You are on page 1of 2

Liquidated, harassed

In the course of the implementation of Oplan Bantay Laya, Marigza said several pastors, leaders
and members were either liquidated, harassed, unlawfully detained or tortured by alleged
military agents who were under Arroyos control and command responsibility.
In its ruling, the Court of Appeals said the RTC did not commit a grave abuse of discretion when
it denied Arroyos motion to dismiss on the grounds that the complaint failed to state a cause of
action against her as it did not contain a sufficient allegation about her actual role in Oplan
Bantay Laya (OBL).
Arroyo also claimed the UCCP lacked cause of action against her on the grounds that there was
damnum absque injuria (loss without injury); that the complaint was a suit against the state;
and the UCCP leaders did not have any cause of action for any alleged act on her part in the
performance of her official duties as President and Commander in Chief.
Read more: http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/736376/court-junks-arroyo-plea-vs-p5-4-m-suit-filed-byprotestants#ixzz3qO4mYkna
Follow us: @inquirerdotnet on Twitter | inquirerdotnet on Facebook
Liquidated, harassed
In the course of the implementation of Oplan Bantay Laya, Marigza said several pastors, leaders
and members were either liquidated, harassed, unlawfully detained or tortured by alleged
military agents who were under Arroyos control and command responsibility.
In its ruling, the Court of Appeals said the RTC did not commit a grave abuse of discretion when
it denied Arroyos motion to dismiss on the grounds that the complaint failed to state a cause of
action against her as it did not contain a sufficient allegation about her actual role in Oplan
Bantay Laya (OBL).
Arroyo also claimed the UCCP lacked cause of action against her on the grounds that there was
damnum absque injuria (loss without injury); that the complaint was a suit against the state;
and the UCCP leaders did not have any cause of action for any alleged act on her part in the
performance of her official duties as President and Commander in Chief.
Read more: http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/736376/court-junks-arroyo-plea-vs-p5-4-m-suit-filed-byprotestants#ixzz3qO4mYkna
Follow us: @inquirerdotnet on Twitter | inquirerdotnet on Facebook
Liquidated, harassed

In the course of the implementation of Oplan Bantay Laya, Marigza said several pastors, leaders
and members were either liquidated, harassed, unlawfully detained or tortured by alleged
military agents who were under Arroyos control and command responsibility.
In its ruling, the Court of Appeals said the RTC did not commit a grave abuse of discretion when
it denied Arroyos motion to dismiss on the grounds that the complaint failed to state a cause of
action against her as it did not contain a sufficient allegation about her actual role in Oplan
Bantay Laya (OBL).
Arroyo also claimed the UCCP lacked cause of action against her on the grounds that there was
damnum absque injuria (loss without injury); that the complaint was a suit against the state;
and the UCCP leaders did not have any cause of action for any alleged act on her part in the
performance of her official duties as President and Commander in Chief.
Read more: http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/736376/court-junks-arroyo-plea-vs-p5-4-m-suit-filed-byprotestants#ixzz3qO4mYkna
Follow us: @inquirerdotnet on Twitter | inquirerdotnet on Facebook

You might also like