Professional Documents
Culture Documents
341
Silviu N. Bunta
342
Encyclopedia of the Bible and Its Reception 1 ( Walter de Gruyter, Berlin/New York 2009)
343
man now toils on the ground in order to gain sustenance, the woman desires the man who now rules
over her and bears children in pain, and her offspring and that of the serpent will be at enmity.
No interpretation addresses all the problems in
this story. Significant issues remain. What is the
nature of the relation between the man and the
woman when the latter plays a more significant
role in the story? Is the disobedience really that,
and is the point of the Lords command to test, to
protect the humans, or to protect his own interests?
And is not the serpent right about the result of eating from the tree of knowledge?
More recent studies of Gen 2 : 4b3 : 24 provide
other approaches to the story of Adam and Eve.
Some suggest that Eves disobedience may not be
as severe as is usually thought. It could be seen
more as an example of civil disobedience leading
to a positive growth or rise in the status of humanity. Brett argues that the multiple ironies and puzzles within the text are intentional on the writers
part. In Gen 1 humans are seen in the likeness of
God, but in Gen 2 : 4b3 : 24 they are humbled
through their behavior. The wisdom they gain
from the tree of knowledge, which is opposed by
the writer, is royal wisdom associated with the Persian rule. The writer sees the story as a subversive
tale directed against the Persian-sponsored leadership of the post-exilic period, when the Genesis
narrative took its final shape (cf. Carr).
Bibliography: M. G. Brett, Genesis (London 2000).
C. M. Carmichael, The Paradise Myth, in A Walk in the
Garden (eds. P. Morris/D. Sawyer, JSOT.S 136; Sheffield
1992) 4763. D. Carr, The Politics of Textual Subversion, JBL 112/4 (1993) 57795. H. N. Wallace, The Eden
Narrative (HSS; Cambridge, Mass. 1985).
Howard N. Wallace
II. Judaism
The relation between Adam and Eve received different (and at times conflicting) explanations in
classical rabbinic Judaism. However, there seems to
be a general consensus that Eve was created later
than Adam. According to one tradition, Adam and
Eve were created on the same day, only a few hours
apart (bSan 38b; WayR 29 : 1). In one explanation,
God, knowing that Adam would eventually complain about Eve, did not create her until Adam
asked for her (BerR 17 : 4). One text appreciates the
sexual connotations of the story of Gen 2 : 1825
and, particularly in light of ha-paam from Gen
2 : 23, suggests that Eve was created because Adam
had had intercourse with all the animals and had
not found satisfaction (bYev 63a).
There is no consensus on how Eve was created.
One opinion understands tsela of Gen 2 : 21 as
side, reads Gen 1 : 27 (male and female he created them) in conjunction with Gen 5 : 2 (Male
and female he created them and he called their
344
Encyclopedia of the Bible and Its Reception 1 ( Walter de Gruyter, Berlin/New York 2009)
345
346
Encyclopedia of the Bible and Its Reception 1 ( Walter de Gruyter, Berlin/New York 2009)
347
36b, 54a; 2 : 231a; 3 : 76b). Already PRE did not consider Cain the son of Adam, but the son of the angel
Samael, who rode on the serpent on his way to Eve
(PRE 13, 2122).
In turn, Adam was seduced by two female demons and begot beings who are neither fully human nor fully angelic (Zohar 3 : 77b). Moreover,
Adam cohabited with the female demon Lilith before God made Eve for him out of his side (Zohar
1 : 34b35a; see also PRE 20). Lilith fled after God
sawed Eve out of Adam and prepared Eve as
Adams bride, and she has ever since inhabited the
cities of the sea trying to ensnare humankind (Zohar
3 : 19a, 76b77a).
While in early traditions the sin of Adam and
Eve and the subsequent sins of humankind account
for the dysfunction of the world, for later speculations in Lurianic Judaism, the sin of Adam and Eve
is not the ultimate origin of the fallen state of creation. The protoplasts lived in a fallen world, the
product of an imperfect process of creation, a process of divine contraction and fragmentation. The
world is, through its very creation, in exile and disjointed. In this world sin is, in a sense, unavoidable
(Magid: 1819, 3474). The human person created
in the image of God has the ability to repair the
fractured world through the performance of commandments (ibid.: 1819). Lurianic Kabbalah understands the image of God as the righteous Jewish
soul, that is, the good components of Adams soul
reincarnated in the righteous. Adams soul contained all the souls of humankind. Not all of these
souls sinned with Adam; while some fell with
Adam, others separated from the protoplast and ascended into the divine realm or hid in the garden,
and remained untouched by Adams sin.
