Professional Documents
Culture Documents
he
]ID
Eric Sc11i11r
Chss E11trpriss 111c.
1994
54321
Co11te11ts
Chpte: Otte:: 1tttob14ctiott -----------------------------4
Chpte: Two: he: Mitt Litte: witJ. 8.Qb3 --------------- 7
Chpte: he:e:: itt Litte: 8.3 ------------------------ 27
Chpte: f14: Mitt Litte:, OtJ.e: 8tJ. moe:s ----------- 34
Chpte: fie:: 7 De:7 ----------------------------------- 42
..
-------------------------
---
$4
---------------------
Nxa6 1 3 . Bc4 Nb4 14.0-0 Bc7 1 5 .f4 Nc2 16.Rac l Ne3 1 7 . Rfel
Bxe5 18.fxe5 Nxc4 19.exf6 Nxb2 09...gxf6 20.Nxe4 fxg5
21.Rxc4) 20.fxg7 Rf5 2 1 . Bh6 Rf6 22.Bg5 Rg6 23.Nxe4 Nd3
24.Nf6+ g7 25.Nh5+ Kg8 26.Nf4 (26.Nf6+ /7 27. Rfl Rxg5
28.Ne4+ Kg6 29.Nxg5 Nxcl-+) 26 ... Nxf4 27.Bxf4 Rxa2 28.g3
Bb7 29.h4 Rg2+ 30.Kfl Rf6 3 1 .Rc3 c4 3 2. Rbl Bd5 33.Rb8+ f7
34. Rd8 Rxg3 35.Rxg3 Rxf4+ 36.Ke2 Rxh4 and at this point
abandoned the game as uninteresting. let the computer play
out the remainder, and it reached a rook vs. bishop ending
with no pawns, which it had no idea how to play.
6...b4 7.Ne4 d6
7 . . . Be7 is considered in Chapter 5 .
Pet rosian
evednichy,
Sibenik 1990
-
...
Be7
8 ... exd5 9. Bxf6 gxf6 10. cxd5 Nd7 l l .e3 -Alburt 1 985.
9.dxe6
a) 9. Bxf6 is also possible, and now:
.
al) 9 ...Bxf6 10.dxe6 Bxe6 10... 0-0 11.0-0-0 Bxe6
12. Qxd6 -Albrt 1985. and now:
a 1 1 ) 1 1 .0-0-0 Be7 1 2 .Nxd6+ Bxd6 1 3 . Qxd6 Qxd6
1 4 . Rxd6 Bxc4 1 5 .e3 Ke7! = -Alburt 1985.
a 1 2) l l .Nxf6+ Qxf6 1 2 . 0-0-0 0-0 1 3 . Qxd6 Nd7 14.e3 a5!
and Black will achieve counterplay by advancing the a-pawn
-Alburt 1985.
7
9 ... fxe6
Tl1is is playable,
Neverov-Zaichik.
bt perhaps
not best.
9 ... Bxe6
'
12 .cxd5 Qxd5
1 2 ... exd5 1 3.Ng3 oo
9
14 . . . Bb7 is met by 1 5 . Nd6+
15.Rdl
1 5 . Rh5 Bxa2 16.Nxc5 Bf7 17.Rf5 Bg6 18.Rd5 Bf7
15 ... Bxa2
16.Ned2
16.e3 is suggested by Petrosian without further comment.
think it is too slow. 16 ... Nc6 17.Bd3 c4 18.Bbl Bb3 19.Bc2
Bxc2 20 .c2 Rd8+
16 ... c4
Perhaps this should have been preceeded by the
development of the knight, e.g. 16 ... Nc6 17.b3 c4 18.Kb2 Bxb3.
19.Nxb3 cxb3 20 .b3 a5 2 l .Ral f7 22.e3 Rhd8 23 . Bc4+ Kg7
24 . Bb5 Ne5 25.Nxe5 fxe5 Black is better, but it is by no means
clear that he can win.
17. e3 c3
Black is playing too aggressively considering that his
rooks and knight remain in their initial positions.
10
2 0. Bc4 ! Bxc4
20 ... Bxb l 2 1 .xb l;;!;
rr===;;o;;=
=;=- ===;:;m
;;=;;;
$; ....,.
;=:=,;=;;=
==;=;
t
i%
ft
The endgame is clearly White's favor since the Black
pawns are all weak and the effectiveness of the a-pawn is
limited by the White king on the qeenside.
2 5 ... Ne7
25 ... Ne5 26.Kc2
2 6.Rb3
10
11
4 l .Rc8
a) 41 .Rxf5 a3 42.Rf8 Kb7
b) 4 1 . Rc3 Rb4+ 42.Kd3 42.Rc4 Kb5 42.Ke5 Rb3 Rb2
12
4 7.f6 Rxh2
47 ... Rh5+ 48.Ke4 48 .Ke6 Rxh2 49.f7 Rf2 Rh4+ 49.f3 Rh5
49 . . . Rh6 50.Rb6 50 .Rb6+-
endgame!
Notes
after
Petrosian
in
Neverov - Zaichik,
Barnaul 198 8
l.d4 Nf6 2 .c4 e6 3 .Nf3 a6 4 .Nc3 c5 5.d5 b5
6.Bg5 b4 7.Ne4 d6 8 .Qd3
8 ... Be7
8 . . . Ra7 ' Nankin-Kozlov.
9.dxe6 Bxe6!?
This does leave Black witl1 a backward pawn at d6, bt at
tl1e sane tine it brings the bishop into the gane and sports
an evental advance of the d-pawn .
12
13
13
14
2 0 ...Rda7
Now the march of the h-pawn is simple and decisive.
Naumkin - Kozlov,
Soviet U nion 1986
l .d4 Nf6 2 .c4 e6 3 .Nf3 a6 4.Nc3 c5 5.d5 b5
6. Bg5 b4 7.Ne4 d6 8 .Qd3 Ra7! ?
15
19.Kbl Bg4?
2 0.Rdel !
Black is now pnished for failre to remove his king from
the center.
