Professional Documents
Culture Documents
such organization.6 Section 6(b)(5) of (‘‘Act’’), 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder, 2 Exchange’s experience with the Filter
the Act requires, among other things, notice is hereby given that on November has shown that one second is ample
that the rules of an exchange be 15, 2006, the Boston Stock Exchange, time for any party interested in trading
designed to foster cooperation and Inc. (‘‘BSE’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with with the exposed order at the NBBO to
coordination with persons engaged in the Securities and Exchange generate and send its contra-side order
regulating, clearing, settling, processing Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the to the BOX Trading Host for matching.
information with respect to, and proposed rule change as described in Consequently, the Exchange believes
facilitating transactions in securities and Items I and II below, which Items have that a reduction in this exposure time
to remove impediments to and perfect been prepared by BSE. The Commission will not result in an appreciable
the mechanism of a free and open is publishing this notice to solicit difference in the number of executions
market and a national market system.7 comments on the proposed rule change on BOX through the use of the Filter. In
The Commission finds that Amex’s rule from interested persons and is addition, the reduction in exposure time
change is consistent with these approving the proposal on an will permit the earlier generation and
requirements. By revising its rule accelerated basis. sending of an InterMarket Linkage P/A
regarding depository eligibility, Amex’s I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Order in the case where BOX is unable
proposed rule change fosters Statement of the Terms of Substance of to provide the NBBO price. Therefore,
cooperation and coordination with the Proposed Rule Change the Exchange believes that the filtered
persons engaged in clearing and settling order would have an improved chance
transactions in securities and perfects The Exchange proposes to amend
Section 16 (Execution and Price/Time of being executed at the NBBO before
the mechanism of a free and open the market moves to the disfavor of the
market and a national market system.8 Priority) of Chapter V of the Rules of the
Boston Options Exchange (‘‘BOX’’) to order.4
IV. Conclusion reduce the time that an order is exposed 2. Statutory Basis
On the basis of the foregoing, the in the internal BOX market when BOX
Commission finds that the proposed is not matching the national best bid or The Exchange believes that the
rule change is consistent with the offer (‘‘NBBO’’) from three seconds to proposed rule change is consistent with
requirements of the Act and the rules one second. The text of the proposed Section 6(b)5 of the Act, in general, and
and regulations thereunder applicable to rule change is available on the furthers the objectives of Section
a national securities exchange and in Exchange’s Internet Web site (http:// 6(b)(5) 6 in particular in that it is
particular Section 6(b)(5) of the Act and www.bostonstock.com), at the designed to promote just and equitable
the rules and regulations thereunder. Exchange’s principal office, and at the principles of trade, and to protect
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Commission’s Public Reference Room. investors and the public interest.
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,9 that the II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
proposed rule change (File No. SR– Statement of the Purpose of, and Statement on Burden on Competition
Amex–2006–80) be and hereby is Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
approved. Change The Exchange does not believe that
For the Commission by the Division of In its filing with the Commission, the the proposed rule change will impose
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated Exchange included statements any burden on competition not
authority.10 concerning the purpose of, and basis for, necessary or appropriate in furtherance
Florence E. Harmon, the proposed rule change and discussed of the purposes of the Act.
Deputy Secretary. any comments it received on the
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
[FR Doc. E6–21169 Filed 12–12–06; 8:45 am] proposal. The text of these statements
Statement on Comments on the
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P may be examined at the places specified
in Item III below. The Exchange has Proposed Rule Change Received From
prepared summaries, set forth in Members, Participants or Others
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE Sections A, B, and C below, of the most The Exchange has neither solicited
COMMISSION significant aspects of such statements. nor received written comments on the
[Release No. 34–54884; File No. SR–BSE– A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s proposed rule change.
2006–52] Statement of the Purpose of, and the
III. Solicitation of Comments
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Boston Change Interested persons are invited to
Stock Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing submit written data, views, and
and Order Granting Accelerated 1. Purpose
arguments concerning the foregoing,
Approval of a Proposed Rule Change The Exchange proposes to amend including whether the proposed rule
Relating to the Time a Marketable Section 16 (Execution and Price/Time change is consistent with the Act.
Order Is Exposed on the BOX Book Priority) of Chapter V of the BOX Rules
Comments may be submitted by any of
to reduce the time that an order is
December 6, 2006. the following methods:
exposed in the internal BOX market
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the when the BOX best bid and offer 4 The Exchange asked the Commission to
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘BBO’’) is not matching the NBBO from incorporate in the Purpose section of this notice the
three seconds to one second. 3 The purpose discussion in the Form 19b–4 submitted
6 15 U.S.C. 78s(b). for this filing rather than the discussion in the
hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with NOTICES
7 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(l). Exhibit 1 for the filing. E-mail communication
8 In approving the proposed rule change, the 2 17 between Brian Donnelly, AVP Regulation &
CFR 240. 19b–4.
Commission considered the proposal’s impact on 3 See BOX Rules, Chapter V, Section 16(b) Compliance, BSE, and Leah Mesfin, Special
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. 15 ‘‘Filtering of BOX In-Bound Orders to Prevent Counsel, Division of Market Regulation,
U.S.C. 78c(f). Trade-Throughs.’’ This rule and the mechanism Commission on December 5, 2006.
9 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2). 5 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
utilized by BOX for this purpose are called the
10 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). ‘‘Filter.’’ 6 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
VerDate Aug<31>2005 21:31 Dec 12, 2006 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00070 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\13DEN1.SGM 13DEN1
74966 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 239 / Wednesday, December 13, 2006 / Notices
VerDate Aug<31>2005 21:31 Dec 12, 2006 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00071 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\13DEN1.SGM 13DEN1