You are on page 1of 2

Federal Register / Vol. 73, No.

73 / Tuesday, April 15, 2008 / Notices 20249

2 10(a)(1) and 10(a)(3). The remaining Background Final Rescission of New Shipper
portions of the meeting will be open to The Department published the Reviews
the public. Preliminary Results on October 9, 2007. In the Preliminary Results, the
For more information contact Yvette On December 17, 2007, the petitioners1, Department preliminarily rescinded the
Springer on (202) 482–2813. Xuzhou Jinjiang Foodstuffs Co., Ltd. new shipper reviews of Anhui Tongxin
Dated: April 9, 2008. (Xuzhou), Washington International Aquatic Product & Food Co., Ltd.
Yvette Springer,
Insurance Co. (WII), the surety company (Anhui), Huoshan New Three–Gold
for the U.S. importer of Xuzhou’s Food Trade Co., Ltd. (Huoshan), and
Committee Liaison Officer.
subject merchandise, and Jingdezhen Jingdezhen because it found the
[FR Doc. E8–7909 Filed 4–14–08; 8:45 am] Garay Foods Co., Ltd (Jingdezhen) companies’ sales were not bona fide.
BILLING CODE 3510–JT–P submitted case briefs. On December 26, See Preliminary Results; see also,
2007, Xiping Opeck Food Co., Ltd. separate memoranda for each of these
(Xiping Opeck), and the petitioners companies to Stephen J. Claeys, Deputy
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE submitted rebuttal briefs. On February Assistant Secretary For Import
International Trade Administration 22, 2008, WII and Xuzhou submitted Administration from Abdelali
comments in response to a Elouaradia, Director, Office 4 Import
memorandum the Department placed on Administration, regarding Bona Fide
(A–570–848) the record regarding Xuzhou’s Sales Analysis and Intent to Rescind the
shipments to the United States. See Review (dated October 1, 2007).
Freshwater Crawfish Tail Meat From
Memorandum from Jeff Pedersen to the We received comments with respect
the People’s Republic of China: Final
File regarding ‘‘Information Obtained to our preliminary decision to rescind
Results and Partial Rescission of the
from the Food and Drug Administration the new shipper review for Jingdezhen.
2005–2006 Antidumping Duty
Regarding Shipments by Xuzhou The Department continues to find sales
Administrative Review and Rescission
Jinjiang Foodstuffs Co., Ltd.,’’ dated by Anhui, Huoshan, and Jingdezhen to
of 2005–2006 New Shipper Reviews February 7, 2008. be non–bona fide. See Comment 2 of the
On February 1, 2008, the Department ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for
AGENCY: Import Administration,
extended the time period for completion the Final Results and Partial Rescission
International Trade Administration,
of the final results until April 7, 2008. of the 2005–2006 Antidumping Duty
Department of Commerce.
See Freshwater Crawfish Tail Meat Administrative Review and Rescission
EFFECTIVE DATE: April 15, 2008. From the People’s Republic of China: of 2005–2006 New Shipper Reviews’’
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce Notice of Extension of Time Limit for (Issues and Decision Memorandum)
(the Department) is conducting an the Final Results of the 2005–2006 accompanying this notice for a detailed
administrative review and new shipper Antidumping Duty Administrative discussion of our decision with respect
