Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Department of Electrical Engineering, Piraeus University of Applied Sciences, 250, Thivon & P. Ralli Ave.,
12244, Egaleo, Greece
*Corresponding author: E-mail: cpsomop@teipir.gr , Tel: +30 210 5381182
Abstract
Regarding Small Scale Energy Storage Systems, we will have to exclude the large Pumped Hydro
because of its bulk capacity characteristic. Flywheels, Super Magnetic Energy Storage and
Supercapacitors are considered environmentally friendly and briefly mentioned; therefore we will
focus on electrochemical means of EES systems such as batteries.
Batteries are identified as a problematic material in the waste stream. They are made from a variety
of chemicals and some of these chemicals, such as nickel and cadmium, are extremely toxic and can
cause damage to humans and environment. They can also cause soil and water pollution and
endanger wildlife. Cadmium can cause damage to soil micro-organisms and affect the breakdown
of organic matter. Other chemicals used in modern electrochemical batteries will be discussed,
along with any protective means of safe utilization with minimum environmental impact.
Keywords: Energy Storage; batteries; cadmium; lithium; environment.
1. INTRODUCTION
Electrical Energy Storage (EES) refers to a process where electrical energy from a power network is
stored and then converted back to electrical energy when needed. Such a process enables electricity
to be stored at times of low demand, low generation cost or from stochastic energy sources such as
wind, solar and wave and be used at times of high demand, high generation cost or when no other
generation method is available. [1]
1.1 Energy Storage Methods
The current energy storage systems [2] are divided in the following categories according to the
means of energy storage:
Electrochemical energy
o Battery Energy Storage (BES)
Lead-Acid
Nickel battery
Sodium-sulfur
Lithium battery
Metal-air battery
o Flow Battery Energy Storage (FBES)
o Superconducting Magnetic Energy Storage (SMES)
o Super Capacitor Energy Storage (SCES)
Mechanical Energy
o Compressed Air Energy Storage (CAES)
o Liquid Air Energy Storage (LAES) or Cryogenic Energy Storage (CES)
o Hydro Energy Storage (HES)
o Pumped Hydro Energy Storage (PHES)
o Flywheel Energy Storage (FES)
Chemical Energy Storage
o Hydrogen
Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Environmental Management,
Engineering, Planning & Economics
ISBN: 978-960-6865-87-9, Mykonos island, Greece , June 14-18, 2015
399
technologies [6].
Environmental Impacts & Regulatory Issues: The lead used in these batteries is toxic [7] and
therefore must be recycled. In addition, the sulphuric acid typically used as the electrolyte is
corrosive and when overcharged the battery generates hydrogen which presents an explosion risk.
2.1.1.2 Nickel Batteries
Technical summary: Nickel batteries are electrochemical cells. There are a number of Nickel based
batteries currently available or under development, including Nickel-Cadmium (Ni-Cd), NickelMetal Hydride (Ni-MH), Nickel-Zinc (Ni-Zn) and Sodium-Nickel Chloride (Na-NiCl2). Ni-Cd and
Ni-MH are the most developed of the Ni batteries [6].
Environmental Impacts & Regulatory Issues: The most significant drawback of Ni-Cd batteries is
the highly toxic cadmium used within them. Although this metal is highly recyclable it is
exceedingly toxic. Most Nickel is recovered from end-of-life batteries since the metal is reasonably
easy to retrieve from scrap and can be used in corrosion resistant alloys such as stainless steel. EU
legislation is in part responsible for the supercedence of NiCd batteries by Ni-MH batteries and
represents a significant issue to any future development of Ni-Cd battery technologies. Avoiding
fumes and dust is essential for workers in this sector [8].
2.1.1.3 Sodium-Sulfur Batteries
Technical summary: Sodium-Sulphur (NaS) batteries are electrochemical cells. NaS batteries are
the most developed type of high temperature battery. A NaS battery consists of liquid (molten)
sulphur at the positive electrode and liquid (molten) sodium at the negative electrode as active
materials separated by a solid beta alumina ceramic electrolyte [9]. The electrolyte allows only the
positive sodium ions to pass through it and combine with the sulphur to form sodium polysulphides.
