Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Algal Research
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/algal
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 31 March 2015
Received in revised form 12 June 2015
Accepted 11 July 2015
Available online xxxx
Keywords:
Chemical modulators
Astaxanthin
H. pluvialis
Metabolomics
a b s t r a c t
Haematococcus pluvialis is one natural source for high-value anti-oxidant astaxanthin. In this study, we evaluated
23 chemicals of 8 groups (antioxidant, oxidant, signal transducer, metal ion, auxin, gibberellin, cytokinin and
amine) for their effects on astaxanthin accumulation in H. pluvialis. The results showed that oxidant and signal
transduction chemicals increased astaxanthin accumulation in H. pluvialis signicantly by more than 20%. To reveal possible regulatory mechanism, a gas chromatographymass spectrometry (GCMS) and a liquid chromatographymass spectrometry (LCMS) based metabolomic analysis were applied to determine metabolic
proles of H. pluvialis treated with chemical modulators, and then the metabolomic data was analyzed by a partial least squares-discriminate analysis (PLS-DA) and a weighted correlation network analysis (WGCNA) to identify possible metabolic modules and metabolites relevant to the increased astaxanthin accumulation. The
analyses showed six metabolic modules and seven hub metabolites were possibly related to the stimulatory
roles of oxidant or signal transduction in H. pluvialis. The study provided new insights to the regulatory mechanism of oxidant and signal transduction chemicals on astaxanthin accumulation in H. pluvialis.
2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
The carotenoid astaxanthin (3,3-dihydroxy-,-carotene-4,4dione) has been found in microalgae, aquatic animals, birds and yeast
and is a high-value pigment widely applied in an abroad range of
areas, such as aquaculture and the nutraceutical, pharmaceutical, and
cosmetic industries due to its high anti-oxidative activity [1,2].
Haematococcus pluvialis can accumulate up to 56% (w/w) of
astaxanthin on dry weight basis as a self-defense mechanism under various stresses, thus has become an important natural resource of
astaxanthin [3,4]. Signicant researches have been conducted in
H. pluvialis to enhance microalgal biomass production [5,6], and to understand the regulation of carotenogenesis related to astaxanthin biosynthesis [79], especially astaxanthin accumulation in response to
various stress conditions, such as nutrient stress, excess sodium acetate
along with iron, salinity, light intensity and elevated temperature [8,10,
11]. Results showed that accumulation of astaxanthin in H. pluvialis is
triggered when the cells are exposed to various stresses [12].
In addition to various efforts to improve growth and astaxanthin accumulation [5,6,13], as an alternative approach, chemicals, which
Corresponding authors.
E-mail addresses: lchen@tju.edu.cn (L. Chen), wwzhang8@tju.edu.cn (W. Zhang).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.algal.2015.07.006
2211-9264/ 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
285
Pathway enrichment analysis was preformed according to our previous publications [11]. Briey, the protocol was conducted according to
KEGG (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes) Database using
the following formula:
NM
ni
:
m1
X M
i
P 1
i0
N
n
286
also enhanced the yield of astaxanthin from 9.9 mg/L to 12.58 mg/L in
Chlorella zongiensis[43]. Carotenoid formation in algal cyst cells enhanced by HO or other active oxygen species (1O2, O
2 , H2O2, and
AO2) might be related to their roles on participating directly in the
carotenogenic enzyme reactions as an oxidizer or an H acceptor [44].
Effect of ROS also triggers antioxidants, such as glutathione (GSH) and
ascorbic acid (AsA) and antioxidant enzymes, such as superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT) and ascorbic peroxidase (APX) [45].
Signal transducers play a key role in the complicated signaling networks in plant and microalgal defense responses [4648]. In the study,
signal transducers SA, JA, ABA were found to enhance astaxanthin accumulation in H. pluvialis by 30.55%, 50.56% and 64.21% at optimal concentration of 0.724 mM, 0.048 mM, and 0.378 mM, respectively (Fig. 1).
Signal transducer treatments did not show obvious effect on cell density
at their optimal concentration (Suppl. Fig. S2), thus the volumetric productivity enhancement was mainly caused by the increased astaxanthin
content. Among these chemicals, ABA treatment presented the most
signicant stimulatory effect on astaxanthin production (33.6 mg/L),
which is 64.21% higher than its DMSO control. Early study showed
that ABA, as an effective regulator for astaxanthin production in
H. pluvialis, induced a morphological change from green vegetative
cells to red cyst cells [49]. More recently, studies found that chemicals
JA and SA could enhance astaxanthin production to 1.458 mg/L and
2.74 mg/L, respectively [19,50]. In addition, methyl jasmonate (MJ),
the methyl ester of JA, was found with roles in regulating expression
of the bkts gene that catalyzes -carotene to canthaxanthin in the
carotenogenesis pathway [51].
