Professional Documents
Culture Documents
This types of buildings have solar passive strategies for heating in winter and
passive cooling strategies for summer. In direct gain applications, the most important factor
is provision of sufficient heat storage within the enclosing walls of the direct gain space
(Balcomb, et al, 86).
Alocation of thermal storage
For passive heating of building there are three types of thermal storage areas:
(Goulding 1994): 1- Primary thermal storage is that area located in a place that receives
solar radiation directly, the beam radiation from 9 A.M. to 3 P.M. solar time in winter.2Secondary thermal storage is thermal area that is outside the sunlit area but thermal
radiative coupling with it. 3- Remote thermal storage is not in radiative contact with
primary and secondary thermal storage. Heat transfer to remote storage is only by
convection.
Once the solar radiation enters the window some of it is absorbed on various
surfaces within the space, and the other energy is redistributed throughout the space both
by infrared radiation and by air convection. This redistribution of energy is so effective that
all surfaces enclosing a direct gain space are nearly equally effective for heat storage.
Primary and secondary thermal storage is named "direct thermal surface". Remote thermal
storage is named as "indirect thermal surface". ( Balcomb, 1984)
It is very important in solar building to put thermal mass as direct thermal surface. In
summer, heat transfer to and from thermal mass is by corrective compling only therefore
direct and indirect thermal surface does work by heat convection and radiation transfer.
Another issue to be considered in the walls' behaviour is that of the variation of the internal
temperature caused by energy accumulated during the daytime, which is radiated to the
outside at night.
If the project has the thermal mass in the interior of building, it have more thermal
inertia that transfer heat by convection and radiation to interior building in the night of
winter. In summer, mass transfer heat accumulated during the day to interior air and from it
to outside trought convective night cooling. It is very important to use a building
technology in witch the thermal isolation must be placed in the exterior (Itzard et al, 1998).
It thermal isolation is placed in the interior of wall, there is not possible to use mass
of wall as thermal mass and the building there is not have thermal inertia.
Material and thickness
Heat is generally accumulated in the materials with considerable thermal capacity.
The means of accumulation require high thermal conductivity, in order to allow a quick
transfer of heat from inside to outside the material. High density is a good indicator of a
material's high conductivity.
In an actual building, a wall will reach a particular temperature that will generally
be near a given mean value. Assuming this mean value as neutral from the standpoint of
energy consumption, when the temperature is higher, there is excess energy. When the
temperature is lower, energy is lacking. This cycle is conditioned by the wall's "U value."
Further, thermal capacity and diffusivity cause a time lag between uptake of and demand
for power.
The specific heat storage capacity of a material is the necessary heat to be added to a
unit of material mass to raise its temperature by 1K. The heat storage capacity of ordinary
building materials and water (between freezing point and boiling point) is practically
independent of temperature. Phase change materials (PCM) absorb heat when melting and
release heat when re-solidifying. But the interest of this paper is thermal materials that
storage sensible heat.
Thermal storage capacity, if of ordinary building materials is mainly dependent on
the density of the material (Table 1). The thickness of walls and floor are sick the mass
available for storage is generally less than the total mass. The effective thickness of
ordinary building materials are from 80 mm to 160 mm in period of charge and discharge
of 24 hours when the heat is supplying on only one side (goulding, et al, 1994). Roaf, 2003
indicates that (effective) thickness may be reduced to 100 mm without incurring significant
performance penalties.
Water has a very large storage capacity per unit of volume and may be used in thick
storage layers, as a result of circulating flows, a practically isothermal storage exists.
Phase Change Materials (PCM) have advantages with respect to other materials
specially if the storage temperature is above melting point. Benard et al, 1995 have shown
that the advantage of the paraffin walls over the concrete wall is that for a total weight
(inclouding containers) of about one-twelfth of the concrete wall weight, they allow for an
average useful efficiency, average comfort conditions and an average daily storafe similar
to those of the concrete wall. This is an enormous advantage for reciclyng buildings.
Tabla 1: Thermal properties of materials used in walls (Gelardi et al, 2000)
Thickness
Density
Thermal
Conductivity
Specific heat
Heat
CapacityStorage
[mm]
[Kg/m3]
[W/mK]
[J/KgK]
[KJ/m3K]
Concrete
120
2400
2,1
864
248
Brick
120
1800
0,6
1000
216
Water
120
1000
0,58
4186
502
Adobe
120
1700
0,52
1000
204
Materiales
There are several guidelines for the level of thermal mass to incorporate in buildings
(Balcomb et al, 1984, Goulding et al, 1994). These levels are chosen to prevent excessive
temperature swings in the occupied space. There are not, however, established studies that
definitively establish the effect of mass on building energy comsumption and the economy
of resources is one of the principles of sustainability in buildings (Kim et al, 1998).
There are two limits on building energy consumption which are derived analytically
(Mitchell et al., 1989). Thermal mass depends of: thermal characteristic of envelope
(overall conductance-area product of building), climatic conditions (ambient temperature
and solar radiation) and internal gains. It is necessary to take its into account to calculate
internal thermal mass.