Environmental Impacts & Regulatory Issues: There are limited environmental concerns associated
with NaS batteries, since the materials used in their construction are relatively environmentally
inert. There is a small risk associated with the high temperature at which the battery must be
operated in order to maintain the sulphur in its molten form [10].
2.1.1.4 Lithium Batteries
Technical summary: Lithium batteries are electrochemical cells. Lithium-Ion (Li-ion) and LithiumPolymer (Li-pol) types are both available [11].
Environmental Impacts & Regulatory Issues: Li batteries have a limited environmental impact since
the lithium oxides and salts can be recycled. The main impact is the resource depletion, human
toxicity and Eco toxicity mainly associated with copper, cobalt, nickel, thallium and silver) [12].
2.1.1.5 Metal-Air Batteries
Technical summary: Metal-air batteries are electrochemical cells and are the most compact batteries
available.
Environmental Impacts & Regulatory Issues: Environmentally, metal-air batteries are relatively
inert since no toxic materials are involved in their construction. Like other battery types, metals
such as zinc or aluminium used within the battery should be recycled [6].
2.1.2 Flow Batteries
Technical summary: Flow batteries store and release energy through a reversible electrochemical
reaction between two electrolytes. There are four types of flow battery currently being produced or
in the late stages of development; zinc bromine, vanadium redox (VRB), polysulphide bromide and
cerium zinc. The zinc-bromine system - developed by ZBB Energy Corp in the USA - represents a
type of hybrid flow battery. A leading form of the vanadium redox flow battery is a system by VRB
Power Systems Inc in Canada. These systems feature the separation of chemical reactants from the
electrochemical cells through which charging and discharging take place. The storage capacity is
401
dependent upon the size of the electrolyte tanks whilst the power output is dependent upon the size
of the fuel cell. The vanadium redox system has an advantage over the hybrid system as the
discharge time at full power can be varied [13].
Environmental Impacts & Regulatory Issues: The potential size and scale of these systems are
likely to determine the extent to which environmental impacts are significant. Significant quantities
of space may be required for holding tanks containing the electrolytes and although these
substances may not be specifically toxic this obviously requires care at the design stage. A major
advantage of the technology is the ability of the technology to perform discharge cycles indefinitely
so there are no significant waste products associated with operation [14].
2.1.3 Superconducting Magnetic Energy Storage
Technical summary: SMES is a technology that can store electrical energy in a magnetic field
within a cooled super-conducting coil. The coil is cryogenically cooled beyond its super-conducting
temperature (-269oC). At this temperature, resistance of the material to electric currents disappears,
and the limited electrical resistance allows extremely high efficiencies of up to 97% to be achieved
as well as enabling storage more or less indefinitely. An additional advantage is the immediate
release of power which renders the system useful to customers requiring extremely high quality
power output [15].
Environmental Impacts & Regulatory Issues: Extremely low temperatures are required for the
superconducting system which represents a safety issue. Larger scale SMES systems could require
significant protection to deal with magnetic radiation issues in the immediate vicinity of the plant
[16].
2.1.4 Supercapacitors Energy Storage
Technical summary: Supercapacitors can store energy in the electric field between a pair of charged
plates. Supercapacitors, ultracapacitors or double-layer capacitors (DLCs) as they are also known,
contain a significantly enlarged electrode surface area compared to conventional capacitors, as well
as a liquid electrolyte and a polymer membrane [17].
Environmental Impacts & Regulatory Issues: Supercapacitors can be employed to enhance the
energy performance of automotives, for example, through regenerative braking systems, which can
therefore lead to emissions benefits. In addition, supercapacitors have a long lifecycle. Potential
negative environmental impacts of supercapacitors arise from the materials and compounds used
within their construction and operation [1], [18].
2.2 Mechanical Energy Storage Systems
2.2.1 Flywheel
Technical Summary: Flywheels represent a mechanical form of energy storage in which the kinetic
energy of a fast-spinning cylinder contains considerable stored energy. Recent technological
advances have modernised the traditional flywheel, improving its efficiency dramatically. Modern
flywheel systems are typically comprised of a massive rotating cylinder, supported on a stator by
magnetically levitated bearings that eliminate wear and extend system life compared with
conventional bearings. To increase efficiency, the flywheel is operated in a low pressure
environment to reduce friction with the air. A flywheel energy storage system draws electricity
from a primary source to spin the high density cylinder at speeds greater than 20,000 rpm [19].
