Proposed Rule: Airworthiness Directives

54668 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No.
179 / Friday, September 16, 2005 / Proposed Rules
Egg white lysozyme (CAS # 9001–63– agent in agricultural products labeled initial inspections and reduce the
2) ‘‘made with organic (specified repetitive interval for a certain
* * * * * ingredients or food group(s));’’ inspection. This proposed AD is
L-Malic acid (CAS # 97–67–6). prohibited in handling agricultural prompted by new reports of cracks in
* * * * * products labeled ‘‘organic.’’ the upper deck floor beams occurring at
Microorganisms—any food grade * * * * * lower flight cycles. We are proposing
bacteria, fungi, and other Tetrasodium pyrophosphate (CAS # this AD to find and fix cracking in
microorganism. 7722–88–5)—for use only in meat certain upper deck floor beams. Such
* * * * * analog products labeled ‘‘made with cracking could extend and sever floor
(b) * * * organic (specified ingredients or food beams at a floor panel attachment hole
Activated charcoal (CAS #s 7440–44– group(s));’’ prohibited in handling location and could result in rapid
0; 64365–11–3)—only from vegetative agricultural products labeled ‘‘organic.’’ decompression and loss of
sources; for use only as a filtering aid in * * * * * controllability of the airplane.
handling agricultural products labeled 4. In § 205.681, paragraph (d)(1) is DATES: We must receive comments on
‘‘made with organic (specified revised to read as follows: this proposed AD by October 31, 2005.
ingredients or food group(s));’’ ADDRESSES: Use one of the following
prohibited in handling agricultural § 205.681 Appeals. addresses to submit comments on this
products labeled ‘‘organic.’’ * * * * * proposed AD.
* * * * * (d) * * * (1) Appeals to the • DOT Docket Web site:
Ammonium hydroxide (CAS # 1336– Administrator must be filed in writing Go to http://dms.dot.gov and follow the
21–6)—for use only as a boiler water and addressed to: Administrator, USDA, instructions for sending your comments
additive until October 21, 2005. AMS, c/o NOP Appeals Staff, Stop 0203, electronically.
Restricted to handling agricultural Room 3529–S, 1400 Independence • Government-wide rulemaking Web
products labeled ‘‘made with organic Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250– site: Go to http://www.regulations.gov
(specified ingredients or food 0203 and follow the instructions for sending
group(s));’’ prohibited in handling * * * * * your comments electronically.
agricultural products labeled ‘‘organic.’’ • Mail: Docket Management Facility;
Dated: September 12, 2005.
* * * * * U.S. Department of Transportation, 400
Lloyd C. Day, Seventh Street SW., Nassif Building,
Cyclohexylamine (CAS # 108–91–8)—
for use only as a boiler water additive Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Room PL–401, Washington, DC 20590.
Service. • Fax: (202) 493–2251.
for packaging sterilization. Restricted to
handling agricultural products labeled [FR Doc. 05–18381 Filed 9–15–05; 8:45 am] • Hand Delivery: Room PL–401 on
‘‘made with organic (specified BILLING CODE 3410–02–P the plaza level of the Nassif Building,
ingredients or food group(s));’’ 400 Seventh Street SW., Washington,
prohibited in handling agricultural DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
products labeled ‘‘organic.’’ DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Diethylaminoethanol (CAS # 100–37– For service information identified in
8)—for use only as a boiler water Federal Aviation Administration this proposed AD, contact Boeing
additive for packaging sterilization. Commercial Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707,
Restricted to handling agricultural 14 CFR Part 39 Seattle, Washington 98124–2207.
products labeled ‘‘made with organic [Docket No. FAA–2005–22423; Directorate
You can examine the contents of this
(specified ingredients or food Identifier 2005–NM–068–AD] AD docket on the Internet at http://
group(s));’’ prohibited for use in dms.dot.gov, or in person at the Docket
handling agricultural products labeled RIN 2120–AA64 Management Facility, U.S. Department
‘‘organic.’’ of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street
Airworthiness Directives; Boeing SW., room PL–401, on the plaza level of
* * * * *
Octadecylamine (CAS # 124–30–1)— Model 747–200C and –200F Series the Nassif Building, Washington, DC.
for use only as a boiler water additive Airplanes This docket number is FAA–2005–
for packaging sterilization. Restricted to AGENCY: Federal Aviation 22423; the directorate identifier for this
handling agricultural products labeled Administration (FAA), Department of docket is 2005–NM–068–AD.
