Professional Documents
Culture Documents
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 22 January 2008
Received in revised form 24 May 2008
Accepted 27 May 2008
Available online 10 June 2008
Keywords:
Multi-effect evaporators
Economic evaluation
Net Present Value
Quality
Lycopene
Process optimization
a b s t r a c t
Agro industry is a very important industrial sector worldwide, especially for countries like New Zealand
and Chile. The main objective of this research was to propose a new economic evaluation procedure to
optimize the design and operation of multiple effect evaporators and compare it with the traditional
chemical engineering approach of total cost minimization. The proposed strategy incorporates a quality
factor expressed as a function of lycopene concentration on the nal product to nd the optimal number
of effects and operating conditions through the maximization of the net present value.
The mathematical model was implemented using Microsoft Excel and considered mass and energy balances, specic relations for tomato concentration and a rst order degradation kinetic for lycopene. The
results indicate that when augmenting the capacity of the evaporation system of 5 effects from 50 to
75 Ton/h, the lycopene retention increases from 95.25% to 96.27%. When evaluating the system through
the logic of the total cost minimization, an optimum of 4 effects is found, but when evaluating the system
using the maximization of the Net Present Value including lycopene as a quality parameter, the optimum
is 3 effects.
It appears of extreme relevance to consider quality as an intrinsic and integral part of the process
design, as it will then be possible to identify several potential improvements in different food processes.
2008 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
1. Introduction
Process optimization has always been a noble objective of engineers entrusted with the responsibility for process development
and improvement throughout the food industry. Examples of
sophisticated mathematical approaches to process optimization,
in which some objective function is maximized or minimized
subject to chosen constraints, are widely published in literature
(Douglas, 1988). On the other hand, the chemical industry has used
cost analysis in several cases in relation to design and process optimization. A classical example in the chemical industry is the determination of the optimal number of effects in a evaporation system,
were the optimum is found when there is an economic balance between energy saving and added investment, this is, a minimization
of the total cost (Kern, 1999). In this vision, although correctly, quality is not considered as a parameter in the determination of the optimum number of effects, so the process specications and operating
conditions are assumed independent of both product quality as its
sale price. The purpose of this manuscript is to suggest that the
extrapolation of optimization problems from chemical industry to
the food industry may often be restricted to an unnecessarily narrow or local domain, and that a more global perspective may reap
* Corresponding author. Tel.: +56 32 2654302; fax: +56 32 2654478.
E-mail address: ricardo.simpson@usm.cl (R. Simpson).
0260-8774/$ - see front matter 2008 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
doi:10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2008.05.033
489
Nomenclature
A
Cu
Cp
Deb
E
F
H
i
I
k
k0
K0
M
m
n
NPV
O
by 45%, in a population of 48,000 subjects who had at least 10 rations of tomatoes or sub products in their weekly diet. Other research discovered that lycopene also reduces cholesterol levels in
the form of a lipoprotein of low density (LDL), which produces atherosclerosis; this means that the consumption of tomatoes reduces
the effects produced by cardiovascular diseases.
Lycopene as the main organic compound presents a denaturalization reaction rate that is time and temperature dependent. Then,
for the mathematical model of the behavior of multi-effect evaporators, it is very important to have a good overview of the general
uctuation of lycopene retention or loss under different system designs and operating conditions.
As aforementioned, most food processes have been adapted and
extrapolated from the chemical engineering industry without an
adequate consideration of product quality during system design
and process optimization. That is certainly a good start, but maybe
somewhat limited and might have inhibited us to take a more global view. For example, it appears of extreme relevance to consider
quality more frequently as an intrinsic and integral part of process
design. In the food industry, the main effort is commonly related to
the maximization of the quality of the product, which is not necessarily the case in the chemical industry. Generally the optimization
of food processes have been restricted to determining the optimal
operating conditions of an allegedly, well designed food process.
Nevertheless, if quality is considered as a parameter in the system
design, it is very probable that the new design will differ from the
original one.
For example, in the case of a multiple effect evaporator system
for the processing of tomatoes, the optimization of the design is
only focused on an economic analysis which combines the investment (number of effects) and the operating costs (steam consumption) (Kern, 1999). This strategy does not include quality as an
integral part of the economic evaluation, even though previous
studies have demonstrated the dependence of the nal product
price towards quality of the nal product (Schoorl and Holt, 1983).
