Professional Documents
Culture Documents
FACTS: Respondent Cucueco filed a case for specific performance with damages against
petitioner Platinum Plans pursuant to an alleged contract of sale executed by them for the
purchase of a condominium unit.
petitioner Platinum Plans Phils a condominium unit he was leasing from the latter for P 4
million payable in 2 installments of P2 million with the following terms and conditions:
a.
b. He will issue a post-dated check for P1.9 million to be encashed on September 30, 1993 on
the condition that he will stop paying rentals for the said unit after September 30
c.
In case Platinum Plans has an outstanding loan of less than P2 million with the bank as of
December 1993, Cucueco shall assume the same and pay the difference from the remaining P2
million
Cucueco likewise claimed that Platinum Plans accepted his offerby encashing
the checks he issued. However, he was surprised to learn that Platinum Plans had
changed the due date of the installment payment to September 30, 1993.
Respondent argued that there was a perfected sale between him and Platinum
plans and as such, he may validly demand from the petitioner to execute the necessary
deed of sale transferring ownership and title over the property in his favor
Platinum Plans denied Cucuecos allegations and asserted that Cucuecos initial
down payment was forfeited based on the following terms and conditions:
a.
The terms of payment only includes two installments (August 1993 and September 1993)
b. In case of non-compliance on the part of the vendee, all installments made shall be forfeited
in favor of the vendor Platinum Plans
c.
Ownership over the property shall not pass until payment of the full purchase price
Petitioners anchor their argument on the claim that there was no meeting of the
Upon appeal, CA held that there was a perfected contract despite the fact that
both parties never agreed on the date of payment of the remaining balance. CA ordered
Cucueco to pay the remaining balance of the purchase price and for Platinum Plans, to
execute a deed of sale over the property
In the present case, neither side was able to produce any written evidence documenting the actual
terms of their agreement. The trial court was correct in finding that there was no meeting of
minds in this case considering that the acceptance of the offer was not absolute and
uncondition. In earlier cases, the SC held that before a valid and binding contract of sale can
exist, the manner of payment of the purchase price must first be established.
Furthermore, the reservation of the title in the name of Platinum Plans clearly indicates an
intention of the parties to enter into a contract of sell.Where the seller promises to execute a
deed of absolute sale upon completion of the payment of purchase price, the agreement is a
contract to sell.
The court cannot, in this case, step in to cure the deficiency by fixing the period pursuant to:
1. The relief sought by Cucueco was for specific performance to compel Platinum
Plans to receive the balance of the purchase price.
2. The relief provide in Art 1592 only applies to contracts of sale
3. Because of the differing dates set by both parties, the court would have no basis
for granting Cucueco an extension of time within which to pay the outstanding balance