In addition, GA3 and metal ion Mg2+ also enhanced volumetric productivity of astaxanthin accumulation by 30.82%, and 29.87% at their
own optimal effective concentration, respectively (Fig. 1). No difference
in terms of growth was observed for the treatments by GA3 and Mg2+
(Suppl. Fig. S2). GA3 was reported to have a positive role on astaxanthin
biosynthesis in H. pluvialis by regulating carotenoid gene expression [18]. 0.7 g/L Mg2+ was also demonstrated to stimulate astaxanthin
accumulation in Phafa rhodozyma with 0.1 g/L Mn2+ and 0.2 g/L Ca2+.
Under the optimal conditions, the astaxanthin yield reached 2.95 mg/L,
which is 1.31 times of that without metal ions [52].
3.2. Targeted LCMS metabolomic analysis
Considering their signicant stimulatory effects, oxidants and signal
transducers could serve as promising chemical modulators for
Table 1
Effect of chemical modulators in astaxanthin.
Type
Chemical
Effect on Ax %
Antioxidant
/
/
0.7
0.01
0.001
107
0.724
0.048
/
0.378
5
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
0.029
/
/
/
/
/
/
20.60 0.81
29.17 4.38
41.91 1.90
32.87 3.01
30.55 0.73
50.56 4.06
/
64.21 3.33
29.87 5.19
/
/
/
/
/
/
30.82 3.37
/
/
/
Oxidant
Signal transducer
Metal ion
Auxin
Gibberellin
Cytokinin
Amines
90
80
D) MV
130
0.7 mM
**
*
110
100
90
10-9 mM
G) GA3
150
140
10-7 mM
90
***
120
110
100
90
**
110
90
Control
Ethanol
***
120
110
100
90
80
Control
10-4 mM
10-3 mM
10-2 mM
**
F) Mg
130
120
110
100
90
80
Control
Control
**
H) JA
170
150
140
**
130
120
110
100
90
80
80
140
140
**
***
C) MB
130
10-1 mM
100
160
**
130
10-2 mM
E) SA
120
170
10-3 mM
130
80
10-5 mM
volumetric production%
Control
volumetric production%
100
Control
80
160
110
140
120
170
**
120
1.0 mM
volumetric production%
volumetric production%
140
0.5 mM
150
130
80
Control
**
volumetric production%
100
160
B) AAPH
volumetric production%
**
140
volumetric production%
110
150
A) H2O2
*
volumetric production%
volumetric production%
120
287
2 mM
5 mM
10 mM
***
I) ABA
160
150
***
140
**
130
120
110
100
90
80
Control
DMSO
0.024 mM
0.048 mM
0.095 mM
Control
DMSO
0.189 mM 0.378 mM
0.757 mM
Fig. 1. Effect of chemical modulators on volumetric production (mg astaxanthin/L liquid). The volumetric production of astaxanthin in the control was set as 100%, and the % changes under
various concentrations of the chemicals were shown. Statistical analysis was conducted as described in the text, as signicance indicated by *: p b 0.05; **: p b 0.01; ***: p b 0.001. A) H2O2;
B) AAPH;C) MB; D) MV; E) SA; F) Mg; G) GA3; H) JA; I) ABA.
analyzed (Suppl. Table S1). For each sample, three biological replicates
were independently prepared and analyzed.
The results of LCMS metabolomic were presented by the PLS-DA
analysis: i) at both time points, three biological replicates of each sample were clearly clustered together, demonstrating a good reproducibility; ii) the samples treated with or without chemical modulators could
be clearly separated in the PLS-DA plots at both time points, indicating
that various metabolic proles occurred upon chemical modulator and
control treatments; in addition, the results also demonstrated that the
LCMS methodology we applied in the study is highly sensitive to
distinguish the cellular responses upon chemical trigger treatments;
iii) in the plots, at 9 d when astaxanthin accumulation nearly reached
the stationary phase, samples treated with chemical modulators were
separated from the controls, in good agreement with the levels of
astaxanthin accumulation; in addition, between various chemicals,
JA and ABA treatments were the furthest from their control, while
AAPH treatment was very close to the control in the plots, illustrating
the different metabolic changes related to astaxanthin content; iv)
well separation of the metabolomic proles of the samples treated
with signal transducer and oxidant was clearly observed at both 6 d
and 9 d for most of the chemicals, suggesting that these two groups of
chemicals have different and distinct regulative mechanisms on cells.
