Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract: Although stress induces analgesia, there is evidence that stressful events may exacerbate
pain syndromes. Here, we studied the effects of 1 to 3 prestressful events (days 0, 2, and 7), such as
non-nociceptive environmental stress, on inflammatory hyperalgesia induced by a carrageenan injection (day 14) in 1 rat hind paw. Changes in nociceptive threshold were evaluated by the paw pressure
vocalization test. The higher the number of stress sessions presented to the rats, the greater was the
inflammatory hyperalgesia. Blockade of opioid receptors by naltrexone before each stress inhibited
stress-induced analgesia and suppressed the exaggerated inflammatory hyperalgesia. Stressed versus nonstressed animals could be discriminated by their response to a fentanyl ultra-low dose
(fULD), that produced hyperalgesia or analgesia, respectively. This pharmacological test permitted
the prediction of the pain vulnerability level of prestressed rats because fULD analgesic or hyperalgesic indices were positively correlated with inflammatory hyperalgesic indices (r2 = .84). In prestressed rats, fULD-induced hyperalgesia and the exaggerated inflammatory hyperalgesia were
prevented NMDA receptor antagonists. This study provides some preclinical evidence that pain intensity is not only the result of nociceptive input level but is also dependent on the individual history,
especially prior life stress events associated with endogenous opioid release.
Perspective: Based on these preclinical data, it would be of clinical interest to evaluate whether
prior stressful events may also affect further pain sensation in humans. Moreover, this preclinical
model could be a good tool for evaluating new therapeutic strategies for relieving pain hypersensitivity.
2011 by the American Pain Society
Key words: Stress, pain sensitization, hyperalgesia, endogenous opioids, NMDA receptors.
pioid-dependent stress decreases acute pain sensitivity, a phenomenon referred to as stressinduced analgesia.1 However, consistent with
the biopsychosocial conceptual framework,15 there is
a compelling body of evidence in humans that unmanaged negative emotion associated with stressful events
is a psychological predictor of exaggerated acute pain;
for example, as postoperative pain.22 In preclinical
Received October 7, 2010; Revised April 21, 2011; Accepted April 30, 2011.
Victor Se
galen Bordeaux 2, Universite
Bordeaux
Supported by Universite
re de lEducation Nationale, de lenseignement supe
rieur et
1, the Ministe
de la Recherche and the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
re de la Recherche
(CNRS). C. Le Roy has a fellowship from the Ministe
rieur.
et de lEnseignement Supe
Address reprint requests to Pr Guy Simonnet, Laboratory CNRS UMR 5287,
ostasie-Allostasie-Pathologie-Re
habilitation, Universite
Team Home
tage, 146 rue Le
o Saignat, 33076 BorBordeaux 2 Zone Nord Bat 4A 3eme e
deaux Cedex, France. E-mail: gsimonnet@yahoo.com
1526-5900/$36.00
2011 by the American Pain Society
doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2011.04.011
models, there is a growing body of evidence that repeated exposure of animals to non-nociceptive stressful
situations can elicit a persistent increase in nociception.21,35,37,43 Pain hypersensitivity induced by stress is
a lesser-known phenomenon than stress-induced analgesia, despite the fact it is much more relevant from
the clinical and therapeutic viewpoints since pain hypersensitivity leads to exaggerated pain and enhancement
of medical care. Neural mechanisms by which prior stress
may induce pain aggravation following acute tissue
injury have to be better understood for identifying patients at risk for developing exaggerated pain following
a tissue injury.26 Indeed, clinical studies to date have
failed to distinguish the significant role of stressful
events that occur before or after to acute tissue injuries
in the development of exaggerated pain. Preclinical animal studies have the advantage of allowing one to selectively evaluate the role of prestressful events in pain
hypersensitivity.
