You are on page 1of 2

15740 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No.

62 / Monday, April 2, 2007 / Notices

B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s including whether the proposed rule SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
Statement on Burden on Competition change is consistent with the Act. COMMISSION
NASD does not believe that the Comments may be submitted by any of
[Release No. 34–55525; File No. SR–NFA–
proposed rule change will result in any the following methods: 2007–01]
burden on competition that is not Electronic Comments
necessary or appropriate in furtherance Self-Regulatory Organization; National
of the purposes of the Act. • Use the Commission’s Internet Futures Association; Notice of Filing
comment form (http://www.sec.gov/ and Immediate Effectiveness of a
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Proposed Amendment Relating to NFA
Statement on Comments on the rules/sro.shtml); or
Compliance Rule 2–10
Proposed Rule Change Received From • Send an e-mail to rule-
Members, Participants or Others comments@sec.gov. Please include File March 26, 2007.
Written comments were neither Number SR–NASD–2007–025 on the Pursuant to Section 19(b)(7) of the
solicited nor received. subject line. Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–7 under the
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Paper Comments Act,2 notice is hereby given that on
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for February 27, 2007, National Futures
• Send paper comments in triplicate
Commission Action Association (‘‘NFA’’) filed with the
to Nancy M. Morris, Secretary,
Because the foregoing proposed rule Securities and Exchange Commission, Securities and Exchange Commission
change does not: 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC (‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
(i) Significantly affect the protection 20549–1090. change described in Items I, II, and III
of investors or the public interest; below, which Items have been
(ii) Impose any significant burden on All submissions should refer to File substantially prepared by NFA. The
competition; and Number SR–NASD–2007–025. This file Commission is publishing this notice to
(iii) Become operative for 30 days number should be included on the solicit comments on the proposed rule
from the date on which it was filed, or subject line if e-mail is used. To help the change from interested persons. NFA
such shorter time as the Commission Commission process and review your also has filed the proposed rule change
may designate, it has become effective comments more efficiently, please use with the Commodity Futures Trading
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the only one method. The Commission will Commission (‘‘CFTC’’).
Act 9 and Rule 19b–4(f)(6) thereunder.10 post all comments on the Commission’s NFA, on February 26, 2007, submitted
At any time within 60 days of the filing Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/ the proposed rule change to the CFTC
of the proposed rule change, the rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the for approval. The CFTC approved the
Commission may summarily abrogate submission, all subsequent proposed rule change on March 12,
such rule change if it appears to the amendments, all written statements 2007.3
Commission that such action is with respect to the proposed rule I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
necessary or appropriate in the public change that are filed with the Description of the Proposed Rule
interest, for the protection of investors, Commission, and all written Change
or otherwise in furtherance of the communications relating to the
purposes of the Act. Section 15A(k) of the Act 4 makes
proposed rule change between the
NASD has asked that the Commission NFA a national securities association for
Commission and any person, other than
waive the 30-day operative delay set the limited purpose of regulating the
those that may be withheld from the
forth in Rule 19b–4(f)(6)(iii) under the activities of NFA members (‘‘Members’’)
public in accordance with the
Act 11 to allow the proposed rule change who are registered as brokers or dealers
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
to be implemented on the first day of in security futures products under
available for inspection and copying in
operation of the NASD/NYSE TRF, Section 15(b)(11) of the Act.5 NFA
the Commission’s Public Reference Compliance Rule 2–10(b) applies to all
which is currently anticipated to be in Room. Copies of such filing also will be futures commission merchant (‘‘FCM’’)
April 2007. The Commission believes
available for inspection and copying at Members, including those who are
such waiver is consistent with the
the principal office of NASD. All registered as security futures brokers or
protection of investors and the public
comments received will be posted dealers under Section 15(b)(11) of the
interest, for it will allow the proposed
without change; the Commission does Act.
fees and credits to be in place at the
not edit personal identifying NFA Compliance Rule 2–10 currently
time NASD begins operating the NASD/
information from submissions. You requires FCM Members to maintain
NYSE TRF. For these reasons, the
should submit only information that their books and records in an office
Commission designates the proposal to
you wish to make available publicly. All located in either the U.S. or a
be operative upon filing with the
submissions should refer to File jurisdiction that the CFTC has
Commission.12
Number SR–NASD–2007–025 and determined to have a comparable
IV. Solicitation of Comments should be submitted on or before April regulatory scheme for purposes of the
Interested persons are invited to 23, 2007. CFTC’s Part 30 regulation.6 The
submit written data, views, and For the Commission, by the Division of amendment requires the U.S. or Part 30
arguments concerning the foregoing, Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(7).
authority.13
9 15 2 17 CFR 240.19b–7.
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A). Florence E. Harmon,
hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with NOTICES

10 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). 3 See Letter from Eileen Donovan, Acting

11 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6)(iii). Deputy Secretary. Secretary, CFTC, to Thomas W. Sexton, General


12 For purposes only of waiving the 30-day [FR Doc. E7–5979 Filed 3–30–07; 8:45 am] Counsel, NFA, dated March 12, 2007, confirming
operative delay of this proposal, the Commission approval of the proposal.
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P 4 15 U.S.C. 78o–3(k).
has considered the proposed rule’s impact on
5 15 U.S.C. 78o(b)(11).
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. 15
U.S.C. 78c(f). 13 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). 6 17 CFR 30.1–30.12.