2 0 ...Re7
a) 20 ... Bxf3 2 1 . Ng5+ f8 22. Qxf4
15
16
25. f5!
l1e Bg4 is now stranded.
3 0 . Nxd6+ !
30 . Bb5 Nxe l 31 .Rxel Kd8 32. Bxd7 d7
17
17
18
10.e4
19
19
20
20
21
: ,S
tt
t t
ft
ft
4J
f .,#f f
.J.1. .rJ.1.1
k .( .!.1. ,(.!1
liE!:
l l ... Nf8 ? !
l l ... f5 1 2 .Bxe7 (12.Bg3 fxe4 13.Bxe4 Nf6 14.Bc2:t)
1 2 . . . Qxe7 1 3 . 0-0 f4 14.Qd2 e5 1 5 .g3 - Van der Sterren 1986.
22
2 l .exf5 exf5
2 2 .Ng5!
White doinates the center, and with this ove
nleashes the potential energy of the f-file and h2-b8
diagonal, since Black st captre the knight.
2 2 ... Bxg5
22 ... Qc8 23 .Rxe7 Nxe7 24 .Qe2
26. Qxd6+ f6 27.Ne6 Bxe6 28. dxe6
Kg6
25 . Qxe7
Qe8
2 5.Qd2 ?
White issed a chance for a qick kill here . 25. Bf4! Rh5
26.Be3 Ne7 (26 Qf6 27. Bxc5) 27 .Qe2 Rh7 28. Qf2 Rc7 29.Bg5
Ng6 30 . Bxf5 Bxf5 3 1 . Qxf5 and Black wold not srvive for
long .
..
22
23
2 8 . Be2 ? !
28. Qf2! Rc8 29.Re3 Qf6 30. Rf3 -Van der Sterren.
23
24
*... >
tt
t t
ft
ft
4J
f
f'?f'f
.!1 t.!1:
>
..gyA;g
9 ... f5 10.a3
10.dxe6 Bxe6! oo -Cl1ernin & Dvoretsky 1987.
12 ... Bxc3 +
db
11.\
..iif.ILi7
/
,gy
;
. a.
r;:tt
" __, ..-.., ;;/_ !/,
t': t :;
f(;
c't. P4t ff
P&
/;
-'
'.
:t
f:.(
-;. /
:f
,;>
,,
';
?. cU. _fj
/;
/;
f;J/..
"'/ h
:
,-;
%/4
VffJ
!f/ //; .!1:
,.u,,
.!1
: f f
/..!1.;
P'f:
..!1. /..!1.;
,g,
.'0':4'/.<
2 3 . Bg2 !
23. Bxc8 Rxc8 24.Ral Rb8 provides sfficient conterplay.
25
26
2 8 .e4 ?
28.f2! Nf6 (28.. f8 29.Nc4 Ke7 30.Ral:t) 29.Nc4 Rb3
30.Rcl Ne8 3 l .e4
.
2 8 ...Kf8
Now the Black king has time to get to e7.
2 9.Bfl Rb2 ?!
The natral and correct move was 2 9 ... Ke7! , and only after
30.Bxa6, then 30 ... Rb2 .
3 0.Nc4 Rc2 ?
Probably the losing move, thogh Black was in great
difficlty anyway. For example : 30 ... Rb3 3 1 .Rcl Ke7 32.Ne3 h5
33.Bxa6 Nf6 34. Bd3 Rb2 (34.. .Bf3? 35. e5 Ng4 36exd6+ d6
37. Nc4+ d5 38.Nd2 and the bishop is trapped) 35.Rc2
26
27
Agzamov - Inkiov
Calcutta198 6
1.d4 Nf6 2 .c4 e6 3 .Nf3 a6 4.Nc3 c5 5.d5 b5
6. Bg5 b4 7.Ne4 d6 8 .a3 ! ?
8 ... bxa3
8 ... Be7?! ' Boensch-Teske .
27
28
: 11:
.. t
t t
ft
h
h
#'(.
f
"
f
;
:#:'kg
Ji
29
2 7 ... Bxg2
Forced.
15.Qbl Ra6!
17 ...dxc5 18 .fxe5
29
30
..
'='
eftir
&
.tr.t
.&
-f4-f
. ..
...u.
.t8'
'84i8
.
,;. '
? i
m mr
U
U.u.
- '@ -
The two pieces are stronger than the rook, and White's
central pawns are weak.
...
30
31
32
,lil;,
ll:\dl
.2..
5
i
t
.. .L
rt
-
w
f tt
;,'@!
..::.
illf.i
;
""/.
.!1.
f;
.%< ;;.if'
Jffi
ffi..::.
r
c!Ja, r
;-_,.
lj)M.ft
'R -%,
-Jffi
ffi
32
33
8 .. Qd7 9.Qc2
.
34
1 3 . Qxg7 Rf8
ll.dxe6
l l . Bh4 g5 1 2 . Bg3 e5 Qf5 .
ll ...Qc6 12.Qf5? !
1 2 . Qxc6+ Nxc6 1 3 .Bf4 Bxe6 14.e3 Ne5 1 5 .Nd2 with an
even endgame, according to Henley 1984.
13 ...Ra7!
This strong move, protecting the seventl1 rank, secures a
significant advantage for Black, because White's development
is lagging and the pawns are weak.
14.Nf7
1 4 . Nxh7 Rxh7! 1 5 . Qxh7 Bxe6 Black's bishop
guarantees a strong initiative according to Henley 1984.
pair
14 ...Rxf7!
surprising sacrifice , since it brings the White queen
close to the Black king. But White is attacking with a lone
queen, and there are no supporters in the area.
22 ...Nd7 23.Qe4
23.f4 Nb6! 24.b3 g6 25 ... Bg7, which will win because of
the control of the diagonal, according to Henley 1984 .
23 ...Qxe4
23 ... Ne5 24.f4
27 ...Ne5! 0-1
Here White
conclusion:
resigned.
Henley
35
provides
possible
36
28.Rh5 g6 29.Rh6
29.Rh3 Nd3+ 30 .Kd2 Nxf2
)! ''='
.erit=t
. '"
:
,.
;
'
'
.
lf .
