facilities, including day care
homes and centers and residential child-care facilities, and manages communitybased programs that prevent delinquency, abuse, neglect, and exploitation of
children, the elderly, and disabled.
ENABLING LEGISLATION:
To be published
None
Law Enforcement
Texas Homeland Security Strategic Plan - Part III - State of Texas Emergency Management Plan (Rev 5)
9-20
Attachment 9
SUMMARY OF
AGENCY EMERGENCY RESPONSIBILITIES
AGENCY/ORGANIZATION:
MISSION:
TDH serves as the state's primary agency for public health planning, services, and
regulation. Public health programs of TDH are grouped into six major areas of
responsibility: health care delivery, disease control and prevention, health care
financing, special health services, environmental and consumer health, and public
health regions. Services are provided both directly and by contract with local public
and private providers throughout the state.
TDH provides a wide-range of public health services, operates the state's Bureau
of Vital Statistics, and certifies and licenses emergency medical services (EMS)
personnel and organizations.
TDH also licenses the possession and use of radioactive materials in Texas, and
department field inspectors ensure that high safety standards are maintained.
ENABLING LEGISLATION:
Communications
Public Information
Direction and Control
Hazardous Materials and Oil Spill Response
Transportation
Donations Management
Food and Water
Terrorist Incident Response
MEMBER OF CIPC
Texas Homeland Security Strategic Plan - Part III - State of Texas Emergency Management Plan (Rev 5)
9-21
Attachment 9
SUMMARY OF
AGENCY EMERGENCY RESPONSIBILITIES
AGENCY/ORGANIZATION:
MISSION:
ENABLING LEGISLATION:
None
Recovery
Direction and Control
Hazard Mitigation
Texas Homeland Security Strategic Plan - Part III - State of Texas Emergency Management Plan (Rev 5)
9-22
Attachment 9
SUMMARY OF
AGENCY EMERGENCY RESPONSIBILITIES
AGENCY/ORGANIZATION:
MISSION:
TDHS provides quality services, which have a positive impact on the lives of
eligible Texans. Services include (1) financial assistance, medical benefits, food
stamps, special food and nutrition programs, and assistance to victims of natural
disasters; (2) case management, and support services to help Aid For Families
With Dependent Children (AFDC) recipients, food stamp recipients, and lowincome families become and stay self-sufficient; (3) community care for people who
are aged or disabled, including meals, attendant care, nursing care, physical
rehabilitation, emergency response, adult foster care, and residential care; and (4)
institutional care, when appropriate, for people who are aged or disabled, including
nursing facility care. DHS also exercises state responsibility for the state
Repatriation Program.
ENABLING LEGISLATION:
Texas Homeland Security Strategic Plan - Part III - State of Texas Emergency Management Plan (Rev 5)
9-23
Attachment 9
SUMMARY OF
AGENCY EMERGENCY RESPONSIBILITIES
AGENCY/ORGANIZATION:
MISSION:
TDI works for the availability of quality insurance products for all Texans at
reasonable prices and under reasonable terms and strives to protect the public
from the adverse consequences of insurer insolvency. TDI is also tasked to
enforce solvency standards and promote competition in the industry while
protecting the public from fraud, misrepresentation, and unfair practices. The TDI
is responsible to educate the public about insurance so that Texans can make
informed choices, and the Department will insist that the industry be responsible to
its customers. Specifically, TDI is responsible to ensure that insurance will be
available at the lowest possible cost to all consumers who need it; that consumers'
insurance assets are protected; that efforts to ensure prices are fair and
reasonable; and that claims are handled fairly, promptly, and professionally.
The Office of the State Fire Marshal investigates arson and suspected arson, and
administers and enforces applicable provisions of the Insurance Code and other
laws.
The State Fire Marshal also develops educational programs and
disseminates materials for public education in fire prevention and safety.
ENABLING LEGISLATION:
None
Firefighting
Public Information
Recovery
Direction and Control
Hazard Mitigation
Hazardous Materials and Oil Spill Response
Texas Homeland Security Strategic Plan - Part III - State of Texas Emergency Management Plan (Rev 5)
9-24
Attachment 9
SUMMARY OF
AGENCY EMERGENCY RESPONSIBILITIES
AGENCY/ORGANIZATION:
MISSION:
MHMR is the mental health authority in the State of Texas. The Department
operates and manages a series of residential and treatment facilities. In all, MHMR
provides services through its nine (9) State Hospitals, twelve (12) State Schools,
two (2) State Centers, and thirteen (13) State Operated Community Centers. The
Department also contracts with thirty-six (36) Community MHMR Centers.
The Department strives to respond to the diverse needs of all people with mental
illness and mental retardation by creating an accessible system of services that
supports individual choices and promotes lives of dignity and independence.
