Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Foucault, Michel
Laura Cremonesi
The French philosopher Michel Foucault (192684) undertook a reflection on ethics
especially in the last part of his life, between the late 1970s and the early 1980s.
In fact, in his last two books, Foucault deals with ancient ethics (see ancient
ethics) and, in particular, with one of its fields of application, that of sexual conduct
(Foucault 1984a, 1984b).
In order to study Greek, Hellenistic, and Roman morality, he developed new
concepts, which enabled him to deal with ancient thought and practices in an
innovative way, but which may also provide helpful cues to the development of a
contemporary ethics. Foucaults interest in morality is closely related to all of his
philosophical and political research, which at first sight seems to have dealt with
issues that were not directly associated with ethics.
Generally speaking, Foucaults early analysis revolved around the issues of
knowledge and power. Through his studies Foucault developed a very original
conception of the relations between power and knowledge. Indeed he believed that,
in modern societies, knowledge is always intrinsically related to power.
However, Foucaults way of conceiving of this connection is very different from
that of classical political theory or from the conceptions we find in the Marxist
tradition, which was very influential in Foucaults philosophical environment. In
fact, according to Foucault, power doesnt act by limiting the free development of
knowledge or by censoring the freedom of expression. Nor does it act by concealing
the reality of the relations of production with the help of ideology, as classical
Marxism suggests.
Rather, in Foucaults view, relations of power produce some specific modalities of
knowledge. This entails that ways of knowing are defined by some relations of power,
which are nonetheless independent and external from the field of knowledge.
Therefore, in order to analyze the way in which historical modes of knowledge were
formed, we must take into account the social practices and the relations of power
that produced them.
As a consequence of this conception, Foucault developed an original
methodological approach to what he defines as apparatuses of powerknowledge.
In the 1960s Foucault calls his method an archaeology. This method aims to
investigate the ordered procedures that regulated the historical production of certain
systems of knowledge and assess the type of connection they have with specific and
political practices.
Later on, in the 1970s, Foucault partially modified his method and called it a
genealogy, which was a tribute to Friedrich Nietzsche (see nietzsche, friedrich).
Genealogy is more focused on historical aspects of the formation of systems of
The International Encyclopedia of Ethics. Edited by Hugh LaFollette, print pages 20082015.
2013 Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Published 2013 by Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
DOI: 10.1002/ 9781444367072.wbiee260
However, Foucault changed the initial plan and pushed his genealogy much
further back in time. He thought that the modern apparatus of sexuality had
inherited some of its traits from early Christianity. In fact, according to Foucault,
the role of confession a practice introduced by Christianity in the first centuries
was very important in relation to modern sexuality. Thus Foucault started to
study how early Christianity and early Christian ethics (see early christian
ethics) had changed the Greek and Roman experience of pleasures and sexual
desire.
This is the route through which Foucault was prompted to study how ancient
morality dealt with sexual behavior. His main purpose was to shed light on
differences between the ancient morality and experience and their Christian and
modern counterparts and to understand when and how the modern apparatus of
sexuality emerged.
To describe ancient ethics, and in particular the way it had dealt with sexual
behavior, Foucault produced some important methodological and conceptual
innovations in the field of the history of morality. He developed what could be called
a new conceptualization of ethics (Davidson 1994: 11618), which consists in
proposing a new set of concepts that enabled him to understand aspects of ancient
morality that had been scarcely visible until then. This new conceptualization of ethics is described by Foucault in the Introduction to the second volume of his History
of Sexuality (1984a: 329).
According to Foucault, the history of morality has been traditionally focused on
two spheres: it may study the history of the moral codes, that is, the values and rules
of action that are widespread in a given society; or it may deal with the morality of
behavior in order to find out to what extent real behaviors adhered to such codes
and rules in a given historical period. Although he thought both methods to be well
founded, Foucault focused on one further aspect, which he believed was neglected
in the way the history of morality is usually studied. Foucault set out to study the
way in which individuals are urged to constitute themselves as subjects of moral
conduct and the models proposed for setting up and developing relationships with
the self (1984a: 36).
