Professional Documents
Culture Documents
165
Key words: zooplankton, tropical coastal lagoon, sand bar opening, persistence, resilience
Abstract
One of the main disturbances on Imboassica Lagoon is the occasional artificial opening of its sand bar. Following
two such events, two environmental gradients were observed. One was directly related to entry of marine water
(salinity gradient); and the other to a decrease in dilution of the nutrient load, because of water level reduction
(trophic status gradient). Two stations were sampled. At Station 1, located near the sand bar, salinity increase
caused a decrease in the total zooplankton density and a shift in community composition due to a loss of relatively
small individuals (i.e. rotifers) and the subsequent entrance of larger ones (i.e. copepods). High diversity was related
to salinity increases. At Station 2, located near the mouth of a sewage canal, the total zooplankton abundance and
dominance were related to the salinity increase, while the highest richness and the lowest dominance were obtained
at a high trophic state. The zooplankton community showed high persistence and resilience, which together with
other ecological features in the system, returned to the pre-disturbance state 2 months after the sand bar was closed.
Canonical correspondence analysis was a useful tool to assess system resilience.
Introduction
One of the central issues in ecology concerns the existence and strength of relationships between ecosystem
biodiversity and functioning. In this perspective, disturbances (anthropogenic or otherwise) may induce
responses of biodiversity and ecosystem functioning
(Loreau et al. 2001) through qualitative and quantitative changes in natural populations and communities (Connell & Sousa, 1983). Persistence is merely
expressed by qualitative changes and indicates that
populations and species either did not become extinct
during a given period of time and in a given area or if
extinction occurred that they managed to re-establish
within a time span required for one turnover of all
the individuals in the population (Connell & Sousa,
1983). Stability refers to the capacity of the system to
either resist or to return to pre-disturbance state after
significant changes (Connell & Sousa, 1983).
Coastal lagoons are inland water bodies occupying 13% of coastal areas worldwide, which are either
isolated from the sea by a barrier, or connected to
the ocean by one or more restricted inlets (Kjerfve,
1994). Located between land and sea, such systems
act as filters, retaining inorganic and organic nutrients
and material, which in combination with their relatively shallow depth, high penetration of solar radiation
and frequent water column mixing, usually result in
high biomass production (Kjerfve, 1994; Castel et al.,
1996). Because of these characteristics such systems
tend to be highly impacted by anthropogenic activities.
Anthropogenic impacts on coastal lagoons include the
acceleration of the eutrophication process and in many
cases the artificial opening of a channel in the sand
bar that isolates some coastal lagoons from the ocean.
Such interventions are made to improve and renew fish
stocks, export inorganic and organic material to the
166
sea, and to increase seawater inflow and water renewal
(Sei et al., 1996; Suzuki et al., 1998).
The opening of the sand bar provides a unique
opportunity to test the effect of an intermittent disturbance on the structure and resilience of aquatic
communities and ecosystem biodiversity and functioning. Recent studies have been conducted in Imbossica
Lagoon (northern Rio de Janeiro State, Brazil) in order
to understand the influence of such events on different
aquatic communities (Albertoni et al., 1998; Frota &
Caramaschi, 1998; Palma-Silva et al., 2000; Albertoni
et al., 2001; Palma-Silva et al., 2002) and processes
(Faria et al., 1998; Panosso & Esteves, 2000). The
aim of the present study was to investigate the effect
of this disturbance (sand bar opening) on the structure, persistence and resilience of the zooplankton
community. The relationships of the zooplankton to
other biotic and abiotic variables and system resilience
were assessed by means of canonical correspondence
analysis.
while the sand bar was open and with rainfall intensity
when it was consolidated.
In the field, 20 l water samples were obtained
through the entire water column with a diaphragm
electric pump (36900100 ITT Jabsco). The internal
diameter of the hose coupled to the pump was 1.5 cm
and the pumping rate was approximately 10 l per
min. Samples were filtered through a 68-m plankton net and preserved with a 4% buffered sucrose
formaldehyde solution. Sampling with the pump had
previously been compared with vertical net hauls and
a SchindlerPatalas sampler and shown to be the most
efficient for all zooplankton taxa (Kozlowsky-Suzuki
& Bozelli, 1998).
