Professional Documents
Culture Documents
MAYA EIBSCHITZ-TSIMHONI,
Plaintiff,
v
OMER TSIMHONI,
Defendant.
/
TRANSCRIBED BY:
-1-
APPEARANCES, Continued:
Guardian ad litem:
-2-
TABLE OF CONTENTS
WITNESSES:
PLAINTIFF
PAGE
None
WITNESSES:
DEFENDANT
None
EXHIBITS:
INTRODUCED
None
-3-
ADMITTED
Pontiac, Michigan
THE CLERK:
4
5
Tsimhoni, 09-766749-DM.
MS. MIDDLEDITCH:
8
9
10
11
MR. BOSSORY:
12
13
14
MS. MIDDLEDITCH:
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
-4-
meaningfully engage.
discuss that with the court, but I want to make the court
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Forward.
15
16
17
18
19
There
20
21
22
23
24
tomorrow.
25
kids come here to your jury room and that my client would
-5-
have parenting time with Rowie (ph) from 9:00 a.m. to 11:00
a.m. and then lunch with Natalie and Rowie from 11:00 to
with Natalie.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
have to be filed.
20
21
programs.
22
intellectual capacity.
23
24
best interests.
25
If an agreement
MR. BOSSORY:
-6-
Thank you.
Just a couple of
points.
was written.
Just a
As far as the
10
that request.
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
her control.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
If the Families
Shes
If it doesnt go
-7-
months in advance.
routinely rescheduled.
10
11
12
MR. LANSAT:
13
14
15
just down the road pick another date for a few hours at the
16
jury room to make up for the time that would have been
17
18
19
20
21
22
fair compromise.
23
MS. MIDDLEDITCH:
May I respond?
24
25
have an issue.
And maybe we
At least
My client
-8-
That
And at the end of the day, you know, the -- the particular
schedule that we had laid out gives him some nice time with
then Natalie.
see their father for more than two weeks because they have
Its absurd.
THE COURT:
Its
10
11
MR. BOSSORY:
12
13
14
15
appropriate.
16
THE COURT:
17
18
19
parenting time.
20
21
22
23
24
25
MR. BOSSORY:
-9-
THE COURT:
cause.
MR. BOSSORY:
Something
This is -- Ive
And, this is
I
10
clarification.
11
12
13
14
15
phone.
16
17
there.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Shes
-10-
THE COURT:
Well, I --
MR. BOSSORY:
THE COURT:
to the tree.
bread basket to them and your children treated you the way
10
11
12
13
14
mind boggling.
15
16
17
18
case.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
-11-
lawyer because I locked her up, they all say shes like a
new school and she has zero contact with her mother.
will not let that mother have any contact with her because
that mother destroyed that girl and was leading her down
MS. MIDDLEDITCH:
And I
10
My client
11
12
13
Hes actually brought his son, Ben, to meet with the kids.
14
15
16
17
Ben and then with the kids themselves, certainly not with
18
my client.
19
THE COURT:
Mr. Gallagher?
20
MR. GALLAGHER:
21
22
been.
23
conversation.
24
The two times recently that Mr. Tsimhoni brought his son,
25
Ben, the kids would look at him, which prior to that they
-12-
hadnt.
4
5
THE COURT:
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Thats ridiculous.
No
19
20
Good job.
21
Hes got to go
22
23
24
25
to the home, given the nonsense that went on with Rowie the
-13-
Hes two
control over her kids and this is exactly what she desired
10
And, quite
I believe
I dont believe
11
12
13
14
15
16
incarceration.
17
MR. BOSSORY:
And
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
did.
25
And it
-14-
7
8
So
THE COURT:
10
despicable adult.
11
12
messed up.
13
14
15
16
17
her agreeing.
18
19
20
MS. MIDDLEDITCH:
21
MR. BOSSORY:
22
23
MS. MIDDLEDITCH:
24
25
You almost
Thank you.
(inaudible).
THE CLERK:
-15-
-- (inaudible)?
THE COURT:
MR. BOSSORY:
MS. MIDDLEDITCH:
MR. BOSSORY:
MS. MIDDLEDITCH:
it to him.
THE COURT:
10
11
As to form.
MR. BOSSORY:
form on there?
12
THE COURT:
13
THE CLERK:
(Inaudible).
14
15
-16-
CERTIFICATION
This is to certify that the attached electronically
recorded proceeding, consisting of seventeen (17) pages, before
the 6th Judicial Circuit Court, Oakland County in the matter of:
MAYA EIBSCHITZ-TSIMHONI
v
OMER TSIMHONI
/
Location: Circuit Court
Date: Tuesday, June 23, 2015
was held as herein appeared and that this is testimony from the
original transcript of the electronic recording thereof, to the
best of my ability.
I further state that I assume no responsibility for any
events that occurred during the above proceedings or any
inaudible responses by any party or parties that are not
discernible on the electronic recording of the proceedings.
\s\
Sally Fritz