The main objective of this research work is to propose a new
economic evaluation procedure to optimize the system design
and operation of tomato juice, multiple effect evaporator and compare it to the traditional chemical engineering approach of total
cost minimization. The proposed strategy will incorporate a quality
factor which will be expressed as a function of lycopene concentration on the nal product to nd the optimal number of effects and
operating conditions through the maximization of the Net Present
Value (NPV).
P
Pu
Q
Q*j
R
T
t
X
Y
pressure (kPa)
unit sales price (US$/kg)
heat ow (kJ)
annual production at period j (units/year)
ideal gases constant (CkJ/mol)
temperature (C)
time (h)
concentration of soluble solids, kg ss/kg
lycopene concentration kgL/kg ss
Subscripts
c
condensing
d
download
e
cooling
i
evaporator effect, i
j
evaluation period, j
p
losses
2. Methodology
2.1. Problem description
Cost analysis has been extensively and correctly utilized in nding the best process design in several chemical engineering plants.
A classical example is multi-effect distillation. In this case, cost
analysis should aim to determine the optimum number of effects
in multiple-stage equipment. According to the literature in chemical engineering The optimum number of effects must be found from
an economic balance between the savings in steam obtained by multiple effect operation and added investment. It is important to elucidate whether the aforementioned approach is recommendable in
the optimization of food processes? From a microeconomics point
of view, this approach is correct but, it is important to consider that
the different equipment congurations are producing exactly the
same quality of the end product. Meaning that, independent of
the number of effects, not only will we be able to reach the same degree of concentration, but also the same quality. In addition, by
changing the equipment conguration it is possible to attain the
same degree of concentration but with different product quality.
At least, for multi-effect evaporation in food processing, the referred approach is not necessarily the right micro-economic tool
to nd the optimum number of effects. For this kind of application,
a correct micro-economic analysis should consider not only all
costs but also the expected benets. According to the relevant technical literature, an adequate micro-economic procedure is to maximize the NPV.
In the case of the evaporation process for tomato paste, the production is highly seasonal, and, in addition, the product quality
could be highly affected by the operating conditions. Therefore, it
is important to consider the impact of the installed capacity and
the nal product quality. In the following, we will compare two different economic approaches: (a) determination of the optimal
number of effects by minimizing the total cost and, (b) maximization of the NPV, considering quality as an intrinsic parameter of the
modeled system.
490
as mentioned before, this carotenoid pigment is what gives tomatoes their characteristic color, and, in addition, it has some medical
benets.
Usually, degradation rates in sensitive food components are
modeled as a rst order kinetic, as follows:
r kY or
dY
kY
dt
E
k k0 exp
RT
The rst order kinetic for lycopene degradation has been conrmed by Goula and Adamopoulos (2006). In the same research
study an equation was obtained to determine the reaction rate in
the lycopene degradation, as a function of temperature and soluble
solids concentration X expressed in Brix.
system that must be solved (see Fig. 1 for a schematic representation of the system), operates on countercurrent and the total number of effects varies from 1 to n. The value of n and the
operating conditions will be determined at the end of this work
through the maximization of the NPV.
The total mass balance in evaporator effect i is:
dMi
F i1 Fvi F i
dt
If the mass within the evaporator effect is controlled, then, under steady state, Eq. (5) can be written as:
0 F i1 Fvi F i
In the same way, a mass balance for soluble solids at effect i, can
be written as:
dMi X i
F i1 X i1 F i X i
dt
0 F i1 X i1 F i X i
3
dHi Mi
F i1 Hi1 Fvi1 Hvi1 F i Hi Fvi Hvi Fci Hci Q p
dt
9
4
In our research study, the system to be modeled should consider tomato concentration in the range of 535 Brix, so only Eq.
(4) will be required.
2.3. Model development
The evaporation process involves mass and heat transfer (Himmelblau and Bischoff, 1968). The tomato juice was considered as a
binary solution of water and soluble solids, both considered inert
in a chemical sense. Under these considerations, one effect of the
industrial evaporator can be shown in the manuscript by Miranda
and Simpson, 2005.
So the macroscopic model is of the knowledge-type based on
conservation laws and also empirical relationships which describe
the equilibrium phases. These relationships have been rearranged
from non-linear algebraic equations from literature, with the experience taken from the experimental site. Only the juice phase is
considered for modeling.