Overall, the results demonstrated that the LCMS methodology used
in the study provided a high analytical resolution to distinguish samples
treated with various chemical modulators (Fig. 2).
To further illustrate the quantitative information of the metabolic
datasets, heat maps of 24 metabolites in all samples at both 6 d and
9 d were generated (Fig. 2). The metabolites detected by LCMS are
mostly unstable metabolites closely related to energy metabolism and
288
B) 9 d
A) 6 d
6d
PC2: 25.74%
PC2: 16.49%
-2
C
DMSO
AAPH
MB
-4
-8
-6
-4
-2
MV
SA
JA
ABA
9d
4
2
0
-2
-4
-6
-8
-6
-2
-0.25
0.25
0.25
Control-6 d-1
Control-6 d-2
Control-6 d-3
DMSO-6 d-1
DMSO-6 d-2
DMSO-6 d-3
AAPH-6 d-1
AAPH-6 d-2
AAPH-6 d-3
MB-6 d-1
MB-6 d-2
MB-6 d-3
MV-6 d-1
MV-6 d-2
MV-6 d-3
SA-6 d-1
SA-6 d-2
SA-6 d-3
JA-6 d-1
JA-6 d-2
JA-6 d-3
ABA-6 d-1
ABA-6 d-2
ABA-6 d-3
Control-6 d-1
Control-6 d-2
Control-6 d-3
DMSO-6 d-1
DMSO-6 d-2
DMSO-6 d-3
AAPH-6 d-1
AAPH-6 d-2
AAPH-6 d-3
MB-6 d-1
MB-6 d-2
MB-6 d-3
MV-6 d-1
MV-6 d-2
MV-6 d-3
SA-6 d-1
SA-6 d-2
SA-6 d-3
JA-6 d-1
JA-6 d-2
JA-6 d-3
ABA-6 d-1
ABA-6 d-2
ABA-6 d-3
-0.25
-4
PC1: 30.53%
PC1: 33.69%
DHAP
ATP
UDP-GCS
3PG
PEP
NADPH
AcCOA
NAD
RiBP
ADP-GCS
GAP
FBP
R5P
GLU
NADH
AMP
NADP
ADP
G6P
F6P
COA
OXA
AKG
FUM
ADP-GCS
RiBP
FBP
ATP
AcCOA
NADPH
DHAP
R5P
GAP
PEP
AMP
F6P
ADP
3PG
NADP
G6P
GLU
NAD
UDP-GCS
NADH
COA
OXA
AKG
FUM
Fig. 2. Score plots of the PLS-DA analysis (upper) and heat maps of LCMS metabolomic proles (low). C represents control media, and different colors represent media supplemented with
indicated various chemical modulators. The scattered plots represent biological replicates in PLS-DA. PC1 is principle component one and PC2 is principal component two. The number
represents biological replicates in the heat map. A) 6 d; B) 9 d. (For interpretation of the references to color in this gure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
metabolites in TCA cycle (i.e., AKG and FUM) under oxidative stress is
consistence with a previous study in P. chrysosporium[54]; and iii) between the two groups of chemicals, GAP and R5P were clearly downregulated in AAPH and MB treatments at 6 d, while up-regulated in all
signal transducer treatments suggesting that oxidant and signal transducer might have different regulatory mechanisms to astaxanthin biosynthesis in H. pluvialis. Interestingly, MV and SA, although in different
chemical groups, showed similar metabolic proles at 9 d. In MV and
SA treatments, glycolysis seemed strengthened, with up-regulation of
PEP and G6P, F6P, FBP, and 3PG, respectively, suggesting that MV and
SA might induce astaxanthin by triggering glycolysis process to generate more precursors of carotenoid. Consistently, a previous metabolite
proling of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii under sulfur stress showed that
the concentrations of a number of phosphorylated glycolysis intermediates, G6P, F6P and 3PG increased by 3.7, 3.2 and 2.8 fold, respectively
[55].
3.3. Untargeted GC-MS metabolomics analysis
Using a GCMS metabolomic protocol developed previously [33,34],
we determined the metabolic proles of samples treated with different
chemical modulators. Following the same experimental design as
LCMS analysis described above, cell samples with or without chemical modulators were collected at two time points (i.e., 6 d and 9 d)
and analyzed. For each sample, three biological replicates were independently prepared and analyzed. The GCMS analysis identied 94
chemically classied metabolites from H. pluvialis cells, including a
large number of compounds such as fatty acids, amino acids, carbohydrate and terpenoids (Suppl. Table S2). Although some of these chemical modulators have been reported in cells, our GCMS metabolomic
analysis detected none of them, suggesting that their intracellular concentration may be very low. In the early studies, a maximum content of
H2O2 was reported to be 5.93 mol/g fresh weight in Brassica juncea
plants under Cd stress treatment [56], and a maximum ABA content in
maize kernels was reported under 350 pg/mg liquid [57]. These concentrations in cells are far less than the chemical modulator concentrations
we used to increase astaxanthin in this study.