In the laboratory, five 1 ml sub samples of smallbodied zooplanktonic organisms (protozoans, rotifers,
copepod nauplii, and larvae of some meroplanktonic
organisms) were counted in Sedgewick-Rafter cells.
For larger organisms (cladocerans, juvenile and adult
copepods) sub samples of varying volumes, depending on the density of the organisms, were enumerated
in open chambers. In some cases entire samples were
counted.
Temperature was measured at the surface and the
bottom, and water transparency was estimated by
Secchi disc. Vertically integrated samples were obtained from the surface to the bottom of the water
column to estimate bacterial density, chlorophyll-a
content, physico-chemical variables and nutrient concentrations. Bacterial density was estimated using a
flow cytometer (FAC Sort, Becton Dickison) according to the protocol described by del Giorgio et al.
(1996) from samples preserved with 2% buffered and
filtered formaldehyde. Chlorophyll-a content, corrected for phaeophytin, was determined spectrophotometrically after filtration onto GF/C glass filters and
extraction with 80 C ethanol according to Nusch
& Palme (1975). Immediately after collection; pH
and conductivity were measured with a potentiometer,
total alkalinity was determined by sulphuric acid titration (Gran, 1952), salinity was measured with a
salinometer-refractometer and dissolved oxygen (O2 )
was estimated according to the Winkler method modified by Golterman et al. (1978).
In the laboratory, water samples from the entire water column were analyzed for total (TkN) and
dissolved Kjeldahl nitrogen (DkN) by titration after
digestion (Mackereth et al., 1978), nitrate plus nitrite
(NO
3 + NO2 ) by flow injection using the cadmium
reduction method described in Zagatto et al. (1981),
ammonium (NH+
4 ) according to the indophenol color-
167
Figure 1. Location of Imboassica Lagoon and sampling Stations 1 and 2, chosen to follow sand bar openings from November 7 1996 to May
17 1997.
168
169
densities of the 42 most common zooplankton taxa
from both sampling stations were used in the analysis.
To assess the significance of the ordination axes, 9999
unrestricted permutations were conducted using the
Monte Carlo test.
Results
Zooplankton composition and diversity
The zooplankton community was composed of 46 taxa
at Station 1 and 33 taxa at Station 2 (Tables 1 and 2).
The rotifers Brachionus rotundiformis and Hexarthra
brandorffi, calanoid and cyclopoid copepod nauplii,
calanoid copepodites, Polychaeta larvae, and Gastropoda veligers were the only taxa occurring at all
salinity values. Total zooplankton density ranged from
3150 to 4830 103 ind. m3 . At Station 1, zooplankton abundance had a negative relation with salinity
(r = 0.71, p < 0.001), whereas a positive relation
(r = 0.73, p < 0.01) was observed at Station 2.
At Station 1, before the sand bar openings, the zooplankton was numerically dominated by the rotifers
Brachionus rotundiformis and Hexarthra brandorffi.
In contrast, Copepoda was the most abundant zooplankton group while Imboassica Lagoon was connected to the sea. As soon as the lagoon was isolated
larvae of meroplanktonic organisms, mostly Gastropoda veligers, became the dominant taxa. At Station
2, Brachionus rotundiformis, Keratella cochlearis and
calanoid nauplii were the most abundant taxa when
the sand bar was open, whereas during closed periods
density maxima of Gastropoda and Bivalvia veligers
and Polychaeta larvae were observed.
Taxonomic richness ranged from 6 to 25 taxa,
while diversity varied from 1.44 to 12.24 taxa and
dominance from 0.23 to 0.93. At Station 1, salinity had
a positive relation with diversity (r = 0.42, p < 0.05),
but no significant relationship with richness (r = 0.16,
p > 0.05) and dominance (r = 0.15, p > 0.05).
