Professional Documents
Culture Documents
insulated cryogenic transfer lines. The results show that there is good agreement
between theoretical and experimental cool-down curves. The integral method is
shown to be an accurate way to determine the position of cooling front as the
cool-down proceeds. It was also found that the mass flow rate does not significantly
affect the cool-down o f short transfer lines.
C R Y O G E N I C S . N O V E M B E R 1974
Thermocouple
Thermoeouple
,3 \
,4
Insulation
IT Transfersystem
II
I I Pressure gauge
d--h
II
_P ess0 e regu,at,ng
II
v'v"
Mercury II
manometer
Copper tube
II
II
L2
II
....
/!i\
Receii~ver k.j i
I
i i
- Spring balance ~
IU
cylinder
r_--)
Test section
615
tical zero mass flow rate cool-down curve and the points
on the experimental curve for different supply dewar
pressures are plotted on Fig.3. It can be seen that the
analytical zero mass flow rate curve very reasonably
approximates the experimental cool-down curve for all
mass flow rates. This fact proves that the supply dewar
pressure, which in turn is proportional to the mass flow
rate, does not influence the cool-down rate. The theoretical
cool-down curve is obtained using the pool boiling correlations only for calculating the heat flux to the fluid. This
suggests that the contribution of forced convection to heat
flux inside the tube is negligibly small for short transfer
sections. This result is in confirmation with the results
obtained by Steward et al 7 and Sfinivasan et al.a
Fig.2
320
Analytical curve
Experimental points
28C
240
20O
v
160
I-
120
80
40
o
Fig.3
616
I0
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
I00
I10
foam
Time, s
310,
Experimental points
Supply dewar
Symbol
pressure, cm Hg
0
I00
v 300
90
2
E
Supply dewar
pressure, cm H9
Symbol
I=
280
13.0
"
II.2
13.0
"
o
11.2
15.0
I- 50
7.0
10.2
12.0
4O
120
;/
7.0
10.2
12.0
70
60
IQO
II.O
T h e o r e t i c a l curve
80
10.(3
I1.0
~- 2 9 0
60
180
240
300
360
30
420
20
Time, s
IO
Fig.4
Radius, cm
Fig.5
to the outer surface of insulation even at the end of cooldown, the insulation thickness used in the experiments is
slightly more than the mininmm predicted by the analysis.
Thus, the value predicted by the analysis for the insulation
thickness is pessimistic.
References
Conclusions
CRYOGENICS.
NOVEMBER
1974
617