Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The National Statistics Office certified that Dinagat Islands population is 120,813.
Its land area is 802.12 square kilometers and its average annual income is
P82,696,433.23, as certified by the Bureau of Local Government Finance. On
October 2, 2006, the President approved into law R.A. 9355 creating the
Province of Dinagat Islands. On December 3, 2006, the COMELEC conducted
the mandatory plebiscite for the ratification of the creation of the province under
the LGC which yielded 69,943 affirmative votes and 63,502 negative votes. With
the approval of the people from both the mother province of Surigao del Norte
and the Province of Dinagat Islands (Dinagat), the President appointed the
interim set of provincial officials who took their oath of office on January 26, 2007.
Later, during the May 14, 2007 synchronized elections, the Dinagatnons elected
their new set of provincial officials who assumed office on July 1, 2007.
Yes. In Navarro vs. Executive Secretary (G.R. no. 180050, April 12, 2011), the
Honorable Supreme Court ruled that Republic Act No. 9355 is as VALID and
CONSTITUTIONAL, and the proclamation of the Province of Dinagat Islands and
the election of the officials thereof are declared VALID.
The SC also ruled that the provision in Article 9(2) of the Rules and Regulations
Implementing the Local Government Code of 1991 stating, The land area
requirement shall not apply where the proposed province is composed of one (1)
or more islands, is declared VALID.
But it must be pointed out that when the local government unit to be created
consists of one (1) or more islands, it is exempt from the land area requirement
as expressly provided in Section 442 and Section 450 of the LGC if the local
government unit to be created is a municipality or a component city, respectively.
This exemption is absent in the enumeration of the requisites for the creation of a
province under Section 461 of the LGC, although it is expressly stated under
Article 9(2) of the LGC-IRR.
xxx There appears neither rhyme nor reason why this exemption
should apply to cities and municipalities, but not to provinces. In fact, considering
the physical configuration of the Philippine archipelago, there is a greater
likelihood that islands or group of islands would form part of the land area of a
newly-created province than in most cities or municipalities. It is, therefore,
logical to infer that the genuine legislative policy decision was expressed in
Section 442 (for municipalities) and Section 450 (for component cities) of the
LGC, but was inadvertently omitted in Section 461 (for provinces). Thus, when
the exemption was expressly provided in Article 9(2) of the LGC-IRR, the
inclusion was intended to correct the congressional oversight in Section 461 of
the LGC and to reflect the true legislative intent. It would, then, be in order for