-

,,,,

tition with capitalilsm that was supposed ,to lead to thetriumph

of
socialism. Khrushchev was not a1t.ogether explicit i n t,his point,but
what .hmesaid to tlhe President of
Mali was sufficiently indicative.
Another
question,
(of course,
is
whether Cotmecon can
really
provide an effective answer to athe Common Market.
Until
only
a
few
months ago, t h e chief Russian ideological review, Conzmulzirt, boasted
inits Fsebruary issue that, .as distinct Iffrom the Com8mon Market
countries,there
is in (Comeoon a
sacredrespect
forthe
sovereignty
and national intecests of each Imernberstate;no
decision can be tNak,en
without the consent of the country
affected. Theartlcle
noted with
satisfaction thatlabout chree-quarters
of the foreign-trade Iturnlover of the
Comecon states was with the csountries of the worldsystem o,f socialism-which
presumably includes
China, thongh she is not offiicially a
Comeconmember,
anymore.than
are North Vietnalm or North Korea.
There is n o d o h t ahat the Comecon oountrieshave
so far -been a
much less integratedbodythan
the Europe of the SIX.Establishof Stalin,
ed in 1949, inthedays
when ,cooper~ationyy (betweenthe Soviet Union and the Peoples Democracies was still very much a one-way
affair (thatwas
one Iceason why

Yugoslayiadropped
,out in 19481,
Comecon was dlormant for a number
of years, e,speeially naiter Stalins
death.
Latterly,
there
have
been
some spectacular joint achiwements,
such as bhe Friendship , pipeline
which will link the Trans-Volga oilfieldswithEasternGermany,Hungaryand
Czechoslovakia. But the
66.
Integration is verylimited;even
the currencies of the memlb,er states
arenot
,mutuallyconvereible;
and
since sovereignty has been
an underlying priniciple o f the organization,
Colmecondoes not send out orders,
but only recommendations, and these
are often ignored.
I

THE Comeconcommuniqukissued

after
its
recent two-day meeti,ng
dwelt lboth on. achievemenw and future plans. Among the !achievements
wast,he 13 per cent annual increase
in theindustrial p,aodu.ction of the
Comeconcountries;
butno figures
weregiven
$or agriculture,
except
that the socialized sector had now
gone up to 90 per cent. As for ehe
futupe, the com,muniq.uk demanded
the calling laof
conferen,ce that
would set up a World Trade Organizationandstressed
that all the Socialist countries wanted ,to trade with
the capitalist countcies. It also outlined in very general terms the much
CC
deeper and more extensive &mutual
cooperationplanned#by Colmecon in

,
I / .

*/1,

(2

%,.
,I
,I

..I

matters like mutual te&&ea~ aid,

joint capital -investments.:;aad .t h e
rational division of lab&- a11 of
whioh would tendt o c&ad$ before
long,a uni,form - standd?d%f living
and ecmomic ~devt!l:opment& all the
., ,mernber
countf-ies.
,,J.It is perhaps signi,ficant that the
word- .so often-used [by. Comeconin
the
past,
namely
soydrejgnty,
should not have figured in athe communiquk. Wthat is more, the Pmvda
editorial on the lfoll~win,g~daystressed the fact that .the
Coimecon conference had reoognized .hat it was
an essential ,cfond,itionlor a ,successful further devebopinent~ cif tionomic
cooperation that the role, huilmrity
am? rerpo~zsibiZityof t h e Council of
E,conomic Mutual kid and7& all its
organs be greatly heightened. (Italics added.) These hints at,-soihekind
of supra-nationalitywere ktrengthened b y M~oscowsrecent - announcement of the creation of: aComecon
,executive committee to be headed by
a new Deputy Premielr of the Soviet
Union, Veniamin E. Dy;mshits.
A puzzling point in allthese goings-on was the absence from the
Comecon meeting .of anb * Chinese
representative,oreyen
II ,observer.
Chinas trade, relations -with both
the #Comeconcountries and8 the outsideworld may well be:ra:mong the
thingsthat do, Terhapi,; giveMr.
Khrushchev sleepless nights: .
I.

*.

,
I

:.

7.