:.t . :.t
&,
W.@i i' :.t
:.t
j?
.
w
1
r 4-
f J.1.
?{.@!
ft
!."\
"" '
"_)
.!."\.
"Z_)4- i'
4j.i'4j.i'
.:!1:.
4'J; ' '
'!W
/
(
'
.!1:.
9.e3
White mst attend to his development.
18 ...Qh4!
Black's attacking force is considerable, especially taking
into account the availability of the a8-hl diagonal to the
bishop at c8.
19.Nfxh5
a) 19.Nhl Bb7 20 .g3 Bxf4! ! 2 1 .gxh4 Bh2#
b) 1 9 . hxg4? hxg4 20 .Nh3 gxh3-+
IJ - IJ
lj.l_lj
:t
r:t
.L
:tr.-.
(. /
"Z.J
f4-.L ... -
{iii
r
.
/ ft
4- r BJNf 4-
-gJJ.
? lj IJE!IJ
22.f3
Forced.
22 ...Qxh5 23.fxg4
37
38
i=f}.
..;.
.t
{
. /
.t
?
.t
.t
:a .
'=!'
a ;a.:Uiiii1it
.!.!.
._
r ,...
..&;.!.!.
w
B'-"r
.ill
%
'%%
.ft
''<'W . .ft
.
.''<'
VJJ
i
'
39
8 ..Ra7 ?!
.
9.Bg2 e5
9 ... Be7= -Gipslis ECO .
10.a3!
White strikes qickly the qeenside .
40
7 .Ne4 Be7
This is an obvious alternative to 7 . . . d6, but it has not
gained a strong following.
8.Bxf6
a) 8.d6 Nxe4 9. Bxe7 Qb6 -Lerner 1985.
b) 8 . Qd3 Nxe4 9. Qxe4 Bb7 is nclear, bt there is nothing
nclear abot 9 ... Bxg5? 1 0 . dxe6 Nc6 1 1 .exd7++- -Lerner 1 985.
8 ...Bxf6 9.Nd6+
9. Qd2 ' Lerner-Grgenidze .
40
41
1 6 . Qxh7
Bxb2
41
42
12.e3
White must not get carried away. 1 2 . g4?! exdS 1 3 . Qxd5
Ra7 14. Qxd6 Qxd6 1 5 . Nxd6 Bxg4 + -Lerner 1985 .
17 .Qd l!
1 7.Ng1? Bh4 18.Rh2 Ra7 + or
1 9 . Kg2 Qd7 +
17 ...Bh4 18.Nfd2
42
43
18 ...Ra7
20 ...Bf5
a) 20 ... Bxf2 2 1 .Ng5 Bxe3 2 2 . Nxf7 Bxf7) 22 Rxl7 23.Bxg6
hxg6 24.Rxe3) 2 3 . Bxh7+ h7 24.Rxe3
b) 20 ... Rf5 2 1 .Nxd6! Bh5 22.Nxf5 Bxg4+ 23.hxg4
-Lerner 1 985 .
...
43
44
Christiansen - Alburt
U .S . Championship 1985
l.d4 Nf6 2.Nf3 e6 3.c4 a6 4.Nc3 c5 5.d5 b5
6.e4 b4 7 .e5 bxc3 8.exf6
8 ...Qa5
a) 8 ... cxb2 9. Bxb2 gxf6 1 0 . Bd3 Bg7 oo - Henley 1 984.
b) 8 ...Qxf6 9.Bg5 Qg6 10.Bd3 with compensation,
according to Alburt 1985 . 10 ... Qh5 1 1 .0-0 and White is the
verge of winning, according to McCambridge 1986.
c) 8 ... g6 9.dxe6! -Alburt 1985.
9.bxc3 gxf6? !
9 ... Qxc3+ 1 0 . Bd2 Qxf6 l l . Bd3 oo -Alburt 1 985 . l l ... Bd6
1 2 .0-0
Bf4
1 3 . Qc2
Bxd2
14.Nxd2
Qh6
1 5 . Rab1 oo
Natamoros-Zaichik, Camaguey 1987. Black has some problems
developing the qeenside, and there really isn't any hope of a
kingside attack. I'd hate to be Black. Among other things, there
is Re 1-e3-h3 to wory abot.
44
45
10.Bd2
10 ... f5
10 ... h5!? Bh6.
Qxc3
14.Re 1
13.Re l 0-0
14.dxe6?!
45
0-0
1 5 .Rb1
46
14 ...fxe6 15.Ng5
20 ... e4?!
46
47
21.Bf4! Qd7 ? !
a)
2 1 ... exd3?
22.Bxd6
i s wnnng,
according
to
McCambridge 1986. He's right, but it isn't simple. 22 ... Qf7 and
now:
a l ) 23. Bxf8 Qxf8 (23 ... Bxf8 24. Qe5+ Qg7 2 5 . Qxb8 Kg8
26.Re8 Rf7 27. Qg3) and now:
a l l) 24.Rxb8 (24. Qe8 Nd7) Qxb8 2 5 . Qe8+ Qxe8
26.Rxe8+ Bf8 27.Rxf8+ Kg7 28. Rd8 28.Rxf5 Rd7 Rb7 29.f3 Rb1 +
30 . f2 Rb2+ 3 1 .g3 d2= ;
a 1 2) 24. Qb6! Ra8 2 5 . Qb7+a2) 2 3 . Qxf7 Raxf7 24. Bxf8 Rxf8 25. Red1 Bxc3 26.Rxd3
Bd4 27.Rdb3 Nc6 28.Rb6 ;!;;
b) The best move is 2 1 ... Rd8! 22.Bc2 Qd7 -Alburt 1 985 .
22.Qxd7 ?
White should have grabbed the pawn here, and settled
for equality. 2 2 . Qxd6! exd3 23.Rxb8 Qxd6 (23 ...d2? 24.Rdl
Rxb8 25. QxbB+ BfB 26.Bh6+- -Albrt 1985.) 24. Bxd6 Rxb8
2 5 . Bxb8 Rb7 26. Bf4 Bxc3 27.Rd1 Rb2 28.f1 -McCambridge
1 986.