The metabolic proles were presented by PLS-DA score plots to
show the similarities and differences between metabolomic proles
(Fig. 3). The features of score plots of the GCMS metabolomic proles
were similar to the LCMS metabolomic proles as we described before,
such as overall good reproducibility between biological replicates and
clear separation between different sample clusters. At 6 d, samples
treated with chemical modulators were separated from the controls,
and the relative distances of the chemical modulator treated samples
from the controls were inconsistent with the levels of astaxanthin accumulation. Moreover, the samples treated with oxidants and signal
transducers were separated from each other except MV, consistent
with the results of LCMS analysis, illustrating that these two groups
of chemical modulators might have distinct effects on cellular metabolism in H. pluvialis. At 9 d, all samples treated with chemical modulators
tend to be clustered together away from the control, which might be
due to the cell aging that caused the similar metabolic responses at
this stage. In addition, the results also demonstrated that the integrated
GCMS and LCMS based metabolomics could encompass a better coverage of both unstable and stable intercellular metabolites as GCMS
based metabolomics can achieve a good coverage of polar metabolites,
such as fatty acids and amino acids, and permit analysis of a wide
range of chemical metabolite classes in a single run [58], while LCMS
can cover unstable metabolites that is incompatible with GCMS
analysis.
PC2: 13.41%
289
A) 6d
-4
-8
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
10
PC1: 16.28%
PC2: 12.87%
B) 9d
-4
-8
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
PC1: 16.53%
10
C
C+DMSO
AAPH
MB
MV
SA
JA
ABA
Fig. 3. Score plots of the PLS-DA analysis of GCMS metabolomic proles. C represents control media, and different colors represent conditions supplemented with various chemical modulators as indicated. The scattered plots represent biological replicates. A) 6 d; B) 9 d. PC1 is principal component one and PC2 is principal component two, respectively. (For interpretation
of the references to color in this gure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
290
Table 2
Hub metabolites, member metabolites and pathways clustered into each of responsive modules.a
Modules Phenotype associated Association (r2) p-value
Metabolites
Hub metabolites
Pathway enrichment
6 d-M1
Oxidant
Signal transducer
0.54
0.82
0.006
L-Mimosine, glycerol, porphine, fumaric acid, L-serine, capric acid, D-malic acid, L-pyroglutamic acid, L-cysteine,
8 107 alpha ketoglutaric acid, 1,3-diaminopropane, L-asparagine, putrescine, D-mannose, behenic acid, sucrose,
6 d-M2
Signal transducer
0.5
0.01
6 d-M3
Oxidant
0.51
0.01
9 d-M1
Oxidant
Signal transducer
0.5
0.87
0.01
3 108
9 d-M2
Signal transducer
0.57
0.003
9 d-M3
Oxidant
0.82
9 107
D(+)-trehalose, squalene
Benzoic acid, 2-amino-1-phenylethanol, glycine, uracil, L-threonine, nicotinamide, 1-methyl nicotinamide, citric
acid, tyrosine, isopropyl-beta-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside, palmitic acid, allo inositol, DL-3,4-dihydroxyphenyl
glycol, heptadecanoic acid, stearic acid, arachidic acid, dioctyl phthalate
L-Valine, L-norleucine,
phosphoric acid, L-proline, L-glutamic acid, phenylalanine, pipecolic acid, lauric acid,
dihydroxyacetone phosphate, glycerol-1-phosphate, myristic acid, beta-glycerolphosphate, DL-isoleucine,
maltose, L-ornithine, 3-phosphoglycerate, cellobiose, fructose, adenosine
Urea, succinic acid, D-malic acid, phenylalanine, dihydroxyacetone phosphate, glycerol-1-phosphate,
3-phosphoglycerate, citric acid, D-allose, palmitic acid, cytindine-5-monophosphate, linoleic acid, stearic acid,
arachidic acid
Adenosine-5-monophosphate, squalene, adenosine, allo-inositol, aspartic acid, DL-3,4-dihydroxyphenyl glycol,
D-lyxos, L-(+)
L-Mimosine,
lactic acid, L-alanine, lauric acid, L-valine, malonic acid, sucrose, tagatose, talose
acid) hub metabolites signicantly associated with astaxanthin contents at 6 d and 9 d, respectively (Fig. 4). At 6 d, i) in the 6 d-M1 module,
the two hub metabolites, fumaric acid and D-malic acid were identied
and connected to several other metabolites in the module. A derivative
of fumaric acid, fumaric acid-molasses, has been reported previously to
promote biosynthesis of canthaxanthin to 9.2 mg/L in Brevibacterium sp.