The story of Adam and Eve is not regarded as
historical in most forms of modern Judaism. Although modern Judaism is still very much informed by ancient and medieval traditions, the
story of Adam and Eve, in its biblical and post-biblical forms, resonates rather as a story of choice between good and evil, of failure, exile, and reparation, a paradigm both to humanity as a whole and
to Israel in particular.
Bibliography: G. Anderson, Celibacy or Consummation
in the Garden?, HThR 82 (1989) 12148. L. Ginzberg,
The Legends of the Jews, 7 vols. (Philadelphia, Pa. 190938).
K. E. Kwam et al. (eds.), Eve and Adam (Bloomington, Ind.
1999). S. Magid, From Metaphysics to Midrash (Bloomington, Ind. 2008). P. Morris, Exiled from Eden, in A
Walk in the Garden (eds. P. Morris/D. Sawyer; London 1992)
R. Patai, The Hebrew Goddess (Detroit, Mich.
11766.
1990). P. Schfer, Adam in jdischer berlieferung, in
id., Vom alten zum neuen Adam (Freiburg 1986) 6993.
Silviu N. Bunta
III. Christianity
A. General Observations
The figures of Adam and Eve as the first parents of
all humans have been treated in many ways during
the history of Christianity, but the central element
348
Encyclopedia of the Bible and Its Reception 1 ( Walter de Gruyter, Berlin/New York 2009)
349
Gary A. Anderson
B. Historical Developments
Christian thinkers down to the advent of historicalcritical study of the Bible accepted the Pauline interpretation of the story of Adam and Eve as the
revelation of how sin and death entered the world.
The question that confronted them was, What
kind of story is it? i.e., should the narrative found
in Gen 2 : 43 : 24 be taken in a literal sense as a
record of real events, or is it a symbolic tale in need
of a deeper allegorical reading? Some interpreters
adhered closely to one view or the other, but many
adopted mediating positions between the two extremes.
Origen referenced texts about paradise, the
trees in the garden, and the eating of the forbidden
fruit (Gen 2 : 89, 3 : 8) as examples of figurative
expressions which indicate certain mysteries
through a semblance of history and not through
actual events (Princ. 4.3.1). Basil of Caesarea, in his
Homiliae in Hexaemeron (although these do not reach
as far as the Adam and Eve story), on the other
hand, insisted on taking Genesis in a literal way
(Hom. 9.1). Gregory of Nyssa, who completed his
older brothers reading of how man was made in
the image of God in his De opificio hominis, did not
hesitate to give a more spiritual reading of many
aspects of the creation and fall story (De hom. opif.
1622). Although Augustine interpreted Adam and
Eve in a highly allegorical way in his early commentaries on Genesis, his lengthy De Genesi ad litteram (ca. 401415) accepts the historicity of Gen 2
3, while still seeking the inner meaning of the actors and the events. As he summarized in the Civ.
13.21: allegorical interpretations may be suitably put on paradise without giving offense to anyone, while we yet believe the strict truth of the history confirmed by its circumstantial narrative of
facts.
Most medieval interpreters followed this mediating view, as we find in Peter Lombards Libri Sententiarum II, dd. 1729 (especially 17.5.2), and the
many commentaries on this text (e.g., Thomas
Aquinas). The dominant Augustinian view, however, was by no means universal. The longest and
350
Bernard McGinn
IV. Islam
In Islam, Adam and Eve are involved together in
Gods provision in the garden, in the temptation to
eat of a forbidden tree, and in the consequences of
their action. Eves name does not appear in the
Quran, where she is referred to four times only as
the mate (zawj) of Adam. The Quran does not give
the story of the creation of Eve, but mentions that
God created you [humankind] from a single soul
and created its mate from it (S 4 : 1). The purpose
of this creation is that he might take rest in her
(S 7 : 189).