47
48
24 ... Be5
28 ...Rf7
49
ll ... d6?
a) 11 ... 0--0 12.Bg5 QaS was suggested by linger, but
Benjamin & didn't find any relief after 13 .Rb1! Be7--d6.
b) 1 1 ... Bxc3 12.Rb1 0--0 1 3 . Bf4 d6 14. dxe6 fxe6 1 5 . Bc2
-Ftacnik 1987.
12.dxe6 fxe6
13.Bxf5! exf5
49
50
14.Qd5! Ra7
If 14 ... Qc7, then 1 5 .Re 1 + Kd7 16. Qf7+ Kc6 1 7 . Re7+-. The
remaining comments are based analysis by Ftacnik New
in Chess Yearbook 6.
15.Re l+ Kf8
Black has no choice, but now his game is hopeless:
15 ...Be5 1 6 .Nxe5 Re7 1 7 . Bg5 dxe5 18.Rxe5 Qxd5 19.Rxe7+ f8
20.cxd5 or 1 5 ... Re7 16.Bg5 Bf8 17.Bf6+-
16.Rb l Bxc3
Neither 16 ... Nd7 17. Qxd6+ Kg8 18.Re7 Qc7 1 9 . Qe6+ f8
20. Re8# or 16 ... Qc7 17. Bf4 Be5 18.Nxe5 Bb7 1 9 . Bh6++- work.
17 .Bh6+ Bg7
better is 17 ... Rg7 18.Rxb8 Bxe 1 19.Ng5 Qd7 20.Rxc8+
Qxc8 2 1 . Qf7#
i, .
r
-j
;,
'1!1/1'
'1!11' i
,;Q,
:t
m
... r f
JL
-:t
B.ftB
m
mf."-\
W%
W:"ZJ
m
ff
- - %
@'}]);
;;
'
<:
- " '
20.Rxc8!
50
51
23.Qg3+! Kf8
23 .. f7 24.Ng5+ Kg7 2 5 . Ne6+ f7 26.Qe5+.
51
52
6 ...Nc6
6 . . . h6 is also playable, for example :
a) Gulko - Gurgenidze, Volgodonsk, 1 98 1 : 7. Bxf6 Qxf6
8.e3 Nc6 9 . Be2 Bb4 10. 0-0 Bxc3 l l .bxc3 eS 1 2 . Nf3 d6= 1 3 . Qb3
0-0 1 4 . Rfd1 Qe7 1 5 . Rab1 Rd8 16.Rb2 Bd7 1 7.Rbd2 Bg4 1 8 . h3
Bxf3 1 9 . Bxf3 e4 20 .Be2 Rac8 2 1 . Qa3 NeS 22.Rxd6 Rxd6
23. Qxd6 Qxd6 24.Rxd6 Nxc4 25. Rd4 Nb2 26.Rxe4 Rxc3
27.Re8+ Kh7 28.Re7 Rc 1 + 29.h2 Rc2 30 . Bf3 Rxf2 3 1 .Rxf7 Kg8
3 2 . Rxb7 f8 33.Ra7 Nc4 34.Rxa6 Nxe3 3 5 . a4 Ra2 36.a5 Nfl +
37.Kg1 Nd2 38. Bd5 Ra 1 + 39.f2 Nb 1 40 . Ra7 Nc3 4 1 . Bc4 Ra3
42 . a6 Ne4+ 43.g1 Ra 1 + 10 .
52
53
7 .e3
a)7 .e4!?, suggested by Watson, is a Taimanov Sicilian
position.
b) Oei - Ashley, Groningen, 1990 : saw instead 7.Nxc6
bxc6 8.e4 Rb8 9.Qc2 9. e5 Qa5 9 ... Qa5 1 0 . Bd2 Qc7 l l . Rc 1 Bd6
1 2 . g3 h5 1 3 . Bg2 h4 14.Bg5 Ng4 1 5 .gxh4 f6 1 6 . Bd2 Rxh4 1 7 . h3
Ne5 18 .b3 g5 19.Ne2 c5 20. Bc3 Bb7 2 1 .Rd1 Ke7 22.f3 Rbh8
2 3 . d2 Ng6 24.Kc 1 Be5 2 5 . Kb1 Bc6 26.Rd2 a5 27. a4 Bxc3
28. Qxc3 Qe5 29. Qxa5 Nf4 30.Nxf4 Rxf4 3 1 .Rd3 Rfh4 3 2 .Rhd1
Rb8 33.Kc2 Rb4 34. Rd5 exd5 3 5 . Qxc5+ Qd6 36. Qxd6+ d6
37. exd5 Bxa4 38. bxa4 Rhxc4+ 39.Kd3 Rd4+ 40 .Ke2 Rb2+ 0-1
7 ...Be7
7 ... Qa5!? 8. Bxf6 gxf6 9.Be2 (Pomar-Lengyel, Amsterdam
1 969) 9 ... Bb4!? -ECO 1 979.
53
54
8.Be2
8 ...Qa5 9.Bf4
9.Bh4 0-0 9 ... Ne4 1 0 . Bxe7 Nxc3 l l .Nxc6 bxc6 1 2 . Qd2
e7 1 3 .bxc3 ;t 10.0-0 d6= -Tal 1 976.
9...Ne4
9 ... d5!? is possible, but not
-Tal 1 976.
10.Qc2
1 0 . Nb3 Nxc3 l l .Nxa5 Nxd1 1 2 . Nxc6 Nxe3 + -Tal 1976.
12.Nb3
1 2 . Nxc6 bxc6 1 3 . Bg3 0-0 14.Bd3 g6 f5 .
15 ...Be6
1 5 ... f5 16.f4 e4 17.Nd4 -Tal 1976.
55
8
.
:t
f
;t
f
- -& :t
r ll\ -- -
:t "a]f
.&;
..;
r
m ft mrm
m
.::. ?
-
}.- n..::. d
rg ft
.--. r
-
rt;
- t::!.