1069
1070
Drugs
Fentanyl citrate, ketamine hydrochloride, BN2572, naltrexone, and carrageenan l (Sigma-Aldrich, SaintQuentin Fallavier, France) were dissolved in physiological
saline (.9%). BN2572, the gacyclidine enantiomer (-)-(1S2R)-1-[1-(2-thienyl)-2-methylcyclohexyl] piperidine, is an
NMDA receptor antagonist19 with a longer half-life
and inducing more moderated side effects than ketamine.20,38 This drug was obtained from BEAUFOURIPSEN (Les Ulis, France).
Fentanyl (50 ng/kg), ketamine (10 mg/kg), BN2572
(.3 mg/kg), and naltrexone (1 mg/kg) were administered
subcutaneously (s.c.; 1 mL/kg body weight). Control animals received an equal volume of saline injections.
Methods
The NES consisted of exposing animals to a novel environment for 1 hour, as previously described.38 Rats were
placed in a new experimental room, in new cages with
fresh litter, and were exposed to a light (350 lux) placed
2 meters away from the rat cages. At the end of the stress
session, rats were returned to their home cage in the
usual experimental room. Nonstressed animals were
kept in their home cages.
Animals
Le Roy et al
At the end of the stress session, rats were returned to
their home cages. Nonstressed animals were maintained
in their home cages.
Two types of environmental stress were used in the
first part of this study (Experiment 1) to be sure that
changes in pain sensitivity was not specifically associated
with 1 type of stress, especially the NES mainly used in
this study.
Experimental Procedure
Following arrival at the laboratory, the animals were
randomly assigned to the different experimental groups
and acclimatized to the animal care unit for 4 days. To
avoid experimental perturbations that may have affected the measurement of nociceptive threshold, the
experiments were performed by the same experimenter
under quiet conditions in a testing room close to the animal care unit. For 8 days prior to the experiments, the
animals were placed in the test room for 2 hours daily
for acclimatization. In this test room, the animals were
weighed daily and gently handled for 5 minutes. All experiments were performed on groups of 8 animals each
during the light cycle. Experimental design is shown in
Fig 1. Nociceptive threshold assessments were performed
for 2 days (ie, on D 2 and D 1) preceding the experimental day (D0) and were repeated on the experimental day
immediately before the first stress event (D0). Experiments were only initiated when there were no statistical
changes in the basal nociceptive threshold for 3 successive days (D 2, D 1 and D0, 1-way ANOVA, P > .05). The
reference value of the nociceptive threshold was selected as the basal value on D0. The experimenter was unaware of the treatment used. On D0, D2 and D7, NNES
were performed. For the novel environment stress
(NES), nociceptive threshold was measured 30 minutes
after the beginning of each stress period and every
hour for 4 hours during the poststress period. For the
1071
forced swim stress test (FSS), nociceptive threshold measurements were performed at the end of the stress period (20 minutes after the beginning of the stress
event) and every 30 minutes for 2 hours during the poststress period.
For the fULD test, nociceptive threshold measurements
were performed every 30 minutes for 4 hours following
a subcutaneous injection of 50 ng/kg of fentanyl on D8
and D13.
On D14, nociceptive thresholds were measured 2, 4,
and 6 hours after a carrageenan injection and once daily
for 12 to 18 days. The diameter of the inflamed hind paw
was evaluated daily with a caliper rule.
Experiment 4: Effect of NMDA Receptor Antagonist Administration on Changes in Nociceptive Threshold Induced by Inflammation
in Prestressed Rats
Figure 1. Experimental design. In rats, nociceptive thresholds
were evaluated by the paw pressure vocalization test. Drugs or
saline (.9% NaCl) were administered subcutaneously. The gray
square indicates experimental day with stress session, drug administration or lesion (see Methods). Fentanyl ULD, Fentanyl
ultra-low dose.
1072
Statistical Analysis
The data represent the mean 6 SEM. Repeated measures 2-way analyses of variance (ANOVA), with factors
time (within) and group (between) were performed
with Statistica 5.1 (Statsoft, Maisons-Alfort, France).
