You are on page 1of 2

Federal Register / Vol. 70, No.

124 / Wednesday, June 29, 2005 / Notices 37455

that matches fees to costs and pays Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
rebates to its members. Furthermore, proposed rule change as described in Statement of the Purpose of, and
Cantor and RCG were the only parties to items I, II, and III below, which items Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
submit negative comments on the have been prepared by the Exchange. Change
proposed rule change. The Commission On June 15, 2005, the Exchange filed
did not receive comments from any 1. Purpose
Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule
FICC members or potential FICC change.3 ISE has designated this The Exchange proposes to amend its
members, other than from Cantor and proposal as one establishing or changing Schedule of Fees to adopt a $.10 per
RCG, stating that the proposed rule a due, fee, or other charge imposed by contract surcharge fee for certain
change would make it too expensive for transactions in options on SPDRs.6
a self-regulatory organization pursuant
them to remain or to become a member The Exchange’s Schedule of Fees
to section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act,4 and
of FICC. Accordingly, for the reasons currently has in place a surcharge fee
discussed above, the Commission finds Rule 19b–4(f)(2) thereunder,5 which
renders the proposal effective upon item that calls for a $.10 per contract fee
that the proposed rule change is for transactions in certain licensed
consistent with section 17A(b)(3)(I) of filing with the Commission. The
products. The Exchange entered into a
the Act in that it does not impose a Commission is publishing this notice to
license agreement with Standard and
burden on competition not necessary or solicit comments on the proposed rule
Poor’s, a unit of McGraw-Hill
appropriate in furtherance of the change, as amended, from interested Companies, Inc., authorizing the
purposes of the Act. persons. Exchange to list SPDR options. The
VI. Conclusion I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Exchange is adopting this fee for
Statement of the Terms of Substance of transactions in SPDR options to defray
On the basis of the foregoing, the the licensing costs. The Exchange
Commission finds that the proposed the Proposed Rule Change
believes that charging the participants
rule change is consistent with the The ISE proposes to amend its that trade these instruments is the most
requirements of the Act and in equitable means of recovering the costs
Schedule of Fees to adopt a $.10 per
particular with the requirements of of the license. However, because
contract surcharge for certain
Section 17A of the Act and the rules and competitive pressures in the industry
transactions in options based on the
regulations thereunder applicable. have resulted in the waiver of
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Standard & Poor’s Depository
Receipts, or SPDRs (‘‘SPDRs’’). The transaction fees for Public Customers,7
section 19(b)(2) of the Act, that the
text of the proposed rule change is the Exchange proposes to exclude
proposed rule change (File No. SR–
available on the Exchange’s Internet Public Customer Orders 8 from this
FICC–2004–15) be and hereby is
approved. Web site (http://www.iseoptions.com), at surcharge fee. Accordingly, this
the Exchange’s Office of the Secretary, surcharge fee will only be charged to
For the Commission by the Division of Exchange members with respect to non-
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated and at the Commission’s Public
Reference Room. Public Customer Orders (e.g., Market
authority.16
Maker and Firm Proprietary orders) and
J. Lynn Taylor, shall apply to Linkage Orders under a
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Assistant Secretary. Statement of the Purpose of, and pilot program that is set to expire on
[FR Doc. E5–3381 Filed 6–28–05; 8:45 am] Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule July 31, 2005.9
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P Change Additionally, if it is concluded by the
courts, after all avenues of appeal, that
In its filing with the Commission, the no license from Standard and Poor’s
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE Exchange included statements was required by the Exchange to list
COMMISSION concerning the purpose of, and basis for, SPDR options, then upon any refund by
[Release No. 34–51901; File No. SR–ISE– the proposed rule change and discussed Standard and Poor’s, the Exchange shall
2005–06] any comments it received on the submit a rule filing to the Commission
proposed rule change. The text of these providing for a reimbursement of the
Self-Regulatory Organizations; statements may be examined at the surcharge fees paid by members to the
International Securities Exchange, Inc.; places specified in item IV below. The Exchange as a result of this surcharge
Notice of Filing and Immediate Exchange has prepared summaries, set fee.
Effectiveness of Proposed Rule forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
Change and Amendment No. 1 Thereto 2. Statutory Basis
the most significant aspects of such
Relating to Fee Changes for The Exchange believes that the
statements.
Transactions in Options on the proposed rule change is consistent with
Standard & Poor’s Depository section 6(b) of the Act 10 in general, and
3 In Amendment No. 1, the Exchange made non-
Receipts furthers the objectives of section 6(b)(4)
substantive changes to clarify the purpose for the
June 22, 2005. fee change. The effective date of the original
6 The Exchange represents that these fees will be
Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the proposed rule change is May 20, 2005, and the
effective date of Amendment No. 1 is June 15, 2005. charged only to Exchange members.
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 7 Public Customer is defined in ISE Rule
For purposes of calculating the 60-day period
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 100(a)(32) as a person that is not a broker or dealer
within which the Commission may summarily
notice is hereby given that on May 20, abrogate the proposed rule change, as amended, in securities.
2005, the International Securities under Section 19(b)(3)(C) of the Act, the
8 Public Customer Order is defined in ISE Rule

Exchange, Inc. (‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘ISE’’) 100(a)(33) as an order for the account of a Public
Commission considers the period to commence on
Customer.
filed with the Securities and Exchange June 15, 2005, the date on which the Exchange 9 See ISE Rule 1900(10) (defining Linkage
submitted Amendment No. 1. See 15 U.S.C. Orders). The surcharge fee will apply to the
16 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). 78s(b)(3)(C). following Linkage Orders: Principal Acting as Agent
1 15 4 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). Orders and Principal Orders.
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. 5 5 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2). 10 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).

