Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Week 1
1: Cash is the most important of the three assets. While accounts receivable and
inventory are also important everything boils down to liquidity; the organizations
ability to quickly access cash resources or turn assets into cash in order to support
such functions as purchasing inventory and maintaining operations.
I would think that each is susceptible to error; a simply put explanation: human
error, people make mistakes, overlook things, etc. In terms of fraud, I think that
receivables would be the most susceptible to fraudulent activity. Consumers
nowadays tend to try to get something for nothing and in such a process they
attempt to rip off businesses through counterfeit cash, stolen credit cards, fake
checks, etc.
A misstatement could adversely affect each asset, whether it be to overstate or
understate. To overstate cash funds could cause paychecks to bounce, just to name
one affect it would have. To understate cash funds could mean a decision to pass up
an opportunity because it is believed that you do not have the funds (when in fact
you do). To overstate receivables would be to overstate cash, make checks bounce,
and Im sure many other things happen. To overstate inventory, you may not be
able to fulfill all of your orders and that in itself could cause a lot of issues and extra
work to correct.
Liquidity can be measured through a metric of an organizations working capital.
Working capital is defined as current assets minus current liabilities. A positive
position means that a company is able to support its operations (including
purchasing inventory).
One of the metrics shortcomings, however, is that current assets often cannot be
liquidated in the short term. High working capital positions often indicate that there
is too much money tied up in accounts receivable and inventory, rather than shortterm liquidity.
All organizations should focus on their level of working capital. Organizations that
improve their management of working capital are able to free up cash and thus, for
example, can reduce their dependence on outside funding or finance additional
growth projects.
2: What are the different ways to estimate bad debt? How does this affect net
income? What does generally accepted accounting principles require? Why?
Should all companies have bad debt? Explain your answer.
I actually found this bit of information to be interesting. Through the allowance
method I found two ways to estimate bad debt were either the income statement
approach or the balance sheet approach. With the examples that I reviewed it
illustrated how the balance sheet approach will base the allowance for doubtful
accounts on a percentage, that percentage is applied to the accounts receivable
balance at the end of the year. The allowance method estimates bad debt as a
percentage of sales for the period, this percentage is based on the companys past
experience, that percentage is applied to the total sales (or the total of accounts
receivable for the year).
The GAAP requires companies to use the allowance method, organizations that are
not in compliance with the GAAP may use the direct write-off method.
I dont know if all companies should have bad debt but it seems they all do
eventually because consumers just are not as honest and forthright as they should
or used to be.
2: We discussed the impact on inventory valuation under iGAAP last week. How
may iGAAP impact R&D costs? Which industry may be impacted the most?
IFRS gives management more flexibility in the area of asset valuation as a
whole, discretion that is also likely to increase company income. In the area of R&D
costs and the related area of homegrown intangible assets valuation, IFRS allows
development costs, but not basic research costs, to be included in the companys
assets and, therefore, not expensed against income. U.S. GAAP insists that all
research and development costs are expensed, except in extremely limited
industry-specific circumstances. I was not able to find any other facets affected by
the convergence, nor was I able to find which industry would be most greatly
impacted by converging. Would you be able to provide that information or advise
where it is located? Thank you!
3: What is the purpose of depreciation? Does the book value of a fixed asset (cost
minus accumulated depreciation) communicate to a user what the asset is worth?
Explain why or why not. Should the financial statements reflect the market value of
fixed assets? Explain why or why not?
The purpose of depreciation is to match the cost of a productive asset (that has a
useful life of more than a year) to the revenues earned from using the asset. Since it
is hard to see a direct link to revenues, the asset's cost is usually allocated to the
years in which the asset is used. No, the book value is simply the purchase price of
the asset minus the accumulated depreciation of the asset. Book value does not
measure the "utility" value of the asset. Book value does not accurately reflect the
market value of an asset is because the depreciation expense of an asset is merely
an estimate. Once an asset has been fully depreciated the book value is zero unless
a salvage value was initially calculated.
4: Kevin, you bring up an important point. What should the company do in year
three and they decide the asset has only a 7 year life?
5: I don't remember is someone has mentioned this already of not, but does iGAAP
allow a business to reflect the market value of an asset on their balance sheet?
6: Thao and class, do you think that adjusting the fixed asset value each may lead
to income statement manipulation?
7: Juan, I could envision a third party valuation system to make the valuation more
objective, but even then I could see some valuation companies being more
conservative than others and once that is identified, a company could use that
knowledge to select a certain tendency depending on how they wanted the
valuation to lean in a particular year
8: Michelle, do you think the added expense of estimating the market value of each
asset would be of that much value for the stakeholders? If so, would you suggest
that the company perform this annually or quarterly, or only on specific fixed
assets?
For the lessor, a guaranteed residual value is part of the residual value guaranteed
by the lessee. The un-guaranteed residual value is the portion of the residual value
of the leased asset; where the realization of it is not assured by the lessor, nor
guaranteed to the lessor by any party.
In the lessees perspective, having a guaranteed residual value would affect the
calculations of the minimum lease payment, whereas and un-guaranteed residual
value would not.
In the lessors perspective it would make no difference if the residual value is
guarantee or un-guaranteed once the lease rate is determined.