..
b y Lincoln I@Fs&n
,

1 ,

THE DEATH of someonewho has Ina Claire. The lightness,justness

given. you intense pleasure,even if

you nevermet,ammountsalmost
to
the death of a personal friend. Having heard the news 011 the radio and
knowing how I f,dt albout Marilyn
Monroe, an artist friend wroteme
fromInd~onesia: I liked everything
abouther;(mainly
her vpotwer that
outwitted the hungryweakfor
so
long.
Extravagant claims
need
notbe
made for ,.her capacities ,as The complete
actress;
she never
had
the
chance to d,evelop them. B u t asa
classic comedienne (of grace, delicacy
a n d happy wonder, she certainly bas
had no peer !since \Billie Burke or

MARILYN MONROE: 1926-1962

jV.,

of most of us, we cannorkhow. But

andrhythm in herclowningoften
it is possib1.e that her .gift$
,%ere far
_,, .
held hmts of somethingmore pene- more in the sca1.e of the:prosceniumtrating.Her comic tone was some- frame rhan the camera-fralne.
timesdisturbinglyironic;her
perImagination !boggles a t tlhe oversonal style was more lyric than nattime that wo,uld have * 6 e m loaded
urallstlc. Irony and lyricism are two ontothe rehearsal schedq1,e ;of any
prime components of the grand man- Shakespearean reprtorycompany
ner. W,hether or not she could have placed athertender
mdr$es, But
succeededas LadyMacbeth, which her notorious tardiness
.or7procrasshe solemnly said she wanted t o play tination (it never[bankrupted anym e day, after what she lhad done to body exc,ept herself)
so irritated the manipullators for @horn she
herself withthe aid and,a,betment
grossed lonly fort);-three ,mi$lion dalLINCOLN KIRSTEIN has been lars-not, alas, ihe two hundredmilvice president of the American lion that wasfirst
reported-may
Shakespeare Theatre
Fertival
and not have been merely compdsive beAcademy since its inception.
havior. Does, it never dccur-bo .the
2

&

-$%el N&TION
,

producer,directot. and idnvestor that

a perfmlningartist ,atthepeak
of
her craft may always want t'o gwe a
peak performance; and that often, for
reasonsphysicalas
well aspsychological, she may not fed u p t o t h e
peakshe kn'ows ,she canattain? In
thetheztre, a star is prepared by
weeks of New
York
rehearsals,
months of provincialtours,
before
settling into the final !pattern of rhe
Broadway run. rSome seductive movie
directorsmanage
togetpeak
performances out of their stars faster or
oftenerthanaverage,butbyand
large
the
Amecican
film
industry
rarelyprovidesworkingconditions
comparable to the comfort of a successful run in 'our commercial t,heatre (and we cannot seven make comparison with what prevails inmore
cultivatedcountries,
alblble to afford
institutionaltheatre:thetheatre
of
Stanislavsky, of Brecht, of Barrault
or Olivier). Everyt,hing shot in Hollykood, or plmntd there, isgeared
for hysteria and the bet on lucky, i,mprovised takes and type casting.
I

SO Marily,n Monroe lparalyzed pro-

duction Iby demanding retakes: maybe she, cook sixty of asinglescene

andhadthemallprinted.Maybe
thesixtieth wasn't as goodasthe
third. And Aaybe, at the same time,
she had a c'onscience abrout the caslh
she was costingherpartnersand
manipulators. Ghe knew what money
w'as about, since she was born with
none,diedwithlittleandvalued
it
chie,fly far the pleasure of giving it
t o Feople poorer tchan herself.
Perhaps such thingsqualifiedher
art-nothing qualifies
,her life as the
material of tragedy. It has been hard
fornovelistsordramatiststo
canonizetheperformingartist.Sarah
Belrnhardt i,spired
Proust
and
Henry Jalnles; 'Colettedrew son her
own fascinating life; Sartr'e worked
hardatKeaa.Butwhateverthese
triumphs were lbetween covers, t.lley
have
never
giveh
great
actresses
.great roles. The performing artist is
a complexmechanism,.and
in the
most powerful of them the urge for
self-exposure, the shame of an inadequate performance-even
tlhe con,tinual racking desire t o b e rid, once
and for all, of the very desire Do risk
such 'hazard-often exist in an almost
1~toler:abde #balance.Marilyn Monroe

"

'