The Disaster Assistance Program is located within the Office of the Medical
Director. The mission of the program is to assist in reducing, alleviating and/or
preventing adverse emotional reactions to all citizens in the State of Texas who
may be exposed to serve traumatic events. In short, the major goal of the program
is to prevent citizens from entering the MHMR system, support those who do, and
assist in promoting dignity and independence of all. The program is also designed
to enhance all MHMR facilities and community centers in promoting and assisting
in mitigation, preparedness, planning, and recovery from facility-level emergencies.
The Disaster Assistance Program also provides, independently and as a member
of the State Crisis Consortium, Critical Incident Stress Management (CISM) and
Crisis Counseling. CISM and/or Crisis Counseling may be provided to emergency
responders, recovery personnel, and other groups as requested. MHMR may be
required or requested to provide state-level CISM event management and/or assist
in the coordination of a situation requiring a CISM response.
ENABLING LEGISLATION:
None
Texas Homeland Security Strategic Plan - Part III - State of Texas Emergency Management Plan (Rev 5)
9-25
Attachment 9
SUMMARY OF
AGENCY EMERGENCY RESPONSIBILITIES
AGENCY/ORGANIZATION:
MISSION:
DPS has responsibilities in three major areas: traffic law enforcement (TLE),
criminal law enforcement (CLE), and emergency management. TLE serves as the
State's police authority and is responsible for the supervision of traffic on Texas
roadways. It also administers the state driver and vehicle regulatory laws and
provides key assistance in the area of criminal law enforcement, furnishes security
officers for the Governor, and provides security and law enforcement for the State
Capitol, Capitol Complex, and various other state office buildings. CLE is
responsible for investigation of criminal activity in Texas and works closely with
local law enforcement agencies to investigate crime. This includes investigating
the illegal traffic of controlled substances and dangerous drugs; gathering and
analyzing information to suppress, investigate, and prosecute crime and corruption
in Texas; identifying stolen vehicles and apprehending individuals involved in auto
theft; administering polygraph examinations; and examining and analyzing physical
evidence (e.g., fingerprints, DNA, etc.). The Director of DPS is appointed as the
State Director of Emergency Management by the Governor and in this capacity
chairs the State Emergency Management Council and is responsible, through the
State Coordinator, for all activities of the Governor's Division of Emergency
Management (GDEM).
ENABLING LEGISLATION:
Warning
Evacuation
Law Enforcement
Terrorist Incident Response
Communications
Radiological Emergency Management
Firefighting
Public Information
Direction and Control
Hazardous Materials and Oil Spill Response
Search and Rescue
Transportation
MEMBER OF CIPC
Texas Homeland Security Strategic Plan - Part III - State of Texas Emergency Management Plan (Rev 5)
9-26
Attachment 9
SUMMARY OF
AGENCY EMERGENCY RESPONSIBILITIES
AGENCY/ORGANIZATION:
MISSION:
To be published
ENABLING LEGISLATION:
To be published
Communications
Public Information
Direction & Control
Hazardous Materials & Oil Spill Response
Transportation
Donations Management
Food & Water
Terrorist Incident Response
Texas Homeland Security Strategic Plan - Part III - State of Texas Emergency Management Plan (Rev 5)
9-27
Attachment 9
SUMMARY OF
AGENCY EMERGENCY RESPONSIBILITIES
AGENCY/ORGANIZATION:
MISSION:
TxDOT provides for the safe, effective, and efficient movement of people and
goods over state-maintained highways and farm-to-market/ranch roads, via public
transportation systems, and at airports throughout the State. TxDOT receives,
disburses, and administers federal and state funds for general aviation airports and
assists small communities in building, maintaining, and upgrading airports;
supervises the design, environmental oversight, acquisition of right-of-way,
materials testing and validation, construction, and maintenance of state highways;
issues oversize/overweight load permits and is responsible for commercial motor
carrier insurance filings and registration, vehicle storage facilities licensing, and
interstate movement authority; licenses new car dealers, distributors, converters,
and manufacturers doing business in Texas to include enforcement of the Lemon
Law; provides financial and technical assistance to urban, rural, and elderly or
disabled public transit providers; regulates outdoor advertising and junkyards;
oversees programs in traffic engineering, traffic safety, railroad crossing and
signals, and traffic management; supports tourism by operating travel information
centers and publishing travel literature; administers the statewide system for
collecting fees for motor vehicle registration and certificates of title; and advises on
international transportation in the region on both sides of the 2,000-mile U.S.Mexico border.
ENABLING LEGISLATION:
Communications
Evacuation
Firefighting
Public Information
Recovery
Direction and Control
Hazard Mitigation
Hazardous Materials and Oil Spill Response
Transportation
Terrorist Incident Response
MEMBER OF CIPC
Texas Homeland Security Strategic Plan - Part III - State of Texas Emergency Management Plan (Rev 5)
9-28
Attachment 9
SUMMARY OF
AGENCY EMERGENCY RESPONSIBILITIES
AGENCY/ORGANIZATION:
MISSION:
TEA performs specific statutory functions relating to public education for grades
pre-kindergarten through 12. The responsibility for public education in Texas is
divided between local school district authorities and the State with the majority of
responsibilities vested in 1000+ local school districts.
