You are on page 1of 2

Federal Register / Vol. 70, No.

66 / Thursday, April 7, 2005 / Notices 17731

It is therefore ordered, pursuant to proposed rule change and discussed any 2. Statutory Basis
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,9 that the comments it received on the proposed By enhancing HOSS opening
proposed rule change (SR–Amex–2005– rule change. The text of these statements procedures and making an e-DPM’s
007), as amended, be, and it hereby is, may be examined at the places specified HOSS obligations consistent with those
approved. in Item IV below. The CBOE has of a DPM’s, the Exchange believes that
For the Commission, by the Division of prepared summaries, set forth in this proposed rule change is consistent
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated sections A, B, and C below, of the most with Section 6(b) of the Act,8 in general,
authority.10 significant aspects of such statements. and further the objectives of Section
Margaret H. McFarland, 6(b)(5) 9 in particular, in that it should
Deputy Secretary.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
promote just and equitable principles of
Statement of the Purpose of, and
[FR Doc. E5–1580 Filed 4–6–05; 8:45 am] trade, serve to remove impediments to
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P and perfect the mechanism of a free and
Change
open market and a national market
1. Purpose system, and protect investors and the
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE public interest.
COMMISSION The Exchange is proposing to amend
its rules relating to HOSS procedures B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
[Release No. 34–51459; File No. SR–CBOE– Statement on Burden on Competition
2005–27] and the rules relating to e-DPMs to
require all e-DPMs to submit opening This proposed rule change does not
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice quotes during the HOSS opening impose any burden on competition that
of Filing of a Proposed Rule Change by rotation for every series in each Hybrid is not necessary or appropriate in
the Chicago Board Options Exchange, class to which any e-DPM is allocated. furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
Incorporated Relating to the Hybrid Currently, CBOE rules only require C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Opening System DPMs to submit opening quotes in Statement on Comments on the
option classes listed and traded on the Proposed Rule Change Received From
March 31, 2005.
Exchange. The Exchange believes that Members, Participants or Others
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requiring e-DPMs to submit opening
No written comments were solicited
(‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 quotes along with DPMs would enhance
or received with respect to the proposed
notice is hereby given that on March 24, the opening process for Hybrid option
rule change.
2005, the Chicago Board Options classes by providing greater liquidity
Exchange, Incorporated (‘‘CBOE’’ or during opening rotations, which would III. Date of Effectiveness of the
‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities in turn lessen the possibility that a Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
and Exchange Commission Hybrid option class might be unable to Commission Action
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule open. Within 35 days of the date of
change as described in Items I, II, and To illustrate, under current CBOE publication of this notice in the Federal
III below, which Items have been rules, only a DPM is required to submit Register or within such longer period (i)
prepared by the CBOE. The Commission opening quotes in a series 3 and, if the as the Commission may designate up to
is publishing this notice to solicit DPM’s quoted size at the open is below 90 days of such date if it finds such
comments on the proposed rule change the total size of the market orders on the longer period to be appropriate and
from interested persons. other side of the market and no other publishes its reasons for so finding or
quotes are on the open, there is a market (ii) as to which the CBOE consents, the
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Commission will:
Statement of the Terms of Substance of order imbalance and, under CBOE rules,
HOSS will not open that series.4 If all (A) By order approve such proposed
the Proposed Rule Change rule change, or
e-DPMs are now required to add size to
The proposed rule change would (B) Institute proceedings to determine
the opening quote for each series in the
amend the Hybrid Opening System whether the proposed rule change
option classes allocated to e-DPMs, the
(‘‘HOSS’’) procedures and the rule should be disapproved.
incidence of market order imbalances is
relating to the obligations of electronic
likely to decrease. IV. Solicitation of Comments
designated primary market makers (‘‘e-
DPMs’’). The text of the proposed rule As such, HOSS rules 5 and the rules Interested persons are invited to
change is available on the CBOE’s Web relating to e-DPM and DPM obligations, submit written data, views, and
site (http://www.cboe.com), at the respectively,6 will be amended to arguments concerning the foregoing,
CBOE’s Office of the Secretary, and at require both e-DPMs and DPMs to enter including whether the proposed rule
the Commission’s Public Reference opening quotes in accordance with change is consistent with the Act.
Room. HOSS rules in 100% of the series of Comments may be submitted by any of
each class allocated to that DPM or e- the following methods:
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
DPM.7 Electronic Comments
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule 3 SeeRule 6.2B(a).
• Use the Commission’s Internet
Change 4 See comment form (http://www.sec.gov/
Rule 6.2B(e)(iii).
In its filing with the Commission, 5 Rule 6.2B. rules/sro.shtml); or
CBOE included statements concerning 6 DPM obligations are provided under Rule • Send an e-mail to rule-
the purpose of and basis for the 8.85(a) and e-DPM obligations are provided under comments@sec.gov. Please include File
Rule 8.93. Number SR–CBOE–2005–27 on the
7 Under current CBOE rules, DPMs already are
9 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2). required to submit opening quotes in all of its
subject line.
10 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). allocated classes, but this rule filing proposes to
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 8 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
adopt rule language that will apply uniformly to
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. both DPMs and e-DPMs. 9 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).

