You are on page 1of 3

County of Sacramento v. Turbomeca, S.A. et al Doc.

Case 2:07-cv-01398-WBS-DAD Document 7 Filed 07/30/2007 Page 1 of 3

7 I N T H E U N I T E D STATES DISTRICT COURT

8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
ERIC HENRIKSON, an individual;
10 IRIS KIEVERNAGEL, individually
and as administrator of the
11 estate of JOSEPH KIEVERNAGEL;
PATSY KIEVERNAGEL; JOSEPH
12 KIEVERNAGEL; KATHLEEN HAMILTON
and THOMAS BLOUNT, individually
13 and as successors in interest to
the estate of KEVIN BLOUNT,
14
Plaintiffs,
15 v. CIV. NO. S-06-01563
WBS DAD
16
TURBOMECA, S.A., a French
17 Corporation, LA SOCIETE
ANONYME TURBOMECA FRANCE, a
18 French Corporation, TURBOMECA RELATED CASE ORDER
USA, a Texas Corporation,
19 TURBOMECA ENGINE CORPORATION,
a Texas corporation,
20

21
Defendants.
22 /

23 COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, CIV. NO. S-07-01398


LKK KJM
24 Lien Claimant.
/
25

26
Examination of the above-entitled actions
27
reveals that they are related within the meaning of

Dockets.Justia.com
Case 2:07-cv-01398-WBS-DAD Document 7 Filed 07/30/2007 Page 2 of 3

1 Local Rule 123(a)(E.D. Cal. 1984). The plaintiffs in


2 both cases seek damages from the same defendants
3 arising out of the same incident. Accordingly, the
4 assignment of the matters to the same judge is likely
5
to effect a substantial saving of judicial effort and
6
is also likely to be convenient for the parties.
7
The parties should be aware that relating the
8
cases under Local Rule 123 merely has the result that
9
both actions are assigned to the same judge; no
10
consolidation of the actions is effected. Under the
11
regular practice of this court, related cases are
12
generally assigned to the judge and magistrate to whom
13
the first filed action was assigned.
14
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the action
15

16
denominated County of Sacramento v. Turbomeca, S.A., et

17 al., No. Civ. S-07-01398 LKK KJM be, and the same

18 hereby is, reassigned to Judge William B. Shubb and

19 Magistrate Dale A. Drozd for all further proceedings,

20 and any dates currently set in this reassigned case


21 only are hereby VACATED. Henceforth, the caption on
22 documents filed in the reassigned case shall be shown
23 as County of Sacramento v. Turbomeca, S.A., et al., No.
24 Civ. S-07-01398 WBS DAD
25
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the
26
Court make appropriate adjustment in the assignment of
27
//
Case 2:07-cv-01398-WBS-DAD Document 7 Filed 07/30/2007 Page 3 of 3

civil cases to compensate for this reassignment.


1 IT IS SO ORDERED.
2 DATED: July 27, 2007
3

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

You might also like