You are on page 1of 2

Federal Register / Vol. 72, No.

17 / Friday, January 26, 2007 / Notices 3897

VI. Conclusion approve the proposal on an accelerated In addition, proposed Rule 12 would
On the basis of the foregoing, the basis. provide that the NYSE Arbitration Rules
Commission finds that the proposed would apply to predispute arbitration
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
rule change is consistent with the agreements between NYSE Arca OTP
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
requirements of the Act and in Holders and OTP Firms and/or
the Proposed Rule Change
particular with the requirements of associated persons and their customers.
Section 6(b)(5) of the Act and the rules The Exchange proposes to amend Also, proposed Rule 12 would provide
and regulations thereunder. It is NYSE Arca Rule 12 to permit the that if any matter comes to the attention
therefore ordered, pursuant to Section arbitration rules of New York Stock of an arbitrator during and in
19(b)(2) of the Act, that the proposed Exchange, L.L.C. (NYSE Arbitration connection with the arbitrator’s
rule change (File No. SR–NYSE–2006– Rules) to govern arbitrations filed with participation in a proceeding, either
57) be and hereby is approved.7 the Exchange. The text of the proposed from the record of the proceeding or
rule change is available on the from material or communications
For the Commission by the Division of Exchange’s Web site (http://
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated related to the proceeding, that the
authority.8 www.nysearca.com), at the Exchange’s arbitrator has reason to believe may
Florence E. Harmon
principal office, and at the constitute a violation of the Exchange’s
Commission’s Public Reference Room. rules or the federal securities law, the
Deputy Secretary.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s arbitrator may refer the matter to NYSE
[FR Doc. E7–1227 Filed 1–25–07; 8:45 am]
Statement of the Purpose of, and Regulation, Inc. for disciplinary
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule investigation. With respect to payment
Change of arbitration awards, proposed Rule 12
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE would provide that any OTP Holder,
In its filing with the Commission, OTP Firm or associated person who fails
COMMISSION NYSE Arca included statements to honor an award of arbitrators
[Release No. 34–55141; File No. SR– concerning the purpose of and basis for appointed will be subject to disciplinary
NYSEArca–2006–55] the proposed rule and discussed any proceedings in accordance with NYSE
comments it received on the proposed Arca Rule 10.
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE rule. The text of these statements may Finally, proposed Rule 12 would
Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Order be examined at the places specified in provide that the submission of any
Granting Accelerated Approval of Item IV below. The NYSE Arca has matter to arbitration would in no way
Proposed Rule Change as Modified by prepared summaries, set forth in limit or preclude the right, action or
Amendments 1 and 2 Thereto Relating sections (A), (B) and (C) below, of the determination by the Exchange that it
to Arbitration most significant aspects of such would otherwise be authorized to adopt,
January 19, 2007. statements. administer or enforce.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 2. Statutory Basis
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Statement of the Purpose of, and
(‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 The Exchange states that the proposed
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
notice is hereby given that on change is consistent with Section 6(b)(5)
Change
September 5, 2006, the NYSE Arca, Inc. of the Act 5 in that it promotes just and
(‘‘NYSE Arca’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed 1. Purpose equitable principles of trade by ensuring
with the Securities and Exchange The purpose of this proposed rule that members and member organizations
Commission (‘‘Commission’’ or ‘‘SEC’’) change is to amend NYSE Arca Rule 12 and the public have a fair and impartial
the proposed rule as described in Items to permit all arbitrations filed with forum for the resolution of their
I, II and III below, which Items have NYSE Arca after January 31, 2007, other disputes.
been prepared by NYSE Arca. On than those arbitrations proposed to be B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
December 21, 2006, NYSE Arca specifically excepted in the rule, to be Statement on Burden on Competition
amended the proposed rule change governed by the NYSE Arbitration
(‘‘Amendment 1’’).3 NYSE Arca further The Exchange does not believe that
Rules. In general, Rule 12, as proposed the proposed rule change, as amended,
amended the proposed rule change on to be amended, would provide that any
January 5, 2007 (‘‘Amendment 2’’).4 The will impose any burden on competition
dispute, claim or controversy arising out that is not necessary or appropriate in
Commission is publishing this notice to of or in connection with the business of
solicit comments on the proposed rule furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
any Options Trading Permit Holder
change from interested persons and to (‘‘OTP Holders’’) or OTP Firm or arising C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
out of the employment or termination of Statement on Comments on the
7 In approving the proposed rule change, the
employment of associated person(s) Proposed Rule Change Received From
Commission considered the proposal’s impact on
the efficiency, competition, and capital formation. with any OTP Holder or OTP Firm may Members, Participants, or Others
15 U.S.C. 78c(f). be arbitrated under Rule 12 as proposed Written comments on the proposed
8 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). to be amended. The rule, however, rule change were neither solicited nor
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
would except: (1) A dispute, claim, or received.
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
controversy alleging employment
3 Amendment 1 provided that the NYSE
discrimination (including a sexual III. Solicitation of Comments
Arbitration Rules would apply to all arbitrations
filed with NYSE Arca after December 31, 2006, as harassment claim) in violation of a Interested persons are invited to
statute unless the parties have agreed to submit written data, views and
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES

well as made minor stylistic changes to the


proposed rule change. arbitrate it after the dispute arose; and arguments concerning the foregoing,
4 Amendment 2 provided that the NYSE
(2) any type of dispute, claim, or including whether the proposed rule
Arbitration Rules would apply to all arbitrations
filed with NYSE Arca after January 31, 2007, as well
controversy that is not permitted to be change is consistent with the Act.
as made a minor stylistic change to the proposed arbitrated under the NYSE Arbitration
rule change. Rules, such as class action claims. 5 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).

VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:19 Jan 25, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00119 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\26JAN1.SGM 26JAN1
3898 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 17 / Friday, January 26, 2007 / Notices

Comments may be submitted by any of exchange.6 In particular, the SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
the following methods: Commission finds that the proposed COMMISSION
rule change is consistent with Section
Electronic Comments
6(b)(5) of the Act 7 in that it promotes [Release No. 34–55142; File No. SR–
• Use the Commission’s Internet just and equitable principles of trade by NYSEArca–2006–54]
comment form (http://www.sec.gov/ ensuring that members and member
rules/sro.shtml); or organizations and the public have a fair Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE
and impartial forum for the resolution of Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Order
• Send an e-mail to rule-
their disputes. Granting Accelerated Approval of
comments@sec.gov. Please include File
No. SR–NYSEArca–2006–55 on the The Commission also believes that the Proposed Rule Change as Modified by
subject line. proposed rule change raises no issues Amendments 1 and 2 Thereto Relating
that have not been previously to Arbitration
Paper Comments considered by the Commission. The January 19, 2007.
• Send paper comments in triplicate proposed rule change will merely
amend NYSE Arca Rule 12 to permit the Pursuant to Section 19(b)(4) of the
to Nancy M. Morris, Secretary,
NYSE Arbitration Rules to govern the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Securities and Exchange Commission,
NYSE Arca’s arbitrations, except as (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC
specified in amended Rule 12. The notice is hereby given that on
20549–1090.
NYSE Arbitration Rules have previously September 5, 2006, the NYSE Arca, Inc.
All submissions should refer to File No. been approved by the Commission.8 (‘‘NYSE Arca’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed
SR–NYSEArca–2006–55. This file with the Securities and Exchange
After careful consideration, the
number should be included on the Commission (‘‘Commission’’ or ‘‘SEC’’)
Commission finds good cause, pursuant
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the the proposed rule as described in Items
to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,9 for
Commission process and review your I, II and III below, which Items have
approving the proposed rule change
comments more efficiently, please use been prepared by NYSE Arca. On
prior to the thirtieth day after the date
only one method. The Commission will December 21, 2006, NYSE Arca
of publication of notice in the Federal
post all comments on the Commission’s amended the proposed rule change
Register. Granting accelerated approval
Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/ (‘‘Amendment 1’’).3 NYSE Arca further
will help to expedite the integration of
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the amended the proposed rule change on
NYSE and NYSE Arca and remove
submission, all subsequent January 5, 2007 (‘‘Amendment 2’’).4 The
uncertainty that could arise through the
amendments, all written statements Commission is publishing this notice to
application of multiple sets of rules
with respect to the proposed rule solicit comments on the proposed rule
governing arbitrations in the NYSE
change that are filed with the change, as amended, from interested
forum. Accordingly, the Commission
Commission, and all written persons and to approve the proposal on
communications relating to the believes that there is good cause,
an accelerated basis.
proposed rule change between the consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the
Commission and any person, other than Act,10 to approve the proposal on an I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
those that may be withheld from the accelerated basis. Statement of the Terms of Substance of
public in accordance with the the Proposed Rule Change
V. Conclusion
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
The Exchange proposes, through its
available for inspection and copying in It is therefore ordered, pursuant to
subsidiary, NYSE Arca Equities, Inc.
the Commission’s Public Reference Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,11 that the
(‘‘NYSE Arca Equities’’ or
Room, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, proposed rule change (SR–NYSEArca–
‘‘Corporation’’), to amend NYSE Arca
DC 20549–1090. Copies of such filing 2006–55), as amended by Amendments
Equities Rule 12 to permit the
will also be available for inspection and 1 and 2, is hereby approved on an
arbitration rules of New York Stock
copying at the principal offices of NYSE accelerated basis.
Arca. All comments received will be Exchange, L.L.C. (NYSE Arbitration
For the Commission, by the Division of Rules) to govern arbitrations filed with
posted without change; the Commission Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
does not edit personal identifying the Corporation. The text of the
authority.12 proposed rule change and all
information from submissions. You
Florence E. Harmon, subsequent amendments are available
should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All Deputy Secretary. on the Exchange’s Web site (http://
submissions should refer to File No. [FR Doc. E7–1183 Filed 1–25–07; 8:45 am] www.nysearca.com), at the Exchange’s
SR–NYSEArca–2006–55 and should be BILLING CODE 8011–01–P principal office, and at the
submitted on or before February 16, Commission’s Public Reference Room.
2007. 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
IV. Commission’s Findings and Order 6 Inapproving this proposal, the Commission has
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
Granting Accelerated Approval of considered its impact on efficiency, competition,
3 Amendment 1 provided that the NYSE

Proposed Rule Change and capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f). Arbitration Rules would apply to all arbitrations
7 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). filed with NYSE Arca Equities, Inc. after December
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES

The Commission finds that the 8 See 600 Series of the NYSE Rules.
31, 2006, as well as made minor stylistic changes
proposed rule change is consistent with to the proposed rule change.
9 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
4 Amendment 2 provided that the NYSE
the requirements of the Act and the 10 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
Arbitration Rules would apply to all arbitrations
rules and regulations thereunder, 11 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
filed with NYSE Arca Equities, Inc. after January 31,
applicable to a national securities 12 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). 2007.

VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:19 Jan 25, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00120 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\26JAN1.SGM 26JAN1

You might also like