MADHAVI MADAM DOCKET MODELS

(ORIGINAL)

P.R.C. Committal order docket:-

Committal order is pronounced in open Court (V.S.O.).

In the result, the case against the accused is committed to the Honble
Court of Session, under Section 209(a) Cr.P.C. The accused is/are on bail and
shall continue on bail during and until conclusion of trial under Section 209(b)
Cr.P.C.

The accused is/are directed to appear on receipt of summons from

Court. The case record, documents and articles, if any shall be submitted to
the Court of Session under Section 209(c) Cr.P.C. The factum of commitment
shall be notified to the Public Prosecutor under Section 209(d) Cr.P.C. When
enquired A1 to A4 stated that they have means to engage counsel in Sessions
Court.

If accused is in jail:- (Original)

All the accused except ..are on bail.

The Superintendent, Sub-

Jail/District Jail/Central Jail .is directed to produce accused before the

Sessions Court on receipt of intimation.

The accused is in Central Jail and shall continue so during and until
conclusion of trial under Section 209(b) Cr.P.C.

FINAL REPORTS: (Original)

Summons

served.

Complainant

present.

(Sworn

statement

of

complainant recorded). He/She reported no objection to final report. Perused

F.I.R. and Final report and other material. Satisfied. Final report accepted and
case recorded as undetectable. Issue proceedings accordingly.

SUMOONS SERVED, NO REPRESENTATION: (Original)

Complainant called absent. No representation. It shows he got no objection to
final report.

Perused F.I.R. and Final report and other material.

Final report accepted and case recorded as undetectable.

Satisfied.

Issue proceedings

accordingly.

(Contd2)
DEFAULT SENTENCE TO THE RESPONDENT IN M.Cs. (Original)

Petitioner and the respondent present. Respondent was directed to pay

balance maintenance amount, it is seen from the docket order he has been
seeking adjournments for payment of maintenance amount one pretext or the
other. He has not paid maintenance amount even today. Perused the orders in

main M.C. which clearly shows that the respondent is having means to pay in
the above circumstances I felt it is fit case to order default sentence to the
respondent.

In the result, the respondent is sentenced for one month as default

sentence. Call on

APPOINTMENT OF ADVOCATE COMMISSIONER FOR EXECUTION OF NBW:

(Original)
Heard the counsel for the petitioner.

This is the petition filed by the

counsel for the petitioner seeking appointment of the advocate Commissioner

to arrest and produce the respondent before this Court as police fails to
execute the warrant against the respondent since long time.

Perused the record. In spite of several opportunities were given to the

police they were failed to execute the warrant against the respondent. After
considering the case facts in the interest of Justice, Sri appointed as
advocate-Commissioner to execute the warrant against the respondent, on
proper identification and for production before this Court. His fee is fixed at
Rs. .

Before issuing warrant, concerned police, are directed to return the

warrant already issued. Further the advocate Commissioner is directed not to

use excessive force while arresting the respondent. The SHO of the concerned
P.S. is directed to assist the advocate Commissioner in execution of the
warrant against the respondent. The petitioner is directed to accompany the
advocate Commissioner for proper identification of the respondent.

****

ADMISSION DOCKET (ORIGINAL)

Dt.6.6.2012
Accused present.

He is examined under Section 251 Cr.P.C. for the

offence under Section 338 of IPC. The substance of accusation leveled against
him is explained, read over to the accused in Telugu. He admitted the offence
and pleaded mercy of the Court.

Warning is given to the accused as to the

sentence he is going to receive by this Court for the admitted offence. In spite
he admitted the guilt of offence voluntarily.

Hence, the accused is found guilty for the offence under Section 338 of
IPC and he is convicted under Section 252 Cr.P.C. and sentenced to pay fine
amount of Rs.1,000/- for the offence under Section 338 of IPC and in default,
he has to undergo simple imprisonment for six months.

Bail bonds of the

accused, if any, shall stands cancelled after appeal time is over.

I AJFCM.