20. Bxb5 Nb4 2 1 . Qe4 (21. Qd2 Qxc3 22.Qxc3 Rxc3 23.Be1
Nxa2!+) 2 1 . . . Nd5 +
20 ...Na7 2 l.a4
2 1 . c4? is refuted by 2 1 . . . d5!
28.Kh l!
55
Cj(>
28 ... f5 29.Bd3?
29. Qdl was the correct move.
56
57
Balashov - Alburt
Taxco Inter zonal 1985
l. d4 Nf6 2. Nf3 e6 3.c4 a6 4.e3 c5 5. Nc3 b6
Black does not have to play b7-b6 rght away.
a) 5 . . . Qc7 s also seen, for example :
a1) 6. Bd3 d6 7.0- Nbd7 8.Re 1 g6 9.dxc5 Nxc5 1 0 . Bf1 b6
l l .b4 Ncd7 1 2 . Bb2 Bb7 1 3 .Nd4 Bg7 14.Ndb5 axb5 1 5 .Nxb5
Qc6 1 6 . Qxd6 Rb8 17 . Be5 Nh5 18.Bxg7 Nxg7 19.c5 bxc5
20.bxc5 Nf5 2 1 . Qxc6 Bxc6 22.Na7 Ne7 23.Rad1 Kd8 24. a4 Kc7
2 5 . Bb5 Nxc5 26.Nxc6 Nxc6 27. Rc 1 Kb6 28.Rxc5 c5 29. Rc 1 +
Kb4 30.Bxc6 Rhc8 3 1 .Rb1 + Kc3 3 2 . Bb5 Kd2 33.g3 Rc 1 + 34.Rxc 1
c 1 35 . Kg2 Kd2 36.g4 g 5 37 . Bc6 Rb2 38.Kg3 f6 39.Bd7 e 5
40 . Bb5 Ke 1 4 1 .f4 exf4+ 42. exf4 Rb3+ 43 .g2 gxf4 44. Bc6 Ke2
45.a5 f3+ 0-1 , Hernandez - Psakhs, Calctta, 1 988.
a2) 6 . Be2 d6 7. 0- Nbd7 8.a3 Be7 9.b4 b6 1 0 . Bb2 0-
l l .d5 e5 1 2 .e4 g6 1 3 . Ne1 Ne8 14.Nd3 Ng7 1 5 .a4 f5 16.a5 cxb4
1 7 . Nxb4 bxa5 18.Nc6 Bg5 19.Ba3 Bb7 20. Bf3 Rae8 2 1 .Rb1 Bc8
2 2 . Rb2 Rf7 23.Qa4 Ref8 24 .Qxa5 Qxa5 25.Nxa5 Bd8 26.Nb7
Bxb7 27.Rxb7 Ba5 28.Na4 fxe4 29. Bxe4 Ne8 30 . Bf3 Ndf6
3 1 . Rfb 1 Rxb7 32.Rxb7 Rf7 33.Rb8 Kg7 34 . Be2 Be 1 3 5 . Rb1 Bd2
36.Rb8 Be1 37.f3 a5 38.c5 Bb4 39. Bxb4 axb4 40 . Bc4 e4 4 1 .fxe4
Re7 42.Bd3 Nxe4 43. Bxe4 Rxe4 44 .c6 f6 45.Nb6 Nc7 46.Rb7
b3 47.Nd7+ Ke7 48.Rxb3 Nxd5 49 .Rb7 Kd8 50.Nf8 Re 1 + 5 1 .f2
Re7 52.Nxh7 Rxb7 53. cxb7 Kc7 54.Nf8 Ne7 5 5 .f3 b7 56.f4
Kc6 57.h4 d5 58.Ne6 Kd6 59.Nd4 Nc6 60 .Nb5+ Ke7 61 .Nc3 Ke6
62.g5 d4 112-112, Torre - Bschoff, Lgano, 1 988.
b) 5 . . . Be7 is also possible, e.g. , k - Romanshin,
Moscow, 1 986: 1 . d4 Nf6 2 . c4 e6 3 .Nf3 c5 4.e3 a6 5 . Nc3 Be7
6 . Be2 d6 7.0- Nbd7 8.b3 0- 9 . Bb2 b6 1 0 . a4 Rb8 l l .d5 e5
57
58
6.Bd3
6 . Be2 is even more passive . Qvotrup-Yefimov, Budapest
1 990 contined 1 .d4 Nf6 2 .Nf3 e6 3 . c4 a6 4 . Nc3 c5 5 . e3 b6
6 . Be2 d6 7 . 0-0 Bb7 8.b3 Nbd7 9.a4 g6 1 0 . Qc2 Bg7 l l .Rd1 0-0
1 2 . e4 cxd4 1 3 . Nxd4 Rc8 14.Ba3 Nc5 1 5 . Bf3 Qe7 16.b4 Ncd7
17.b5 Rxc4 18.Nc6 Qe8 19.e5 Nd5 20.Bxd5 exd5 2 1 . Bxd6 Nxe5
2 2 . Bxf8 Qxf8 23.Qb3 Nxc6 24.bxc6 Rxc3 2 5 . Qxb6 Bxc6
26. Qxa6 Be5 27.Rac1 Bxh2+ 28.Kfl Rxc 1 29. Rxc 1 Bd7 30. Qd3
Bf4 3 1 . Ra 1 h6 3 2 .g3 0- 1 .