A ~ ~ U25,
S E1962

was used in her

own lifetimeas the
basis of a shoddycommercial film
whichfailed,
among ot,her reasons,
for its superficiality. T h e resemblance
was duly publ~cized 'but
n o one really belleved' it or cared. The Goddess,
clheap as it Was in c'onceptJion and
execution, may well-beoome a monument 'of tasteandtalentcompa,red
to the doulbtless i n e v i t d e Marily?~
i l l o w o e S t o ~ y ,staming 'mme as yet
unbornreplica of th,ebestfeatures
of Jeanne Eagels, Jean
Harlow,
CaroleLombard,BetteDavis
a,nd
Greta Garbo, with a supporting cast
of Joe IhMagglo,. Jr., wllen he gets
out of the Marines, and Clark Gable,
Jr.,when he gets .out of the cradle.
But let us assumethat one day
Marilyn Monroe's story will find that
poetic dramacist who scan capture its
tragedy-not
asNorma JeanMortenson turned into Marilyn Monroe,
n'ot as M.M., but rather as the Performin,g Artist in #our country, in our
time. Such a dramatist, reading MauriceZolotow's
admirablebiography
(Harcourt,Brace;
1960), will see
that
the
denouement
is indicated
flfom the
first
chapter.
Zolotaw's
study, wh,ieh comes up to The Misfits amndher dea&,' is courteous, humaneandextremelyperceptive.
In
it,
only
Msonaoe',s wisecracks
are
funny. It is a b'ook thatcanserve
someone as North's Phtarclt served
Shakespeare:
everything
there
is
savethe
choice .of scene andthe
grandeur of words.
Lacking a Shakespeare, who often
breathedimmortalityintofar
less
absorbing originals, w,e shall
look
longforsomeone t o encompassher
griefs. Her playwright-husband eav,e
her her most serious script, and If it
was a flawed masterpiece it is still a
masterpiece. But The Mi~fitr,unlike her other films, is not essentially
about her perfornlanc'e, or about an
artist performi'ng. It is about the almostpornographichorror
,oI a famous man who is actually dying and
a falmous womanwho is having a
nervousbreakdown.ArthurMiller
knew her as ,110 'one else: "If she was
simple it would have beeneasy t o
helpher.
She could havemad,e it
with 'a lirttle luck, S h e needed a blessing." Had she enjoyed that blessing,
she certainly codd have playedmagnific,enndy Doll Tearsheelt, Katharine
&e Shrew,Mistcess
Page, Portia.

And If she had been granted anotlier

chance,inanother
life, lin another
society or d t u r e , shecouldhave
played
Cleopatra-not
Shaw's
kitten-queen, (but the Alexandrian princess, the serpent of told Nile. Yet, in
our time, who could havee,ncomspassed her chalracter? Tenn,essee Williams
naturalllysprings t o mind, (since h e
knows ourmovie ilndustry well and
has what passes for passion and compassion; but judging by his last two
andpossiblybestplays,
Ais Ia,rgest
glfts are for comedy. H e writes comedies of manners,
more
mannerist
than tragic. Brecht might have made
a cartoon, but Msonroe was not grim; '
O'NeilI wasalmosthumorless;
neitherhadthe
innocence and gaiety
which assert Monroe's aura.

HOWEVER, thmere i,s 'one playwright,

and evidence has just come to light

that he is far more "modern" than
many now living in the flesh. Oscar
Wildemighthavetriumphedwith
Mardyn Monroe's material,since i t
was so much like his (own. When the
rhousalnd and m'ore pages of his collected letters appear here in the fall,
so magnificently,presentedandannotated by M r . Rupert Hart-Davis,
we .shall enjoy not only one of the
greatest ,of English4 auto'biographies;
we shallalsolearn to know, for the
first time, a marvelously f~u~nny,~
generous,profoundlydecent
mab, who
in his whole short life (.hedied a t
f,orty-six) never harmed a living soul,
save himfself, the wife he adored and
thme twoveryyoungchildren
who
meantmoretohimthana,nything
In the world. His personal 6ragedy is
certainly one of the most terrible and
m o v h g a,boutwhich
we have ab- ,
solutelyoompleteinfonmation..And
he wasa performing artist in-his public as wdl as in his private life.
M'onroe was a woman of considerable
itmportance
andWildewould
'have
known,
as few others, just
wherein her importame lay. She belongs in the fairly large company of .
tragedians in life who also performed '
f'or money in a bzoader theatre. Not
all of them were stage actors, and in
the cases of Oscar Wilde and Marilyn M-onroe,s,ome of t h e k greatelst
scenes were not played on stage. Like
Wilde,sheoftenreservedhertident
for her art and her geniusfor her life. ,
T h e essence of tlhe s t a r penform-