Environmental Impacts and Regulatory Issues: With no chemical management and disposal issues
to consider, flywheels have some environmental advantages over the battery systems described
earlier. Design life for these devices may be only a few years or less, which is an area for future
research activity. Subject to stringent safety safeguards applied to the operation of heavy, rapidly
rotating objects, a flywheel system should not cause problems to the local area [6].
402
small scale heat storage solution with minimum to non-existent environmental impacts. The main
environmental concern regarding the Ice Thermal Energy Storage lies within the refrigerant used in
the freezing cycle [29].
Table 2. Hydrogen Production Pathways and Environmental Considerations
(-) Burning natural gas contributes to global warming
Steam Methane Reforming
(-) Extracting and transporting natural gas could harm sensitive
landscapes
(-) Making H2 from coal or heavy oil would generate large
Gasification of Coal
amounts of carbon emissions
(-) Coal mining can degrade land and water quality
(+) Use of renewable power would produce low to zeroElectrolysis
emissions
(-) Use of conventional grid power would generate more global
warming pollution than steam methane reforming with natural
gas
(-) Near-term benefits of using renewable power may be greater
if used to displace other sources of electricity
(+) If feedstock are sustainably cultivated, process has low to no
Gasification of Biomass
net global warming emissions
(-) Large scale production of feedstock and collection and
transport of crops and residues may raise air, land and ecosystem
concerns
(+) Low global warming emissions
Nuclear Power
(-) Issues of waste management and disposal and extraction and
processing of uranium
3. DISCUSSION
No matter the magnitude of the energy storage system, certain environmental aspects should be
considered. In the context of promoting smart grids as in small scale and distributed energy
generation in remote communities, the major aspects of batteries environmental impacts must be
considered. Consumers must have the means and proper information on recycling of the batteries,
thus a proper recycling network must operate flawlessly. In general, energy storage systems are
environmentally inert during their operation and the major impacts are found during their
construction. As in all chemical and mechanical devices, the installation must be made in secure
rooms with all the necessary precautions, lighting, accident prevention automations and emergency
exits.
The future need for energy storage will increase but also the technologies used, in means of
materials, will shift towards more environmentally friendly materials. Lead-Acid batteries, for
example are the current pinnacle of energy storage in many sectors, and because they can be
recycled up to 90% they are the best choice in means of operation capabilities and environmental
aspects.
References
1. Chen, H., Cong, T., Yang, W., Tan, C., Li, Y., Ding, Y., 2009. Progress in Electrical Energy
Storage System: A Critical Review. Progress in Natural Science, 19, 291-312.
2. Mahlia, T.M.I., Saktisahdan, T.J., Jannifar, A., Hasan, M.H., Matseelar, H.S.C., 2014. A
Review of Available Methods and Development on Energy Storage; Technology Update.
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 33, 532-45
404
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
Etxeberria, A., Vechiu, I., Camblong, H., Vinassa, J.M., 2010. Hybrid Energy Storage Systems
for Renewable Energy Sources Integration in Microgrids: A Review. International Power
Electronics Conference, 2010 Conference Proceedings. 532-37
European Commision, 2001. Energy Sorage: A Key for Decantralised Power, Power Quality
and Clean Transport. European Commission
European Commission, 2013. The Future Role and Challenges of Energy Storage. European
Commission.