‘‘made with organic (specified Transportation (DOT). FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ivan
ingredients or food group(s));’’ ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking Li, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe
prohibited for use in handling (NPRM). Branch, ANM–120S, FAA, Seattle
agricultural products labeled ‘‘organic.’’ Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind
* * * * * SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington
Peracetic acid/Peroxyacetic acid (CAS supersede an existing airworthiness 98055–4056; telephone (425) 917–6437;
# 79–21–0)—for use in wash and/or directive (AD) that applies to certain fax (425) 917–6590.
rinse water according to FDA Boeing Model 747–200C and –200F SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
limitations. For use as a sanitizer on series airplanes. The existing AD
food contact surfaces. Restricted to use currently requires repetitive inspections Comments Invited
in handling agricultural products to find fatigue cracking in the upper We invite you to submit any relevant
labeled ‘‘made with organic (specified chord of the upper deck floor beams, written data, views, or arguments
ingredients or food group(s));’’ and repair if necessary. For certain regarding this proposed AD. Send your
prohibited in handling agricultural airplanes, the existing AD also provides comments to an address listed under
products labeled ‘‘organic.’’ an optional repair/modification, which ADDRESSES. Include ‘‘Docket No. FAA–
* * * * * extends certain repetitive inspection 2005–22423; Directorate Identifier
Sodium acid pyrophosphate (CAS # intervals. This proposed AD would 2005–NM–068–AD’’ at the beginning of
7758–16–9)—for use only as a leavening reduce the compliance time for all your comments. We specifically invite
VerDate Aug<31>2005 18:38 Sep 15, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16SEP1.SGM 16SEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 179 / Friday, September 16, 2005 / Proposed Rules 54669
comments on the overall regulatory, the upper deck floor beams on several service bulletin described previously,
economic, environmental, and energy airplanes. The airplanes had except as discussed under ‘‘Differences
aspects of the proposed AD. We will accumulated between 19,580 and 23,561 Between the Proposed AD and Service
consider all comments received by the total flight cycles. In one case, the aft Bulletin.’’
closing date and may amend the reinforcing strap of the upper chord of
Differences Between the Proposed AD
proposed AD in light of those the floor beam at station 520 was found
comments. severed at 19,580 total flight cycles. and Service Bulletin
We will post all comments we Another airplane with 19,687 total flight The service bulletin provides the
receive, without change, to http:// cycles had significant cracks in the same following information in Note 9 of the
dms.dot.gov, including any personal area. The threshold for the initial Accomplishment Instructions: ‘‘For the
information you provide. We will also inspection required by AD 2004–03–11 purposes of this service bulletin, do not
post a report summarizing each is 22,000 total flight cycles. Therefore, count flight-cycles with a cabin pressure
substantive verbal contact with FAA we have determined that the initial differential of 2.0 psi or less. However,
personnel concerning this proposed AD. inspections and a certain repetitive any flight-cycle with momentary spikes
Using the search function of our docket inspection required by that AD need to in cabin pressure differential above 2.0
Web site, anyone can find and read the be done earlier to detect cracks in the psi must be included as a full-pressure
comments in any of our dockets, upper deck floor beams in a timely flight-cycle.’’ We have determined that
including the name of the individual manner. an adjustment of flight cycles due to a
who sent the comment (or signed the lower cabin differential pressure is not
Relevant Service Information
comment on behalf of an association, substantiated and will not be allowed
business, labor union, etc.). You can We have reviewed Revision 1 of for use in determining the flight cycle
review the DOT’s complete Privacy Act Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747– threshold for this proposed AD.