When ANOVAs showed a significant time effect (P <
.05), Newman Keuls post hoc test was used to assess
the differences of each time point versus basal value
on D0. When ANOVAs showed a significant group effect
and/or a time-group interaction (P < .05), Newman
Keuls post hoc test was used to assess the differences
between groups. Separated 2-way ANOVA were performed on different experimental periods (see experimental design on Fig 1): from D 2 to D0 for checking
the stability of basal nociceptive threshold before the
beginning of experiment; on D0 (1st stress session),
from D1 to D2, on D2 (2nd stress session), from D3 to
D7, on D7 (3rd stress session), on D8 (1st fULD test),
from D9 to D13, on D13 (2nd fULD test), on D14 (inflammation) and from D15 to D34. For comparing amplitude
of stress-induced analgesia on D0, D2, and D7, a repeated
measures 2-way ANOVA was performed followed by
Newman Keuls post hoc test when ANOVA showed a significant time effect.
Analgesic or hyperalgesic indices, represented by the
area under or above the curve, respectively, were calculated for each rat using the trapezoidal method. As previously reported,9 surface areas were calculated by
summing the nociceptive threshold values measured
every day after the planned experimental day according the formula Surface = S(nociceptive threshold at
Dn11)
basal value (n 1 1). The n value indicates
the number of days with a nociceptive threshold statistically different (1-way ANOVA and Newman Keuls test,
P < .05) from the nociceptive threshold basal value. Hyperalgesic indexes were expressed as the mean percentage (6 SEM) of the reference index (100% denotes
a value that matches that of the control, ie, nonstressed
rats in Experiments 1 and 2 and saline-treated rats in Experiment 4). By contrast, the absolute values were used
in Experiment 3 for linear correlation analysis. Linear
correlation analyses were conducted between the hyperalgesic indices obtained after fULD administration
and after carrageenan administration. One-way ANOVA was used to compare analgesic or hyperalgesic indices following fULD administration, and hyperalgesic
indices following carrageenan injection. If ANOVA revealed a significant group effect, Newman Keuls post
hoc test was used to determine the differences between groups. Differences were considered significant
at P < .05.
Results
Effect of Prior Exposure to Stress on
Changes in Nociceptive Threshold
Induced by Inflammation
The NES induced analgesia that was limited to the time
of stress exposure (Figs 2A and 2C; Newman Keuls test, P
< .05). The amplitude of analgesia decreased with repetition of the stressor (Newman Keuls test, P < .05). No
change in nociceptive threshold was observed in nonstressed rats (1-way ANOVA, P > .05). In nonstressed
rats, an intraplantar carrageenan injection on D14 induced a decrease in nociceptive threshold in inflamed
and noninflamed hind paws for 4 days (Fig 2A; Newman
Keuls test, P < .05) and 2 days (Fig 2C; Newman Keuls test,
P < .05), respectively. In stressed rats, an intraplantar carrageenan injection on D14 (7 days after the last stress) induced a decrease in nociceptive threshold in inflamed
and noninflamed hind paws for 12 days (Fig 2A; Newman
Keuls test, P < .05) and 9 days (Fig 2C; Newman Keuls test,
P < .05), respectively. The hyperalgesic indices were increased 3.7- to 4.5-fold in inflamed and noninflamed
hind paws, respectively, when compared with the nonstressed group (Figs 2A and 2C, Insets; Newman Keuls
test, P < .05).
