Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Submitted By:
FGS/MBus/2015/05
C.W.K.kuruppu
Arachchi
Abstract:
INTRODUCTION
DEFINITON
03
04
07
VARIANCE CALCULATION
CAUSES OF VARIANCE
05
08
12
INVESTINGATING VARIANCE
14
16
20
Under a standard costing system an organization can value stock at standard cost,
incorporating this within the ledger or cost accounts of the organization, the budget or
forecasts being a memorandum kept outside the ledger accounts.
Types of Standard
Ideal Standard e.g. attained under the most favorable conditions with no allowance for
any waste, scrap, idle time or downtime.
Attainable or Expected Standard e.g. what should be achieved with a reasonable level
of effort given current efficiency and cost levels.
Loose Standard e.g. loosely set and easy to achieve.
Basic Standard e.g. first standard ever used by the organization and used as a basis or
yardstick for comparing current standards or monitoring trends over time.
Historical Standards e.g. standards used historically in previous accounting periods.
Standard Costing
Costing is the identification of the value of resources used for specified goods or services.
One purpose of costing is to determine what resources were required to provide the goods
or services. A second purpose is to provide a guide to resource usage through the use of
budgets that clearly identify managers' responsibility. It is the second purpose that is
considered in the following discussion.
4
Variance analysis
By comparing a flexed budget, which has been prepared using standard cost information
to actual results, total variances can be calculated. These reconcilable differences between
the two statements can then be sub-dividend further, calculated, interpreted and used to
correct problems within the organization to stay on target through control action by
management or employees.
Variances Can Occur For The Following Reasons
Inaccurate data when creating standards, producing the budget or compiling actual
results
4
Variance calculation
Cost Variances
Material Variances:
1. Material Cost Variance
=
=
3. Material Usage
Variance
5. Material Sub-Usage Variance = Std. Price of Std. Mix (Total Std. Qty. - Total
Actual Qty.)
=
Standard Cost - (Actual Qty. x Std. Price of
Std. Mix)
Standard Yield)
7. Standard Price of Standard Mix =
=
Std. Cost of Actual Qty. / Total
8. Standard Price of Actual Mix Actual Qty.
Labour Variances:
1. Labour Cost Variance
=
=
=
=
3. Labour Efficiency
Variance
=
=
5. Labour Sub-Efficiency
Variance
=
=
=
=
Variable Overhead
Variances:
1. Variable Overhead Variance =
Standard Variable Overheads - Actual
Variable O/hs
2. Variable Overhead Budget/ Expenditure Variance
=
Budgeted Variable Overheads - Actual Variable O/hs for actual hrs.
Hrs.
(units)
Absorption
(units)
4. Capacity Variance
=
Std. Fixed O/h
Budgeted Hrs.
Rate/ Hr. Capacity
Capacity
Absorption Actual
Hrs. -
5. Efficiency Variance
6. Calander Variance
Budgeted Hrs.)
Sales Variances
Sales Mix
Variance
Sales Margin
Variance
Sales Margin
Sales Margin
Sales Margin
Sales Margin
Quantity Variance
Mix Variance
Per Unit
C.W.K.Kuruppu
Arachchi
20
1
Budgeted Mix
8. Sales Margin Mix Variance = Total Actual Qty. Budgeted Margin - Budgeted
Margin
Sold per unit of per unit of
Actual Mix Budgeted Mix
C.W.K.Kuruppu
Arachchi
20
Causes of variances
Material price variance
C.W.K.Kuruppu
Arachchi
20
labor
Variable Overhead Variance
Investigating Variances
Statistical Methods For Interpretation
Variances can be expressed relatively rather than absolutely, the variance is normally
expressed as a percentage against the standard cost.
These percentages could be plotted on a graph from one period to the next, which would
provide managers with the following advantages.
Graphical presentation or percentages analyses over time allows easier interpretation
and clearer understanding by managers
Presenting variances over time allows trends to be identified easier
By working out percentages expressed against standard, it removes changes in
monetary size of the variance caused by changing activity levels, improving trend
analysis
Example of a variance chart
C.W.K.Kuruppu
Arachchi
20
C.W.K.Kuruppu
Arachchi
20
C.W.K.Kuruppu
Arachchi
20
However critism includes still the question of determining a realistic standard in the first place
and putting too much emphasis on bad planning rather than bad management and the analysis
can be more time consuming and costly than the conventional approach.
C.W.K.Kuruppu
Arachchi
20
C.W.K.Kuruppu
Arachchi
20
C.W.K.Kuruppu
Arachchi
20
C.W.K.Kuruppu
Arachchi
20
are favorable. For example, workers may put on a crash effort to increase output at
the end of the month to avoid an unfavorable labor efficiency variance. In the rush
to produce output quality may suffer.
3. Labor quantity standards and efficiency variances make two important assumptions.
First, they assume that the production process is labor-paced; if labor works faster,
output will go up. However, output in many companies is no longer determined by
how fast labor works; rather, it is determined by the processing speed of machines.
Second, the computations assume that labor is a variable cost. However, direct labor
may be essentially fixed, then an undue emphasis on labor efficiency variances creates
pressure to build excess work in process and finished goods inventories.
4. In some cases, a "favorable" variance can be as bad or worse than an "unfavorable"
variance. For example, McDonald's has a standard for the amount of hamburger meat
that should be in a Big Mac. A "favorable" variance would mean that less meat was
used than standard specifies. The result is a substandard Big Mac and possibly a
dissatisfied customer.
5. There may be a tendency with standard cost reporting systems to emphasize meeting
the standards to the exclusion of other important objectives such as maintaining and
improving quality, on-time delivery, and customer satisfaction. This tendency can be
reduced by using supplemental performance measures that focus on these other
objectives.
6. Just meeting standards may not be sufficient; continual improvement may be
necessary to survive in the current competitive environment. For this reason, some
companies focus on the trends in the standard cost variances - aiming for continual
improvement rather than just meeting the standards. In other companies, engineered
standards are being replaced either by a rolling average of actual costs, which is
expected to decline, or by very challenging target costs.
In sum, managers should exercise considerable care in their use of a standard cost system.
It is particularly important that managers go out of their way to focus on the positive,
rather than just on the negative, and to be aware of possible unintended consequences.
Nevertheless standard costs are still found in the vast majority of manufacturing
companies and in many service companies, although their use is changing. For evaluating
performance, standard cost variances may be supplanted in the future by a particularly
interesting development known as the balanced scorecard.
C.W.K.Kuruppu
Arachchi
20
C.W.K.Kuruppu
Arachchi
20
11