2%

ers individual cont!ribution is the

development of atone,styleand
rhythm which make legible hisprivatemorality.Theintensity
of the
distillation has aninflamlmatory effect on the whole wodd, high-b,row,
low-brow andmiddleibrow,because
it seems a revelation, atleast
in
part, of theirowndivineor
mon-.
strous qualities. T h e genius-performer, wlhose compelling, orcompulsive, problem is theediting of a
private iilentity into an intoxicating
icon, hasalongline
of saintsand
martyrs: Beckford,
Byron,
Kean,
Baudelaire,Booth,Rimbaud,van
Gogh, T.E. Lawrence, Nijinsky, DyIan Thomas, James Dean, Jean Harlow and
her
legitimate
daughter,
Marilyn Mon-roe. Th,e
seupendous
question: Who am I, really?-unl e v it is auswered to #on,esown satisfaction ataboutthe
age when one
achievels an end of tecbnical apprenticeship - generates au endless
sepsatv energy of frusnrati,on disguised
as bjlliant nelyous energy, which is
no less pvedictably fatal thsn cancer.
By no means all great performers are
martyrs,thoughsomeapproachthe
saintly. Many of the {best have had
thf: power to solvetheir own questions of identity, and have heard the
lovely music a t &e end. Qne thinks
of Garrick at home; Walt Whitmali,
the arch-impersonator, receiving Oscar Wild,e in Camden;SirHenry
Irving and Ellen Terry; Vi&or Hmugo,
whom Cocteau said wasa,madman
who thoughthe wasVictorHugo;
Duse, Payloya, and #Cocteau nimself,
who has played the valrious dkguises
af Harlequin for seventy years, survivillg all ,the spiritual and physical
exercises that are credired with killing sq many of his juniors.
T h e heatlthy, the wholesome
performers, as opposed to the cornpulsive ,ones, )have$been able t o balance or employ their compelling behavior in publisc, usuallysupported
by a techniqueandat-radition
of
craft. And in the old days, no matter
hqw horrifying
*heir
infalncies or
adolescences, performers could almost
cail their souls th,eir own. Edmund
Eean, theb greatest Shakespeareanof
his time, had no ealsler a human apprenticeship than M d y n Monlroe;
psychicshocks drom his youth certainly killed him sooner than if he
had been a nobleman and rich ;(in

F2

whichcase he could {not haye been

an actor a t all) ,,But Kean, in spite
of his hysterlcalbehavior,hadthe
finalsatisfaction of appearing in a
great
repertory.
He $mself contorolled evely element of its production,presentationas
welI as exploitation. H1s reputabon and,body belonged t o himself t o do vi& as he
pleased, and he pleased to drink:
However, be was \not bo& president
andpartner of EdmundKean Pnoductions,Inc., a corporation manipulated by a cartel of hopeful wolves,
who weretreacheious
.always, and
who could yet howl about their propertys
final,
d,esperate,
treachery.
Thele ?vas publicity-seeking
in
Keaus day and probably in Shakespeares too. But in
Shakespeares
time, repertory troupes welre pratected by 1roya.l patent or noble patrons,
and th,e actom wore their responsible
Now we have n o
masterslively.
repertory comtpanies, except in a few
intelstitialorputativeinstitutions,
andit is highlyunlikely thatthey
will ever again dolninate our theatre.
Our only truecepertory h,ouses are
thechains of ,smallart-fdmhouses,
where B1w Stop, The Blood of the
Poet, Ten D a y s , That Shook The
W O I - ~Some
?,
Like I t Hot and %he
Misfits, \ d l be shown for ge(nerati0n.s.