The details of the temptation of Adam and Eve
are different in the Qurans several variant traditions. God invites the pair to eat freely in the garden, but forbids them to come near this tree
(S 2 : 35; 7 : 19). The temptation scene is set with
foreshadowing. Ibl s, the devil, promises to ambush Adam and Eve (S 7 : 16) and to come upon
them from before and behind (S 7 : 17). Satan
swears to beguile all humans except for Gods sincere servants (S 38 : 8283). God meanwhile highlights the virtues of living in the Garden and warns
Adam and Eve that Satan is their enemy (S 20 : 117
19; S 7 : 22).
Satan describes the unnamed tree of prohibition to Adam as the tree of eternity (khuld)
(S 20 : 120). Satan whispers to Adam and Eve that
God gave the prohibition lest you should become
angels or become of the immortals (S 7 : 20). Satan
swears that he is their sincere advisor (S 7 : 21). His
intention, however, is to show them what was
hidden from them of their shame (S 7 : 20).
Adam and Eve eat of the tree (S 20 : 121, 7 : 22).
They immediately see their shame, and begin to
cover themselves with the leaves of the garden. God
confronts Adam and his wife: Did I not forbid you
both from that tree? (S 7 : 22).
Encyclopedia of the Bible and Its Reception 1 ( Walter de Gruyter, Berlin/New York 2009)
351
In characterizing the action of the pair, one tradition says Satan caused Adam and his wife to slip
(azalla, S 2 : 36). Another account says that Adam
forgot (S 20 : 115), then adds that Adam disobeyed
or rebelled (asa) and went astray (S 20.121). In a
third account, Satan led them on by delusion
(ghurur) (S 7 : 22). After tasting of the tree, Adam
and his wife say we have wronged (z alama) ourselves (S 7 : 23). Satan tempted (fatana) the parents
of the children of Adam and brought them out of
the Garden (S 7 : 27; cf. 2 : 36).
Adam and Eve express their need for divine forgiveness and mercy (S 7 : 23). God then commands
them to get down and ordains enmity among the
human pair and Satan (S 2 : 36; also 7 : 24; 20 : 123).
The pair will live on earth for a while, then die
(S 7 : 2425). However, God gives words to Adam
and turns toward him (S 2 : 37). God chooses Adam
(S 20 : 122), and also promises guidance to the
pair in the future (S 2 : 37): If there comes to you
from me guidance, then whoever follows my guidance shall not go astray, neither shall he be unhappy (S 20 : 123).
Among other quranic materials on the sin of
Adam and Eve and the future of humankind is the
prediction of the angels that the human which God
is about to create will make mischief (fasada) and
shed blood in the earth (S 2 : 30). Exegetes disagreed as to whether this was an accurate forecast of
human action or merely a wild guess of the angels.
Less ambiguous are the threats of Ibl s after he is
cursed for his failure to bow down to Adam. He
says to God, I shall pervert them altogether, except your servants from among them that are sincere (S 38 : 8283). Ibl s promises to deck all fair
to them in the earth (S 15 : 39), and to seize his
seed, save a few (S 17 : 62). In response, God gives
permission to Satan to beguile those whom he can
(S 17 : 6364), and promises to fill hell with Satan
and those who follow Satan (S 38 : 85).
Outside the Quran, all Muslim writers give the
awwa for the unidentified wife of Adam,
name H
explaining that she was created from a living
thing. Ibn Sad cites the biblical etymology of Gen
3 : 20 in the name of Ibn Abbas. Ibn Ish aq and early
commentators on the Quran report that Eve was
created from Adams rib, and speculate about exactly which rib it was. Commentators also suggest
that the unidentified tree of prohibition was a stalk
of wheat, or a grapevine, or a fig tree.
A striking difference between the quranic traditions and the biblical account is the absence of
the theme of man and wife becoming one flesh
(Gen 2 : 24). But already in the 8th century Ibn Ish aq reports, on the authority of the people of
scripture, that when Adam first saw his wife, he
said, My flesh and my blood and my mate.
