Eviromental

Quantity input materials

Impacts of failure on natural enviroment
Potential impacts upon ecological integrity
Quality of solid waste
Solid output re-use
Social
Public health and safety
Workers health and safety
Hazardous materials
Local sourcing
Existing local businesses
Local job creation and diversity
Community attitudes
Economic
Total Project Cost
Financial Recoveries
Ease of obtaining third-party funfing
ease of obtaining necessary permits
Interference with activities on site
Logistics
Potential for fines, penalties and surcharges
land footprint

Carbon black
+

Enviromental
Ecological Integrity
Use of Natural Resources
Education
Recovery
Annual Tailings handling cost
Energy Consumption
Air Emissions

Social
Impact on Community
Complexity
Availability of Local Labour Supply
Community Benefits

Economic
Annual tailings handling costs
Annual tailings handling costs
Operational costs
Partnership

Indicator
Contaminan Risk
Reduction of need for raw materials
prmotional of best practice waste management to community
Waste Recovery/Reduction Potential
Water use
Energy Use
Air Emission

Indicator
Opportunities for Local Business Generation
Ease of waste management option
Local job retention and employment
Use of materials in public amenities

Indicator
Corporate Image
Community Economic Benefits
Relative costs of option
Corporate partnership opportunities

Remarks
The level of risk to the enviroment associated woth any residual contaminant in the end-use produ
This Metric measures the potential avoidance/reduction of raw materials by replacement of these t
The potential to highlight replacement of raw materials and reuse/recycle of waste to community a
This metric indicates the potential for which the entire product can be recovered through re-use or
This Metric indicates the volume of water required in the re-use recycling process (including proces
This metric indicates the intensity of energy usage in achieving the end use
This metric indicates the intensity of air emission associated with the reuse or recycling option incl

Remarks
This compares the potential growth or development of local businesses, including processors and e
It is high valuable to stakeholders for waste management services to be easily accessible. Waste m
The generation of additional employment or local employment is an important consideration.
This compares to potential for or ability of materials to be utilised for public use / in public amenitie

Remarks
This indicator compares the potential benefit to the corporate image of businesses that undertake
This indicator compares the relative potential cost savings for each options in terms of where it can
This indicator compares the relative cost of each option. Costs can be an estimate or average of ea
Compares the opportunities for partnership between waste producer, waste processor and waste e

se of the waste product

ate in sustainable waste management

waste an manufacturing of product)

ocessing of waste an manufacturing of product

sposed of illegally if the option is too difficult or costly. Options should not be cost prohibitive and should be i

the cost of using raw materials in community/public spaces.

n. The lowest cost will score 100, while the most expensive will score 0.

bitive and should be involve easy transport between all players (tyre disposer, tyre processor and end-produ

cessor and end-product user).