Rand, D.A.J., Moseley, P.T., 2015. Electrochemical Energy Storage for Renewable Sources
and Grid Balancing, Netherlands: Elsevier
Repko, J.D., Morgan, B.B., Nicholson, J., 1975. Behavioural Effects of Occupational Exposure
to Lead, USA: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
UK Health and Safety Executive, 2010. Cadmium and you. [Online] Available at:
http://www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/indg391.pdf [Accessed April 7, 2015]
Kaldellis, J.K., Zafirakis, D., Kavadias, K., 2007. Techno-economic Comparison of Energy
Storage Systems for Island Autonomous Electrical Networks. Renewable and Sustainable
Energy Reviews, 13 (2), 378-392
Corbus, D., 1992. Environmental, Health, and Safety Issues of Sodium-Sulfur Batteries for
Electric and Hybrid Vehicles, Technical Report NREL/TP-262-4680, National Renewable
Energy Laboratory
Bini, M., Capsoni, D., Ferrari, S., Quartarone, E., Mustarelli, P., 2015. Recharegeable Lithium
Batteries: Key Scientific and Technological Challenges. Rechargeable Lithium Batteries. From
Fundamentals to Applications. Bayern: Woodhead Publishing
Kang, D.H.P., Chen, M., Ogunseitan, O., 2013. Potential Environmental and Human Health
Impacts of Rechargeable Lithium Batteries in Electronic Waste. Environmental Science &
Technology, 47 (10), 5495-5503
Alotto, P., Guarnieri, M., Moro, F., 2014. Redox Flow Batteries for the Storage of Renewable
Energy: A Review, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 29, 325-335
Weber, Z., Mench, M.M., Meyers, J.P. Ross, P.N., Gostick, J.T., Liu, Q., 2011. Redox Flow
Batteries: A Review, Journal of Applied Electrochemistry, 41, 1137-1164
Buckles, W., Hassenzahl, W.V., 2000. Superconducting Magnetic Energy Storage, Power
Engineering Review, IEEE, 20 (5), 16-20
Blanchard, J.P., 1989. Environmental Issues Associated with Superconducting Magnetic
Energy Storage (SMES) Plants, Proceedings of the 24th Intersociety Energy Conversion
Engineering Conference IECEC-89 (Cat. No. 89CH2781-3), August 6-11, Washington, DC
Volume 4 (A90-38029 16-20), IEEE, 1777-1782
Xingguo, T., Qingmin, L., Hui, W., 2013. Advances and Trends of Energy Storage Technology
in Microgrid, Electrical Power and Energy Systems, 44, 179-191
Lixue, Z., Zhihong, L., Guanglei, C., Liquan, C., 2015. Biomass-Derived Materials for
Electrochemical Energy Storages, Progress in Polymer Science, 43, 136-164
Zafirakis, D.P., 2010. Overview of Energy Storage Technologies for Renewable Energy
Systems, Stand-Alone and Hybrid Wind Energy Systems. Technology, Energy Storage and
Applications, Bayern: Woodhead Publishing
Lund, H., Salgi, G., 2009. The Role of Compressed Air Energy Storage (CAES) in Future
Sustainable Energy Systems, Energy Conversion and Management, 50, 1172-1179
Jubeh, N.M., Najjar, Y.S.H., 2012. Green Solution for Power Generation by Adoption of
Adiabetic CAES System, Applied Thermal Engineering, 44, 85-89
Bouman, E.A., berg, M.M., Hertwich, E.G., 2013. Life Cycle Assessment of Compressed Air
Energy Storage (CAES), 6th International Conference on Life Cycle Management LCM 2013,
August 25-28, Gothenburg, Sweden
http://www.highview-power.com/wp-content/uploads/Highview-Brochure-2014.pdf [Accessed
April 8, 2015]
405
24. Brett, G., Barnett, M., 2013. The Application of Liquid Air Energy Storage for Large Scale
Long Duration Solutions to Grid Balancing, 3rd European Energy Conference E2C 2013,
October 27-30, Budapest, Hungary
25. Herzog, A., Tatsutani, M., 2005. A Hydrogen Future? An Economic and Environmental
Assessment of Hydrogen Production Pathways, Natural Resources Defense Council, New York
26. Correas, L., 2013. HyUnder Project, available online at: http://tinyurl.com/n6f6d2d [Accessed
April 9, 2015]
27. Reuss, M., 2015. The Use of Borehole Thermal Energy Storage (BTES) Systems. Advances in
Thermal Energy Storage Systems, Methods and Applications, Bayern: Woodhead Publishing
28. Gholami, H., Khalilnejad, A., Gharehpetian, G.B., 2015. Electrothermal Performance and
Environmental effects of Optimal Photovoltaic-Thermal System. Energy Conversion and
Management, 95, 326-333
29. Benhadid-Dib, S., Benzaoui, A., 2012. Refrigerants and their Environmental Impact
Substitution of Hydro Chlorofluorocarbon HCFC and HFC Hydro Fluorocarbon. Search for an
Adequate Refrigerant, Energy Procedia, 18, 807-816
406