Statement in the Federal Register 53A2439, dated March 10, 2005. The The service bulletin specifies that you
published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR inspections, repair, and optional repair/ may contact the manufacturer for
19477–78), or you can visit http:// modification described in Revision 1 are instructions on how to repair certain
dms.dot.gov. essentially identical to those in the conditions, but this proposed AD would
original issue, which is referenced in require you to repair those conditions in
Examining the Docket AD 2004–03–11 as the appropriate one of the following ways:
You can examine the AD docket on source of service information for the • Using a method that we approve; or
the Internet at http://dms.dot.gov, or in required actions. Revision 1 reduces the • Using data that meet the
person at the Docket Management compliance time for all initial certification basis of the airplane, and
Facility office between 9 a.m. and 5 inspections and reduces the repetitive that have been approved by an
p.m., Monday through Friday, except inspection interval for surface high Authorized Representative for the
Federal holidays. The Docket frequency eddy current (HFEC) Boeing Delegation Option Authorization
Management Facility office (telephone inspection of the upper deck floor Organization whom we have authorized
(800) 647–5227) is located on the plaza beams (header beams) at STAs 440 and to make those findings.
level of the Nassif Building at the DOT 520. The compliance time for Although the Accomplishment
street address stated in the ADDRESSES accomplishing the inspection of Instructions of the service bulletin
section. Comments will be available in repaired areas ranges between 5,000 and describe procedures for submitting
the AD docket shortly after the Docket 15,000 flight cycles depending on the inspection results to Boeing, this
Management System (DMS) receives diameter of the fastener hole. proposed AD would not require that
them. Accomplishing the actions specified in action. We do not need this information
the service information is intended to from operators.
Discussion adequately address the unsafe
On January 29, 2004, we issued AD condition. Change to Existing AD
2004–03–11, amendment 39–13455 (69 This proposed AD would retain
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
FR 5920, February 9, 2004), for certain certain requirements of AD 2004–03–11.
of the Proposed AD
Boeing Model 747–200C and –200F Since AD 2004–03–11 was issued, the
series airplanes. That AD requires The unsafe condition described AD format has been revised, and certain
repetitive inspections to find fatigue previously is likely to exist or develop paragraphs have been rearranged. As a
cracking in the upper chord of certain on other airplanes of the same type result, the corresponding paragraph
upper deck floor beams, and repair if design that may be registered in the U.S. identifiers have changed in this
necessary. For certain airplanes, that AD at some time in the future. We are proposed AD, as listed in the following
also provides an optional repair/ proposing to supersede AD 2004–03–11. table:
modification, which extends certain This proposed AD would continue to
repetitive inspection intervals. That AD require repetitive inspections to find REVISED PARAGRAPH IDENTIFIERS
was prompted by a report of fatigue fatigue cracking in the upper chord of
cracking of the station (STA) 340 upper the upper deck floor beams, and repair Corresponding
if necessary. This proposed AD would Requirement in AD
deck floor beam. We issued that AD to requirement in
2004–03–11
find and fix cracking in certain upper also continue to provide, for certain this proposed AD
deck floor beams. Such cracking could airplanes, an optional repair/
modification, which extends certain Paragraph (a) ......... Paragraphs (f) and (g).
extend and sever floor beams at a floor Paragraph (b) ......... Paragraph (h).
panel attachment hole location and repetitive inspection intervals. This
could result in rapid decompression and proposed AD would also reduce the
compliance time for all initial Costs of Compliance
loss of controllability of the airplane.
inspections and reduce the repetitive There are about 78 airplanes of the
Actions Since Existing AD Was Issued interval for a certain inspection. The affected design in the worldwide fleet.
Since we issued AD 2004–03–11, we actions would be required to be This proposed AD would affect about 21
have received new reports of cracks in accomplished in accordance with the airplanes of U.S. registry.
54670 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 179 / Friday, September 16, 2005 / Proposed Rules
The inspections that are required by The Proposed Amendment this AD: Before the accumulation of 15,000
AD 2004–03–11 and retained in this total flight cycles, or within 1,000 flight
Accordingly, under the authority cycles after the effective date of this AD,
proposed AD take about 29 work hours delegated to me by the Administrator, whichever occurs later.
per airplane, at an average labor rate of the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
$65 per work hour. Based on these Inspections at Reduced Intervals for Certain
39 as follows: Floor Beams and Repair
figures, the estimated cost of the
currently required inspections for U.S. PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS (g) Do the applicable inspection to find
airplanes is $39,585, or $1,885 per fatigue cracking in the upper chord of the
DIRECTIVES
upper deck floor beams as specified in Part
airplane, per inspection cycle.
