You are on page 1of 2

Federal Register / Vol. 71, No.

108 / Tuesday, June 6, 2006 / Proposed Rules 32491

The Proposed Amendment authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if flight data recorders (FDR) of a certain
requested in accordance with the procedures model. That action resulted from reports
Accordingly, under the authority found in 14 CFR 39.19.
delegated to me by the Administrator, of a number of incidents in which flight
(2) Before using any AMOC approved in data have been lost from the FDR.
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part accordance with § 39.19 on any airplane to
39 as follows: which the AMOC applies, notify the The proposed actions were intended
appropriate principal inspector in the FAA to prevent loss of flight data from the
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS Flight Standards Certificate Holding District FDR, which could hamper discovery of
DIRECTIVES Office. the cause of an accident, preventing the
Issued in Renton, Washington, on May 26, Federal Aviation Administration from
1. The authority citation for part 39
2006. developing and mandating actions to
continues to read as follows:
Jeffrey E. Duven, prevent additional accidents caused by
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. the same unsafe condition.
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
§ 39.13 [Amended] Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. Actions That Occurred Since the NPRM
2. The Federal Aviation [FR Doc. E6–8708 Filed 6–5–06; 8:45 am] Was Issued
Administration (FAA) amends § 39.13 BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
Since the issuance of that NPRM, the
by adding the following new
FDR manufacturer, L–3
airworthiness directive (AD):
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Communications Corporation, notified
Boeing: Docket No. FAA–2006–24952; the FAA that the only affected operator
Directorate Identifier 2006–NM–107–AD. flying in the U.S. has accomplished the
Federal Aviation Administration
Comments Due Date action proposed in the NPRM, and no
(a) The FAA must receive comments on 14 CFR Part 39 unsafe condition exists or is likely to
this AD action by July 21, 2006. exist. In the event that a Saab Model
[Docket No. 2001–NM–110–AD] SAAB-Fairchild SF340A (SAAB/
Affected ADs
RIN 2120–AA64 SF340A), or SAAB 340B airplane is
(b) None. imported into the U.S., the FAA issued
Applicability Airworthiness Directives; Saab Model a Special Airworthiness Information
(c) This AD applies to all Model 767–200, SAAB SF340A and SAAB 340B Series Bulletin (NM–06–40, April 14, 2006) to
–300, –300F, and –400ER series airplanes, Airplanes alert U.S. operators of the need to install
certificated in any category. the replacement FDR.
AGENCY: Federal Aviation
Unsafe Condition Administration, DOT. Explanation of Change to Model
(d) This AD results from a fire in the ACTION: Proposed rule; withdrawal. Designation
forward lower lobe cargo compartment found
We have revised the model reference
shortly after airplane arrival. We are issuing SUMMARY: This action withdraws a
this AD to detect and correct damage to wires in the above paragraph to identify
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
in the forward and aft lower lobe cargo model designations as published in the
that proposed a new airworthiness
compartments, which could result in a most recent type certificate data sheet
directive (AD), applicable to all Saab
potential short circuit and consequent fire in for the affected models.
the forward and aft lower lobe cargo
Model SAAB SF340A and SAAB 340B
compartments. series airplanes. That action would have FAA’s Conclusions
required modifying or replacing flight
Compliance Upon further consideration, the FAA
data recorders (FDR) of a certain model.
(e) You are responsible for having the
has determined that the actions that
Since the issuance of the NPRM, the
actions required by this AD performed within would have been required by the NPRM
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)
the compliance times specified, unless the have already been done on all affected
has received new data that the
actions have already been done. airplanes, and the identified unsafe
identified unsafe condition has been
condition has been corrected.
Repetitive Inspections and Corrective corrected on all airplanes that would
Actions if Applicable Accordingly, the proposed rule is
have been subject to the NPRM.
hereby withdrawn.
(f) Within 36 months after the effective Accordingly, the proposed rule is
date of this AD, do detailed inspections for withdrawn. Withdrawal of this NPRM constitutes
damage to the wire bundles, power drive unit only such action, and does not preclude
wiring, and wire attaching hardware, FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dan the agency from issuing another action
supports, and sleeving located in the forward Rodina, Aerospace Engineer, in the future, nor does it commit the
and aft lower lobe cargo compartments; and International Branch, ANM–116, agency to any course of action in the
do all applicable corrective actions before Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, future.
further flight after the inspections; by 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
accomplishing all of the actions specified in Washington 98055–4056; telephone Regulatory Impact
the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing (425) 227–2125; fax (425) 227–1149.
Service Bulletin 767–25–0376 (for Model Since this action only withdraws a
767–200, –300, and –300F series airplanes) or SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A notice of proposed rulemaking, it is
Boeing Service Bulletin 767–25–0377 (for proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal neither a proposed nor a final rule and
Model 767–400ER series airplanes), both Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to therefore is not covered under Executive
dated November 17, 2005, as applicable. add a new airworthiness directive (AD), Order 12866, the Regulatory Flexibility
Repeat the inspections thereafter at intervals applicable to all Saab Model SAAB Act, or DOT Regulatory Policies and
not to exceed 24,000 flight hours or 72
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSAL

SF340A and SAAB 340B series Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26,
months, whichever occurs first. airplanes, was published in the Federal 1979).
Alternative Methods of Compliance Register as a Notice of Proposed
(AMOCs)
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Rulemaking (NPRM) on August 17, 2001
(g)(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft (66 FR 43128). The proposed rule would Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the have required modifying or replacing safety, Safety.

VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:48 Jun 05, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\06JNP1.SGM 06JNP1
32492 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 6, 2006 / Proposed Rules

The Withdrawal Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC, the proposed AD. We are also inviting
Accordingly, the notice of proposed between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday comments, views, or arguments on the
rulemaking, Docket 2001–NM–110–AD, through Friday, except Federal holidays. new MCAI process. We will consider all
published in the Federal Register on For service information identified in comments received by the closing date
August 17, 2001 (66 FR 43128), is the proposed AD, contact the B–N and may amend the proposed AD in
withdrawn. Group Ltd, Bembridge Airport, Isle of light of those comments.
Wright, United Kingdom, PO35 5PR; We will post all comments we
Issued in Renton, Washington, on May 26, telephone: 0870 881 5064; facsimile:
2006. receive, without change, to http://
0870 881 5065; e-mail: dms.dot.gov, including any personal
Ali Bahrami, structural@britten-norman.com. information you provide. We will also
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Aircraft Certification Service. post a report summarizing each
Taylor Martin, Aerospace Safety substantive verbal contact we receive
[FR Doc. E6–8710 Filed 6–5–06; 8:45 am] Engineer, FAA, Small Airplane concerning this proposed AD.
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301,
Kansas City, Missouri 64106; telephone: Discussion
(816) 329–4138; facsimile: (816) 329–
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION The Civil Aviation Authority (CAA),
4090.
which is the airworthiness authority for
Federal Aviation Administration SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: the United Kingdom, has issued British
Streamlined Issuance of AD Airworthiness Directive No. G–2004–
14 CFR Part 39 0011, dated May 25, 2004 (referred to
The FAA is implementing a new after this as ‘‘the MCAI’’), to correct an
[Docket No. FAA–2005–22420; Directorate process for streamlining the issuance of
Identifier 2005–CE–47–AD] unsafe condition for the specified
ADs related to MCAI. We are products. The MCAI states that that the
RIN 2120–AA64 prototyping this process and specifically aircraft manufacturer has identified
request your comments on its use. This several cases of corroded elevator final
Airworthiness Directives; B–N Group streamlined process will allow us to drive control rods. If not corrected
Ltd. BN–2, BN–2A, BN–2B, BN–2T, and adopt MCAI safety requirements in a corrosion of the interior surface could
BN–2T–4R Series (All Individual more efficient manner and will reduce result in failure or collapse of the rod,
Models Included in Type Certificate safety risks to the public. resulting in loss of control or jamming
Data Sheet (TCDS) A17EU, Revision This process continues to follow all of the elevator system. The MCAI
16, Dated December 9, 2002) Airplanes existing AD issuance processes to meet requires an inspection of the internal
legal, economic, Administrative surface of the elevator system final drive
AGENCY: Federal Aviation
Procedure Act, and Federal Register control rod and replacement if found
Administration (FAA), Department of
requirements. We also continue to corroded. You may obtain further
Transportation (DOT).
follow our technical decision-making information by examining the MCAI in
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking processes in all aspects to meet our the docket.
(NPRM). responsibilities to determine and correct
unsafe conditions on U.S.-certificated Relevant Service Information
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for the products.
This proposed AD references the BN-Group Ltd. has issued Britten-
products listed above. This proposed Norman Service Bulletin SB number
MCAI and related service information
AD results from mandatory continuing 303, Issue 1, dated May 14, 2004. The
that we considered in forming the
airworthiness information (MCAI) actions described in this service
engineering basis to correct the unsafe
issued by an airworthiness authority of information are intended to correct the
condition. The proposed AD contains
another country. The proposed AD unsafe condition identified in the
text copied from the MCAI and for this
would require actions that are intended MCAI.
reason might not follow our plain
to address an unsafe condition
language principles. FAA’s Determination and Requirements
described in the MCAI.
The comment period for this of the Proposed AD
DATES: We must receive comments on proposed AD is open for 15 days. The
this proposed AD by June 21, 2006. comment period is reduced because the This product is manufactured outside
ADDRESSES: Use one of the following airworthiness authority and the United States and is type certificated
addresses to comment on this proposed manufacturer have already published for operation in the United States under
AD: the documents on which we based our the provisions of section 21.29 of the
• DOT Docket Web site: Go to decision, making a longer comment Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR
http://dms.dot.gov and follow the period unnecessary. 21.29) and the applicable bilateral
instructions for sending your comments agreement. Pursuant to this bilateral
electronically. Comments Invited airworthiness agreement, the State of
• Government-wide rulemaking Web We invite you to send any written Design’s airworthiness authority has
site: Go to http://www.regulations.gov data, views, or arguments regarding this notified us of the unsafe condition
and follow the instructions for sending proposed AD. Send your comments to described in the MCAI and service
your comments electronically. an address listed under the ADDRESSES information referenced above. We have
• Mail: Docket Management Facility; section. Include the docket number, examined the airworthiness authority’s
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSAL

U.S. Department of Transportation, 400 Docket No. FAA–2005–22420; findings, evaluated all pertinent
Seventh Street, SW., Nassif Building, Directorate Identifier 2005–CE–47–AD information, and determined an unsafe
Room PL–401, Washington, DC 20590. at the beginning of your comments. We condition exists and is likely to exist or
• Fax: (202) 493–2251. specifically invite comments on the develop on all products of this type
• Hand delivery: Room PL–401 on the overall regulatory, economic, design. We are issuing this proposed AD
plaza level of the Nassif Building, 400 environmental, and energy aspects of to correct the unsafe condition.

VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:48 Jun 05, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\06JNP1.SGM 06JNP1

You might also like