The modeling assumptions are:
Homogenous composition and temperature inside each
evaporator.
Constant juice level in each evaporator.
Thermodynamic equilibrium (liquidvapor) for the whole modeled system.
The mathematical model developed in this research study included specic relationships for lycopene degradation. The general
Hi 4:184 2:9337 X i T i
11
The following thermodynamic relationship describes the boiling point rise (BPR) or boiling point elevation (BPE), whose parameters have been determined experimentally, it is one of the three
important properties (specic heat, viscosity and boiling point
rise), that must be specied in a multiple effects evaporator (Rizvi
and Mittal, 1992). This property (BPR) is signicant at high soluble
solids concentration. On a multiple effect equipment, the effective
temperature differences decrease for the combination of boiling
point. The following correlation reported by Miranda and Simpson,
2005, was utilized.
12
Vapor was considered saturated within the evaporator. The following correlations were obtained from Perry and Chilton (1973),
and allow for the estimation of vapor properties with an error of
less than 1%.
For 40 C < Tv < 70 C.
13
491
Tvi 39:0514
P0:2382
i
17:7778
14
15
16
To estimate lycopene degradation (or retention) in each evaporator effects, a mass balance at effect i was carried out as follows:
F i1 X i1 Y i1 F i X i Y i M i
dX i Y i
dM i X i Y i
dt
dt
17
F i1 X i1 Y i1 F i X i Y i M i X i ki Y i 0
18
bj Q j P u C u
Clearly, in food products, unit-price is not constant and it is directly related to the nal quality. As aforementioned, product quality is related to the number of effects (NE), in general with process
arrangement (PA) and operating conditions (OC). In addition, the
incidence of energy in unit-cost can be expressed as a function of
the number of effects (NE) and operating conditions (OC) too.
Therefore Eq. (21) can be expressed as a function of the numbers
of effects and operating conditions, as follows:
NPV IN E
Yi
F i1 X i1 Y i1
F i X i M i X i ki
19
F i1 X i1 Y i1
2207
F i X i Mi X i 0:275271 exp0:00241 X i exp T 273:15
20
With the previous equation (Eq. (20)), lycopene concentration for
the output owrate in each evaporator effect can be estimated
knowing the steady state values, the mass inside each evaporator
effect and the lycopene concentration in the input owrate of each
evaporator effect. It is important to mention that when trying to
estimate lycopene concentration, a degree of freedom is added to
the system, which is satised with the data of lycopene concentration in the evaporator system input (feeding) owrate.
1 ij
!
n
X
Q j Pu N E C u N E
dNPV
dINE
d
dN E
dNE
dNE j1
1 ij
bj
j1
1 ij
24
Considering:
b1 b2 bn b Q Pu NE C u NE
25
bj
1 i
n
X
Q Pu NE CNE
j1
1 ij
K 0 Pu NE C u NE
26
n
X
23
j1
NPV I
n
X
Q j Pu NE ; OC C u N E ; OC
j1
Yi
22
21
dNPV
dIN E
dPu N E C u NE
K0
dN E
dNE
dNE
27
dNPV
dIN E
dPu N E
dC u NE
K0
K0
dN E
dNE
dNE
dNE
28
dNPV
dIN E
dC u NE
K0
dN E
dNE
dNE
29
492
the restriction was equal areas for each evaporator effect. The input
values to the model, shown in Table 1, were the same for all of the
systems and obtained from an actual industrial plant, complemented with available online information from manufacturers.
3.1. Steady state conditions
From the mass and energy balance equations, liquidvapor
equilibrium equation and specic relations for the tomato paste,
a steady state model for the evaporator system was developed,
considering one up to seven effects. From this information, it is
possible to verify the decrease in vapor owrate necessary for
the operational process and an increase in the total system area,
when augmenting the number of effects (Fig. 2).
To have a more precise view of the product behavior in the
evaporation system, residence time and their respective temperatures, are presented in Table 2 for each one of the effects in the different systems.
3.2. Lycopene retention
Lycopene retention in the nal product was estimated for each
one of the alternative systems from the data obtained under steady
state operation. From the results shown in Fig. 3, it is clear that
lycopene concentration in the nal product has a linear decay
when augmenting the number of effects in the evaporation system.
