TEN LANDMARKS TOWARD NEXT GENERATION KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT

by : Md Santo – http://mobeeknowledge.ning.com

1. CONFIRMING RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN BLOOM’S TAXONOMY OF LEARNING WITH KNOWLEDGE

AND KM
Bloom's Taxonomy (Learning Domains) for the first time (?) correlated directly with Knowledge and
Knowledge Management (KM) to make us having more insight on relation among the process of
Learning, level of Consciousness and components of KM . One among others seems related with terms
used by Nancy Dixon’s work (http://www.nancydixonblog.com/ ) in which K with Lower
Consciousness ~ KM Tools ~ matching with Leveraging Explicit Knowledge, K with Medium Consciousness
~ KM Process Frameworks ~ matching with Leveraging Experiential Knowledge and K with Higher
Consciousness ~ KM Standards ~ matching with Leveraging Collective Knowledge respectively (
http://mobeeknowledge.ning.com/forum/topics/blooms-taxonomy-knowledge-and - BLOOM’S
TAXONOMY, KNOWLEDGE AND KM REVISITED : SHOULD DIKW MODEL TRANSFORMED INTO DI-KW
MODEL? )

2. DISCOVERING KNOWLEDGE IN UNIVERSE CONTINUUM TO VALIDATE THE EPISTEMOLOGY OF

NEXT GEN KM
Putting Knowledge in Physics – Knowledge Continuum within Universe Continuum to confirm the
epistemology of the next gen KM ( http://mobeeknowledge.ning.com/forum/topics/the-function-of -
THE FUNCTION OF PHYSICS-KNOWLEDGE CONTINUUM IN PERSONAL KM AND BIG KM )

3. KNOWLEDGE EVOLVED INSIDE HUMAN BEING HAVING CONSCIOUSNESS CONSIDERED AS NEW

PARADIGM
Knowledge is evolved as emergent behavior within human body as complex system, having
consciousness and free will (mind and value) as well as behaving dynamically as Subject –
(http://mobeeknowledge.ning.com/forum/topics/we-are-the-knowledge-hybrid - WE ARE THE
KNOWLEDGE : HYBRID DEFINITION OF KNOWLEDGE )

4. IN RACE WITH TECHNOLOGY HUMAN BEING MAKING GREAT TURNING FROM MIND BRAIN TO
CONSCIOUSNESS DNA
Short description through a provoked statement written as follow : ….“After Singularity between
Human Mind and Technology reaching its peak (in 2012 ?), it will be the “Jump Time” for us to make

1
 “Great Turning” from the BRAIN as locus of Mind to theDNA as locus of Consciousness and Value” …. -
http://mobeeknowledge.ning.com/forum/topics/knowledge-towards-2012-great - KNOWLEDGE
TOWARDS 2012 : GREAT TURNING FROM MIND BRAIN TO CONSCIOUSNESS DNA

5. HIGHLIGHTING 3 DISTINCTIVE TYPES OF UNIVERSE TO GET MORE INSIGHT ON THE DOMAIN OF

KM
Regarding the domain of Knowledge as well as Knowledge Management (KM), our Universe should be
emphasized comprising of 3 (three) distinctive kind of Universes namely : Physical Universe, Inner
Universe and Divine Universe (http://mobeeknowledge.ning.com/forum/topics/clarifying-the-domain-
of - CLARIFYING THE DOMAIN OF SCIENCE AND KNOWLEDGE

6. DIKW MODEL UNDERGOES TRANSFORMATION TOWARD DI – KW MODEL AS HUMAN

ENLIGHTENMENT AGENT
We definitely separated DIKW (stand for Data Information Knowledge Wisdom) model into DI – KW
model to underline that DI is non living and KW is living Human Enlightenment Agent (HEA). This will
encourage us to re-define KM ( http://delicious.com/mobeeknowledge/kmdefinition - Mobee
Knowledge CoP in Knowledge Management's kmdefinition Bookmarks ) as well as to develop
Knowledge system towards next gen KM driven by HUMAN SYSTEM BIOLOGY (HSB)-BASED KM 2.0 MAP
TEMPLATE (http://mobeeknowledge.ning.com/forum/topics/the-origin-of-knowledge-and-km - THE
ORIGIN OF KNOWLEDGE AND KM : DI-KW SEPARATED ENTITIES MODEL )

7. OUR HUMAN SYSTEM BIOLOGY (HSB)-BASED KM 2.0 TEMPLATE IS VISUAL KNOWLEDGE

INFRASTRUCTURE MAP
We’re pioneering the “Back to Nature” spirit in K (KM) mapping by developing Web-based KM 2.0 Map
template that driven by Human System Biology (HSB). This map basically is a visual map functioning to
give means as (quoted from http://ti nyurl.com/yd8jk9w ) : “Visual connection between data by series
of shapes – Visual compilation of Knowledge as conceptual model – Functioning as navigational aids".
Generated from DI-KW separated entities model ( visit :
http://mobeeknowledge.ning.com/forum/topics/the-origin-of-knowledge-and-km - THE ORIGIN OF
KNOWLEDGE AND KM : DI-KW SEPARATED ENTITIES MODEL ), our Human System Biology (HSB)-based
KM 2.0 Map actually is an “ENTERPRISE KNOWLEDGE INFRASTRUCTURE (EKI)” which is also functioned
as Corporate Knowledge Map explaining 4 (four) essential aspects of KM generated from multi
disciplinary approaches :

