Professional Documents
Culture Documents
March 2010
Mailing Address:
Peyton V. Lyon
43 Aylmer Ave
Ottawa, ON K1S 5R4
Canada’s Israel Lobby
Canada's relations with the Arab/Muslim world are second in importance
and difficulty only to its relationship with the United States. The one serious
threat to Canadian citizens now stems from the mounting anger of Arabs
and other Muslims, fomented largely by Israel's long-standing occupation
of Palestine. The Mid-East conflict has for sixty years been the principal
issue on the agenda of the UN General Assembly, a body in which
Canadians like to shine. Trade with the Middle East, while modest, is
largely in manufactured goods, the sort favoured by Canadian exporters.
Canada's foreign policy, however, fails to reflect these concerns. Its votes
in the UN General Assembly and other international bodies are closer in
support of Israel than those of any other nation apart from the United
States and its five Pacific satellites. Prime Minister Harper's personal
statements are more biased towards Israel than those of any other leader.
(1) This imbalance does not accord with the advice of the men and women
The war, however, and the revelation of the slaughter of six million Jews,
transformed the situation. Sympathy for the Jews became nearly universal.
Any criticism of the newly-created state of Israel came to be branded "anti-
Semitic", one of the ugliest terms in our political vocabulary. Canada's
prominent role in the creation of Israel was accepted with little room for
protest (10)
The Israel Lobby took formal shape in 1967 when the three major
Canadian Jewish organizations, the Canadian Jewish Congress, the
Canadian Zionist Organization and B'nai Brith, established the Canada-
Israel Committee (CIC) to act on behalf of Israel. This is an umbrella
organization with no individual members. It was intended to monopolize
public statements on Canada-Israel matters but officials of B'nai Brith,
notably Frank Dimant, frequently disregard this rule. CIC policy is
determined by a 35-person council representing the founding organizations
and several smaller bodies based in the large cities. It meets about once a
year, its executive much more often.
The CIC reported in 2000 that it had a seven-person office in Ottawa to
deal with the federal government and another seven persons in Toronto to
conduct media relations and research; one person was stationed in
Montreal to handle regional lobbying; and a further two in Jerusalem. The
CIC did not reveal its budget but it was estimated to be at least
$11,000,000. The Lobby certainly commands far greater wealth than
opposing entities, and far easier access through its extensive business
connections to members of the cabinet and other senior decision-makers.
Representatives of Arab/Muslim groups are rarely able to secure senior-
level appointments in government while these are more attainable for the
Lobby. Changes in Canada's Middle East policy go to Cabinet, while other
foreign policy changes do not necessarily need to meet this requirement,
one that clearly favours the Lobby.
The Lobby adopted a more effective if heavy-handed approach in 2002
when a group of exceptionally wealthy Canadian Jews reached the
conclusion that the CIC was failing to give Israel adequate support. Led by
Israel (Izzy) Asper, Gerald Schwartz, Heather Reisman, and Brent
Belzberg, the group established the Canadian Council for Israel and
Jewish Advocacy (CIJA). This council raises substantially greater funds
than other Jewish lobby groups and employs professional lobbyists.
Although professing to collaborate with the CIC, B'nai Brith and the
Canadian Jewish Congress, the new body was not welcomed by them.
One senior CIC official complained that the CIJA is "a group of self-
appointed persons who have very little linkage with the Jewish (grass
roots), and who have their own private agendas." (11) When the councils
differ over policy, it is the CIJA -- the one with the “big bucks”-- that
generally prevails.
In its first year, the CIJA sponsored several conferences and more than
doubled the number of sponsored "study" visits to Israel. They included,
among others, 23 federal politicians with spouses and seven university
presidents. The CIJA claimed to have won the ear of those who make
decisions, and thus gets credit for a sharp shift towards Israel in Canada's
international posture.