Nevertheless, due to high richness and abundance of
copepods, not only the highest diversity (12.24 taxa)
but also highest richness (25 taxa) were recorded when
the lagoon was connected to the sea. At Station 2, the
highest diversity (7.08 taxa) and the lowest dominance
(0.29) were recorded when the sand bar was open.
However, salinity increase was only related with an
increase in the dominance (r = 0.55, p < 0.05), but
no relationship with richness (r = 0.38, p > 0.05)
and diversity (r = 0.43, p > 0.05) was seen. As a
170
171
Figure 2 CCA ordination diagram with zooplankton taxa (points) and variables (arrows) on the first two axes. Abbreviations of the variables are
given in the text and zooplankton taxa introduced were: Eup=Euplotes sp.; Fav=Favella cf. campanula; Bde=Bdelloidea; Bro=Brachionus rotundiformis; Fte=Filinia terminalis; Hbr=Hexarthra brandorffi; Kco=Keratella cochlearis; Lbu=Lecane bulla; Lgr=L.grandis; Sbi=Synchaeta
bicornis; Ssp=Synchaeta sp.; Tbi=Trichocerca bicristata; Amo=Alona cf. monacantha; Can=calanoid nauplii; Cyn=cyclopoid nauplii;
Han=harpacticoid nauplii; Cac=calanoid copepodites; Cyc=cyclopoid copepodites; Hac=harpacticoid copepodites; Pac=parasitic copepodites;
Ali=Acartia lilljeborgi; Ato=A.tonsa; Pcr=Paracalanus crassirostris; Psp=Paracalanus sp.; Apr=Apocyclops procerus; Mme=Metacyclops
mendocinus; Ohe=Oithona hebes; Oos=O.oswaldocruzi; Cgi=Corycaeus giesbrechti; Ocu=Oncaea cf. curta; Eac=Euterpina acutifrons;
Hal=Halicyclops sp.; Pco=parasitic copepods; Cir=Cirripedia cypris; Cin=Cirripedia nauplii; Biv=Bivalvia veligers; Gav=Gastropoda veligers;
Pol=Polychaeta larvae; Chl=Chaoboridae larvae; Ecl=Echinoderma larvae; Nem=Nematoda; Dec=Decapoda zoea.
172
Figure 3 CCA ordination diagram with samples (1 to 28) obtained at Station 1, as a function of the same variables and taxa mentioned in Fig. 2,
in the first two axes. The arrows represent the temporal sequence observed at this site. Numbers 1 and 2: samples collected before the sand bar
openings; 3 to 10: first open bar period; 11 to 17: first closed bar period; 18 and 19: second open bar period; and 20 to 28: second closed bar
period. C indicates sand bar closed periods; O sand bar open periods.
173
and after the first and second closures, r = 0.74,
p < 0.001.
CCA ordination: system resilience
The capacity of other environmental variables to return to pre-disturbance conditions is seen in Figure 3,
which shows the distribution of all samples obtained at
Station 1 (as a function of the same taxa and variables
introduced into the CCA) and indicates the resilience
of the system. The arrows in this figure represent the
temporal sequence since before the first sand bar opening until the period following the consolidation of the
sand bar after the second opening. The amount of
time following the closure of the sand bar determined the extent of recovery. After the first opening
(samples 11 to 17 in Fig. 3) the sand bar remained
closed for 30 days. After the second intervention
(samples 20 to 28) sampling was carried out until approximately 4 months after the closure and the most
similar samples to those obtained before the openings
(samples 1 and 2) were those collected from 59 days
after reconsolidation of the sand bar.
Discussion
Zooplankton community structure
One of the main consequences of the sand bar opening is a direct influence from the adjacent marine
environment, contributing to more variability in the
system. During such periods the lagoon presents estuarine characteristics and is subjected to daily physicochemical fluctuations that impose physiological and
behavioral adaptations by aquatic organisms. Salinity
was the main factor related to the structure of thezooplankton community (Fig. 2), a fact that has also been
observed for other coastal systems (Attayde & Bozelli,
1998; Schallenberg & Burns, 2003).