Muslim scholars were concerned about the
character of the sin of Adam and Eve, and many
352
Gordon Nickel
V. Literature
The story of Adam and Eve in Gen 13 is the subject of substantial elaboration in medieval European literature. The most extensive nexus is that
denoted by the Latin title, Vita Adae et Evae (Life of
Adam and Eve, L.A.E.), which deals with the circumstances of the Temptation in the Garden, the Expulsion and Adams attempt to return to the Garden, the second tempting of Eve by Satan, the
revelation of Satans jealousy of mankind, the story
of Cain and Abel, Adams death, and the mission
of Seth to Paradise in an effort to obtain the oil of
mercy. Versions exist in Greek, Armenian, Georgian, Coptic, Hebrew, and Irish (see Murdoch). Despite the presence of the Seth legend in Josephus
Antiquities, the bulk of the material seems to have
Christian origins.
The L.A.E. and the legends of the Holy Rood are
complementary, overlapping at the death of Adam.
The Virgin Mary is a shadowy presence as the Sec-
Encyclopedia of the Bible and Its Reception 1 ( Walter de Gruyter, Berlin/New York 2009)
353
354
Encyclopedia of the Bible and Its Reception 1 ( Walter de Gruyter, Berlin/New York 2009)
355
eat the fruit. Mary Shelleys Frankenstein (1818) reworks the material of Paradise Lost, the main characters at various times assuming the roles of Adam,
Eve, Satan, and God. At a more popular level, London had 13 pubs named Adam and Eve in a survey
of 1848. The Fruiters Company had Adam and Eve
as their emblem. In Cockney rhyming slang,
Would you Adam and Eve it? translates as
Would you believe it? The protoplasts are treated
abundantly in central European folk-art and folklore of the period.
Victor Hugo (18021885) rewrites Genesis in
his poem DEve Jsus by elevating Eve above Adam
and asserting the primacy of love and maternity.
Baudelaire subverts Edenic imagery in his poem
Bndiction, part of Fleurs du Mal (1857), and has Eve
or the Second Eve threaten to twist this miserable
tree / So its infected buds will never bloom! Rilkes
twin-poems Adam and Eve of 1907 celebrate the
death-defying love of the first couple, embodied in
lofty cathedral sculptures.
Playwrights, novelists and poets continued to
play with the theme. George Eliots Adam Bede
(1859) begins as the story of the Adam who is led
to the tree of knowledge by Eve (Hetty Sorel), but
ends by being the story of Dinah Morris as the Second Adam/Christ-figure in the guise of a Madonna.
George Macdonalds Lilith (1895) has the Librarian,
Mr Raven, who is also Adam. Mark Twains The Diary of Adam and Eve (1905) is a burlesque on the
relations between the sexes. Brechts poem Song
about a Sweetheart (1920) harks back to a strong Eve
who gave the narrator vitality. Shaws Back to Methuselah (1922) has Adam and Eve and the Serpent
engaged in a Hegelian dialectic about mortality and
immortality. Proust makes a reductive use of Adam
and Eve imagery in La Recherche du Temps Perdu
(published posthumously, 1927). Archibald MacLeishs Nobodaddy (1926) makes Adam and Eve achieve
self-consciousness through co-operating with the
serpent. James Joyces Finnegans Wake (1939) is
haunted by Adam and Eve, transmuted as Alum
on Even, alum and olives, atoms and ifs and
atman as evars. D. H. Lawrences lovers in Lady
Chatterleys Lover are regenerate versions of Adam
and Eve.
Dylan Thomass poetry constantly refers to
Adam and Eve, the poet remarking
I know the legend
Of Adam and Eve is never for a second
Silent in my service
Over the dead infants
Over the one
Child who was priest and servants.
(Collected Poems: 130).
