Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Page 1 of 10
HOME
GENERAL INTEREST
EXPLORATION &
DEVELOPMENT
DRILLING & PRODUCTION
REFINING
& PROCESSING
Home
Gas
heated reforming improves Fischer-Tropsch process
PIPELINES &
TRANSPORTATION
OGJ RESOURCES
An AGHR and secondary reformer was installed at the Coogee Energy methanol plant,
Melbourne. Photo courtesy of Synetix.
Click here to enlarge image
The two reformers can be linked in different ways; the configuration in which feed gas
passes through the GHR and ATR in series gives the best benefits.
Synetix, in partnership with Methanex Corp., the world's largest producer of methanol,
has constructed a materials demonstration unit (MDU) in New Zealand to establish the
benefits of combining GHR with ATR.
Engineering work on the project started in mid-2000, and the units were commissioned
in Feb 2002. Preliminary results will be available later in 2002 with final results in 2003.
http://www.ogj.com/articles/print/volume-100/issue-16/processing/gas-heated-reformi... 16.06.2015
Gas heated reforming improves Fischer-Tropsch process - Oil & Gas Journal
Page 2 of 10
An important objective when making syngas feed for Fischer-Tropsch (FT) liquids
production is to synthesize a gas composition in which the H2:CO ratio= 2:1. This is the
approximate ratio in which these reactants are consumed.
Autothermal reforming
Currently, the most widely proposed syngas technology for GTL production is ATR.
There are many variants of this basic process, some incorporating proprietary
technology. All the processes, however, involve the partial oxidation of natural gas with
steam and oxygen, or air, followed by equilibration over a catalyst bed (Fig. 1).
These catalytic processes have more ideal syngas stoichiometry for FT synthesis and
With ATR, the feed gas and steam mixture is preheated, combusted with an oxidant,
and passed over a catalyst to bring the steam-methane reforming reaction to
17 Std.
combusted to heat the gases and steam reform them to equilibrium at 1,920 F. This
satisfies the ATR molar reaction and adiabatic heat balance according to Eq. 1 (see
Equation box).
This gives a syngas that is too lean in CO (H2:CO = 2.19) since CO2 is not reactive for
FT. The CO2 can be recycled to the ATR, which will enable the correct syngas H2:CO
The balance in Eq. 2 shows that there is a fundamental, inherent process inefficiency.
CAREERS AT TOTAL
For every 100 units of carbon in the feed, 9 units of carbon must be discarded to
GHR was first developed by Synetix in the mid 1980s and has been in continuous
operation in ammonia and methanol plants since 1988. In the 1990s, Synetix
developed the advanced gas heated reformer (AGHR) with a simplified, lower-cost
design and the ability to scale up to the sizes required for world-scale GTL plants.
Combining the oxygen-fired reformer with a GHR can substantially improve the
performance of a GTL plant using oxygen-based reforming.1 The GHR recycles highgrade heat from the reformed gas directly back into the reforming process. This
reduces the oxygen requirement and eliminates the need to generate large quantities
of high-pressure steam from the process train. Fig. 2 shows this configuration.
http://www.ogj.com/articles/print/volume-100/issue-16/processing/gas-heated-reformi... 16.06.2015
Gas heated reforming improves Fischer-Tropsch process - Oil & Gas Journal
Page 3 of 10
With the same basis as the preceding ATR example (natural gas composition, steam
ratio, ATR and secondary exit temperature), 18% less oxygen combustion is needed to
satisfy the heat balance and less hydrogen is consumed, leaving more available for FT
liquid synthesis.
Eq. 3 shows that the scheme is now well balanced-for every 100 units of feed carbon,
only 2 units of carbon must be purged, and reaction efficiency to CO improves nearly
8%. This will boost the overall carbon efficiency of a GTL plant.2
Economic benefits
Table 1 summarizes the results of a study based on a light natural gas feedstock. The
GHR-based process operating at a steam ratio (SR) of 2.0 achieves 5% lower total
energy consumption than POX or ATR. If we lower the SR to less than 1.0, energy
consumption improves by up to 10%.
The maximum efficiency improvement (and the SR at which it occurs) depends on
many factors, such as feed composition, FT conversion and selectivity, LPG recovery,
etc. The optimum is a balance between the feed and fuel requirements for natural gas;
the optimum may be at an intermediate SR.
We configured all the processes for zero power export-any heat that could not be used
in the process was rejected in flue gas or used for air or water cooling. Table 1 also
shows the substantial reductions in oxygen requirement and CO2 emissions.
