The Supreme Court of the Philippines ruled on the case of People of the Philippines vs. Roger Tejero regarding the rape of AAA. The Court affirmed that civil indemnity and moral damages are mandatory for rape victims. For the crime against AAA, the appellate court awarded P50,000 in moral damages but the Supreme Court added another P50,000 in civil indemnity. Since AAA's minority was an aggravating circumstance and exemplary damages are justified in such cases, the Court further ordered Tejero to pay P30,000 in exemplary damages for each rape count, on top of the civil indemnity and moral damages.
Original Description:
Cil
Original Title
People of the Philippines vs. Roger Tejero, G.R. No. 187744, June 20, 2012
The Supreme Court of the Philippines ruled on the case of People of the Philippines vs. Roger Tejero regarding the rape of AAA. The Court affirmed that civil indemnity and moral damages are mandatory for rape victims. For the crime against AAA, the appellate court awarded P50,000 in moral damages but the Supreme Court added another P50,000 in civil indemnity. Since AAA's minority was an aggravating circumstance and exemplary damages are justified in such cases, the Court further ordered Tejero to pay P30,000 in exemplary damages for each rape count, on top of the civil indemnity and moral damages.
The Supreme Court of the Philippines ruled on the case of People of the Philippines vs. Roger Tejero regarding the rape of AAA. The Court affirmed that civil indemnity and moral damages are mandatory for rape victims. For the crime against AAA, the appellate court awarded P50,000 in moral damages but the Supreme Court added another P50,000 in civil indemnity. Since AAA's minority was an aggravating circumstance and exemplary damages are justified in such cases, the Court further ordered Tejero to pay P30,000 in exemplary damages for each rape count, on top of the civil indemnity and moral damages.
People of the Philippines vs. Roger Tejero, G.R. No.
187744, June 20, 2012
DOCTRINE: The award of civil indemnity to the rape victim is mandatory upon the finding that rape took place. Moral damages, on the other hand, are awarded to rape victims without need of proof other than the fact of rape under the assumption that the victim suffered moral injuries from the experience she underwent. When a crime is committed with an aggravating circumstance either as qualifying or generic, an award of exemplary damages is justified under Article 2230 of the New Civil Code. FACTS: Tejero, herein appellant, was charged and, later, found guilty of three counts of rape, and was ordered to pay the private complainant AAA the amount of Fifty Thousand Pesos (P50,000.00) in moral damages. When Tejero appealed, the appellate court affirmed judgment of conviction and modified the said judgment by adding an additional amount of Fifty Thousand Pesos (P50,000.00) as civil indemnity. In view of the penalty imposed, the case was elevated to the Supreme Court for review. ISSUE: Whether or not the awards of civil indemnity, moral damages, and exemplary damages are appropriate in this case. HELD: The award of civil indemnity to the rape victim is mandatory upon the finding that rape took place. Moral damages, on the other hand, are awarded to rape victims without need of proof other than the fact of rape under the assumption that the victim suffered moral injuries from the experience she underwent. Based on prevailing jurisprudence, the award of P50,000.00 as civil indemnity and another P50,000.00 as moral damages for each count of simple rape are proper. Conformably with the ruling in People v. Esperanza, when either one of the qualifying circumstances of relationship or minority (for qualified rape under Article 266-B of the Revised Penal Code) is omitted or lacking, that which is pleaded in the Information and proved by the evidence may be considered as an aggravating circumstance. As such, AAAs minority may be considered as an aggravating circumstance. When a crime is committed with an aggravating circumstance either as qualifying or generic, an award of exemplary damages is justified under Article 2230 of the New Civil Code. Consequently, AAA is entitled to the additional award of exemplary damages in the amount of P30,000.00 for each count of simple rape. Hence, the Supreme Court ordered the appellant to pay the victim AAA the amounts of P50,000.00 as civil indemnity, P50,000.00 as moral damages, and P30,000.00 as exemplary damages for every count with interest at the rate of six percent (6%) per annum from the finality of the judgment until fully paid.