The FSS induced analgesia that lasted for 1 hour after
stress exposure (Figs 2B and 2D; Newman Keuls test, P <
.05). The amplitude of the analgesia decreased with repetition of the stressor (Newman Keuls test, P < .05). No
change in nociceptive threshold was observed in nonstressed rats (1-way ANOVA, P > .05). When the nonstressed rats received an intraplantar carrageenan
injection on D14, a decrease in the nociceptive thresholds of inflamed and noninflamed hind paws was observed for 4 days (Fig 2B; Newman Keuls test, P < .05)
and 1 day (Fig 2D; Newman Keuls test, P < .05), respectively. In stressed rats, the intraplantar carrageenan
Le Roy et al
1073
Figure 2. Effects of prior exposure to stress on changes in the nociceptive threshold induced by inflammation in rats. Nociceptive
threshold changes were evaluated by the paw pressure vocalization test on inflamed (A, B) and noninflamed (C, D) hind paws. Novel
environment stress (A, C) or forced swim stress (B, D) were performed on D0, D2, and D7 in stressed groups. Stress was not performed in
nonstressed groups. On D14, the nonstressed group (B) and the stressed group () received an intraplantar carrageenan injection.
Mean pressure values to trigger vocalization were expressed in grams 6 SEM (n = 8 for each group). *Newman Keuls test, P < .05
for comparison with nonstressed group. Insets indicate postinflammation hyperalgesic indexes calculated (see Methods) using the
variations of the nociceptive threshold of the inflamed or noninflamed in nonstressed groups (white square) and in stressed groups
(black square). $Newman Keuls test, P < .05 for comparison with nonstressed group.
1074
Evaluation of Diameter of Inflamed Hind Paw in the Nonstressed, the 1 Stress, the 2 Stress,
and the 3 Stress Groups in Experiment 3. Diameter was Evaluated 2 Hours, 4 Hours, and 6 Hours
After the Injection of Carrageenan and on the Subsequent Days. All Data are Expressed as Mean 6
SEM.
Table 1.
Non-stressed
1 Stress
2 Stress
3 Stress
D14 BASAL
D14 2H
D14 4H
D14 6H
D16
D18
D20
D22
3.72 6 0.05
3.66 6 0.04
3.78 6 0.05
3.79 6 0.07
9.58 6 0.36
9.58 6 0.33
9.23 6 0.49
9.20 6 0.42
10.33 6 0.14
10.35 6 0.23
10.08 6 0.25
10.46 6 0.36
9.92 6 0.25
9.78 6 0.36
9.78 6 0.24
9.58 6 0.27
6.35 6 0.20
6.38 6 0.28
5.92 6 0.19
5.73 6 0.13
4.95 6 0.11
4.95 6 0.21
4.70 6 0.12
4.66 6 0.12
4.67 6 0.05
4.75 6 0.17
4.45 6 0.10
4.35 6 0.09
4.23 6 0.09
4.26 6 0.08
4.12 6 0.05
3.97 6 0.08
Figure 3. Effect of naltrexone administration immediately before each NES session on changes in the nociceptive threshold
induced by inflammation. Nociceptive threshold changes
were evaluated by the paw pressure vocalization test on inflamed (A) and noninflamed (B) hind paws. Two groups of
rats were subjected to novel environment stress on D0, D2,
and D7 and received a preadministration of naltrexone (1 mg/
kg, s.c.) (A) or saline (>) 30 minutes before each stress. A nonstressed group received similar saline (B) injections on D0, D2,
and D7 but was not exposed to stress session. On D14, all groups
were subjected to inflammatory pain. Mean pressure values to
trigger vocalization were expressed in grams 6 SEM (n = 8 for
each group). *Newman Keuls test, P < .05 for comparison between Naltrexone-stressed group and stressed group. Insets indicate postinflammation hyperalgesic indexes calculated (see
Methods) using the variations of the nociceptive threshold of
the inflamed or noninflamed in the nonstressed group (black
diamond), the stressed group (dashed square), and the
Naltrexone-stressed group (black square). $Newman Keuls
test, P < .05 for comparison with nonstressed group; 1Newman
Keuls test, P < .05 for comparison with stressed group.