reviews of the antidumping duty order Review and 2005–2006 New Shipper to Jingdezhen. Because these companies
on freshwater crawfish tail meat Reviews, 73 FR 6127 (February 1, 2008). had no reviewable sales during the POR,
(crawfish) from the People’s Republic of Scope of the Order the Department is rescinding these new
China (PRC). The period of review shipper reviews. See 19 CFR
The product covered by this
(POR) is September 1, 2005, through 351.213(d)(3); see also, Tianjin
antidumping duty order is freshwater
August 31, 2006. The Department crawfish tail meat, in all its forms Tiancheng Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. v.
published the preliminary results of (whether washed or with fat on, United States, 366 F. Supp. 2d 1246,
these reviews on October 9, 2007. See whether purged or unpurged), grades, 1263 (CIT 2005) (the Court of
Freshwater Crawfish Tail Meat From the and sizes; whether frozen, fresh, or International Trade affirmed that
People’s Republic of China: Preliminary chilled; and regardless of how it is Commerce may exclude sales from the
Results and Partial Rescission of the packed, preserved, or prepared. export price calculation where it finds
2005–2006 Antidumping Duty Excluded from the scope of the order are the sales are not bona fide. In the case
Administrative Review and Preliminary live crawfish and other whole crawfish, of new shipper reviews involving only
Intent to Rescind 2005–2006 New whether boiled, frozen, fresh, or chilled. one sale, exclusion of the new shipper
Shipper Reviews, 72 FR 57288 (October Also excluded are saltwater crawfish of sale as being non–bona fide must
9, 2007) (Preliminary Results). We any type, and parts thereof. Freshwater necessarily end the review).
invited interested parties to comment on crawfish tail meat is currently
the Preliminary Results. After reviewing Final Partial Rescission of
classifiable in the Harmonized Tariff Administrative Review
interested parties’ comments, we made Schedule of the United States (HTSUS)
no changes to our calculations for the In the Preliminary Results, the
under item numbers 1605.40.10.10 and
final results of review. The final Department preliminarily rescinded the
1605.40.10.90, which are the new
dumping margins for this review are administrative review of Yancheng Hi–
HTSUS numbers for prepared
listed in the ‘‘Final Results of Review’’ King Agriculture Developing Co., Ltd.
foodstuffs, indicating peeled crawfish
section below. (Yancheng), which reported no
tail meat and other, as introduced by
shipments, and Anhui, whose single
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: CBP in 2000, and HTSUS numbers
sale, which was covered by both the
Melissa Blackledge or Jeff Pedersen; AD/ 0306.19.00.10 and 0306.29.00.00, which
new shipper review and administrative
CVD Operations, Office 4, Import are reserved for fish and crustaceans in
review, the Department found to be
Administration, International Trade general. The HTSUS subheadings are
non–bona fide. Interested parties did
Administration, U.S. Department of provided for convenience and customs
not comment on these preliminary
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution purposes only. The written description
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES

rescissions. For the reasons stated in the


Ave., N.W., Washington, DC 20230; of the scope of this order is dispositive.
Preliminary Results, we are rescinding
telephone: (202) 482–3518 or (202) 482–
the administrative review with respect
2769, respectively. 1 The petitioners are the Crawfish Processors

Alliance, the Louisiana Department of Agriculture to Yancheng and Anhui. See 19 CFR
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: and Forestry, and Bob Odom, Commissioner. 351.213(d)(3).

VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:31 Apr 14, 2008 Jkt 214001 PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\15APN1.SGM 15APN1
20250 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 73 / Tuesday, April 15, 2008 / Notices

Adverse Facts Available publication of this notice of final results Dated: April 7, 2008.
In the Preliminary Results, the of administrative review for all David M. Spooner,
Department found that Xuzhou failed to shipments of crawfish from the PRC Assistant Secretary for Import
report all of its U.S. sales of subject entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, Administration.
merchandise, and thus it was for consumption on or after the date of Appendix – List of Issues
appropriate to base the company’s publication, as provided by section
751(a)(1) of the Act: (1) for Xiping Comment 1: Whether the Department
dumping margin on total adverse facts
Opeck and Xuxhou, which each have Should Assign a Combination Rate to
available. For these final results, the
separate rates, the cash deposit rate will Xiping Opeck
Department continues to find that it is
Comment 2: Whether Jingdezhen’s Sale
appropriate to base Xuzhou’s dumping be the company–specific rate shown
was Bona Fide
margin on total adverse facts available. above; (2) for previously reviewed or
Comment 3: Whether Xuzhou’s
See the accompanying Issues and investigated companies not listed above Dumping Margin Should be Based on
Decision Memorandum at Comment 3. that have a separate rate, the cash Total Adverse Facts Available
Analysis of Comments Received deposit rate will continue to be the A. Unreported POR Sales of Subject
company–specific rate published for the Merchandise
All issues raised in the case briefs are most recent period; (3) the cash deposit
addressed in the Issues and Decision rate for all other PRC exporters will be
Memorandum, which is hereby adopted B. Application of Adverse Facts
223.01 percent, the current PRC–wide Available
by this notice. A list of the issues which
rate; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all
parties raised and to which we
non–PRC exporters will be the rate C. The Appropriate AFA Rate
responded in the Issues and Decision
applicable to the PRC exporter that Comment 4: Whether the Department
Memorandum is attached to this notice
as an appendix. The Issues and Decision supplied that exporter. These cash Should have Accepted New Factual
Memorandum is a public document deposit requirements shall remain in Information Submitted by Washington
which is on file in the Central Records effect until further notice. International Insurance Company
Unit in room 1117 in the main Comment 5: Whether Certain Factual
Notification of Interested Parties Information Should be Removed from
Department building, and is accessible
on the Web at http:// This notice also serves as a final the Record
www.ia.ita.doc.gov/frn. The paper copy reminder to importers of their [FR Doc. E8–8046 Filed 4–14–08; 8:45 am]
and electronic version of the responsibility under 19 CFR BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S

memorandum are identical in content. 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate


Changes Since the Preliminary Results regarding the reimbursement of
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
antidumping duties prior to liquidation
There have been no changes since the of the relevant entries during this
International Trade Administration
Preliminary Results. review period. Failure to comply with
[A–570–933]
Final Results of Review this requirement could result in the
We determine that the following Secretary’s presumption that Frontseating Service Valves From the
percentage margins exist for the period reimbursement of the antidumping People’s Republic of China: Initiation
September 1, 2005, through August 31, duties occurred and the subsequent of Antidumping Duty Investigation
2006: assessment of double antidumping
duties. AGENCY: Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
FRESHWATER CRAWFISH TAIL MEAT This notice also serves as a reminder Department of Commerce.
FROM THE PRC to parties subject to administrative
EFFECTIVE DATE: April 15, 2008.
protective orders (APOs) of their
Weighted– responsibility concerning the return or FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Average Hallie N. Zink, AD/CVD Operations,
Manufacturer/Exporter Margin destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance China/NME Group, SEC Office, Import
(Percent)
with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues Administration, International Trade
Xiping Opeck Food Co., Ltd ....... 13.61 to govern business proprietary Administration, U.S. Department of
Xuzhou Jinjiang Foodstuffs Co., Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
information in this segment of the
Ltd. .......................................... 223.01 Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230;
proceeding. Timely written notification
PRC–wide Rate .......................... 223.01 telephone: 202–482–6907.
of the return/destruction of APO
materials or conversion to judicial Initiation of Investigation
Assessment Rates
protective order is hereby requested. The Petition
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b), the Failure to comply with the regulations
Department will determine, and U.S. and terms of an APO is a violation On March 19, 2008, the Department of
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) Commerce (‘‘Department’’) received a
which is subject to sanction.
shall assess, antidumping duties on all petition concerning imports of
appropriate entries. The Department We are issuing and publishing this frontseating service valves (‘‘FSVs’’)
intends to issue assessment instructions determination and notice in accordance from the People’s Republic of China
to CBP 15 days after the date of with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of (‘‘PRC’’), filed in proper form by Parker-
publication of these final results of the Act. Hannifin Corporation (‘‘Petitioner’’). See
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES

review. Petition for the Imposition of


Antidumping Duties on Frontseating
Cash Deposit Requirements Service Valves, filed March 19, 2008
The following cash deposit (‘‘Petition’’). On March 25, 2008, the
requirements will be effective upon Department issued a request for

VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:31 Apr 14, 2008 Jkt 214001 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\15APN1.SGM 15APN1

You might also like