1. The authority citation for part 39 1 (Open-Hole High Frequency Eddy Current
Authority for This Rulemaking continues to read as follows: (HFEC) Inspection Method) or Part 2 (Surface
HFEC Inspection Method) of the Work
Title 49 of the United States Code Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue § 39.13 [Amended]
747–53A2439, dated July 5, 2001. Do the
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, inspections per the service bulletin. As of the
Section 106, describes the authority of 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by effective date of this AD, the actions must be
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, removing amendment 39–13455 (69 FR done per the Work Instructions of Boeing
Aviation Programs, describes in more 5920, February 9, 2004) and adding the Alert Service Bulletin 747–53A2439,
following new airworthiness directive Revision 1, dated March 10, 2005.
detail the scope of the Agency’s (1) If any crack is found, before further
authority. (AD):
flight, repair per Part 3 (Upper Chord Repair)
We are issuing this rulemaking under Boeing: Docket No. FAA–2005–22423; of the Work Instructions of the service
Directorate Identifier 2005–NM–068–AD. bulletin; except where the service bulletin
the authority described in Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, Comments Due Date specifies to contact Boeing for appropriate
action, before further flight, repair according
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that (a) The Federal Aviation Administration to a method approved by the Manager,
section, Congress charges the FAA with must receive comments on this AD action by Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in October 31, 2005. FAA; or according to data meeting the
air commerce by prescribing regulations Affected ADs certification basis of the airplane approved
for practices, methods, and procedures by an a Boeing Company Designated
(b) This AD supersedes AD 2004–03–11, Engineering Representative (DER) or
the Administrator finds necessary for
amendment 39–13455. Authorized Representative for the Boeing
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority Applicability Delegation Option Authorization
Organization who has been authorized by the
because it addresses an unsafe condition (c) This AD applies to Boeing Model 747–
Manager, Seattle ACO, to make such
that is likely to exist or develop on 200C and –200F series airplanes, certificated
findings. For a repair method to be approved
products identified in this rulemaking in any category, as listed in Boeing Alert by the Manager, Seattle ACO, as required by
action. Service Bulletin 747–53A2439, dated July 5, this paragraph, the Manager’s approval letter
2001. must specifically reference this AD. Do the
Regulatory Findings applicable inspection of the repaired area per
Unsafe Condition
We have determined that this Part 1 of the Work Instructions of the service
(d) This AD was prompted by new reports
proposed AD would not have federalism bulletin at the applicable time per Part 3 of
of cracks in the upper deck floor beams
the Work Instructions of the service bulletin,
implications under Executive Order occurring at lower flight cycles. We are
and repeat the applicable inspection at the
13132. This proposed AD would not issuing this AD to find and fix cracking in
applicable interval per Figure 1 of the service
have a substantial direct effect on the certain upper deck floor beams, which could
bulletin. As of the effective date of this AD,
States, on the relationship between the extend and sever floor beams at a floor panel do the applicable inspection of the repaired
attachment hole location and could result in
National Government and the States, or area per Parts 1 and 6 of the Work
rapid decompression and loss of Instructions of the service bulletin at the
on the distribution of power and controllability of the airplane.
responsibilities among the various applicable time per Table 1 of Part 3 of the
levels of government. Compliance Work Instructions of the service bulletin, and
repeat the applicable inspection thereafter at
For the reasons discussed above, I (e) You are responsible for having the
intervals not to exceed 3,000 flight cycles.
certify that the proposed regulation: actions required by this AD performed within
(2) If no crack is found, repeat the
the compliance times specified, unless the
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory applicable inspection per paragraph (g) of
actions have already been done.
action’’ under Executive Order 12866; this AD at the applicable time specified in
Requirements of AD 2004–03–11 paragraphs (g)(2)(i) through (g)(2)(iii) of this
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the AD. As an option, accomplishment of
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures Initial Compliance Time at a New Reduced
paragraph (h)(1) or (h)(2) of this AD, before
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and Threshold
further flight, extends the threshold for the
3. Will not have a significant (f) At the earliest of the times specified in initiation of the repetitive inspections
economic impact, positive or negative, paragraphs (f)(1) through (f)(3) of this AD, do required by this paragraph.
the inspection required by paragraph (g) of (i) If the open-hole HFEC inspection
on a substantial number of small entities this AD. method was used: Repeat that inspection at
under the criteria of the Regulatory (1) Before the accumulation of 22,000 total intervals not to exceed 3,000 flight cycles.