In our study, salinity increase was related to both
an increase (Station 2) and decrease (Station 1) in the
total zooplankton abundance. At Station 2, salinity
increase promoted a bloom of Gastropoda veligers,
while in Station 1 the lagoon fauna was replaced by
a marine one with loss of relatively small individuals
(i.e. rotifers) and entry of large organisms, although
at lower densities (i.e. copepods). Diversity patterns
also differed between sites; there was a tendency
to increase diversity with salinity increase at Station
1, while diversity seemed unaffected and community
dominance prevailed in Station 2. Changes in salinity
174
in a situation, which suggests an intense mineralization process. This copepod species has been observed
in polluted sites (J. Reid, pers. commun.) and was
the only copepod found in the hypereutrophic Jacarepagu Lagoon in Rio de Janeiro (Ferro-Filho, 1998).
In general, rotifers (as a part of the microzooplankton)
tend to increase in importance in terms of abundance
and/or biomass in high trophic status conditions (Bays
& Crisman, 1983; Beaver & Crisman, 1990).
Bacterioplankton, chlorophyll-a and abiotic variables
The decrease in bacterial numbers and chlorophyll-a
values might have resulted from drainage of lagoon
water exporting particulate and dissolved matter with
later incursion of nutrient-poor marine water (Knoppers & Moreira, 1988; Suzuki et al., 1998). Bacterioplankton reduction may also be related to the
decrease of dissolved organic carbon availability as
seawater entered the lagoon. Whereas, the increase
in nitrate plus nitrite and phosphorus concentrations
during the period of higher marine influence could be
related to sediment resuspension, the advective transport of interstitial water with entry of higher density
marine water or the reintroduction of previously exported lagoon water (Niencheski et al., 1988; Abreu
et al., 1995; Suzuki et al., 1998).
Although chlorophyll-a values tended to be higher
at Station 2 than at Station 1, recorded values were not
as high as expected for a system, which receives continuous nutrient input. Competition from macrophytes
and macroalgae (Charophyte), which densely colonize
this region of Imboassica Lagoon, may have restricted phytoplankton development. Recent observations
indicate that the fast recolonization of a community
of Charophyte following periods of sand bar opening
may not only prevent the development of phytoplankton by decreasing the availability of nutrients in the
water column but also provide substrate and shelter for
the establishment of a diverse community of grazers
(Albertoni et al., 2001; Palma-Silva et al., 2002).
Lower pH, water transparency, and N:P ratio values and higher chlorophyll-a, orthophosphate, total
phosphorus, ammonium, and total nitrogen at Station
2 than at Station 1 suggest a higher trophic status
in that part of Imboassica Lagoon. This condition is
enhanced while the sand bar is open as water level reduction exposes macrophytes and benthic macroalgae
leading to their death (Palma-Silva et al., 2002) and
decomposition. A similar situation was also observed
175
on the community composition when opening of the
sand bar occurs. Therefore, the zooplankton composition at a particular time is a result of the time interval
during which the lagoon remains closed in conjunction
with climatic conditions, mainly precipitation. The
amount of time the sand bar remains open seems to be
less important for the resilience of the system, since
after the closure marine species are gradually, but relatively soon excluded from the community. When
the lagoon is connected to the sea, marine organisms
will dominate the zooplankton in both diversity and
abundance. In intermediate periods, those in which the
sand bar has been recently closed, or without some
minimum time interval to develop a freshwater community, the zooplankton comprises a reduced number
of taxa, which are able to tolerate abrupt changes in
salinity. In periods when the sand bar remains closed
for a longer period of time, freshwater organisms
comprise the community, which then tends to include
high number of species or taxa. A spatial distribution
study carried out during 2 different periods in Imboassica Lagoon, showed that at low salinity conditions
(0.16 to 1.97 psu) a diverse zooplankton community is
dominated both in richness and abundance by cladocerans, mainly Moina minuta and at higher salinities
(11.67 to 18.25 psu) low diversity is found and the
community characterized by the dominance of copepods and meroplanktonic larvae, reduced number of
rotifers and absence of cladocerans (Branco, unpubl.
data). The first situation was observed when the lagoon
was isolated for approximately one year, whereas the
second scenario was seen 25 days after the consolidation of the sand bar. In our study, the pre-disturbance
community was isolated from the sea for 7 months. We
would, then expect that the time required for the reestablishment of the freshwater community to be much
longer than that required for the transient community
analyzed in the present study.