The primary state responsibility is allocating state funds to local school districts
through per capita aid and payments from the Foundation School Program. TEA
also handles federal funds related to public education.
TEA is organized to improve the effectiveness of school teachers and
administrators; to enhance educational programs for students; to provide funding to
local districts while ensuring proper use of state and federal funds; to conduct
educational research; to develop and administer student and teacher testing
programs; and to provide comprehensive information bases.
ENABLING LEGISLATION:
None
Texas Homeland Security Strategic Plan - Part III - State of Texas Emergency Management Plan (Rev 5)
9-29
Attachment 9
SUMMARY OF
AGENCY EMERGENCY RESPONSIBILITIES
AGENCY/ORGANIZATION:
MISSION:
ENABLING LEGISLATION:
Communications
Firefighting
Direction and Control
Hazard Mitigation
Hazardous Materials and Oil Spill Response
Transportation
Terrorist Incident Response
Texas Homeland Security Strategic Plan - Part III - State of Texas Emergency Management Plan (Rev 5)
9-30
Attachment 9
SUMMARY OF
AGENCY EMERGENCY RESPONSIBILITIES
AGENCY/ORGANIZATION:
MISSION:
TFS develops and implements a coordinated plan for effective forest fire protection
for over 20 million acres in 52 East Texas counties. The agency also provides
assistance and direction in the suppression of major wildland fires throughout the
State as needed. TFS additionally plans and conducts a cooperative fire protection
program with rural communities and neighborhood groups, providing development,
organizational, and material assistance. TFS provides support and assistance in
search and rescue, law enforcement, hazardous materials, evacuation,
reconnaissance, communications, and direction and control as needed.
ENABLING LEGISLATION:
Firefighting
Communications
Law Enforcement
Public Information
Recovery
Public Works and Engineering
Resource Support
Direction and Control
Hazard Mitigation
Search and Rescue
Terrorist Incident Response
Texas Homeland Security Strategic Plan - Part III - State of Texas Emergency Management Plan (Rev 5)
9-31
Attachment 9
SUMMARY OF
AGENCY EMERGENCY RESPONSIBILITIES
AGENCY/ORGANIZATION:
MISSION:
ENABLING LEGISLATION:
MEMBER OF CIPC
Texas Homeland Security Strategic Plan - Part III - State of Texas Emergency Management Plan (Rev 5)
9-32
Attachment 9
SUMMARY OF
AGENCY EMERGENCY RESPONSIBILITIES
AGENCY/ORGANIZATION:
MISSION:
ENABLING LEGISLATION:
None
Communications
Shelter and Mass Care
Radiological Emergency Management
Law Enforcement
Direction and Control
Hazard Mitigation
Hazardous Materials and Oil Spill Response
Search and Rescue
Transportation
Texas Homeland Security Strategic Plan - Part III - State of Texas Emergency Management Plan (Rev 5)
9-33
Attachment 9
SUMMARY OF
AGENCY EMERGENCY RESPONSIBILITIES
AGENCY/ORGANIZATION:
MISSION:
TRC is a "Human Energy Agency" that provides services to Texans with disabilities
who are attempting to be more independent, more productive, and more involved in
their communities.
TRC serves as the State's principal authority on the rehabilitation of persons with
disabilities, except those with visual impairments and those who are legally blind.
The Commission administers a variety of programs and manages transitional
planning and services for mentally retarded, mentally ill, and developmentally
disabled offenders, and provides administrative support services to the Texas
Planning Council for Developmental Disabilities.
TRC is actively involved in providing services for comprehensive medical
rehabilitation, disability determination, vocational rehabilitation, extended
rehabilitation, and support for independent living centers located across the State.
ENABLING LEGISLATION:
None
Texas Homeland Security Strategic Plan - Part III - State of Texas Emergency Management Plan (Rev 5)
9-34
Attachment 9
SUMMARY OF
AGENCY EMERGENCY RESPONSIBILITIES
AGENCY/ORGANIZATION:
MISSION:
TWC serves in a dual function as both an employment service and an agency for
the payment of unemployment benefits.
TWC's primary objectives are to promote the well-being of individuals in the State's
labor force, to participate in the development and full use of employment
resources, and to serve employers. TWC's specific responsibilities include the
operation of efficient employment and training programs that help individuals find
employment and furnish employers with qualified applicants and personnel
services, and the operation of an unemployment insurance program involving the
collection of unemployment insurance taxes with which to pay benefits to assist the
unemployed and cushion a community's economy against the detrimental effects of
unemployment. TWC also develops and analyzes labor market information and
related data to assess labor force characteristics and needs.