The poetry of Robert Graves uses the Eden story to
articulate private thoughts about love, as in Woman
and Tree and in Trial of Innocence. Patrick Whites
novel The Eye of the Storm (1973) has an Adam-figure
356
Anthony Swindell
Encyclopedia of the Bible and Its Reception 1 ( Walter de Gruyter, Berlin/New York 2009)
357
presence was not uniform. Adam and Eve obscuring their nudity revealed the moment of The Temptation and The Fall, as the first couples sin resulted
in shame at their nakedness. Disguising the couples nudity in the visual arts may also reveal a desire for modesty on behalf of the artist or the patron commissioning the work. The nudity of Adam
and Eve operated as a symbol of baptism in the
visual art of the early church. Representations of
the couple appeared at the 3rd century baptistery
of Dura-Europos. The tree in the Garden of Eden
was commonly used as a physical barrier separating
the two figures. The serpent was depicted either
entwined around the tree or at the feet of the couple, representing The Temptation. The forbidden
fruit of the tree, another symbol of their temptation and transgression, was usually portrayed held
by Eve. The serpent either appeared as a typical
snake, or in instances such as the painting of Hugo
van der Goes (1467/1468; and Masolinos fresco,
Brancacci Chapel, Santa Maria del Carmine, Florence), the serpent bore feet and a human-like face,
as it had not yet been banished to slither on the
ground. In the Creation of Adam and Eve, the representation of the divine in the figure of God or Jesus
was included. God was depicted shaping Adam
from clay, breathing the breath of life into the first
man, or infusing Adams body with a soul by the
power of touch, memorably captured by Michelangelo in the Sistine Chapel. God was depicted removing a rib from the side of a slumbering Adam
to be used to shape the first woman. God was included in representations of the Presentation of
Eve, understood as a symbol of the institution of
marriage. Christ appeared in visual examples of The
Creation of Adam and Eve, The Fall, The Expulsion from
Paradise, and the commission of their labors. In
scenes of Adam and Eve Given Instruments of Labor,
Christ handed Adam the symbols of their toil. The
usual symbols of Adam and Eves labors were the
spade wielded by Adam accompanied with Eve
spinning wool. The worn and tattered clothes of
Adam and Eve in depictions of their Expulsion from
Paradise were a symbol of their fallen condition. The
inclusion of Christ at the creation event and in
other scenes involving Adam and Eve reflected the
emphasis in patristic thought of Christ as the Divine Logos, pre-existent to creation. The visual art
revealed an interest in depicting Christ as an architect of creation, thus visually stressing the supremacy of Christ. The figures of Adam and Eve and
their visual attributes symbolize birth, creation,
death, and ultimately resurrection and new creation in the visual arts.
3. Scriptural Episodes in the Visual Arts. Images
of the Story of Adam and Eve were quite common
in the visual arts from late antiquity onward. The
scriptural episodes that were depicted were The
Creation of Adam, The Creation of Eve, Adam and Eve in
358
Encyclopedia of the Bible and Its Reception 1 ( Walter de Gruyter, Berlin/New York 2009)
359
the figures as signifying birth, death, and resurrection. It is unsurprising the story of Adam and Eve
occurred with a high degree of frequency in funerary art of the era.
b. Medieval and Renaissance. The medieval era included increased depictions of The Temptation and
the Fall of Adam and Eve in the visual arts. The pain
and suffering of their labors was more frequently
depicted (see /plate 5), as was the ultimate resurrection of the first humans by Christ in scenes of
The Anastasis of Christ. In representations of The Anastasis, Christ resurrects Adam and Eve by grasping
their hands (although Eves rescue is not entirely
consistent), as the image captured the removal of
the transgressions of the first couples sin. During
the Reformation, the Story of Adam and Eve was portrayed in altarpieces that effectively illustrated the
Protestant doctrine of the relationship between the
Law and the Gospel. Created by the Cranach workshop, The Temptation and the Fall labeled under the
rubric of Law was illustrated on one side, while
the Gospel narrative flanked the Hebrew Bible
scenes, with Adam acknowledging the impact of
the crucified Christ. The Renaissance reflected a renewed interest in scenes of the Creation of Adam and
Eve, epitomized in the climactic Sistine Chapel
scenes by Michelangelo. The visual evidence of the
Story of Adam and Eve exhibits its ability to operate
as a symbol of creation, birth, pain, vulnerability,
death, and resurrection.
Works: Creation of Eve: Bible, St. Paul outside the Walls,
Rome; Relief, San Zeno, Verona; Capital, Modena Cathedral; Portal, Church of Andlau, Alsace; Relief, Portal of the
Mother of God, Amiens Cathedral; elevated portal, Sainte
Chapelle, Paris; Mosaic, Baptistery, Florence; Venceslas Bible, Bibl. Vienna; Portal, Auxerre Cathedral, Burgundy; Faade, Orvieto Cathedral; Jacopo della Quercia, portal of S.