Conclusions
The opening of the sand bar provided a unique opportunity to assess the effect of a disturbance on
the structure and resilience of the zooplankton community. Salinity was the main factor structuring the
zooplankton community, to which composition and diversity were significantly related. Community persistence and resilience were guaranteed by the prevalence
of species with relatively short life cycles and broad
salinity tolerances. However, the effects of salinity on
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank S. Melo particularly for
his assistance in fieldwork, S. Jos de Paggi, G-O.
Brandorff, S. Bonecker, C. Dias, J. Reid and F. Joppert for identification and/or confirmation of some
zooplankton species, W. Granli for the use of the flow
cytometer and other facilities of the Limnology Department of Lund University, Sweden, R. Panosso, G.
Fistarol, M. Schallenberg and an anonymous referee
for valuable comments on the manuscript and J. Reid
for correcting the language. Grants were received from
CNPq, Petrobras, and Pronex.
References
Abreu, P. C., C. Hartmann & C. Odebrecht, 1995. Nutrient-rich saltwater and its influence on the phytoplankton of the Patos lagoon
estuary, southern Brazil. Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science 40:
219229.
Albertoni, E. F., C. Palma-Silva & F. A. Esteves, 1998. Larvae and
post-larvae of Penaeidae and Palaemonidae in coastal lagoons of
the north of Rio de Janeiro (Maca, RJ). Revista Brasileira de
Biologia 59: 109117.
Albertoni, E. F., C. Palma-Silva & F. A. Esteves, 2001. Macroinvertebrates associated with Chara in a tropical coastal lagoon
(Imboassica Lagoon, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil). Hydrobiologia 457:
215224.
Attayde, J. L. & R. L. Bozelli, 1998. Assessing the indicator properties of zooplankton assemblages to disturbance gradients by canonical correspondence analysis. Canadian Journal of Fisheries
and Aquatic Sciences 55: 17891797.
Bays, J. S. & T. L. Crisman, 1983. Zooplankton and trophic state
relationships in Florida lakes. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and
Aquatic Sciences 40: 18131819.
176
Beaver, J. R. & T. L. Crisman, 1990. Use of microzooplankton
as an early indicator of advancing cultural eutrophication. Verh.
Internat. Verein. Limnol. 24: 532537.
Bonecker, S. L. C., 1995. Dinmica do zooplncton no sistema estuarino do rio Mucuri (BA). PhD thesis, University of So Paulo,
USP, SP, Brazil, 154 pp.
Branco, C. W. C, F. A. Esteves & B. Kozlowsky-Suzuki, 2000. The
zooplankton and other limnological features of a humic coastal
lagoon (Lagoa Comprida, Maca, R.J.) in Brazil. Hydrobiologia
437: 7181.
Burns, C. W. & M. Schallenberg, 2001. Calanoid copepods versus
cladocerans: Consumer effects on protozoa in lakes of different
trophic status. Limnology and Oceanography 46: 15581565.
Castel, J., P. Caumette & R. Herbert, 1996. Eutrophication gradients
in coastal lagoons as exemplified by the Bassin dArcachon and
the tang du Prvost. Hydrobiologia 329: R9R28.
Castro-Longoria, E., 2003. Egg production and hatching success
of four Acartia species under different temperature and salinity
regimes. Journal of Crustacean Biology 23: 289299.
Cervetto, G., R. Gaudy & M. Pagano, 1999. Influence of salinity on
distribution of Acartia tonsa (Copepoda, Calanoida). Journal of
Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 235: 3345.
