Professional Documents
Culture Documents
* * * * * * *
Documents Incorporated by Reference Statewide ............... 8/25/05 3/3/06 [Insert page State effective date is 2/1/00.
(9 VAC 5–20–21, Sections D., E. (in- number where
troductory sentence), E.2 (all para- the document be-
graphs), E.3.b, E.4.a.(1) and (2), gins].
E.4.b., E.5. (all paragraphs), and E.7.
(all paragraphs)).
Documents Incorporated by Reference Statewide ............... 10/25/05 3/3/06 [Insert page State effective is 3/9/05; approval is for
(9 VAC 5–20–21, Section B). number where those provisions of the CFR which
the document be- implement control programs for air
gins]. pollutants related to the national am-
bient air quality standards (NAAQS)
and regional haze.
* * * * * * *
[FR Doc. 06–1943 Filed 3–2–06; 8:45 am] form. Publicly available docket nitrogen dioxide, and lead to make the
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P materials are available either state regulation consistent with 40 CFR
electronically through part 50.
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy for Other specific requirements of
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION public inspection during normal Regulation 9 VAC 5 Chapter 30 and the
AGENCY business hours at the Air Protection rationale for EPA’s proposed action are
Division, U.S. Environmental Protection explained in the NPR and will not be
40 CFR Part 52 Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch Street, restated here. No public comments were
[EPA–R03–OAR–2005–VA–0016; FRL–8040– Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. received on the NPR.
1] Copies of the State submittal are III. General Information Pertaining to
available at the Virginia Department of SIP Submittals From the
Approval and Promulgation of Air Environmental Quality, 629 East Main Commonwealth of Virginia
Quality Implementation Plans; Virginia; Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219.
Amendments to the Ambient Air In 1995, Virginia adopted legislation
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rose
Quality Standards that provides, subject to certain
Quinto, (215) 814–2182, or by e-mail at conditions, for an environmental
AGENCY: Environmental Protection quinto.rose@epa.gov. assessment (audit) ‘‘privilege’’ for
Agency (EPA). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: voluntary compliance evaluations
ACTION: Final rule. performed by a regulated entity. The
I. Background
legislation further addresses the relative
SUMMARY: EPA is approving a State On January 6, 2006 (71 FR 892), EPA burden of proof for parties either
Implementation Plan (SIP) revision published a notice of proposed asserting the privilege or seeking
submitted by the Commonwealth of rulemaking (NPR) for the disclosure of documents for which the
Virginia. This revision pertains to the Commonwealth of Virginia. The NPR privilege is claimed. Virginia’s
amendments of the Commonwealth’s proposed approval of the amendments legislation also provides, subject to
existing ambient air quality standards. to the Commonwealth’s existing certain conditions, for a penalty waiver
EPA is approving this SIP revision in ambient air quality standards, 9 VAC 5 for violations of environmental laws
accordance with the Clean Air Act (CAA Chapter 30. The formal SIP revision was when a regulated entity discovers such
or Act). submitted by the Virginia Department of violations pursuant to a voluntary
EFFECTIVE DATE: This final rule is Environmental Quality (VADEQ) on compliance evaluation and voluntarily
effective on April 3, 2006. September 26, 2005. discloses such violations to the
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a Commonwealth and takes prompt and
docket for this action under Docket ID II. Summary of SIP Revision
appropriate measures to remedy the
Number EPA–R03–OAR–2005–VA– The Commonwealth’s SIP revision violations. Virginia’s Voluntary
0016. All documents in the docket are incorporates the 1997 national ambient Environmental Assessment Privilege
listed in the www.regulations.gov air quality standards (NAAQS) for the 8- Law, Va. Code Sec. 10.1–1198, provides
website. Although listed in the hour ozone and PM2.5 into the Virginia a privilege that protects from disclosure
electronic docket, some information is Regulations for the Control and documents and information about the
not publicly available, i.e., confidential Abatement of Air Pollution: 9 VAC 5 content of those documents that are the
business information (CBI) or other Chapter 30, Ambient Air Quality product of a voluntary environmental
information whose disclosure is Standards. The other SIP revisions assessment. The Privilege Law does not
wwhite on PROD1PC65 with RULES
restricted by statute. Certain other incorporated into 9 VAC 5 Chapter 30, extend to documents or information (1)
material, such as copyrighted material, are amendments to the ambient air that are generated or developed before
is not placed on the Internet and will be quality standards for sulfur dioxide, the commencement of a voluntary
publicly available only in hard copy carbon monoxide, ozone (1-hour), PM10, environmental assessment; (2) that are
VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:36 Mar 02, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\03MRR1.SGM 03MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 42 / Friday, March 3, 2006 / Rules and Regulations 10843
prepared independently of the of the Clean Air Act is likewise not subject to Executive Order 13045
assessment process; (3) that demonstrate unaffected by this, or any, state audit ‘‘Protection of Children from
a clear, imminent and substantial privilege or immunity law. Environmental Health Risks and Safety
danger to the public health or Risks’’ (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997),
IV. Final Action
environment; or (4) that are required by because it is not economically
law. EPA is approving the amendments to significant.