Flexibility Act. flight cycles, or within 1,000 flight cycles (ii) If the surface HFEC inspection method
We prepared a regulatory evaluation after March 15, 2004 (the effective date of AD was used at stations 340 through 420
of the estimated costs to comply with 2004–03–11), whichever occurs later. inclusive and station 500: Repeat that
this proposed AD. See the ADDRESSES (2) For airplanes with 17,000 or more total inspection at intervals not to exceed 750
section for a location to examine the flight cycles as of the effective date of this flight cycles.
AD: Before the accumulation of 18,000 total (iii) If the surface HFEC inspection method
regulatory evaluation.
flight cycles, or within 90 days after the was used at stations 440 and 520: Repeat that
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 effective date of this AD, whichever occurs inspection at the earlier of the times specified
later. in paragraphs (g)(2)(iii)(A) and (g)(2)(iii)(B) of
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation (3) For airplanes with fewer than 17,000 this AD, and thereafter at intervals not to
safety, Safety. total flight cycles as of the effective date of exceed 250 flight cycles.
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 179 / Friday, September 16, 2005 / Proposed Rules 54671
(A) Within 750 flight cycles since the last Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs) explosion and consequent loss of the
surface HFEC inspection required by (k)(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft airplane.
paragraph (g) of this AD. Certification Office (SACO), FAA, has the
(B) Within 250 flight cycles after the DATES: We must receive comments on
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
effective date of this AD. this proposed AD by October 17, 2005.
requested in accordance with the procedures
Optional Repair/Modification found in 14 CFR 39.19. ADDRESSES: Use one of the following
(h) For airplanes on which the inspection (2) An AMOC that provides an acceptable addresses to submit comments on this
required by paragraph (g) of this AD is done level of safety may be used for any repair proposed AD.
per Part 1 of the Work Instructions of Boeing required by this AD, if it is approved by an • DOT Docket Web site: Go to
Alert Service Bulletin 747–53A2439, dated Authorized Representative for the Boeing http://dms.dot.gov and follow the
July 5, 2001, or Revision 1, dated March 10, Delegation Option Authorization instructions for sending your comments
2005; and on which no cracking is found: Organization who has been authorized by the electronically.
Accomplishment of the actions specified in Manager, Seattle ACO, to make those • Government-wide rulemaking Web
either paragraph (h)(1) or (h)(2) of this AD findings. For a repair method to be approved,
the repair must meet the certification basis of
site: Go to http://www.regulations.gov
extends the threshold for the initiation of the
repetitive inspections required by paragraph the airplane, and the approval must and follow the instructions for sending
(g)(2) of this AD. For airplanes on which the specifically refer to this AD. your comments electronically.
inspection required by paragraph (g) of this (3) AMOCs approved previously according • Mail: Docket Management Facility,
AD is done per Part 2 of the Work to AD 2004–03–11 are approved as AMOCs U.S. Department of Transportation, 400
Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin for the corresponding provisions of Seventh Street SW., Nassif Building,
747–53A2439, dated July 5, 2001, or Revision paragraphs (f) and (g) of this AD. Room PL–401, Washington, DC 20590.