Capital costs
GHR has lower capital costs compared to competing processes. GHR simplifies the
flowsheet, eliminating some systems and reducing the size and cost of others,
especially regarding utilities. The main benefits are:
http://www.ogj.com/articles/print/volume-100/issue-16/processing/gas-heated-reformi... 16.06.2015
Gas heated reforming improves Fischer-Tropsch process - Oil & Gas Journal
Page 4 of 10
At an SR of 2.0, capital cost is the same as the ATR-based process (at an SR of 0.6)
and about 5% lower than for a POX-based system. At lower SRs, the capital cost
savings are more than 10% for a complete GTL facility. Table 2 shows typical savings.
Different GHR configurations
There are various options for coupling a GHR with an oxygen-fired reformer. They
require different process and mechanical design considerations and have different
overall effects on GTL process performance.
In Lineup A (Fig. 2), the GHR and oxygen-based reformer (secondary reformer) are in
series. GHR catalyst tube bottoms are sealed within a tubesheet to prevent methane
leakage into the syngas product. This is the design of the Synetix AGHR.
In Lineup B (Fig. 3), the natural gas and steam mixture is split and fed to the GHR and
ATR, which operate in parallel. The GHR catalyst tubes are open ended. The two
reformed gas streams mix in the GHR shell before they provide heat to reform the gas
in the GHR.
Lineup C (Fig. 4) has a similar parallel configuration to Lineup B. The difference is that
that the two reformed gas streams do not mix in the GHR. Syngas from the GHR
catalyst is cooled separately in bayonet tubes that are within the annular catalyst beds
in each outer tube.
The relative effect that these lineups have on the FT production process, as well as the
comparative size of GHR needed for each duty, can be simulated for different
reforming conditions.
http://www.ogj.com/articles/print/volume-100/issue-16/processing/gas-heated-reformi... 16.06.2015
Gas heated reforming improves Fischer-Tropsch process - Oil & Gas Journal
Page 5 of 10
The GHR catalyst exit temperature is a key process parameter. It determines the
reduction in oxygen flow compared to a standalone ATR. It also influences the GHR's
size, because the GHR is simply a heat exchanger with catalyst in the tubes-the higher
the tube exit temperature, the lower the temperature differential driving heat transfer.
Due to less gas passing through the catalyst, Lineups B and C can have a lower
pressure drop than Lineup A. Therefore, they must have a higher GHR exit catalyst
temperature to keep the levels of unreacted methane acceptably low.
Table 3 and Fig. 5 show a comparison between these schemes. In process terms,
Lineups B and C are identical. An important differentiator between these lineups is the
total concentration of CH4, CO2, N2, and Ar in the syngas product. These gases are
inert in FT synthesis-the higher the inerts level, the worse the FT gas quality.
Even with GHR catalyst exit temperatures up to 1,650 F., the total inerts level is still
much higher in the parallel lineups than the series configuration. This results in lower
process efficiency and an increased requirement for syngas and oxygen production.
Lineups B and C show the same upward trend in heat transfer area (HTA) with
increasing catalyst (or tube) exit temperature. If the tube exit temperature is 1,560 F.
(process performance not competitive with lineup A), the equipment size will tend to be
the same or larger. At 1,650 F., there is still a 5% efficiency penalty, and the HTA
requirements are more than twice those of the series arrangement.
Altering other variables-such as splitting steam between the GHR and ATR, or
considering a GHR in combination with a non-catalytic partial oxidation reactor rather
than an ATR-can result in minor improvements compared to the parallel schemes, but
they do not affect the overall results.
The materials demonstration unit for GHR and secondaries is in New Plymouth, New
Zealand. Photo courtesy of Synetix.
Click here to enlarge image
http://www.ogj.com/articles/print/volume-100/issue-16/processing/gas-heated-reformi... 16.06.2015
Gas heated reforming improves Fischer-Tropsch process - Oil & Gas Journal
Page 6 of 10
A series configuration is both smaller and more efficient than a parallel GHR and ATR
combination.
GHR development
Synetix first developed the leading concept ammonia (LCA) process, which
incorporated GHR, in the 1980s. LCA was applied to ammonia production with plants
being commissioned near Bristol, UK, in 1988 and later at Yazoo City, Miss., in 1998.
In the early 1990s Synetix adapted the technology for methanol production as the
leading concept methanol (LCM) process. A demonstration methanol unit has been
operating near Melbourne, Australia, since 1994.
In the latest extension, we have applied GHR technology to the syngas production for
FT-based GTL plants.
Advanced GHR
The AGHR (Fig. 6) has a simplified internal design with a seal system that
accommodates tube expansion without the need to use bayonet tubes.
These changes simplify the design and fabrication and result in a substantial reduction
in unit cost. Catalyst loading and removal is also much easier and performed the same
way as a conventional steam reformer using traditional sock loading or an advanced
catalyst loading system.