dancer; -the actor has n o such luck;

c o u p e i t is true bhat Nijinsky
went mad, that Callas behaves badly(orastutely),andthat
Dyhn
Thomas wrote very good verse, read
itvery well anddranktoomuch.
But the peatest pelrformers of iristltutional theatre, smgers, dancers and
those actor-managers of the last ce,ntury, by an8d largeprovidea
picture of almost bourgeois
domestic
smplicity. That is also true of many
excellent film actors who have come
to their own satisfaction with a becoming
,modesty:
James
Caginey,
Gary Cooper, B L WLancaster,
~
Katherine Hepburn and ]many others. But
these are me character actors, which
is dlfferentfrom
a blazing star:a
Garbo, who does n o t die, exceptto
the screen; a Marilyn Monroe.
Hollywoodhas alwaysbeen a sup r m a r k e t of personality. As in most
supermarkets,the comestiblescome
packed with additives, preservatives,
detelgents; and while not immediatelylethal,suchnourishmenthasnt
the savor that nature intended. Very
llttle h a s issued from
Hollywood
that .has any claim on Jthemost translentmemory.Naturallythere
is in
Holdywood n o lmuseum devoted t o
the motion picture; i t is a phenomenon without a real history, isn which
only the freaks,the exceptions, the
T h e ,one
CERTAIlNLY, Marijyn Monroe was tragediesare~memora~ble.
vlctimized, )but one must study Mau- academy i t ,eversanctioned is suitrice ZoJltotows book t o understand ably enough an annualracket. It 3s
less chancefor
the crafty uses she (made of her own aclimateproviding
healthy
work
than
even
downtown
adversity, and the legends she helpLos
Angeles,
for
all
its
smog.
But its
ed augment as weapon, protection
and blackmad. We all know how ju- .not the onlyvillain; RolJywood has
Its conscious
and
unconscious
acveniledelinqu,entsfeedbackquite
adequately Freudian jalrgoa t o their compllces.
interrogaxors, whd then check off the
predictable causes:gullt,rejection,
IT doesnt heIp the
pedorming
ahenation, insecurity, etc. Lackmg a
arts much that Harvara
Univecrslty,
Shakespeare, it would take a Bernard havmg some decades ago exiled
Shavrr-~vl~o unde~rstoodT.E. Law- George.Pierce Balrer t o teach a t
renceas Pvt. Shav, Ross, the Bas- Yale, finallyerectedafantastically
tard,thePoet,theAdventurer,the
equipped&eatrewiththeproviso
Failure, the Success-to utlllze d
l of thatactmg is notto be instructed
Monroes
maniacal
,procrastination, for credit, and t h a t there be no gradher treacheries to phose who ((helped uate school of drama.
The
Loeb
that wolf+pack and rat-pack,
Theatre: is thus oaly a clean play-pe,n
her
agents and instruciors, who of course for che youag ,gentl1emei It ,helps less
expected only a kmd ward for their
tohave Congressgrantaland-site
foranationalculturalcenterwith
investment.
Dance and song, unlike thespoken the proviso that the nation never be
word or t,he -use of clatssic 'diction, called upon either to erect t.he buildhave absolute techniques. Ylrtuosity
ing or maintain, it.
It helps least of
is the salvation of Ithe. sidger and all that the Kennedy Adlmln;stration,

Of

after a canny survey, has discovered

no pollticalmileageincuIture,and
is- cloaking .that bit of inteliigence
with tasteful interest io interim
decoratiw, .good cooking and polite literary conversation. Sure, lots of cult i r e centers are going u p aI1 over
the country. If one wants a fair idea
ol what happens when they ar,e built,
regald the situatioll in Seattle, which
thanks to the planners of a successfu l WorldJs Fairhas
an excelIent
facillty.There 1s ad og-f~gl ~t as t o
how the builldings will be used; and
there is no plan for any future
use,
esceptthepiouspromisethat
expensive
cultural
events
should
be
prudently pruned.

France. Marilyn Monroe just played

rightaround
I t . Heractwas
fant a s m , uproariousanddaft.
Not t h e
least lronlc part of a llfe so crammed
with m n y was thatsomeonemade
SO dependent on the shaky therapies
of contemporary post-FFeudianphilosopliyshouldhaveportrayedto
the public the very picture of bumptious sexual normalcy.