For zero storage capacity, the heating requeirements are maximum. Thermal storage
allows excess daytime energy gains to be utilized that night and reduces purchased heating
requirements. There are a quantity of storage in function of solar savings fraction of the
building (Balcomb, 1986). But in summer, thermal storage transfer energy only by
convection and thermal admittance of the walls are useful to know the storage capacity of
wall in convective transfer (Balcomb, 1981).
We are calculated the cooling requirements of a building (in the diurnal time)
(Quadri, 1993) in the next study case. If the building does not have thermal storage it is
necessary an cooling equipment to refresh interior building. The energy consumed by
cooling equipment is the maximum energy comsumed by the building and the cost of
cooling is the highest. If the building have sufficient thermal storage, will accumulate all of
diurnal heat gain and maintain interior temperature below comfort level and the cost of
cooling is the lowest.
Case Study in Mendoza, Argentina
This concepts are studied for a building with an principal orientation to the equator
(12 m lenght). East orientation is 8 m lenght. The walls are built with interior massonry and
exterior thermal isolation of expanded polistyrene (U=0.68 W/m.C). The roof are thermal
isolated too (U=0.64 W/m.C). Windows are protected with overhang and have double
glass (U=3.1 W/m.C).
In this conditions, differents collected area of Direct Gain as Passive solar systems
of heating take into account without and with differents quantities of thermal mass in order
to know technical and economic efficiency.
Table 2: show economic efficiency of different grade of thermal mass
LCR
TS/CA
% SAVING
TS/CA
% SAVING
TS/CA
% SAVING
U$
EURO
100
30
215,9
75,3
57,3
47
36
31
97,3
226,6
89,9
60,2
22
10
85
30
100
260
88
66
11
69,3
95,8
8,3
86
100
290,3 102,1
319
112,9
77,1
84,9
Table 2 indicates different levels of Load Collector Ratio, three levels of interior
thermal mass 3 or 5, 9 or 10 and 30 or 31 TS, Thermal Mass (m) / CA, Collector Area
(m). The results are % saving in cooling requeriments in each case and the cost of 0%
savings in argentine peso, US dollars and Euros. It indicate that:
1- Minimum LCR (8.3) corresponding to the case of 100% equator facade as Direct Gain.
2- For LCR minimum saving is maximum and viceversa. In this case, with TS/CA = 5, the
savings id 86%.
3- TS/CA = 5 is equivalent to envelope surface of building of this case.
4- For LCR=22, correponding CA=0.1 FA (Floor area) = 34% of equator facade. In this
case with TS/CA = 5, savings are 0%, posibly is very small the surface of collector area.
With TS/CA = 9, savings are 85%.
5- For larger LCR, TS does not have incidence in savings of energy.
6- The result indicates that LCR=11 with CA = 0.2 FA =66.7% of equator facade is
recomended. The level of thermal mass must be TS/CA = 5 to obtain 69.3% of savings and
TS/CA = 9 to obtain 95.8% of annual savings in cooling.
It is important to indicate that TS/Ca = 5, when FAEP = 2 (Esteves et al, 1997) the
thermal mass surface is equivalent to envelope surface of building, and when TS/Ca = 9
this is equivalent to envelope surface and interior partitions surface added.
It is demonstrate that thermal mass is very important in desert and semidesert
climates and represent a very high level of savings depending on the conservation level and
collector area (LCR) of the building.
References
Balcomb Douglas, 1978, "Heat Storage Effectiveness of Concrete Masonry Units". Los
Alamos Scientific Laboratory. Internal Report LA-UR 82-966. N.M.
Balcomb Douglas et al, 1984. Solar Passive Design Handbook III.
Benard C., Body Y., Zanoli A. 1985. "Experimental Comparation of Latent and Sensible
Heat Thermal Walls". Solar Energy vol. 34, N 6, pp. 475-487. Pergamon.
Esteves A., Gelardi D., Oliva A. 1997. "The Shape In The Bioclimatic Architecture. The
Faep Factor". Proc. II Conf.Teachers of Architecture. Cap. 3-12. Ed. M. Sala. Italia.
Goulding et al, 1994. Energy in Architecture". The Energy Research Group. School of
Architecture. University of Dublin, IRL.
Izard, J.L.;Guyer,A. 1978 Arquitectura Bioclimatica. Editorial Gilli Barcelona. Espaa.
Kim Jong-Jin ; Rigdon B. 1998. Introduction of Sustainable Design. University of
Michigan. National Pollution Prevention Center for Higher Education.
Mitchell J.W.; Beckman W.A. 1989. Theoretical Limits for Storage of Eergy in
Buildings. Solar Energy Vol. 42, N 2, pp. 113-120.
Roaf Susan, Fuentes Manuel, Thomas Stephanie. 2003. Ecohouse 2 - A Design
Guide.Architectural Press, Amsterdam. ISBN 0 7506 5734 0.
Gelardi, D.; Esteves, A.; Piliafito, E.; Quero, J.; Inzirillo, R. 2000. Bioclimatic Building
with water wall solar system with botter of polythylene Terephthalate (pet.). 3rd
International Conferent for Teachers of Architectura, Oxford.