The Lobby's tactics are not unlike those of other lobbies. It supports
Canadians who support Israel and criticizes those who don't. It caters to
decision-makers who seem open to persuasion. It addresses articles and
letters to the media. It supplies information to journalists, provides
speakers, and sponsors seminars and conferences as well as subsidizing
tours of Israel. The Lobby's primary attention, of course, is paid to the
officials and politicians who make or influence the decisions of interest to
Israel. They are entertained and briefed frequently. As one deputy minister
put it, they are "all over us, from minister to desk officer." The Arab-
Canadians, he explained, do much the same, but the Lobby "does it
better".(12) He could have added that Jewish-Canadians have easier access
to high places. The Lobby does not employ explicit threats but knows that
MPs and others can count, and the fate of Frank Epp has intimidated many
others. Libby Davies, the NDP member for Vancouver-East, says MP’s live
in what she calls “a climate of fear” on issues dealing with Israel-Palestine.
(13)
The Lobby also seeks to shape the future by extensive activity in the
universities. Officials are placed in all the major institutions to foster Hillel
clubs that promote communal sentiment among Jews and beyond by
means of talks and debates. A separate body,"StandWithUs", provides
students with financial assistance to gain training in how to fight what the
Lobby considers "anti-Israel" actions. Its activity has contributed to serious
strife and extensive publicity in two universities. In 2002, at Concordia, the
administration blocked Arab and Muslim students from attending a planned
speech by Benjamin Netanyahu, the right-wing Israeli leader. This
resulted in anger over perceived discrimination that led to a riot of 2,000
protesters. The speech was subsequently cancelled. At York university, in
February 2009, the administration itself fostered turbulence by excessive
measures to halt peaceful pro-Palestinian demonstrations.(14) In other
universities, notably Toronto, McMaster, Ottawa, and Carleton, the Lobby
has backed the administrations in their attempts to ban pro-Palestine
activities such as the annual Israeli Apartheid Week.
9
_________
Notes
1. It does not appear that any other leader, apart from Israel's, described
as "measured" Israel's 2006 invasion of Lebanon in which over a thousand
civilians were killed. Harper's branding of all criticism of Israel as "anti-
Semitic" appears to be unique.
2. "Ranking of DEA Officials of Weight of Inputs (influence) in the
Making of Canadian Foreign Policy” (scale of 1 to 7) from a study by John
Kirton and Peyton Lyon in the Journal of Canadian Studies, winter, 1992-3.
Group Influence Ranking
DEA 5.04
Israel 4.92
Cabinet 4.68
Media 4.24
Business 2.92
PLO 1.52
Provinces 1.20
26. For an indication how the Aspers treat independent minded editors
see Marc Edge, “Asper Nation: Canada’s most dangerous media
company.” New Star Books. Vancouver, 152-169.
27. Leonard Asper, “Media Bias and the Middle East.” National Post,
October 1, 2003
28. Robert Fisk, “Journalists are under fire for telling the truth.” The
Independent, December 18, 2002
29. Ian Austen, “Reuters Asks a Chain to Remove Its Bylines,” New
York Times, September 20, 2004
30. Annual Report, 2006. The Near East Cultural and Educational
Foundation of Canada.
31. “Arabist" is properly a scholar of the Arab language or civilization but
has become a term for Arab sympathizer. Students in the first sense do
tend to become Arabists in the second sense. "Lobbyists" often claim that
diplomats who serve in a Mid-East post become Arab sympathizers and
unreliable guides to Canadian policy. There is some slight truth in this, but
a study revealed that officers who served in Israel become the most critical
of Israel.”
32. " Irving Abella and Harold Troper, “None is too many,” Key Porter
Books, Toronto 2000
33. Pearson in his seminar in the School of International Affairs,
Carleton University.
35. Trudeau's constituency contained the largest number of Jewish
Canadians in Canada and he deemed it unwise to criticize Israel in public.
He engaged, however, in an angry exchange with Prime Minister Begin of
Israel over its 1992 invasion of Lebanon, and was outspokenly critical in
conversation with friends
36. Pierre Trudeau, “Memoirs,” McClelland and Stewart, Toronto 1993.
pp 215-216
37. Claude Henault, ““Zionists Block Peace, Trudeau Says”, the Toronto
Star, October 24 ,1979. Page A6
38. Robert Stanfield, Address to the Canadian-Arab Relations
Conference, Calgary 1981
39. John Dirlik, “Mulroney Resignation Saddens Mainstream Jewish
Leaders,” Washington Report on Middle East Affairs, April/May 1993, p.38
40. Richard Falk, quoted in Laura Payton, “Tory's Israel Policy
Damaging: UN Rapporteur” Embassy Magazine, September 30, 2009.