ENABLING LEGISLATION:
None
Recovery
Resource Support
Direction and Control
Donations Management
Texas Homeland Security Strategic Plan - Part III - State of Texas Emergency Management Plan (Rev 5)
9-35
Attachment 9
SUMMARY OF
AGENCY EMERGENCY RESPONSIBILITIES
AGENCY/ORGANIZATION:
MISSION:
The Salvation Army (TSA) is an evangelical part of the universal Christian Church
with a mission to preach the gospel of Jesus Christ and to meet human needs
without discrimination. TSA provides temporary shelter to those individuals in
financial straits; low-cost housing to those living on pensions or social security;
maternity homes for unwed mothers; emergency shelters, medical and counseling
services for women alcoholics and drug addicts; homes for predelinquent
adolescent girls; other children's homes; and day care centers. TSA provides
financial assistance to families as well as counseling regarding marriages,
child/parent relationships, and the problems of adolescents.
TSA works
cooperatively with the judicial, prison, and probation systems to include ministering
to inmates, pre-release job training, community-based rehabilitation centers,
halfway houses, and work-release programs. During major disasters, The
Salvation Army works cooperatively with federal, state, and local emergency
management agencies to meet various emergencies by providing food, clothing,
crisis counseling, and spiritual comfort to the disaster victims. The Salvation Army
also accepts cases to search for missing persons in all parts of the world.
ENABLING LEGISLATION:
Public Information
Recovery
Direction and Control
Food and Water
Terrorist Incident Response
Texas Homeland Security Strategic Plan - Part III - State of Texas Emergency Management Plan (Rev 5)
9-36
Attachment 9
SUMMARY OF
AGENCY EMERGENCY RESPONSIBILITIES
AGENCY/ORGANIZATION:
MISSION:
The mission of the TAHC is the prevention, surveillance, control, diagnosis, and
eradication of certain diseases and conditions affecting livestock, poultry, and exotic
animals, some of which have human health implications. These functions contribute
to the building of a solid foundation for economic prosperity while decreasing the
human health risks for the people of Texas.
The Commission is directed to protect livestock, domestic animals, and domestic
fowl from all diseases recognized as communicable by the veterinary profession;
may act to eradicate or control any disease or agent of transmission for any
disease that affects livestock, exotic livestock, domestic animals, domestic fowl,
exotic fowl, or canines, regardless of whether the disease is communicable; and
may adopt any rules necessary to carry out the purposes of this action, including
rules for testing, movement, inspection, and treatment.
TAHC consists of a central office in Austin and eight area offices strategically
located across the State. The Commission also works in cooperation, and is
partially funded by the U.S. Department of Agricultures Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service, Veterinary Services (USDA-APHIS-VS). Field veterinarians
and livestock inspectors are the first line of communication between TAHC and
producers. They test livestock on ranches and farms, inspect livestock markets to
ensure that diseased animals are shipped to proper destinations, and check
livestock shipments entering the State to make certain health certificates and
permits are valid. They determine when a disease or dangerous pest is present
and what animals may be exposed or at risk, communicate with producers to
develop epidemiological information, collect specimens, and interpret test results.
TAHC operates the Texas Emergency Response Team (TERT), which ensures
adequate planning, collaboration, and coordination among the States animal
health-related agencies, agriculture industries, and other related agencies and
parties including universities, other government officials, and private veterinarians
regarding emergency disease situations in livestock. The TERT may also assist in
responding to natural and human-caused emergencies and disasters.
ENABLING LEGISLATION:
None
Texas Homeland Security Strategic Plan - Part III - State of Texas Emergency Management Plan (Rev 5)
9-37
Links for Additional Information on Part III State Emergency Management Plan
The Division of Emergency Management web-site is a source of valuable information on
emergency response in Texas. The link to the downloadable documents page of the
DEM site contains documents and templates useful for state and local response in Texas.
Texas Division of Emergency Management Home Page
Downloadable Documents from the Texas Division of Emergency Management
The Texas State Emergency Plan includes annexes that provide detailed information.
Click on the annex to view it on the DEM website
A: Warning
B: Communications
C: Shelter and Mass Care
D: Radiological Emergency Management
E: Evacuation
F: Firefighting
o
G: Law Enforcement
H: Health and Medical Services
o
I: Public Information
J: Recovery
K: Public Works and Engineering
L: Energy and Utilities
M: Resource Support
N: Direction and Control
P: Hazard Mitigation
Q: HazMat & Oil Spill Response
R: Search and Rescue
S: Transportation
T: Donations Management
U: Terrorism Incident Response
V: Food and Water
W: Military Support
Texas Homeland Security Strategic Plan - Part III - State of Texas Emergency Management Plan
Links to Annexes