VerDate jul<14>2003 18:22 Apr 06, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00088 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\07APN1.SGM 07APN1
17732 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 66 / Thursday, April 7, 2005 / Notices

Paper Comments SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE is embodied in an Agreement dated


COMMISSION August 7, 2001, (‘‘2001 Agreement’’)
• Send paper comments in triplicate between CBOE and the CBOT as
to Jonathan G. Katz, Secretary, [Release No. 34–51463; File No. SR–CBOE–
2005–19]
modified by a Letter Agreement among
Securities and Exchange Commission, CBOE, CBOT Holdings, Inc. (‘‘CBOT
450 Fifth Street, NW., Washington, DC Self-Regulatory Organizations; Holdings’’) and CBOT dated October 7,
20549–0609. Chicago Board Options Exchange, 2004 (the ‘‘October 2004 Letter
All submissions should refer to File Incorporated; Notice of Proposed Rule Agreement’’), and it is reflected in a
Number SR–CBOE–2005–27. This file Change and Amendment No. 1 Thereto related amendment to CBOE Rule 3.16.
number should be included on the Relating to an Interpretation of The 2001 Agreement as modified by
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the Paragraph (b) of Article Fifth of Its the October 2004 Letter Agreement
Commission process and review your Certificate of Incorporation and an represents the agreement of the parties
comments more efficiently, please use Amendment to Rule 3.16(b) concerning the nature and scope of the
only one method. The Commission will March 31, 2005.
Exercise Right following the
post all comments on the Commission’s Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the consummation of a proposed
Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/ Securities Exchange Act of 1934 restructuring of CBOT and in light of the
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the (‘‘Act’’),1 notice is hereby given that on expansion of the CBOT’s electronic
submission, all subsequent March 7, 2005, the Chicago Board trading system. The 2001 Agreement as
amendments, all written statements Options Exchange, Incorporated modified incorporates CBOE’s
with respect to the proposed rule (‘‘CBOE’’ or the ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with interpretation concerning the operation
change that are filed with the the Securities and Exchange of Article Fifth(b) in light of these
Commission, and all written Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the changed circumstances at CBOT. That
communications relating to the proposed rule change as described in interpretation, together with a proposed
proposed rule change between the Items I, II, and III below, which Items amendment to Rule 3.16, constitutes the
Commission and any person, other than have been prepared by the CBOE. On proposed rule change that is the subject
those that may be withheld from the March 28, 2005, the Exchange submitted of this filing.
public in accordance with the Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule In a Letter Agreement among CBOE,
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be change.2 The Commission is publishing CBOT Holdings and CBOT dated
available for inspection and copying in this notice to solicit comments on the February 14, 2005 (the ‘‘February 2005
the Commission’s Public Reference proposed rule change, as amended, from Letter Agreement’’), the parties
Section, 450 Fifth Street, NW., interested persons. confirmed that the proposed
Washington, DC 20549. Copies of such restructuring of the CBOT as described
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
filing also will be available for in Amendment 13 to the registration
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
inspection and copying at the principal the Proposed Rule Change statement filed by CBOT Holdings and
office of the CBOE. All comments CBOT on Form S–4 under the Securities
The proposed rule change consists of Act of 1933 as amended at that time,
received will be posted without change; an interpretation of paragraph (b) of
the Commission does not edit personal which was the last substantive
Article Fifth of the Certificate of amendment to the registration statement
identifying information from Incorporation of the CBOE pertaining to
submissions. You should submit only before it was declared effective by the
the right of the 1,402 Full Members of Commission on that date, constitutes
information that you wish to make the Board of Trade of the City of the CBOT restructuring for purposes of
available publicly. All submissions Chicago, Inc. (‘‘CBOT’’) to become the 2001 Agreement and CBOE’s
should refer to File Number SR–CBOE– members of CBOE without having to interpretation of Article Fifth(b)
2005–27 and should be submitted on or purchase a CBOE membership embodied therein. The 2001 Agreement
before April 28, 2005. (paragraph (b) of Article Fifth of CBOE’s as modified and clarified by the October
For the Commission, by the Division of Certificate of Incorporation is referred to 2004 Letter Agreement and the February
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated as ‘‘Article Fifth(b),’’ and the right of 2005 Letter Agreement is referred to
authority.6 CBOT Full Members to become herein as the ‘‘2001 Agreement as
Margaret H. McFarland,
members of CBOE as described therein amended.’’ The text of the 2001
is referred to as the ‘‘Exercise Right’’). Agreement is attached as Exhibit 3a to
Deputy Secretary.
This interpretation of the Exercise Right the CBOE’s Form 19b–4, the text of the
[FR Doc. E5–1582 Filed 4–6–05; 8:45 am]
1 15
October 7, 2004 Letter Agreement is
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 Due
attached as Exhibit 3b to the CBOE’s
to a pending motion to reconsider the
Commission’s approval of SR–CBOE–2004–16, Form 19b–4, the text of the February 14,
which was submitted on March 7, 2005, 2005 Letter Agreement is attached as
Amendment No. 1 removed certain language from Exhibit 3c to the CBOE’s Form 19b–4,
the text of CBOE Rule 3.16(b) that was included
with the original filing to reflect the stay of
and the opinion letter of CBOE’s special
effectiveness of the text added by SR–CBOE–2004– Delaware counsel is attached as Exhibit
16 pending a final Commission determination of the 3d to the CBOE’s Form 19b–4. The text
motion to reconsider. Accordingly, Amendment No. of the proposed rule change, including
1 revised the proposed rule change to reflect the
text of CBOE Rule 3.16 as currently in effect,
the above-referenced Exhibits and
without the language added to the Rule by SR– Amendment No. 1, is available on
CBOE–2004–16, and as it is proposed to be CBOE’s Web site (http://www.cboe.org/
modified by the current rule filing. Amendment No. Legal/SubmittedSECFilings.aspx), at the
1 also adds Exhibit 3d to the filing, which consists
of an opinion letter received by CBOE from its
CBOE’s Office of the Secretary, and at
special Delaware counsel that pertains to the the Commission’s Public Reference
6 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). proposed rule change. Room.

VerDate jul<14>2003 18:22 Apr 06, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00089 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\07APN1.SGM 07APN1

You might also like