Petronio, Bologna; Ghiberti, bronze doors, Baptistery, Florence; Gabriel Guardia, altarpiece, Manresa; Portal, Church
of Ulm; Michelangelo, Sistine Chapel, Rome; Veronese,
(1570), The Art Institute of Chicago; William Blake, watercolor, Museum of Fine Arts, Boston. Presentation of Adam
and Eve: Sarcophagus, Muse de lArles Antiques, Arles.
Adam and Eve in the Garden of Paradise: Statue, Rouen Cathedral; Jan van Eyck, Ghent Altarpiece, St. Bavo Cathedral;
Antonio Rizzo, statues, Doges Palace, Venice; A. Drer,
(1507) Museo del Prado, Madrid; Jan Brueghel the Elder,
Royal Collection, UK; Jan von Scorel, Haarlem Museum.
Adam and Eve and the Institution of Marriage: Bronze doors,
Cathedral of Hildesheim; Fresco, St. Savin; Mosaic, Cathedral of Monreale; Relief portal, Cathedral of Freiburg.
The Temptation and the Fall: Fresco, Catacomb of S. Gennaro, Naples; Fresco, Catacomb of Peter and Marcellinus,
Rome; Fresco, Via Latina Catacomb, Rome; Sculpted frontal, Sarcophagus of Junius Bassus, Museo Pio Cristiano,
Rome; Miniature, Vienna Genesis; Bronze doors, Cathedral
of Hildesheim; Relief, faade, Modena Cathedral; Capital,
Cathedral of Cluny; Capital, Notre Dame-du-Port, Clermont-Ferrand; Capital, St. Benoit-sur-Loire; Fresco, St.
Savin; Statue, portal of the Mother of God, Amiens Cathedral; Relief, Auxerre Cathedral, Burgundy; Psalter of Queen
Mary, British Museum; Relief, Doges Palace, Venice; Paulo
Uccello, cloister, Santa Maria Novello, Florence; Hugo van
360
der Goes, Kunsthistorisches Museum, Vienna; Hans Holbein, Kunstmuseum Basel, Basel, Switzerland; Fernando
Gallego, altarpiece, Cathedral of Zamora; Jan van Scorel,
Haarlem Museum; Michelangelo, Sistine Chapel, Rome;
Raphael (1516) Vatican Apartments, Rome; Titian, Museo
del Prado, Madrid; Lucas Cranach, Uffizi, Florence; Peter
Paul Rubens, Museo del Prado, Madrid. The Expulsion
from Paradise (Adam and Eve Hiding Their Nudity): Capital,
Cluny Cathedral; Capital, St. Martin dAinay, Lyon; Mosaic,
Palatine Chapel, Palermo; North portal, Chartres Cathedral;
Relief, Orvieto Cathedral; Jan Van Eyck, Ghent altarpiece,
St. Bavo Cathedral; Rodin, Statue of Eve, the Gates of Hell,
Rodin Museum, Paris. (The Rebuke of God): Bronze doors,
Cathedral of Hildesheim; Relief, dome, Modena Cathedral;
Capital, Cathedral of Parma; Capital, Notre Dame-du-Port,
Clermont-Ferrand; North portal, Chartres Cathedral; Mosaic, San Marco, Venice. (Adam and Eve Given Instruments
of Labor): Sculpted frontal, Dogmatic Sarcophagus, Museo
Pio Cristiano, Rome; Mosaic, San Marco, Venice; Bronze
doors, Cathedral of Monreale, Sicily; Psalter of St. Alban,
Hildesheim; Miniature, Fitzwilliam Museum, Cambridge;
Stained glass, Sainte Chapelle, Paris; Psalter of Queen Mary,
British Museum; Portal, Rouen Cathedral; Western portal,
Church of Ulm; Arch, Portal of the Church of St. Thibault,
(Adam and Eve Chased out of Paradise): Bronze
Thann.
