You are on page 1of 2

15374 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No.

59 / Tuesday, March 28, 2006 / Notices

36 CFR Parts 215 or 217. Additionally, environmental organizations, inholders 74920 NE. Stevens Pass Highway, P.O.
pursuant to 7 CFR 1.27(d), any person in Opal Creek Scenic Recreation Area, Box 305, Skykomish, WA 98288 (phone:
may request the agency to withhold a economic development, Indian tribes, 360–677–2414).
submission from the public record by adjacent landowners and recreation SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: All
showing how the Freedom of interests. The council provides advice to Snohomish County RAC meetings are
Information Act (FOIA) permits such the Secretary of Agriculture on open to the public. Interested citizens
confidentiality. Requesters should be preparation of a comprehensive Opal are encouraged to attend. The
aware that, under FOIA, confidentiality Creek Management Plan for the SRA, Snohomish County RAC reviews project
may be granted in only very limited and consults on a periodic and regular proposals, and makes recommendations
circumstances, such as to protect trade basis on the management of the are. to the Forest Supervisor for projects to
secrets. The Forest Service will inform Tentative agenda items include new be funded by Title II dollars, under
the requester of the agency’s decision advisory council member introductions, Public Law 106–393, H.R. 2389, The
regarding the request for confidentiality, roles and responsibilities, current Secure Rural Schools and Community
and where the request is denied, the project updates and future projects. Self-Determination Act of 2000, also
agency will return the submission and A direct public comment period is called the ‘‘Payments to States’’ Act.
notify the requester that the comments tentatively scheduled to begin at 8 p.m.
Dated: March 21, 2006.
may be resubmitted with or without Time allotted for individual
Allen Gibbs,
name and address within 7 days. presentations will be limited to 3
No outside permits or licenses are minutes. Written comments are Acting Designated Federal Official.
required to implement the proposed encouraged, particularly if the material [FR Doc. 06–2956 Filed 3–27–06; 8:45 am]
action. Responsible Official: The cannot be presented within the time BILLING CODE 3410–11–M
Tongass Forest Supervisor, 648 Mission limits of the comments period. Written
Street, Ketchikan, AK, 99901, is the comments may be submitted prior to the
responsible official. The responsible April 27th by sending them to DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
official will consider the comments, Designated Federal Official Paul Matter
response, disclosure of environmental Forest Service
at the address given below.
consequences, and applicable laws, FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For South Mt. Baker-Snoqualmie Resource
regulations, and policies in making the more information regarding this Advisory Committee (RAC)
decision and stating the rationale in the meeting, contact Designated Federal
Record of Decision. Official Paul Matter; Williamette AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.
Dated: March 20, 2006. National Forest, Detroit Ranger District, ACTION: Notice of meetings.
Forrest Cole, HC 73 Box 320, Mill City, OR 97360;
SUMMARY: The South Mt. Baker-
Forest Supervisor. (503) 854–3366.
Snoqualmie Resource Advisory
[FR Doc. 06–2952 Filed 3–27–06; 8:45 am] Dated: March 21, 2006. Committee (RAC) will meet at the
BILLING CODE 3410–11–M Dallas J. Emch, Snoqualmie Ranger District Office in
Forest Supervisor. North Bend, WA to review and select
[FR Doc. 06–2955 Filed 3–27–06; 8:45 am] Title II projects for FY 2007.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE BILLING CODE 3410–11–M DATES: Thursday, May 4, 2006, from 9
Forest Service a.m. until 4 p.m.
ADDRESSES: Snoqualmie Ranger District,
Opal Creek Scenic Recreation Area DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE North Bend Office, 42404 SE North
(SRA) Advisory Council Bend Way, North Bend, WA 98045.
Forest Service
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jim
AGENCY: Forest, USDA Forest Service.
Snohomish County Resource Advisory Franzel, Designated Federal Official,
ACTION: Notice of Meeting.
Committee (RAC) USDA Forest Service, Mt. Baker-
SUMMARY: An Opal Creek Scenic Snoqualmie National Forest,
AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA. Snoqualmie Ranger District, 42404 SE
Recreation Area Advisory Council
meeting will convene in Stayton, ACTION: Notice of meetings. North Bend Way, WA 98045–0545
Oregon on Thursday, April 27, 2006. (phone 425–888–1421, Extension 230),
SUMMARY: The Snohomish County or Penny Sundblad, Management
The meeting is scheduled to begin at Resource Advisory Committee (RAC)
6:30 p.m., and will conclude at Specialist, USDA Forest Service, Mt.
will meet at the Snohomish County Baker-Snoqualmie National Forest, 810
approximately 8:30 p.m. The meeting Administration Building in Everett,
will be held in the South Room of the State Route 20, Sedro Wooley,
Washington to review and recommend Washington 98284 (360–856–5700).
Stayton Community Center located on Title II projects for FY 2007.
400 West Virginia Street in Stayton, SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: All South
DATES: Tuesday, April 11, 2006 (if Mt. Baker-Snoqualmie RAC meetings
Oregon.
The Opal Creek Wilderness and Opal needed) and Thursday, April 20, 2006. are open to the public. Interested
Creek Scenic Recreation Area Act of Both meetings will be from 9 a.m. until citizens are encouraged to attend. The
1996 (Opal Creek Act) (Pub. L. 104–208) 4 p.m. South Mt. Baker-Snoqualmie RAC
directed the Secretary of Agriculture to ADDRESSES: Snohomish County reviews project proposals, and makes
establish the Opal Creek Scenic Administration Building, Willis Tucker recommendations to the Forest
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES

Recreation Area Advisory Council. The Conference Room (third floor), 3000 Supervisor for projects to be funded by
Advisory Council is comprised of Rockefeller Ave. in Everett, WA 98201. Title II dollars, under Public Law 106–
thirteen members representing state, FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 393, H.R. 2389, The Secure Rural
county and city governments, and Barbara Busse, Designated Federal Schools and Community Self-
representatives of various organizations, Official, USDA Forest Service, Mt. Determination Act of 2000, also called
which include mining industry, Baker-Snoqualmie National Forest, the ‘‘Payments to States’’ Act.

VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:19 Mar 27, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\28MRN1.SGM 28MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 59 / Tuesday, March 28, 2006 / Notices 15375

Dated: March 21, 2006. hot–or cold–rolled, drawn, extruded, that revocation of the CVD order would
Allen Gibbs, formed or finished, having at least one be likely to lead to continuation or
Acting Designated Federal Official. dimension of at least 80 mm (3.2 inches recurrence of a countervailable subsidy,
[FR Doc. 06–2957 Filed 3–27–06; 8:45 am] or more), whether of carbon or alloy and notified the ITC of the level of
BILLING CODE 3410–11–M (other than stainless) steel, and whether subsidy likely to prevail were the order
or not drilled, punched, notched, to be revoked. See Final Results of
painted, coated, or clad. These products Expedited Sunset Review of the
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE include, but are not limited to, wide– Countervailing Duty Order: Structural
flange beams (W shapes), bearing piles Steel Beams from South Korea, 70 FR
International Trade Administration (HP shapes), standard beams (S or I 53167 (September 7, 2005). As a result
shapes), and M–shapes. of its AD sunset reviews, the
(A–588–852, A–580–841, C–580–842) Department found that revocation of the
All products that meet the physical
and metallurgical descriptions provided AD orders would be likely to lead to
Revocation of Antidumping and
above are within the scope of these continuation or recurrence of dumping,
Countervailing Duty Orders: Structural
orders unless otherwise excluded. The and notified the ITC of the magnitude of
Steel Beams From Japan and South
following products are outside and/or the margin likely to prevail were the
Korea
specifically excluded from the scope of orders to be revoked. See Structural
AGENCY: Import Administration, these orders: Structural steel beams Steel Beams from Japan and South
International Trade Administration, greater than 400 pounds per linear foot Korea; Final Results of Expedited Sunset
Department of Commerce. or with a web or section height (also Reviews of Antidumping Duty Orders,
SUMMARY: On May 2, 2005, the known as depth) over 40 inches. 70 FR 53633 (September 9, 2005). On
Department of Commerce (‘‘the The products subject to these orders March 15, 2006, the ITC determined,
Department’’) initiated its sunset are currently classifiable in the pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act,
reviews of the antidumping duty (‘‘AD’’) Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the that revocation of the AD orders on
orders on structural steel beams United States (‘‘HTSUS’’) at beams from Japan and Korea, and the
(‘‘beams’’) from Japan and South Korea subheadings: 7216.32.0000, CVD order on beams from Korea would
(‘‘Korea’’), and the countervailing duty 7216.33.0030, 7216.33.0060, not be likely to lead to continuation or
(‘‘CVD’’) order on beams from Korea. 7216.33.0090, 7216.50.0000, recurrence of material injury to an
See Initiation of Five-year (‘‘Sunset’’) 7216.61.0000, 7216.69.0000, industry in the United States within a
Reviews, 70 FR 22632 (May 2, 2005). 7216.91.0000,1 7216.99.0000,2 reasonably foreseeable time. See
Pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff 7228.70.3040,3 7228.70.6000. Although Structural Steel Beams from Japan and
Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’), the the HTSUS subheadings are provided Korea, 71 FR 13431 (March 15, 2006)