Dt.6.9.2012
This is a petition filed under Section 457 Cr.P.C., by the petitioner/owner of the
property

i.e.,

Bajaj Pulsar black colour motor cycle bearing No. AP 37 AV 7570

praying the Court to return the said property towards interim custody.
Notice given to the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor.

He opposed since it

requires for trial and order may be passed after due enquiry about ownership.
The learned counsel for the petitioner/owner contended that she is the owner of
the property and she will produce the same as and when required by the Court and
she will produce sufficient surety for the satisfaction of the Court and she filed Xerox
copies of ration card and registration certificate for proof along with the petition and
ultimately prays to return the said property for interim custody.
Heard both sides. Perused the record.

During

the Investigating Officer has seized the said property.

the course of investigation,

After perusal of the record, it

is a fit case to return the above said property to the petitioner/owner towards interim
custody.
In the result, the petition is allowed and the property i.e., four sovereigns of
gold nanutradu with two mangala sutrams is ordered to be returned to the
petitioner/de facto-complainant of the property on execution of self bond of
Rs.1,20,000/- with a direction not to sell ,change or mortgage it and the petitioner/de
facto-complainant shall produce the said property as and when required by the Court.
Accordingly, the petition is allowed.
I AJFCM.

Dt.29.4.2013
This is a petition filed under Section 457 Cr.P.C., by the petitioner/3 rd party of
the property i.e., Hero Honda Passion pro(Drum-self spoke, wheels) bearing No.AP 37
AY 4371 praying the Court to return the said property towards interim custody.
Notice given to other sides. The learned Assistant Public Prosecutor endorsed
that it is necessary for trial. Accused counsel endorsed that he has no objection.
(Contd)

(Contd)
The petitioner/3rd party contended that he is the owner of the property and he
is ready to produce the original C book before the Court as and when ordered and he
is unable to attend to his daily duties and facing problems and ultimately prays to
return the said property for interim custody.
Heard both sides. Perused the record.
the Investigating Officer
property.

After

has

perusal

of

seized

the

During

the course of investigation,

said

the

record, it is a fit case to return the above

said

property

to

the

petitioner/3rd party of the property towards interim custody.

In the result, the petition is allowed and the property i.e., Hero Honda Passion
pro(Drum-self spoke, wheels) bearing No.AP 37 AY 4371 is ordered to be returned to
the petitioner/3rd party of the property on execution

of

bond

of Rs.50,000/-

with one surety with a direction not to change the colour of the vehicle, or sell or
mortgage it and the petitioner/3 rd party of the property shall produce the said
property as and when required by the Court.
Accordingly, the petition is allowed.
I AJFCM.

Dt.3.9.2012
This is a petition filed under Section 457 Cr.P.C., by the petitioner/owner of the
property/A2 i.e.,

TATA Safari bearing No.AP 33B 5577 praying the Court to return the

said property towards interim custody.

Notice given to the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor. He

opposed since it

requires for trial.

The learned counsel for the petitioner/owner/A2 contended that he is the registered
owner and having valid legal documents to prove the ownership and the 1 st
respondent/complainant has seized the said property and it is kept with the police
station premises.

He also contended that there is no way concerned to the said

vehicle regarding the alleged offence and he is giving undertaking that he will produce
the said vehicle as and when required by the Court and he will
nature of the

not

change

the

vehicle or colour of the vehicle or mortgage the vehicle or sell the vehicle to anybody
and it is so long kept at the police station premises, it will be rusted and the material
parts will be damaged and hence prayed to return the said vehicle for interim custody.
Heard both sides. Perused the record.

During

the Investigating Officer has seized the said property.

the course of investigation,

After perusal of the record, it

is a fit case to return the above said property to the petitioner/owner/A2

towards

interim custody.
In the result, the petition is allowed and the property i.e., TATA SAFARI bearing
No.AP 33 B 5577 is ordered to be returned to the petitioner/owner/A2 of the property
on execution of bond of Rs.4,00,000/- with one surety with a direction not to change
its colour, sell or mortgage it and the petitioner/owner/A2 shall produce the said
property as and when required by the Court.
Accordingly, the petition is allowed.
I AJFCM.