doors, Cathedral of Hildesheim; Capital, Notre Dame-duPort, Clermont-Ferrand; Byzantine ivory, Muse Olivieri,
Pesaro; Bronze doors, San Zeno, Verona; Faade, San Zeno,
Verona; Miniature, Psalter of St. Alban, Hildesheim; Relief,
Portal of the Mother of God, Amiens Cathedral; North portal, Chartres Cathedral; Latin Psalter, Bibl. Nat.; Sculpture,
transept, Cathedral of Worcester; Masaccio, fresco, Carmine
Chapel, Florence; Bertram von Minden, Grabow altarpiece,
Kunsthalle, Hamburg; Michelangelo, fresco, Sistine Chapel,
Rome; Raphael, Vatican Apartments, Rome. (Adam and
Eve Laboring): Mosaic, Baptistery, Florence; Bronze doors,
Cathedral of Hildesheim; Relief in the faade, Modena Cathedral; Relief, San Zeno, Verona; Fresco, Saint Savin,
Poitou; Mosaic, San Marco, Venice; North portal, Chartres
Cathedral; North faade, Amiens Cathedral; Foundation,
Cathedral of Bourges; Chapel, Salisbury Cathedral; Tympanum, Cathedral of Freiburg; Stained glass, Canterbury Cathedral; Ps. of Queen Mary, British Museum; Andrea Pisano, relief, S. Maria del Fiore, Florence; Ghiberti, bronze
doors, Baptistery, Florence; Cloister, Santa Maria Novello,
Florence; Jacopo della Quercia, portal of S. Petronio, Bologna; Stalls, Amiens Cathedral; Antonio Lombardo, relief,
Basilica of Lorette. (Eve Breastfeeding): Miniature, Bible of
St. Paul outside the Walls, Rome; Relief, faade, San Zeno,
Verona; Bronze doors, Cathedral of Hildesheim; Stained
glass, Cathedral of Tours; Relief, Library portal, Rouen Cathedral; Capital, Cathedral of Salisbury; Stained glass, St.
Etienne Temple of Mulhouse, Alsace; Stained glass depiction of Genesis, Cathedral of Chlons-sur-Marne. Adam
and Eve Bemoaning the Death of Abel: Lucas van Leyden, Univ.
of Michigan Museum. Anastasis: Mosaic, Hosios Lukas,
Distomo; Mosaic, Hagia Sophia, Istanbul; Fresco, Monastery of the Savior, Chora, Istanbul; Mosaic, main church,
Nea Moni, Chios.
Bibliography: F. W. Deichmann et al. (eds.), Repertorium
der christlich-antiken Sarcophage, Register I (Wiesbaden 1976)
37. L. Rau, Iconographie de lart chrtien, 2.1 (Paris 1988
[= 1956]) 65103. H. Schade, Adam und Eva, LCI 1
(Freiburg 1994 [= 1968]) 4170. J. Seibert, Adam und
Eva, LCK (Freiburg 1980) 1115.
Encyclopedia of the Bible and Its Reception 1 ( Walter de Gruyter, Berlin/New York 2009)
Lee M. Jefferson
361
VII. Music
Medieval Christian liturgy on Sexagesimae (or Septuagesimae) Sunday included the singing of responsories during the office giving an outline of
the biblical story of the Fall. Seven of these were
also included in the 12th century (otherwise spoken) Anglo-Norman Ordo representacionis Ade (Service
for Representing Adam), usually referred to as the
Play of Adam which belongs in the context of liturgical representation (or liturgical drama). The Play
of Adam elaborated the narrative from Genesis providing both Adam and Eve with individual characteristics as well as making references to a future
salvation in Christ. In Arnoul Grbans French language (spoken) Passion Play, Le Mystre de la Passion,
from the mid-15th century, an introductory monologue spoken by Adam provides the background for
the following representation of the salvation
through the Passion of Jesus.
Representations of the Story of Adam and Eve and
other representations of the figures of Adam and
Eve in vernacular (spoken) mystery plays, for instance the English Corpus Christi Plays, at least sometimes included music. In general, much research
needs to be done on the musical traditions of these
plays. Such research has so far mainly been carried
out for the English plays by Richard Rastall who
also points to the use of instrumental music to emphasize specific aspects of the Story of Adam and Eve.
The Story of Adam and Eve was represented in
oratorios since the beginning of the genre. Bonifazio Grazianis Adae oratorium (Rome 1650, The oratorio of Adam) and Baldassare Galuppis Adamo
caduto (Rome 1747, The fallen Adam) are examples
by famous composers, but many others are known
and very likely much at present remains to be
known. These representations are generally speaking newly composed poetical versions (textually as
well as musically) of the biblical story.