Le Roy et al
1075
1076
Discussion
The main finding of this study is that endogenous opioids, which are released during non-nociceptive environmental stress (NNES) and induce acute analgesia,
secondarily induce a long-lasting and latent pain hypersensitivity that leads to an exaggerated pain in response
to further noxious stimulation. Interestingly, the higher
the number of stress sessions presented to the rats, the
Le Roy et al
the analgesic of choice for the treatment of moderateto-severe pain, we and others8,9,28,32 have previously
reported that in animals a long-lasting hyperalgesia
and a latent pain hypersensitivity are observed after analgesia. Clinical studies have also reported that the exogenous opioids used for surgery can unexpectedly
facilitate postoperative hyperalgesia and allodynia after
analgesia.2,17 Consistent with the effects of exogenous
opioids,2,9,32 our results show that the acute and
delayed effects of endogenous opioids are also
opposite in nature.
Interestingly, pain hypersensitivity was not limited to
the injured hind paw, because we also observed an enhancement of secondary hyperalgesia in the contralateral noninflamed hind paw in prestressed rats. Altered
sensitivity in contralateral structures has been observed
in many animal models of pain, especially inflammatory
pain.41 In the absence of differences in hind paw inflammation in prestressed versus nonstressed rats, these results suggest that the latent pain hypersensitivity
induced by NNES is primarily derived from a central origin. Experimental investigations in animals have demonstrated that opioid-induced hyperalgesia may result
from tonic activation of a descending pain facilitatory
pathway in which the rostroventromedial medulla plays
a critical role.45 Such descending facilitation may influence spinal cord networks involved in the expression of
paradoxical pain.
From a mechanistic viewpoint, experimental studies indicate that administration of NMDA receptor antagonists
totally prevented the enhancement of both inflammatory
or surgical hyperalgesia induced by fentanyl in rats.36,39
This suggests that prior exposure to exogenous opioids
has facilitated the development of NMDA receptormediated central changes in synaptic excitability leading
to exaggerated hyperalgesia following tissue injuries.7,8,39
In the present study, the exaggerated inflammatory
hyperalgesia observed in prestressed rats was suppressed
when NMDA receptor antagonists were administered
immediately prior to inflammation. Indeed, a single
BN2572 injection is more effective than 3 ketamine
injections, suggesting that this compound is a better
drug for blocking the activation of pronociceptive
systems. Since we previously reported that NMDA
receptor antagonists did not affect inflammatory
hyperalgesia in nonstressed rats,39 these results suggest
a critical role for NMDA receptor systems in exaggerated
inflammatory hyperalgesia induced by prior stress. It is
well known that m-opioid receptor stimulation by exogenous opioids triggers the activation of NMDA receptors
by reducing Mg21 blockade via the activation of intracellular protein kinase C10,11 leading to hyperalgesia.14,31 This
mechanism may also explain the development of pain
hypersensitivity induced by endogenous opioids.
However, the administration of an NMDA receptor
antagonist in prestressed rats that were returned to
basal nociceptive thresholds after stress-induced analgesia
had no effect per se on basal nociceptive threshold. This
result indicates that pain hypersensitivity, as revealed by
exaggerated inflammatory hyperalgesia, is not associated
with excessive basal activity at the NMDA synaptic cleft. In-
1077
1078
experienced rats,40 may provide an useful strategy. Studies are in progress to evaluate these putative therapeutic
approaches.
References
15. Engel GL: The need for a new medical model: A challenge for biomedicine. Science 196:129-136, 1977
2. Angst MS, Clark JD: Opioid-induced hyperalgesia: A qualitative systematic review. Anesthesiology 104:570-587, 2006
3. Angst MS, Koppert W, Pahl I, Clark DJ, Schmelz M: Shortterm infusion of the mu-opioid agonist remifentanil in humans causes hyperalgesia during withdrawal. Pain 106:
49-57, 2003
4. Basbaum AI: Insights into the development of opioid tolerance [editorial]. Pain 61:349-352, 1995
5. Cabanero D, Campillo A, Celerier E, Romero A, Puig MM:
Pronociceptive effects of remifentanil in a mouse model of
postsurgical pain: Effect of a second surgery. Anesthesiology
111:1334-1345, 2009
le
rier E, Gonzalez JR, Maldonado R, Cabanero D,
6. Ce
Puig MM: Opioid-induced hyperalgesia in a murine model
of postoperative pain: Role of nitric oxide generated from
the inducible nitric oxide synthase. Anesthesiology 104:
546-555, 2006
Acknowledgments
Le Roy and Emilie Laboureyras contributed
Chloe
equally to this work.