International Trade Commission (‘‘the for convenience and customs purposes, and USITC Publication 3840 (March
ITC’’), in its sunset reviews, determined the written description of the 2006), entitled Structural Steel Beams
that revocation of the AD orders on merchandise in these orders is from Japan and Korea (Inv. Nos. 701–
beams from Japan and Korea and the dispositive. TA–401 and 731–TA–853–854
CVD order on beams from Korea would (Review)).
not be likely to lead to continuation or Background
Determination
recurrence of material injury to an On June 19, August 18, and August
industry in the United States within a As a result of the determination by the
14, 2000, the Department issued the AD
reasonably foreseeable time. See ITC that revocation of these AD and
orders on beams from Japan and Korea
Structural Steel Beams from Japan and CVD orders is not likely to lead to
and the CVD order on beams from
Korea, 71 FR 13431 (March 15, 2006). continuation or recurrence of material
Korea, respectively. See Structural Steel
Therefore, pursuant to section 751(d)(2) injury to an industry in the United
Beams from Japan: Notice of
of the Act and 19 CFR 351.222(i)(1)(iii), States, the Department, pursuant to
Antidumping Duty Order, 65 FR 37960
the Department is revoking the AD section 751(d) of the Act, is revoking the
(June 19, 2000), Structural Steel Beams
orders on beams from Japan and Korea AD orders on beams from Japan and
From South Korea: Notice of
Korea and the CVD order on beams from
and the CVD order on beams from Antidumping Duty Order, 65 FR 50502
Korea. Pursuant to section 751(d)(2) of
Korea. (August 18, 2000), and Notice of the Act and 19 CFR 351.222(i)(2)(i), the
EFFECTIVE DATE: June 19, 2005 - Japan; Countervailing Duty Order: Structural effective date of revocation is June 19,
August 14, 2005 - Korea (CVD); August Steel Beams from the Republic of Korea, 2005, August 18, 2005, and August 14,
18, 2005 - Korea (AD). 65 FR 49542 (August 14, 2000). On May 2005 (i.e., the fifth anniversary of the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 2, 2005, the Department initiated, and date of publication in the Federal
Robert James or Dana Mermelstein (AD the ITC instituted, sunset reviews of the Register of the notices of the AD order
orders), Tipten Troidl or Brandon AD and CVD orders on beams from on Japan, the AD order on Korea, and
Farlander (CVD order), AD/CVD Japan and Korea. See Initiation of Five- the CVD order on Korea, respectively).
Operations, Import Administration, year (‘‘Sunset’’) Reviews, 70 FR 22632 The Department will notify U.S.
International Trade Administration, (May 2, 2005). As a result of its CVD Customs and Border Protection to
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th sunset review, the Department found discontinue suspension of liquidation
Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, 1 HTSUS subheading 7216.91.0000 was no longer
and collection of cash deposits on
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) in use as of 2004, and was replaced by 7216.91.0010
entries of the subject merchandise
482–0649, (202) 482–1391, (202) 482 - entered or withdrawn from warehouse
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES

and 7216.91.0090 in that year.


1767 or (202) 482–0182, respectively. 2 HTSUS subheading 7216.99.0000 was no longer on or after June 19, 2005, August 18,
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: in use as of 2004, and was replaced by 7216.99.0010 2005, and August 14, 2005, the effective
and 7216.99.0090 in that year. dates of revocation of the AD orders and
Scope of the Orders 3 HTSUS subheading 7228.70.3040 was no longer
the CVD order. The Department will
in use as of 2005. What was previously covered by
The products covered by these orders that number is covered within 7228.70.3010 and complete any pending administrative
are doubly–symmetric shapes, whether 7228.70.3041 starting in 2005. reviews of these orders and will conduct

VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:19 Mar 27, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\28MRN1.SGM 28MRN1

You might also like