You are on page 1of 2

11/12/03 23:15 FAX KINKOS SPRINGFIELD ~OO2

1 Cindy A. Cohn,Esq.(SBN 145997)


WendySeltzer,Esq.
2 ELECTRONICFRONllER FOUNDATION
454 ShotwellStreet
3 SanFrancisco,CA 94110
Telephone:(415) 436-9333xl08
4 Facsimile:(415)436-9993
5 Alan Kom, Esq. (SBN 167933)
LAW OFFICE OF ALAN KORN
6 1840 Woolsey Street
Berkeley,CA 94703
Telephone:(510) 548-7300
Facsimile:(510) 540-4821
8
Attorneysfor Plaintiff
9 01\LINE POLICY GROUP
10 JenniferStisaGranick,Esq.(SBN 168423)
ST~I\NFORD LAW SCHOOL
1 CYBERLAW CLINIC
559NathanAbbott Way
12 Stanford.CA 94305-8610
Telephone:(650) 724-0014
13 Facsimile:(650) 723-4426
14 Attorneysfor Plaintiffs
NELSON CHU PA VLOSKY and LUKE
15 mOMAS SMITH

16 UNITED STATF$ DISTRICT COURT


7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
18 ONLINE POLICY GROUP, NELSON CHU No. C-O3-4913JF
PA VLOSKY, and LUKE mOMAS SMITH,
19 SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL
Plaintiffs, I DECLARATION OF LUKE THOMAS
20
SMITH IN SUPPORTOF ORDER TO
21 v SHOW CAUSE RE: PRELIMINARY
J
INJUNCnON
22 DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED,andDIEBOLD ~
ELECTION SYSTEMS,INCORPORATED, )
23 )
Defendants
24
25 I, Luke ThomasSmidl, declare

26 I am Luke ThomasSmith,a plaintiff in the above-captioned


case.

27 2. On November4, 2003,NelsonPavlosky,Online Policy Group,and I had requested


28 an injunction againstDiebold orderingit to stop sendingcease-and-desist
lettersto Internetservice
-1-
SECONDSUPPLEMENTALDECLARAnON 0 MI1'H
11/12/03 23:15 FAX KINKOSSPRINGFIELD [lJOO3

providers of websites publishing the Diebold email archive I understandthat my lawyers

2 submittedwith the injunction requestan attachedset of emailsthat they referredto as the "e-mail

3 archive" and representedthat thosedocumentswere the Diebold emails publishedon the SCDC

4 website.

s 3 The documentssubmittedto this court were a subsetof the entirearchiveof Diebold

6 emails publishedon the SCDC website. The entire e-mail archive, if printed out, would fill an
1 enrirebanker's box with paper. However.the entire archive is not materially different from the

8 subset presented to the Court. It is just mol"e e-mails among Diebold employees during the same

Q timeframe.
10 4. On the SCDC website, the entire Diebold email archive was available in a

1 downloadablecomputerarchiveformat known asa .tar file, andalsoin a searchableHlML format

12 on the web page. HTML is the computerlanguagein which manyweb pagesarewritten.

13 5. In responseto Diebold's cease-and-desist


letter to Swarthmore,the collegeblocked

14 accessto the SCDC-hostcdemail archivein both the downloadable.tar format and the searchable

IS HTML format.

16 6. Thus,sinceI am currentlypreventedfrom publishingthe entire archive,not just the

17 subset,I hopeto republishthe entire e-mail archive. Accordingly,I askthis court to grantrelief as

18 to -the entire archive.

19 I declareunder penalty of peljury under the laws of the Stateof Pennsylvaniathat the

20 foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration was executed in S"lIJ~M,:;f'~ ,

21 Pennsylvania.
22 Date:
23
24
25

26
27
28
-2- !

You might also like