Connell, J. H. & W. P. Sousa, 1983. On the evidence needed to
judge ecological stability or persistence. American Naturalist
121: 789824.
del Giorgio, P. A., D. F. Bird, Y. T. Prairie, & D. Planas, 1996.
Flow cytometric determination of bacterial abundance in lake
plankton with the green nucleic acid stain SYTO 13. Limnology
and Oceanography 41: 783789.
Dias, C. O., 1995. Distribuio de Copepoda (Crustacea) ao largo da
costa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro. Revista Brasileira de Biologia
54: 147156.
Dollan, J. R. & C. C. Gallegos, 1992. Trophic role of planktonic
rotifers in the Rhode River Estuary, spring-summer 1991. Marine
Ecology Progress Series 85: 187199.
Faria, B. M., M. S. Suzuki, M. M. Petrucio & A. Enrich-Prast,
1998. Changes in metabolism of a Brazilian lagoon related to
man-made marine entrances. Verh. Internat. Verein. Limnol. 26:
14421444.
Ferro-Filho, A. S., 1998. Influncias das floraes de
cianobactrias na dinmica de populaes zooplanctnicas
da lagoa de Jacarepagu (RJ): efeitos txicos de Microcystis
aeruginosa sobre cladceros. PhD Thesis, Federal University of
Rio de Janeiro, UFRJ, RJ, Brazil, 248 pp.
Fielder, D. S., G. J. Purser & S. C. Battaglene, 2000. Effect of rapid
changes in temperature and salinity on availability of the rotifers
Brachionus rotundiformis and Brachionus plicatilis. Aquaculture
189: 8599.
Frota, L. O. & E. P. Caramaschi, 1998. Aberturas artificiais da barra
da lagoa Imboassica e seus efeitos sobre a fauna de peixes. In
Esteves, F. A. (ed.), Lagoas Costeiras: Bases ecolgicas para
o uso sustentvel da lagoa Imboassica e das lagoas do Parque
Nacional da Restinga de Jurubatiba. NUPEM/UFRJ, Rio de
Janeiro: 327350.
Gaudy, R., G. Cervetto & M. Pagano, 2000. Comparison of the
metabolism of Acartia clausi and A. tonsa: influence of temperature and salinity. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and
Ecology 247: 5165.
Golterman, H. L., R. S. Climo & M. A. M. Ohnstad, 1978. Methods for Physical and Chemical Analysis of Freshwaters. I.B.P.
Handbook No. 8, Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.
Gran, G., 1952. Determination of the equivalent point in potentiometric titrations. Part II. Analyst 77: 661671.
177
Palma-Silva, C., E. F. Albertoni & F. A. Esteves, 2000. Eleocharis
mutata (L.) Roem. et Schult. subject to drawdowns in a tropical
coastal lagoon, State of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Plant Ecology
148: 157164.
Palma-Silva, C., E. F. Albertoni & F. A. Esteves, 2002. Clear water
associated with biomass and nutrient variation during the growth
of a Charophyte stand after a drawdown, in a tropical coastal
lagoon. Hydrobiologia 482: 7987.
Panosso, R. F. & F. A. Esteves, 2000. Effects of disturbance on
phosphorus turnover and plankton dynamics. Journal of Plankton
Research 22: 589595.
Reynolds, C. S., 1993. Scales of disturbance and their role in
plankton ecology. Hydrobiologia. 249: 157171.
Ross, S. T., W. J. Matthews & A. A. Echelle, 1985. Persistence
of stream fish assemblages: effects of environmental change.
American Naturalist 126: 2440.
Sarma, S. S. S., B. Elguea-Snchez & S. Nandini, 2002. Effect of
salinity on competition between the rotifers Brachionus rotundiformis Tschugunoff and Hexarthra jenkinae (De Beauchamp)
(Rotifera). Hydrobiologia 474: 183188.
Schallenberg, M. & C. W. Burns, 2003. A temperate, tidal lakewetland complex. II Water quality and implications for zooplank-