The previous result gives a clue of how the content of lycopene in
Table 1
Input data for mathematical model implementation
Name
Variable
Value
Input owrate
Input temperature
Initial soluble solids
concentration
Input concentration
of lycopene
Final soluble solids
concentration
Steam inlet pressure
Temperature change
in condensator
Operation pressure in
evaporator n
FAl, kg/h
TAl, C
XAl, kg ss/kg
50,000
98
0.05
YAl, kg Lic/kg SS
0.01
X1, kg ss/kg
0.3
Pv0, kPa
Tvn Td, C
143.4
2
Pn, kPa
16.5
Fig. 2. Total transfer area m2 and steam inlet owrate ton/h vs. number of effects.
493
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Residence
time
Temp.
Residence
time
Temp.
Residence
time
Temp.
Residence
time
Temp.
Residence
time
Temp.
Residence
time
1.10
55.9
0.23
0.84
55.6
76.8
0.17
0.28
0.78
55.6
67.5
84.7
0.15
0.20
0.31
0.75
55.6
63.8
74.3
89.3
0.14
0.17
0.22
0.34
0.73
55.6
61.8
69.3
78.9
92.3
0.13
0.15
0.19
0.24
0.36
0.71
55.6
60.5
66.3
73.3
82.3
94.4
0.13
0.14
0.17
0.20
0.26
0.38
0.70
1 effect
Temp.
Residence
time
2 effects
3 effects
4 effects
5 effects
6 effects
40.18
16.5
56.4
27.7
16.5
67.7
36.5
23.8
16.5
76.05
44.76
29.75
21.82
16.5
82.41
51.6
34.91
26.38
20.65
16.5
Temp.
55.6
59.6
64.3
69.8
76.4
84.8
96.1
7 effects
87.5
57.31
40.15
30.32
24.28
19.86
16.5
494
Fig. 5. Changes in energy consumption represented by the vapor owrate kg/h and steam inlet pressure kPa as a function of the input owrate ton/h.
Fig. 6. Residence time (min) and temperature C as a function of the input owrate ton/h.
495
Fig. 8. Cost evaluation for an evaporator system with an input owrate of 50 ton/h.
be restricted by available vapor pressure, minimum specic holdup, pumps power among others.
3.4. Economic evaluation
The economic evaluation consists of determining the optimum
number of effects and operating conditions of the system. The economic evaluation of the system was done in two different ways.
Firstly, an economic evaluation with the concept of minimizing
the total costs, and secondly, an economic evaluation to maximize
the NPV taking into account the impact of the process design and
operating conditions on product quality.
3.5. Optimum number of effects
The economic evaluation was carried out by simple inspection.
This is where the steady state conditions for systems with 17 effects were found, and then total cost minimization and NPV maximization methodologies were used. The search was focused to
nd the number of effects that minimize the total cost and, in addition, to nd the number of effects that maximize the NPV.
The results for each evaluation systems are shown in Figs. 8
and 9. The total cost minimization (Fig. 8) shows an optimum of
Fig. 9. Net Present Value evaluation for evaporator systems with input ow of 50 ton/h.
496
Fig. 10. Optimum number of effects for different input ow rates ton/h according to total cost minimization and Net Present Value maximization.
Table 3
Optimum operating conditions
1st effect
2nd effect
3rd effect
209.6
4494.5
209.2
6767.2
209.1
8475.4
32803.8
0.53
5320
0.639
34.8
30941.1
0.07
4907
0.224
21.9
28727.7
0.03
4815
0.141
16.2
15012.9
260
129.1
2725.45
8322.5
94.26
0.300
0.0096790
96.79%
311.3
21930.0
71.88
0.114
0.0099130
99.13%
276.7
34265.4
55.60
0.073
0.0099724
99.72%
220.7
Vapor
Vapor
Vapor
Vapor
owrate, kg/h
pressure, kPa
temperature, C
enthalpy, kJ/kg
13607.5
81.84
93.73
2666.3
12335.4
32.9
71.81
2629.6
15734.6
16.5
55.57
2602.4
15012.9
129.08
540.4
13607.46
93.7
392.4
12335.4
71.81
300.7
4. Conclusions
Table 4
Optimum number of effects for different steam inlet pressures
Pv0, kPa
110
120
130
140
150
160
170
200
230
260
Maximum NPV
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
5
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
497