VerDate jul<14>2003 17:40 Jun 28, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00135 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\29JNN1.SGM 29JNN1
37456 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 124 / Wednesday, June 29, 2005 / Notices

of the Act 11 in particular, in that it Paper Comments (‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder, 2
provides for the equitable allocation of • Send paper comments in triplicate notice is hereby given that on January
reasonable dues, fees and other charges to Jonathan G. Katz, Secretary, 18, 2005, the National Association of
among its members and other persons Securities and Exchange Commission, Securities Dealers, Inc. (‘‘NASD’’),
using its facilities. Station Place, 100 F Street, NE., through its subsidiary, the Nasdaq Stock
Washington, DC 20549–9303. Market, Inc. (‘‘Nasdaq’’), filed with the
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Securities and Exchange Commission
Statement on Burden on Competition All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–ISE–2005–06. This file (‘‘Commission’’ or ‘‘SEC’’) the proposed
The Exchange does not believe that number should be included on the rule change as described in Items I, II,
the proposed rule change will impose subject line if e-mail is used. To help the and III below, which Items have been
any burden on competition that is not Commission process and review your prepared by Nasdaq. Nasdaq submitted
necessary or appropriate in furtherance comments more efficiently, please use Amendment No. 1 to its proposed rule
of the purposes of the Act. only one method. The Commission will change on February 4, 2005 3 and
post all comments on the Commissions submitted Amendment No. 2 to its
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s proposed rule change on June 6, 2005 4.
Statement on Comments on the Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the The Commission is publishing this
Proposed Rule Change Received From notice to solicit comments on the
Members, Participants or Others submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements proposed rule change, as amended, from
The Exchange has not solicited, and with respect to the proposed rule interested persons.
does not intend to solicit, comments on change that are filed with the I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
this proposed rule change. The Commission, and all written Statement of the Terms of the Substance
Exchange has not received any communications relating to the of the Proposed Rule Change
unsolicited written comments from proposed rule change between the Nasdaq proposes to require that
members or other interested parties with Commission and any person, other than foreign private issuers listed on Nasdaq
respect to this proposed rule change. those that may be withheld from the provide semi-annual financial
III. Date of Effectiveness of the public in accordance with the information. Nasdaq will implement the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be proposed rule change for interim
Commission Action available for inspection and copying in periods ending after January 1, 2006.
the Commission’s Public Reference The text of the proposed rule change
The foregoing proposed rule change Room. Copies of the filing also will be is below. Proposed additions are
has been designated as a fee change available for inspection and copying at italicized.5
pursuant to section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the the principal office of the ISE. All
Act 12 and Rule 19b–4(f)(2) 13 comments received will be posted 4350. Qualitative Listing Requirements
thereunder. Accordingly, the proposed without change; the Commission does for Nasdaq National Market and
rule change is effective upon filing with not edit personal identifying Nasdaq SmallCap Market Issuers
the Commission. At any time within 60 information from submissions. You Except for Limited Partnerships
days of the filing of the amended should submit only information that Nasdaq shall review the issuer’s past
proposed rule change, the Commission you wish to make available publicly. All corporate governance activities. This
may summarily abrogate such rule submissions should refer to File review may include activities taking
change if it appears to the Commission Number SR–ISE–2005–06 and should be place while the issuer is listed on
that such action is necessary or submitted on or before July 20, 2005. Nasdaq or an exchange that imposes
appropriate in the public interest, for For the Commission, by the Division of corporate governance requirements, as
the protection of investors, or otherwise Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated well as activities taking place after a
in furtherance of the purposes of the authority.15 formerly listed issuer is no longer listed
Act.14 J. Lynn Taylor, on Nasdaq or an exchange that imposes
Assistant Secretary. corporate governance requirements.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Based on such review, Nasdaq may take
[FR Doc. E5–3384 Filed 6–28–05; 8:45 am]
Interested persons are invited to any appropriate action, including
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
submit written data, views, and placing of restrictions on or additional
arguments concerning the foregoing, requirements for listing, or the denial of
including whether the proposed rule SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE listing of a security if Nasdaq
change, as amended, is consistent with COMMISSION determines that there have been
the Act. Comments may be submitted by violations or evasions of such corporate
any of the following methods: [Release No. 34–51905; File No. SR–NASD–
2005–006] 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
Electronic Comments 2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
Self-Regulatory Organizations; 3 Amendment No. 1 modified the proposed rule
• Use the Commission’s Internet National Association of Securities language to require that interim financial
comment form (http://www.sec.gov/ Dealers, Inc.; Notice of Filing of information be published on a press release that
rules/sro.shtml); or Proposed Rule Change and would also be submitted on a Form 6-K. As
originally proposed, the rule language required that
• Send an e-mail to rule- Amendments Nos. 1 and 2 Thereto to interim financial information be submitted on a
comments@sec.gov. Please include File Require Semi-Annual Financial press release or on a Form 6–K.
No. SR–ISE–2005–06 on the subject Reporting by Foreign Private Issuers 4 Amendment No. 2 made technical corrections to

line. the filing and replaced and superceded the original


June 22, 2005. filing and Amendment No. 1 in its entirety.
5 The proposed rule change is marked to show
11 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4). Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the
changes to the rule text appearing in the electronic
12 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii). Securities Exchange Act of 1934 NASD Manual available at http://www.nasd.com.
13 17 CFR 19b–4(f)(2).
No pending rule filings would affect the text of this
14 See supra note 3. 15 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). rule.

VerDate jul<14>2003 17:40 Jun 28, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00136 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\29JNN1.SGM 29JNN1

You might also like