You are on page 1of 2

Federal Register / Vol. 72, No.

194 / Tuesday, October 9, 2007 / Notices 57371

information from submissions. You II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s fees, and other charges among its
should submit only information that Statement of the Purpose of, and members and other persons using its
you wish to make available publicly. All Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule facilities.
submissions should refer to File Change
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Number SR–NYSE–2007–88 and should In its filing with the Commission, the Statement on Burden on Competition
be submitted on or before October 30, Exchange included statements
2007. concerning the purpose of, and basis for, The Exchange does not believe that
For the Commission, by the Division of the proposed rule change. The text of the proposed rule change will impose
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated these statements may be examined at any burden on competition that is not
authority.11 the places specified in Item IV below. necessary or appropriate in furtherance
Nancy M. Morris, The Exchange has prepared summaries, of the purposes of the Act.
Secretary. set forth in Sections A, B, and C below, C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
[FR Doc. E7–19750 Filed 10–5–07; 8:45 am] of the most significant aspects of such Statement on Comments on the
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
statements. Proposed Rule Change Received From
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Members, Participants or Others
Statement of the Purpose of, and Written comments were neither
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule solicited nor received.
COMMISSION Change
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
[Release No. 34–56591; File No. SR–NYSE–
1. Purpose Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
2007–89] On September 1, 2007, the Exchange Commission Action
instituted a program to provide variable The foregoing proposed rule change
Self-Regulatory Organizations; New Liquidity Provision Payments to has become effective upon filing
York Stock Exchange LLC; Notice of specialist firms.3 pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Liquidity Provision Payments are Act 6 and Rule 19b–4(f)(2) 7 thereunder,
Proposed Rule Change To Institute a based on two revenue sources in NYSE- because it establishes or changes a due,
Revised System of Payments to listed securities (excluding exchange fee, or other charge imposed by the
Specialist Firms traded funds): (1) The Exchange’s share Exchange.
of market data revenue derived from At any time within 60 days of the
October 1, 2007.
quoting share; and (2) the Exchange’s filing of the proposed rule change, the
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the transaction fee revenue. Commission may summarily abrogate
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Under the transaction fee revenue such rule change if it appears to the
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 portion of the LPPs, the Exchange Commission that such action is
notice is hereby given that on distributes among the specialists each necessary or appropriate in the public
September 27, 2007, the New York month a payment pool consisting of the interest, for the protection of investors,
Stock Exchange LLC (‘‘Exchange’’ or Exchange’s NYSE-listed stock or otherwise in furtherance of the
‘‘NYSE’’) filed with the Securities and transaction revenue on matched volume purposes of the Act.
Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’) (excluding crossing services) in both
the proposed rule change as described electronic and manually executed IV. Solicitation of Comments
in Items I, II, and III below, which Items transactions. The pool size was initially Interested persons are invited to
have been substantially prepared by the set at 25% of the above-noted Exchange submit written data, views, and
Exchange. The Commission is transaction revenue and the Exchange arguments concerning the foregoing,
publishing this notice to solicit noted in the Initial LPP Filing that this including whether the proposed rule
comments on the proposed rule change percentage may change if the Exchange change is consistent with the Act.
from interested persons. adjusts its pricing and/or based on other Comments may be submitted by any of
conditions such as specialist the following methods:
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s performance. The Exchange proposes to
Statement of the Terms of Substance of reset at 20% the percentage of Exchange Electronic Comments
the Proposed Rule Change transaction fee revenue allocated to the • Use the Commission’s Internet
NYSE proposes to amend its system of LPP payment pool for each of the three comment form (http://www.sec.gov/
variable payments to specialist firms for months in the three-month period rules/sro.shtml); or
liquidity provision (‘‘Liquidity commencing October 1, 2007. In January • Send an e-mail to rule-
Provision Payments’’ or ‘‘LPPs’’). For 2008, and each month thereafter, the comments@sec.gov. Please include File
each of the three months in the three- percentage allocated will be 17%. Number SR–NYSE–2007–89 on the
month period commencing October 1, 2. Statutory Basis subject line.
2007, 20% of Exchange transaction fee
The Exchange believes that the Paper Comments
revenues will be allocated to the
Liquidity Provision Payment pool. In proposed rule change is consistent with • Send paper comments in triplicate
January 2008, and each month the objectives of Section 6 of the Act 4 to Nancy M. Morris, Secretary,
thereafter, the percentage allocated will in general and furthers the objectives of Securities and Exchange Commission,
be 17%. The text of the proposed rule Section 6(b)(4) of the Act 5 in particular, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC
change is available at NYSE, the in that it is designed to provide for the 20549–1090.
equitable allocation of reasonable dues,
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES

Commission’s Public Reference Room, All submissions should refer to File


and http://www.nyse.com. 3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 56337
Number SR–NYSE–2007–89. This file
(August 29, 2007), 72 FR 51287 (September 6, 2007) number should be included on the
11 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). (SR–NYSE–2007–78) (the ‘‘Initial LPP Filing’’).
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 4 15 U.S.C. 78f. 6 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. 5 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4). 7 17 CFR 19b–4(f)(2).

VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:07 Oct 05, 2007 Jkt 214001 PO 00000 Frm 00088 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\09OCN1.SGM 09OCN1
57372 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 194 / Tuesday, October 9, 2007 / Notices

subject line if e-mail is used. To help the Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the OTP Firm accounts, are used to
Commission process and review your proposed rule change as described in facilitate customer orders. The Exchange
comments more efficiently, please use Items I, II, and III below, which Items also proposes adding language to the
only one method. The Commission will have been substantially prepared by the Rate Schedule, to clarify that the Firm
post all comments on the Commissions Exchange. On September 28, 2007, the Facilitation Fee is applicable to
Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/ NYSE Arca submitted Amendment No. manually executed orders only.
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the 1 to the proposed rule change. On Although effective upon filing, the
submission, all subsequent September 28, 2007, NYSE Arca Exchange intends this fee change to
amendments, all written statements withdrew Amendment No. 1 and filed become operative on October 1, 2007.
with respect to the proposed rule Amendment No. 2. NYSE Arca has NYSE Arca presently charges OTP
change that are filed with the designated this proposal as one Holders a Firm Facilitation Fee of $0.15
Commission, and all written establishing or changing a due, fee, or per contract. The Firm Facilitation Fee
communications relating to the other charge imposed by NYSE Arca is applicable when a proprietary trading
proposed rule change between the under Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act 3 account of an OTP Firm is used to
Commission and any person, other than and Rule 19b–4(f)(2) thereunder,4 which facilitate an order for a customer of the
those that may be withheld from the renders the proposal effective upon OTP Firm. As part of this filing, the
public in accordance with the filing with the Commission. The Exchange is now proposing to apply the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be Commission is publishing this notice to Firm Facilitation Fee to any transaction
available for inspection and copying in solicit comments on the proposed rule in which a firm proprietary account, of
the Commission’s Public Reference change, as amended, from interested either an OTP Firm or non-OTP Firm, is
Room, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, persons. used to facilitate an order for a customer
DC 20549, on official business days of that same firm.6 Presently, OTP Firms
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. are charged the Broker Dealer & Firm
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
Copies of such filing also will be Manual rate of $0.26 for facilitation
the Proposed Rule Change
available for inspection and copying at trades they execute on behalf of non-
the principal office of the NYSE. All NYSE Arca proposes to amend its OTP firms. According to the proposal,
comments received will be posted Schedule of Fees and Charges for the Exchange will now apply the Firm
without change; the Commission does Exchange Services (‘‘Rate Schedule’’). Facilitation rate of $0.15 to such trades.
not edit personal identifying The text of the proposed rule change is The Exchange proposes to establish a
information from submissions. You available at the Exchange, the pilot program, under which OTP Firms
should submit only information that Commission’s Public Reference Room, will be eligible for a monthly cap of
you wish to make available publicly. All and http://www.nysearca.com. $50,000 on Firm Facilitation Fees. The
submissions should refer to File II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s $50,000 cap will be applicable to each
Number SR–NYSE–2007–89 and should Statement of the Purpose of, and firm account that is used for facilitating
be submitted on or before October 30, Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule orders of customers of that same firm.
2007. Change Examples of how the Firm Facilitation
For the Commission, by the Division of Fee cap will be applied are shown
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated In its filing with the Commission, the below.
authority.8 Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for Example 1
Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary.
the proposed rule change and discussed OTP Firm A carries accounts for customers
any comments it received on the of the firm, for which the firm may, on
[FR Doc. E7–19751 Filed 10–5–07; 8:45 am] occasion, facilitate certain option orders.
proposed rule change. The text of these
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
statements may be examined at the During a given calendar month, the firm
facilitates a number of orders for their
places specified in Item IV below. NYSE customers, for which the firm incurs Firm
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE Arca has substantially prepared Facilitation Fees totaling $60,000. Under the
COMMISSION summaries, set forth in Sections A, B, Pilot Program, the fee cap would have been
and C below, of the most significant met, and the Firm would be billed only
[Release No. 34–56595; File No. SR– aspects of such statements. $50,000.
NYSEArca–2007–93]
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Example 2
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Statement of the Purpose of, and OTP Firm B carries accounts of public
Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule customers, as well as accounts of non-OTP
Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Change Firms, who themselves may wish to facilitate
Rule Change as Modified by orders for their own customers. During a
1. Purpose given calendar month, OTP Firm B
Amendment No. 2 Thereto Relating to represents facilitation orders for a non-OTP
Exchange Fees and Charges NYSE Arca states that the purpose of
Firm for which it incurs Firm Facilitation
this filing is to amend the existing NYSE Fees totaling $60,000. During the same
DATE: October 1, 2007. Arca Rate Schedule by establishing a month, OTP Firm B also represents
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the pilot program under which the facilitation orders for another non-OTP Firm
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Exchange will cap, on a monthly basis, for which they incur Facilitation Fees
(‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 the Firm Facilitation Fee (‘‘Pilot totaling $60,000. While OTP Firm B itself has
notice is hereby given that on Program’’). The Exchange also proposes
September 18, 2007, NYSE Arca, Inc. to apply the Firm Facilitation Fee when F) with the Options Clearing Corporation (‘‘OCC’’)
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES

(‘‘NYSE Arca’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed and is not an NYSE Arca OTP holder.
non-OTP Firm 5 accounts, as well as 6 In both instances the Firm Facilitation Fee will
with the Securities and Exchange
be applied to trades that have an OCC clearance
3 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii). account ‘‘F’’ on the trade side and an OCC clearance
8 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). 4 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2). account ‘‘C’’ on the contra side of the transaction.
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 5 A non-OTP Firm is a broker dealer whose Both sides of the trade will clear under the same
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. proprietary trades clear as Firm (clearance symbol clearing firm symbol.

VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:07 Oct 05, 2007 Jkt 214001 PO 00000 Frm 00089 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\09OCN1.SGM 09OCN1

You might also like