You are on page 1of 3

56858

Proposed Rules Federal Register


Vol. 70, No. 188

Thursday, September 29, 2005

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER and follow the instructions for sending person at the Docket Management
contains notices to the public of the proposed your comments electronically. Facility office between 9 a.m. and 5
issuance of rules and regulations. The • Mail: Docket Management Facility, p.m., Monday through Friday, except
purpose of these notices is to give interested U.S. Department of Transportation, 400 Federal holidays. The Docket
persons an opportunity to participate in the Seventh Street SW., Nassif Building, Management Facility office (telephone
rule making prior to the adoption of the final Room PL–401, Washington, DC 20590.
rules.
(800) 647–5227) is located on the plaza
• Fax: (202) 493–2251. level of the Nassif Building at the DOT
• Hand Delivery: Room PL–401 on street address stated in the ADDRESSES
the plaza level of the Nassif Building, section. Comments will be available in
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, the AD docket shortly after the Docket
Federal Aviation Administration DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday Management System receives them.
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in Discussion
14 CFR Part 39
this proposed AD, contact Empresa The Departmento de Aviacao Civil
[Docket No. FAA–2005–22525; Directorate Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A. (DAC), which is the airworthiness
Identifier 2005–NM–149–AD] (EMBRAER), P.O. Box 343—CEP 12.225, authority for Brazil, notified us that an
Sao Jose dos Campos—SP, Brazil. unsafe condition may exist on certain
RIN 2120–AA64
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: EMBRAER Model EMB–135BJ, –135ER,
Airworthiness Directives; Empresa Todd Thompson, Aerospace Engineer, –135KE, –135KL, and –135LR airplanes;
Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A. International Branch, ANM–116, FAA, and certain Model EMB–145, –145ER,
(EMBRAER) Model EMB–135BJ, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 –145MR, –145LR, –145XR, –145MP, and
–135ER, –135KE, –135KL, and –135LR Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington –145EP airplanes. Affected airplanes are
Airplanes; and Model EMB–145, 98055–4056; telephone (425) 227–1175; equipped with Airborne Model C–14
–145ER, –145MR, –145LR, –145XR, fax (425) 227–1149. auxiliary power units (APUs). The DAC
–145MP, and –145EP Airplanes SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: advises that it has received a report of
Comments Invited fuel leaking from the APU feeding line
AGENCY: Federal Aviation and accumulating inside the APU
Administration (FAA), Department of We invite you to submit any relevant
compartment because the drain system
Transportation (DOT). written data, views, or arguments
is inadequate when the APU is running.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking regarding this proposed AD. Include the
Fuel accumulation and subsequent
(NPRM). docket number ‘‘FAA–2005–22525;
flammable fuel vapors in the APU
Directorate Identifier 2005–NM–149–
cowling, combined with an ignition
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a AD’’ at the beginning of your comments.
source, if not corrected, could result in
new airworthiness directive (AD) for We specifically invite comments on the
ignition of fuel vapors and fire or
certain EMBRAER airplanes listed overall regulatory, economic,
explosion
above. This proposed AD would require environmental, and energy aspects of
modifying the drain system of the the proposed AD. We will consider all Relevant Service Information
auxiliary power unit (APU) by installing comments received by the closing date
and may amend the proposed AD in EMBRAER has issued Service
a scavenge pump and, for certain Bulletins 145LEG–49–0006 (for Model
airplanes, replacing the APU exhaust light of those comments.
We will post all comments we EMB–135BJ airplanes) and 145–49–0029
assembly. This proposed AD results (for all remaining affected airplanes),
from a report of fuel leaking from the receive, without change, to http://
dms.dot.gov, including any personal both dated April 20, 2005. The service
APU feeding line and accumulating bulletins describe procedures for
inside the APU compartment because information you provide. We will also
post a report summarizing each modifying the APU compartment drain
the drain system is inadequate when the system by installing a scavenge pump,
APU is running. We are proposing this substantive verbal contact with FAA
personnel concerning this proposed AD. supports, tubes, and hoses; and
AD to prevent fuel accumulation and reworking the APU installation by
subsequent flammable fuel vapors in the Using the search function of that web
site, anyone can find and read the removing a combustor drain hose and
APU cowling, which, combined with an installing an aluminum round bar to the
ignition source, could result in a fire or comments in any of our dockets,
including the name of the individual drain collector. For APUs having certain
explosion. cowlings, Service Bulletin 145–49–0029
who sent the comment (or signed the
DATES: We must receive comments on recommends the concurrent
comment on behalf of an association,
this proposed AD by October 31, 2005. business, labor union, etc.). You may accomplishment of the actions specified
ADDRESSES: Use one of the following review the DOT’s complete Privacy Act in EMBRAER Service Bulletin 145–49–
addresses to submit comments on this Statement in the Federal Register 0023. Service Bulletin 145–49–0023,
proposed AD. published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR Revision 01, dated April 25, 2005,
• DOT Docket Web site: Go to 19477–78), or you may visit http:// describes procedures for replacing the
http://dms.dot.gov and follow the dms.dot.gov. APU exhaust assembly with a new APU
instructions for sending your comments exhaust assembly. Accomplishing the
electronically. Examining the Docket actions specified in the service
• Government-wide rulemaking Web You may examine the AD docket on information is intended to adequately
site: Go to http://www.regulations.gov the Internet at http://dms.dot.gov, or in address the unsafe condition. The DAC

VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:16 Sep 28, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\29SEP1.SGM 29SEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 188 / Thursday, September 29, 2005 / Proposed Rules 56859

mandated the service information and Authority for This Rulemaking Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
issued Brazilian airworthiness directive Title 49 of the United States Code § 39.13 [Amended]
2005–08–05, effective September 6, specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
2005, to ensure the continued rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, 2. The Federal Aviation
airworthiness of these airplanes in section 106, describes the authority of Administration (FAA) amends § 39.13
Brazil. the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, by adding the following new
FAA’s Determination and Requirements Aviation Programs, describes in more airworthiness directive (AD):
of the Proposed AD detail the scope of the Agency’s Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A.
authority. (EMBRAER): Docket No. FAA–2005–
These airplane models are We are issuing this rulemaking under 22525; Directorate Identifier 2005–NM–
manufactured in Brazil and are type the authority described in subtitle VII, 159–AD.
certificated for operation in the United part A, subpart III, section 44701,
States under the provisions of section Comments Due Date
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
21.29 of the Federal Aviation section, Congress charges the FAA with (a) The FAA must receive comments on
Regulations (14 CFR 21.29) and the promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in this AD action by October 31, 2005.
applicable bilateral airworthiness air commerce by prescribing regulations Affected ADs
agreement. Pursuant to this bilateral for practices, methods, and procedures (b) None.
airworthiness agreement, the DAC has the Administrator finds necessary for
kept the FAA informed of the situation safety in air commerce. This regulation Applicability
described above. We have examined the is within the scope of that authority (c) This AD applies to EMBRAER Model
DAC’s findings, evaluated all pertinent because it addresses an unsafe condition EMB–135BJ, –135ER, –135KE, –135KL, and
information, and determined that we that is likely to exist or develop on –135LR airplanes; and Model EMB–145,
need to issue an AD for airplanes of this products identified in this rulemaking –145ER, –145MR, –145LR, –145XR, –145MP,
type design that are certificated for action. and –145EP airplanes; certificated in any
operation in the United States. category; equipped with Model C–14
Regulatory Findings auxiliary power units (APUs); except those
Therefore, we are proposing this AD,
which would require accomplishing the We have determined that this airplanes with serial numbers 14500927 and
actions specified in the service proposed AD would not have federalism subsequent.
information described previously, implications under Executive Order Unsafe Condition
except as discussed below. 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the (d) This AD results from a report of fuel
Difference Between Proposed AD and leaking from the APU feeding line and
States, on the relationship between the
Brazilian Airworthiness Directive accumulating inside the APU compartment
national Government and the States, or
because the drain system is inadequate when
The Brazilian airworthiness directive on the distribution of power and the APU is running. We are issuing this AD
applies to ‘‘all EMB–145( ) and EMB– responsibilities among the various to prevent fuel accumulation and subsequent
135( ) aircraft models in operation, levels of government. flammable fuel vapors in the APU cowling,
equipped with Model T–62T–40C14 For the reasons discussed above, I which, combined with an ignition source,
certify that the proposed regulation: could result in a fire or explosion.
APU.’’ This proposed AD would further
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
limit the applicability to airplanes Compliance
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
having serial numbers below 14500927. 2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the (e) You are responsible for having the
We have been informed that airplanes at DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures actions required by this AD performed within
and above that serial number will be (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and the compliance times specified, unless the
modified in production. This difference 3. Will not have a significant actions have already been done.
has been coordinated with the DAC. economic impact, positive or negative, Installation of Scavenge Pump Drain
Costs of Compliance on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory (f) Within 5,000 flight hours after the
This proposed AD would affect about effective date of this AD, modify the APU
Flexibility Act.
800 airplanes of U.S. registry. The compartment drain system by installing a
We prepared a regulatory evaluation
proposed pump installation would take scavenge pump on it by doing all actions
of the estimated costs to comply with specified in the Accomplishment
about 15 work hours per airplane, at an this proposed AD and placed it in the Instructions of EMBRAER Service Bulletin
average labor rate of $65 per work hour. AD docket. See the ADDRESSES section 145LEG–49–0006 (for Model EMB–135BJ
Required parts would cost about $1,768 for a location to examine the regulatory airplanes) or 145–49–0029 (for all remaining
or $1,967 per airplane. Based on these evaluation. airplanes), both dated April 20, 2005.
figures, the estimated cost of the
proposed AD for U.S. operators is List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 Concurrent Requirements
$2,194,400–$2,353,600, or $2,743 or Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation (g) For airplanes with an APU cowling part
$2,942 per airplane. safety, Safety. number (P/N) 145–52979–401 or 145–52979–
The number of airplanes subject to the 403: Before or concurrently with the pump
The Proposed Amendment drain installation required by paragraph (f) of
proposed APU exhaust assembly
replacement is unknown. If Accordingly, under the authority this AD, replace the APU exhaust assembly
delegated to me by the Administrator, by doing all actions specified in the
accomplished, this action would take
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part Accomplishment Instructions of EMBRAER
about 6–7 work hours per airplane, at an Service Bulletin 145–49–0023, Revision 01,
average labor rate of $65 per work hour. 39 as follows:
dated April 25, 2005. Replacement before the
Required parts would cost about $9,828 effective date of this AD in accordance with
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
or $12,844 per airplane. Based on these EMBRAER Service Bulletin 145–49–0023,
DIRECTIVES
figures, the estimated cost of the dated November 23, 2004, is also acceptable
proposed AD for U.S. operators is 1. The authority citation for part 39 for compliance with the requirements of this
$10,218–$13,299 per airplane. continues to read as follows: paragraph.

VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:16 Sep 28, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\29SEP1.SGM 29SEP1
56860 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 188 / Thursday, September 29, 2005 / Proposed Rules

Alternative Methods of Compliance for sending your comments business, labor union, etc.). You can
(AMOCs) electronically. review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
(h)(1) The Manager, International Branch, • Government-wide rulemaking Web Statement in the Federal Register
ANM–116, Transport Airplane Directorate, Site: Go to http://www.regulations.gov published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs and follow the instructions for sending 19477–78), or you can visit http://
for this AD, if requested in accordance with your comments electronically. dms.dot.gov.
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
(2) Before using any AMOC approved in • Mail: Docket Management Facility,
Examining the Docket
accordance with § 39.19 on any airplane to U.S. Department of Transportation, 400
which the AMOC applies, notify the Seventh Street SW., Nassif Building, You can examine the AD docket on
appropriate principal inspector in the FAA room PL–401, Washington, DC 20590. the Internet at http://dms.dot.gov, or in
Flight Standards Certificate Holding District • By Fax: (202) 493–2251. person at the Docket Management
Office. • Hand Delivery: Room PL–401 on Facility office between 9 a.m. and 5
Related Information the plaza level of the Nassif Building, p.m., Monday through Friday, except
400 Seventh Street SW., Washington, Federal holidays. The Docket
(i) Brazilian airworthiness directive 2005–
08–05, effective September 6, 2005, also DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday Management Facility office (telephone
addresses the subject of this AD. through Friday, except Federal holidays. (800) 647–5227) is located on the plaza
For service information identified in level of the Nassif Building at the DOT
Issued in Renton, Washington, on
September 16, 2005. this proposed AD, contact Boeing street address stated in the ADDRESSES
Commercial Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707, section. Comments will be available in
Ali Bahrami,
Seattle, Washington 98124–2207. the AD docket shortly after the DMS
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
You can examine the contents of this receives them.
Aircraft Certification Service.
AD docket on the Internet at http:// Discussion
[FR Doc. 05–19238 Filed 9–28–05; 8:45 am]
dms.dot.gov, or in person at the Docket
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
Management Facility, U.S. Department Boeing has completed extended
of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street pressure fatigue tests on a Boeing Model
SW., room PL–401, on the plaza level of 747SR and a 747–400 fuselage test
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION article. Boeing has also used updated
the Nassif Building, Washington, DC.
Federal Aviation Administration This docket number is FAA–2005– analysis methods on the 747 fuselage
22526; the directorate identifier for this structure. The tests and analysis have
14 CFR Part 39 docket is 2005–NM–008–AD. identified areas of the fuselage where
fatigue cracks can occur. This condition,
[Docket No. FAA–2005–22526; Directorate FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ivan
if not corrected, could result in loss of
Identifier 2005–NM–008–AD] Li, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe
the structural integrity of the fuselage
Branch, ANM–120S, FAA, Seattle