VerDate Aug<31>2005 18:39 Mar 30, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00097 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\02APN1.SGM 02APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 62 / Monday, April 2, 2007 / Notices 15741

jurisdiction office to be under the English, and is knowledgeable about the including whether the proposed rule
supervision of an associated person Member’s business and about financial change is consistent with the Act.
(‘‘AP’’) principal resident in that office. matters, the absence of a resident AP Comments may be submitted by any of
principal can be problematic when NFA the following methods:
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
is seeking information from an FCM.8
Statement of the Purpose of, and Accordingly, NFA amends Electronic Comments
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Compliance Rule 2–10(b) to require that • Use the Commission’s Internet
Change an FCM’s books and records be kept in comment form (http://www.sec.gov/
In its filing with the Commission, a U.S. or Part 30 office that is under the rules/sro.shtml); or
NFA has prepared statements supervision of an AP principal resident • Send an e-mail to
concerning the purpose of, and basis for, in that office. As is currently the case, rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
the proposed rule change, burdens on a firm could only use an office in a Part File No. SR–NFA–2007–01 on the
competition, and comments received 30 jurisdiction if the firm is actually subject line.
from members, participants, and others. subject to regulation in that jurisdiction.
The text of these statements may be Paper Comments
2. Statutory Basis
examined at the places specified in Item • Send paper comments in triplicate
IV below. NFA has prepared summaries, The rule change is authorized by, and
to Nancy M. Morris, Secretary,
set forth in Sections A, B, and C below, consistent with, Section 15A(k) of the
Securities and Exchange Commission,
of the most significant aspects of such Act.9
100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC
statements. B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 20549–1090.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Burden on Competition All submissions should refer to File No.
Statement of the Purpose of, and The rule change will not impose any SR–NFA–2007–01. This file number
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule burden on competition that is not should be included on the subject line
Change necessary or appropriate in furtherance if e-mail is used. To help the
1. Purpose of the purposes of the Act and the Commission process and review your
Commodity Exchange Act. comments more efficiently, please use
In November 2005, NFA’s Board only one method. The Commission will
adopted amendments to NFA C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
post all comments on the Commission’s
Compliance Rule 2–10 to require FCMs Statement of Comments on the
Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/
to maintain their books and records in Proposed Rule Change Received From
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
an office located in either the U.S. or a Members, Participants, or Others
submission, all subsequent
Part 30 jurisdiction (if the firm is subject NFA did not publish the rule change amendments, all written statements
to the Part 30 regulatory scheme).7 The to the membership for comment. NFA with respect to the proposed rule
rule does not require the office to be did not receive comment letters change that are filed with the
under the supervision of an AP concerning the rule change. Commission, and all written
principal resident in that office, III. Date of Effectiveness of the communications relating to the
however. Proposed Rule Change and Timing for proposed rule change between the
This creates several potential Commission Action Commission and any person, other than
problems. First, the rule allows the those that may be withheld from the
firm’s principals to supervise the office NFA, on February 26, 2007, submitted public in accordance with the
from a remote location. Without a the proposed amendments to NFA provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
principal on the premise to oversee the Compliance Rule 2–10 to the CFTC for available for inspection and copying in
office’s day-to-day recordkeeping approval. The CFTC approved the the Commission’s Public Reference
activities, the firm is less likely to proposed rule change on March 12, Room. Copies of such filing will also be
discover potential problems quickly. 2007. available for inspection and copying at
Second, there may be no one in the Within 60 days of the date of the principal office of NFA. All
office who is subject to NFA’s effectiveness of the proposed rule comments received will be posted
disciplinary jurisdiction. Although the change, the Commission, after without change; the Commission does
firm’s AP principals may ultimately be consultation with the CFTC, may not edit personal identifying
responsible for the firm’s books and summarily abrogate the proposed rule information from submissions. You
records violations, their distance from change and require that the proposed should submit only information that
the office could dilute their sense of rule change be refiled in accordance you wish to make available publicly. All
accountability as well as the with the provisions of Section 19(b)(1) submissions should refer to File No.
accountability of those in the office. of the Act.10 SR–NFA–2007–01 and should be
The lack of a resident principal also IV. Solicitation of Comments submitted on or before April 23, 2007.
means that NFA Compliance staff may For the Commission, by the Division of
Interested persons are invited to
not have ready access to someone who Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
submit written data, views, and
can answer questions during an audit or authority.11
arguments concerning the foregoing,
investigation. Although Compliance Florence E. Harmon,
Rule 2–10 requires all Members to have 8 Telephone conversation between Kathryn Page
Deputy Secretary.
an individual who is authorized to act
hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with NOTICES

Camp, Associate General Counsel, NFA, and Molly [FR Doc. E7–5989 Filed 3–30–07; 8:45 am]
on the Member’s behalf, is fluent in M. Kim, Special Counsel, Division of Market
Regulation, Commission, on March 22, 2007. BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
7 See 9 15 U.S.C. 78o–3(k).
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 53190
(January 30, 2006), 71 FR 6119 (February 6, 2006). 10 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 11 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(75).

VerDate Aug<31>2005 18:39 Mar 30, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00098 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\02APN1.SGM 02APN1

You might also like