6 ... d6
Orr - Crouch, Edinburgh, 1 988 saw instead 6 . . . Bb7 7. 0-0
Be7 8.b3 0-0 9.d5 exd5 10. cxd5 d6 l l .e4 b5 1 2 . a4 b4 1 3 .Nb 1
Ng4 1 4 . Nbd2 Bf6 1 5 . Ra2 Nd7 16.Nc4 Nde5 1 7 . Bb2 Nxc4
18.Bxc4 Bxb2 19.Rxb2 Qf6 20.Re2 Rae8 2 1 . Qd3 a5 2 2 . Ba6 Bxa6
23 . Qxa6 Ne5 24.Nxe5 Qxe5 25. Rfe 1 Ra8 26. Qc4 Rfe8 27.g3 g5
28 .Kg2 g4 29.h3 h5 30. hxg4 hxg4 3 1 .Rh 1 Qc3 3 2 . Qxc3 bxc3
3 3 . Rc 1 f5 34 .Rxc3 fxe4 3 5. Rce3 Rab8 36.Rxe4 Rxe4 37.Rxe4
Rxb3 38.Re6 Rb6 39.Rg6+ f7 40 .Rxg4 f6 41 .Re4 f5 42.f3 Rb4
58
59
8 ...Nbd7 9.Bb2 g6
9 ... Be7 with kingside castling to follow would be a more
orthodox approach. The double-fianchetto hedgehog is not
Albrt's intent here, so one wonders what motivated the
advance of the g-pawn. 1 0 . Ng5!? f4 is given by Mirkovic in
Informant 55, but am not sure see the point. 10 ... h6 1 1 .Nf3
10.dxc5
1 0 . Ng5 is probably stronger, according to analysis by
Mirkovic 1 992 in Informant 55 :
a) 1 0 ... h6 1 1 .Nxe6 (1J.Nge4f;t) 1 1 . . . fxe6 1 2 . Bxg6+ Ke7
1 3 .d5 oo ;
b) 1 0 ... Bg7!? 1 1 .f4 ;\; ;
c ) 1 0 . . . Be7 1 1 .f4 - 1 2 . Qe 1 Re8 1 3 . Qh4 Bf8 14.dxc5! h6
60
5 3 . Qe3 Re8 54. Qd2 Ra8 5 5 . Qe3 Kg8 56.f2 Re8 57.Qd2 Ra8
58. Qe3 Re8 59. Qd2 Rf8 60 . Qe3 Re8 6 1 . Qd2 1h-1h.
10 ...bxc5!
1 0 ... dxc5 l l .Qe2 and White will double rooks on the
d-file, with a small advantage . Anyway, this is an aggressive
opening and the capture toward the center brings many
interesting possibilities with it, at virtually no cost.
ll.Ne4
ll ...Be7
Capturing at e4 is out of the question.
a) l l ... Bxe4? 1 2 . Bxe4 Nxe4 1 3 . Bxh8 f6 14. Qd3 d5
1 5 .Rfdl
b) l l ... Nxe4?! 1 2 . Bxh8 f6 1 3 . Qc2 1 3 . g4!? d5 14.cxd5 exd5
1 5 . Bxe4 dxe4 16.Nd2 Qe7 1 7 . Nc4 with a strong initiative.
16.Rabl a5
60
2l ... a4?!
2 1 ... Ra7!? 2 2 . Nc3 Ra6
62
35.Qal?!
The endgame which follows holds few winning chances ,
and White would have done much better t o keep queens
the board.
3 5 . Qb7 Rf8! 35 ... Rxa3 36.Qc8+ h7 37.Nf7 Qf6
38.Rd7! f4 39. Qh8+ Kg6 40 .gxf4 gxf4 4 1 . Qh6+ f5 42. Qxf4+
Kg6 43.Nh8+ +- 36.a4 The White king is safe enough and the
a-pawn flies .
In kiov - Balashov
Y ur mala1985
l.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nf3 a6 4.Nc3 c5 5.e3 b6
6.Be2
This is a less ambitious plan.
6. . . d6
There is no reason why Black's shouldn't develop the
bishop immediately, e.g. , 6 . . . Bb7 7. 0-0 d6 8 . a3 Nbd7 9.b4 Qc7
1 0 . Qb3 Rc8 l l .Nd2 Be7 1 2 . Bb2 d5 1 3 . cxd5 exd5 14.bxc5 bxc5
62
63
7 . 0-0 Nbd7
7 . . . Be7 is a reasonable altemative : 8 . Qc2 0-0 9.dxc5 bxc5
1 0 . Rd1 Nc6 l l .b3 Qc7 was eqal in Berndorff-Ale ksieva,
Eropean Under-20 Womens's Championship 1 992, though the
game went downhill for Black: 1 2 . Bb2 Nb4 1 3 . Qb1 Rb8 14 .Ne 1
Bd7 1 5 . Bf3 Rfd8 1 6 . Rd2 Be8 1 7 . Qd1 Nd7 18.Qe2 Ne5 19 .Rad1
Nxf3+ 20. Qxf3 Nc6 2 1 . Qg3 Ne5 22.Ne4 Bc6 23.Nxd6 Ng6
24.Nf5 e5 2 5 . Bxe5 Rxd2 26.Rxd2 Qa5 27.Nxe7+ 1-0.
'=' i!J
ll.l
'='
----
..
... r ::
JL
:t . r.. :t
< "/"'
Wf#mW!%W!%
"'
'"
'
'
.
. ft ;z.J
N f.'\
&".
.(. "ZJ &"./
:l
rl:::
P;# f r
ig .il. !&1
f'..
rM
.!.1
tY l::::l
10. d5
63
64
10 ... e5!
White seems to have two weak bishops, though Black
will have difficulty finding a break.
14.f4
An ambitious plan. White might also have tried to play on
the queenside with 14.b4, according to Balashov 1 985.
14 ...Ng7 15.g4!
1 5 .exf5 gxf5 16.fxe5 dxe5 would have been better for
Black, according to Balashov 1985.
64
65
18.Kh l?!
18.Ne6 Nxe6 19.dxe6 Bxe6 20.exf5 Balashov claims
compensation here . After 20 ... Bxf5 , don't see it.
18 ...Ra7 19.Bd3?
mistake, which costs White the game. More resistant
was 19.Ne6 Bxe6 20.dxe6 Nxe6! 2 1 . exf5 Nd4 + .
65
66
Langeweg - L igter in k
Holland Champion ship 1984
l.d4 Nf6 2.Nf3 e6 3.c4 a6 4.e3
. W:lh?'
i,'=l'!
!fi1it &i
r: "r: '
.t p .t .t p .t
?