RIN 2120–AA64 and consequent rapid depressurization
Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind
of the airplane.
Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington
Airworthiness Directives; Boeing
98055–4056; telephone (425) 917–6437; Related AD
Model 747–200F, 747–200C, 747–400,
747–400D, and 747–400F Series fax (425) 917–6590. On May 14, 2002, we issued AD
Airplanes SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 2002–10–10, amendment 39–12756 (67
Comments Invited FR 36081, May 23, 2002). That AD
AGENCY: Federal Aviation applies to certain Boeing Model 747
Administration (FAA), Department of We invite you to submit any relevant airplanes. That AD requires repetitive
Transportation (DOT). written data, views, or arguments inspections to detect cracks in various
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking regarding this proposed AD. Send your areas of the fuselage internal structure,
(NPRM). comments to an address listed under and repair if necessary. This proposed
ADDRESSES. Include ‘‘Docket No. FAA– AD would require similar inspections
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a 2005–22526; Directorate Identifier
new airworthiness directive (AD) for all for Model 747 airplanes that are not
2005–NM–008–AD’’ in the subject line identified in the applicability of AD
Boeing Model 747–200F, 747–200C, of your comments. We specifically
747–400, 747–400D, and 747–400F 2002–10–10.
invite comments on the overall We also issued AD 2004–07–22,
series airplanes. This proposed AD regulatory, economic, environmental, amendment 39–13566 (69 FR 18250,
would require repetitive inspections for and energy aspects of the proposed AD. April 7, 2004), as corrected (69 FR
cracking of certain fuselage internal We will consider all comments 19618, April 13, 2005), and as further
structure, and repair if necessary. This submitted by the closing date and may corrected (69 FR 24063, May 3, 2005).
proposed AD is prompted by fatigue amend the proposed AD in light of those That AD applies to all Boeing Model
tests and analysis that identified areas of comments. 747 series airplanes and requires that
the fuselage where fatigue cracks can We will post all comments we the FAA-approved maintenance
occur. We are proposing this AD to receive, without change, to http:// inspection program be revised to
prevent loss of the structural integrity of dms.dot.gov, including any personal include inspections that will give no
the fuselage, which could result in rapid information you provide. We will also less than the required damage tolerance
depressurization of the airplane. post a report summarizing each rating for each structural significant
DATES: We must receive comments on substantive verbal contact with FAA item, and repair of cracked structure.
this proposed AD by November 14, personnel concerning this proposed AD.
2005. Using the search function of that Web Relevant Service Information
ADDRESSES: Use one of the following site, anyone can find and read the We have reviewed Boeing Alert
addresses to submit comments on this comments in any of our dockets, Service Bulletin 747–53A2500, dated
proposed AD. including the name of the individual December 21, 2004. Procedures for
• DOT Docket Web Site: Go to http:// who sent the comment (or signed the repetitive inspections for cracks are
dms.dot.gov and follow the instructions comment on behalf of an association, listed in the following table:

VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:16 Sep 28, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\29SEP1.SGM 29SEP1

You might also like