Professional Documents
Culture Documents
5
Case 1:07-cv-00620-RMC Document 5 Filed 06/14/2007 Page 1 of 4
Plaintiff Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (“CREW”) filed this action
under the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), 5 U.S.C. § 552, to challenge defendant Central
between the White House and CIA regarding Valerie Plame Wilson and/or Joseph Wilson from
July 6, 2003 to the present.” Compl. ¶ 1. As such, this action is ordinarily exempt from the
requirements of Rule 26(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See L. Civ. R. 16.3(b)
(exempting “FOIA actions” from requirements of Local Rule 16.3 and Rules 16(b) and 26(f) of
the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure). By Order of May 14, 2007, however, this Court ordered
the parties to meet and confer. Pursuant to that order, counsel for the parties conferred by
telephone on May 31, 2007 and now submit the following joint report:
1. Defendant intends to move for an Open America stay based on its claim that
exceptional circumstances require that the CIA have additional time to process plaintiff’s FOIA
request.
Dockets.Justia.com
Case 1:07-cv-00620-RMC Document 5 Filed 06/14/2007 Page 2 of 4
2. During the meet and confer on May 31, 2007, counsel discussed whether the parties
could agree to the stay or alternatively agree to a briefing schedule for defendant’s motion.
Plaintiff’s counsel indicated that plaintiff intends to oppose defendant’s motion for a stay.
3. The parties were unable to agree on a briefing schedule and therefore respectfully
request that the Court enter a scheduling order for defendant’s stay motion.
PLAINTIFF’S POSITION
1. Plaintiff notes that in its Answer, defendant did not mention or otherwise refer to the
need for a stay of this action. Plaintiff believes that given the discrete topic of its FOIA request –
“communications between the White House and the CIA regarding Valerie Plame Wilson and/or
Joseph Wilson” – that a stay would be inappropriate and would simply delay the processing of
motion:
DEFENDANT’S POSITION
1. By letter dated February 27, 2007, CIA informed plaintiff that the agency processes
FOIA requests on a “first-in, first-out basis” and only makes exceptions to that rule “when a
requester establishes a compelling need under the standards in our regulations.” Compl. Ex. B;
see also 32 C.F.R. § 1900.34 (“Requests for expedited processing”). Plaintiff has not established
such a compelling need, and therefore its February 15, 2007 FOIA request is being processed in
2
Case 1:07-cv-00620-RMC Document 5 Filed 06/14/2007 Page 3 of 4
the order received. See Compl. ¶ 18 (“CREW never requested that the CIA expedite the
2. Defendant proposes the following briefing schedule for its contemplated motion:
3
Case 1:07-cv-00620-RMC Document 5 Filed 06/14/2007 Page 4 of 4
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that on June 14, 2007, a true and correct copy of the foregoing Joint
Status Report was electronically filed through the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
Electronic Document Filing System (ECF) and that the document is available for viewing on that
system.