On January 12, 1998, the the existing air quality standards, 9 VAC In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA’s
Commonwealth of Virginia Office of the 5 Chapter 30, as a revision to the role is to approve state choices,
Attorney General provided a legal Virginia SIP submitted on September provided that they meet the criteria of
opinion that states that the Privilege 26, 2005. the Clean Air Act. In this context, in the
law, Va. Code Sec. 10.1–1198, precludes absence of a prior existing requirement
V. Statutory and Executive Order
granting a privilege to documents and for the State to use voluntary consensus
Reviews
information ‘‘required by law,’’ standards (VCS), EPA has no authority
including documents and information A. General Requirements to disapprove a SIP submission for
‘‘required by Federal law to maintain Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR failure to use VCS. It would thus be
program delegation, authorization or 51735, October 4, 1993), this action is inconsistent with applicable law for
approval,’’ since Virginia must ‘‘enforce not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ and EPA, when it reviews a SIP submission,
Federally authorized environmental therefore is not subject to review by the to use VCS in place of a SIP submission
programs in a manner that is no less Office of Management and Budget. For that otherwise satisfies the provisions of
stringent than their Federal the Clean Air Act. Thus, the
this reason, this action is also not
counterparts* * *.’’ The opinion requirements of section 12(d) of the
subject to Executive Order 13211,
concludes that ‘‘[r]egarding § 10.1–1198, National Technology Transfer and
‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations That
therefore, documents or other Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C.
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
information needed for civil or criminal 272 note) do not apply. This rule does
Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355, May
enforcement under one of these not impose an information collection
22, 2001). This action merely approves
programs could not be privileged burden under the provisions of the
state law as meeting Federal
because such documents and Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
requirements and imposes no additional
information are essential to pursuing U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
requirements beyond those imposed by
enforcement in a manner required by
Federal law to maintain program state law. Accordingly, the B. Submission to Congress and the
delegation, authorization or approval.’’ Administrator certifies that this rule Comptroller General
Virginia’s Immunity law, Va. Code will not have a significant economic
Sec. 10.1–1199, provides that ‘‘[t]o the impact on a substantial number of small The Congressional Review Act, 5
extent consistent with requirements entities under the Regulatory Flexibility U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
imposed by Federal law,’’ any person Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this Business Regulatory Enforcement
making a voluntary disclosure of rule approves pre-existing requirements Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
information to a state agency regarding under state law and does not impose that before a rule may take effect, the
a violation of an environmental statute, any additional enforceable duty beyond agency promulgating the rule must
regulation, permit, or administrative that required by state law, it does not submit a rule report, which includes a
order is granted immunity from contain any unfunded mandate or copy of the rule, to each House of the
administrative or civil penalty. The significantly or uniquely affect small Congress and to the Comptroller General
Attorney General’s January 12, 1998 governments, as described in the of the United States. EPA will submit a
opinion states that the quoted language Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 report containing this rule and other
renders this statute inapplicable to (Pub. L. 104–4). This rule also does not required information to the U.S. Senate,
enforcement of any Federally authorized have tribal implications because it will the U.S. House of Representatives, and
programs, since ‘‘no immunity could be not have a substantial direct effect on the Comptroller General of the United
afforded from administrative, civil, or one or more Indian tribes, on the States prior to publication of the rule in
criminal penalties because granting relationship between the Federal the Federal Register. This rule is not a
such immunity would not be consistent Government and Indian tribes, or on the ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C.
with Federal law, which is one of the distribution of power and 804(2).
criteria for immunity.’’ responsibilities between the Federal C. Petitions for Judicial Review
Therefore, EPA has determined that Government and Indian tribes, as
Virginia’s Privilege and Immunity specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
statutes will not preclude the FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
Commonwealth from enforcing its action also does not have Federalism this action must be filed in the United
program consistent with the Federal implications because it does not have States Court of Appeals for the
requirements. In any event, because substantial direct effects on the States, appropriate circuit by May 2, 2006.
EPA has also determined that a state on the relationship between the national Filing a petition for reconsideration by
audit privilege and immunity law can government and the States, or on the the Administrator of this final rule does
affect only state enforcement and cannot distribution of power and not affect the finality of this rule for the
have any impact on Federal responsibilities among the various purposes of judicial review nor does it
enforcement authorities, EPA may at levels of government, as specified in extend the time within which a petition
any time invoke its authority under the Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, for judicial review may be filed, and
Clean Air Act, including, for example, August 10, 1999). This action merely shall not postpone the effectiveness of
sections 113, 167, 205, 211 or 213, to approves a state rule implementing a such rule or action.
wwhite on PROD1PC65 with RULES
enforce the requirements or prohibitions Federal requirement, and does not alter This action pertaining to the
of the state plan, independently of any the relationship or the distribution of amendments of Virginia’s ambient air
state enforcement effort. In addition, power and responsibilities established quality standards, may not be
citizen enforcement under section 304 in the Clean Air Act. This rule also is challenged later in proceedings to
VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:36 Mar 02, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\03MRR1.SGM 03MRR1
10844 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 42 / Friday, March 3, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
enforce its requirements. (See section Dated: February 22, 2006. Subpart VV—Virginia
307(b)(2).) William Early,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III. ■ 2. In § 52.2420, the table in paragraph
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
■ 40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows: (c) is amended by revising the entries
Environmental protection, Carbon for Chapter 30 to read as follows:
monoxide, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, PART 52—[AMENDED]
§ 52.2420 Identification of plan.
Particulate matter, Sulfur oxides,
■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 * * * * *
Volatile organic compounds.
continues to read as follows:
(c) * * *
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
* * * * * * *
Chapter 30 Ambient Air Quality Standards [Part III]
* * * * * * *
VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:36 Mar 02, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\03MRR1.SGM 03MRR1