Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Summary
From 1999 to 2007 taxes in Florida were reduced by $19.3 billion (in 2007
dollars).
Data and Analysis
With the exception of the estate tax cut (discussed below), all tax measures
estimates are derived from the Fiscal Analysis in Brief.1 The Fiscal Analysis
in Brief provides two-year revenue forecasts for all legislative measures
affecting revenue during a legislative year. Legislative actions potentially
affecting revenue could impact general revenue, trust fund revenue, or local
revenue. The estimates presented below show the total changes from these
three revenue sources combined.
The two-year revenue estimates include cash estimates reflecting the
change in revenue in the two fiscal years following the legislative session.
For example, the 1999 Fiscal Analysis in Brief contains cash estimates for
changes in revenue for the 1999-00 and 2000-01 fiscal years. These data are
presented in Table 1.
Table 1. Cash Revenue Changes (Nominal Dollars)
First Fiscal Year
Second Fiscal Year
Revenue
Revenue
Change
Change
Legislati
Fiscal
(Millions
Fiscal
(Millions
ve Year
Year
)
Year
)
1999 1999-00
-$802 2000-00
-$685
2000 2000-00
-$450 2001-02
-$458
2001 2001-02
-$95 2002-03
-$89
2002 2002-03
-$215 2003-04
-$126
2003 2003-04
$176 2004-05
$96
2004 2004-05
-$92 2005-06
$158
2005 2005-06
-$103 2006-07
-$72
2006 2006-07
-$272 2007-08
-$282
Some of these tax changes are temporary tax cuts measures. For example,
sales tax holidays typically reduce taxes for only a single year. However,
other cuts are recurring tax reductions. The revenue effects from these
permanent reductions are not estimated beyond the two-year budget
window. Table 2 provides the value of these recurring cuts as reported by
1 The Fiscal Analysis in Brief (available here) is published annually by
Floridas Office of Economic & Demographic Research. The tax cut data
used for this analysis originate from the table entitled Measures Affecting
Revenue and Tax Administration.
the Fiscal Analysis in Brief. The second fiscal year recurring estimates are
used. For example, in the 1999 legislative session recurring tax cuts totaled
$660.3 million in the 1999-00 fiscal year and $681.7 in the 2000-01 fiscal
year. The analysis presented below uses the 2000-01 recurring cut of $681.7
as better estimates for how the revenue measures in the 1999 legislative
session would affect revenues in later years. Table 2 presents the second
fiscal year recurring estimates for each legislative year.
Legislative
Year
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
Recurring
Revenue
Change
(Millions)
-681.7
-452.4
-138.5
14.3
120.5
167.5
-66.4
Fiscal Year
of Recurring
Amount
2000-01
2001-02
2002-03
2003-04
2004-05
2005-06
2006-07
Total
State
and
Local
Revenue
(Billions
)
92.85
93.3
111.15
129
132.25
135.5
153.1
Recurring
Revenue
Change as % of
Total Revenue
-0.7%
-0.5%
-0.1%
0.0%
0.1%
0.1%
0.0%
Notes: Historical revenue data is the total of state and local revenue for each year as
reported by the U.S. Census Bureau, State and Local Government Finance, available
here. The Census Bureau does not provide revenue data for the 1999-00 and 2001-02
fiscal years. The average of the preceding and subsequent fiscal years are used for the
calculation. Also note that the recurring amount for the 2006 legislative year is excluded
as the calculations below do not extend beyond the 2007-08 fiscal year, and thus the
recurring estimate is unnecessary.
Table 3. Nominal Revenue Changes from Cash and Recurring Estimates (Millions)
Legislat Fiscal Year
Total
ive Year
Revenue
Change
From
Specific
Legislati
Session
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
Total
199900
200000
200102
200203
200304
200405
200506
200607
200708
-802
-685
-685
-816
-947
-971
-995
-450
-458
-95
-539
-89
-215
-626
-161
-126
176
-641
-165
15
96
-92
-657
-169
15
123
158
-103
-1134
-1238
-1659
-1683
-1758
-1627
1124
-742
-191
17
139
189
-72
-272
-2056
1270
-839
-216
19
158
214
-75
-282
-2291
-802
-8295
-4951
-1085
-275
693
469
-250
-554
-14248
2,14
2
2,34
4
2,44
2
2,50
0
2,91
5
3,13
9
19,2
97