1. KM as an access mechanism that can be used across any management tool type : Basic
Oriented – Planned Oriented – Techno Oriented – Urgency Oriented as Management tool
type entity respectively. Social Media (SM) as an entity of management tools platform
mostly could be assumed as Techno Oriented type

2
 2. Loci of Learning Domains : Human Learning – Organizational Learning and Machine
(Technol) Learning
3. Business Plan Framework : Vision-Mission-Goals-Objectives-Strategic & Action Planning
4. Human System Biology-based KM System Development : KM Tools (Managing by Senses
indicating Peripheral Nerves System level or Lower Consciousness) – KM Process
Frameworks (Managing by Mind indicating Central Nerves System or Brain level or Medium
Consciousness) – KM Standards (Managing by Value & Culture indicating DNA level or
Higher Consciousness) . The what so called with Enterprise DNA, is division of KM
Standards comprising of Knowledge Architecture and the vital Taxonomy – Metadata
Management.
( http://mobeeknowledge.ning.com/forum/topics/human-system-biology-
hsbbased?xg_source=activity - HUMAN SYSTEM BIOLOGY (HSB)-BASED KM 2.0 MAP TEMPLATE
AND ITS USAGE )

8. FIVE BASIC IMPLICATIONS OF NEW PARADIGM OF KNOWLEDGE GIVING WIDE IMPACT ON

SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
The impact of new paradigm of Knowledge will give wide impact on the development of Science and
Technology. We positively noted at least there are 5 (five) implications on seeing the new paradigm of
Knowledge, they are namely :
1. “Knowledge is evolved, not created or captured as commonly
mentioned”.
2. ”Knowledge is central to human life, exist as the self and KM
epistemologically could be developed as the main branch of all Management tool type
studies where KM itself is an access mechanism that can be used across any
management tool type”
3. Knowledge could be put in physical spectrum as ‘atomistic or
quantumistic view of knowledge’ ranging from the most elementary particle (eg
quark) as beginning of physical reality to data – information as object to knowledge
and beyond as subject consecutively (a related article of this will be published). This
will make Knowledge matter with further implications”
4. “Scientific Knowledge (bottom up mechanism) will be
‘leveraged’ with Gnosis approach (top down mechanism) considering the emergent
property of human as Complex System into what we will coin the term
“Knowledgeable Science”. It seems in the next future, there will be “great turning” of
paradigm from “Mind Brain” (Scientific Knowledge) towards “Consciousness DNA”
(Knowledgeable Science)
5. “A highly correlated significant of analogy should exist between
the design of Human System Biology management (nature) with the ideal design of
KM System Development (nurture)”

(http://mobeeknowledge.ning.com/forum/topics/five-basic-implications-of-new - FIVE BASIC

IMPLICATIONS OF NEW PARADIGM OF KNOWLEDGE )

3
9. E – L DIVIDE IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN DIGITAL DIVIDE
Regarding the user-experience learning within global phenomenon of webification or convergence
among Web 2.0, Mobile Technology and Users-experiences, we decided to define “E-L DIVIDE” stands
for E (electronic digital ICT device aspect) and L (human side aspect in learning experience strategy) gap,
which is showing more urgent problem than DIGITAL DIVIDE issues regarding the gap within the people
in a nation, based on the assumption that dynamic of learning process will be prominently needed amid
decreasing gap in DIGITAL DIVIDE. E-Learning itself resulting of its evolution from just as multi media
technology and distance learning tools, currently becoming a normative educational platform carrying
out Social Constructivism Learning mission. We have given also the definition of “E-L DIVIDE” as follow :
“E-L DIVIDE ” refers to the gap between people with effective usage in utilizing “E” (electronic digital ICT
devices) aspect to their “L” ( human side in learning experience strategy ) aspect and those with less
effective usage “ (Md Santo, 2009) (http://mobeeknowledge.ning.com/forum/topics/suggestion-for-ict-
partnership - SUGGESTION FOR ICT PARTNERSHIP FORUM 2009 : PREVENT THE WIDENING GAP
BETWEEN e AND LEARNING FACTOR WITHIN e-LEARNING CONTEXT)

10. CLOSING THE GAP BETWEEN CAMPUS LEARNING WITH CORPORATE LEARNING
We combine two learning styles, Campus style such as SPICES Model, PRISMS Model, Credit Hours
measurement, Scoring system etc and Corporate style by using CROSS FUNCTIONAL BUSINESS PROCESS
CLASSIFICATION FRAMEWORK (PCF) adapted from APQC’s (American Productivity and Quality Center)
Process Classification Framework in PT Mobee Inc as well as PT QB Youth Inc Internship program. The
impact of such Hybrid Learning style surely will close the prominent issue at national as well as global
level on the gap problem between the Campus Learning and Corporate Learning
(http://sites.google.com/site/mobeeinternship/ - MOBEE INTERNSHIP IN COLLABRATING WITH QB
YOUTH INTERNSHIP)