Sometimes Adam and Eve are portrayed in narrative connections not found in Genesis. Other representations synthesize particular parts of the Story
of Adam and Eve.
The most famous musical representation of biblical creation narratives is doubtless Die Schpfung
(The Creation) by Joseph Haydn. An English libretto based on Miltons Paradise Lost was given to
Haydn (in 1795) and reworked by Gottfried van
Swieten in German. When Haydn had finished the
composition, van Swieten adapted an English version of the libretto to the music. Die Schpfung was
premiered in 1798 in Vienna. Whereas the first two
parts of the work deal with the narrative of Gen 1,
the third part constitutes a cantata in which Adam
and Eve praise the Creation. The biblical account
of Adam and Eve is only implied through the
thankfulness of the newly created couple towards
the Creator, and the Fall is only touched upon in a
brief recitative sung by the archangel Uriel (here
quoted from the English version of the libretto):
362
Encyclopedia of the Bible and Its Reception 1 ( Walter de Gruyter, Berlin/New York 2009)
363
VIII. Film
A great many films from around the world have
borrowed the names Adam and Eve for use in
their titles: some filmmakers have sought to say
something about the biblical story, while others
have used these mythological names to tell other
stories, and still others use one or both characters
as comic figures. Most often, what is picked up in
the reception of these Genesis characters is a focus
on temptation, especially sexual.
Films attempting to base themselves in the biblical text include two Mexican films that are worth
mentioning, if only for their taglines. Adn y Eva
(dir. Albert Gout, 1956) carried the tagline, God
created a woman for man to live and play in
naked innocence in the Garden of Eden until a
serpent introduces Eve to devil and sex begins!
(ellipses in tagline). Gouts film was banned by censors in Mexico. In 1969, another Mexican production The Sin of Adam and Eve (dir. Miguel Zacaras)
carried the tagline, God created Adam. Eve created
the sin of Adam and Eve. And John Hustons The
Bible: In the Beginning (1966) covers Adam and Eve
in a swords and sandals Hollywood epic that yet
had little splash.
Comedies centering on the two characters include Roy Macks 1934 Good Morning, Eve! in which
Adam and Eve move out of the garden and into
later history, including time with Nero in Rome;
and the awful 2005 National Lampoon rendition,
Adam and Eve, which places the couple in a risqu,
collegiate environment.
A strange, though striking, representation of
the two Edenic characters occurs in director Mike
Figgis The Loss of Sexual Innocence (1999). The plotline intercuts a modern story with continual reference back to a bi-racial Adam and Eve who appear
from out of water and begin to explore the world,
including each other and their own bodies. The
film makes the myth relevant to any and all whose
loss of innocence connects with sexual innocence.
Relatedly, garden tropes feature prominently
in many films. Recent films include Hanging Garden
364
(1997), The Cement Garden (1993), and The Secret Garden (1993), each of which deals with tensions between innocence and experience, good and evil, especially when understood as being primarily
sexual. Adam and Eve figures are seen in characters
such as Julie and Jack from The Cement Garden.
One of the most striking references to the
Edenic figures comes at the halfway point of Wim
Wenders apocalyptic film, Until the End of the World
(1991). The otherwise convoluted film is redeemed
by a few choice scenes, one of the key ones being
that the two main characters fly a small plane
across the Australian outback as a feared nuclear
explosion takes place somewhere far off. Their
plane floats to earth as Peter Gabriels song The
Blood of Eden plays, and the woman and man begin
after the end of the world in a desert.
Bibliography: T. Linafelt/S. B. Plate, Seeing Beyond the
End of the World in Strange Days and Until the End of the
World, The Journal of Religion and Film 7.1 (2003; www.un A. Reinhartz,
omaha.edu/jrf, accessed July 28, 2008).
Scripture on the Silver Screen (Louisville, Ky. 2003).
S. Brent Plate
See also /Adam (Person); /Apple; /Eden,
Garden of; /Eve
Encyclopedia of the Bible and Its Reception 1 ( Walter de Gruyter, Berlin/New York 2009)