A HOLLYWOOD gossipcolumnist,

who shouldknow
If anyone does,
s a d that Marilyn Monroes life was
a n absolute waste; one wonders what
he, in the blief watches of the night,
thinks of what he does with his time.
Radio Vaticail
proclaimed
that
a
personshouldhavethecourageto
~ A R I L Y N MONROE was sull- face life without turning to the easy
posed t o bme theSexGoddess,
but way out of suicide. It (seems to have
somehow no one, including, or iadeed been a relatively dif,ficult way f,or a
first of all, herself,ever believed it. 7~70manwho tried it sorne half-dozen
Rather, .she was a comedienne i m - times without success. Marilyn MonScience and
personatiyzg the ,American ideaof the roe turned to Christian
a gooddaughter-inSexGoddess, justasshe
impelrson- let herself,as
ated
Hildegarde,
the
c~hantoosie,y law, beinstructedintheReformed
in Bzu Stop. When people paid nheir Jewilsh faith. There is ,evidence that
forty miIlions t o see Monroe, i t was she
believed
in
divine
providence,
foranaestheticperformance,not
a but Its councilors on earth have not
proceeded far enough in the ecumensimple
provocation.
And
she,
perhaps even consciously, e ~ e m ~ p l ~ f iae d ical movement to help miserable performing artists wllose God-given talphllosophywhichhadcome
toher
pragmaticalIy,andwhich
a lot OF ents blring them more burdens than
their God-given
flesh
can
bear.
American
women
dont
hke
very
More than predictably, the fdhiest
much-a
philosophy
at
once
hefootnote
appeared
in Tilnes anodonlstic,full of uncommoncommon
Recapping
,every
detail
sense, and, even to some in~ellectuals, nymity.
deeply disturbing. Her perEoirmances w h ~ c hcould .exude a faiatly pornorollindicated that whilesex i:s certainly graphic whiff, its final diapason
ed: AP the same she was a star; it
fun, andoftenfunny, I t IS onlyone
of nlany games. Otlhers include t he hardlymatters ,she neverqulte became an actress. G e t t h a t quite.
use of the intelligence.Sexhasa
Malilyn Monroes
life
was not a
certain importance, indubitably, -but
She wasa
th e messianic role w,hich has been as- waste.Shegavedelight.
signed I t in thefirst
half of the c~riterion#ofthe conlic in a rather sad
world. Her films
will
continueto
twentiethcentury
may havebeen
overplayed,just
as it was under- give delight; and it is btlasphemny t o
no use. Herexample,
played in the second haIf of the nine- sayshehad
teenthcentury.
It seems to have our waste of her, has the use of a
redemption in arti,stsyetuntrained
beenplayedaboutrightinGreece,
andunbow.
Rome, Japaa and eighteenthcentury
1

Letters
(Contzlnred f r o m inside f j o n t cover)

Professor Hughes 1s runnmg on n

peace program of American initiatives to
end the arms race while also advocating
a liberal domestic program. [See book
revlew; page 761
A large vote for Hughes in November can be important in proving that the
peace issue 1s politically viable in Massachusetts and across the country. We
hope t h a t interested citizens throughout
the U S. ~ 1 1 1make financial contributions to t h e attention of the undersigned,
care of Hughes for Senate Committee,
56 Boylston Street, Canlbrldge 38, Massachusetts.
JEROME GROSSMAN,
Secletary
Bo~to17,Mass.
,I

WO~
I

6uEtras at

Dear Sirs: Reading The

Ultras

was

like seeingall my own fears in print.

In my community, a mem,ber of the
Radlcal Right was vuccessful In winnrng
a sent on the School Board. Inside of
t w o weekshe had attacked- psychologicaI testing; T h e Natzolr.; The Saturday
Review; Science Research Associates:
Langston Hughes; the Overstreets.
Psychologlcal testing, In our dlstrict,
was suspended pending a policy decision
by the board.
We do have in our community some
aware parents with the guts to try to
preserve the rights of our chddren t o be
educated and not indoctrmated. Whether we will have any effect on this appalent move toward reaction and its
resulting loss of liberties rem.ains to Lie
seen. Any suggestion you or your readers might have will be gratefully received.
EVELYNSILVER
Hiclzsvdle, N.Y.

Waste in Washington
D e a r Sirs. Your edltorial in the July 28
issue [A Scent on the Wind] was
very encouraglng to me. It is good to

know that my concern aboutthe gross

waste in government procurement is
shared by many people throughoutthe
country, and your editorial will make
many more people cognizant of this
situation. It is my sincere hope that the
publcwill soon become so aroused about
this sulbject that it will insist that legdation be (passed to stop these practices.
I am enclosing a copy of your editorial as i t appeared in the Coqzgresrional
R ecoq d .
EARLWILSON,M.C. (9th Dist., Ind.)
Washington,
D.C.
.
.
.
-

r123