1, dated March 10, 2005; and on which no • Fax: (202) 493–2251.
cracking is found: Accomplishment of the Issued in Renton, Washington, on
September 7, 2005. • Hand Delivery: Room PL–401 on
actions specified in paragraph (h)(1) of this
AD extends the threshold for the initiation of Kalene C. Yanamura, the plaza level of the Nassif Building,
the repetitive inspections required by Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
400 Seventh Street SW., Washington,
paragraph (g)(2) of this AD. Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
(1) Do the applicable repair per Part 3 of [FR Doc. 05–18403 Filed 9–15–05; 8:45 am]
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
the Work Instructions of the service bulletin. Contact British Aerospace, Service
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
At the applicable time specified in Table 1 Support, Airbus Limited, P.O. Box 77,
of Part 3 of the Work Instructions of the Bristol BS99 7AR, England, for service
service bulletin, do the applicable inspection information identified in this proposed
of the repaired area per Part 1 of the Work DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Instructions of the service bulletin. Repeat
AD.
the inspection thereafter within the Federal Aviation Administration FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
applicable interval per Figure 1 of the service Todd Thompson, Aerospace Engineer,
bulletin. As of the effective date of this AD, 14 CFR Part 39 International Branch, ANM–116, FAA,
the actions must be done per Parts 1, 3, and Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
6 of the Work Instructions of Boeing Alert [Docket No. FAA–2005–22427; Directorate
Identifier 2004–NM–263–AD]
Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington
Service Bulletin 747–53A2439, Revision 1,
98055–4056; telephone (425) 227–1175;
dated March 10, 2005, as applicable, and RIN 2120–AA64
repeat the applicable inspection thereafter at fax (425) 227–1149.
intervals not to exceed 3,000 flight cycles. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Airworthiness Directives; British
(2) Do the modification of the attachment
hole of the floor panel per Figure 5 of the Aerospace Model BAC 1–11 200 and Comments Invited
service bulletin. Within 10,000 flight cycles 400 Series Airplanes We invite you to submit any relevant
after accomplishment of the modification, do AGENCY: Federal Aviation written data, views, or arguments
the inspection of the modified area per Part regarding this proposed AD. Include the
1 of the Work Instructions of the service
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT). docket number ‘‘Docket No. FAA–2005–
bulletin. Repeat the inspection thereafter
within the applicable interval per Figure 1 of ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking 22427; Directorate Identifier 2004–NM–
the service bulletin. As of the effective date (NPRM). 263–AD’’ at the beginning of your
of this AD, the actions must be done per comments. We specifically invite
Figure 5 and Part 1 of the Work Instructions SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a comments on the overall regulatory,
of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747– new airworthiness directive (AD) for all economic, environmental, and energy
53A2439, Revision 1, dated March 10, 2005, British Aerospace Model BAC 1–11 200 aspects of the proposed AD. We will
and repeat the inspection thereafter at and 400 series airplanes. This proposed consider all comments received by the
intervals not to exceed 3,000 flight cycles. AD would require revising the airplane closing date and may amend the
Determining the Number of Flight Cycles for flight manual (AFM) to contain proposed AD in light of those
Compliance Time applicable AFM amendments, which comments.
(i) For the purposes of calculating the advise the flightcrew of information We will post all comments we
compliance threshold and repetitive intervals pertaining to safely operating the fuel receive, without change, to http://
for actions required by paragraphs (f), (g), or system. The proposed AD would also dms.dot.gov, including any personal
(h) of this AD: As of the effective date of this require revising the FAA-approved information you provide. We will also
AD, all flight cycles, including the number of
flight cycles in which cabin differential maintenance program to include certain post a report summarizing each
pressure is at 2.0 pounds per square inch repetitive maintenance tasks intended to substantive verbal contact with FAA
(psi) or less, must be counted when improve the safety of the fuel system. personnel concerning this proposed AD.
determining the number of flight cycles that This proposed AD results from fuel Using the search function of our docket
have occurred on the airplane. system reviews conducted by the Web site, anyone can find and read the
No Reporting Requirement manufacturer. We are proposing this AD comments in any of our dockets,
(j) Although the service bulletin referenced to prevent potential ignition sources including the name of the individual
in this AD specifies to submit certain inside the fuel system, which, in who sent the comment (or signed the
information to the manufacturer, this AD combination with flammable fuel comment on behalf of an association,
does not include that requirement. vapors, could result in a fuel tank business, labor union, etc.). You may

Proposed Rule: Airworthiness Directives

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Proposed Rule: Airworthiness Directives

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

54668 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No.

179 / Friday, September 16, 2005 / Proposed Rules

You might also like