You are on page 1of 2

1.

The Parole Evidence Rule applies to:


a. Subsequent agreement placed
on issue
b. Written
agreement
or
contractual documents
c. Judgment on a compromise
agreement
d. Will and testaments
2. A Xerox copy of a document:
a. Is admissible
b. Could be admissible
c. Never admissible
d. Has a probative value
3. TRUE OR FALSE: in general, the Parole
Evidence Rule is designed to give
certainty to all transactions, preserve
the reliability and protect the sanctity
of the agreement.
4. It refers to any evidence to prove the
contents of a document other than the
original document itself. SECONDARY
EVIDENCE.
5. It is any evidence in aliunde, whether
oral or written, which is intended or
tends to vary or contradict a complete
and enforceable agreement embodied
in a document. PAROLE EVIDENCE.

6. TRUE OR FALSE: (In general) the


Parole Evidence Rule applies only to
contractual documents.

7. TRUE OR FALSE: The Parole Evidence


Rule does not apply where at least one
party to the suit is not a party nor a
privy to a party to the written
instrument and does not base his
claim, nor assert his right arising from
the instrument or established therein.
8. TRUE OR FALSE: Due execution of a
writing may be proved by parole
evidence.
9. TRUE OR FALSE: In order that the
parole evidence may be admissible,
the mistake or imperfection of the
document, (or its failure to express the
true intent and agreement of the
parties, or the validity of the
agreement) must be put in issue by
the pleadings. Where the plaintif
failed to allege any such fact in his
complaint, he cannot introduce parole
evidence thereon.

10. It is the principle that public records


cannot be removed or brought out
from where they are officially kept.
PRINCIPLE OF IRREMOVABILITY OF
PUBLIC RECORDS.
11. It is the principle that the written
agreement is the final culmination of
the negotiation and discussion of the
parties as to their respective proposals
and counter- proposals and is the final
and sole repository, memorial and
evidence of what was finally agreed
upon.
PRINCIPLE
OF
INTERROGATION OF JURAL ACTS
12. TRUE OR FALSE: The Parole Evidence
Rule does not apply to collateral
agreements. (PNB vs. Seeto, 1952)
13. It
means
that
the
instrument/document itself is clear and
certain on its face but the ambiguity
arises from some extrinsic, collateral
or outside factor, thus there is
uncertainty as to how the terms are to
be enforced. LATENT/INTRINSIC.
14. In cases of secondary evidence, who
has the burden of proof?
THE
OFFEROR OF THE SECONDARY
EVIDENCE HAS THE BURDEN OF
PROOF.

15. One of these statements are


not
correct: The Parole Evidence Rule
a. Applies
only
to
written
agreement and wills
b. Applies only to parties thereto
and their successors-in-interest
c. Does not apply to a party to a
suit who is not a signatory or
who does not derive a right
from such signatory to the
written agreement or will
d. Applies to all parties to a
suit regardless of whether
they are parties or not to or
derive their right under a
written agreement or will
involve in a suit.
16. TRUE OR FALSE: The oferor, upon
proof of its execution/existence and
cause of its unavailability, without bad
faith on his part, may prove its
contents, in no particular order.
a. A copy;

b. A recital of its contents in some


authentic document;

c. The testimony of the witness.

You might also like