strain KY-4313 [59]. Malic acid was reported to have a stimulatory effect
on the formation of astaxanthin in C. zongiensis since it could be
B) 6 d-M2
A) 6 d-M1
Glycine
Putrescine
Arachidic acid
D-malic acid
2-amino-1-phenylethanol
L-pyroglutamic acid
Palmitic acid
Porphine
Stearic acid
Fumaric acid
Heptadecanoic acid
Squalene
Benzoic acid
D-mannose
D) 9 d-M1
C) 6 d-M3
Stearic scid
Phenylalanine
Arachidic acid
Phosphoric acid
Urea
Maltose
L-proline
L-norleucine
Succinic acid
Lauric acid
Citric acid
L-glutamic acid
Cytindine-5-monophosphate
Dihydroxyacetone phosphate
Myristic acid
Linoleic acid
Cellobiose
F) 9 d-M3
E) 9 d-M2
Sucrose
Porphine
D-lyxose
Raffinose
Tagatose
Adenosine
Maltotriose
Fumaric acid
Allo-inositol
L-alanine
Lauric acid
DL-3,4-dihydroxyphenyl glycol
L-mimosine
Glyceric acid
Adenine
Fig. 4. Hub metabolites and their metabolic proles as represented by node and edge graph. A) D-Malic acid and fumaric acid for 6 d-M1; B) arachidic acid for 6 d-M2; C) maltose
for 6 d-M3; D) urea for 9 d-M1; E) sucrose for 9 d-M2; F) fumaric acid for 9 d-M3. Only those nodes with high connectivity strength as displayed near the edges were shown. Hub
metabolites were marked in bold.
291
292
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by the funds from the National High-tech
RD Program (National 863 program) (No. 2012AA02A707), the National Basic Research Program of China (National 973 program) (No.
2014CB745101, No. 2012CB721101 and No. 2011CBA00803), the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China (No. 20120032110020 and
No. 20130032120022), and the Tianjin Municipal Science and Technology Commission.
References
[1] M. Guerin, M. Huntley, M. Olaizola, Haematococcus astaxanthin: applications for
human health and nutrition, Trends Biotechnol. 21 (5) (2003) 210216, http://dx.
doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7799(03)00078-7.
[2] R. Lorenz, G. Cysewski, Commercial potential for Haematococcus microalgae as a
natural source of astaxanthin, Trends Biotechnol. 18 (4) (2000) 160167, http://
dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7799(00)01433-5.
[3] W. Poonkum, S. Powtongsook, P. Pavasant, Astaxanthin induction in microalga
H. pluvialis with at panel airlift photobioreactors under indoor and outdoor conditions, Prep. Biochem. Biotechnol. 45 (1) (2014) 117, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/
10826068.2013.867871.
[4] J. Park, et al., Enhanced astaxanthin production from microalga, Haematococcus
pluvialis by two-stage perfusion culture with stepwise light irradiation, Bioprocess
Biosyst. Eng. 37 (10) (2014) 20392047, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00449-0141180-y.
[5] W. Zhang, et al., Attached cultivation of Haematococcus pluvialis for astaxanthin production, Bioresour. Technol. 158 (2014) 329335, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.
biortech.2014.02.044.
[6] J. Li, et al., An economic assessment of astaxanthin production by large scale cultivation of Haematococcus pluvialis, Biotechnol. Adv. 29 (6) (2011) 568574, http://dx.
doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2011.04.001.
[7] S. Boussiba, Carotenogenesis in the green alga Haematococcus pluvialis: cellular
physiology and stress response, Physiol. Plant. 108 (2) (2000) 111117, http://dx.
doi.org/10.1034/j.1399-3054.2000.108002111.x.
[8] Z. Gao, et al., Comparison of astaxanthin accumulation and biosynthesis gene expression of three Haematococcus pluvialis strains upon salinity stress, J. Appl. Phycol.
(2014) 18, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10811-014-0491-3.
[9] S. Kathiresan, et al., Regulation of astaxanthin and its intermediates through cloning
and genetic transformation of -carotene ketolase in Haematococcus pluvialis,
J. Biotechnol. 196197 (2015) 3341.
[10] Y. Wu, et al., Lipid-rich microalgal biomass production and nutrient removal by
Haematococcus pluvialis in domestic secondary efuent, Ecol. Eng. 60 (2013)
155159, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2013.07.066.
293