Now, actions that comply with a moral rule may derive from the different ways in
which the individuals who perform them have constituted themselves as subjects of
such actions. Every moral action actually demands that the individual establishes
some relationship with the self and performs a work on himself, in the attempt to
constitute himself as a moral subject. Foucault clearly describes the way in which
such constitution of the self as a moral subject (or ethical subjectivation) may happen
(1984a: 335). It first demands the determination of the ethical substance, in which
the individual defines the part of himself on which he can perform the work of
moral subjectivation; then it requires a specific mode of subjection, which, for
Foucault, is the way in which an individual acknowledges the need to comply with a
rule of conduct; in addition, the individual must put in place the ethical work
proper, through which he transforms and elaborates his way of being through some
exercises and practices of the self. Finally, the ethical work must aim at a goal, which
Foucault calls the telos of the ethical subject and which is the mode of being the
individual aims at through his own moral conduct.
One of the examples proposed by Foucault may help understand the constitution
of the moral subject. The moral sexualconduct of conjugal fidelity may be connected,
for instance, to several modes of ethical subjectivation: in the ancient world, in
order to be faithful, an individual chose to act upon what the Greeks called ta
aphrodisia (sexual acts, pleasures, and desires) which, for Foucault, constituted
the ethical substance or the elements of the ethical domain by reducing
extramarital sexual activity; he obeyed to the value of fidelity in order to have a
beautiful, memorable life (mode of subjection); he practiced exercises to learn to
master the passions (ethical work) and to gain self-mastery (the telos end of
the ethical subject). In contrast, a Christian would choose desire as the ethical
substance to act upon; she would be faithful in observance of a divine law, she would
perform, as ethical work, the deciphering of the self and of her own desire, and she
would aim at becoming a pure subject, worthy of salvation.
Therefore, for Foucault, the history of morality must be focused on the ways
individuals have been led to elaborate a specific relationship with the self, one
through which they could conduct themselves morally. The part of morality that
studies forms of relationships with the self and modes of constitution of the subject
(or modes of subjectivation) is, according to Foucault, ethics proper.
Through his historical method, Foucault underlines that the modes of constitution
of the subject are historical and differ from one age to another. As we saw in the
earlier example, a great change occurred in the modes of relationships with the self
between Greek and HellenisticRoman antiquity and the Christianity of the first
centuries. According to Foucault and here he follows leading historians such as
Paul Veyne the Christian rules and codes of sexual behavior were very similar to
those of pagan antiquity. Both moral systems valued conjugal fidelity, for instance,
and they tended to restrict sexual acts to procreative ends. However, according to
Foucault, the two eras are separated by a rupture that does not concern either the
moral codes or the morality of behavior, but that revolves precisely around ethics
that is, around on modes of relationships with the self.
With Christianity, all four aspects of the constitution of the moral subject would
be deeply transformed. Through his new conceptualization of the history of morality,
Foucault is therefore able to shed light on some important historical differences and
discontinuities behind moralities that somehow can seem quite similar. This enables
him to understand certain specific traits of Greek morality and of Christian morality
that had not been explored at that time.
Foucault notices that Greco-Roman morality and Christian morality differ in the
importance they attach to the moral code and to ethics proper that is, to the
relationship with the self and to ethical work. Both moralities exhibit these two
aspects. Nevertheless, Christian morality (with some remarkable exceptions, such as
the one studied by Foucault, namely the experience of monasticism of the first
centuries ad) would have left little room for ethical work, for practices of the self,
and would have focused more on the elaboration of a code of conduct and of a
Foucault himself gave some short examples of the spheres to which such work on
the self might be applicable. For example, it may produce a new way of life, grounded
on friendship (see friendship), which in this approach may constitute a form of
resistance that tries to keep homosexual relations distinct from the apparatus of
sexuality (Foucault 1994a).