.t
.t .
ft '
Pr.ill
'LJ
.:.. r
r .:.. r
.. ;r,
;r,
.. ;r,
'
'
' ?'NWN -
oogs
67
Ne4 24.Nd2 Nc5 2 5 . Qc2 Bc6 26. Ra 1 Ra7 27. Rdb1 Rb7 28.Rxb7
Bxb7 29.Nb3 Be4 30. Qd1 Nb7 3 1 . Qd2 Bd8 3 2 . h3 Bf5 3 3 . Qd5
Qa7 34. Qb5 Bb6 3 5 .Be1 Be4 36. Qd7 Qb8 37.Ra2 Bc6 38. Qg4
Qc7 39. Bd3 Rb8 40. h4 Nc5 41 .Nxc5 Bxc5 42.Be4 h5 43 . Qf3 Rb1
44 . Re2 Bxe4 45. Qxe4 Ra1 46.h2 Rxa4 47. Rb2 Bb4 48. Qa8+
h7 49. Qe8 Ra 1 50. Bxb4 Qxc4 5 1 . Qd7 f6 52.f4 Qfl 53. Qd8
Qg1 + 54. Kg3 Qxe3+ 55.h2 Qxf4+ 56.g3 Qf3 57.Rg2 axb4
0- 1 .
7 .b4 Bd6
67
68
18 ... a5?
18 ... Rd8 ;!;
37 ... f5
Forced.
38.Bb2
Now there is a new diagonal to attack.
68
69
Mozn y
Vehi Bach
Biel 1990
-
14.. .Bxe3
15.Nxe3
Bxb5
16.axb5 Rxa1
17. Qxa1
Qb6+)
6. Nxd4 Qc7
We have transposed to a fairly orthodox hedgehog
position.
7. 0 - 0 ! ?
t now things get strange . more prosaic example is
Jn-Alburt, Sbotica interzonal 1 987: .b3 Nc6 8.0-0 Be7 9.Bb2
0-0 1 0 . Nc3 Rb8 l l . Rc1 Qa5 1 2 . e4 Nxd4 1 3 . Qxd4 d6 1 4 . a3 Bd7
1 5 .h3 Rfc8 16.Rfd1 Qh5 1 7 . Qe3 e5 18.Qe2 1/2 .
69
70
15.e4
70
71
71
72
5 . cxb5
White does not have to capture the pawn, of course:
a) 5 . Nbd2 bxc4 6.Nxc4 Bb7 7.Bg2 Be7 8. 0-0 0-0 9.Be3
Bd5 1 0 . Rc 1 Nc6 l l .Nfe5 Bxg2 1 2 . g2 Nxe5 1 3 . Nxe5 Nd5
1 4 . Bd2 f5= Rajkovic-I . Sokolov, Novi Sad 1 986.
b) 5 . Bg2 Bb7 6. 0-0 Be7 7.b3 0-0 8.Bb2 bxc4 9.bxc4 d6
1 0 . Nc3 Nbd7 l l . Qd3 Rb8 1 2 .Rab 1 Bxf3 1 3 . Bxf3 c5 14.e3 Qc7
1 5 .Rfc 1 Rb6 1 6 . Ba 1 Rfu8 17 . Bd1 Rxb1 18.Nxb1 e5 1 9 .Nd2 Qa5
20 . Qc2 Bf8 2 1 . Bc3 Qc7 22.dxe5 dxe5 23.Bf3 Qd6 24. Ne4 Qe6
2 5 . Qd3 Nxe4 26. Qxe4 Rb6 27.Rd1 Rd6 28.Rxd6 Qxd6 29.Kg2
g6 30 . Qd5 Qxd5 3 1 . Bxd5 Bd6 32.Bb7 Nb8 33.g4 f8 34.f3
Ke7 3 5 . Ke4 Nd7 36.g5 f5+ 37.gxf6+ Nxf6+ 38.f3 e4+ 39.Kg2
Ng4 40 . h3 Be5 4 1 .Ba5 Nf6 42.Bxa6 Ne8 43 . Bb7 Nd6 44. Bd5 g5
4 5 . Bb6 1-0 , Pekarek - nezevic, Prague, 1983.
see
Bogner-Shamkovich
in Mozny-Vehi
7 . 0-0 Be7
7 . . . c5!? is an interesting alternative . Villavicencio - Vehi
Bach, Spain Championship, 1989 continued 8.Nbd2 Na6 9.dxc5
Nxc5 10 .Nb3 Bd5 l l .Nfd4 Bxg2 1 2 .g2 Qb6 1 3 .g1 Be7
14.Nxc5 Qxc5 1 5 .Qd3 b4 16.Be3 Qd5 1 7. a3 bxa3 18.bxa3 Ra4
1 9 . Rfu 1 0-0 20.Rb5 Qa8 2 1 .Nc2 Rc8 22.Bd2 Ne4 2 3 .Bb4 Bxb4
24.Rxb4 d5 2 5 . Rab 1 h6 26.Rxa4 Qxa4 27.Ne3 Rc3 28. Rb8+ h7
72
73
29 . Qb1 Qxa3 30.g2 Qa6 3 1 . Qb2 Ra3 3 2 . Qc2 Rc3 3 3 . Qb2 Qd6
34.Nd1 Rc7 3 5 . Qb1 f5 36.Ra8 d4 37.Qb3 Qd5 01 .
8.Bg5 d6
8 ... 0-0= -ECO 1 992.
12.Rcl ;;!;;
-ECO 1 992 .