Detailed engineering studies show that the AGHR can be scaled up to a capacity of
25,000-30,000 b/d in a single train. The Coogee AGHR has been in operation for more
than 3 years and has proved the unit's new design features.
http://www.ogj.com/articles/print/volume-100/issue-16/processing/gas-heated-reformi... 16.06.2015
Gas heated reforming improves Fischer-Tropsch process - Oil & Gas Journal
Page 7 of 10
AGHR plants for methanol and ammonia production have operated for many years,
and the materials of construction as well as the process and mechanical design are
fully established for these applications.
Using an AGHR for GTL offers a significant improvement in thermal efficiency. Even
more efficiency gains and capital cost benefits result from more severe reforming
conditions, specifically a lower SR. The optimum SR is normally between 0.6 and 1.0,
the exact optimum of which depends on the individual project.
No materials of construction have been commercially demonstrated to operate
successfully at the lower SR conditions required for the optimum use of GHR
technology in GTL plants. Experience shows that, while laboratory and other smallscale testing may provide some limited initial screening of materials, it cannot provide
reliable data on the performance of an alloy under plant conditions.
Materials demonstration unit
The MDU has two GHRs with full-size tubes, each coupled to a secondary reformer
and associated equipment. The two trains operate at different conditions to
demonstrate metallurgy suitable for GTL and enhanced methanol process conditions.
In an experimental program initially lasting 18 months, the MDU will test several
different alloys simultaneously with conditions closely replicating those of a full-scale
commercial unit. The unit will provide long-term data under commercial plant
conditions.
References
1. Chang, T., "New JV markets one-stop GTL package," OGJ, Dec. 18, 2000, p. 49.
2. Steynberg, A.P., Vogel, A.P., Price, J.G., and Nel, H.G., "Technology targets for
gas to liquids applications," presented at the AIChE Spring meeting, Apr. 22-26,
2001, Houston.
The authors
Jim Abbott is a GTL technology specialist for Synetix, Bill ingham, UK, in which he
focuses on delivering the application of syngas technology to GTL. Recently, he was
engaged in process development of Synetix's refinery business. Abbott joined ICI 22
years ago and joined the Katalco group in 1987. He has worked for 8 years in the
methanol business, in which he played a key role in demonstrating the Synetix leading
concept methanol technology. He has a degree from Cambridge University, UK.
Click here to enlarge image
Bernard J. Crewdson is a business development manager for Synetix's GTL and fuel
cells businesses. He joined joined ICI in 1975 and held a number of posts in process
engineering and production management before joining Synetix (formerly Katalco) in
1987. Crewdson also spent 10 years in catalyst sales and marketing. He graduated
from Cambridge University with a degree in chemical engineering.
http://www.ogj.com/articles/print/volume-100/issue-16/processing/gas-heated-reformi... 16.06.2015
Gas heated reforming improves Fischer-Tropsch process - Oil & Gas Journal
Page 8 of 10
RELATED ARTICLES
Chinese plant commissions propylene unit
01/30/2015 Sanyuan Petrochemical Co. Ltd. (SPCL), a subsidiary of Zhejiang Fuling Holding
Group, has commissioned a 450,000-tonne/year propane dehydrogenation...
BHP to drill first deepwater well off Trinidad in 2016, energy minister says
01/30/2015 BHP Billiton and its partner BP PLC will drill their first well in Trinidad and Tobagos
deep water in 2016 according to the Caribbean twin-island ...
Chevrons $35 billion capital budget down 13% from last year
01/30/2015 Chevron Corp. will allocate $35 billion in its capital and exploratory investment
program for 2015, including $4 billion of planned expenditures by...
WHITE PAPERS
http://www.ogj.com/articles/print/volume-100/issue-16/processing/gas-heated-reformi... 16.06.2015
Gas heated reforming improves Fischer-Tropsch process - Oil & Gas Journal
Page 9 of 10
Sponsored by ORACLE
Squeezing the Green: How to Cut Petroleum Downstream Costs and Optimize
Processing Efficiencies with Enterprise Project Portfolio Management Solutions
As the downstream petroleum industry grapples with change in every sector and at every level,
includin...
Sponsored by ORACLE
AVAILABLE WEBCASTS
On Demand
http://www.ogj.com/articles/print/volume-100/issue-16/processing/gas-heated-reformi... 16.06.2015
Gas heated reforming improves Fischer-Tropsch process - Oil & Gas Journal
Page 10 of 10
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Stay Connected
Home
Events
Advertise
About Us
General Interest
Training
Newsletter Subscription
PennWell
Market Connection
Book Store
White Papers
Privacy Policy
Processing
Webcasts
Site Map
Transportation
PennEnergy Jobs
Contact Us
Webmaster
(713) 621-9720
Unconventional
Equipment
Magazine Subscription
Research
Mobile
RSS
OTC
http://www.ogj.com/articles/print/volume-100/issue-16/processing/gas-heated-reformi... 16.06.2015