Starting from the genealogy of the ways in which ancient morality had dealt with
sexual behavior, Foucault developed a new conceptualization for the history of
ethics, which led him to find an important idea in ancient morality: that of a work of
ethical subjectivation that one can freely perform. Then he related this idea to that
of critique, maintaining that, in order to produce a critique of the present which is,
according to Foucault, the task of contemporary history and philosophy it was
necessary to perform an ethical work of the transformation ofthe self.
See also: ancient ethics; early christian ethics; friendship; kant,
immanuel; nietzsche, friedrich; perfectionism; virtue ethics
REFERENCES
Davidson, Arnold I. 1994. Ethics as Ascetics: Foucault, the History of Ethics and Ancient
Thought, in Gary Gutting (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Foucault. Cambridge,
MA: Cambridge University Press, pp. 115140.
Foucault, Michel 1972. Histoire de la folie lge classique. Paris: Gallimard.
Foucault, Michel 1975. Surveiller et punir: Naissance de la prison. Paris: Gallimard.
Foucault, Michel 1976. Histoire de la sexualit, vol. 1: La volont de savoir. Paris: Gallimard.
Foucault, Michel 1984a. Histoire de la sexualit, vol. 2: Lusage des plaisirs. Paris: Gallimard.
Foucault, Michel 1984b. Histoire de la sexualit, vol. 3: Le souci de soi. Paris: Gallimard.
Foucault, Michel 1994a. De lamiti comme mode de vie, in Dits et crits, vol. 4. Paris:
Gallimard, pp. 1638.
Foucault, Michel 1994b. What is Enlightenment? in Paul Rabinow (ed.), The Foucault
Reader. New York: Pantheon Books, pp. 3250.
Foucault, Michel 2001. LHermneutique du sujet: Cours au Collge de France (19811982).
Paris: Seuil-Gallimard.
Foucault, Michel 2008. Le Gouvernement de soi et des autres: Cours au Collge de France
(19821983). Paris: Seuil-Gallimard.
Foucault, Michel 2009. Le Courage de la vrit: Cours au Collge de France (19811982). Paris:
Seuil-Gallimard.
Hadot, Pierre 2002. Exercices spirituels et philosophie antique. Paris: Albin Michel.
Kant, Immanuel 1999. Beantwortung der Frage: Was ist Aufklrung? in Immanuel Kant,
Was ist Aufklrung? Ausgewhlte Kleine Schriften. Hamburg: Meiner, pp. 207.
Veyne, Paul 1986. Le dernier Foucault et sa morale, Critique, vol. 4712, pp. 93341.
FURTHER READINGS
Association pour le Centre Michel Foucault (ed.) 1988. Michel Foucault philosophe: Rencontre
internationale, Paris 9, 10, 11 Janvier 1988. Paris: Seuil.
8
Davidson, Arnold I. 1985. Archaeology, Genealogy, Ethics, in David C. Hoy (ed.), Foucault.
A Critical Reader. New York: Pantheon Books, pp. 2632.
Davidson, Arnold I. (ed.) 1997. Foucault and His Interlocutors. Chicago: University of
Chicago Press.
Djaballah, Marc 2008. Kant, Foucault, and Forms of Experience. New York: Routledge.
Dreyfus, Hubert L., and Paul Rabinow 1983. Michel Foucault. Beyond Structuralism and
Hermeneutics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Foucault, Michel 1988. Technologies of the Self. A Seminar with Michel Foucault. Amherst:
University of Massachussets Press.
Foucault, Michel 2001. Fearless Speech. Los Angeles: Semiotext(e).
Goldestein, Ian (ed.) 1994. Foucault and the Writing of History. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
McGushin, Edward 2007. Foucaults Askesis. An Introduction to Philosohical Life. Evanston,
IL: Northwestern University Press.