le
rier E, Laulin J, Larcher A, Le Moal M, Simonnet G: Ev7. Ce
idence for opiate-activated NMDA processes masking opiate
analgesia in rats. Brain Res 847:18-25, 1999
21. Imbe H, Iwai-Liao Y, Senba E: Stress-induced hyperalgesia: Animal models and putative mechanisms. Front Biosci
11:2179-2192, 2006
le
rier E, Laulin JP, Corcuff JB, Le Moal M, Simonnet G:
8. Ce
Progressive enhancement of delayed hyperalgesia induced
by repeated heroin administration: A sensitization process.
J Neurosci 21:4074-4080, 2001
22. Ip HY, Abrishami A, Peng PW, Wong J, Chung F: Predictors of postoperative pain and analgesic consumption: A
qualitative systematic review. Anesthesiology 111:657-677,
2009
le
rier E, Rivat C, Jun Y, Laulin JP, Larcher A, Reynier P,
9. Ce
Simonnet G: Long-lasting hyperalgesia induced by fentanyl
in rats: Preventive effect of ketamine. Anesthesiology 92:
465-472, 2000
Le Roy et al
28. Laboureyras E, Chateauraynaud J, Richebe P,
Simonnet G: Long-term pain vulnerability after surgery in
rats: Prevention by nefopam, an analgesic with antihyperalgesic properties. Anesth Analg 109:623-631, 2009
29. Latremoliere A, Woolf CJ: Central sensitization: A generator of pain hypersensitivity by central neural plasticity.
J Pain 10:895-926, 2009
le
rier E, Le Moal M, Simonnet G:
30. Laulin JP, Larcher A, Ce
Long-lasting increased pain sensitivity in rat following exposure to heroin for the first time. Eur J Neurosci 10:782-785,
1998
31. Mao J, Price DD, Mayer DJ: Mechanisms of hyperalgesia
and morphine tolerance: A current view of their possible interactions. Pain 62:259-274, 1995
32. Mao J, Price DD, Mayer DJ: Thermal hyperalgesia in association with the development of morphine tolerance in rats:
Roles of excitatory amino acid receptors and protein kinase
C. J Neurosci 14:2301-2312, 1994
33. McLean SA, Clauw DJ: Predicting chronic symptoms
after an acute stressorlessons learned from 3 medical
conditions. Med Hypotheses 63:653-658, 2004
34. Perkins FM, Kehlet H: Chronic pain as an outcome of surgery. A review of predictive factors. Anesthesiology 93:
1123-1133, 2000
35. Quintero L, Moreno M, Avila C, Arcaya J, Maixner W,
Suarez-Roca H: Long-lasting delayed hyperalgesia after subchronic swim stress. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 67:449-458,
2000
36. Richebe P, Rivat C, Laulin JP, Maurette P, Simonnet G:
Ketamine improves the management of exaggerated postoperative pain observed in perioperative fentanyl-treated
rats. Anesthesiology 102:421-428, 2005
37. Rivat C, Becker C, Blugeot A, Zeau B, Mauborgne A,
Pohl M, Benoliel JJ: Chronic stress induces transient spinal
neuroinflammation, triggering sensory hypersensitivity
and long-lasting anxiety-induced hyperalgesia. Pain 150:
358-368, 2010
1079
48. Xie JY, Herman DS, Stiller CO, Gardell LR, Ossipov MH,
Lai J, Porreca F, Vanderah TW: Cholecystokinin in the rostral
ventromedial medulla mediates opioid-induced hyperalgesia and antinociceptive tolerance. J Neurosci 25:409-416,
2005