74
74
75
76
b) 6 . . . Nc6 7.Bg2
b1) 7 . . . Bc5 was played in Hansen,L - Novacan, Budapest,
1 989: 8.Nb3 Be7 9. Bf4 d6 10. Nd2 e5 l l . Bg5 Be6 1 2 .Bxf6 Bxf6
1 3 .Nd5 Be7 14.0-0 f5 1 5 .Nb1 0-0 16.Nbc3 Na5 1 7 . Qa4 Re8
1 8 . Rad1 Bf8 1 9 . Qb4 Rb8 20 .a4 Nc6 2 1 . Qa3 Na5 22.b3 h8
2 3 . Qa2 Rc8 24 . Rb1 g6 2 5 . Qd2 Bg8 26.Rfd1 e4 27.f4 Bg7 28.e3
h5 29. Bfl Bf7 30.Be2 h7 3 1 .g2 Re6 32.h3 Rc6 3 3 . Qa2 Rc8
34.g4 Nc6 3 5 . Qd2 Na5 36.Rdc 1 h6 37.Rg1 Nc6 38. Kh2 Ne7
39.Nxe7 Rxe7 40 .gxf5 gxf5 4 1 . Rg5 Bg6 42.Rbg1 Re6 43.Nd5
Qe8 44 .a5 Qf7 45.Bd1 Rg8 46.b4 Bf6 47.Nxf6 Rxf6 48. Bxh5 Rg7
49. Qf2 Qxc4 50. Qh4 Qc2+ 10 .
b2) Zysk - Marian, Fed. Rep . Germany, 1 985 continued
more prosaically with 7 . . . Qc7 8. 0-0 d6 9.b3 Bd7 1 0 . Bb2 Rd8
l l . Rc 1 Qb8 1 2 .Nxc6 Bxc6 1 3 . e4 Be7 14.Re 1 e5 1 5 .Nd5 Bxd5
1 6 . exd5 Nd7 17.c5 dxc5 18.f4 f6 19.fxe5 Nxe5 20.Bxe5 fxe5
2 1 . Qh5+ g6 22.Qxe5 Qxe5 23.Rxe5 Rf8 24.Rxc5 Rf7 2 5 . d6 Rxd6
26.Rc8+ Rd8 27. Bxb7 Rxc8 28. Bxc8 Rf6 29.Ra5 Bb4 30.Rxa6
Bc5+ 3 1 .Kg2 Rf2+ 32.h3 Rd2 33.Bg4 f7 34. Bf3 Bg1 3 5 . g4 g5
36.Ra5 Be3 37.Re5 Rxh2+ 38.h2 Bf4+ 39.Kg2 Bxe5 40. Bd5+
Ke7 41 .f3 Kd6 42.Ke4 Bb2 43 . Bg8 Kc5 1/z_llz.
6. cxb5
6. Bg2 bxc4 oo -Velimirovic, in Watson 1 988.
8 .N c 3 cxd4 9.Nxd4
9. Qxd4 Nc6 gives Black a strong initiative .
76
77
77
78
Chekhov - Zaichik
Berlin 1989
l.d4 Nf6 2.Nf3 e6 3.c4 a6 4.Bg5 h6
78
79
80
81
3 l ... Rh3
3 1 ... R8a7 wold have been a sensible precation.
36 ...Kg8
36 ... Ra4? 37. Qe8 Kg7 38. Rc8
4 1.Rb7 Re l
81
82
42.Kh2 Rfl
43.Rxb5
The connected passed
position of the White king.
pawns
are
balanced
by the
ft
/ t
'
ft t
-
h
..
82
83
E ingorn - Inkiov
Moscow 1986
l. d 4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nf3 a6 4.Nbd2
4 ... d5
4 ... c5 i s certainly more appropriate, since White's d-pawn
cannot advance. Typical hedgehogs are likely to arise.
84
8.cxd5 Nxd5 9.Nb3 ;;!; e5?!
This must have been the point of Black's move order, but
he is too far behind in development.
13.axb4 Nc6
84
Nxf4
1 5 . Bxc6+
Ke7
Adianto - Quinteros, 74
Agzamov - Inkiov, 27
-B
Balashov - Alburt, 59
Barnes - Issler, 78
Basin - Sagalchik, 79
Bemdorff-Aleksieva, 65
Blocker - Dzindzichashvili, 34
Boenscl1 - Teske, 31
Bogner-Shamkovich, 72
Browne - Dzindzichashvili, 37
Bus - Efimov, 65
C
Eingom - Inkiov, 88
F
Ftacnik - Fauland, 5 1
Furman - Tal, 54
-G
Garcia - Illescas, 42
Groszpeter - Ortega, 83
Gulko - Gurgenidze, 54
Hansen,L - Novacan, 79
Hemandez - Psakhis, 59
Huss - Lau, 18
Huzman-Yefimov, 61
-1-
Inkiov - Balashov, 64
Inkiov - Romanishin, 60
lonov - Mageamo, 78
K
l1aritonov - Gurgenidze, 55
Kohlweyer-Makropoulos, 72
raai - Gurevich,D, 84
-L
Langeweg - Ligterink, 68
Lemer - Gurgenidze, 43
Lukacs-Toskov,
Albena
1985, 8
--
Matamoros - Meetei, 5 1
Mirkovic-Efimov, 6 1
Moscow , 1986, 88
Mozny - Vehi Bacl1, 72
Muse - Miles, 68
N
Natamoros-Zaichik, 46
Naumkin - Kozlov, 14
Neverov - Zaichik, 1 2
Nickoloff-Benjamin, 80
Nikolic,N-Dizdarevic, 69
86
Razuvayev-Gutman, 56
Ribli - Ljubojevic, 78
Novikov - Zaichik, 83
-0-
-s
0dendahl - Alburt, 82
Oei - Ashley, Groningen, 55
Orr - Crouch, 60
Seirawan - Alburt, 83
Stempin - Fes Nielsen, 77
T
Pekarek - nezevic, 75
Petran-Forintos, 84
Petrosian - Nevednichy, 7
Pomar-Lengyel, 56
Portisch - Miles, 39
Tarjan - Alburt, 18
Torre - Bischoff, 60
Tukmakov - Zaichik, 55
V
-Q
Quraishi - Meetei, 40
Qvotrup-Yefimov, 60
-Z
R
Zysk - Marian, 79
Rajkovic-I.Sokolov, 75
86
$7.9 5
The Dzin l .d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3 . Nf3 a6 is a
refreshing and interesting alternative to the Queen' s
Indian Defense or Bogoindian, and it is an exciting
way to play as Blacl<. Honed into a sharp weapon by
Grandmasters Roman Dzindzichashvili and Lev
Alburt, it has had a very successful run in the
international tournament arena. In this bool< the
first devoted to the opening variation, ational
Master E ric Schiller provides a thorough
presentation of all of the relevant material the
opening. Over 5 0 complete games demonstrate the
leading ideas .
_ _